Abstract
Digital dry gangrene is commonly seen in cases of connective tissue disease such as systemic sclerosis. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) digital gangrene is rare. As initial manifestation, it is again a rare phenomenon because it occurs late in the course of disease. Here we are reporting the case of a woman who was having extensive cutaneous gangrene of her fingers and toes, as a first and foremost presentation without any other typical signs and symptoms of SLE. Her serology was positive for SLE. The patient was treated conservatively and responded well.
Keywords: immunological products and vaccines, musculoskeletal and joint disorders, emergency medicine, vasculitis, systemic lupus erythematosus
Background
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory, autoimmune disease involving multiple organs and systems with varied clinical features. Digital gangrene, a form of vascular injury in SLE, is a rare and severe complication that may cause amputation of digits.1 Atherosclerosis, vasculitis, hypercoagulability and vasospasm are responsible for the development of such a complication.
Here a middle-aged woman presented first time as a case of digital gangrene of all limbs due to SLE. SLE with digital gangrene was first reported by Dubois and Arteberry2 and Alarcon-Segovia and Osmundson.3 It is found only in 1.3% of cases of SLE.2 4 Gangrene of digits as an initial presentation is very rare and is often found in the late stage of the disease. Till now only a few cases are reported for the primary manifestation of SLE as digital gangrene.
Case presentation
A 40-year-old woman presented to medicine outdoor with the chief complaint of 1.5-month history of rapidly developing, painful digital gangrene of the bilateral fingers and toes. The patient had no previous history of joint pain, hair loss, photosensitivity, oral ulcers, malar rash or butterfly rash. No history was suggestive of Raynaud’s phenomenon. There was no history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension. No history of tobacco smoking or medication in the past. History of trauma, infection, or exposure to chemical substance was also not there. On general examination, she was afebrile, conscious and oriented. Her pulse rate was 70/min, regular, normovolemic and all peripheral pulses were palpable while blood pressure was 130/84 mm Hg. Ankle-brachial index was normal. All other systemic examinations were normal. There was dry gangrene involving the fingers and toes (figure 1).
Figure 1.
Dry gangrene in finger tips of all four limbs.
Investigations
Biochemical tests showed haemoglobin of 127 g/L, total leucocyte count 10.23×109/L, platelets 170×109/L. Red blood cells count was 3.08×1012/L and haematocrit 38.3%. Fasting lipid profile was normal. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was raised to 75 mm/hour (normal 0–29 mm/hour for women). Higher C reactive protein (CRP) of 31.5 mg/L (normal 0–8 mg/L) found. Echocardiography (2D-echo), ultrasonography abdomen and bilateral lower limb Doppler study were normal.
Immunologic studies like antinuclear antibody (ANA) was positive with homogeneous staining pattern of titre 1: 100 (low titres are in the range of 1:40 to 1:60), Antidouble-stranded (ds) DNA was positive at 56 IU/L (normal <50 IU/L) hence also the extractable nuclear antigen screen. Anti-β2 glycoprotein (GPI) (immunoglobulin (Ig) G) was normal with a titre of 3 AU/mL (normal 0–12). Lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody were also negative. Fibrin degradation product and D-Dimer tests were found negative to explain any intravascular coagulation. Further tests of serum cryoglobulin and cryofibrinogen were done and both found negative. Urine dipstick and microscopy were normal. Kidney and liver profiles were normal along with negative viral markers like hepatitis B and C. Diabetes mellitus and any possibility of atherosclerosis was negative. Random blood sugar was 120 g/dL and HbA1C was 5.5%. Rheumatoid arthritis factor was also negative.
Based on history, examination and investigations diagnosis of lupus digital gangrene without antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was made.
Differential diagnosis
Patient presented with digital gangrene suggestive of microvascular occlusion. On the basis of history and investigations infections, drugs and addiction, trauma, diabetes or emboli were ruled out. Hyperviscosity syndrome like cryoglobulinaemia and polycythaemia vera was not found. Hypercoagulable states both hereditary and acquired were also not present. Among small vessel vasculitis, scleroderma, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, lupus (SLE) and rheumatoid, were the differential diagnosis. SLE was confirmed in this patient due to the presence of high titre of ANA and anti-ds-DNA.
Treatment
Treatment was started using antibiotics, corticosteroids, immunosuppressives and anticoagulants. Glucocorticoid (1 mg/kg/day) and aspirin (81 mg/day) were started. Two infusions, of 1000 mg rituximab at a 14-day interval were given with significant reduction in ESR and CRP and elevation of complements. After completion of two infusions we added 100 mg/day azathioprine and 200 mg/day hydroxychloroquine in therapy. Glucocorticoid was tapered up to 5 mg/day in 3 months.
Outcome and follow-up
During treatment, there was auto amputation of distal phalanx of four fingers of right hand except for the thumb, within 2–3 weeks, which gradually healed up. However, there was a marked improvement in all other fingers and toes, within 3–4 months of treatment. After 1 year of treatment and follow-up patient improved significantly. There was reduction in ESR to 28 mm/hour and CRP to 7 mg/L.
Discussion
SLE with primary symptoms of digital gangrene is a very rare entity and literature are more about SLE with antiphospholipid antibodies.5 It was further asserted by Rosato et al 6 that digital ulcers and gangrene are never found as the first presentation in SLE. Kurnia et al,7 Omair et al 8 also reported such a rare presentation, where the patient had SLE with secondary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and overlap syndrome respectively. To date, the exact aetiology behind digital gangrene in SLE remains unclear. The probable mechanism and pathophysiology of digital gangrene in SLE is thromboembolism, premature atherosclerosis, vasospasm, hypercoagulability and vasculitis.9 A study was done by Liu et al in 2684 SLE patients, where 18 patients had digital gangrene and their average age at complication was 33.1±11.8 years and the average disease duration was 99.1±60.1 months. It was also observed that longer disease duration (≥4 years), Raynaud's phenomenon and elevated serum CRP were highly prone for digital gangrene. Here it was found that early and aggressive high dose corticosteroid treatment prevented gangrene from progression and improved prognosis.9 In a case report of a 12-year-old girl by Zieaa et al steroids and mycophenolate mofetil were given for her digital gangrene and good results were found.10 Jeffery et al found critical peripheral ischaemia as one of the causes along with positive antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Treatment with rituximab responded by one.11 Orhan et al also reported a similar case report of SLE with digital ischaemia and managed by rituximab.12
APS (in 3.3%–7.5% of cases), and β2GPI are an important risk factor for digital gangrene in SLE. Raynaud's phenomenon also associated with digital gangrene in SLE.3
Serological markers define management options such as vasodilator drugs would be required in patients of mixed connective tissue disorder/overlap syndrome. Early diagnosis and treatment including corticosteroid, immunosuppressives and lipid-lowering agents and anticoagulation are streamlined management strategies of digital gangrene in SLE. Risk of digital amputation gets decreased after the use of corticosteroids.9
Learning points.
Systemic lupus erythematosus having digital gangrene as the initial symptom is rare.
Serological markers define management options.
Steroids, rituximab, cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil are the treatment available.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Biochemistry, Radiology, Rheumatology.
Footnotes
Contributors: SKS, SK: manuscript writing. VA: helped in writing of paper. SCC: web search for articles.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent for publication: Obtained.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
References
- 1. Adelowo O, Olaosebikan H, Ajani W, et al. Digital gangrene as the initial presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus. BMJ Case Rep 2012;2012. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-006259. [Epub ahead of print: 01 Nov 2012]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dubois EL, ARTERBERRY JD. Gangrene as a manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. JAMA 1962;181:366–74. 10.1001/jama.1962.03050310006002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Alarcon-Segovia D, Osmundson PJ. Peripheral vascular syndromes associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Intern Med 1965;62:907–19. 10.7326/0003-4819-62-5-907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Das MP, Borah P, Thakuria B, et al. Small vessel vasculitis, an uncommon presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Assoc Physicians India 2017;65:100–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Patabendige M, Barnasuriya G, Mampitiya I. Severe preeclampsia, antiphospholipid syndrome, and ulnar artery thrombosis in a teenage pregnancy: a rare association. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2018;2018:1–4. 10.1155/2018/1794723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rosato E, Molinaro I, Pisarri S, et al. Digital ulcers as an initial manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Intern Med 2011;50:767–9. 10.2169/internalmedicine.50.4617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kurnia E, Hardi F, Dewiasty E. Digital gangrene in systemic lupus erythematosus. Acta Med Indones 2012;44:335–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Omair MA, Bookman A, Mittoo S. Digital gangrene in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2012;39:1895–7. 10.3899/jrheum.120123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Liu A, Zhang W, Tian X, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and outcome of digital gangrene in 2684 lupus patients. Lupus 2009;18:1112–8. 10.1177/0961203309106643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ziaee V, Yeganeh MH, Moradinejad M-H. Peripheral gangrene: a rare presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus in a child. Am J Case Rep 2013;14:337–40. 10.12659/AJCR.889290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jeffery RC, Narshi CB, Isenberg DA. Prevalence, serological features, response to treatment and outcome of critical peripheral ischaemia in a cohort of lupus patients. Rheumatology 2008;47:1379–83. 10.1093/rheumatology/ken210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Küçükşahin O, Düzgün N, Okoh AK, et al. Response to rituximab in a case of lupus associated digital ischemia. Case Rep Rheumatol 2014;2014 10.1155/2014/763608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

