Abstract
Many human pathogens use host cell-surface receptors to attach and invade cells. Often, the host-pathogen interaction affinity is low, presenting opportunities to block invasion using a soluble, high-affinity mimic of the host protein. The Plasmodium falciparum reticulocyte-binding protein homolog 5 (RH5) provides an exciting candidate for mimicry: it is highly conserved and its moderate affinity binding to the human receptor basigin (KD≥1 μM) is an essential step in erythrocyte invasion by this malaria parasite. We used deep mutational scanning of a soluble fragment of human basigin to systematically characterize point mutations that enhance basigin affinity for RH5 and then used Rosetta to design a variant within the sequence space of affinity-enhancing mutations. The resulting seven-mutation design exhibited 1,900-fold higher affinity (KD approximately 1nM) for RH5 with a very slow binding off rate (0.23 h-1) and reduced the effective Plasmodium growth-inhibitory concentration by at least tenfold compared to human basigin. The design provides a favorable starting point for engineering on-rate improvements that are likely to be essential to reach therapeutically effective growth inhibition.
Keywords: High-affinity design, Rosetta, deep sequencing, host-pathogen interactions, Plasmodium falciparum
Introduction
Malaria is the deadliest parasitic disease with over 200 million clinical cases annually1. The unicellular parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, causes the most fatal and severe form of the disease, and the emergence of P. falciparum mutants that are resistant to frontline therapeutic interventions is a major cause of concern2. New modes of blocking the parasite are therefore urgently needed. Invasion of host erythrocytes is essential to the life cycle of Plasmodium parasites providing opportunities for inhibiting pathogenesis. The interaction between the P. falciparum reticulocyte-binding protein homolog 5 (RH5) and the human erythrocyte-surface receptor basigin was shown to be absolutely essential to erythrocyte invasion and P. falciparum pathogenesis3–6. Indeed, RH5 is highly conserved among all P. falciparum field isolates6–10; antibodies that target RH5 inhibit pathogenesis; inoculation with RH5 in model animals provides protective immunity4,6–8,10–12; and clinical trials are underway to test the efficacy of RH5 subunit vaccines in humans13.
The molecular structures of RH5 in complex with the extracellular fragment of basigin and with neutralizing antibodies are known10,14, enabling the computational design of improved vaccine immunogens based on RH515. RH5 folds into a novel kite-like structure, and basigin interacts at a tip of RH5 through two immunoglobulin-like domains that are connected by a flexible linker10. Although the interaction surface area between RH5 and basigin (~1,900 Å2) is above average for protein-protein interactions16, the molecular contacts between RH5 and basigin are tenuous, comprising mainly hydrogen bonds. Furthermore, the interaction surface on basigin comprises the flexible hinge region that connects the two extracellular immunoglobulin-like domains, potentially reducing affinity due to the loss in conformational freedom upon binding. Accordingly, the interaction affinity between RH5 and basigin is low (KD ≥ 1 μM)10,17, and the application of the extracellular domain blocks invasion in growth assays only at high and therapeutically unrealistic concentrations (IC50 > 10 μM)8. Animal immunizations using RH5 led to the isolation of several high-affinity anti-RH5 antibodies that exhibited much improved growth-inhibitory concentration (IC50=0.1 μM) compared to basigin12, demonstrating that binding to RH5 could provide a therapeutically relevant route. Molecular structures, however, revealed that these antibodies interacted with RH5 through surfaces that only partially overlapped with the basigin-binding surface10, making them susceptible to the emergence of RH5 escape mutants.
The current study seeks to design a variant of basigin that targets the same site on RH5 as basigin but interacts with substantially higher affinity. Such a basigin mimic may have several advantages over antibodies: (1) by interacting with the essential surface of RH5, it would limit the potential emergence of RH5 escape mutants; (2) it would be minimally mutated relative to human basigin, exhibiting a minor risk of immunogenicity; and (3) basigin interacts with RH5 through a 25 kDa fragment, compared to a typical size of 150 kDa for IgGs. Thus, although such an inhibitor would not exhibit the avidity or Fc-mediated immunological response seen in dimeric IgGs, it would require the administration of lower protein mass.
RH5-binding affinity, however, is not the only consideration in developing an effective inhibitor, and binding kinetics are likely to play a major role in determining the neutralization efficacy. Indeed, RH5 is not localized to the parasite cell surface and is only briefly accessible when the parasite and red blood cell are attached12. It is therefore thought that the window of opportunity for binding RH5 and blocking invasion may be as short as 10-30 seconds and therefore, among RH5-targeting antibodies, growth inhibition correlates with binding on rates12.
In recent years, deep mutational scanning has emerged as a powerful strategy to identify affinity-enhancing mutations18,19. In this approach, positions on the binder are individually mutated to all possible amino acid identities, combined into a cell-display library and subjected to high-throughput screening for binding to the target molecule, followed by deep sequencing to map the relative contribution of each mutation to affinity. Typically, following mapping, another genetic library is encoded with a set of the affinity-enhancing mutations, and selections isolate multipoint mutants with an improved affinity19–21. Here, we used deep mutational scanning to identify mutations on the surface of basigin that would individually increase affinity for RH5. Next, we used Rosetta to design a combination of these affinity-enhancing mutations that would maximally increase affinity for RH5. Testing only a single design encoding seven mutations, we surprisingly found that this design resulted in a remarkable 1,900-fold higher affinity for RH5. This design provides a proof-of-principle for the rapid generation of high-affinity soluble blockers of essential host-pathogen protein-protein interactions.
Materials & methods
Basigin genetic library construction
Forward and reverse primers with the degenerate codon NNS were generated for the 62 positions on the soluble basigin fragment, essentially as described22. Primers were ordered from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, Rehovot, Israel) and used to introduce all possible amino acids per position by QuickChange mutagenesis23. Next, the PCR product of each position was transformed into yeast (EBY100 cells) and plated on SD-Trp- as described24. As described25, plates with more than 400 colonies were scraped with 1 ml SDCAA, 50 μl was added to 5 ml SDCAA tube and cells were then grown at 30°C overnight. The point mutants were divided into four libraries, corresponding to positions that were at most 130 bp apart from one another to enable deep mutational scanning using 150 bp reads.
Yeast surface display selection
Yeast-display experiments were conducted essentially as described 25. Briefly, yeast cells were grown in selective medium SDCAA overnight at 30°C. The cells were then resuspended in 10 ml induction medium and incubated at 20°C for 20 h. 107 cells were then used for yeast-cell surface display experiments: cells were subjected to primary antibody (mouse monoclonal IgG1 anti-c-Myc (9E10) sc-40, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for expression monitoring and biotinylated ligand at 725 nM PfRH5ΔNL10 in PBS-F for 30 min at room temperature. The cells then underwent a second staining with fluorescently labeled secondary antibody (AlexaFluor488 - goat-anti-mouse IgG1 Life Technologies]) for scFv labeling, streptavidin-APC (SouthernBiotech) for ligand labeling for 10 min at 4°C. Next, cell fluorescence was measured, and cells were collected under sorting conditions for expression and top 15% binders. The selection gates were calibrated using the wild-type soluble BSG, and these gates were subsequently applied to the mutant library. Following fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), cells were grown in SDCAA for 1-2 days and plasmids were extracted using Zymoprep Yeast Plasmid Miniprep II kit (Zymo Research).
DNA sequences of tested constructs
>BSG
GCGGGTACCGTTTTCACCACCGTAGAAGACCTGGGTTCTAAAATCCTGCTGACCTGCTCTCTGAACGACTCTGCGACCGAAGTTACCGGTCACCGTTGGCTGAAAGGTGGTGTTGTTCTGAAAGAAGACGCGCTGCCGGGTCAGAAAACCGAATTCAAAGTTGATTCTGATGACCAGTGGGGTGAATACTCTTGCGTTTTCCTGCCAGAACCGATGGGCACCGCGAACATCCAACTGCACGGTCCGCCTCGTGTTAAAGCGGTTAAATCTTCTGAACACATCAACGAAGGTGAAACCGCGATGCTGGTATGCAAATCTGAATCTGTTCCGCCGGTTACCGACTGGGCGTGGTACAAAATCACCGACAGCGAAGACAAAGCGCTGATGAACGGTTCCGAATCTCGTTTCTTTGTTTCTTCTTCTCAGGGTCGTTCTGAGCTGCACATCGAAAACCTGAACATGGAAGCGGACCCTGGCCAATATCGTTGCAATGGCACCTCTTCTAAAGGTTCTGATCAAGCGATCATCACCCTGCGTGTTCGTTAATAG
>BSGdes7
GCGGGCACCATCTTCACTTCTGCGGAAGACCTGGGTTCTAAAATCCTGCTCACCTGTTCTCTGAACGACTCCGCGACTGAAGTTACCGGTCATCGTTGGCTCAAGGGTGGTGTTGTTCTGAAAGAAGACGCGCTGCCAGGTCAGAAAACCGAATTCAAAGTTGATTCTGACGACCAGTGGGGTGAATACTCTTGTGTTTTCCTCCCAGAGCCAATGGGTACCGCGAACATCATCCTGTACGGTCCGCCACGTGTGAAAGCGGTTAAATCTTCTGAACACATCAACGAAGGTGAAACCGCGATGCTGGTTTGTAAATCTGAATCTGTTCCGCCGGTTACCGACTGGGCGTGGTATAAGATCACCGACTCTGAAGACAAAGCGCTCATGAACGGTTCTGAGTCCCGCTTTTTCGTTTCTTCTTCCTTCGGTCGTTCCGAACTGCACATTGAAAACCTGAACATGGAAGCGGACCCAGGCCAATATCGCTGTAACGGCACTTCTCAGAAGGGTTCCGACCAAGCGATCATCACCCTGCGTGTTCGTCTCGAGGGCGGCGGATCCGAACAAAAGCTTATTTCTGAAGAGGACTTGTAATAG
DNA preparation for deep sequencing
To connect the DNA adaptors for deep sequencing, the plasmids extracted from the libraries were amplified using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (ThermoFisher) in a two-step PCR protocol.
PCR 1:
(barcode: CTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT)
>forward (seg1):<barcode>AGGGTCGGCTAGCCATATG
>forward (seg2):<barcode>GCCGGGTCAGAAAACCGAA
>forward (seg3):<barcode>ATCCAACTGCACGGTCCG
>forward (seg4):<barcode>GGTTCCGAATCTCGTTTCTTTG
>reverse: CTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCTCATCTACACTGTTGTTATCAGATCT
The PCR product for each population (expressed and top 15% of binders for each of the four libraries) was cleaned using Agencourt AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and 1 μl from a 1:10 dilution was taken to the next PCR step for index labeling using KAPA Hifi DNA-polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, London, England):
>forward: AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGC
>reverse: CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT<index>GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGC
Top 15% - index: CAATAGTC
Expressed - index: TTGAGCCT
All the primers were ordered as PAGE-purified oligos. The concentration of the PCR product was measured using Qu-bit assay (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York).
Deep-sequencing runs
DNA samples were run on an Illumina MiSeq using 150-bp paired-end kits. The FASTQ sequence files were obtained for each run, and customized scripts were used to generate the selection heat maps from the data as previously described22. Briefly, the script starts by translating the DNA sequence to amino acid sequence; eliminates sequences that harbor more than one amino acid mutation relative to wild type and also sequences that failed the QC test; counts each variant in each population; and eliminates variants with fewer than 100 counts in the reference population (to reduce statistical uncertainty).
Sequencing analysis
To derive the mutational landscapes, we computed the frequency pi,j of each mutant relative to wild-type in the selected and reference pools, where i is the position and j is the substitution, relative to wild-type:
(Eq. 1) |
where count is the number of reads for each mutant. The selection coefficients were then computed as the ratio:
(Eq. 2) |
where selected refers to the top 15% binding population and reference refers to the reference population (Expression). The resulting Si,j values were then transformed to fold-enrichment values by:
(Eq. 3) |
Computational methods
All Rosetta design simulations used git version fb77c732b4f08b6c30572a2ef7760ad3bb4535ca of the Rosetta biomolecular modeling software, which is freely available to academics at http://www.rosettacommons.org. RosettaScripts26 and command lines are available in Supplemental Data.
We refined the RH5-bound basigin structure (PDB entry: 4U0Q) by four iterations of side-chain packing and side-chain and backbone minimization27.
The experimental mutation tolerance map was used to define a sequence space with all beneficial mutations, followed by a combinatorial sequence optimization. Starting from the refined structure, we imposed coordinate restraints relative to the coordinates in the PDB entry and implemented four iterations of sequence design, sidechain, and backbone minimization, while alternating soft and hard repulsive potentials27. The energy difference between the refined structure and the optimized high-affinity mutant was calculated using the talaris2014 energy function28.
BSG and BSGdes7 production and purification
BSG and BSGdes7 were transformed into pet21 H-Tev plasmid by RF cloning29. E. coli strain Origami B(DE3) cells were induced with 1 mM (0.2mM for BSGdes7) IPTG at OD600 = 0.6, transferred to 20 °C (16 °C for BSGdes7) and harvested after 20 h. The cells were sonicated at 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl, following centrifugation at 20,000g for 1 hour. Next, the supernatant was loaded on nickel gravity column, washed with 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl and 20mM imidazole and eluted with 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl and 300mM imidazole. The eluted sample was dialyzed overnight at 4°C in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl. To remove the His-tag, Tev-His was added at 4°C overnight. On the following day, the protein with Tev-His was loaded on nickel gravity column and eluted with 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl and 20mM imidazole and purified by gel filtration over a HiLoad 26/260 superdex 75 pg column.
Apparent Tm and aggregation onset measurements
All experiments were performed on a ViiA 7 real-time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). BSG and BSGdes7 were diluted to 10 μM in a 1:5,000 dilution of SYPRO Orange in HBS and 20 μL of the solution was measured. The temperature was ramped from 25 °C to 100 °C at 0.05 °C/s.
Surface-plasmon resonance
Surface plasmon resonance experiments on BSG and BSGdes7 were carried out on a Biacore T200 instrument (GE Healthcare) at 25 °C with HBS-N EP+ (10 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.005% vol/vol surfactant P20 [pH 7.4]). For binding analysis, 1,000 response units (RU) of PfRH5ΔNL10 were captured on a CM5 sensor chip. Samples of different protein concentrations were injected over the surface at a flow rate of 30 μL/min for 500 s, and the chip was washed with buffer for 2,000 s. If necessary, surface regeneration was performed with 30 s injection of 4M Urea (BSGdes7) at a flow rate of 30 μL/min. One flow cell contained no ligand and was used as a reference. The acquired data were analyzed using the device’s software, and due to the very slow dissociation rates of BSGdes7, only kinetic analyses were performed.
Parasite culture
Parasite line NF54 was used for the growth assay (generously provided by Malaria Research Reference Reagent Resource Center [MR4]), while parasite line D10-PHG was used for the merozoite invasion assay30. Parasites were grown in pooled (A+/A+) donor RBCs provided by the Israeli blood bank (Magen David Adom blood donations in Israel) at 4% hematocrit and incubated at 37 °C in a gas mixture of 1% O2, 5% CO2 in N2. Parasites were maintained in RPMI medium pH 7.4, 25 mg/ml HEPES, 50 μg/ml hypoxanthine, 2 mg/ml sodium bicarbonate, 20 μg/ml gentamicin and 0.5% AlbumaxII31. P. falciparum cultures were tested for mycoplasma once a month using a commercially available kit (Mycoplasma Detection Kit—QuickTest [Tivanbiotech]).
Growth assays
NF54 parasites were plated at 1% trophs, 4% hematocrit in 6-well plates with 2 mL total medium. Following a 3 hr recovery, treatments were introduced and parasitemia was monitored using FACS. Parasites were stained with nuclear dye Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) titrated to 2-4 μM and RNA dye Thiazole Orange (Sigma) was diluted 1:100000 from 1 mg/ml stock. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Parasitemia was monitored over two growth cycles, and qualitative evaluation was done with Giemsa smears.
Merozoite invasion assays
Parasites were grown in O+ donor RBCs. Merozoite assays were performed as previously described32. In brief, late-stage parasites were magnetically purified using the Magnetic Cell Separation (MACS) system (Miltenyi Biotec), then incubated in culture medium supplemented with 10 μM E64 for <4 hours. Parasites were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1,900xg and resuspended in a small volume of culture medium, before rupturing using a 1.2-μm syringe filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech). Merozoites were rapidly added to erythrocytes that were pre-incubated with additives: buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl); heparin (a known invasion inhibitor); or BSG or BSGdes7 protein at two concentrations (189 μg/ml and 38 μg/ml). After 12 hours, erythrocytes were washed in PBS, stained for 20 minutes in the dark with SYBRGreen (1:2,000 in PBS; Sigma-Aldrich), then washed again three times before analysis on a BD Fortessa flow cytometer. 100,000 cells per sample were acquired using the FITC channel.
Growth-inhibitory assays
GIAs were performed using 3D7 clone P. falciparum parasites, including monoclonal antibody controls12), as previously described15.
Results
Mutational tolerance mapping of basigin
Following visual inspection of the RH5-basigin molecular structure (Protein Data Bank [PDB] entry: 4u0q), we selected 64 positions on the two N-terminal immunoglobulin domains of basigin for deep mutational scanning. The positions comprised the entire RH5-binding surface as well as second-shell positions (Fig. 1a).
The basigin fragment and the single-point mutants were cloned into a yeast-display vector25, expressed on the yeast cell-surface, and incubated with biotinylated RH5 (at 725 nM concentration, approximately ½ of the wild-type dissociation constant)20. We then used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to select the top 15% of the binding population25 (Fig. 1b). To measure the baseline propensities of each mutant in the starting library, we also screened the expressed population without selecting for binding20. Plasmids from both populations were purified, PCR-amplified, and subjected to single-read deep sequencing, resulting in 8.4 million high-quality reads. We then determined the enrichment ratio for each mutant relative to human basigin in both the affinity-selected and baseline populations (Fig. 1c). Four mutations that resulted in substantial improvements in affinity occurred at the core of the RH5-binding surface (Val26Ile, Gln100Ile, His102Tyr, and Ser190Gln), whereas three others were in the periphery (Thr29Ser, Val30Ala, and Gln164Phe). Two of these positions (100 and 102) form close atomic contacts with one another, suggesting that multipoint mutations at least in these positions may exhibit complex epistatic relationships33.
Past applications of deep mutational scanning to improve binding affinity used an iterative experimental selection of high-affinity variants from libraries comprising combinations of affinity-enhancing mutations19,21,34. Here, instead, we tested whether Rosetta design could circumvent such iterative experimental screening by finding a single optimal combination of affinity-enhancing mutations. We started by identifying nine positions on the RH5-binding surface in which mutations exhibited at least fourfold enrichment relative to the wild-type identity according to deep mutational scanning. We then used Rosetta to find an optimal combination of mutations within this set. The theoretical sequence space of all combinations of mutations at nine positions is very large (1012 different sequences), whereas the space of affinity-enhancing variants as inferred from deep mutational scanning is much smaller (14,400 sequences; Table 1), thus focusing design calculations on a small set of sequences that are likely to be enriched for improved binding affinity. In preliminary calculations, we noticed that the design procedure converged on variants that were at most three mutations relative to human basigin, reflecting the tendency of design algorithms to favor the crystallographically determined structure33,35,36. To force additional mutations, we visually inspected the basigin-RH5 structure and eliminated the wild-type identities from the design choices at six of the nine positions that appeared permissive to mutation and used Rosetta to find an optimal combination of the remaining mutations. This resulted in a single design, comprising seven mutations that we called BSGdes7 (Table 1).
Table 1.
Position | 26 | 29 | 30 | 98 | 100 | 102 | 129 | 164 | 190 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSG | V | T | V | N | Q | H | E | Q | S |
Sequence space | I | GSRAN | ALV | RAMCN | IMRAVL | FY | GE | FI | QMRF |
BSGdes7 | I | S | A | N | I | Y | E | F | Q |
We noted that most of the mutations in BSGdes7 relative to wild type (4 out of 7) were not ranked as the most enriched in the deep mutational scanning experiment (Table 1); indeed, at position 98, the least favored identity (out of five) was selected by Rosetta. We used Rosetta design calculations to force the design of the most-favored mutation according to the experiment at each of the seven positions, finding that this design exhibited energy that was higher (worse) by a substantial 7 Rosetta energy units compared to BSGdes7. Thus, although the deep mutational scanning data are essential for focusing design calculations on a productive subset of the theoretical sequence space, the ranking of mutants according to the experiment may not be accurate enough for predicting favorable multipoint mutant combinations.
BSGdes7 exhibits almost 1,900-fold higher affinity for RH5
We solubly expressed BSGdes7 and measured its affinity for RH5 using surface-plasmon resonance (SPR). Strikingly, BSGdes7 exhibited 1,900-fold higher affinity for RH5 compared to human basigin (KD=1.15 and 2,200 nM, respectively). The kinetic analysis suggested that the main difference in affinity came from a vast decrease in binding off-rate (0.23 h-1 compared to 0.13 s-1) (Fig. 2a). SPR single-cycle kinetic analysis confirmed the very large affinity improvement, though with a twofold higher KD = 3.3 nM (Fig. S1). A comparison of the structure of BSG and the model of BSGdes7 revealed that the design increased the hydrophobicity at the core of the interface through the introduction of two radical polar-to-hydrophobic mutations (Gln100Ile and His102Tyr) providing a likely explanation for the vast improvement in affinity (Fig 2b). Examination of the experimental mutation-tolerance map suggested that the human identities at these positions, particularly position 100, are likely to be suboptimal for binding RH537; for instance, nearly all aliphatic point mutations at position 100 relative to human BSG exhibited large gains in affinity. Other mutations in BSGdes7 relative to BSG, for instance, Ser190Gln, improved polar interactions across the binding interface. Thus, we concluded that owing to the suboptimal molecular contacts across the BSG-RH5 interface, large gains in affinity could be readily designed.
The introduction of seven simultaneous mutations could severely destabilize the protein38. We found, however, that BSGdes7 exhibited a high apparent melting temperature (50 °C compared to 55 °C for BSG), demonstrating that the design procedure maintained protein stability (Fig. 2c). Indeed, the small reduction in thermal stability is to be expected given the radical nature of some of the mutations (Table 1).
BSGdes7 improves growth-inhibitory concentrations
Encouraged by the large improvement in affinity, we next tested the ability of BSGdes7 to inhibit the invasion of P. falciparum parasites (NF54 strain) to human red blood cells. We started by measuring parasitemia levels for parasites incubated with human BSG or BSGdes7 at three concentrations using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) following two invasion cycles. A clear decrease in parasitemia was evident for cultures treated with 1 μM concentration of the design, as was measured by both FACS analysis39 and Giemsa smears (Fig 3a). Importantly, five-day treatment with BSGdes7 eliminated live invading parasites (no evidence for ring-stage parasites).
To confirm that invasion is the step where the parasite life cycle is inhibited by BSG and BSGdes7, we tested the direct effect on invasion by adding merozoites to red blood cells that were pretreated with BSGdes7 or BSG. Both proteins inhibited invasion, with BSGdes7 observed to be slightly more potent (Fig. 3b).
We next used assays of growth-inhibition activity (GIA) to assess the inhibitory concentration of BSGdes7, finding that it exhibited an inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 5 μM, compared to only 50 μM for human basigin (Fig. 3c). Although the tenfold improvement in inhibitory concentration was encouraging, it was substantially less than expected based solely on the three orders of magnitude improvement in affinity. This result is consistent with suggestions made previously that growth inhibition depends crucially on binding on-rate, and indeed, antibody 2AC7, which exhibits 24-fold higher binding on-rate12 compared to BSGdes7 also inhibits parasitemia with nearly 200-fold improved inhibitory constant. Therefore, we concluded that substantial improvement in growth-inhibitory concentrations would demand improvements in binding on rate or potentially the fusion of multiple BSGdes7 monomers to generate an avid inhibitor6.
Discussion
Many host-pathogen interactions are transient and therefore exhibit only low affinity. Furthermore, host proteins are highly unlikely to have been evolutionarily selected for high-affinity interactions with the pathogen; it is far more likely that selection pressures operated if at all, to weaken interactions with pathogens. Host target proteins, therefore, provide potential starting points for engineering and design of potent inhibitors of cell invasion. In this study, we demonstrated a straightforward path for substantial improvement of affinities through systematic mutation analysis followed by one-shot design calculations. Our structural analysis demonstrated that indeed much of the binding surface on basigin, including at the very core of its interaction with RH5, is suboptimal, and that mutations can readily improve binding affinity. In an in vivo setting, it would be essential to verify that such design does not lead to undesired side effects due to interactions with other host proteins or to an immune reaction.
The large increase in binding affinity translated, however, to only a tenfold improvement in inhibitory concentration. Recent analyses of anti-RH5 antibody binding kinetics and inhibitory concentrations suggested that binding on-rate makes an essential contribution to inhibition12. Red-blood-cell invasion by parasites is a very fast process (10-30 seconds)40, meaning that the exposure of RH5 to serum is short and that inhibitors must engage RH5 quickly in order to block invasion. Our results also do not exclude the possibility that the design binds off-target proteins in serum or on the parasite, leading to a lower effective concentration. BSGdes7 may be used as a starting point to increase RH5-binding on-rate in order to produce an effective parasitemia blocker.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
SJF and NRR are supported by a research grant from the Benoziyo Endowment Fund for the Advancement of Science. SJF is additionally supported by a European Research Council Consolidator Grant (713255) and by a gift from Sam Switzer and family. O.L. is supported by a Ph.D. scholarship from the UK Medical Research Council (MR/K501281/1). K.E.W. is supported through a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (107366/Z/15/Z). Research in the Baum lab is supported by an Investigator Award to JB from Wellcome (100993/Z/13/Z). M.K.H. is a Wellcome Investigator. S.J.D. is a Jenner Investigator; a Lister Institute Research Prize Fellow and a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellow (106917/Z/15/Z).
References
- 1.Organization WH. World Malaria Report 2015. World Health Organization; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goldberg DE, Siliciano RF, Jacobs WR., Jr Outwitting evolution: fighting drug-resistant TB, malaria, and HIV. Cell. 2012;148(6):1271–1283. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Draper SJ, Angov E, Horii T, et al. Recent advances in recombinant protein-based malaria vaccines. Vaccine. 2015;33(52):7433–7443. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Douglas AD, Williams AR, Illingworth JJ, et al. The blood-stage malaria antigen PfRH5 is susceptible to vaccine-inducible cross-strain neutralizing antibody. Nat Commun. 2011;2:601. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baum J, Chen L, Healer J, et al. Reticulocyte-binding protein homologue 5--an essential adhesin involved in invasion of human erythrocytes by Plasmodium falciparum. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39(3):371–380. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Crosnier C, Bustamante LY, Bartholdson SJ, et al. Basigin is a receptor essential for erythrocyte invasion by Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2011;480(7378):534–537. doi: 10.1038/nature10606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bustamante LY, Bartholdson SJ, Crosnier C, et al. A full-length recombinant Plasmodium falciparum PfRH5 protein induces inhibitory antibodies that are effective across common PfRH5 genetic variants. Vaccine. 2013;31(2):373–379. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Williams AR, Douglas AD, Miura K, et al. Enhancing blockade of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte invasion: assessing combinations of antibodies against PfRH5 and other merozoite antigens. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(11):e1002991. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Manske M, Miotto O, Campino S, et al. Analysis of Plasmodium falciparum diversity in natural infections by deep sequencing. Nature. 2012;487(7407):375–379. doi: 10.1038/nature11174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wright KE, Hjerrild KA, Bartlett J, et al. Structure of malaria invasion protein RH5 with erythrocyte basigin and blocking antibodies. Nature. 2014;515(7527):427–430. doi: 10.1038/nature13715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Douglas AD, Baldeviano GC, Lucas CM, et al. A PfRH5-based vaccine is efficacious against heterologous strain blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum infection in aotus monkeys. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(1):130–139. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Douglas AD, Williams AR, Knuepfer E, et al. Neutralization of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites by antibodies against PfRH5. J Immunol. 2014;192(1):245–258. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Payne RO, Silk SE, Elias SC, et al. Human vaccination against RH5 induces neutralizing antimalarial antibodies that inhibit RH5 invasion complex interactions. JCI Insight. 2017;2(21) doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.96381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen L, Xu Y, Healer J, et al. Crystal structure of PfRh5, an essential P. falciparum ligand for invasion of human erythrocytes. Elife. 2014;3 doi: 10.7554/eLife.04187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Campeotto I, Goldenzweig A, Davey J, et al. One-step design of a stable variant of the malaria invasion protein RH5 for use as a vaccine immunogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(5):998–1002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616903114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Conte LL, Chothia C, Janin J, Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol. 1999;285(5):2177–2198. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wong W, Huang R, Menant S, et al. Structure of Plasmodium falciparum Rh5-CyRPA-Ripr invasion complex. Nature. 2019;565(7737):118–121. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0779-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fowler DM, Araya CL, Fleishman SJ, et al. High-resolution mapping of protein sequence-function relationships. Nat Methods. 2010;7(9):741–746. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Whitehead TA, Chevalier A, Song Y, et al. Optimization of affinity, specificity and function of designed influenza inhibitors using deep sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(6):543–548. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Whitehead TA, Baker D, Fleishman SJ. Computational design of novel protein binders and experimental affinity maturation. Methods Enzymol. 2013;523:1–19. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394292-0.00001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schreiber G, Fleishman SJ. Computational design of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2013;23(6):903–910. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Elazar A, Weinstein J, Biran I, Fridman Y, Bibi E, Fleishman SJ. Mutational scanning reveals the determinants of protein insertion and association energetics in the plasma membrane. Elife. 2016;5 doi: 10.7554/eLife.12125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu H, Naismith JH. An efficient one-step site-directed deletion, insertion, single and multiple-site plasmid mutagenesis protocol. BMC Biotechnol. 2008;8:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-8-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. Frozen competent yeast cells that can be transformed with high efficiency using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(1):1–4. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chao G, Lau WL, Hackel BJ, Sazinsky SL, Lippow SM, Wittrup KD. Isolating and engineering human antibodies using yeast surface display. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):755–768. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fleishman SJ, Leaver-Fay A, Corn JE, et al. RosettaScripts: a scripting language interface to the Rosetta macromolecular modeling suite. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Goldenzweig A, Goldsmith M, Hill SE, et al. Automated Structure- and Sequence-Based Design of Proteins for High Bacterial Expression and Stability. Mol Cell. 2018;70(2):380. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.O’Meara MJ, Leaver-Fay A, Tyka MD, et al. Combined covalent-electrostatic model of hydrogen bonding improves structure prediction with Rosetta. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11(2):609–622. doi: 10.1021/ct500864r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Unger T, Jacobovitch Y, Dantes A, Bernheim R, Peleg Y. Applications of the Restriction Free (RF) cloning procedure for molecular manipulations and protein expression. J Struct Biol. 2010;172(1):34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wilson DW, Crabb BS, Beeson JG. Development of fluorescent Plasmodium falciparum for in vitro growth inhibition assays. Malar J. 2010;9:152. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Trager W, Jensen JB. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science. 1976;193(4254):673–675. doi: 10.1126/science.781840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Boyle MJ, Wilson DW, Richards JS, et al. Isolation of viable Plasmodium falciparum merozoites to define erythrocyte invasion events and advance vaccine and drug development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14378–14383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009198107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Khersonsky O, Lipsh R, Avizemer Z, et al. Automated Design of Efficient and Functionally Diverse Enzyme Repertoires. Mol Cell. 2018;72(1):178–186.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Leung I, Dekel A, Shifman JM, Sidhu SS. Saturation scanning of ubiquitin variants reveals a common hot spot for binding to USP2 and USP21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(31):8705–8710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524648113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Netzer R, Listov D, Lipsh R, et al. Ultrahigh specificity in a network of computationally designed protein-interaction pairs. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5286. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07722-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fleishman SJ, Whitehead TA, Ekiert DC, et al. Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. Science. 2011;332(6031):816–821. doi: 10.1126/science.1202617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ferreiro DU, Komives EA, Wolynes PG. Frustration in Biomolecules. Q Rev Biophys. 2013;47(4):1–97. doi: 10.1017/S0033583514000092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goldenzweig A, Fleishman SJ. Principles of Protein Stability and Their Application in Computational Design. Annu Rev Biochem. 2018;87:105–129. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dekel E, Rivkin A, Heidenreich M, et al. Identification and classification of the malaria parasite blood developmental stages, using imaging flow cytometry. Methods. 2017;112:157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Weiss GE, Crabb BS, Gilson PR. Overlaying Molecular and Temporal Aspects of Malaria Parasite Invasion. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32(4):284–295. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.