Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2019 Nov 11;203(12):3313–3324. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900770

Chronic ethanol consumption reduces existing CD8 T cell memory and is associated with lesions in protection against secondary influenza A virus infections

Zeb R Zacharias *, Kevin L Legge *,
PMCID: PMC6904436  NIHMSID: NIHMS1541254  PMID: 31712384

Abstract

Chronic alcohol consumption is associated with increased incidence of disease severity during pulmonary infections. Our previous work in a mouse model of chronic alcohol consumption has detailed that the primary influenza A virus (IAV)-specific CD8 T cell response in mice that consumed ethanol had reduced proliferative capacity as well as the ability to kill IAV-target cells. Interestingly, recent studies have highlighted that human alcoholics have increased susceptibility to IAV infections, even though they likely possess pre-existing immunity to IAV. However, the effects of chronic alcohol consumption on pre-existing immune responses (i.e. memory) to IAV have not been explored. Our results presented herein show that IAV-immune mice that then chronically consumed alcohol (X31➞EtOH) exhibited increased morbidity and mortality following IAV re-exposure compared to IAV-immune mice that had consumed water (X31➞H2O). This increased susceptibility in X31➞EtOH mice was associated with reduced IAV-specific killing of target cells and a reduction in the number of IAV-specific CD8 T cells within the lungs. Furthermore, upon IAV challenge recruitment of the remaining memory IAV-specific CD8 T cells into the lungs is reduced in X31➞EtOH mice. This altered recruitment is associated with a reduced pulmonary expression of CXCL10 and CXCL11, which are chemokines that are important for T cell recruitment to the lungs. Overall these results demonstrate chronic alcohol consumption negatively affects the resting memory CD8 T cell response and reduces the ability of memory T cells to be recruited to the site of infection upon subsequent exposures, therein contributing to an enhanced susceptibility to IAV infections.

Keywords: Alcoholism, influenza virus, adaptive immunity, CD8 T cell memory

Introduction

The abuse of alcohol by humans represents a significant health concern causing 1 in 20 deaths, worldwide (1). These deaths are due, in part, to the increased risk of severe pulmonary bacterial and viral infections that are associated with chronic alcohol consumption (2-6). A primary cause for the increased risk of severe pulmonary disease is the detrimental impacts that alcohol abuse has on the immune system. In humans that chronically abuse alcohol as well as following short periods of binge drinking, significant reductions in the numbers of T cells and B cells have been documented (2, 7, 8). This alcohol-induced lymphopenic state has been recapitulated in both rodent and non-human primate models of chronic ethanol (EtOH) consumption (2, 9-13). Although the overall reduced number in immune cell precursors likely contributes to disease severity following an infection, studies utilizing animal models of chronic EtOH consumption have revealed impairments in the development and function of pathogen-specific adaptive immune responses. During influenza A virus (IAV) infection in mice that chronically consume EtOH, the few primary effector IAV-specific CD8 T cells that do develop have a significantly reduced proliferative capacity, decreased cytotoxicity, and decreased production of interferon γ (14). This likely contributes to the increased magnitude and duration of a primary IAV infection observed in chronic EtOH consuming mice (10).

While studies have detailed the negative impacts of chronic alcohol consumption on the steady-state and developing immune responses during a primary infection, much remains unknown concerning the effects of chronic ethanol on pre-existing immune memory responses. Interestingly, heavy alcohol use in humans is associated with increases in the risk of severe IAV-associated disease (15). In part, this increase in disease may be related to the evidence discussed above of the lesions within the primary effector IAV-specific immune response; however, considering that the highest rates of alcohol dependence occur in adulthood (49), the issue becomes far more complex as these individuals likely had pre-existing T cell immunity. Studies show that there is a high prevalence of pre-existing T cell immune memory to IAV within the general population (16-19), including resident T cell memory within the lungs (20-23). Furthermore, studies examining immunity and protection during the 2009 IAV pandemic suggest that individuals that had pre-existing cross-reactive T cell immunity were more resistant to severe IAV-associated disease compared to those that did not (24-26). Thus, these studies indicate that chronic alcohol consumption may create additional lesions in pre-existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell immunity. Therefore, we determined the consequences of chronic alcohol consumption on existing memory CD8 T cell-mediated protection against IAV.

The composition of the CD8 T cell memory pool established following a primary infection consists of four known subsets. T central memory cells (TCM) express both CD62L and CCR7, allowing them to traffic into the lymph nodes where they undergo rapid proliferation upon pathogen re-exposure. Conversely, T effector memory cells (TEM) are absent from the lymph node due to their lack of expression of both CD62L and CCR7, and instead scan peripheral tissues, exhibiting potent cytotoxicity (27-29). In recent studies, a third subset termed T peripheral memory cells (TPM) was identified that shares the proliferative capacity of TCM as well as the cytotoxic capabilities of TEM upon subsequent pathogen exposures. These three subsets are defined based on their expression of CX3CR1 and CD27, with TCM (CX3CR1loCD27hi), TEM (CX3CR1hiCD27lo), and TPM (CX3CR1intCD27hi) differentially expressing these surface markers (30). While it is known that both TCM and TEM contribute to protection against IAV infection, the role that TPM play has not been determined. However, it is likely that TPM contribute to protection against IAV infection as they have been observed within the lung tissue (30). The fourth subset, known as tissue-resident memory cells (TRM), are embedded within peripheral tissues, and act as a first-line of defense by rapidly responding upon pathogen re-exposure (31-34). This subset is distinguished from cells within the vasculature by intravascular (i.v.) antibody labeling and phenotypically characterized in the lungs by the expression of CD69 and CD103 (27, 35-37). Although originally characterized in animal models, highly proliferative and polyfunctional IAV-specific TRM have also been identified within the human lung (21, 38, 39). Studies reveal that TRM within the lung are important for mediating heterosubtypic protection, as mice lacking lung TRM exhibit increased morbidity and mortality following heterologous IAV challenge (40, 41). Overall these studies indicate that multiple T cell memory subsets contribute to protection against secondary IAV infection and could be negatively impacted by chronic alcohol consumption.

Our results demonstrate that chronic EtOH exposure of IAV-immune mice increased morbidity and mortality upon a secondary IAV infection compared to IAV-immune H2O control mice. Our findings further demonstrate alterations in the IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory response in IAV-immune EtOH mice compared to IAV-immune H2O control mice. Upon re-exposure with IAV, we observed that IAV-immune EtOH mice had reduced accumulation of IAV-specific CD8 T cells within the lungs compared to IAV-immune H2O controls. This reduced accumulation was associated with lower levels of two important CD8 T cell chemoattractants (CXCL10 and CXCL11) within the lungs. Overall, our findings highlight that chronic EtOH consumption negatively impacts existing T cell immunity to IAV infection and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality during a secondary exposure to IAV.

Materials and Methods

Mice

Six- to eight-week-old wild-type (WT) C57Bl/6 mice were originally obtained from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). B6.Cg-Tcratm1MomTg(TcrLCMV) 372Sdz CD90.1 (P14) mice whose T cells express a T cell receptor specific for the GP33 epitope of LCMV were a kind gift from Dr. John T. Harty from the University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA). Mice were bred, housed, and maintained in the animal care facilities at the University of Iowa. All procedures performed were approved by and adhered to the regulatory standards and guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Iowa.

IAV infection

Mouse adapted laboratory strains of X31, A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8), and PR8-GP33 (generated and kindly gifted by Dr. Ryan Langlois at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) were prepared from stocks as previously described (42). X31-GP33 was a kind gift from Dr. Steven Varga at the University of Iowa. Prior to intranasal (i.n.) infections, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. The following doses of IAV strains were administered i.n. in 50μL of Iscove’s medium: 0.1LD50 (1.11×102 TCIU50) or 5LD50 (5.54×103 TCIU50) A/Puerto Rico/8/34; 1.20×103 TCIU50 X31; 1.37×104 TCIU50 X31-GP33; 2×104 TCIU50 PR8-GP33.

Ethanol administration

Mice were administered ethanol using the Meadows-Cook model (10, 13, 43-45). Briefly, mice were acclimated to pharmaceutical grade ethanol supplemented in distilled water at the following concentrations: 10% for two days, 15% for five days, and 20% for seven weeks. These ethanol solutions were the only source of drinking fluid available to the ethanol group. Control animals received the same distilled water utilized for the ethanol solutions. Mice had free access to the appropriate drinking solution as well as laboratory chow during the treatment period. Once administered, mice were maintained on their respective drinking fluid through the remainder of the study (i.e. following IAV infection).

In vivo cytotoxicity assay

Procedures for the in vivo cytotoxicity assay were modified from the procedures previously described (46). Splenocytes from C57Bl/6 mice were resuspended in 14% Nycodenz (Axis-Shield, Oslo, Norway) that was overlaid with an equal volume of Iscove’s medium. Splenocytes were centrifuged at 2200 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C without brake or start assist. Mononuclear cells were isolated from the interface and labeled with 2μM PKH-26 (Sigma-Aldrich) at room temperature for five minutes. PKH-26 labeled mononuclear cells were split into two groups: one group was labeled with 1μM CFSE (CFSElo) and the other was labeled with 3μM CFSE (CFSEhi) at room temperature for ten minutes. Labeling reactions were neutralized by adding equal volumes of fetal bovine serum (FBS). CFSEhi and CFSElo cells were pulsed with 10μM of OVA257 or 10μM IAV NP366 peptides for 30 minutes at 37°C, respectively. CFSEhi and CFSElo were mixed 1:1 and 50,000 cells were adoptively transferred intranasally into test mice. The ratio of CFSEhi:CFSElo cells was determined eight hours after transfer. Percent specific killing was determined by the following equation ([100 - (%CFSElo cells/%CFSEhi cells)]) and normalized to naïve controls.

Intravascular cell labeling

Cells within the vasculature and tissue were distinguished using an intravascular stain as previously described (35). Briefly, mice received 1μg of fluorophore-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD45.2 (clone 104; BioLegend, San Diego, CA) in 200μL of PBS by retroorbital intravenous injection three minutes prior to euthanasia.

Major histocompatibility complex class I tetramers

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I tetramers specific for the H-2D(b) restricted influenza A virus nucleocapsid protein epitope NP366-374/ASNENMETM were obtained from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease MHC Tetramer Core Facility (Atlanta, GA).

Flow cytometry

Lungs and lung draining lymph nodes (dLN) were harvested and digested for 30 minutes at 37°C in medium containing 1mg/mL Collagenase (Type 3; MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH) and 0.02 mg/mL DNase-I (MP Biomedicals). Single cell suspensions were made and 1×106 cells/well were plated in 96-well round bottom plates. Cells were blocked with 2% rat and hamster serum for 30 minutes at 4°C. After blocking, antigen experienced CD8 T cells were identified as previously described (47). The following antibodies were used to identify antigen experienced CD8 T cell memory subsets: rat anti-mouse CD8α (53-6.7; BioLegend), rat anti-mouse CD11a (M17/4; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), rat anti-mouse CD103 (M290; BD Biosciences), rat anti-mouse CD69 (H1.2F3; eBioscience), rat anti-mouse CD127 (A7R34; BD Biosciences), rat anti-mouse CD62L (MEL-14; BioLegend), hamster anti-mouse KLRG1 (2F1/KLRG1; BioLegend), mouse anti-mouse CX3CR1 (SA011F11, BioLegend), and hamster anti-mouse CD27 (LG.3A10, BioLegend). Cells were fixed with BD FACS™ Lysing Solution per the manufacturer’s instructions and resuspended in PBS. Data were acquired on a LSRII (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).

Chemokine assay

Prior to euthanasia, blood was collected in non-heparinized capillary tubes (Fisher Scientific) and serum was collected as previously described (48). Lungs were homogenized using a Dounce tissue homogenizer and homogenates were purified by centrifugation. Serum and lung lysates were stored at −80°C until analysis. Serum and lung lysate samples were analyzed using the Bio-Plex Pro™ Mouse Chemokine Panel 33-Plex (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were acquired on a Bio-Plex 200 (Bio-Rad).

Statistical analysis

Experiments were repeated at least twice unless noted otherwise. All statistical analysis listed below were performed using GraphPad Prism software (La Jolla, CA). Comparisons between two groups was performed with a two-tailed student’s t-test. Comparisons between more than two groups at different time points were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparison post-hoc test. Comparisons between more than two groups at a single time point were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test. Survival comparisons were analyzed using a Mantel-Cox Log Rank test. A P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Chronic ethanol consumption increases disease severity following secondary IAV infection

To determine the effects of chronic alcohol consumption on memory CD8 T cell-mediated immune protection against a secondary IAV infection, mice that were previously infected with a sublethal dose of IAV-X31 (H3N2) eight weeks prior were placed on 20% ethanol in distilled water (X31-immune→EtOH) using the Meadows-Cook protocol or distilled water alone (X31-immune→H2O) for eight weeks (Figure 1A). IAV-X31 is a reassortant virus that contains the HA and NA gene segments from a H3N2 virus, while the remaining six gene segments are on an IAV-PR8 (H1N1) backbone. This allowed us to subsequently challenge X31-immune mice with IAV-PR8, to avoid HA3 and NA2- mediated antibody neutralization of the challenge infection, and ascertain the contribution of CD8 T cells to immunity and protection. Following the PR8 challenge, we observed substantial weight loss in naïve mice regardless of water or EtOH exposure (Figure 1B). However, similar to previous studies (10, 14), we observed that naïve EtOH consuming mice (Naïve →EtOH) exhibited enhanced mortality compared to naïve water consuming mice (Naïve→H2O) (Figure 1C). As expected, disease associated weight loss was significantly ameliorated in X31-immune→H2O compared to Naïve→H2O and Naïve→EtOH mice; however, X31-immune→EtOH mice showed increased weight loss compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 1B). Although no differences in mortality were observed for X31-immune→H2O and X31-immune→EtOH mice challenged with a 0.1LD50 exposure (Figure 1C), the increased weight loss in X31-immune→EtOH mice suggests that EtOH-induced deficits have occurred that decrease the ability to control IAV reinfection. To probe this lesion further, we determined the capabilities of mice to control an infection with a high-dose challenge (5LD50) of PR8, which mimics the severity of many pandemic IAV infections. The high pathogenicity of this dose of PR8 was apparent as all naïve mice succumbed to the infection by day 10 (Figure 1E). While there were no differences in weight loss, 80% of X31-immune→EtOH mice succumbed to the high-dose PR8 challenge compared to 0% mortality in the X31-immune→H2O group (Figure 1D & 1E). Given the known role in CD8 T cell mediated protection against subsequent heterologous IAV exposures(40, 41), these data suggest that chronic EtOH consumption may negatively impact pre-existing IAV-specific immunity and increase susceptibility to disease associated morbidity and mortality during subsequent IAV exposure.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Chronic ethanol consumption detrimentally impacts susceptibility to influenza A virus infection in IAV-immune mice. (A) C57BL/6 mice were infected with 1.20×103 TCIU50 of X31 (H3N2) and allowed to establish immune memory for 8 weeks. At 8 weeks post X31 infection, mice were placed on the Meadows-Cook ethanol protocol or distilled water for 8 weeks. At 16 weeks post X31 infection, mice were challenged with either a (B,C) 1.11×102 TCIU50 or a (D, E) 5.54×103 TCIU50 dose of heterologous A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8; H1N1) and (B, D) weight loss and (C, E) survival were monitored. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Data are from one independent experiment with n= 5 mice/group. X31→H2O vs. Naïve→H2O: ‡ P < 0.05; X31→H2O vs. X31→EtOH: † P < 0.05; X31→EtOH vs. Naïve→H2O: *P < 0.05 (Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons test).

Pre-existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell responses are reduced following chronic ethanol exposure

The increased susceptibility of X31-immune→EtOH mice to PR8 infection indicates deficiencies within the IAV-specific memory T cell response. Previous studies from our laboratory have associated defects in cytotoxic IAV-specific CD8 T cells with increased susceptibility and duration of a primary IAV infection in EtOH consuming mice (10, 14). As the challenge PR8 (H1N1) virus should evade the neutralizing X31-specific antibody response (i.e. H3N2) generated by the prior X31 infection, B cell responses are likely not contributing to the protection observed following PR8 infection of X31-immune mice. Thus, the deficiency in the IAV-specific memory response instead likely resides within the memory CD8 T cell compartment. To determine if limitations in cytotoxicity are present in the memory IAV-specific CD8 T immune response, we utilized an in vivo cytotoxicity assay. In both Naïve→H2O and Naïve→EtOH mice, we observed no killing of target cells as equal frequencies of IAV peptide-pulsed (CFSElo) and control OVA peptide-pulsed (CFSEhi) target cells were observed (Figure 2A). This highlights, as expected in non-IAV immune mice, the absence of a cytotoxic IAV-specific CD8 T cell response and that the lung environment of EtOH consuming mice did not result in selective lysis of either target cell population. However, lysis of IAV-specific target cells within the lungs of X31-immune→H2O mice indicates the presence of a localized cytotoxic IAV-specific CD8 T cell response (Figures 2A and 2B). Lysis of IAV-specific target cells was significantly lower in X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figures 2A and 2B), which suggests a defective cytotoxic IAV-specific CD8 T cell response and is consistent with the increased morbidity and mortality observed in X31-immune→EtOH mice upon secondary IAV infection (Figure 1). Since both groups of X31-immune mice should possess similar memory responses prior to EtOH or water exposure, these results suggest that chronic EtOH consumption negatively impacts the overall cytotoxic ability of the pre-existing CD8 T cell memory response.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Chronic ethanol consumption negatively impacts existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell cytotoxic responses. Mice were infected then exposed to EtOH or water as in Figure 1. At 16 weeks post X31 infection, mice received 50,000 target cells i.n. from a 1:1 mixture of IAV NP366 (CFSElo) and OVA257 (CFSEhi) peptide-pulsed splenocytes. Eight hours after i.n. transfer, (A) the ratio of CFSEhi to CFSElo target cells within the lung were determined and (B) percent specific killing was calculated with the following equation: ([100 – (%CFSElo cells/%CFSEhi cells)]). Data were normalized to the ratio/killing observed in Naïve→H2O and Naïve→ EtOH controls. Error bars ± s.e.m. Data are representative of two combined experiments with n= 6-7 mice/group. P values were determined by two-tailed t-test.

The inability of X31-immune→EtOH mice to clear IAV-specific target cells from the lungs suggests a lesion within the IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory compartment. Since total CD8 T cells are numerically lower within human alcoholics and EtOH consuming animal models, we next determined if this numerical reduction extended into X31-immune mice. Consistent with prior findings (10), we observed a significant reduction in the total number of CD8 T cells in the lungs of Naïve→EtOH mice compared to Naïve→H2O mice (Figure 3B). Consistent with the establishment of T cell memory prior to chronic EtOH consumption, total CD8 T cells were increased in the lungs of X31-immune→H2O mice compared to naïve controls. However, subsequent reduction from that memory CD8 T cell set-point occurred in X31-immune→EtOH mice, as these mice had reduced numbers of total CD8 T cells compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 3B). This reduction led to the number of total pulmonary CD8 T cell present in X31-immune→EtOH to be similar to Naïve→H2O controls (Figure 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Numerical loss of existing CD8 T cell memory due to chronic ethanol consumption. Mice were infected then exposed to EtOH or water as in Figure 1. At 16 weeks post X31 infection, lungs were isolated and analyzed. (A) Representative gating strategies to enumerate (B) total CD8 T cells and (C) AgExp CD8 T cells (CD11ahiCD8αlo) within the lungs. (D) Lung-resident AgExp CD8 T cells (CD11ahiCD8αloCD45i.v. Abneg) were determined by i.v. antibody labeling. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Data are representative of three combined experiments with n= 8-15 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 (One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

As EtOH consumption alters naïve CD8 T cells within the lungs (10), it is possible that this reduction in total CD8 T cells in X31-immune→EtOH mice could be due to alterations in the naïve CD8 T cell pool and/or the existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory pool within the lungs. Studies examining the IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory response have revealed that the epitope dominance is highly dynamic and changes over time (51). Therefore, in order to not bias our analysis and to encompass the entire IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory response, we used surrogate markers of activation to quantify the antigen-experienced CD8 (AgExp CD8) T cell memory pool (Figure 3A) (47). As expected, AgExp CD8 T cells were significantly higher in X31-immune→H2O mice compared to naïve controls, indicating that prior X31 infection induced a pulmonary IAV-specific CD8 T cell response (Figure 3C). Interestingly, AgExp CD8 T cells were significantly reduced in X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice, suggesting a numerical loss of the IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory response due to EtOH exposure (Figure 3C). Furthermore, when examining the localization of these T cells within the lungs, our results demonstrate that although the frequency of lung-resident AgExp CD8 T cells was similar between X31-immune→H2O and X31-immune→EtOH mice (Figure 3D), there was a significant reduction in lung-resident AgExp numbers in X31-immune→EtOH mice (Figure 3E). There was also a significant reduction in AgExp CD8 T cells in Naïve→EtOH mice compared to Naïve→H2O mice indicating that loss of AgExp CD8 T cells from the lungs after EtOH was not unique to the IAV-specific CD8 T cell response (Figure 3C). However, the reduced frequency of lung-resident AgExp CD8 T cells in naïve mice compared to X31-immune→H2O and X31-immune→EtOH mice suggests that IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory responses were negatively impacted by chronic EtOH exposure (Figure 3D). The loss of IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory responses was confirmed by quantifying NP366-specific CD8 T cells in X31-immune→EtOH mice, which were reduced in numbers compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Supplemental Figure 1A). Further, when the IAV-specific CD8 T cell response was monitored using adoptively transferred donor P14 CD8 T cells (Supplemental Figure 1B), we observed a significant reduction in IAV-specific CD8 T cells in X31gp33-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31gp33-immune→ H2O mice (Supplemental Figure 1C). Altogether these data verify that chronic EtOH consumption causes a numerical loss in the existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory pool within the lungs.

Chronic ethanol consumption causes a numerical reduction in CD8 T cell memory subsets

The memory CD8 T cell pool consists of a diverse population of cells that is established following a primary infection. CD8 T cell memory has traditionally been categorized into T central memory (TCM) and T effector memory (TEM). However, recent studies have expanded this dogma with the identification of T peripheral memory (TPM) and tissue-resident memory (TRM) subsets (23, 30-34, 36, 37, 52). The representation of each of these subsets within the CD8 T cell memory pool changes over time following a primary infection. For the populations within the circulation, TEM predominate early in the CD8 T cell memory response, but the CD8 T cell pool eventually shifts to being dominated by TCM and TPM (30). Similarly, while TRM can be found within the lung tissue early during the CD8 T cell memory response(52), their numbers wane over time (53). In order to better understand the EtOH-induced loss of CD8 T cell memory, we next determined the effects of chronic EtOH consumption on the composition of the CD8 T cell memory pool by examining the representation of TRM (CD69posCD103pos), TCM (CD103negCD27hiCX3CR1lo), TEM (CD103negCD27loCX3CR1hi), and TPM (CD103negCD27hiCX3CR1int) within the AgExp CD8 T cell pool in the lungs prior to subsequent IAV exposure (Figure 4A). Since prior studies have shown that TEM are largely excluded from the tissue and are primarily within the circulation (30), we began by analyzing the entire lung (i.e. circulation and tissue). As expected, X31-immune→H2O mice had significantly increased numbers of AgExp TCM, TEM, TRM, and TPM memory subsets in the lung compared to both naïve controls (Figure 4B). Interestingly, the numerical loss of AgExp CD8 T cells in X31-immune→EtOH mice was widespread, as there were reductions among all CD8 T cell memory subsets examined compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 4B). When we analyzed each memory subset for their tissue-residence based on i.v. antibody labeling, we observed that TCM, TRM, and TPM, but not TEM, of X31-immune→H2O and X31-immune→EtOH mice had an increased frequency of lung-resident cells (i.v. Abneg) compared to naïve controls (Figure 4C). This observation agrees with previous studies that determined that TEM are devoid from most tissues and instead are within the circulation (30). Interestingly, we observed decreased frequencies of lung-resident TPM in X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice, but frequencies of lung-resident TRM were similar (Figure 4C). The current understanding is that while TPM survey peripheral sites by migrating in and out of peripheral tissues from the circulation (30), TRM remain embedded within tissue and do not egress into the circulation (31, 33, 36). Therefore, the decreased frequencies of lung-resident TPM may indicate that the ability of circulating memory to gain access into the lung tissue is altered, which would be consistent with the altered chemokine environment observed in chronic EtOH animal models (11, 12, 45, 54). Nevertheless, even though the frequency of lung-resident TRM were similar between X31-immune→H2O and X31-immune→EtOH mice, there was a significant reduction in the number of lung-resident TRM, as well as TCM and TPM, in X31-immune→EtOH mice (Figure 4D). Overall, these data suggest that chronic EtOH consumption detrimentally impacts multiple IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory subsets within the lungs.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Numerical loss of existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory due to chronic ethanol consumption occurs across multiple T cell memory subsets in the lungs. Mice were infected then exposed to EtOH or water as in Figure 1. At 16 weeks post X31 infection, lungs were isolated and analyzed. (A) Representative gating strategies to (B) enumerate AgExp CD8 TRM(CD11ahiCD8αloCD69posCD103pos), TCM(CD11ahiCD8αloCD103negCX3CR1loCD27hi), TEM(CD11ahiCD8αloCD103negCX3CR1hiCD27lo), and TPM(CD11ahiCD8αloCD103negCX3CR1intCD27hi) within the lungs. (C) Frequency of lung-resident (CD45i.v. Abneg) memory was determined by i.v. antibody labeling. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Data are representative of two combined experiments with n= 10-15 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 (One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

Previous studies have determined that the lung dLNs are an important site not only for the maintenance of the IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory response following the resolution of primary IAV infection (55), but also for their reactivation and expansion upon secondary IAV challenge (51). Therefore, existing AgExp CD8 T cell memory responses within the lung dLNs were quantified (Figure 5). Similar to the trends observed in the lungs, total CD8 T cells and AgExp CD8 T cells in the lung dLNs of X31-immune→EtOH mice were significantly reduced compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figures 5A & 5B). There were also reductions in the number of total IAV-specific CD8 T cells when responses were examined by an individual epitope specificity in the lung dLNs of X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Supplemental Figure 1A & 1C). When we analyzed the individual subsets that make up the complete AgExp CD8 T cell memory response, we observed reductions in TPM in X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice, but TCM responses appeared unaltered (Figures 5C & 5F). TEM and nonlymphoid organ (NLO) TRM responses were not detected in large numbers within the lung dLNs, as these subsets are generally not found in secondary lymphoid organs (27, 30) (Figures 5D & 5E). A recent study has reported on a secondary lymphoid organ (SLO) resident CD8 T cell subset (56); however, we observed no difference in the number of SLO resident CD8 T cells in X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 5G). Altogether these results suggest existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory responses in the lungs and lung dLNs are negatively impacted by chronic EtOH consumption.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Numerical loss of existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory due to chronic ethanol consumption occurs across multiple T cell memory subsets in the lung dLNs. Mice were infected then exposed to EtOH or water as in Figure 1. At 16 weeks post X31 infection, lung dLNs were isolated and analyzed. (A) Total CD8 T cells, (B) AgExp CD8 T cells (CD11ahiCD8αlo), (C) TCM(CD11ahiCD8αloCD103negCX3CR1loCD27hi), (D) TEM(CD11ahiCD8αloCD103negCX3CR1hiCD27lo), (E) NLO TRM(CD11ahiCD8αloCD69posCD103pos), (F) TPM(CD11ahiCD8αloCD103negCX3CR1intCD27hi), and (G) SLO TRM (CD11ahiCD8αloCD69posCD62Lneg) were enumerated within the lung dLNs. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Data are representative of two combined experiments with n= 8-10 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 (One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

IAV-specific CD8 T cell recall responses are altered in chronic ethanol consuming mice

Following subsequent exposures of IAV, a critical component of protection is the early proliferation and accumulation of IAV-specific memory CD8 T cells within the lungs and lung dLNs (51). Interestingly, in mouse models of chronic EtOH consumption, the developing IAV-specific CD8 T cell effector response has a blunted proliferative capacity that ultimately contributes to increased disease severity (14). Considering we observed increases in disease severity in X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 1), we next determined if EtOH consumption altered the expansion of existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory in X31-immune→EtOH mice following IAV re-exposure. To this end, X31-immune→H2O and X31-immune→EtOH mice were challenged with a 0.1LD50 dose of PR8 and AgExp CD8 T cells were quantified in the entire lung, the lung parenchyma (CD45 i.v.Abneg), and the lung vasculature (CD45 i.v.Abpos) at day 3 p.i., i.e. a time point preceding the arrival of de novo effector T cells in the lungs (Figure 6) (57-59). Within the total lungs (i.e. interstitium + vasculature) of X31-immune→EtOH mice, the total AgExp CD8 T cell response was significantly lower in number three days after PR8 challenge compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 6A); however, the fold expansion (i.e. accumulation) of total AgExp CD8 T cells was similar in X31-immune→EtOH mice and X31-immune→H2O mice based on the fold-increase versus the numbers present in pre-challenged mice (7.6x vs. 7.7x, Figure 6A). This translated into little to no defects in the fold-increase of TCM, TEM, TRM, and TPM within the lungs of X31-immune→EtOH mice following PR8 challenge (Figures 6B6E). Interestingly, when we examined the AgExp CD8 T cell responses within the lung vasculature (i.e. CD45 i.v.Abpos) of X31-immune→EtOH mice, the fold-increase of total AgExp CD8s, as well as in TCM, TEM, and TPM, were higher compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figures 6F, 6G, 6H, & 6J). However, little to no difference was detected in the fold-increase of lung-resident TRM in X31-immune→EtOH mice (Figure 6I). Conversely, when we assessed cells within the lung tissue (i.e. CD45 i.v.Abneg) we observed substantial reductions in the fold-increases of total AgExp CD8s, TCM, TEM, and TPM of X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figures 6K, 6L, 6M, and 6O) and little to no change in TRM (Figure 6N). This reduced fold-increase of TCM, TEM, and TPM within the lung tissue, when coupled to the increases observed within the lung vasculature of X31-immune→EtOH mice, suggests that EtOH consumption causes defects in migration of these T cell subsets into the tissue from the vasculature and/or their proliferation once in the lung interstitium (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Recall response of existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory are altered in the lungs of EtOH consuming mice. Mice were infected then exposed to EtOH or water as in Figure 1. At 16 weeks post X31 infection, mice were challenged with heterologous PR8 (H1N1) and lungs were isolated and analyzed at three days post PR8 challenge. (A, F, K) AgExp CD8 T cells, (B, G, L) TCM, (C, H, M) TEM, (D, I, N) TRM, and (E, J, O) TPM were enumerated within the (A-E) total lung, (F-J) within the lung vasculature (i.e. CD45 i.v. Abpos), or (K-O) within the lung tissue (i.e. CD45 i.v. Abneg). Data were compared to pre-challenge numbers from Figure 5 (Day 0) to calculate fold-increase. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Data are representative of two combined experiments with n= 4-5 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, NS= not significant (student’s t test).

Previous studies show that effector IAV-specific CD8 T cells in chronic EtOH mice have a reduced proliferative capacity (14). Interestingly, based on Ki67 staining, we observed a significant reduction in the frequency of proliferating AgExp CD8 T cells within the lung tissue of X31-immune→EtOH mice prior to secondary challenge. However, no differences in the proliferation of AgExp memory CD8 T cells was observed within the lungs of X31-immune→EtOH mice and X31-immune→H2O mice at 3 days post challenge (Supplemental Figure 2). Furthermore, the fold-increase in total AgExp CD8 T cells within the lung dLNs in X31-immune→EtOH mice was similar to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 7A). TCM and TPM appear to equally contribute to this expansion, as we observed similar fold-increases in both subsets in X31-immune→EtOH mice and X31-immune→H2O mice (Figures 7B & 7C). Overall these data strongly suggest that proliferation of memory CD8 T cells is not affected by EtOH consumption following secondary IAV challenge, but that the defect in TCM, TPM, and TEM lies in their reduced initial numbers as well as their ability to migrate out of the blood and into the inflamed lung tissue in X31-immune→EtOH mice.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Recall response of IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory cells in the lung dLNs of EtOH consuming mice. Mice were infected then exposed to EtOH or water as in Figure 1. At 16 weeks post X31 infection, mice were challenged with PR8 (H1N1) and lung dLNs were isolated and analyzed at three days post PR8 challenge. (A) AgExp CD8 T cells, (B) AgExp TCM and (C) AgExp TPM were enumerated within the lung dLNs. Data were compared to pre-challenge numbers from Figure 6 (Day 0) to calculate fold-increase. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Data are representative of two combined experiments with n= 4-5 mice/group.

Chronic EtOH consumption significantly alters the chemokine milieu during secondary IAV infection

It is well established that chemokine and chemokine receptors have an essential role in controlling the migration patterns of immune cells, including T cells during the steady-state and during inflammation/infection(60-66). Studies show that following secondary respiratory virus exposure, CCR5 and CXCR3 play crucial roles in the trafficking of T cell memory to the lungs and lung airways (60, 62-66). Furthermore, it is known that the chemokine environment is significantly altered following chronic EtOH exposure in non-human primates (11, 12, 54) and that the ligands for CCR5 (CCL5) and CXCR3 (CXCL10, CXCL11) are significantly altered in the lungs of human alcoholics (67). Thus, we determined the expression of CCR5 and CXCR3 on AgExp CD8 T cells in the lungs of X31-immune→H2O and X31-immune→EtOH mice following a secondary IAV challenge. Unexpectedly, we observed little to no differences in the expression of CXCR3 or CCR5 on AgExp CD8 T cells from X31-immune→EtOH and X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 8A & 8C). We next determined the expression of the chemokine ligands for CXCR3 (CXCL10 and CXCL11) and CCR5 (CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5) within the lungs and serum of X31-immune→EtOH and X31-immune→H2O mice following secondary IAV challenge. Although there were no differences in chemokine levels prior to secondary challenge (Figure 8B & 8D), we observed significant reductions in CXCL10 and CXCL11 within the lungs of X31-immune→EtOH mice at day 3 post challenge (Figure 8B). Conversely, we observed no difference in the level of CCR5 ligands within the lungs of X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 8D). Interestingly, we observed similar levels of CXCL10, CXCL11, CCL4, and CCL5 within the serum of X31-immune→EtOH and X31-immune→H2O mice (Figure 8B & 8D). Although we did observe a significant reduction in CCL3 within the serum of X31-immune→EtOH mice (Figure 8D), the difference was marginal (i.e. only ~4pg/mL difference). These data indicate that chronic EtOH consumption causes reductions in CXCL10 and CXCL11 within the lungs following IAV re-exposure, which likely impacts the migration of AgExp CD8 T cell memory into the lungs from the vasculature due to reduced signaling through CXCR3.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Chronic EtOH consumption causes alterations in the chemokine milieu within the lungs of IAV-immune mice following secondary IAV challenge. Mice were infected then exposed to EtOH or water as in Figure 1. At 16 weeks post X31 infection, mice were left unchallenged or challenged with heterologous PR8 (H1N1) and lungs were isolated and analyzed at three days post PR8 challenge. Chemokine receptor expression of (A) CXCR3 and (C) CCR5 was determined for CD45 i.v. Abpos and CD45 i.v. Abneg AgExp CD8 T cells within the lungs. Serum and lung levels of (B) CXCR3 ligands (CXCL10 and CXCL11) and (D) CCR5 ligands (CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5) were measured by Bio-Plex. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Data are from one independent experiment with n= 3-4 mice/group. *P < 0.05, NS=not significant (student’s t test).

Discussion

Chronic abuse of alcohol has significant impacts on the innate and adaptive branches of the immune system. Not only does chronic alcohol consumption result in an overall numerical reduction in several immune cell subsets, it has also been reported to alter immune cell function. During a primary IAV infection, IAV-specific effector CD8 T cell numbers are reduced in EtOH consuming mice. Further, these cells have a reduced proliferative capacity and decreased cytotoxic ability (10, 14). This dysfunctional IAV-specific effector CD8 T cell response likely contributes to the increased burden of disease and mortality observed during primary IAV infection in chronic EtOH consuming mice and humans (1-7, 10, 13, 68). Yet, unlike immunologically naïve mouse models, humans likely have pre-existing IAV-specific memory responses prior to their chronic alcohol consumption. The data presented herein demonstrate that mice with established IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory within the lungs that then chronically consumed EtOH (i.e. X31-immune→EtOH) exhibited increased morbidity and mortality following a subsequent IAV challenge (Figure 1). The increase in IAV-disease severity in X31-immune→EtOH mice was associated with reduced T cell cytotoxic activity within the lungs, as X31-immune→EtOH mice had a reduced capacity to lyse IAV-specific target cells within the lungs compared to X31-immune→H2O (Figure 2). This finding during memory is consistent with our previous studies examining the IAV-specific CD8 T cell response during a primary IAV infection, which determined that effector IAV-specific CD8 T cells from chronic EtOH mice had a reduced cytotoxic activity (14).

A consistent finding in our results is that the reduction in the number of existing IAV-specific CD8 T cells was observed across all T cell memory subsets within both the lungs (Figures 3, 4, and Supplemental Figure 1) and the lung dLNs (Figure 5 and Supplemental Figure 1) of X31-immune→EtOH mice compared to X31-immune→H2O mice. Interestingly, based on Ki67 staining, we did observe a reduction in the proliferation of IAV-specific CD8 T cells within the lungs of IAV-immune EtOH mice prior to PR8 challenge, which likely contributes to the reduced numbers we observed (Supplemental Figure 2). Previous studies have determined that the CD8 T cell memory compartment is maintained by both antigen-dependent and antigen-independent mechanisms (23, 51, 55, 62, 69-77). In particular, maintenance of the existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory compartment relies on both IL-15 (73) and antigen-bearing rDCs continually migrating out of the lungs and into the lung dLNs (55, 78). Interestingly, the number of IL-15 producing cells within the spleen is significantly reduced in chronic EtOH mice (79). Furthermore, recent studies from our laboratory have determined that the migration of CD11cpos DCs out of the lung and into the lung dLNs is reduced in EtOH consuming mice following IAV infection (80). Therefore, the reduction in the numbers of existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory in X31-immune→EtOH we observed could be dictated by either reduced expression of homeostatic cytokines, such as IL-7 and/or IL-15, or reduced access to antigen.

Our data further reveal that the negative impacts of chronic EtOH consumption not only affect resting CD8 T cell memory subsets, but also alter the recall response following subsequent IAV challenge. While the numbers of IAV-specific CD8 T cells in the lung interstitium of IAV-immune consuming mice were reduced at day three post challenge compared to IAV-immune water consuming mice, the fold-increase in the total lung (interstitium + vasculature; Figure 6) was similar between these two groups. Unlike what was observed for naïve/effector CD8 T cells during a primary infection (14), this and our analysis of Ki67 (Supplemental Figure 2) suggests that proliferation of IAV-specific memory CD8 T cells in IAV-immune EtOH consuming mice is unaffected following secondary IAV challenge. However, we did observe a reduction in the fold-increase of IAV-specific CD8 T cell subsets resident in the lung interstitium (Figure 6K6O) and a higher fold-increase of IAV-specific CD8 T cells within the lung vasculature (Figure 6F6J) of IAV-immune EtOH consuming mice compared to IAV-immune water controls. Altogether, these data suggest that trafficking of IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory from the blood into the lungs is reduced by chronic EtOH consumption.

Consistent with this concept of reduced migration, our results further demonstrate that the chemokine milieu within the lungs is significantly altered in IAV-immune mice following EtOH exposure and virus challenge. Although CCR5 and CXCR3 expression on IAV-specific memory CD8 T cells was not affected, we observed significant reductions in the levels of CXCL10 and CXCL11 within the lungs of IAV-immune EtOH consuming mice on day three following secondary IAV challenge (Figure 8). Interestingly, in addition to airway epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages, CD8 T cells have been observed to secrete CXCL10 upon TCR engagement and contribute to the CXCL10 pool within the lungs during IAV infection (81, 82). Furthermore, it is well known that CD8 TRM possess a “sensing and alarm function” that rapidly induces local chemokine expression, including CXCL10, by cells of the innate immune system (34, 83). Therefore, the reduced numbers of total and IAV-specific CD8 T cells within the lungs of X31-immune→EtOH mice (Figure 3-6) likely contributes to the reduced levels of CXCL10 that we observed following secondary IAV exposure (Figure 8). Although the specific role of CXCL10, and its receptor CXCR3, in the trafficking of CD8 T cell memory within the lungs following a secondary infection is not well defined, CXCR3 expression is important for the effective localization of CD8 T cell memory to the lung airways (63, 65). Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated CXCR3-deficient CD8 T cells have a reduced capacity to enter into areas of infection and have reduced interactions with virally infected cells within the skin (61). Thus, the reduced expression of CXCL10 and CXCL11 within the lungs of IAV-immune EtOH consuming mice may deter the egress of IAV-specific CD8 T cells out of the blood and into the infected lung tissue, ultimately contributing to reduced virus control and increased disease severity.

Altogether the data presented herein describe for the first time the negative impacts that EtOH consumption has on existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory responses. The consumption of EtOH led to an overall numerical reduction within the four known CD8 T cell memory subsets (i.e. TCM, TEM, TPM, and TRM) and was associated with increased disease severity upon secondary IAV challenge. Furthermore, the recall response following secondary IAV challenge was altered in X31-immune→EtOH mice, which had a reduced fold-increase in IAV-specific CD8 T cells within the lung tissue that was associated with a significantly altered chemokine milieu within the lungs. These results support continued investigation into the effects of EtOH consumption on existing IAV-specific CD8 T cell memory pool and the impact it has on the protection against severe IAV-associated disease.

Supplementary Material

1

Key Points:

  1. Chronic EtOH consumption alters the existing memory T cell compartment.

  2. EtOH induced changes in existing memory T cells increase susceptibility to IAV.

  3. Chronic EtOH alters memory T cell mediated killing and recruitment into the lungs.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant AA024860 to K.L.L. Z.R.Z was supported by NIH T32AI007485 and T32AI007260.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

i.n.

intranasal

EtOH

ethanol

dLNs

draining lymph nodes

TCM

central memory

TEM

effector memory

TRM

T resident memory

TPM

T peripheral memory

IAV

influenza A virus

AgExp

antigen experienced

References

  • 1.Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pasala S, Barr T, and Messaoudi I. 2015. Impact of Alcohol Abuse on the Adaptive Immune System. Alcohol Res. 37: 185–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang P, Bagby GJ, Happel KI, Summer WR, and Nelson S. 2002. Pulmonary host defenses and alcohol. Front. Biosci 7: 1314–1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Happel KI, and Nelson S. 2005. Alcohol, immunosuppression, and the lung. Proc. Am. Thora.c Soc 2: 428–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nelson S, and Kolls JK. 2002. Alcohol, host defence and society. Nat. Rev. Immunol 2: 205–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cook RT 1998. Alcohol abuse, alcoholism, and damage to the immune system--a review. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 22: 1927–1942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cook RT, Waldschmidt TJ, Cook BL, Labrecque DR, and McLatchie K. 1996. Loss of the CD5+ and CD45RAhi B cell subsets in alcoholics. Clin. Exp. Immunol 103: 304–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tonnesen H, Andersen JR, Pedersen AE, and Kaiser AH. 1990. Lymphopenia in heavy drinkers--reversibility and relation to the duration of drinking episodes. Ann. Med 22: 229–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McGill J, Meyerholz DK, Edsen-Moore M, Young B, Coleman RA, Schlueter AJ, Waldschmidt TJ, Cook RT, and Legge KL. 2009. Fetal exposure to ethanol has long-term effects on the severity of influenza virus infections. J. Immunol 182: 7803–7808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meyerholz DK, Edsen-Moore M, McGill J, Coleman RA, Cook RT, and Legge KL. 2008. Chronic alcohol consumption increases the severity of murine influenza virus infections. J. Immunol 181: 641–648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Asquith M, Pasala S, Engelmann F, Haberthur K, Meyer C, Park B, Grant KA, and Messaoudi I. 2014. Chronic ethanol consumption modulates growth factor release, mucosal cytokine production, and microRNA expression in nonhuman primates. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 38: 980–993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sureshchandra S, Rais M, Stull C, Grant K, and Messaoudi I. 2016. Transcriptome Profiling Reveals Disruption of Innate Immunity in Chronic Heavy Ethanol Consuming Female Rhesus Macaques. PLoS One 11: e0159295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gurung P, Young BM, Coleman RA, Wiechert S, Turner LE, Ray NB, Waldschmidt TJ, Legge KL, and Cook RT. 2009. Chronic ethanol induces inhibition of antigen-specific CD8+ but not CD4+ immunodominant T cell responses following Listeria monocytogenes inoculation. J. Leucko. Bio 85: 34–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hemann EA, McGill JL, and Legge KL. 2014. Chronic ethanol exposure selectively inhibits the influenza-specific CD8 T cell response during influenza a virus infection. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 38: 2403–2413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Greenbaum A, Chaves SS, Perez A, Aragon D, Bandyopadhyay A, Bennett N, Fowler B, Hancock E, Lynfield R, McDonald-Hamm C, Reingold A, Ryan P, Schaffner W, Sharangpani R, Spencer M, Thomas A, Yousey-Hindes K, Zansky S, and Finelli L. 2014. Heavy alcohol use as a risk factor for severe outcomes among adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza, 2005-2012. Infection. 42: 165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Richards KA, Topham D, Chaves FA, and Sant AJ. 2010. Cutting edge: CD4 T cells generated from encounter with seasonal influenza viruses and vaccines have broad protein specificity and can directly recognize naturally generated epitopes derived from the live pandemic H1N1 virus. J. Immunol 185: 4998–5002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miller MS, Gardner TJ, Krammer F, Aguado LC, Tortorella D, Basler CF, and Palese P. 2013. Neutralizing antibodies against previously encountered influenza virus strains increase over time: a longitudinal analysis. Sci. Transl. Med 5: 198ra107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Buricchi F, Bardelli M, Malzone C, Capecchi B, Nicolay U, Fragapane E, Castellino F, Del Giudice G, Galli G, and Finco O. 2013. Impact of preexisting memory to seasonal A/H1N1 influenza virus on the immune response following vaccination against avian A/H5N1 virus. Eur. J. Immunol 43: 641–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jameson J, Cruz J, Terajima M, and Ennis FA. 1999. Human CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocyte memory to influenza A viruses of swine and avian species. J. Immunol 162: 7578–7583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Koutsakos M, Illing PT, Nguyen THO, Mifsud NA, Crawford JC, Rizzetto S, Eltahla AA, Clemens EB, Sant S, Chua BY, Wong CY, Allen EK, Teng D, Dash P, Boyd DF, Grzelak L, Zeng W, Hurt AC, Barr I, Rockman S, Jackson DC, Kotsimbos TC, Cheng AC, Richards M, Westall GP, Loudovaris T, Mannering SI, Elliott M, Tangye SG, Wakim LM, Rossjohn J, Vijaykrishna D, Luciani F, Thomas PG, Gras S, Purcell AW, and Kedzierska K. 2019. Human CD8(+) T cell cross-reactivity across influenza A, B and C viruses. Nat. Immunol 20: 613–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pizzolla A, Nguyen TH, Sant S, Jaffar J, Loudovaris T, Mannering SI, Thomas PG, Westall GP, Kedzierska K, and Wakim LM. 2018. Influenza-specific lung-resident memory T cells are proliferative and polyfunctional and maintain diverse TCR profiles. J. Clin. Invest 128: 721–733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Snyder ME, Finlayson MO, Connors TJ, Dogra P, Senda T, Bush E, Carpenter D, Marboe C, Benvenuto L, Shah L, Robbins H, Hook JL, Sykes M, D’Ovidio F, Bacchetta M, Sonett JR, Lederer DJ, Arcasoy S, Sims PA, and Farber DL. 2019. Generation and persistence of human tissue-resident memory T cells in lung transplantation. Sci. Immunol 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Turner DL, Bickham KL, Thome JJ, Kim CY, D’Ovidio F, Wherry EJ, and Farber DL. 2014. Lung niches for the generation and maintenance of tissue-resident memory T cells. Mucosal Immunol. 7: 501–510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sridhar S 2016. Heterosubtypic T-Cell Immunity to Influenza in Humans: Challenges for Universal T-Cell Influenza Vaccines. Front. Immunol 7: 195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sridhar S, Begom S, Bermingham A, Hoschler K, Adamson W, Carman W, Bean T, Barclay W, Deeks JJ, and Lalvani A. 2013. Cellular immune correlates of protection against symptomatic pandemic influenza. Nat. Med 19: 1305–1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hayward AC, Wang L, Goonetilleke N, Fragaszy EB, Bermingham A, Copas A, Dukes O, Millett ER, Nazareth I, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Watson JM, Zambon M, Flu Watch G, Johnson AM, and McMichael AJ. 2015. Natural T Cell-mediated Protection against Seasonal and Pandemic Influenza. Results of the Flu Watch Cohort Study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med 191: 1422–1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nolz JC 2015. Molecular mechanisms of CD8(+) T cell trafficking and localization. Cell. Mol. Life Sci 72: 2461–2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sallusto F, Geginat J, and Lanzavecchia A. 2004. Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. Annu. Rev. Immunol 22: 745–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, and Lanzavecchia A. 1999. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature. 401: 708–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gerlach C, Moseman EA, Loughhead SM, Alvarez D, Zwijnenburg AJ, Waanders L, Garg R, de la Torre JC, and von Andrian UH. 2016. The Chemokine Receptor CX3CR1 Defines Three Antigen-Experienced CD8 T Cell Subsets with Distinct Roles in Immune Surveillance and Homeostasis. Immunity. 45: 1270–1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gebhardt T, Wakim LM, Eidsmo L, Reading PC, Heath WR, and Carbone FR. 2009. Memory T cells in nonlymphoid tissue that provide enhanced local immunity during infection with herpes simplex virus. Nat. Immunol 10: 524–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Turner DL, and Farber DL. 2014. Mucosal resident memory CD4 T cells in protection and immunopathology. Front. Immunol 5: 331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Casey KA, Fraser KA, Schenkel JM, Moran A, Abt MC, Beura LK, Lucas PJ, Artis D, Wherry EJ, Hogquist K, Vezys V, and Masopust D. 2012. Antigen-independent differentiation and maintenance of effector-like resident memory T cells in tissues. J. Immunol 188: 4866–4875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schenkel JM, Fraser KA, Beura LK, Pauken KE, Vezys V, and Masopust D. 2014. T cell memory. Resident memory CD8 T cells trigger protective innate and adaptive immune responses. Science. 346: 98–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Anderson KG, Mayer-Barber K, Sung H, Beura L, James BR, Taylor JJ, Qunaj L, Griffith TS, Vezys V, Barber DL, and Masopust D. 2014. Intravascular staining for discrimination of vascular and tissue leukocytes. Nat. Prot 9: 209–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mackay LK, Rahimpour A, Ma JZ, Collins N, Stock AT, Hafon ML, Vega-Ramos J, Lauzurica P, Mueller SN, Stefanovic T, Tscharke DC, Heath WR, Inouye M, Carbone FR, and Gebhardt T. 2013. The developmental pathway for CD103(+)CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells of skin. Nat. Immunol 14: 1294–1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Skon CN, Lee JY, Anderson KG, Masopust D, Hogquist KA, and Jameson SC. 2013. Transcriptional downregulation of S1pr1 is required for the establishment of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nat. Immunol 14: 1285–1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kumar BV, Ma W, Miron M, Granot T, Guyer RS, Carpenter DJ, Senda T, Sun X, Ho SH, Lerner H, Friedman AL, Shen Y, and Farber DL. 2017. Human Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells Are Defined by Core Transcriptional and Functional Signatures in Lymphoid and Mucosal Sites. Cell Rep. 20: 2921–2934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sathaliyawala T, Kubota M, Yudanin N, Turner D, Camp P, Thome JJ, Bickham KL, Lerner H, Goldstein M, Sykes M, Kato T, and Farber DL. 2013. Distribution and compartmentalization of human circulating and tissue-resident memory T cell subsets. Immunity. 38: 187–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zens KD, Chen JK, and Farber DL. 2016. Vaccine-generated lung tissue-resident memory T cells provide heterosubtypic protection to influenza infection. JCI Insight. 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wu T, Hu Y, Lee YT, Bouchard KR, Benechet A, Khanna K, and Cauley LS. 2014. Lung-resident memory CD8 T cells (TRM) are indispensable for optimal cross-protection against pulmonary virus infection. J. Leucko. Bio 95: 215–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Legge KL, and Braciale TJ. 2003. Accelerated migration of respiratory dendritic cells to the regional lymph nodes is limited to the early phase of pulmonary infection. Immunity. 18: 265–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cook RT, Schlueter AJ, Coleman RA, Tygrett L, Ballas ZK, Jerrells TR, Nashelsky MB, Ray NB, Haugen TH, and Waldschmidt TJ. 2007. Thymocytes, pre-B cells, and organ changes in a mouse model of chronic ethanol ingestion--absence of subset-specific glucocorticoid-induced immune cell loss. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 31: 1746–1758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cook RT, Zhu X, Coleman RA, Ballas ZK, Waldschmidt TJ, Ray NB, LaBrecque DR, and Cook BL. 2004. T-cell activation after chronic ethanol ingestion in mice. Alcohol. 33: 175–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Parlet CP, and Schlueter AJ. 2013. Mechanisms by which chronic ethanol feeding impairs the migratory capacity of cutaneous dendritic cells. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 37: 2098–2107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Brincks EL, Katewa A, Kucaba TA, Griffith TS, and Legge KL. 2008. CD8 T cells utilize TRAIL to control influenza virus infection. J. Immunol 181: 4918–4925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rai D, Pham NL, Harty JT, and Badovinac VP. 2009. Tracking the total CD8 T cell response to infection reveals substantial discordance in magnitude and kinetics between inbred and outbred hosts. J. Immunol 183: 7672–7681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zacharias ZR, Ross KA, Hornick EE, Goodman JT, Narasimhan B, Waldschmidt TJ, and Legge KL. 2018. Polyanhydride Nanovaccine Induces Robust Pulmonary B and T Cell Immunity and Confers Protection Against Homologous and Heterologous Influenza A Virus Infections. Front. Immunol. 9: 1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Quigley LA, and Marlatt GA. 1996. Drinking among young adults: prevalence, patterns, and consequences. . Alcohol Health & Research World. 20: 185–191. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.McMichael AJ, Gotch FM, Noble GR, and Beare PA. 1983. Cytotoxic T-cell immunity to influenza. New Engl. J. Med 309: 13–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Suarez-Ramirez JE, Wu T, Lee YT, Aguila CC, Bouchard KR, and Cauley LS. 2011. Division of labor between subsets of lymph node dendritic cells determines the specificity of the CD8(+) T-cell recall response to influenza infection. Eur. J. Immunol 41: 2632–2641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.McMaster SR, Wein AN, Dunbar PR, Hayward SL, Cartwright EK, Denning TL, and Kohlmeier JE. 2018. Pulmonary antigen encounter regulates the establishment of tissue-resident CD8 memory T cells in the lung airways and parenchyma. Mucosal Immunol. 11: 1071–1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Slutter B, Van Braeckel-Budimir N, Abboud G, Varga SM, Salek-Ardakani S, and Harty JT. 2017. Dynamics of influenza-induced lung-resident memory T cells underlie waning heterosubtypic immunity. Sci. Immunol doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aag2031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Helms CM, Messaoudi I, Jeng S, Freeman WM, Vrana KE, and Grant KA. 2012. A longitudinal analysis of circulating stress-related proteins and chronic ethanol self-administration in cynomolgus macaques. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 36: 995–1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kim TS, Hufford MM, Sun J, Fu YX, and Braciale TJ. 2010. Antigen persistence and the control of local T cell memory by migrant respiratory dendritic cells after acute virus infection. J. Exp. Med 207: 1161–1172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Beura LK, Wijeyesinghe S, Thompson EA, Macchietto MG, Rosato PC, Pierson MJ, Schenkel JM, Mitchell JS, Vezys V, Fife BT, Shen S, and Masopust D. 2018. T Cells in Nonlymphoid Tissues Give Rise to Lymph-Node-Resident Memory T Cells. Immunity. 48: 327–338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.McGill J, and Legge KL. 2009. Cutting edge: contribution of lung-resident T cell proliferation to the overall magnitude of the antigen-specific CD8 T cell response in the lungs following murine influenza virus infection. J. Immunol. 183: 4177–4181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lawrence CW, and Braciale TJ. 2004. Activation, differentiation, and migration of naive virus-specific CD8+ T cells during pulmonary influenza virus infection. J. Immunol 173: 1209–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lawrence CW, Ream RM, and Braciale TJ. 2005. Frequency, specificity, and sites of expansion of CD8+ T cells during primary pulmonary influenza virus infection. J. Immunol 174: 5332–5340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kohlmeier JE, Miller SC, Smith J, Lu B, Gerard C, Cookenham T, Roberts AD, and Woodland DL. 2008. The chemokine receptor CCR5 plays a key role in the early memory CD8+ T cell response to respiratory virus infections. Immunity. 29: 101–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hickman HD, Reynoso GV, Ngudiankama BF, Cush SS, Gibbs J, Bennink JR, and Yewdell JW. 2015. CXCR3 chemokine receptor enables local CD8(+) T cell migration for the destruction of virus-infected cells. Immunity. 42: 524–537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kohlmeier JE, Reiley WW, Perona-Wright G, Freeman ML, Yager EJ, Connor LM, Brincks EL, Cookenham T, Roberts AD, Burkum CE, Sell S, Winslow GM, Blackman MA, Mohrs M, and Woodland DL. 2011. Inflammatory chemokine receptors regulate CD8(+) T cell contraction and memory generation following infection. J. Exp. Med 208: 1621–1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Slutter B, Pewe LL, Kaech SM, and Harty JT. 2013. Lung airway-surveilling CXCR3(hi) memory CD8(+) T cells are critical for protection against influenza A virus. Immunity. 39: 939–948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kohlmeier JE, Cookenham T, Miller SC, Roberts AD, Christensen JP, Thomsen AR, and Woodland DL. 2009. CXCR3 directs antigen-specific effector CD4+ T cell migration to the lung during parainfluenza virus infection. J. Immunol 183: 4378–4384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gilchuk P, Hill TM, Guy C, McMaster SR, Boyd KL, Rabacal WA, Lu P, Shyr Y, Kohlmeier JE, Sebzda E, Green DR, and Joyce S. 2016. A Distinct Lung-Interstitium-Resident Memory CD8(+) T Cell Subset Confers Enhanced Protection to Lower Respiratory Tract Infection. Cell Rep. 16: 1800–1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Galkina E, Thatte J, Dabak V, Williams MB, Ley K, and Braciale TJ. 2005. Preferential migration of effector CD8+ T cells into the interstitium of the normal lung. J. Clin. Invest 115: 3473–3483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.O’Halloran EB, Curtis BJ, Afshar M, Chen MM, Kovacs EJ, and Burnham EL. 2016. Alveolar macrophage inflammatory mediator expression is elevated in the setting of alcohol use disorders. Alcohol. 50: 43–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cook RT, Ballas ZK, Waldschmidt TJ, Vandersteen D, LaBrecque DR, and Cook BL. 1995. Modulation of T-cell adhesion markers, and the CD45R and CD57 antigens in human alcoholics. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 19: 555–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Swain SL, Hu H, and Huston G. 1999. Class II-independent generation of CD4 memory T cells from effectors. Science. 286: 1381–1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Belz GT, Wodarz D, Diaz G, Nowak MA, and Doherty PC. 2002. Compromised influenza virus-specific CD8(+)-T-cell memory in CD4(+)-T-cell-deficient mice. J. Virol 76: 12388–12393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tanchot C, Lemonnier FA, Perarnau B, Freitas AA, and Rocha B. 1997. Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naive or memory T cells. Science. 276: 2057–2062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wakim LM, Gupta N, Mintern JD, and Villadangos JA. 2013. Enhanced survival of lung tissue-resident memory CD8(+) T cells during infection with influenza virus due to selective expression of IFITM3. Nat. Immunol 14: 238–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Surh CD, Boyman O, Purton JF, and Sprent J. 2006. Homeostasis of memory T cells. Immunol. Rev. 211: 154–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kassiotis G, Garcia S, Simpson E, and Stockinger B. 2002. Impairment of immunological memory in the absence of MHC despite survival of memory T cells. Nat. Immunol 3: 244–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Richer MJ, Pewe LL, Hancox LS, Hartwig SM, Varga SM, and Harty JT. 2015. Inflammatory IL-15 is required for optimal memory T cell responses. J. Clin. Invest 125: 3477–3490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Khan TN, Mooster JL, Kilgore AM, Osborn JF, and Nolz JC. 2016. Local antigen in nonlymphoid tissue promotes resident memory CD8+ T cell formation during viral infection. J. Exp. Med 213: 951–966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shen CH, Ge Q, Talay O, Eisen HN, Garcia-Sastre A, and Chen J. 2008. Loss of IL-7R and IL-15R expression is associated with disappearance of memory T cells in respiratory tract following influenza infection. J. Immunol 180: 171–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zammit DJ, Turner DL, Klonowski KD, Lefrancois L, and Cauley LS. 2006. Residual antigen presentation after influenza virus infection affects CD8 T cell activation and migration. Immunity. 24: 439–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zhang H, and Meadows GG. 2009. Exogenous IL-15 in combination with IL-15R alpha rescues natural killer cells from apoptosis induced by chronic alcohol consumption. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 33: 419–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Legge KL, and Waldschmidt TJ. 2014. Alcohol and the Adaptive Immune Response in the Airway: Dendritic Cell and Lymphocyte Impairments In Alcohol Use Disorders and the Lung: A Clinical and Pathophysiological Approach. Guidot DM, and Mehta AJ, eds. Springer New York, New York, NY: 115–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hamada H, Bassity E, Flies A, Strutt TM, Garcia-Hernandez Mde L, McKinstry KK, Zou T, Swain SL, and Dutton RW. 2013. Multiple redundant effector mechanisms of CD8+ T cells protect against influenza infection. J. Immunol 190: 296–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Peperzak V, Veraar EA, Xiao Y, Babala N, Thiadens K, Brugmans M, and Borst J. 2013. CD8+ T cells produce the chemokine CXCL10 in response to CD27/CD70 costimulation to promote generation of the CD8+ effector T cell pool. J. Immunol 191: 3025–3036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Schenkel JM, Fraser KA, Vezys V, and Masopust D 2013. Sensing and alarm function of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nat. Immunol 14: 509–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES