Skip to main content
Neural Regeneration Research logoLink to Neural Regeneration Research
. 2019 Sep 24;15(2):352–360. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.265558

Endothelin increases the proliferation of rat olfactory mucosa cells

Bertrand Bryche 1,2, Audrey Saint-Albin 1, Claire Le Poupon Schlegel 1, Christine Baly 1, Patrice Congar 1, Nicolas Meunier 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC6905347  PMID: 31552909

Abstract

The olfactory mucosa holds olfactory sensory neurons directly in contact with an aggressive environment. In order to maintain its integrity, it is one of the few neural zones which are continuously renewed during the whole animal life. Among several factors regulating this renewal, endothelin acts as an anti-apoptotic factor in the rat olfactory epithelium. In the present study, we explored whether endothelin could also act as a proliferative factor. Using primary culture of the olfactory mucosa, we found that an early treatment with endothelin increased its growth. Consistently, a treatment with a mixture of BQ123 and BQ788 (endothelin receptor antagonists) decreased the primary culture growth without affecting the cellular death level. We then used combined approaches of calcium imaging, reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and protein level measurements to show that endothelin was locally synthetized by the primary culture until it reached confluency. Furthermore, in vivo intranasal instillation of endothelin receptor antagonists led to a decrease of olfactory mucosa cell expressing proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a marker of proliferation. Only short-term treatment reduced the PCNA level in the olfactory mucosa cells. When the treatment was prolonged, the PCNA level was not statistically affected but the expression level of endothelin was increased. Overall, our results show that endothelin plays a proliferative role in the olfactory mucosa and that its level is dynamically regulated. This study was approved by the Comité d’éthique en expérimentation animale COMETHEA (COMETHEA C2EA -45; protocol approval #12-058) on November 28, 2012.

Keywords: autocrine factor, cell culture, cellular dynamics, endothelin, olfaction, olfactory basal cells, olfactory epithelium, olfactory mucosa primary culture


Chinese Library Classification No. R452; R364; R741

Introduction

The first step of odour detection takes place in the olfactory epithelium. This sensory neuroepithelium is mainly composed of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) surrounded by sustentacular cells. It lies on a lamina propria composed of Bowman’s glands, blood vessels, fibroblasts and OSNs axons wrapped in olfactory ensheathing cells. The lamina propria and the olfactory epithelium form the olfactory mucosa (OM). OSNs possess cilia-holding olfactory receptors capable of binding odorants. These cilia are bathed in mucus directly in contact with the environment. They are exposed to oxidative stress, noxious substances and pathogens that gradually damage the OSNs. While neuronal injury in the central nervous system cannot be repaired, the olfactory epithelium undergoes regular apoptosis and proliferation throughout life to maintain the sense of smell (Graziadei, 1973; Schwob, 2002; Brann and Firestein, 2014). This unique capacity has given rise to interest in this mechanism as a potential way to regenerate other injured neuronal tissue especially as it involves the targeting of newly formed OSN axons to the central nervous system (Yao et al., 2018). The renewal of the OM relies on the proliferation of two stem cells type: globose and horizontal basal cells which are engaged differently in the process according to the severity of the OM damages (Schwob et al., 2017). Numerous growth and survival factors are involved in this process and studies of their characterization are increasing in number. Many such factors have been described since the review by Mackay-Sim and Chuah (Mackay-Sima and Chuahb, 2000), from pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating polypeptide (Hansel et al., 2001), to C-type natriuretic peptide, along with the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Simpson et al., 2002), neurotrophin (Simpson et al., 2003), the leukemia inhibiting factor acting on immature OSNs (Moon et al., 2009), and more recently BDNF (Ortiz-Lopez et al., 2017).

Endothelin (ET) was first characterized as the strongest vasoconstrictive peptide (Yanagisawa et al., 1988) but has since been described as a pleiotropic peptide, acting on various cellular processes including cellular population dynamics in different tissues (Schinelli, 2006). Three peptides of 21 amino acids named ET-1 to ET-3 (Edn1 to Edn3) have been characterized, ET-1 being the most widely distributed (Khodorova et al., 2009). These peptides are secreted as pro-peptides (big-ETs), which are matured locally through peptidase endothelin-converting enzymes (mainly Ece1). They then act autocrinally and/or paracrinally on two different G protein-coupled receptors, named ETA and ETB (Ednra and Ednrb, respectively). The peptides along with their converting enzymes and receptors are expressed in the olfactory epithelium. This expression is particularly strong in the basal cell and neuronal cell layers in 10-day-old rats, with a similar level of expression for ETA and ETB (Le Bourhis et al., 2014). Endothelin acts as an anti-apoptotic factor in the OM (Laziz et al., 2011) but ET-1 is also known to act as a proliferative factor in the central nervous system (Vidovic et al., 2008). In the present study, we explored this potential role in the rat OM using primary culture and in vivo approaches.

Material and Methods

Animals

Male Wistar rat pups (Rattus norvegicus) were obtained from multiparous females, and housed in our local animal care facilities in 12-hour light, 12-hour dark cycles. Breeders were fed standard chow ad libitum. We performed nasal instillations on pups as described previously (Francois et al., 2013), either for one-week starting on day 3 or for 24 hours at the age of 9 days. For the one-week treatment, instillations were performed twice a day (at 9 a.m. and 6 p.m.) with 5 to 8 μL (increasing the volume by 0.5 μL every day) per nostril of either a mixture of endothelin receptor antagonists (BQ123 and BQ788, Sigma Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) at 10–5 M in PBS; referred to BQs in the following; n = 13/6 for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) experiments, respectively) or PBS with 10–4% of NaOH (pH 7.6; vehicle taking into account the initial dilution of BQ788 in 10–2% NaOH; n = 15/7 for PCNA and qPCR experiments, respectively). The higher concentration used in the nasal instillation compared to the treatment of the primary culture took into account the dilution in the mucus, as well as the low amount reaching the olfactory epithelium. Similar differences in treatment effectiveness have been observed among others for vasopressin treatments (Ludwig et al., 2013). For the one-day treatment starting at the age of 9 days, instillations were performed at 9 a.m., 6 p.m. and again at 9 p.m. the next day (n = 5/6 for 10−4% of NaOH/10−5 M BQs respectively). Pups were randomly allocated to treatments taking into account their weight (17.4 ± 0.53 g at the age of 9 days) and sex. Pups were euthanized 1h after the last instillation. For the OM primary culture, we used 2 pups for the quantification of OM primary culture confluence, six pups to prepare two independent experiments for the quantification of cellular population by lactate dehydrogenase content, two pups for the ET-1 quantification by enzyme immunoassay (EIA), two pups for reverse transcriptase-qPCR (RT-qPCR) and 6 pups for the calcium imaging.

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and approved by the Comité d’éthique en expérimentation animale COMETHEA (COMETHEA C2EA -45; protocol approval #12-058) on November 28, 2012. Investigators hold the Individual Authorization for Performing Experiments in Animals, including the animal’s experiments conducted in the present study (agreements #78-154/R-94ENVA-F1-12).

OM primary cultures

We used a long-term primary culture of rat OM cells as previously described (Gouadon et al., 2010). Briefly, for each experiment, two to three Wistar rats (7 to 10 day old) were euthanized by decapitation and their entire OM was dissected from the turbinates and the olfactory part of the septum. After enzymatic digestion and mechanical dissociation, the suspension was passed through a 40 µm filter to remove undigested material. After centrifugation through 10% new-born calf serum gradient (NCS; 150 × g, 10 minutes at room temperature), cells were suspended in sterile Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/ HamF12 based medium (DMEM/Ham F12; Eurobio, les Ulis, France) containing 10% NCS (Eurobio). They were plated at a density of approximately 120 cells/mm2 on 6-well plates (for qPCR assay), 12-well plates filled with a glass coverslip previously coated with 0.01% poly L-lysine (for confluence evolution measurement and calcium imaging), or 96-well plates (for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) measurements). Cells were grown at 37°C under 5% CO2. NCS level was reduced to 2% to limit the influence of external growth factors in order to evaluate the impact of ET-1 and endothelin receptor antagonists on cell proliferation.

Quantification of OM primary culture confluence

To measure the degree of confluence of the cellular culture, we took an average of 18 images per glass coverslip for each day of culture from day 2 to day 8. We used ImageJ (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997-2012) to quantify the percentage of total area filled by cells (n = 3 coverslips for each day).

Quantification of cellular population by LDH content

We assessed the growth of the OM primary culture following the different treatments by quantifying the content of LDH in the cells as described previously (Allen et al., 1994; Stander et al., 2018). The LDH concentration is proportional to the rate of NADH oxidation, and we thus measured activities of both the extracellular (related to the level of cellular death) and the intracellular LDH (related to the cellular population). This was respectively measured in the extracellular culture medium and in the primary cultured adherent cells extemporaneously lysed with PBT (PBS + 0.5% Triton X-100). Results were normalized to the control condition (CTL) for each culture (n = 8 from two independent primary cultures).

ET-1 measurement by EIA

ET-1 concentration in the OM primary culture medium was measured using a commercial EIA kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) according to the manufacturer instructions. Plates were read at 405 nm and compared to a standard curve. Data are presented either as the raw values of ET-1 concentrations or divided by the slope of NADH oxidation in the presence of intracellular LDH content. This last measure accounts for the production of ET-1 relative to the cellular population (n = 5/4/5 for day in vitro 3 (DIV3), DIV5 and DIV7 respectively from two independent primary cultures).

qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from OM primary culture cells using the Trizol method and subsequently treated with DNase I. OligodT first strand cDNA were synthesized from 5 μg total RNA by the Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France) following the manufacturer recommendations. 5 µL of 200-fold diluted cDNA templates were added to a 15 μL reaction mixture containing 200 nM primers (sequences are shown in Additional Table 1) and SYBR Green GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix (Promega, Charbonnieres, France). The expression levels of target genes were measured using the CFX Connect qPCR platform (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). A dissociation curve was carried out at the end of the PCR cycle to verify efficiency of primers to produce a single and specific PCR amplification. Quantification was achieved using the ΔΔCt method, and mRNA expression was normalized to the expression level of β-actin (Francois et al., 2016). An efficiency corrective factor was applied for each primer pair.

Additional Table 1.

Primers used for qPCR reactions

GenBank Accession number Sequences primers (5’>3’) Tm Size (pb)
ETA NM_012550.2 TTTGTGAGCAAGAAATTCAAAAA 59 110
CACTGGATACTCGTTCCATTCA 60
ETb NM_017333.1 TGGTATCAACATGGCTTCTTTG 60 115
AAACGTTTGGCACCAGCAG 62.2
ET-1 NM_012548.2 AGTGCTGGAATTTCTGCCAAG 61.7 132
CCACCAGCTGCTGATAGATACA 60.3
β- actin NM_031144.3 GACCCAGATCATGTTTGAGACCTT 60.57 61
CACAGCCTGGATGGCTACGT 62.24

Calcium imaging

OM primary culture responses to stimulations with ET-1 (10–7 M) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP, 10–4 M) were monitored using microscopic epifluorescence Ca2+ imaging. Cells were loaded with Fura-2 AM, using a dedicated Xcellence RT imaging station (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions – OSIS, Münster, Germany) as previously described (Gouadon et al., 2010). Standard image pairs of Fura-2 fluorescence, excited at 340 and 380 nm, were acquired at 510 nm at a frequency of 1 Hz, with short exposure times (200 ms) to minimize bleaching, using an UPlanApo oil immersion objective with a 10× magnification. Images were background subtracted and kinetics of Fura-2 fluorescence ratios 340/380 nm of defined regions of interest (ROI) were calculated offline and normalized to the baseline averaged ratio. Changes in fluorescence (F) were calculated relative to the averaged baseline (from 30 seconds before stimulation) and expressed as %?F/F ([(FFbaseline)/Fbaseline] × 100) using Xcellence RT software (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions OSIS, Münster, Germany).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry of OM tissue sections was performed as described previously (Laziz et al., 2011). Briefly, the nasal septum and turbinates were removed as a block and post-fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde PBS. Blocks were cryoprotected with sucrose (30%) and cryo-sectioned sagitally (14 μm thickness). Sections were kept frozen at –80°C until use. PCNA staining requires an antigen retrieval in a citrate buffer (pH 6) at 95°C for 30 minutes. Non-specific staining was blocked by incubation with 10% non-immune goat serum diluted in PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin and 0.3% Triton X-100. The sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies directed against PCNA (1:200; mouse monoclonal PC10, GeneTex; Tebu-bio SAS, Le Perray-en-Yvelines, France). Fluorescence staining was performed with Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated goat secondary antibodies (1:1000; Molecular Probes; Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France) for 150 minutes at room temperature. Immunohistochemistry was performed on medial transversal sections of the OM. We took 6 to 8 images located either dorso-medially at the base of the septum or on lateral turbinates similar to a recent study (Hasegawa-Ishii et al., 2017). Images were taken blind to the animal origin at 100× magnification using an Olympus IX71 inverted microscope equipped with an Orca ER Hamamatsu cooled CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics France, Massy, France). Images were quantified blind to the animal origin using ImageJ to threshold specific PCNA staining (Laziz et al., 2011). As the antigen retrieval treatment required for PCNA staining does not allow sufficient nuclear staining, we used the auto fluorescence of the olfactory epithelium at 555 nm excitation to measure its area. On each image, we measure the PCNA staining from an OE area averaging ~0.08 mm2. These measurements allowed us to quantify the percentage of PCNA staining area in the olfactory epithelium reflecting the level of proliferation.

Statistical analysis

Group data presented in the text and figures are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance was assessed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests, one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison post-hoc tests (GraphPad Prism 5.0, GraphPad software Inc., La Jolla, San Jose, CA, USA). A probability value of P < 0.05 was set for significant differences.

Results

ET-1 acts as a proliferative factor on OM primary culture cells

In order to confirm and quantify a potential proliferative action of ET-1 on OM cells, we treated an OM primary culture with ET-1 at 10–9 M every 48 hours from day 0 to day 4 in vitro (DIV; Figure 1A). We used a previously developed primary culture which is growing rapidly for one week in vitro before reaching confluence around DIV7 (Figure 1B). At DIV6, we measured the LDH content related to the cell population (Allen et al., 1994; Laziz et al., 2011). We observed a slight but significant increase in the LDH content after ET-1 treatment (Figure 1C; Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.016) showing that ET-1 could modify the cellular dynamic of the mucosa, resulting in increased cell density in the culture. Proliferative factors can be provided directly by the primary culture cells (Price, 2017) and big ET-1 and its converting enzyme to ET-1 are expressed by an OM primary culture (Gouadon et al., 2010). We thus hypothesized that a substantial local production of ET-1 could contribute to the primary culture growth. In order to test this possibility, we treated the primary culture with a mixture of BQ123 (ETA receptor antagonist) and BQ788 (ETB receptor antagonist) in the same conditions from DIV0 to DIV4. For simplicity, this mixture known to efficiently block both ET-1 receptors will be referred to BQs in the following. Treatment with BQs at 10–9 M significantly decreased the LDH content after 6 days of in vitro development (Figure 1D; Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.023). This decrease in intracellular LDH could be related to a BQs-induced antagonism in ET-1 proliferative action. Another possibility relies on a BQs-induced cellular death in the OM primary culture cells. Such cellular death would lead to an increase in LDH present in the extracellular medium (Laziz et al., 2011). We thus measured the level of LDH present in the primary culture medium after BQs treatment, finding great variability in the measurement as it was at the limit of detection (Figure 1E). LDH levels were also similar to the control condition and in the same range as basal LDH activity measured in the cell-free culture medium containing 2% NCS. The absence of cellular LDH release shows that the BQs treatments did not impact the cellular death level in the primary culture. Overall, these results suggest that ET-1 can be produced locally by the OM primary culture cells and actively promote cell growth.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is involved in olfactory mucosa (OM) primary culture cell growth.

(A) Experimental design. The OM primary culture was grown for 6 days in culture medium supplemented on days 0, 2 and 4 with either control medium (CTL), endothelin receptor agonist (ET-1) or antagonists (BQs, mixture of BQ123 and BQ788). (B) Dot plot representing the evolution of the confluence of the primary culture in the control condition (n = 3). One-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison post-hoc tests (different letters indicate statistically significant differences). (C, D) Dot plot representing the relative cellular density of the primary culture for various treatments. It was estimated by measuring the cellular lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) content and expressed as a relative value to the control condition. (E) Dot plot representing the level of extracellular LDH reflecting cellular death level. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8, from two independent cultures for the relative cellular density measurement and n = 4/6/6 for the relative extracellular LDH level measurement). Mann-Whitney U test (**P < 0.01).

OM primary culture produces ET-1 until reaching confluence

In order to characterize the level of local ET-1 production by the OM primary culture cells, we measured the presence of ET-1 in the medium of culture at DIV3, DIV5 and DIV7 directly by EIA (Figure 2A). ET-1 was not present in the primary culture medium without cells (0.03 ± 0.1 pg/mL, i.e., 0.012 pM; n = 4), but was present at DIV3 (36.9 ± 3.4 pg/mL, i.e., 14.8 pM; n = 5) and DIV5 (37.1 ± 3.1 pg/mL, i.e., 14.9 pM; n = 4). However at DIV7, ET-1 was no longer detectable (0.2 ± 0.5 pg/mL; n = 5). We normalized the level of ET-1 in the medium relative to the cellular density estimated from LDH content to express the production of ET-1 relative to the cellular density (Figure 2B). One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test showed that the ET-1 production significantly decreased from DIV3 to DIV7 (P < 0.001). This was consistent with RT-qPCR analysis showing that big-ET1 expression similarly decreased from DIV3 to DIV7 (Figure 2B; P = 0.003). By contrast, the expression of ETA and ETB receptors increased gradually with culture age (Figure 2C; P = 0.017 and 0.003, respectively).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is produced by olfactory mucosa primary culture cells until confluence.

(A) Phase contrast views of olfactory mucosa primary culture at different ages. The primary culture gradually grows until reaching confluence at day in vitro 7 (DIV7). Scale bar: 50 μm. (B, C) Dot plot representing the evolution of the relative ET-1 concentration in the OM primary culture extracellular medium and the mRNA relative level of big ET-1 or ET-1 receptors expressed by the OM primary culture cells. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5/4/5 for DIV3, DIV5 and DIV7, respectively, for ET-1 protein level assay; n = 6 for mRNA quantification). One-way analysis of variance (ns: non-significant; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).

OM primary culture cells do not respond to ET-1 stimulation until its endogenous production level decreases

Primary culture of OM cells are strongly desensitized after ET-1 stimulation (Gouadon et al., 2010). If ET-1 was secreted in the culture medium by OM cells, then they should not be responsive to ET-1 stimulation until ET-1 level decreases. We recorded from DIV1 to DIV8 the response of the OM primary culture cells to exogenous stimulation by ET-1 (10–7 M) and ATP (10–4 M) used as a positive control. While some OM cells were already sensitive to ATP at DIV1, they were not responsive to ET-1 before DIV6 and the largest differences between these two agonists were observed at DIV5 (Figure 3A and B). Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences between the percentage of cells responding according to the age of the culture (F(7,43) = 45.74, P < 0.001). The percentage of cells responding between ATP and ET-1 were also significantly different (F(7,43) = 11.46, P < 0.001) especially at DIV5 and DIV6 (Bonferroni multiple comparison post-hoc tests, P < 0.01). While the percentage of responding cells clearly varied according to the culture ages, no obvious effect of treatment was observed for the intensity of the calcium rise in the sensitive cells following ATP or ET-1 stimulation (Figure 3C). Globally, the calcium response intensity increased with culture age which is consistent with the increasing degree of differentiation and maturity of the OM primary culture cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Calcium imaging responses to endothelin-1 (ET-1) stimulation of the olfactory mucosa primary culture.

(A) Epifluorescence images before (saline), and after ET-1 or adenosine triphosphate (ATP) application on a DIV5 olfactory mucosa primary culture. Signal changes from the background in blue to white when fully activated. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) Evolution of the percentage of responding cells according to the age of the culture. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 or 4 for each day; two-way analysis of variance (***P < 0.001) followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison post-hoc tests (**P < 0.01)). (C) Intensity profiles of responding cells according to the age of the culture. Data are presented as mean percentage of ΔF/F (n range from 67 on day 1 to 2595 responding cells on day 8 for ET-1 stimulation and from 250 to 3296 for ATP stimulation).

Treatment of the OM in vivo with ET receptor antagonists impact on cellular proliferation

To evaluate the potential proliferative role of ET-1 in vivo, we next treated 3-day-old rat pups with intranasal instillations of BQs at 10–5 M during 1 week. We then evaluate the proliferation level by immunohistochemistry against PCNA, a marker of dividing cells (Ohta and Ichimura, 2000). We focused on two different zones of the olfactory epithelium based on a recent study showing that nasal instillation was differentially effective according to the OM localization (Hasegawa-Ishii et al., 2017). This epithelium can be divided in three sub-areas with the lowest one containing basal cells and young neurons (Moon et al., 2009). As expected, we observed a staining mainly above the lamina propria (Figure 4A). However, the percentage of PCNA stained area in the olfactory epithelium was not significantly modified by a treatment with a saline solution or the mixture of ET receptors antagonists in both zones evaluated (Figure 4B); Mann-Whitney U test; P = 0.317 and 0.903 for zones 1 and 2, respectively). Wondering if our treatment could impact the local production of ET-1, we measured by RT-qPCR the expression of big ET-1 and ET receptors in these conditions. Big ET-1 mRNA was indeed increased after the BQs treatment (Figure 4C; Mann-Whitney U test; P = 0.004). Expression of ET receptors was not significantly altered despite a slight tendency for a decrease in the expression of ETB in BQ-treated animals (Mann-Whitney U test; P = 0.522 and 0.072 for ETA and ETB, respectively). This result would indicate that the ET system in the OM adapted unexpectedly fast to the BQs treatment, so we next examined the impact of a 24-hour treatment with BQs on 9-day-old rat pups, which were euthanized at the same age as the previous group, i.e., at 10-day-old (Figure 5A). With this shorter treatment duration, we observed that the proliferation rate was decreased by the BQs treatment in the OM in both zones evaluated (Figure 5B; Mann-Whitney U test; P = 0.004 and 0.017 for zones 1 and 2, respectively).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Impact of 1 week of endothelin receptor antagonists (mixture of BQ123 and BQ788) instillation on the olfactory mucosa.

(A) Representative image of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) staining (green) in the olfactory epithelium (10-day-old pup). The highest proliferative responses are observed near the basal cells on the the basal lamina. The white dashed line represents the basal lamina, used to delimit the area of the olfactory epithelium; the dotted white lines represent the limits of the different cell layers corresponding to basal cells and immature neurons (YN for young neurons); mature neurons (MN) and sustentacular cells (SC). Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) The proliferation rate in the olfactory epithelium was evaluated by quantifying the area with PCNA staining in two different zones of the olfactory epithelium according to the left schematic drawing of the nasal cavity. Data are presented as mean of PCNA signal area normalized to the control condition ± SEM (n = 15/13 for CTL and BQs (mixture of BQ123 and BQ788 at 10–5 M) treatments, respectively). (C) Dot plot representing the mRNA relative level of big ET-1 or ET-1 receptors expressed in the olfactory mucosa. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 7/6 for CTL and BQs treatments, respectively). Mann-Whitney U test (ns: non-significant, **P < 0.01).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Impact of 1 day of endothelin receptor antagonist (mixture of BQ123 and BQ788) instillation on the olfactory mucosa.

(A) Representative image of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) staining (green) in the olfactory epithelium after 1 day of BQs nasal instillation (10-day-old pup). The white dashed line represents the basal lamina, used to delimit the area of the OE; the dotted white lines represent the limits of the different cell layers corresponding to basal cells and immature neurons (YN for young neurons); mature neurons (MN) and sustentacular cells (SC). Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) The proliferation rate in the olfactory epithelium was evaluated by quantifying the area with PCNA staining in two different zones of the olfactory epithelium according to the upper schematic drawing of the nasal cavity. Data are presented as mean of PCNA signal area normalized to control condition ± SEM (n = 5/6 for CTL and BQs (mixture of BQ123 and BQ788 at 10–5 M) treatments, respectively). Mann-Whitney U test (**P < 0.01).

Discussion

Since the first description of ET-1 as a potent vasoconstrictive peptide (Yanagisawa et al., 1988), multiple roles have been identified for this pleiotropic peptide (Davenport et al., 2016). Its action on cellular dynamics has been extensively described (Komuro et al., 1988), especially in relation to cancer (Bagnato et al., 2011). In the nervous system, endothelin acts as a proliferative factor on astrocytes during gliosis (Gadea et al., 2008) and on neuronal precursors in the cerebellum during rat pups development (Vidovic et al., 2008). ET-1 receptors and its precursor big ET-1 along with its converting enzymes are strongly expressed in the OM (Le Bourhis et al., 2014). As the OM is permanently renewing, we explored here a potential proliferative role of endothelin on OM cells.

Using primary cultures of OM cells, we first found that ET-1 supplementation in the culture medium increased the LDH level related to cellular population. We performed several experiments showing that ET-1 was produced directly by the primary culture. First, we observed that the treatment of the culture with a mixture of ET receptors antagonists (BQ123 and BQ788) impaired the culture growth. In previous studies, these antagonists were effective to specifically block the cellular response to ET-1 mediated by both ETA and ETB receptors (Gouadon et al., 2010). The inhibition of the cellular culture growth by ET antagonist treatments suggests an endogenous production of ET-1 by the primary culture cells. Using EIA, we observed that while absent from the initial culture medium, ET-1 appears in the extracellular medium as soon as DIV3 and its concentration remains stable at DIV5 before decreasing at DIV7. The level of ET-1 concentration at DIV3 and DIV5 was consistent with other studies (Celik et al., 2013; Maffei et al., 2014) supporting the likelihood of its importance in OM cellular dynamics. This was also consistent with RT-qPCR results showing an important expression of big ET-1 at DIV3 and DIV5 which decreased at DIV7. Using calcium imaging, we took advantage of the strong desensitization of OM cells to ET-1 stimulation to indirectly explore whether endogenous ET-1 was present in the primary culture medium. Our results indicate that ET-1 was produced by the OM cells as soon as DIV1 and until DIV6 when the concentration dropped as revealed by the increased sensitivity of the OM cells to external ET-1 stimulation. This increased sensitivity could also arise from an increased expression level of endothelin receptors. However, although their expression increased already at DIV5, the primary culture cells were unresponsive to ET-1 while being sensitive to ATP stimulation. This increase in endothelin receptor levels may reflect the progressive differentiation of OM cells in the culture (Gouadon et al., 2010). The fact that ET-1 was effective to modulate cellular dynamics prior to DIV6 but could not elicit calcium imaging response may seem counterintuitive. However, calcium imaging may not be sensitive enough to record a small increase in cellular activity when supplementary ET-1 was added in the culture medium. Overall, these results are consistent with a production of ET-1 by the OM primary culture until cells reach confluence. The production of proliferative factors by cell culture is a classic feature of conditioned cultured medium (Price, 2017), which has already been described for ET-1 (Maffei et al., 2014) and this raises the question of its importance in the OM in vivo.

To answer this question, we used a protocol consisting of 7 days of nasal instillations of endothelin receptor antagonists in rat pups (Francois et al., 2013). Surprisingly, the proliferation rate in the OM was not affected by this treatment. RT-qPCR analyses revealed, however, that the local production of endothelin was increased showing an adaptation of the ET-1 production in the OM following the endothelin receptor antagonists treatments. Shorter BQs treatments were effective in reducing the proliferation cell rate in the OM, which confirms our in vitro observations of a proliferative role of ET-1 in the OM. We used the saline vehicle as a control and thus the observed effect could be a result of a non-specific action of BQs nasal instillations. This is unlikely as the 7-day BQs treatment did not affect the proliferation of the OM while consistently increasing the expression of big ET-1. A recent study showed that nasal instillations were much more effective in the lateral turbinates corresponding to the zone 2 evaluated here (Hasegawa-Ishii et al., 2017). However, we found no differences of the one-day BQs treatment between the zones evaluated indicating that our nasal instillation protocol was effective in reaching both zones. The difference in the results may be related to the turbinate organization and the experimental protocol, as Hasegawa-Ishii and co-workers used anesthetized adult mice while we used awake young rats. The localization of PCNA staining corresponds to the basal cells and young neurons as described previously (Moon et al., 2009; Francois et al., 2016). As horizontal basal cells are usually involved in OE proliferation (Schwob et al., 2017), they are probably the cells impacted by the ET-1 treatment but further experiments are required to confirm it.

ET-1 acts as an anti-apoptotic factor in the OM (Laziz et al., 2011). Therefore the ET-1 impact on the OM primary culture may not be caused by a proliferative action but instead to a decreased apoptosis level following ET-1 treatment. Conversely, the impact of the treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists (BQs) could be related to an increased level of apoptosis. While we cannot completely rule out this possibility, it seems unlikely for several reasons. Firstly, treatment with BQs was effective in reducing the primary culture cell density at DIV6 without increasing the LDH level in the primary culture medium. Extracellular LDH concentration reflects the level of cellular death, indicating that BQs treatment did not increase significantly the apoptosis level while strongly decreasing the cellular population. Secondly, a treatment of 7 days of BQs nasal instillations increases the apoptosis level in the OM (Francois et al., 2013) but we did not observed any impact of BQs on proliferation probably because endogenous production of ET-1 was increased to limit BQs actions. However, we observed a strong decrease of proliferation in the OM after one day of BQs treatment which is consistent with a proliferative role of endogenous endothelin. As all the present experiments were performed on young animals and primary culture, this proliferation may be more related to the development of the animal than regeneration of the OE. Further studies are required to answer this question.

The regulation of endothelin secretion still remains to be explored. Our observation that BQs treatments are sufficient to increase the level of endogenous expression of big ET-1 suggests that there is probably an autocrine mechanism involved in its regulation in the OM. Such autocrine actions of ET-1 have already been described on keratinocytes (Bagnato et al., 1995) and dendritic cells (Guruli et al., 2004).

Overall, these results show that endothelin acts pleiotropically in the OM as an anti-apoptotic (Laziz et al., 2011) and proliferative factor as well as a GAP junction blocker (Le Bourhis et al., 2014). As the OM is a potential source for cellular grafts to regenerate injured neuronal tissue, the use of endothelin may thus help to improve this therapeutic approach.

Additional file:

Additional Table 1: Primers used for qPCR reactions.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Birte Nielsen (Neurobiologie de l’olfaction, Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France) for her help in improving the manuscript, Patrice Dahirel and Aurelien Raynaud (Neurobiologie de l’olfaction, Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France) for animal care and treatments; Stéphanie Rimbaud, Denise Grébert, Sacha Muszlak (Neurobiologie de l’olfaction, Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France) and Nicolas Martin (MSc Student, Université Versailles St Quentin, France) for technical help.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Financial support: This work was funded by the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA).

Institutional review board statement: All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and approved by the Comité d’éthique en expérimentation animale COMETHEA (COMETHEA C2EA -45; protocol approval #12-058) on November 28, 2012.

Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.

Data sharing statement: Datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

C-Editors: Zhao M, Li CH; T-Editor: Jia Y

Funding: This work was funded by the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA).

References

  • 1.Allen M, Millett P, Dawes E, Rushton N. Lactate dehydrogenase activity as a rapid and sensitive test for the quantification of cell numbers in vitro. Clin Mater. 1994;16:189–194. doi: 10.1016/0267-6605(94)90116-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bagnato A, Venuti A, Di Castro V, Marcante ML. Identification of the ETA receptor subtype that mediates endothelin induced autocrine proliferation of normal human keratinocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;209:80–86. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bagnato A, Loizidou M, Pflug BR, Curwen J, Growcott J. Role of the endothelin axis and its antagonists in the treatment of cancer. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163:220–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01217.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brann JH, Firestein SJ. A lifetime of neurogenesis in the olfactory system. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:182. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Celik H, Avci B, Işik Y. Vascular endothelial growth factor and endothelin-1 levels in normal pregnant women and pregnant women with pre-eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33:355–358. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.769944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Davenport AP, Hyndman KA, Dhaun N, Southan C, Kohan DE, Pollock JS, Pollock DM, Webb DJ, Maguire JJ. Endothelin. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68:357–418. doi: 10.1124/pr.115.011833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Francois A, Laziz I, Rimbaud S, Grebert D, Durieux D, Pajot-Augy E, Meunier N. Early survival factor deprivation in the olfactory epithelium enhances activity-driven survival. Front Cell Neurosci. 2013;7:271. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Francois A, Grebert D, Rhimi M, Mariadassou M, Naudon L, Rabot S, Meunier N. Olfactory epithelium changes in germfree mice. 2016 doi: 10.1038/srep24687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gadea A, Schinelli S, Gallo V. Endothelin-1 regulates astrocyte proliferation and reactive gliosis via a JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2394–2408. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5652-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gouadon E, Meunier N, Grebert D, Durieux D, Baly C, Salesse R, Caillol M, Congar P. Endothelin evokes distinct calcium transients in neuronal and non-neuronal cells of rat olfactory mucosa primary cultures. Neuroscience. 2010;165:584–600. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Graziadei PP. Cell dynamics in the olfactory mucosa. Tissue Cell. 1973;5:113–131. doi: 10.1016/s0040-8166(73)80010-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guruli G, Pflug BR, Pecher S, Makarenkova V, Shurin MR, Nelson JB. Function and survival of dendritic cells depend on endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor autocrine loops. Blood. 2004;104:2107–2115. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hansel DE, May V, Eipper BA, Ronnett GV. Pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating peptides and alpha-amidation in olfactory neurogenesis and neuronal survival in vitro. J Neurosci. 2001;21:4625–4636. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-13-04625.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hasegawa-Ishii S, Shimada A, Imamura F. Lipopolysaccharide-initiated persistent rhinitis causes gliosis and synaptic loss in the olfactory bulb. 2017 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10229-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khodorova A, Montmayeur JP, Strichartz G. Endothelin receptors and pain. J Pain. 2009;10:4–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Komuro I, Kurihara H, Sugiyama T, Yoshizumi M, Takaku F, Yazaki Y. Endothelin stimulates c-fos and c-myc expression and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 1988;238:249–252. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80489-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Laziz I, Larbi A, Grebert D, Sautel M, Congar P, Lacroix MC, Salesse R, Meunier N. Endothelin as a neuroprotective factor in the olfactory epithelium. Neuroscience. 2011;172:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.10.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Le Bourhis M, Rimbaud S, Grebert D, Congar P, Meunier N. Endothelin uncouples gap junctions in sustentacular cells and olfactory ensheathing cells of the olfactory mucosa. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;40:2878–2887. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ludwig M, Tobin VA, Callahan MF, Papadaki E, Becker A, Engelmann M, Leng G. Intranasal application of vasopressin fails to elicit changes in brain immediate early gene expression, neural activity and behavioural performance of rats. J Neuroendocrinol. 2013;25:655–667. doi: 10.1111/jne.12046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mackay-Sima A, Chuahb MI. Neurotrophic factors in the primary olfactory pathway. Prog Neurobiol. 2000;62:527–559. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00009-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maffei R, Bulgarelli J, Fiorcari S, Martinelli S, Castelli I, Valenti V, Rossi D, Bonacorsi G, Zucchini P, Potenza L, Vallisa D, Gattei V, Del Poeta G, Forconi F, Gaidano G, Narni F, Luppi M, Marasca R. Endothelin-1 promotes survival and chemoresistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells through ETA receptor. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moon C, Liu BQ, Kim SY, Kim EJ, Park YJ, Yoo JY, Han HS, Bae YC, Ronnett GV. Leukemia inhibitory factor promotes olfactory sensory neuronal survival via phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway activation and Bcl-2. J Neurosci Res. 2009;87:1098–1106. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ohta Y, Ichimura K. Proliferation markers, proliferating cell nuclear antigen Ki67 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine, and cyclin D1 in mouse olfactory epithelium. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109:1046–1048. doi: 10.1177/000348940010901110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ortiz-Lopez L, Gonzalez-Olvera JJ, Vega-Rivera NM, Garcia-Anaya M, Carapia-Hernandez AK, Velazquez-Escobar JC, Ramirez-Rodriguez GB. Human neural stem/progenitor cells derived from the olfactory epithelium express the TrkB receptor and migrate in response to BDNF. Neuroscience. 2017;355:84–100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Price PJ. Best practices for media selection for mammalian cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2017;53:673–681. doi: 10.1007/s11626-017-0186-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schinelli S. Pharmacology and physiopathology of the brain endothelin system: an overview. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13:627–638. doi: 10.2174/092986706776055652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schwob JE. Neural regeneration and the peripheral olfactory system. Anat Rec. 2002;269:33–49. doi: 10.1002/ar.10047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schwob JE, Jang W, Holbrook EH, Lin B, Herrick DB, Peterson JN, Hewitt Coleman J. Stem and progenitor cells of the mammalian olfactory epithelium: Taking poietic license. J Comp Neurol. 2017;525:1034–1054. doi: 10.1002/cne.24105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Simpson PJ, Miller I, Moon C, Hanlon AL, Liebl DJ, Ronnett GV. Atrial natriuretic peptide type C induces a cell-cycle switch from proliferation to differentiation in brain-derived neurotrophic factor- or nerve growth factor-primed olfactory receptor neurons. J Neurosci. 2002;22:5536–5551. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05536.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Simpson PJ, Wang E, Moon C, Matarazzo V, Cohen DR, Liebl DJ, Ronnett GV. Neurotrophin-3 signaling maintains maturational homeostasis between neuronal populations in the olfactory epithelium. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2003;24:858–874. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2003.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stander BA, van Vollenstee FA, Kallmeyer K, Potgieter M, Joubert A, Swanepoel A, Kotze L, Moolman S, Pepper MS. An in vitro and in vivo study on the properties of hollow polycaprolactone cell-delivery particles. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0198248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vidovic M, Chen MM, Lu QY, Kalloniatis KF, Martin BM, Tan AH, Lynch C, Croaker GD, Cass DT, Song ZM. Deficiency in endothelin receptor B reduces proliferation of neuronal progenitors and increases apoptosis in postnatal rat cerebellum. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2008;28:1129–1138. doi: 10.1007/s10571-008-9292-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988;332:411–415. doi: 10.1038/332411a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yao R, Murtaza M, Velasquez JT, Todorovic M, Rayfield A, Ekberg J, Barton M, St John J. Olfactory ensheathing cells for spinal cord injury: sniffing out the issues. Cell Transplant. 2018;27:879–889. doi: 10.1177/0963689718779353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neural Regeneration Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES