Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2019 Dec 11;10:5651. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13406-9

Detection of the 5p – 4f orbital crossing and its optical clock transition in Pr9+

H Bekker 1,6, A Borschevsky 2, Z Harman 1, C H Keitel 1, T Pfeifer 1, P O Schmidt 3,4, J R Crespo López-Urrutia 1, J C Berengut 1,5,
PMCID: PMC6906385  PMID: 31827086

Abstract

Recent theoretical works have proposed atomic clocks based on narrow optical transitions in highly charged ions. The most interesting candidates for searches of physics beyond the Standard Model are those which occur at rare orbital crossings where the shell structure of the periodic table is reordered. There are only three such crossings expected to be accessible in highly charged ions, and hitherto none have been observed as both experiment and theory have proven difficult. In this work we observe an orbital crossing in a system chosen to be tractable from both sides: Pr9+. We present electron beam ion trap measurements of its spectra, including the inter-configuration lines that reveal the sought-after crossing. With state-of-the-art calculations we show that the proposed nHz-wide clock line has a very high sensitivity to variation of the fine-structure constant, α, and violation of local Lorentz invariance; and has extremely low sensitivity to external perturbations.

Subject terms: Electronic structure of atoms and molecules, Exotic atoms and molecules


Atomic clocks are based on the frequency of optical transitions and offer high precision. Here the authors demonstrate a configuration crossing in the highly charged ion praseodymium (Pr9+) and determine the frequency of a potential reference transition for a highly charged ion clock.

Introduction

Current single ion clocks reach fractional frequency uncertainties δνν around 1018, and enable sensitive tests of relativity and searches for potential variations in fundamental constants15. These experiments could be improved by exploiting clock transitions with a much reduced sensitivity to frequency shifts caused by external perturbations. Transitions in highly charged ions (HCI) naturally meet this requirement due to their spatially compact wave functions6,7. Unfortunately, in most cases this raises the transition frequencies beyond the range of current precision lasers. While some forbidden fine-structure transitions remain in the optical range, these are generally insensitive to physics beyond the Standard Model. More interestingly, at configuration crossings due to re-orderings of electronic orbital binding energies along an isoelectronic sequence, many optical transitions between the nearly degenerate configurations can exist7,8. For the 5p and 4f orbitals, this was predicted to occur at Sn-like Pr9+, see Fig. 1. Here, the 5p23P05p4f3G3 magnetic octupole (M3) transition seems ideally suited for an ultra-precise atomic clock and searches for physics beyond the Standard Model with HCI810, recently reviewed in ref. 11. It is highly sensitive to potential variation of the fine-structure constant, α, and to violation of local Lorentz invariance (LLI).

Fig. 1. The 5p4f orbital crossing and level structures of selected ions along the isoelectronic sequence.

Fig. 1

a Configuration-averaged binding energies for relevant configurations of the Sn-like (50 electron) isoelectronic sequence, as a function of atomic number Z. bd Grotrian diagrams for low-lying levels of the 5p2, 5p4f, and 4f2 configurations for Z=56, 59, and 62, respectively. Pr9+ is situated close to the configuration crossing point, and the corresponding diagram shows that inter-configuration optical transitions are allowed. Fig. 1c shows lines that were measured (blue) in the electron beam ion trap (EBIT). Strongly mixed J=2 levels are indicated with multiple colors. We identified potential clock transitions (dashed magenta lines), which are not observable in the EBIT.

With two electrons above closed shells, Pr9+ has a less complex electronic structure than the open 4f-shell systems studied in previous works1214. Nonetheless, predictions do not reach the accuracy needed for finding the clock transition in a precision laser spectroscopy experiment.

In the following, we present measurements of all the optical magnetic-dipole (M1) transitions with rates of at least order 100 s1 taking place between the fine-structure states of the 5p2 and 5p4f configurations. Since these configurations have both even parity, strongly mixed levels exist, allowing for relatively strong M1 transitions between them. By measuring these and applying the Rydberg-Ritz combination principle, the wavelength of the extremely weak clock transition is inferred to be 452.334(1) nm. Our calculations show that the proposed nHz-wide clock line, proceeds through hyperfine admixture of its upper state with an E2-decaying level. Moreover, we find that it has competitive sensitivities to physics beyond the Standard Model. These favorable properties can be exploited with the detailed experimental scheme that we propose.

Results

Measurement and identification of the lines

The Heidelberg electron beam ion trap (HD-EBIT) was employed to produce and trap Pr9+ ions15. In this setup, a magnetically focused electron beam traverses a tenuous beam of C33H60O6Pr molecules (CAS number 15492-48-5), which are disassociated by electron impact; further impacts sequentially raise the charge state of the ions until the electron beam energy cannot overcome the binding energy of the outermost electron. The combination of negative space-charge potential of the electron beam and voltages applied to the set of hollow electrodes (called drift tubes) trap the HCI inside the central drift tube. By suitably lowering the longitudinal trapping potential caused by the drift tubes, lower ionization states are preferentially evaporated, so that predominantly Pr9+ ions remain trapped. Several million of these form a cylindrical cloud with a length of ~5 cm and radius of 200 μm. Electron-impact excitation of the HCI steadily populates states which then decay along many different fluorescent channels. Spectra in the range from 220 to 550 nm were recorded using a 2-m focal length Czerny Turner type spectrometer equipped with a cooled CCD camera16. Exploratory searches with a broad entrance slit detected weak lines at reduced resolution. By monitoring the line intensities while scanning the electron beam energy we determined their respective charge state, finding 22 Pr9+ lines in total; see Fig. 1c. The charge state identification was made on the basis of a comparison between the estimated electron beam energy at maximum intensity of the lines (135(10) eV), and the predicted ionization energy of Pr9+ (147 eV). Here, lines from neighboring charge states appear approximately an order of magnitude weaker compared to their respective maximal intensity. Tentative line identifications were based on wavelengths and line strengths predicted from ab initio calculations. Our Fock-space coupled-cluster17 calculations were found to reproduce the spectra with average difference (theory experiment) 14(28) meV, while our AMBiT18 calculations (implementing particle-hole configuration interaction with many-body perturbation theory) were accurate to 23(29) meV (see Methods for further details). Intensity ratios of the lines were compared to predictions by taking into account the wavelength-dependent efficiency of the spectrometer setup and the Pr9+ population distribution in the EBIT. The latter was determined from collisional radiative modeling using the Flexible Atomic Code (FAC)19.

For confirmation and determination of level energies at the part-per-million level, high-resolution measurements were carried out. This revealed their characteristic Zeeman splittings in the B = 8.000(5) T magnetic field at the trap center. Since the only stable Pr isotope (A = 141) has a rather large nuclear magnetic moment and a nuclear spin of I=52, hyperfine structure (HFS) had to be taken into account to fit the line shapes. We extended the previously employed Zeeman model12,16, to include HFS in the Paschen-Back regime because μBBAHFS for the involved states. We performed a global fit of the complete dataset to ensure consistent gJ factors extracted from lines connecting to the same fine-structure levels. The good agreement of these with AMBiT predictions conclusively confirmed our line identifications, see Fig. 2, Table 1, and Table 2. Level energies with respect to the 5p23P0 ground state were determined from the wavelengths using the LOPT program20, yielding those necessary to address the 5p4f3F2 and 5p4f3G3 clock states, see Table 1. A prominent example of configuration crossing is given by the 5p4f3D1 and the 5p23P2 levels: their separation of 19 cm1 is comparable to Zeeman splitting in the strong magnetic field. This leads to a pronounced quantum interference of the magnetic substates and to an asymmetry of the emission spectra of the above fine-structure levels when decaying to the 5p4f3F2 state (see Fig. 2), also seen in e.g. the D lines of alkali metals21. The non-diagonal Zeeman matrix element between the near-degenerate fine-structure states, characterizing the magnitude of interference, was extracted by fitting the experimental line shapes, and was found to be in good agreement with AMBiT  predictions. The magnetic field strength acts in this setting as a control parameter of quantum interference. In future laser-based high-precision measurements, a much weaker magnetic field will be used. This will minimize interference and enable a better determination of field-free transition energies, and consequently of the clock lines.

Fig. 2. Spectra of four distinctive Pr9+ lines.

Fig. 2

The measured spectra (black) were fitted with the hyperfine Paschen-Back model shown in red; blue arrows indicate the positions and relative strengths of Zeeman components (collapsing the hyperfine substructure for a clearer presentation). The orange fit in the lower panel includes the effect of Zeeman mixing of the 5p4f3D1 and 5p23P2 levels.

Table 1.

Overview and comparison of values relevant to the atomic structure of Pr9+.

Level Energy (cm1) gJ AHFS q
Expt. AMBiT ΔE FSCC ΔE 4-val10 ΔE Expt. AMBiT (GHz) (cm1)
5p23P0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5p4f3G3 22,101.36(5) 21,368 −733 22,248 147 21,895(450) −206 0.875(2) 0.853 7.771 69,918
5p4f3F2 24,494.00(5) 23,845 −649 24,525 31 24,199(370) −295 0.889(5) 0.883 −1.688 64,699
5p4f3D3 27,287.09(5) 26,372 −915 27,575 288 27,002(570) −285 1.136(4) 1.145 −3.857 74,073
5p23P1 28,561.063(6) 27,789 −772 28,526 −35 28,436(320) −125 1.487(3) 1.5 −3.203 39,097
5p4f3G4a 29,230.87(6) 28,367 −864 29,482 251 29,343(590) 112 1.130(3) 1.115 5.692 74,358
5p23D2 36,407.48(6) 35,550 −857 35,980 −427 36,217(380) −190 1.19(1) 1.139 11.004 51,620
5p4f3F3 55,662.43(5) 54,852 −810 55,737 75 55,220(710) −442 0.940(2) 0.943 2.568 110,266
5p4f3F4 59,184.84(5) 58,469 −716 59,393 208 1.158(2) 1.161 2.31 112,108
5p23F2 62,182.14(2) 61,325 −857 62,380 198 1.028(5) 1.054 2.224 101,716
5p4f3G5 63,924.17(6) 62,788 −1136 64,214 290 1.202(2) 1.2 2.347 113,269
5p4f1F3 63,963.57(6) 62,721 −1243 64,379 415 1.197(6) 1.226 0.485 112,004
5p23P2 67,290.97(5) 66,350 −941 67,343 52 1.210(4) 1.207 2.331 98,759
5p4f3D1 67,309.3(1) 66,429 −880 67,925 616 0.54(1) 0.5 −2.432 110,679
5p4f3G4b 69,861.70(8) 68,528 −1334 70,193 331 1.039(4) 1.023 2.62 111,833
4f23F2 79,693 81,801 0.813 1.026 118,508
5p4f1D2 80,569 82,657 0.907 1.555 123,702

Measured values are shown in the Expt. columns. Calculated energies and Landé gJ factors of the Pr9+ states stem from AMBiT, Fock-space coupled-cluster (FSCC), and CI+all-order calculations with four valence electrons (4-val). Magnetic-dipole hyperfine structure constants AHFS and sensitivities to α-variation q were calculated using the AMBiT code

Table 2.

Energies and rates of Pr9+ lines. The measured values (Expt.) include a 1 standard deviation uncertainty given in brackets, they are compared to ab initio theory predictions.

Lower Upper Energy (eV) Rate (s1)
Expt. AMBiT FSCC
5p23D2 5p23F2 3.19563(1) 3.1957 3.2732
5p4f3D3 5p4f3F3 3.51807(2) 3.5311 3.4916
5p23P0 5p23P1 3.5411202(8) 3.4454 3.5368 1021
5p4f3G4a 5p4f3F4 3.713810(3) 3.7322 3.7085 1086
5p23D2 5p23P2 3.829068(5) 3.8187 3.8885 374
5p4f3F2 5p4f3F3 3.864391(3) 3.8444 3.8698 823
5p4f3D3 5p4f3F4 3.954826(3) 3.9795 3.9449 675
5p4f3G3 5p4f3F3 4.161043(2) 4.1515 4.1521 1342
5p23P1 5p23F2 4.168481(3) 4.1579 4.1974 493
5p4f3G4a 5p4f3G5 4.301421(1) 4.2677 4.3062 4334
5p4f3G4a 5p4f1F3 4.306314(3) 4.2594 4.3267 640
5p4f3D3 5p4f1F3 4.547299(3) 4.5067 4.5631 1991
5p4f3G3 5p4f3F4 4.597753(6) 4.5999 4.6054 1660
5p4f3F2 5p23F2 4.672740(8) 4.6469 4.6934 483
5p23P1 5p23P2 4.80191(1) 4.7810 4.8127 1060
5p4f3D3 5p23P2 4.959843(4) 4.9566 4.9306 762
5p4f3G3 5p23F2 4.969391(7) 4.9540 4.9757 386
5p4f3G4a 5p4f3G4b 5.037586(9) 4.9793 5.0475 876
5p4f3G3 5p4f1F3 5.19021(2) 5.1271 5.2236 252
5p4f3D3 5p4f3G4b 5.27855(2) 5.2267 5.2840 878
5p4f3F2 5p23P2 5.30616(2) 5.2699 5.3088 1022
5p4f3F2 5p4f3D1 5.30842(2) 5.2797 5.3809 1199

The rate is calculated using theoretical matrix elements from AMBiT and experimental transition frequencies

Properties of the clock transition

After discovering this orbital crossing and the interesting clock transition, in the following we discuss its properties. Without HFS, the 5p4f3G3 state would decay through a hugely suppressed M3 transition with a lifetime of order 10 million years – a 3 fHz linewidth. However, admixture with the 5p4f3F2 state by hyperfine coupling induces much faster E2 transitions (lifetime ~years) with widths on the order of nHz, see Fig. 3. In state-of-the-art optical clocks such transitions have been probed4 and become accessible in HCI using well-established quantum-logic spectroscopy techniques2224. The 3G3F=112 state is decoupled from the ground state but decays to the F=92 component with a lifetime of 400 years. For comparison, the 5p4f3F2 E2 transition to the ground state has a much broader linewidth of 6.4 mHz, similar to that of the Al+ clock5,25.

Fig. 3. Schematic level diagram.

Fig. 3

Shown are the ground and lowest two fine-structure states in Pr9+ between which the clock transitions take place, energy splittings not to scale. Levels with the same total angular momentum F=I+J are admixed by the magnetic hyperfine interaction, allowing the 3G3 clock states to decay via E2 transition rather than M3, which would take of order 10 million years to decay.

Blackbody-radiation (BBR) shift is a dominant source of systematic uncertainty in some atomic clocks such as Yb+4. However, the static dipole polarisability αS (to which the BBR shift is proportional) is strongly suppressed in HCI by both the reduced size of the valence electron wave functions and the typically large separations between mixed levels of opposite parity. Together, these lead to a scaling αS~1Za4 where Za is the effective screened charge that the valence electron experiences8. Our calculations of the static polarisability for Pr9+ yield for the clock state of αS=2.4 a.u. and confirm the expected suppression. Furthermore, the ground state polarisability is rather similar, so the differential polarisability for the clock transition is ΔαS=0.05 a.u., ten times smaller than that of the excellent Al+ clock transition with ΔαS=0.43(6) a.u.5. An atomic clock based on Pr9+ would therefore be extremely resilient to BBR even at room temperature.

Beyond their favourable metrological properties, HCI have been suggested for probing variation of fundamental constants due to their high sensitivity to this6,7. Sensitivity to α variation of a transition with frequency ω is usually characterized by the parameter q, defined by the equation

ω=ω0+qx 1

where ω0 is the frequency at the present-day value of the fine-structure constant α0 and x=(αα0)21. Calculated q values for Pr9+ levels are presented in Table 1, and compared to other proposed transitions in Table 3. The Pr9+ M3 clock transition has a sensitivity similar to that of the 467 nm E3 clock transition in Yb+, 4f146s2S124f136s22F72 (q=64000 cm126), but with opposite sign. The sign change can be understood in the single-particle model: the Yb+ transition is 4f6s, while in Pr9+ it is 5p4f, leading to opposite sign. Comparison of these two clocks would therefore lead to improved limits on α variation and allow control of systematics.

Table 3.

Predicted sensitivities to physics beyond the Standard Model.

Ion Ref. Level K JT(2)J
Pr9+ 5p4f3G3 6.32 74.2
5p4f3F2 5.28 57.8
Ca+ 29 3d2D32 7.09 (12)
3d2D52 9.25 (15)
Yb+ 64,65 4f145d2D32 1.00 9.96
4f145d2D52 1.03 12.08
4f136s22F72 −5.95 −135.2
Dy 28,65 4f105d6sJ=10 0.77 69.48
4f95d26sJ=10 2.55 49.73
Hg+ 1,65 5d96s22D52 −2.94

The relative sensitivity to variation of the fine-structure constant K=2qω is given with respect to the ground state, but note that in dysprosium the fractional sensitivity of transitions between the two upper levels is many orders of magnitude higher since these levels are almost degenerate. Sensitivity to local Lorentz invariance is represented with the reduced matrix elements of the T(2) operator, given in atomic units

We also investigate the sensitivity of the clock transitions to invariance under local Lorentz transformations. LLI is a fundamental feature of the Standard Model and has been tested in all sectors of physics27. While Michelson-Morley experiments verify the isotropy of the speed of light, recent atomic experiments have placed strong limits on LLI-breaking parameters in the electron-photon sector28,29. The sensitivity of transitions for such studies is given by the reduced matrix element of T(2), defined by

T0(2)=cγ0γp3γzpz 2

where c is the speed of light, (γ0, γ) are Dirac matrices, and p is the momentum of a bound electron. We find JT(2)J=74.2 a.u. for the 3G3 state, similar in magnitude to the most sensitive Dy and Yb+ clock transitions, see Table 3. Again, the sign is opposite to Yb+ E3, making their comparison more powerful and improving the control of potential systematic effects. Furthermore, the value compares well with other HCI30.

Proposal for precision laser spectroscopy

Future precision spectroscopy of the clock transitions will require that the internal Pr9+ state be prepared and detected using quantum-logic protocols in HCI that are sympathetically cooled in a cryogenic Paul trap31,32. Populations calculated using FAC show that a Pr9+ ion ejected from the EBIT ends up after a few minutes in either the 3P0 (25%) or 3G3 state (75%). We propose to employ state-dependent oscillating optical dipole forces (ODF) formed by two counter-propagating laser beams detuned by one of the trapping frequencies of the two-ion crystal with respect to each other. Electronic- and hyperfine-state selectivity may be achieved by tuning the ODF near one of the HCI resonances. If the HCI is in the target state, the ODF exerts an oscillating force onto the HCI. This displaces its motional state, which can be detected efficiently on the co-trapped Be+ ion23,33, further enhanced by employing non-classical states of motion34. We estimate an achievable displacement rate of tens of kHz exciting coherent states of motion for realistic parameters of laser radiation at 408 nm detuned by 1 MHz from the 3P05p4f3F2 transition. Similarly, motional excitation rates of a few kHz can be achieved by detuning laser radiation at 452 nm by 10 Hz from the nHz-wide 3P03G3 clock transition. Since the ion is long-lived in both states, we distinguish between the two clock states by detuning the beams forming the ODF to additionally change the magnetic substate24. State selectivity can be provided by the global detuning of the ODF and the unique g-factor of the electronic and hyperfine states. In case the HCI is in one of the excited hyperfine states of 3G3, the lowest hyperfine state F=12 can be prepared deterministically by driving appropriate microwave π-pulses between F states, followed by detection if the target F state has been reached. The mF substate is then prepared by driving ΔmF=±1 states using appropriately detuned Raman laser beams on the red sideband, followed by ground state cooling22,24.

Despite the high resolution of the measured lines, the 3P03G3 clock transition with expected nHz linewidth is only known to within 1.5 GHz. We can improve this by measuring the 3P05p4f3F2 and 3G35p4f3F2 transitions and performing a Ritz combination. The transitions can be found by employing again counter-propagating Raman beams that excite motion inversely proportional to the detuning of the Raman resonance to the electronic transition23. Using realistic laser parameters similar to above, tuned near the electronic resonance, we estimate that a scan with 10 MHz steps using 10 ms probe pulses can be performed without missing the transition. Assuming that each scan point requires 100 repetitions we can scan the ±2σ range in ~10 min. By reducing the Raman laser power while extending the probe time, the resolution can be enhanced to the sub-MHz level. Once identified, quantum-logic spectroscopy following1,22 on the clock transition can commence. Since the linewidth of the transition is significantly narrower compared to the currently best available lasers35, we expect laser-induced ac Stark shifts that need mitigation using hyper-Ramsey spectroscopy or a variant thereof3645.

Discussion

We have measured optical inter-configuration lines of Pr9+, finding the 5p4f orbital crossing, and thereby determined the frequency of the proposed 3P03G3 clock transition with an accuracy sufficient for quantum-logic spectroscopy at ultra-high resolution. Our state-of-the art calculations agree well with the measurements, thus we used the obtained wave functions to predict the polarizabilities of the levels and their sensitivities physics beyond the Standard Model. These are crucial steps towards future precision laser spectroscopy of the clock transition, for which we have also proposed a detailed experimental scheme.

Methods

Line-shape model

In the hyperfine Paschen-Back regime, the energy shift of a fine-structure state’s magnetic sublevel in an external magnetic field is given by

EPB=gJmJμBB+AHFSmImJ. 3

Hence, a transition between two fine-structure states has multiple components with energies Ec=E0+ΔEPB with E0 the transition energy without an external field, and ΔEPB=EPBEPB. Here, and in the following, primed symbols differentiate upper states from lower states. Taking into account the Gaussian shape of individual components, the line-shape function is defined as

f(E)=caΔmJM2exp(EEc)22w2, 4

where the sum is taken overall combinations of upper and lower magnetic sublevels. The factors aΔmJ take into account the known efficiencies of the setup for the two perpendicular linear polarizations of the light, and w is the common linewidth, which is determined by the apparatus response and Doppler broadening. The magnetic-dipole matrix elements M are given by

M=J,mJ,I,mIμJ,mJ,I,mIδI,IδmI,mIJ1JmJΔmJmJ.

The large parentheses denotes a Wigner 3j-symbol. It follows that ΔmJ=mJmJ=0,±1. In case of the asymmetric lines, the above J,mJ initial fine-structure states were transformed to the eigenstates of the Zeeman Hamiltonian also taking into account non-diagonal coupling.

Equation (4) was fitted to each measured line with the following free parameters: Ec, w, a constant baseline value (noise floor), and overall amplitude. The results for the extracted transition energies are presented in Table 2. The gJ values of all involved states were kept as global fit parameters for the whole dataset of 22 lines. Shot noise and read-out noise were taken into account for the weighting of the data points. The final uncertainties on the transition energies for each line were taken as the square root of its fit uncertainty and calibration uncertainty added in quadrature.

Fock-space coupled-cluster calculations

The Fock-space coupled-cluster (FSCC) calculations of the transition energies were performed within the framework of the projected Dirac-Coulomb-Breit Hamiltonian46. In atomic units (=me=e=1),

HDCB=ihD(i)+i<j1rij+Bij. 5

Here, hD is the one-electron Dirac Hamiltonian,

hD(i)=cαipi+(βi1)c2+Vnuc(i), 6

α and β are the four-dimensional Dirac matrices and rij=rirj. The nuclear potential Vnuc(i) takes into account the finite size of the nucleus, modeled by a uniformly charged sphere47. The two-electron term includes the nonrelativistic electron repulsion and the frequency-independent Breit operator,

Bij=12rijαiαj+(αirij)(αjrij)rij2, 7

and is correct to second order in the fine-structure constant α.

The calculations started from the closed-shell reference [Kr]4d105s2 configuration of Pr11+. In the first stage the relativistic Hartree-Fock equations were solved for this closed-shell reference state, which was subsequently correlated by solving the coupled-cluster equations. We then proceeded to add two electrons, one at at time, recorrelating at each stage, to reach the desired valence state of Pr9+. We were primarily interested in the 5p2 and the 5s4f configurations of Pr9+; however, to achieve optimal accuracy we used a large model space, comprised of 4 s, 5 p, 4 d, 5 f, 3 g, 2 h, and 1 i orbitals. The intermediate Hamiltonian method48 was employed to facilitate convergence.

The uncontracted universal basis set49 was used, composed of even-tempered Gaussian type orbitals, with exponents given by

ξn=γδ(n1),γ=106111395.371615δ=0.486752256286. 8

The basis set consisted of 37 s, 31 p, 26 d, 21 f, 16 g, 11 h, and 6 i functions; the convergence of the obtained transition energies with respect to the size of the basis set was verified. All the electrons were correlated.

The energy calculations were performed using the Tel-Aviv Relativistic Atomic Fock-Space coupled-cluster code (TRAFS-3C), written by E. Eliav, U. Kaldor and Y. Ishikawa. The final FSCC transition energies were also corrected for the QED contribution, calculated using the AMBiT program.

Polarizabilities

The polarizabilities were also calculated using the Fock-space coupled-cluster method within the finite-field approach50,51. We used the DIRAC17 program package52, as the Tel-Aviv program does not allow for addition of external fields. The v3z basis set of Dyall was used53; 20 electrons were correlated and the model space consisted of 5p and 4f orbitals. These calculations were carried out in the framework of the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian, as the Breit term is not yet implemented in the DIRAC program.

CI+MBPT calculations

Further calculations of energies and transition properties were obtained using the atomic code  AMBiT18. This code implements the particle-hole CI+MBPT formalism54, which builds on the combination of configuration interaction and many-body perturbation theory described in ref. 55 (see also ref. 56). This method also seeks to solve Eqs. (5)–(7), but treats electron correlations in a very different way. Full details may be found in ref. 18; below we present salient points for the case of Pr9+.

For the current calculations, we start from relativistic Hartree-Fock using the same closed-shell reference configuration used in the FSCC calculations: [Kr]4d105s2. We then create a B-spline basis set in this VN2 potential, including virtual orbitals up to n=30 and l=7. In the particle-hole CI+MBPT formalism the orbitals are divided into filled shells belonging to a frozen core, valence shells both below and above the Fermi level, and virtual orbitals.

The CI space includes single and double excitations from the 5p2, 5p4f, and 4f2 (“leading configurations”) up to 8spdf, including allowing for particle-hole excitations from the 4d and 5s shells. This gives an extremely large number of configuration state functions (CSFs) for each symmetry, for example the J=4 matrix has size N=798134. To make this problem tractable we use the emu CI method57 where the interactions between highly-excited configurations with holes are ignored.

Correlations with the frozen core orbitals (including 4s, 4p, 3d shells and those below) as well as the remaining virtual orbitals (n>8 or l>3) are treated using second-order MBPT by modifying the one and two-body radial matrix elements55. The effective three-body operator Σ(3) is applied to each matrix element separately; to reduce computational cost it is included only when at least one of the configurations involved is a leading configuration54. Finally, for the energy calculations we include an extrapolation to higher l in the MBPT basis10 and Lamb shift (QED) corrections5860.

Diagonalisation of the CI matrix gives energies and many-body wave functions for the low-lying levels in Pr9+. Using these wave functions we have calculated electromagnetic transition matrix elements (and hence transition rates), hyperfine structure, and matrix elements of T(2) (Eq. (2)). For all of these we have included the effects of core polarisation using the relativistic random-phase approximation (see ref. 61 for relevant formulas). By contrast q values (Eq. (1)) were obtained in the finite-field approach by directly varying α in the code and repeating the energy calculation. In Table 3, the predicted matrix elements and sensitivities are compared to those of other proposed systems and those already under investigation in relevant high-precision experiments.

Lifetime calculations

Direct decay of the 5p4f3G3 clock state to the ground state proceeds as an M3 transition, which is hugely suppressed and would indicate a lifetime of order 10 million years. However, the hyperfine components of the 141Pr clock state have a small admixture of J=2 levels, allowing for decay via a much faster E2 transition. The rate of the hyperfine-interaction-induced decay can be expressed as a generalized E2 transition

RHFSE2=115(ωα)5AHFSE222F+1 9

where F is the quantum number of total angular momentum of the upper state (F=I+J) and the amplitude can be expressed as

AHFSE2(ba)=naĥHFSnnQ(2)bEaEn+bĥHFSnnQ(2)aEbEn. 10

Here ĥHFS and Q(2) are the operators of the hyperfine dipole interaction and the electric quadrupole amplitude, respectively. For the clock transition the sum over intermediate states n in Eq. 10 is dominated by the lowest states with J=2: 5p4f3F2 and 5p23P2.

MCDF calculations

Transition energies, hyperfine structure coefficients, and g factors were also evaluated in the framework of the MCDF and relativistic CI methods, as implemented in the GRASP2K atomic structure package62, and were found to be in reasonable agreement with the experiment on the level of the CI+MBPT results. As a first step, an MCDF calculation was performed, with the active space of one- and two-electron exchanges ranging from the 5s, 5p, and 4f spectroscopic orbitals up to 8f. In the second step, the active space was extended to also include the 4d orbitals for a better account of core polarisation effects, and CI calculations were performed with the optimized orbitals obtained in the first step. The extension of the active space in the second step has lead to 946k jj-coupled configurations. For a more detailed modeling of the spectral line shapes, the non-diagonal matrix elements of the hyperfine and Zeeman interactions63 and mixing coefficients for sublevels of equal magnetic quantum numbers were also evaluated.

Acknowledgements

This work is part of and supported by the DFG Collaborative Research Centre SFB 1225 (ISOQUANT). J.C.B. was supported in this work by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the Australian Research Council (DP190100974). A.B. would like to thank the Center for Information Technology of the University of Groningen for providing access to the Peregrine high performance computing cluster and for their technical support. A.B. is grateful for the support of the UNSW Gordon Godfrey fellowship. P.O.S. acknowledges support from DFG, project SCHM2678/5-1, through SFB 1227 (DQ-mat), project B05, and the Cluster of Excellence EXC 2123 (QuantumFrontiers). We acknowledge funding through the Max Planck-RIKEN-PTB Center for Time, Constants and Fundamental Symmetries (TCFS).

Author contributions

J.C.B. and H.B. conceived this work, selected the targeted ion, and wrote the manuscript. H.B. performed the experiment using methods devised by J.R.C.L.U., and developed the Zeeman line fitting scheme. J.C.B. carried out AMBiT calculations, predicted the lifetimes of the clock transitions, and identified with J.R.C.L.U. the Zeeman-induced asymmetry. P.O.S. worked out the QLS scheme. A.B. performed FSCC and polarizability calculations; Z.H. carried out MCDF calculations and provided input for the asymmetric line modeling. All authors, including C.H.K. and T.P., contributed to the discussions of the results and manuscript.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The AMBiT code is available at https://github.com/drjuls/AMBiT18, the LOPT program at http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AEHM_v1_0.html20, the DIRAC17 package at http://www.diracprogram.org, and the GRASP2K code at https://www-amdis.iaea.org/GRASP2K/62. The TRAFS-3C code is available upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Mikhail Kozlov and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Rosenband T, et al. Frequency ratio of Al+ and Hg+ single-ion optical clocks; metrology at the 17th decimal place. Science. 2008;319:1808–1812. doi: 10.1126/science.1154622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chou CW, Hume DB, Koelemeij JCJ, Wineland DJ, Rosenband T. Frequency comparison of two high-accuracy Al+ optical clocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:070802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.070802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chou CW, Hume DB, Rosenband T, Wineland DJ. Optical clocks and relativity. Science. 2010;329:1630–1633. doi: 10.1126/science.1192720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huntemann N, Sanner C, Lipphardt B, Tamm C, Peik E. Single-ion atomic clock with 3×1018 systematic uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;116:063001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.063001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brewer SM, et al. 27Al+ quantum-logic clock with a systematic uncertainty below 27Al+ Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;123:033201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.033201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schiller S. Hydrogenlike highly charged ions for tests of the time independence of fundamental constants. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:180801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.180801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berengut JC, Dzuba VA, Flambaum VV. Enhanced laboratory sensitivity to variation of the fine-structure constant using highly charged ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;105:120801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.120801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berengut JC, Dzuba VA, Flambaum VV, Ong A. Highly charged ions with E1, E1, and E2 transitions within laser range. Phys. Rev. A. 2012;86:022517. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.022517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Safronova MS, et al. Highly charged ions for atomic clocks, quantum information, and search for α variation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;113:030801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.030801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Safronova MS, et al. Atomic properties of Cd-like and Sn-like ions for the development of frequency standards and search for the variation of the fine-structure constant. Phys. Rev. A. 2014;90:052509. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.052509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kozlov MG, Safronova MS, CrespoLópez-Urrutia JR, Schmidt PO. Highly charged ions: Optical clocks and applications in fundamental physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018;90:045005. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Windberger A, et al. Identification of the predicted 5s4f level crossing optical lines with applications to metrology and searches for the variation of fundamental constants. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:150801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.150801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murata S, Nakajima T, Safronova MS, Safronova UI, Nakamura N. Visible transitions in Ag-like and Cd-like lanthanide ions. Phys. Rev. A. 2017;96:062506. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.062506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nakajima T, et al. Visible spectra of highly charged holmium ions observed with a compact electron beam ion trap. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 2017;408:118–121. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.03.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.CrespoLópez-Urrutia JR, Dorn AD, Moshammer R, Ullrich J. The Freiburg electron beam ion trap/source project FreEBIT. Physica Scripta. 1999;1999:502. doi: 10.1238/Physica.Topical.080a00502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bekker H, et al. Laboratory precision measurements of optical emissions from coronal iron. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;98:062514. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.062514. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaldor, U. & Eliav, E. High-Accuracy Calculations for Heavy and Super-Heavy Elements, vol. 31 of Adv. Quantum Chem. (Academic Press, 1998).
  • 18.Kahl EV, Berengut JC. AMBiT: a program for high-precision relativistic atomic structure calculations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2019;238:232. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gu MF. The flexible atomic code. Can. J. Phys. 2008;86:675–689. doi: 10.1139/p07-197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kramida A. The program LOPT for least-squares optimization of energy levels. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2011;182:419–434. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.09.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tremblay P, et al. Absorption profiles of alkali-metal D lines in the presence of a static magnetic field. Phys. Rev. A. 1990;42:2766–2773. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.2766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schmidt PO, et al. Spectroscopy using quantum logic. Science. 2005;309:749–752. doi: 10.1126/science.1114375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wolf F, et al. Non-destructive state detection for quantum logic spectroscopy of molecular ions. Nature. 2016;530:457–460. doi: 10.1038/nature16513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chou C-W, et al. Preparation and coherent manipulation of pure quantum states of a single molecular ion. Nature. 2017;545:203–207. doi: 10.1038/nature22338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rosenband T, et al. Observation of the 1S03P0 clock transition in 1S03P0. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:220801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.220801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dzuba VA, Flambaum VV. Relativistic corrections to transition frequencies of Ag I, Dy I, Ho I, Yb II, Yb III, Au I, and Hg II and search for variation of the fine-structure constant. Phys. Rev. A. 2008;77:012515. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.012515. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kostelecký VA, Russell N. Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011;83:11. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hohensee MA, et al. Limits on violations of Lorentz symmetry and the Einstein equivalence principle using radio-frequency spectroscopy of atomic dysprosium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;111:050401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.050401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pruttivarasin T, et al. Michelson-Morley analogue for electrons using trapped ions to test Lorentz symmetry. Nature. 2015;517:592. doi: 10.1038/nature14091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shaniv R, et al. New methods for testing Lorentz invariance with atomic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:103202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.103202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schmöger L, et al. Coulomb crystallization of highly charged ions. Science. 2015;347:1233–1236. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Leopold T, et al. A cryogenic radio-frequency ion trap for quantum logic spectroscopy of highly charged ions. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2019;90:073201. doi: 10.1063/1.5100594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hume DB, et al. Trapped-ion state detection through coherent motion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:243902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.243902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wolf F, et al. Motional Fock states for quantum-enhanced amplitude and phase measurements with trapped ions. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2929. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10576-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Matei DG, et al. 1.5 μm Lasers with Sub-10 mHz Linewidth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118:263202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.263202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yudin VI, et al. Hyper-Ramsey spectroscopy of optical clock transitions. Phys. Rev. A. 2010;82:011804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.011804. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Huntemann N, et al. Generalized Ramsey excitation scheme with suppressed light shift. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:213002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.213002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zanon-Willette T, Yudin VI, Taichenachev AV. Generalized hyper-Ramsey resonance with separated oscillating fields. Phys. Rev. A. 2015;92:023416. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.023416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hobson R, et al. Modified hyper-Ramsey methods for the elimination of probe shifts in optical clocks. Phys. Rev. A. 2016;93:010501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.010501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zanon-Willette T, de Clercq E, Arimondo E. Probe light-shift elimination in generalized hyper-Ramsey quantum clocks. Phys. Rev. A. 2016;93:042506. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yudin VI, et al. Generalized autobalanced Ramsey spectroscopy of clock transitions. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2018;9:054034. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.054034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sanner C, Huntemann N, Lange R, Tamm C, Peik E. Autobalanced Ramsey spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:053602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.053602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Beloy K. Hyper-Ramsey spectroscopy with probe-laser-intensity fluctuations. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;97:031406. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.031406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yudin VI, et al. Combined error signal in Ramsey spectroscopy of clock transitions. N. J. Phys. 2018;20:123016. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/aaf47c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zanon-Willette T, et al. Composite laser-pulses spectroscopy for high-accuracy optical clocks: a review of recent progress and perspectives. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2018;81:094401. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aac9e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sucher J. Foundations of the relativistic theory of many-electron atoms. Phys. Rev. A. 1980;22:348–362. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.22.348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ishikawa Y, Baretty R, Binning R. Relativistic Gaussian basis set calculations on one-electron ions with a nucleus of finite extent. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985;121:130. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(85)87169-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Eliav E, Vilkas MJ, Ishikawa Y, Kaldor U. Extrapolated intermediate Hamiltonian coupled-cluster approach: theory and pilot application to electron affinities of alkali atoms. J. Chem. Phys. 2005;122:224113. doi: 10.1063/1.1929727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Malli GL, DaSilva ABF, Ishikawa Y. Universal Gaussian basis set for accurate ab initio relativistic Dirac-Fock calculations. Phys. Rev. A. 1993;47:143–146. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cohen HD. Electric-dipole polarizability of atoms by the Hartree-Fock method. ii. the isoelectronic two- and four-electron series. J. Chem. Phys. 1965;43:3558–3562. doi: 10.1063/1.1696518. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Monkhorst HJ. Calculation of properties with the coupled-cluster method. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 1977;12:421–432. doi: 10.1002/qua.560120850. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Visscher, L. et al. DIRAC, a relativistic ab initio electronic structure program, Release DIRAC17.http://www.diracprogram.org (2017).
  • 53.Gomes ASP, Dyall KG, Visscher L. Relativistic double-zeta, triple-zeta, and quadruple-zeta basis sets for the lanthanides La-Lu. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2010;127:369–381. doi: 10.1007/s00214-009-0725-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Berengut JC. Particle-hole configuration interaction and many-body perturbation theory: application to Hg+ Phys. Rev. A. 2016;94:012502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dzuba VA, Flambaum VV, Kozlov MG. Combination of the many-body perturbation theory with the configuration-interaction method. Phys. Rev. A. 1996;54:3948. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Berengut JC, Flambaum VV, Kozlov MG. Calculation of isotope shifts and relativistic shifts in C I, C II, C III, and C IV. Phys. Rev. A. 2006;73:012504. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Geddes AJ, Czapski DA, Kahl EV, Berengut JC. Saturated-configuration-interaction calculations for five-valent Ta and Db. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;98:042508. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.042508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Flambaum VV, Ginges JSM. Radiative potential and calculations of QED radiative corrections to energy levels and electromagnetic amplitudes in many-electron atoms. Phys. Rev. A. 2005;72:052115. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ginges JSM, Berengut JC. QED radiative corrections and many-body effects in atoms: vacuum polarization and binding energy shifts in alkali metals. J. Phys. B. 2016;49:095001. doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/49/9/095001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ginges JSM, Berengut JC. Atomic many-body effects and Lamb shifts in alkali metals. Phys. Rev. A. 2016;93:052509. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.052509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dzuba VA, Berengut JC, Ginges JSM, Flambaum VV. Screening of an oscillating external electric field in atoms. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;98:043411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.043411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jönsson P, Gaigalas G, Bieron J, Fischer CF, Grant I. New version: GRASP2K relativistic atomic structure package. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2013;184:2197–2203. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.02.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Andersson M, Jönsson P. HFSZEEMAN—a program for computing weak and intermediate field fine and hyperfine structure Zeeman splittings from MCDHF wave functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2008;178:156–170. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2007.07.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dzuba VA, et al. Strongly enhanced effects of Lorentz symmetry violation in entangled Yb+ ions. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:465. doi: 10.1038/nphys3610. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Flambaum VV, Dzuba VA. Search for variation of the fundamental constants in atomic, molecular, and nuclear spectra. Can. J. Phys. 2009;87:25–33. doi: 10.1139/p08-072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The AMBiT code is available at https://github.com/drjuls/AMBiT18, the LOPT program at http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AEHM_v1_0.html20, the DIRAC17 package at http://www.diracprogram.org, and the GRASP2K code at https://www-amdis.iaea.org/GRASP2K/62. The TRAFS-3C code is available upon reasonable request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES