Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2018 Mar 23;5(6):2287–2294. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00121

Planar Double-Epsilon-Near-Zero Cavities for Spontaneous Emission and Purcell Effect Enhancement

Vincenzo Caligiuri †,*, Milan Palei †,§, Muhammad Imran †,§, Liberato Manna †, Roman Krahne †,*
PMCID: PMC6906952  PMID: 31867410

Abstract

graphic file with name ph8b00121_0006.jpg

The enhancement of the photophysical response of fluorophores is a crucial factor for photonic and optoelectronic technologies that involve fluorophores as gain media. Recent advances in the development of an extreme light propagation regime, called epsilon-near-zero (ENZ), provide a promising approach in this respect. In this work, we design metal/dielectric nanocavities to be resonant with the absorption and emission bands of the employed fluorophores. Using CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystal films as light emitters, we study the spontaneous emission and decay rate enhancement induced by a specifically tailored double-epsilon-near-zero (double ENZ) structure. We experimentally demonstrate the existence of two ENZ wavelengths, by directly measuring their dielectric permittivity via ellipsometric analysis. The double ENZ nature of this plasmonic nanocavity has been exploited to achieve both surface plasmon enhanced absorption (SPEA) and surface plasmon coupled emission (SPCE), inducing a significant enhancement of both the spontaneous emission and the decay rate of the perovskite nanocrystal film that is placed on top of the nanocavity. Finally, we discuss the possibility of tailoring the two ENZ wavelengths of this structure within the visible spectrum simply by finely designing the thickness of the two dielectric layers, which enables resonance matching with a broad variety of dyes. Our device design is appealing for many practical applications, ranging from sensing to low threshold amplified spontaneous emission, since we achieve a strong PL enhancement with structures that allow for straightforward fluorophore deposition on a planar surface that keeps the fluorophores exposed and accessible.

Keywords: Epsilon near zero, spontaneous emission, hyperbolic metamaterials, surface plasmon coupled emission, surface plasmon enhanced absorption, CsPbBr3 perovskite

Enhancing the spontaneous emission of a fluorophore is of great interest for a plethora of new emerging technologies, such as optical biosensing,1 low-threshold lasers,2,3 and single photon sources.4−6 In order to achieve such an enhancement, many approaches have been proposed, most of which utilize an optical cavity to enhance the spontaneous emission rate of a fluorophore, which is positioned either inside or in proximity of it. Such an effect is known as the Purcell effect.7−9 One of the most interesting ways to enhance the Purcell effect is to exploit a special propagation regime involving nanometrically confined evanescent waves rising from the plasmonic properties of very thin metallic films.10−14 Generally, there are two mechanisms that govern such a phenomenon: surface plasmon enhanced absorption (SPEA);15,16 and surface plasmon coupled emission (SPCE).17−20 The former is inherent to the enhancement of the absorbance of the fluorophore by means of a plasmonic absorber, while the latter refers to the possibility of improving its emission by exploiting the resonant properties of a plasmonic structure that acts as a cavity. Enhancement of the emission rate and photoluminescence (PL) by several orders of magnitude has been achieved by using specifically designed nanoresonators that embed the fluorophore inside the plasmonic cavity. However, these approaches typically have two drawbacks: (i) the fabrication of such structures is very demanding and (ii) to obtain such record values, the fluorophore has to be inserted at the position of the highest field enhancement, which extends only along a few nanometers. This spatial extent might not be compatible with the size of target biomolecules, and the target molecule might not be exposed to the surface. In this respect, planar plasmonic multilayers could be a very interesting alternative. It has been demonstrated that a planar structure of metallic and dielectric multilayers can behave as an absorber (and as a resonant cavity) if its dielectric permittivity vanishes at a precise wavelength, manifesting a condition known as epsilon-near-zero (ENZ).21−28 In this paper, we show how to take advantage of both the SPEA and SPCE effects utilizing a plasmonic system, whose dielectric permittivity has been specifically designed to manifest a double-epsilon-near-zero (double ENZ) behavior. The first ENZ condition, which occurs at shorter wavelengths, is tuned to match the absorbance band of the fluorophore positioned at the top, thus inducing the enhanced absorption properties. The second ENZ wavelength is tuned on the emission peak of the fluorophore, acting as a resonator to reach the plasmon coupled enhancement of the emission. As a fluorophore, we chose cesium lead halide perovskite (CsPbBr3) nanocrystals that emit in the green spectral region.29 These nanocrystals are a particularly appealing material system to use as emitters for our approach, since their emission and absorption properties can be tuned across the entire visible spectrum both by chemical composition (through anion exchange) and by quantum confinement.29−34 Furthermore, perovskite emitters manifest excellent optical properties such as high quantum yields that almost reach unity, narrow emission line widths, and negligible influence of self-absorption and Förster resonance energy transfer.35

We demonstrate that, by exploiting the SPEA and SPCE effects, the spontaneous emission of the perovskite nanocrystal layer is enhanced by a factor of 4 with respect to the emission from a layer on the bare dielectric substrate. In order to highlight the contribution of both ENZ conditions, we present a comparison with a plasmonic structure that manifests only one ENZ regime in the absorption band of the fluorophore. For such a system, only the SPEA effect is present, which enables us to clearly separate the SPEA and SPCE contributions from the fluorophore emission. In the case of the single ENZ, we observe a small increase in the emission (by about a factor of 1.5) and only a slightly reduced decay time, while a 4-fold enhancement of the emission, accompanied by a significantly shortened decay time is observed for the double ENZ one. We demonstrate experimentally and theoretically that tuning the thickness of the dielectric surface spacer layer to some tens of nanometers maximizes the PL enhancement and quantum yield. Finally, we show how, by simply acting on the thickness of each single dielectric layer, the two ENZ wavelengths can be tuned within the whole visible range, which makes the proposed structure a widely versatile planar plasmonic platform for the enhancement of the spontaneous emission and decay rate of a broad variety of fluorophores.

Recently, ENZ behavior has been demonstrated in metal/dielectric multilayers known as hyperbolic metamaterials, which consist of a large number of periodically stacked subwavelength metal (M)/insulator (I) pairs.36−50 Usually, the design of the ENZ wavelength in these systems is carried out in the framework of the effective medium theory (EMT). Although the EMT is found to be useful for a high number of layers, it fails to predict the salient features that occur in plasmonic systems made of a low number (1, 2, 3, etc.) of metal/insulator cavities (see Supporting Information), as is the case for the MIM and MIMIM structures discussed here and illustrated in Figure 1a,b.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Sketches of the (a) single ENZ (MIM) and (b) double ENZ (MIMIM) structures. A 50 nm thin Al2O3 layer has been deposited on top of each structure as a spacer between the dye (CsPbBr3 nanocrystals) and the Ag layer.

Figure 1b shows the double ENZ system, which consists of a double metal/insulator (MIMIM) plasmonic cavity, in comparison with a single ENZ (MIM) one (Figure 1a). Ag has been chosen as the metal due to its excellent plasmonic properties and low losses in the band of interest (with a wavelength of about 500 nm), while Al2O3 has been used as a dielectric due to both its suitable refractive index and high transparency in the visible range. Scattering matrix method calculations allowed the thickness of the layers that were optimized to 20 nm for Ag and 80 nm for Al2O3 to be precisely designed. An exhaustive description of the propagation of the light inside MIM and MIMIM structures has been given by Meier51 and by Avrutsky et al.52 The MIMIM double cavity system supports four modes, where only two with symmetrical field distribution persist.52 These modes are denominated gap plasmon polaritons (GPP) and are extremely confined inside the structure. When the number of adjacent nanocavities (intended as the number of dielectric layers sandwiched between two silver ones) increases, a mutual repulsion of these modal indices occurs. This interaction between these cavity plasmon modes induces their hybridization,53−55 giving rise to strongly confined bulk modes called bulk plasmon polaritons (BPPs).52

Figure 2a,b shows the p-polarized reflectance (R) and transmittance (T), which are measured with an ellipsometer at a grazing angle of 40° for the MIM and MIMIM nanocavities. The absorbance (A) was then calculated by A = 1 – (T + R). As expected, a maximum in absorbance is detected very close to the dip in reflection for the MIM structure (see Figure 2a), which corresponds to the BPP mode at 425 nm. For the MIMIM system, as predicted, two BPP modes are observed as maxima in absorbance, the first one at 373 nm and the second one at 510 nm. Both the MIM and MIMIM structures manifest a peak in absorbance at λ = 327 nm due to the well-known Ferrel–Berreman mode. The Ferrel–Berreman mode represents a particular case of very low-loss BPP resonance, whose ENZ nature has been extensively investigated theoretically.56,57 Even though the SPEA process does not take the contribution of the Ferrel–Berreman mode into account, its presence is crucial for validating our experimental investigations. As previously mentioned, the optical constants of metal/dielectric multilayers are usually approximated in the framework of the EMT. For structures with only a small number of layers (like in our case), this method does not yield zero crossings in the effective permittivity dispersions at the frequencies of the BPPs; therefore it completely neglects their occurrence, as we show in detail in Figure S3 and the related discussion in the Supporting Information. Consequently, a direct measurement of the dielectric permittivities of both the MIM and MIMIM system is required. For this purpose, ellipsometry is a powerful tool, and Figure 2c,d shows the ellipsometrically measured real and imaginary dielectric permittivities of the MIM and MIMIM multilayers, respectively. The ellipsometric investigation (see details in Figure S1 and the related discussion in the SI) of the optical response of the MIM and MIMIM structures allows for the homogenization of their dielectric permittivities, that is, the optical properties of the plasmonic multilayer structures can be fully described by a homogenized permittivity function. This approach elucidates the ENZ nature of the BPPs originating from the plasmonic multilayers and is corroborated by accurately reproducing the experimental transmission and reflection spectra (see Figure S2 in the SI). Ellipsometric measurements confirm that the Ferrel–Berreman mode occurs in both the structures at about 327 nm, highlighting its low loss ENZ nature. For the MIM structure, one other low-loss ENZ wavelength is detected at λ = 425 nm, the BPP1 that corresponds to a maximum in absorbance. For the MIMIM structure, two low-loss ENZ modes are detected, in addition to the Ferrel–Berreman mode, and these BPP1 and BPP2 modes are found at 373 and 510 nm, respectively, which correspond precisely to the two peaks measured in absorbance. In order to confirm the plasmonic nature and the nanometric confinement of the electric field inside the dielectric layers that are sandwiched between the silver ones, finite element method based simulations have been performed by using COMSOL Multiphysics. Figure 3a shows a comparison between the experimentally derived absorbance and the COMSOL simulation (red curve), calculated by integrating the electric field inside the two dielectric layers. The very good agreement in spectral position and amplitude between the experiments and the simulations confirms the ENZ nature of the two absorbance peaks. The difference in the full-widths at half-maximum (fwhm) can be ascribed to spectral broadening in the experimental case caused by nonideal film thickness and morphology. Figure 3b,c shows the electric field inside and around the MIMIM multilayer, which was induced by illumination at an angle of 40° incidence for wavelengths at 384 and 510 nm (the ENZ wavelengths). Clearly, the electric field is strongly enhanced in the dielectric layers of the MIMIM structure at the BPP frequencies, which is due to the ENZ condition. Although the BPPs are excited with impinging light at an oblique angle (40°), the wave vector k inside the dielectric layers of the cavity is close to zero as expected by the dispersion relation of k(εeff). This also affects the wave fronts that are almost parallel to the layers in the plasmonic cavity. To give more insight into this phenomenon, we plot the dependence of the BPP frequencies on the angle of incidence in Figure S4. We note that the simulated absorbance peak is found at 384 nm, slightly red-shifted with respect to the experimental one at 373 nm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a,b) Transmittance (blue), reflectance (green), and absorbance (red) of (a) the MIM and (b) MIMIM systems. (c,d) Ellipsometrically measured real (black) and imaginary (orange) parts of the dielectric permittivity of the MIM (c) and MIMIM (d) structures.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Experimentally measured absorbance (black) of the MIMIM structure and the corresponding COMSOL simulation (red). The field propagation profile is simulated at the two ENZ wavelengths that were found based on the COMSOL simulation: (b) 384 nm and (c) 510 nm. In both cases, the electric field remained strongly confined in the dielectric layers.

Recently, it has been demonstrated that the weak coupling based interaction between a fluorophore and an adjacent plasmonic absorber induces the SPEA phenomenon.17 Moreover, the possibility of reaching an extremely high photonic density of states (PDOS) in the proximity of the ENZ wavelength has been extensively demonstrated.26,58,59 The hyperbolic (or indefinite) isofrequency surfaces that appear in the ENZ regimes allow wave vectors up to infinitely high values to propagate inside the metamaterial, which are usually known as “high-k modes”.37,39,47,60,61 This effect results in an extremely high PDOS at the ENZ frequency. Due to the high PDOS, a fluorophore in the proximity of an ENZ medium experiences a high Purcell effect, and as a consequence, its decay time is strongly reduced.37,39,40,44 Eventually, such a high PDOS can lead to the enhancement of the spontaneous emission of a fluorophore, an effect known as SPCE. The MIMIM plasmonic multilayer allows us to take advantage of both the SPEA and SPCE effects at the same time, thanks to its double ENZ resonating nature. In order to evaluate the SPEA and SPCE contributions to the PL and decay time, we compare the results of the MIMIM and MIM structures. Due to its single ENZ behavior, the MIM system can solely exploit one resonance effect, which in the case of CsPbBr3 nanocubes as a dye is the SPEA. For CsPbBr3 nanocubes, the absorption band falls within both the single plasmon band of the MIM system and the first plasmon band of the MIMIM structure, and their emission matches the second ENZ wavelength of the MIMIM system.

Figure 4a shows the absorption and emission of the CsPbBr3 nanocubes together with the absorption bands of the MIM and MIMIM structures, which confirms the aforementioned overlap. The size and shape of the CsPbBr3 nanocubes are evident in the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image displayed in Figure 4b, and scanning electron microscopy images of the nanocrystal films are shown in Figure S5.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Normalized absorption (blue line) and emission (green line) spectra of the CsPbBr3 nanocubes are plotted together with the normalized absorbance of the MIM (dashed black curve) and MIMIM (dash-dot black curve) structures. (b) TEM images of the CsPbBr3 nanocubes that have an average edge length of 9.5 ± 1 nm. (c) Spontaneous emission and (d) decay times of CsPbBr3 nanocubes deposited on a bare Al2O3 substrate (black), a MIM (red), and a MIMIM (blue) structure. The inset in panel c shows the experimental PL intensity versus the thickness of the dielectric layer at the surface, together with the results obtained for the electric field with finite element simulations (COMSOL).

The position of the fluorophore with respect to the plasmonic cavity is crucial to the emission enhancement. One of the best ways to maximize their interaction is to embed the fluorophore inside the plasmonic cavity.62,63 However, this requires technologically challenging processes in order to prevent the fluorophore’s degradation and to simultaneously ensure a suitable spacing from the plasmonic metallic elements. A more facile approach consists of placing the fluorophore outside the cavity. In this case, the distance to the cavity determines the emission properties. In our experiments, we use an alumina layer as a spacer between the MIMIM cavity and the nanocrystal emitter layer, and we investigate the PL enhancement while tuning the spacer’s thickness from 5 to 100 nm. We find a maximum in PL for a layer thickness of 50 nm, as shown in the inset in Figure 4c. Since the dielectric spacer layer is made of the same material as the dielectric layers in the MIMIM structure (forming a MIMIMI multilayer), it strongly influences the electric field distribution. Finite element simulations using COMSOL show that the electric field is maximized for a spacer layer of 50 nm, which is in excellent agreement with our experimental data. A spacer layer with a thickness of 50 nm also strongly contributes to minimizing the losses in PL induced by the metallic layers in the MIMIM structure. It should be noted that the spacing of the fluorophores to the metallic cavity can be easily controlled, and our planar structure with the emitter layer on the surface ensures facile fluorophore deposition and accessibility. Further results that we obtained with a spacer layer thickness of 5 nm are reported in the SI in Figure S6.

The PL spectra of the CsPbBr3 nanocubes are reported in Figure 4c for the three different cases, with the CsPbBr3 nanocube film being on top of (i) a simple 80 nm Al2O3 layer, (ii) the MIM covered with a 50 nm thick Al2O3 spacer layer, and (iii) the MIMIM structure covered with a 50 nm thick Al2O3 spacer layer (see the SI for data with a 5 nm thick spacer layer). A small increase in the PL is found in the MIM system, which can be attributed to the SPEA effect. For the MIMIM multilayer, the PL experiences a noticeable 4-fold enhancement, indicating that both SPEA and SPCE take place. The time correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) measurements displayed in Figure 4d allow the spontaneous decay rate to be accessed, and the fitting results for the lifetimes with a three-exponential decay are reported in Table 1.

Table 1. Lifetimes for the Three Systems Consisting of Simple Al2O3 and MIM and MIMIM Structures with a 50 nm thick Al2O3 Layer on the Top Obtained from Fitting the Decay Traces with a Three-Exponential Functiona.

  τ1 τ2 τ3 τAVG QY Γrad Γnonrad
  (ns) (ns) (ns) (ns) (%) (μs–1) (μs–1)
Al2O3 2.14 5.74 23.26 9.77 50 51.16 51.16
MIM 1.27 4.23 20.5 6.32 35 55.33 102.76
MIMIM 1.34 3.58 15.67 4.59 75 163.09 54.36
Open in a new tab
a

The resulting decay time components τ1, τ2, and τ3, the average lifetimes, and the measured quantum yields (QYs) are reported, as well as the calculated average radiative and non-radiative decay rates that were obtained using eqs 1 and 2.

In the proximity of the MIM structure, the lifetimes are shorter than those of the bare Al2O3. It is noteworthy that the MIM structure in this spectral range is extremely reflective, manifesting a strong metallic behavior. This is well-known to occur in MIM structures above the ENZ wavelength since they start approaching the features of a so-called type II anisotropy, which is typical of a hyperbolic metamaterial in the hyperbolic region.37,39,40,44 This increases the PDOS, which, in turn, enhances the spontaneous decay rate.37−41,44,45,60,61 Comparing the MIM and MIMIM structures, we find that their fastest lifetime components τ1 are very similar (their difference of 70 ps is below the time resolution of our setup), while we observe significantly reduced lifetime components τ2 and τ3 in the MIMIM system. We assign this reduction in lifetime to the increased PDOS, which is provided by the SPCE effect, that is, by the coupling of the spontaneous emission with the ENZ regime of the MIMIM system at a wavelength of 510 nm.

We have measured the quantum yield (QY) obtained from the perovskite film on the Al2O3, MIM, and MIMIM substrates, taking the absorbance of each noncoated substrate into account. We obtained a QY of 50% from the perovskite film on Al2O3, 35% QY on the MIM, and a high QY of at least 75% on the MIMIM, as reported in Table 1. The decrease in QY from the Al2O3 to the MIM confirms the low efficiency of the SPEA effect, which is still able to provide a slight increase in the PL, but at the cost of a much higher absorption. The strong increase to a QY of 75% or higher for the MIMIM structure can be attributed to the plasmonic enhancement by the SPCE process, highlighting the much better performance of the double ENZ configuration with respect to the single ENZ one. With the QY and average lifetime values, we can calculate the average radiative and nonradiative decay rates, using the following two equations:64,65

graphic file with name ph8b00121_m001.jpg 1
graphic file with name ph8b00121_m002.jpg 2

in which τavg is the average lifetime, and Γrad and Γnonrad are the average radiative and nonradiative decay rates, respectively. We obtain a strongly enhanced radiative decay rate for the MIMIM structure and an enhanced nonradiative decay in the MIM system that reflects the losses due to the vicinity of the metallic layers. Since the PL and QY are strongly enhanced in the MIMIM structure, we can conclude that the double ENZ condition leads to an enhanced PDOS that acts on the radiative decay of the nanocrystals, manifesting the Purcell effect.

One interesting aspect of the MIMIM double ENZ system is that the separation between the two absorbance peaks can be tuned by carefully designing the thickness of the two dielectric layers in the cavity. With the aim of demonstrating this concept, we calculated, by means of the scattering matrix method, the absorbance spectra of the MIMIM structure while varying the thickness of the top and bottom dielectric layer separately, while the other one remained fixed at 80 nm. In both the cases, as illustrated in Figure 5a,c, a noticeable red shift in the higher wavelength absorbance peak is found, which can be tuned throughout the visible range (see also Figure 5b,d, which shows the shift of the first and second absorbance peak in the two configurations). The possibility of tailoring the two ENZ wavelengths in the visible range makes the MIMIM system extremely flexible and suitable for coupling with a large range of emitter materials, from organic dyes to inorganic nanocrystals.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Absorbance spectra obtained by scattering matrix method calculations. The thickness of the top (a) and the bottom (c) dielectric layer in the MIMIM structure was varied. (b,d) Center wavelength of the low (red dots) and high (black squares) energy absorbance peaks that shift as a function thickness of the top (b) and bottom (d) dielectric layer. The spectral distance between the two absorbance peaks can be tuned across the full visible range.

In conclusion, we demonstrated the possibility of exploiting the dual resonant nature of a specifically designed double ENZ MIMIM multilayer in order to enhance both the absorbance and the photoluminescence together with the decay rate of a film of CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals deposited on top of the layer structure. Thanks to the special plasmonic features of the MIMIM system, two ENZ wavelengths at 373 and 510 nm, which represent the BPP modes of this structure, could be theoretically designed and experimentally measured by means of spectroscopic ellipsometry. In the MIMIM system, the PDOS is greatly enhanced in the absorption and emission bands of the dye, and therefore both SPEA and SPCE phenomena take place. This leads to a noticeable enhancement of the spontaneously emitted photons and of their decay rates from a fluorophore layer at the surface, with respect to the MIM system, in which only the SPEA effect is present. We demonstrate the possibility of enhancing the Purcell effect without metallic grating couplers and sophisticated lithography processes. The double ENZ MIMIM multilayer shows wide design flexibility, since the two ENZ wavelengths can be tuned across the whole visible range, making it compatible with all large variety dyes. The system we propose here represents a versatile platform for engineering the PL and decay rate enhancement of a desired fluorophore and allows for the facile design and fabrication of the plasmonic cavity as well as for the deposition of the fluorophores. Furthermore, the ease of fabrication is suitable for large surfaces and is compatible with requirements for biomedical sensing and low threshold lasers.

Materials and Methods

Ag and Al2O3 multilayers have been fabricated by means of electron-beam evaporation. The thickness and evaporation rates have been checked in situ with a quartz balance. The optical constants and thickness of the Ag and Al2O3 single layers, as well as those of the MIM and MIMIM structures, were obtained by spectroscopic ellipsometry and carried out by a V-VASE ellipsometer (Woollam). Reflectance (R) and transmittance (T) spectra were ellipsometrically measured, while the absorbance (A) of the MIM and MIMIM structures was calculated with the relation A = 1 – (T + R) by using the measured transmittance and reflectance data. Such an approach gives precise results for multilayers of smooth films. PL and TCSPC measures were obtained with an Edinburgh Instruments spectrophotometer. Finite element method based simulations were performed with the commercial software COMSOL Multiphysics. Simulations are full field, and a monochromatic plane wave impinging at an angle of 40° was used as an excitation source.

CsPbBr3 nanocrystals were synthesized by following the procedure of Protesescu et al. with some minor modifications.29 Lead(II) bromide (PbBr2, 99.999% trace metals basis), cesium carbonate (Cs2CO3, reagentPlus, 99%), octadecene (ODE, technical grade, 90%), oleylamine (OLAM, 90%), oleic acid (OA, 90%), ethyl acetate (90%), and toluene (TOL, anhydrous, 99.8%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. PbBr2 (0.3 mmol) and 10 mL of octadecene (ODE) were loaded into a 25 mL 3-neck flask and dried under vacuum for 30 min at 120 °C. Degassed OA (oleic acid, 0.8 mL) and OLAM (oleylamine, 0.8 mL) were injected under nitrogen flow. After the complete dissolution of the PbBr2, the temperature was raised to 170 °C, and 0.6 mL of previously synthesized Cs-oleate (0.125 M in ODE) was swiftly injected. Immediately after the injection, the NC solution was quickly cooled down to room temperature with an ice water bath, and the NCs were collected via high-speed centrifugation (at 12000 rpm for 10 min), followed by redispersion in 3 mL of toluene. The purification process was repeated again by adding 1 mL of ethyl acetate, and finally, the NCs were dispersed into 2 mL of toluene. The deposition of CsPbBr3 NCs was carried out by spin-coating at 2000 rpm for 60 s. SEM analysis, which is reported in the Supporting Information (see Figure S3), confirms the good homogeneity of the deposited films.

PL QY measurements were performed on the NC films deposited on the different substrates using a calibrated integrating sphere.

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union seventh Framework Programme under Grant Agreement No. 614897 (ERC Consolidator Grant “TRANS-NANO”) and from Horizon 2020 under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement COMPASS No. 691185.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00121.

  • Details on ellipsometry analysis, a comparison between effective medium theory and experimental effective dielectric permittivity, SEM analysis of NC films, influence of incident angle of impinging light on the BPP frequency, and details on the fitting of PL decay traces (PDF)

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written with contributions from all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ph8b00121_si_001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

References

  1. Rosi N. L.; Mirkin C. A. Nanostructures in Biodiagnostics. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1547–1562. 10.1021/cr030067f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Noginov M.; Zhu G.; Belgrave A.; Bakker R.; et al. Demonstration of a Spaser-Based Nanolaser. Nature 2009, 460, 1110–1112. 10.1038/nature08318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang Q.; Li G.; Liu X.; Qian F.; Li Y.; Sum T. C.; Lieber C. M.; Xiong Q. A Room Temperature Low-Threshold Ultraviolet Plasmonic Nanolaser. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4953–4962. 10.1038/ncomms5953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jeantet A.; Chassagneux Y.; Raynaud C.; Roussignol P.; Lauret J. S.; Besga B.; Estève J.; Reichel J.; Voisin C. Widely Tunable Single-Photon Source from a Carbon Nanotube in the Purcell Regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 247402. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.247402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Claudon J.; Bazin M.; Gregersen N.; Sauvan C.; Lalanne P.; Gérard J.; et al. A Highly Efficient Single-Photon Source Based on a Quantum Dot in a Photonic Nanowire. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 174–177. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.287. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Somaschi N.; Giesz V.; De Santis L.; Loredo J. C.; Almeida M. P.; Hornecker G.; Portalupi S. L.; Grange T.; Antón C.; Demory J.; et al. Near-Optimal Single-Photon Sources in the Solid State. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 340–345. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacob Z.; Smolyaninov I. I.; Narimanov E. E. Broadband Purcell Effect: Radiative Decay Engineering with Metamaterials Broadband Purcell Effect: Radiative Decay Engineering with Metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 181105–181109. 10.1063/1.4710548. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Badolato A.; Hennessy K.; Atature M.; Dreiser J.; Hu E.; Petroff P. M.; Imamoglu A. Deterministic Coupling of Single Quantum Dots to Single Nanocavity Modes. Science 2005, 308, 1158–1161. 10.1126/science.1109815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu S.; Xu X.; Majumdar A.; et al. Monolayer Semiconductor Nanocavity Lasers with Ultralow thresholds. Nature 2015, 520, 69–72. 10.1038/nature14290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Russell K. J.; Liu T.-L.; Cui S.; Hu E. L. Large Spontaneous Emission Enhancement in Plasmonic Nanocavities. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 459–462. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lakowicz J. R. Radiative Decay Engineering 3. Surface Plasmon-Coupled Directional Emission. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 324, 153–169. 10.1016/j.ab.2003.09.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Iorsh I.; Poddubny A.; Orlov A.; Belov P.; Kivshar Y. S. Spontaneous Emission Enhancement in Metal-Dielectric Metamaterials. Phys. Lett. A 2012, 376, 185–187. 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li J.-F.; Li C.-Y.; Aroca R. F. Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3962–3979. 10.1039/C7CS00169J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li L.; Wang W.; Luk T. S.; Yang X.; Gao J. Enhanced Quantum Dot Spontaneous Emission with Multilayer Metamaterial Nanostructures. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 501–508. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b01039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nikitin A. Y.; Guinea F.; Garcia-Vidal F. J.; Martin-Moreno L. Surface Plasmon Enhanced Absorption and Suppressed Transmission in Periodic Arrays of Graphene Ribbons. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2012, 85, 081405. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.081405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jin Y.; Feng J.; Zhang X. L.; Xu M.; Bi Y. G.; Chen Q. D.; Wang H. Y.; Sun H. B. Surface-Plasmon Enhanced Absorption in Organic Solar Cells by Employing a Periodically Corrugated Metallic Electrode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 163303–163308. 10.1063/1.4761947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang Y.; Wang H. Y.; Wang H.; Gao B. R.; Hao Y. W.; Jin Y.; Chen Q. D.; Sun H. B. Surface Plasmon Enhanced Fluorescence of Dye Molecules on Metal Grating Films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 12636–12642. 10.1021/jp203530e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gryczynski I.; Malicka J.; Gryczynski Z.; Lakowicz J. R. Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission with Gold Films. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 12568–12574. 10.1021/jp040221h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bauch M.; Toma K.; Toma M.; Zhang Q.; Dostalek J. Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence Biosensors: A Review. Plasmonics 2014, 9, 781–799. 10.1007/s11468-013-9660-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hsu L.; Ding W.; Schatz G. C. Plasmon-Coupled Resonance Energy Transfer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 2357–2367. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Alù A.; Silveirinha M. G.; Salandrino A.; Engheta N. Epsilon-near-Zero Metamaterials and Electromagnetic Sources: Tailoring the Radiation Phase Pattern. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2007, 75, 155410. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu R.; Cheng Q.; Hand T.; Mock J. J.; Cummer S. A.; Smith D. R.; Cui T. J. Experimental Demonstration of Electromagnetic Tunneling Through an Epsilon-Near-Zero Metamaterial at Microwave Frequencies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 023903. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.023903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Edwards B.; Alù A.; Young M. E.; Silveirinha M. G.; Engheta N. Experimental Verification of Epsilon-Near-Zero Metamaterial Coupling and Energy Squeezing Using a Microwave Waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 033903. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.033903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Maas R.; Parsons J.; Engheta N.; Polman A. Metamaterial at Visible Wavelengths. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 907–912. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pollard R. J.; Murphy A.; Hendren W. R.; Evans P. R.; Atkinson R.; Wurtz G. A.; Zayats A. V.; Podolskiy V. A. Optical Nonlocalities and Additional Waves in Epsilon-Near-Zero Metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 127405. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.127405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Engheta N. Pursuing Near-Zero Response. Science 2013, 340, 286–288. 10.1126/science.1235589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Silveirinha M. G.; Engheta N. Theory of Supercoupling, Squeezing Wave Energy, and Field Confinement in Narrow Channels and Tight Bends Using ε near-Zero Metamaterials. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2007, 76, 245109. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.245109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Caspani L.; Kaipurath R. P. M.; Clerici M.; Ferrera M.; Roger T.; Kim J.; Kinsey N.; Pietrzyk M.; Di Falco A.; Shalaev V. M.; et al. Enhanced Nonlinear Refractive Index in ϵ -Near-Zero Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 233901. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.233901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Protesescu L.; Yakunin S.; Bodnarchuk M. I.; Krieg F.; Caputo R.; Hendon C. H.; Yang R. X.; Walsh A.; Kovalenko M. V. Nanocrystals of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel Optoelectronic Materials Showing Bright Emission with Wide Color Gamut. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3692–3696. 10.1021/nl5048779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Akkerman Q. A.; Motti S. G.; Srimath Kandada A. R.; Mosconi E.; D’Innocenzo V.; Bertoni G.; Marras S.; Kamino B. A.; Miranda L.; De Angelis F.; et al. Solution Synthesis Approach to Colloidal Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanoplatelets with Monolayer-Level Thickness Control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1010–1016. 10.1021/jacs.5b12124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Akkerman Q. A.; D’Innocenzo V.; Accornero S.; Scarpellini A.; Petrozza A.; Prato M.; Manna L. Tuning the Optical Properties of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals by Anion Exchange Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10276–10281. 10.1021/jacs.5b05602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shamsi J.; Rastogi P.; Caligiuri V.; Abdelhady A. L.; Spirito D.; Manna L.; Krahne R. Bright-Emitting Perovskite Films by Large-Scale Synthesis and Photoinduced Solid-State Transformation of CsPbBr3 Nanoplatelets. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 10206–10213. 10.1021/acsnano.7b04761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Imran M.; Caligiuri V.; Wang M.; Goldoni L.; Prato M.; Krahne R.; De Trizio L.; Manna L. Benzoyl Halides as Alternative Precursors for the Colloidal Synthesis of Lead Based Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2656–2664. 10.1021/jacs.7b13477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Du X.; Wu G.; Cheng J.; Dang H.; Ma K.; Zhang Y.-W.; Tan P.-F.; Chen S. High-Quality CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals for Quantum Dot Light-Emitting Diodes. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 10391–10396. 10.1039/C6RA27665B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. He X.; Qiu Y.; Yang S. Fully-Inorganic Trihalide Perovskite Nanocrystals: A New Research Frontier of Optoelectronic Materials. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700775–1700802. 10.1002/adma.201700775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. West P. R.; Kinsey N.; Ferrera M.; Kildishev A. V.; Shalaev V. M.; Boltasseva A. Adiabatically Tapered Hyperbolic Metamaterials for Dispersion Control of High - K Waves. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 498–505. 10.1021/nl5038352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sreekanth K. V.; De Luca A.; Strangi G. Experimental Demonstration of Surface and Bulk Plasmon Polaritons in Hypergratings. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3291. 10.1038/srep03291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Poddubny A.; Iorsh I.; Belov P.; Kivshar Y. Hyperbolic Metamaterials. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 948–957. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shekhar P.; Atkinson J.; Jacob Z. Hyperbolic Metamaterials: Fundamentals and Applications. Nano Converg. 2014, 1, 14. 10.1186/s40580-014-0014-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Drachev V. P.; Podolskiy V. A.; Kildishev A. V. Hyperbolic Metamaterials: New Physics behind a Classical Problem. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 15048. 10.1364/OE.21.015048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ferrari L.; Wu C.; Lepage D.; Zhang X.; Liu Z. Hyperbolic Metamaterials and Their Applications. Prog. Quantum Electron. 2015, 40, 1–40. 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2014.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Chandrasekar R.; Wang Z.; Meng X.; Azzam S. I.; Shalaginov M. Y.; Lagutchev A.; Kim Y. L.; Wei A.; Kildishev A. V.; Boltasseva A.; et al. Lasing Action with Gold Nanorod Hyperbolic Metamaterials. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 674–680. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shi J.; Liu B.; Li P.; Ng L. Y.; Shen S. Near-Field Energy Extraction with Hyperbolic Metamaterials. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 1217–1221. 10.1021/nl504332t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cortes C. L.; Newman W.; Molesky S.; Jacob Z. Quantum Nanophotonics Using Hyperbolic Metamaterials. J. Opt. 2012, 14, 063001. 10.1088/2040-8978/14/6/063001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Orlov A. A.; Zhukovsky S. V.; Iorsh I. V.; Belov P. A. Controlling Light with Plasmonic Multilayers. Photonics Nanostructures - Fundam. Appl. 2014, 12, 213–220. 10.1016/j.photonics.2014.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Caligiuri V.; De Luca A. Metal-Semiconductor-Oxide Extreme Hyperbolic Metamaterials for Selectable Canalization Wavelength. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 08LT01. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/8/08LT01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Caligiuri V.; Dhama R.; Sreekanth K. V.; Strangi G.; De Luca A. Dielectric Singularity in Hyperbolic Metamaterials: The Inversion Point of Coexisting Anisotropies. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20002. 10.1038/srep20002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Caligiuri V.; Pezzi L.; Veltri A.; De Luca A. Resonant Gain Singularities in 1D and 3D Metal-Dielectric Multilayered Nanostructures. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 1012–1025. 10.1021/acsnano.6b07638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sreekanth K. V.; Alapan Y.; ElKabbash M.; Ilker E.; Hinczewski M.; Gurkan U. A.; De Luca A.; Strangi G. Extreme Sensitivity Biosensing Platform Based on Hyperbolic Metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 621–627. 10.1038/nmat4609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sreekanth K. V.; Alapan Y.; Elkabbash M.; Wen A. M.; Ilker E.; Hinczewski M.; Gurkan U. A.; Steinmetz N. F.; Strangi G. Enhancing the Angular Sensitivity of Plasmonic Sensors Using Hyperbolic Metamaterials. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016, 4, 1767–1772. 10.1002/adom.201600448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Maier S. A.Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, 1st ed.; Springer: New York, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  52. Avrutsky I.; Salakhutdinov I.; Elser J.; Podolskiy V. Highly Confined Optical Modes in Nanoscale Metal-Dielectric Multilayers. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2007, 75, 241402. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.241402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Prodan E.; Nordlander P. Structural Tunability of the Plasmon Resonances in Metallic Nanoshells. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 543–547. 10.1021/nl034030m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Prodan E.; Nordlander P. Plasmon Hybridization in Spherical Nanoparticles. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 5444–5454. 10.1063/1.1647518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Prodan E.; Radloff C.; Halas N. J.; Nordlander P. A Hybridization Model for the Plasmon Response of Complex Nanostructures. Science 2003, 302, 419–422. 10.1126/science.1089171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vassant S.; Hugonin J.; Marquier F.; Greffet J. Berreman Mode and Epsilon near Zero Mode. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 23971. 10.1364/OE.20.023971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Newman W.; Cortes C. L.; Atkinson J.; Pramanik S.; DeCorby R. G.; Jacob Z. Ferrell–Berreman Modes in Plasmonic Epsilon-near-Zero Media. ACS Photonics 2015, 2, 2–7. 10.1021/ph5003297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Javani M. H.; Stockman M. I. Real and Imaginary Properties of Epsilon-Near-Zero Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 107404. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.107404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Fleury R.; Alù A. Enhanced Superradiance in Epsilon-near-Zero Plasmonic Channels. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2013, 87, 201101. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.201101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sreekanth K. V.; Krishna K. H.; De Luca A.; Strangi G. Large Spontaneous Emission Rate Enhancement in Grating Coupled Hyperbolic Metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2015, 4, 6340. 10.1038/srep06340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Krishnamoorthy H. N. S.; Jacob Z.; Narimanov E.; Kretzschmar I.; Menon V. M. Topological Transitions in Metamaterials. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2012, 336, 205–209. 10.1126/science.1219171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hoang T. B.; Akselrod G. M.; Argyropoulos C.; Huang J.; Smith D. R.; Mikkelsen M. H. Ultrafast Spontaneous Emission Source Using Plasmonic Nanoantennas. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7788. 10.1038/ncomms8788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Akselrod G. M.; Argyropoulos C.; Hoang T. B.; Ciracì C.; Fang C.; Huang J.; Smith D. R.; Mikkelsen M. H. Probing the Mechanisms of Large Purcell Enhancement in Plasmonic Nanoantennas. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 835–840. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lakowicz J. R.Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  65. Omogo B.; Aldana J. F.; Heyes C. D. Radiative and Nonradiative Lifetime Engineering of Quantum Dots in Multiple Solvents by Surface Atom Stoichiometry and Ligands. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 2317–2327. 10.1021/jp309368q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ph8b00121_si_001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Photonics are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES