We read with interest the article by Luo et al. [1]. The urokinase-type plasminogen activator system consists of a protease, a receptor urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and inhibitors [2]. Depending on the degree of glycosylation and proteolytic cleavage, soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a circulating protein ranging mostly between 20 and 35 kDa [2]. Luo et al. show that suPAR exhibits high accuracy for both diagnosis and prognosis of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) [1]. We would like to make some comments. While the area under the curve (AUC) for suPAR in order to accurately differentiate severe CAP (SCAP) from CAP is extremely good (AUC of 0.835 (p < 0.001) [1], it was reported poor regarding its ability to differentiate severity of sepsis shock (AUC of 0.62) [3]. An explanation could be that nearly half of critically ill patients especially with septic shock have or develop acute kidney injury (AKI) and 20–25% needs renal replacement therapy (RRT) within the first week of their stay [4]. In the study of Luo, only 22 out of the 103 SCPA patients were in septic shock, so the rate of AKI and CRRT was much lower in Luo’s cohort when compared to a full septic shock cohort [4]. Continuous RRT (CRRT) is performed using membranes that have a cut value of 35–40 kDa, and therefore, some quantity of suPAR will be eliminated [5]. New highly adsorptive membranes (HAM) that can adsorb many molecules with a molecular weight above 35 kDa will even increase this removal [5]. This can mislead patient prognostication by artificially decreasing suPAR, but no studies have challenged this issue. Such studies should be done as there is already a long list of biomarkers in sepsis that are lacking reliability during CRRT [5]. To date, no single sepsis biomarker can be reliable during CRRT. While suPAR might be a good marker of severity in SCAP, this might not be the case for septic shock. A hypothesis that could explain this discrepancy could be the rate of CRRT use in this group of patients that is much higher as compared to SCAP in the Luo’s study. As a consequence of the high CRRT rate, suPAR levels are no longer reliable in septic patients [1].
Acknowledgements
None.
Abbreviations
- uPAR
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor
- suPAR
Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor
- CAP
Community acquired pneumonia
- SCAP
Severe community-acquired pneumonia
- AUC
Area under the curve
- AKI
Acute kidney injury
- RRT
Renal replacement therapy
- CRRT
Continuous renal replacement therapy
- HAM
Highly adsorptive membranes
Authors’ contributions
PMH and DDB designed the paper. All authors participated in drafting and reviewing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
None.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
This comment refers to the article available at 10.1186/s13054-018-1943-y.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Patrick M. Honore, Email: Patrick.Honore@CHU-Brugmann.be
Aude Mugisha, Email: Aude.Mugisha@CHU-Brugmann.be.
Leonel Barreto Gutierrez, Email: Leonel.BarretoGutierrez@CHU-brugmann.be.
Sebastien Redant, Email: Sebastien.Redant@CHU-Brugmann.be.
Keitiane Kaefer, Email: Keitiane.Kaefer@CHU-Brugmann.be.
Andrea Gallerani, Email: Andrea.Gallerani@CHU-Brugmann.be.
David De Bels, Email: David.DeBels@CHU-Brugmann.be.
References
- 1.Luo Q, Ning P, Zheng Y, Shang Y, Zhou B, Gao Z. Serum suPAR and syndecan-4 levels predict severity of community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective, multi-centre study. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1943-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thuno M, Macho B, Eugen-Olsen J. suPAR: the molecular crystal ball. Dis Markers. 2009;27(3):157–172. doi: 10.1155/2009/504294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Koch A, Voigt S, Kruschinski C, Sanson E, Dückers H, Horn A, et al. Circulating soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor is stably elevated during the first week of treatment in the intensive care unit and predicts mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2011;15:R63. doi: 10.1186/cc10037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peters E, Antonelli M, Wittebole X, Nanchal R, François B, Sakr Y, et al. A worldwide multicentre evaluation of the influence of deterioration or improvement of acute kidney injury on clinical outcome in critically ill patients with and without sepsis at ICU admission: results from The Intensive Care Over Nations audit. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2112-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Honoré PM, Jacobs R, De Waele E, Van Gorp V, Spapen HD. Evaluating sepsis during continuous dialysis: are biomarkers still valid? Blood Purif. 2014;38(2):104–105. doi: 10.1159/000363497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.