Vigorous spontaneous inspiratory efforts can lower pleural pressures and increase transpulmonary pressures, worsening existing lung injury. Muscle paralysis [1] may prevent breath stacking and pendelluft associated with high respiratory drive and very negative pleural pressures. A recent and comprehensive study [2] compared two positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategies and found that an oxygenation-based method to select PEEP resulted in strong inspiratory efforts, high local lung stress, and intensely focused inflammation in dependent lung regions. In contrast, high PEEP rendered spontaneous effort less injurious by lowering the level of spontaneous effort via neuromechanical uncoupling (Fig. 1) and by converting solid-like (more atelectatic) lung to fluid-like (less atelectatic) lung, reducing the vertical gradient of inspiratory local negative swings in pleural pressure. Both mechanisms worked together to promote a more homogeneous lung expansion. One of the limitations of a high PEEP strategy is that mechanical ventilation with PEEP may result in longitudinal atrophy of diaphragm fibers [3]. We postulate that in the ROSE trial [4, 5] the use of lung-protective ventilation with high PEEP (instead of a ventilation strategy with low PEEP [6]) reduced potentially injurious transpulmonary pressure swings in both groups, making the muscle paralysis unnecessary and preventing the potential harmful effects of strong spontaneous efforts in moderate-to-severe ARDS.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Authors’ contributions
JBB prepared the first draft of the manuscript. CCAM and ELC performed the manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed reported here are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Animal Ethics Committee approved the experimental investigation from which animal data is reported here.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Slutsky AS. Neuromuscular blocking agents in ARDS. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(12):1176–1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1007136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morais CCA, Koyama Y, Yoshida T, Plens GM, Gomes S, Lima CAS, Ramos OPS, Pereira SM, Kawaguchi N, Yamamoto H, et al. High positive end-expiratory pressure renders spontaneous effort noninjurious. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(10):1285–1296. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1244OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lindqvist J, van den Berg M, van der Pijl R, Hooijman PE, Beishuizen A, Elshof J, de Waard M, Girbes A, Spoelstra-de Man A, Shi ZH, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation induces longitudinal atrophy in diaphragm fibers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(4):472–485. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1917OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PETAL Clinical Trials Network, Moss M, Huang DT, Brower RG, Ferguson ND, Ginde AA, Gong MN, et al. Early neuromuscular blockade in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(21):1997–2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Slutsky Arthur S., Villar Jesús. Early Paralytic Agents for ARDS? Yes, No, and Sometimes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;380(21):2061–2063. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1905627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, et al. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(12):1107–1116. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed reported here are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.