Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2019 Jun 7;124(6):984–991. doi: 10.1111/bju.14804

Health‐related quality of life around the time of diagnosis in patients with bladder cancer

Evan Yi‐Wen Yu 1,2,, Duncan Nekeman 3, Lucinda J Billingham 4, Nicholas D James 5, KK Cheng 3, Richard T Bryan 5, Anke Wesselius 1, Maurice P Zeegers 2
PMCID: PMC6907410  PMID: 31077532

Abstract

Objectives

To quantify the health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with bladder cancer around the time of diagnosis and to test the hypotheses of a two‐factor model for the HRQoL questionnaire QLQ‐C30.

Methods

From participants in the Bladder Cancer Prognoses Programme, a multicentre cohort study, sociodemographic data were collected using semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews. Answers to the QLQ‐C30 were transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. HRQoL data were analysed in multivariate analyses. The hypothesized two‐factor (Physical and Mental Health) domain structure of the QLQ‐C30 was also tested with confirmatory factor analyses (CFA).

Results

A total of 1160 participants (78%) completed the questionnaire after initial visual diagnosis and before pathological confirmation. Despite non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) being associated with a higher HRQoL than carcinoma invading bladder muscle, only the domain Role Functioning was clinically significantly better in patients with NMIBC. Age, gender, bladder cancer stage and comorbidity all had a significant influence on QLQ‐C30 scores. The CFA showed an overall good fit of the hypothesized two‐factor model.

Conclusion

This study identified a baseline reference value for HRQoL for patients with bladder cancer, which allows better evaluation of any changes in HRQoL as disease progresses or after treatment. In addition, a two‐factor (Physical and Mental Health) model was developed for the QLQ‐C30.

Keywords: quality of life, time of diagnosis, cohort study, QLQ‐C30 questionnaire, #BladderCancer, #blcsm


Abbreviations

HRQoL

health‐related quality of life

BCPP

Bladder Cancer Prognoses Programme

CFA

confirmatory factor analyses

NMIBC

non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer

MIBC

carcinoma invading bladder muscle

EORTC

European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer

Introduction

Bladder cancer ranks as the 10th most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide 1, 2. In the UK, the disease accounts for ~10 300 new cases and 5300 deaths per year (Cancer Research UK Cancer Statistics). The majority of patients (75–80%) present with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) 3. Although not immediately life‐threatening in the majority of cases, recurrence and progression of NMIBC remain significant issues, with up to 55% of patients experiencing recurrence within 5 years of diagnosis 4. Current guidelines therefore recommend long‐term surveillance 5, 6. With the UK prevalence of NMIBC estimated at 46 500 by Cancer Research UK, at any one time there will be at least 40 000 patients requiring surveillance episodes at least once per year.

Typically, surveillance comprises outpatient flexible cystoscopy, with or without urine cytology 7, 8. For patients with low‐risk NMIBC, European Association of Urology guidelines recommend follow‐up cystoscopy and urine cytology at 3 and 12 months after transurethral resection of bladder cancer, and then annually thereafter until 5 years. Patients with high‐risk NMIBC undergo more intensive surveillance: every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for the following 3 years, and annually thereafter, most likely for the rest of their lives 9. If recurrence is detected, the tumour is resected and subsequent surveillance will start again, with the frequency determined by the risk category of the recurrence.

Each surveillance cystoscopy and urine cytology episode costs at least £533 10. As a result, bladder cancer is the most costly cancer to treat on a per‐patient basis from diagnosis to death 2, 11. Furthermore, cystoscopy itself significantly increases the burden of disease, as it is an invasive procedure that causes pain and discomfort in about one‐third of patients 12.

As survival amongst patients with NMIBC is high compared with other cancers, and long‐term follow‐up is required, the disease can be considered a chronic disease 13; therefore, health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) plays an important role. To date, however, most HRQoL research has focused on carcinoma invading bladder muscle (MIBC) and, in particular, the differences between different urinary diversions after radical cystectomy 14, 15, 16, but the results are difficult to interpret, as there are often no baseline reference values for comparison. For patients with MIBC, although HRQoL is affected more severely as a result of more radical treatments, a higher chance of metastasis, and worse overall prognosis, it is still an important measure. The few studies that have reported on HRQoL in patients with NMIBC contradict each other 17, 18, 19, 20, 21. In addition to the evidence being sparse, studies have often been hindered by small sample sizes, non‐validated HRQoL questionnaires, and patient populations that are heterogeneous in terms of duration of follow‐up, previous diagnoses of bladder cancer, and number of recurrences or progression.

Additionally, most studies do not take baseline HRQoL into account, which is important for the evaluation of any changes in a patient's HRQoL attributable to disease or treatment. Bladder cancer is a complex disease that often goes undetected for an extended period of time, especially in women 22. This could imply that bladder cancer may have already affected patients’ HRQoL at or around the time of diagnosis, and their HRQoL will not necessarily be the same as that of the general population. It is, therefore, important to study HRQoL at or around the time of bladder cancer diagnosis.

One of the reasons that HRQoL is not often taken into account in studies may result from the complex nature of the questionnaires used to measure HRQoL. More specifically, the commonly used HRQoL questionnaire, the QLQ‐C30 23, has 15 separate domains that need to be compared with each other in order to provide a complete assessment of patients’ HRQoL. Higher‐order models would resolve the issue of too many individual domains. Gundy et al. 24 examined several of these models, including one‐ and two‐factor models, and suggested that a two‐factor model divided into Physical and Mental health provided the best statistical fit.

The aim of the present study was to be the first to quantify and compare HRQoL at or around the time of diagnoses in patients with NMIBC and MIBC separately. Additionally, the study tested the hypothesis of a two‐factor model for the QLQ‐C30.

Methods

Study Design

The present study is part of the West Midlands’ Bladder Cancer Prognoses Programme (BCPP), a multicentre cohort study in the West Midlands, UK (ethics reference: 06/MRE04/65; clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT00553215). Details of the study have been published previously 25. Briefly, adults (age ≥18 years) presenting at haematuria clinics in nine participating urology centres within the region were enrolled on the basis of abnormal cystoscopic findings suggestive of bladder cancer. Those who had a previous diagnosis of cancer of the urethra, bladder, ureter or renal pelvis within the last decade, HIV infection, or any other condition that might interfere with the safety of the participant were excluded. Enrolment took place between 19 December 2005 and 21 April 2011. All participants provided written informed consent before they were included in the study.

Data Collection

At the time of diagnoses, semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews were used by trained research nurses to collect information on socio‐demographics, health‐related lifestyle, medical and drug history, dietary intake, social support and quality of life. The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ‐C30 v3 was used for the collection of the HRQoL data. The transformation of the scores is described in detail elsewhere 26. The QLQ‐C30 is a validated questionnaire specifically developed for measuring HRQoL in people with cancer. It has 30 items assessing 15 domains (one global HRQoL domain, five functional domains, and nine symptom domains). Briefly, the answers are converted into a score from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best quality of life and 0 is the worst for all domains except the nine symptom domains, for which 100 is the most problematic symptom and 0 is no symptoms at all. A difference of 10 points or more is considered clinically relevant 27.

The medical records of each patient were reviewed by trained research nurses, and clinicopathological characteristics of bladder cancers at diagnosis were prospectively gathered on dedicated case report forms. This comprised pT stage (according to the TNM 6th edition 2002 classification system 28), grade (according to the WHO 1973 system 29), size of the largest tumour, the number of visible tumours, and comorbidities. Where early re‐resection (within 3 months after first surgery for bladder cancer) indicated an invasive tumour (≥pT2) contrary to the original assessment, then re‐resection pT stage was recorded as the pT stage at diagnosis. Stage was recoded into a numerical outcome variable suitable for analyses by coding pTa tumours with a value ‘1’ and all other stages in sequence. Comorbidities were defined as any pre‐existing medical conditions, or conditions present at the time of bladder cancer diagnosis. For this study, the number of comorbid conditions for each participant was recoded as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, >5. In addition, a separate variable was generated to recode stage as NMIBC (<pT2) and MIBC (pT2+).

Statistical Analyses

Mean and sd values were calculated for all domains of the QLQ‐C30 to reflect reference values for patients with NMIBC and those with MIBC. The effect of age, gender, stage and comorbidity on the 15 HRQoL domains from the QLQ‐C30 was analysed using multivariate linear regression models. For this analysis, gender (male, female), stage (pTis, pTa, pT1, pT2, pT3, pT4) and comorbidity (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, >5) were included as categorical variables. Statistical differences between the HRQoL domains and NMIBC and MIBC were tested using the two‐group mean‐comparison (anova). A factor analysis was used to detect the underlying hypothesized two‐factor model, a value of 0.45 was used as the cut‐off value for factor loadings. We used confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to test our hypothesis of a two‐factor model. The two overall HRQoL items were not included in the CFA, as this domain (overall HRQoL) is not considered to be part of HRQoL but rather a global domain.

Results

Sociodemographics

During the enrolment period, patients with symptoms related to bladder cancer accompanied by cystoscopically suspicious lesions were recruited. Out of 1534 recruited participants, 1183 were subsequently diagnosed with bladder cancer. Of these, 1160 had completed the questionnaire before they knew the histologically confirmed diagnosis and could therefore be included in the analyses for the present study.

The majority of the study cohort were men (n = 906, 78.1%) and the mean (range) age was 70.4  (26–95) years. Over half of the patients were currently in a relationship (n = 728, 62.8%). Most of the patients presented with NMIBC (n = 890, 76.7%), with pTa the most common tumour stage (n = 575, 49.6%). In addition, 27.4% of the patients had more than five comorbidities, as can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1.

Socio‐demographic characteristics of study participants.

Demographic No. of patients %
Total 1160 100
Men 906 78.1
Women 254 21.9
Age, years
Mean (sd) 70.4 (10.9)  
Range 26–95
Marital status
With partner 728 62.8
Without partner 344 29.7
Missing 88 7.5
Smoking status
Current 228 19.7
Former 612 52.8
Never 217 18.7
Missing 103 8.8
Tumour stage
pTis 14 1.2
pTa 575 49.6
pT1 301 25.9
pT2 233 20.1
pT3 1 0.1
pT4 17 1.5
Missing 19 1.6
Tumour grade
1 254 21.9
2 336 29.0
3 540 46.5
Missing 30 2.6
NMIBC 890 76.7
MIBC 251 21.6
Missing 20 1.7
Comorbidities
0 92 7.9
1 185 16.0
2 156 13.4
3 176 15.2
4 118 10.2
5 115 9.9
>5 318 27.4

MIBC, carcinoma invading bladder muscle; NMIBC, non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. Missing values are not explicitly reported.

Health‐Related Quality of Life in Patients with Non‐Muscle Invasive vs Muscle‐Invasive Bladder Cancer

The mean (sd) overall quality of life score was 69 (23) in patients with NMIBC and 61 (24) in those with MIBC. The functional domains for patients with NMIBC ranged from 76 to 86, whilst in patients with MIBC the same domains ranged from 72 to 81. In both groups (NMIBC and MIBC) the worst symptoms were Fatigue and Insomnia. In general, there were few differences in HRQoL between patients with NMIBC and those with MIBC, with none of the scores differing by at least 10 points, except for Role Functioning (Table 2). It was notable that patients with MIBC always scored lower than those with NMIBC on the QLQ‐C30, with a statistically significant difference in seven domains (Global HRQoL, Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, Social Functioning, Fatigue, Pain, Dyspnoea, Insomnia, and Appetite Loss). The lowest scoring domain in both the NMIBC and MIBC groups was Global HRQoL (69/100 and 61/100, respectively). Scores in all other domains were >75 in the NMIBC group and >65 in the MIBC group.

Table 2.

Health‐related quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire QLQ‐C30 for non‐muscle‐invasive and muscle‐invasive bladder cancer separately.

QLQ‐C30* NMIBC (N = 890) MIBC (N = 251) P
Mean sd Mean sd
Global HRQoL 69 23 61 24 <0.001
Functional domains (0 worst functioning; 100 best functioning)
Physical functioning 84 20 79 23 0.005
Role functioning 83 28 72 34 <0.001
Emotional functioning 76 22 75 23 0.536
Cognitive functioning 84 19 81 23 0.036
Social functioning 86 23 81 28 0.003
Symptom domains (0 No symptoms; 100 worst symptoms)
Fatigue 76 23 69 28 <0.001
Nausea and vomiting 96 11 94 13 0.079
Pain 83 25 76 30 <0.001
Dyspnoea 85 24 81 29 0.015
Insomnia 76 31 67 35 <0.001
Appetite loss 89 22 81 31 <0.001
Constipation 88 23 83 28 0.012
Diarrhoea 94 16 93 18 0.471
Financial difficulties 95 17 93 20 0.147

HRQoL, health‐related quality of life; MIBC, carcinoma invading bladder muscle; NMIBC, non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. P value is for chi‐squared test. *Score range 0–100.

From Table 3, it is clear that age had a statistically significant effect on nearly all functional HRQoL domains, except for Social Functioning. Additionally, age had a statistically significant effect on Fatigue, Dyspnoea, Insomnia, Constipation, Diarrhoea and Financial Difficulties. Increased age was detrimental in all statistically significant domains except for Financial Difficulties, Insomnia, Diarrhoea and Emotional Functioning. The biggest effect was found in the Physical Functioning domain, where a 10‐year increase in age would decrease the score by 4 points. Women had worse outcomes on every statistically significantly different HRQoL domain compared with men. Gender was the only variable that had a clinical impact (>10 points difference), for instance, on the domain Insomnia where men scored 12.19 points higher. All domains of HRQoL were negatively associated with the number of comorbidities. Patients with NMIBC scored better in every HRQoL domain of QLQ‐C30 compared to those with MIBC, although this was not always a statistically significant difference, nor were any of the differences clinically significant.

Table 3.

Multivariate linear regression of age, gender, stage and comorbidity on each health‐related quality of life domain.

QLQ‐C30 domains Age Gender Social support Stage Comorbidity
β P β P β P β P β P
Global HRQoL −0.07 0.015 −4.49 0.007 0.30 <0.001 −6.85 <0.001 −2.83 <0.001
Physical F −0.42 <0.001 −4.83 0.001 0.15 <0.001 −1.77 0.220 −3.21 <0.001
Role F −0.26 0.002 −1.19 0.577 0.26 <0.001 −8.16 <0.001 −3.26 <0.001
Emotional F 0.28 <0.001 −6.99 <0.001 0.20 <0.001 −0.77 0.640 −1.78 <0.001
Cognitive F −0.09 0.024 0.61 0.685 0.19 <0.001 −1.78 0.236 −1.82 <0.001
Social F 0.01 0.836 −2.87 0.113 0.22 <0.001 −4.03 0.026 −2.24 <0.001
Fatigue −0.12 0.029 −5.26 0.002 0.26 <0.001 −5.02 0.004 −3.61 <0.001
Nausea and vomiting 0.06 0.072 −5.33 <0.001 0.04 0.027 −1.23 0.166 −0.60 0.002
Pain −0.02 0.824 −4.01 0.037 0.25 <0.001 −5.43 0.005 −3.56 <0.001
Dyspnoea −0.21 0.004 0.06 0.972 0.09 0.021 −2.64 0.153 −3.24 <0.001
Insomnia 0.37 <0.001 −12.19 <0.001 0.25 <0.001 −8.41 <0.001 −3.22 <0.001
Appetite loss −0.02 0.771 −7.81 <0.001 0.25 <0.001 −7.06 <0.001 −1.15 0.003
Constipation −0.30 <0.001 −2.50 0.171 0.13 0.002 −3.02 0.098 −1.28 0.001
Diarrhoea 0.11 0.020 −2.72 0.029 0.11 <0.001 −0.67 0.592 −1.14 <0.001
Financial difficulties 0.24 <0.001 0.07 0.958 0.20 0.03 −2.17 0.097 −1.05 <0.001

HRQoL, Health‐related quality of life. β, unstandardized coefficient of the multivariate linear regression analyses; F represents a functional domain.

Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Two‐Factor Model

The factor analyses showed that eight items (items 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 25 and 28) did not fit the two‐factor model (factor loading <0.45), most of which pertained to the one‐item domains such as Sleep (item 11), Appetite Loss (item 13), Constipation (item 16), Diarrhoea (item 17), and Financial Difficulties (item 28), as well as the two‐item domains such as, Nausea and Vomiting (items 14 and 15), and Cognitive Functioning (items 20 and 25). The domains Fatigue (items 10, 12, 18), Physical Functioning (items 1–5), Role Functioning (items 6 and 7), Dyspnoea (item 8), Pain (item 9 and 19), and Social Functioning (items 26 and 27) loaded onto factor 1 (Physical Health) and the domains Cognitive Functioning (item 20), and Emotional Functioning (items 21–24) loaded onto factor 2 (Mental Health). The sample size for the CFA, using the Physical/Mental Health model discussed above, was 1036; 124 patients had missing data for at least one of the 28 items. The comparative fit index was 0.97, the Tucker–Lewis fit index was 0.95, and the root mean squared error of approximation was 0.05 (90% CI 0.048–0.057; P‐close = 0.20). In addition, the coefficient of determination was 0.95 (interpreted as 95% of the variance in the observed variables being explained by the model) and the standardized root mean squared residual was 0.034.

The differences between Physical/Mental Health, stratified by the sociodemographic characteristics, are shown in Table 4. Again, there were differences among the various categories within each stratum, amongst, differences between the 1) most invasive tumour stage pT4 (n = 17) and non‐invasive tumour stage pT1 or below (n = 890), 2) the most comorbidities (>5) and the non‐comorbidity, were both larger than 10 points. Apart from tumour stage, the biggest difference was observed in the age strata, where patients aged >75 years and those aged <65 years differed by 8 points for Physical Health. The Physical and Mental health domains had a good correlation (r = 0.82).

Table 4.

Physical and mental health scores across the different sociodemographic variables.

Demographic Physical health Mental health
Mean sd Mean sd
Gender
Male 80*** 20 81* 17
Female 75 22 78 19
Age
≤65 years (1) 83*** 20 81* 19
66–75 years (2) 80 20 82 16
>75 years (3) 75 21 79 18
Marital status
With partner 75*** 23 79 20
Without partner 81 21 81 17
Smoking status
Current 78* 23 79 21
Former 78 21 80 18
Never 82 20 83 17
Tumour stage
pTis 82*** 21 85** 13
pTa 81 19 82 16
pT1 79 21 81 18
pT2 75 23 78 18
pT3 73 87
pT4 69 32 71 25
NMIBC 80*** 20 81* 17
MIBC 74 23 78 19
Comorbidity
0 94*** 14 87*** 17
1 93 13 86 15
2 88 17 86 16
3 82 19 80 17
4 83 20 81 18
5 79 22 80 17
>5 70 25 73 23

MIBC, carcinoma invading bladder muscle; NMIBC, non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate HRQoL in patients with NMIBC and those with MIBC at this specific time point: around the time of diagnosis. Interestingly, the HRQoL of both the NMIBC and MIBC groups was relatively high: none of the mean values for each domain fell below 60, and patients in both groups even scored >90 in a number of domains. In addition, we identified that reduced HRQoL was common in women and in patients with the features of aging and advanced tumour stage. Furthermore, patients with bladder cancer who had more comorbid conditions were much more likely to report poor HRQoL.

It is important to recognize that people with bladder cancer may have a different baseline HRQoL compared with the general population, as the disease may have already had an impact at or around the time of diagnosis. No reference data are available for the general population in the UK; however, the mean scores of HRQoL (QLQ‐C30) for the present study population were lower than data for the general populations of Germany, Norway, Sweden and Slovenia 30, 31, 32, 33, but higher than the general population of the USA 34. It is therefore, possible that HRQoL reference values for patients with bladder cancer depend on cultural factors; for example, Scandinavian populations have a high standard of living 35. This could lead to a greater difference in HRQoL among patients with bladder cancer from different countries.

Although it is more likely that cancer treatment (i.e. surgery, chemotherapy, radiation) will have an effect on HRQoL, an immediate change to an individual's HRQoL at diagnosis may depend on the type of cancer. Compared with people in the UK diagnosed with several other cancer types, including breast 36, lung 37, 38, colorectal 39, head and neck 40, malignant mesothelioma 41, endometrial cancer 42, oral and oropharyngeal cancer 43, the patients with bladder cancer in the present study had higher HRQoL scores for all domains, which might be attributable to the poorer prognoses for these other cancer types.

No clinically significant differences (>10 points) in HRQoL domains were found between patients with NMIBC and those with MIBC, except for Role Functioning. This might be attributable to the unique time point at which the questionnaire was administered, namely, before histopathological confirmation of diagnosis. Previous studies have found significantly worse HRQoL values between 3 and 18 months after diagnosis 44, 45, 46. However, in the present study it was apparent that the disease had already affected patients such that a difference between patients with NMIBC and MIBC could be identified in the Role Functioning domain (indicating that patients with MIBC feel more restricted in fulfilling their role in society) even at this early time point in the patient pathway. Nevertheless, patients with MIBC did not report higher pain levels or more restrictive Physical Functioning, possibly in contrast to what might be expected 47.

As demonstrated by multivariate analyses, age, gender, stage and comorbidity significantly influenced HRQoL. Overall, increased age, stage and comorbidity quantities were related to worse HRQoL. The tendency for women with bladder cancer to have a lower HRQoL than men with bladder cancer is consistent with some study findings in the general population 30, 31, 48, 49 and in other cancer types 50, 51, and also with earlier population studies showing that, on average, women reported a higher proportion of health problems 52.

It was not surprising that age was observed to be an important factor for defining HRQoL. Older participants experienced a deterioration for most of the functional scales, except for Emotional Functioning which was slightly increased in older people, and Social Functioning which was found to be unrelated to age. These findings are in line with earlier studies in general populations from other European countries 30, 31, 32, 33.

Comorbidity may in itself influence HRQoL because of the unique physical impact of the specific health condition and may thus play an important role when assessing HRQoL at the time of bladder cancer diagnosis. Indeed, we observed that comorbidity related to a decreased HRQoL, indicating that the presence of comorbidity before bladder cancer diagnosis may already have caused decrements in HRQoL. Since a more advanced tumour stage might cause more fear of progression and death, it was not unexpected to observe that tumour stage negatively affected HRQoL. Previous studies in other cancer types (e.g. oropharyngeal cancer 53 and prostate cancer 54) confirmed this finding. Both tumour‐specific features and comorbidity should be evaluated in patients with bladder cancer for better understanding of HRQoL.

It should be noted, however, that not all of the statistical differences observed in our multivariate analysis met the definition of clinical impact (all β coefficients <10); women were the exception, having substantially worse scores in the Insomnia domain. Furthermore, the β coefficient for age was relatively small per 1‐year difference, further implying limited clinical impact. The biggest impact of age can be found in Physical Functioning (β = 0.56), although a 10‐year age difference would only alter a patient's score by 5.6 points (on a scale from 0 to 100).

The factor analyses showed similar results to those of Gundy et al. [24]: we detected a two‐factor model for the analyses of the QLQ‐C30, even though not all the same items could be retained. We tested this model with CFA, which resulted in a well‐fitting model. Interestingly, the items that did not load highly onto the factors were single‐item symptom domains such as, Insomnia, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhoea, and Financial Difficulties. This could suggest that they do not contribute as much to overall HRQoL in these patients. Having a two‐factor model indicating Physical and Mental Health would increase the usability of the HRQoL questionnaire QLQ‐C30.

The EORTC has published a comprehensive report containing QLQ‐C30 reference values for a wide variety of cancers 55, 56. Compared with these reference values for patients with cancer overall 57, BCPP participants had similar scores. EORTC reference scores for patients with prostate cancer in stage I–II were similar to patients with NMIBC in the BCPP (although patients with prostate cancer did seem to have better Physical Functioning) and scores for patients with MIBC in the BCPP had similar scores to patients with stage III–IV prostate cancer (except for Physical Functioning, which was worse in those with prostate cancer). Reference values for patients with lung cancer were worse than for patients with MIBC in the BCPP cohort, with the exception of Cognitive Functioning values, which were similar.

As no UK QLQ‐C30 data are available for patients with bladder cancer at or around the time of diagnosis, the aim of the present study was to provide the first such data. To assess the generalizability of the present study population and findings, we compared our study demographics with the West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit data. We found no major differences with regard to age and gender (data not shown). In addition, the distribution of patients with NMIBC (78%) and MIBC (22%) in the BCPP corresponds with that in the literature from the UK 58; therefore, the results of the present study could be used as a reference population for future research into the HRQoL of patients with bladder cancer at or around the time of diagnosis in the UK and beyond.

It is important to note that these data from the BCPP have been captured from patients presenting in a conventional manner, having been referred from primary care to secondary care for the further investigation of symptoms, predominantly in a haematuria clinic setting; however, up to 18.5% of patients with bladder cancer present as emergency cases 59, and it is likely that these patients will have different HRQoL than those presenting conventionally.

In conclusion, this is the largest NMIBC patient cohort that has participated in HRQoL research. The study captured the HRQoL at a unique time point, allowing the identification of a baseline HRQoL measure. Our findings suggest that patients’ HRQoL scores at or around the time of bladder cancer diagnosis are very similar to those of the general population of Germany and possibly the UK. Only the domain Role Functioning was found to be significantly better in patients with NMIBC than those with MIBC at this time point.

The HRQoL scores given in the present study are interesting from a clinical point of view. Comparisons with HRQoL scores at the time of diagnosis give a better insight into any changes in a patient's HRQoL attributable to the disease or treatment.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgements

We thank all participating clinicians and their staff from within the West Midlands region for their continued support: P. Cooke, K. Jefferson, H. Krasnowski, J. Parkin, B.D. Sarmah, P. Ryan, R. Bhatt, M. Foster, K. Desai, L.A. Emtage, K.W. Kadow, C. Luscombe, S. Khwaja, and A. Makar. We would also like to recognize the invaluable contribution made by the BCPP nursing, research and administrative staff to the programme: A. McGuire, C. Langford, C. Letchford, C. Slater, C. Taylor, D. Bird, G. Heritage, H. Shackleford, J. Sears, J. Maiden, J. Goodall, J. Allison, J. Hutton, J.Y. Robinson, K. Castro, L.R. Moore, L. Benson, M. Grant, R. Abid, S. Collins, T. Martin, and T. Coles. In addition, we thank R.C. Reulen for his substantial help with data management and the West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit for providing data on patients with bladder cancer in the West Midlands. The author Evan Yi‐Wen Yu gratefully acknowledges financial support from China Scholarship Council (NO. 201706310135).

This project was partly funded by Cancer Research UK

References

  • 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Svatek RS, Hollenbeck BK, Holmang S et al. The economics of bladder cancer: costs and considerations of caring for this disease. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 253–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bryan RT, Zeegers MP, van Roekel EH et al. A comparison of patient and tumour characteristics in two UK bladder cancer cohorts separated by 20 years. BJU Int 2013; 112: 169–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden APM, Oosterlinck W et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 466–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 Update. Eur Urol 2018; 73: 111–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS. Bladder cancer. Lancet 2009; 374: 239–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Westhoff E, Wu X, Kiemeney LA et al. Dietary patterns and risk of recurrence and progression in non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 2018; 142: 1797–804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Moran ME, Moll FH. History of cystoscopy. The history of technologic advancements in urology. Springer, 2018; 3–20 [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, Kaasinen E, Böhle A, Palou‐Redorta J. EAU guidelines on non‐muscle‐invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 303–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mowatt G, Zhu S, Kilonzo M et al. Systematic review of the clinical and cost‐effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis and urine biomarkers (FISH, ImmunoCyt, NMP22) and cytology for the detection and follow‐up of bladder cancer. Health Technol Assess 2010; 14: 1–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Riley GF, Potosky AL, Lubitz JD, Kessler LG. Medicare payments from diagnosis to death for elderly cancer patients by stage at diagnosis. Med Care 1995; 33: 828–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Koo K, Zubkoff L, Sirovich BE et al. The burden of cystoscopic bladder cancer surveillance: anxiety, discomfort, and patient preferences for decision making. Urology 2017; 108: 122–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. van Rhijn BW, Burger M, Lotan Y et al. Recurrence and progression of disease in non–muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: from epidemiology to treatment strategy. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 430–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Milowsky MI, Rumble RB, Lee CT. Guideline on muscle‐invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (European Association of Urology guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement summary. J Clin Oncol 2016; 12: 588–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Somani BK, MacLennan SJ, N'Dow J. Quality of life with urinary diversion. Eur Urol Suppl 2010; 9: 763–71 [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Botteman MF, Pashos CL, Hauser RS, Laskin BL, Redaelli A. Quality of life aspects of bladder cancer: a review of the literature. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 675–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Gerharz EW, Månsson Å, Månsson W, eds. Quality of Life in Patients with Bladder Cancer. Philadelphia. PA: Elsevier, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Yoshimura K, Utsunomiya N, Ichioka K, Matsui Y, Terai A, Arai Y. Impact of superficial bladder cancer and transurethral resection on general health‐related quality of life: an SF‐36 survey. Urology 2005; 65: 290–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bohle A, Balck F, Von Wietersheim J, Jocham D. The quality of life during intravesical bacillus Calmette‐Guerin therapy. J Urol 1996; 155: 1221–6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Truta A, Popon TAH, Saraci G, Ghervan L, Pop IV. Health related quality of life in bladder cancer. Current approach and future perspectives. Clujul Med 2017; 90: 262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mason SJ, Downing A, Wright P et al. Health‐related quality of life after treatment for bladder cancer in England. Br J Cancer 2018; 118: 1518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bryan RT, Evans T, Dunn JA et al. A comparative analysis of the influence of gender, pathway delays, and risk factor exposures on the long‐term outcomes of bladder cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2015; 1: 82–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ‐C30: a quality‐of‐life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Gundy CM, Fayers PM, Groenvold M et al. Comparing higher order models for the EORTC QLQ‐C30. Qual Life Res 2012; 21: 1607–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zeegers MP, Bryan RT, Langford C et al. The West Midlands Bladder cancer prognosis programme: rationale and design. BJU Int 2010; 105: 784–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenveld M, Curran D, Bottomley A. The EORTC QLQ‐C30 Scoring Manual, Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 2001: 98 [Google Scholar]
  • 27. King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ‐C30. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 555–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Gospodarowicz MK, Brierley JD, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Sussex, UK; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Mostofi FK, Sobin LH, Torloni H. Histological Typing of Urinary Bladder Tumours. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Schwarz R, Hinz A. Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ‐C30 in the general German population. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37: 1345–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Bjordal K, Kaasa S. Health‐related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality‐of‐Life Questionnaire: the QLQ=C30 (+ 3). J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 1188–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Michelson H, Bolund C, Nilsson B, Brandberg Y. Health‐related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ‐C30: reference values from a large sample of the Swedish population. Acta Oncol 2000; 39: 477–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Velenik V, Secerov‐Ermenc A, But‐Hadzic J, Zadnik V. Health‐related Quality of Life Assessed by the EORTC QLQ‐C30 Questionnaire in the General Slovenian Population. Radiol Oncol 2017; 51: 342–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Smith AB, Jaeger B, Pinheiro LC et al. Impact of bladder cancer on health‐related quality of life. BJU Int 2018; 121: 549–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient‐Reported Outcomes. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hopwood P, Haviland J, Mills J, Sumo G, M Bliss J, START Trial Management Group . The impact of age and clinical factors on quality of life in early breast cancer: an analysis of 2208 women recruited to the UK START Trial (Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy Trial). Breast 2007; 16: 241–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Pompili C, Velikova G, White J et al. Poor preoperative patient‐reported quality of life is associated with complications following pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2017; 51: 526–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Nimako K, Ayite B, Priest K et al. A randomised assessment of the use of a quality of life questionnaire with or without intervention in patients attending a thoracic cancer clinic. Eur J Cancer Care 2017; 26: e12402 10.1111/ecc.12402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Radwan RW, Codd RJ, Wright M et al. Quality‐of‐life outcomes following pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 1574–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Llewellyn CD, McGurk M, Weinman J. Head and neck cancer: to what extent can psychological factors explain differences between health‐related quality of life and individual quality of life? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 44: 351–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Arnold DT, Rowen D, Versteegh MM, Morley A, Hooper CE, Maskell NA. Testing mapping algorithms of the cancer‐specific EORTC QLQ‐C30 onto EQ‐5D in malignant mesothelioma. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13: 6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Smits A, Lopes A, Das N, Bekkers R, Galaal K. The impact of BMI on quality of life in obese endometrial cancer survivors: does size matter? Gynecol Oncol 2014; 132: 137–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Shepherd KL, Fisher SE. Prospective evaluation of quality of life in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer: from diagnosis to three months post‐treatment. Oral Oncol 2004; 40: 751–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tyson MD 2nd, Barocas DA. Quality of life after radical cystectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2018; 45: 249–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kulaksizoglu H, Toktas G, Kulaksizoglu IB, Aglamis E, Ünlüer E. When should quality of life be measured after radical cystectomy? Eur Urol 2002; 42: 350–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Singer S, Ziegler C, Schwalenberg T, Hinz A, Götze H, Schulte T. Quality of life in patients with muscle invasive and non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21: 1383–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Reeve BB, Potosky AL, Smith AW et al. Impact of cancer on health‐related quality of life of older Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101: 860–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF‐36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1349–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Brorsson B, Ifver J, Hays R. The Swedish health‐related quality of life survey (SWED‐QUAL). Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 33–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Westby RP, Berg CJ, Leach C. Gender, race, BMI, and social support in relation to the health‐related quality of life of cancer survivors: a report from the American Cancer Society's Study of Cancer Survivors II (SCS‐II). Qual Life Res 2016; 25: 409–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. LeMasters T, Madhavan S, Sambamoorthi U, Kurian S. A population‐based study comparing HRQoL among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors to propensity score matched controls, by cancer type, and gender. Psycho Oncol 2013; 22: 2270–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Moum T. Self‐assessed health among Norwegian adults. Soc Sci Med 1992; 35: 935–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Oates J, Davies S, Roydhouse JK, Fethney J, White K. The effect of cancer stage and treatment modality on quality of life in oropharyngeal cancer. Laryngoscope 2014; 124: 151–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Vanagas G, Mickeviciene A, Ulys A. Does quality of life of prostate cancer patients differ by stage and treatment? Scand J Public Health 2013; 41: 58–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Scott NW, Fayers P, Aaronson NK et al. EORTC QLQ‐C30 reference values manual, 2008.
  • 56. Sprangers MA, Bonnetain F. EORTC QLQ‐C30. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well‐Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014:1933–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Fayers P. Interpreting quality of life data: population‐based reference data for the EORTC QLQ‐C30. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37: 1331–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Boustead GB, Fowler S, Swamy R, Kocklebergh R, Hounsome L. Stage, grade and pathological characteristics of bladder cancer in the UK: British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) urological tumour registry. BJU Int 2014; 113: 924–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Abel GA, Shelton J, Johnson S, Elliss‐Brookes L, Lyratzopoulos G. Cancer‐specific variation in emergency presentation by sex, age and deprivation across 27 common and rarer cancers. Br J Cancer 2015; 112: S129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bju International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES