Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Dec 12;9:18963. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55611-y

Characterization of vaginal microbiota in women with preterm labor with intra-amniotic inflammation

Teresa Cobo 1,2,, Andrea Vergara 3, Maria Carmen Collado 4, Climent Casals-Pascual 3, Eduardo Herreros 1, Jordi Bosch 3, Ana B Sánchez-García 1, Rosa López-Parellada 1, Júlia Ponce 1, Eduard Gratacós 1,2
PMCID: PMC6908687  PMID: 31831820

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relation between vaginal microbiota and exposition to intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI). We conducted a prospective cohort study in women with preterm labor <34 weeks who had undergone amniocentesis to rule out IAI. Vaginal samples were collected after amniocentesis. Women with IAI included those with positive amniotic fluid (AF) for a microorganism identified by specific culture media and Sanger sequencing 16S ribosomal RNA gene and/or high AF interleukin (IL)-6 levels. Vaginal microbiota was characterized by 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing. Specific quantitative PCR targeted to Lactobacillus spp. was also performed. Regression models were used to evaluate associations between vaginal microbiota and exposition to IAI. Concerning our results, 64 women were included. We observed an inverse association between AF IL-6 levels and load of Lactobacillus spp. Depletion in Lactobacillus spp. load was significantly associated with an early gestational age at delivery and a short latency to delivery. Microbial-diversity was found to be a risk factor for the subsequent occurrence of clinical chorioamnionitis. To the contrary, higher Lactobacillus spp. load had a protective role. In conclusion, the study identifies reduced bacterial load of Lactobacillus spp. in women exposed to IAI and found microbial-diversity and Lactobacillus spp. depletion to be associated with a worse perinatal outcome.

Subject terms: Bacterial genes, Predictive markers

Introduction

The effects of prematurity on infants, parents and society make preterm birth an important issue in public health worldwide1. The time of presentation of symptoms is important in the pathophysiology of preterm labor (PTL)2,3. Therefore, the earliest spontaneous preterm births (sPTB)4 are most likely considered related to intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI).

IAI can develop through microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) or through other mechanisms related to endogenous mediators from the placenta and fetal membranes that trigger IAI similarly to MIAC but leading to “sterile” IAI5.

The use of next-generation sequencing techniques has been instrumental to describe and characterize the healthy human vaginal environment. The depletion of Lactobacillus spp. has been related to a poor reproductive6 and infectious outcome710.

Little is known on the relation between vaginal microbiota composition and exposition to IAI in women with PTL. Concerning this, Hitti et al.11 did observe a high expression of vaginal cytokines, an abnormal vaginal Gram stain, absence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus and the presence of anaerobic vaginal flora in the vaginal cultures of women with MIAC and IAI. However, this standard microbiological method of diagnosis only identifies a small part of the multitude of microorganisms, many of which are very difficult to cultivate, or are considered non-cultivable.

In this scenario, the main aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between vaginal microbiota and exposition to IAI in women with PTL determined by 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing and specific quantitative PCR targeted to Lactobacillus spp. We also aimed to investigate the association between vaginal microbiota and gestational age at delivery and other infectious/inflammatory outcomes.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the study population

Sixty-nine women were included. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy management are summarized in Table 1. Data of delivery was missing in 5 women with No-MIAC/Non-IAI.

Table 1.

Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes.

IAI (n = 21) No-MIAC/Non-IAI (n = 43) p
Maternal age (y) 32.0 (26.8; 36.4) 33.2 (28.8; 38.3) 0.548
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) 22.2 (20.5; 25.8) 22.3 (20.9; 25.5) 0.966
Ethnicity 0.287
-Caucasian 13 (62) 31 (72)
-Afro-Caribbean 2 (10) 1 (2)
-Arabian 5 (24) 7 (16)
-Black 0 2 (5)
-Asian 1 (5) 0
-Other 0 2 (5)
Nulliparity 14 (67) 23 (53) 0.316
Smoking 3 (14) 3 (7) 0.346
Diabetes 0 1 (2) 0.481
Gestational age at admission (w) 25.7 (23.2; 28.1) 29.7 (25.9; 31.6) 0.001
Gestational age at vaginal sampling (w) 25.7 (23.3; 28.3) 29.9 (26.4; 31.7) 0.001
CRP (mg/dL) at admission 2.1 (0.9; 4.0) 0.5 (0.3; 1.1) <0.001
WBC count (×109) at admission 13580 (10730; 15295) 12280 (9010; 15200) 0.268
Amniotic fluid IL-6 (ng/mL) 51.6 (23.4; 187.3) 1.2 (0.7; 2.7) <0.001
Cervical length (mm) at admission 8.0 (0; 16.5) 11.0 (6.0; 22.0) 0.128
Antibiotics prior to vaginal sampling 10 (48) 9 (21) 0.028
Latency from antibiotic administration to vaginal sampling (d) 0.5 (0; 1) 0.5 (0; 2) 0.652
Steroids prior to vaginal sampling 9 (43) 32 (74) 0.013
Tocolysis during lung maturation 15 (71) 41 (95) 0.012
Cerclage prior to vaginal sampling 3 (14) 2 (5) 0.177
Latency from sampling to delivery (d) 4.0 (1.0; 12.5) 42.0 (19.0; 67.8) <0.001
Gestational age at delivery (w) 27.6 (25.6; 30.4) 36.8 (32.4; 38.4) <0.001
- Spontaneous delivery <28.0 w 11/15 (73) 0 <0.001
- Spontaneous delivery <32.0 w 19/20 (95) 8/32 (25) <0.001
- Spontaneous delivery <34.0 w 19 (90) 13/38 (34) <0.001
- Spontaneous delivery <37 w 20 (95) 19/38 (50) <0.001
Clinical chorioamnionitis at the onset of labor 6 (29) 1/38 (3) 0.003

Two vaginal samples were excluded from the analyses due to the low number of reads obtained and three due to the presence of high levels of Burkholderia cepacia, considered external contaminant bacteria.

The final sub-set (n = 64) included 14 women with MIAC.

The most common microorganism identified in the amniotic fluid was Ureaplasma spp. (n = 5). Others were Mycoplasma hominis (n = 1), Mycoplasma hominis and Fusobacterium nucleatum (n = 1), Sneathia sanguinegens and Prevotella amnii (n = 1), Streptococcus agalactiae (n = 1), Streptococcus lutetiensis (n = 1), Capnocytophaga sputigena (n = 1), Candida albicans (n = 1), Roseomonas mucosa (n = 1), Rhodococcus spp. (n = 1). The only microorganisms identified by Sanger sequencing 16S ribosomal RNA but not by culture were Roseomonas mucosa and Rhodococcus spp. Both presented high levels of amniotic fluid IL-6. The other microorganisms were identified by culture and confirmed by Sanger sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene.

Alpha and Beta-diversity of the vaginal microbiota in women with IAI

Women with IAI had higher microbial-diversity (p = 0.008, Shannon index) but not higher richness than the No-MIAC/Non-IAI group (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Boxplot showing alpha diversity metrics of Shannon index (microbial-diversity) and Chao1 (richness) in women with or without IAI. (B) Comparison and relative abundance of microbial taxa at family level in women with or without IAI. (C) Comparison and relative abundance of microbial taxa at genus level in women with or without IAI.

Beta-diversity analysis of microbial communities using both weighted and unweighted UNIFRAC and, also, Bray Curtis distance did not show differences in clustering by IAI (Supplemental data S1).

Vaginal microbiota composition in women with IAI

Differences in the relative abundance of bacteria have been observed at family (Fig. 1B) and genus level (Fig. 1C). A higher relative abundance of Lactobacillus genus was observed in women with No-MIAC/Non-IAI and a higher microbial-diversity in women with IAI.

Using the LEfSe test at the genus level, we found enrichment of Ureaplasma (LDA 4.34 score, p = 0.008), Peptoniphilus (LDA 3.73 score, p = 0.050), Gardnerella (LDA 4.56 score, p = 0.039) and Haemophilus (LDA 4.37 score, p = 0.077) in women with IAI and of Lactobacillus (LDA 5.09, p = 0.038) in women with No-MIAC/Non-IAI (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

LEfSe test at genus level.

Similar observation on Lactobacillus genus abundance was observed by both methodologies, sequencing as relative abundance (p = 0.015) and specific qPCR as total load (p = 0.043). We found a depletion of Lactobacillus spp. load in women with IAI but not of Lactobacilllus iners (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Lactobacillus spp. (A) and L. iners (B) relative abundance (%) by sequencing and total load by specific quantitative PCR.

Correlation between microorganisms found in the AF and vaginal microbiota

Correlation between microorganisms isolated in the AF and vaginal microbiota was performed using Spearman correlation analysis (Fig. 4). Most of the microorganisms isolated in the AF were also found in the vaginal microbiota except for Roseomonas mucosa, Rhodococcus spp. and Capnocytophaga sputigena.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Spearman correlation analysis between amniotic fluid and vaginal microbiota.

Association between IAI and vaginal microbiota

We observed a significant inverse association between IL-6 concentrations and load of Lactobacillus spp. (β −0.253, t −2.76, p 0.008).

No association was found between microbial-diversity and IL-6 (β 0.334, t 1.77), p 0.081).

Vaginal microbiota and infectious outcomes

Microbial-diversity (Shannon index) was found to be a risk factor (OR 4.1 95% CI 1.18–14.09) for the subsequent occurrence of clinical chorioamnionitis. To the contrary, Lactobacillus spp. load had a protective role (OR of 0.5 95% CI 0.29–0.88).

Vaginal microbiota, gestational age at delivery and spontaneous preterm birth

Lactobacillus spp. load depletion was significantly associated with an early gestational age at delivery (β 0.359, t (57) 2.742, p 0.008) and a short latency from vaginal sampling to delivery (β 0.29, 2.151 (57), p 0.036). To the contrary, in the binary logistic regression model, the Lactobacillus spp. load was found to be a protective factor for the occurrence of spontaneous delivery within 7 days (OR of 0.34 95% CI 0.17–0.68) and <34 weeks (OR 0.55 95% CI 0.31–0.98). The ROC curve showed an area under the curve of load of Lactobacillus spp. for predicting sPTB <34 weeks of 0.69, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.55–0.83. No associations between Lactobacillus iners and the different outcomes evaluated were observed.

Discussion

Our study showed that total Lactobacillus genus load is inversely associated with IAI. In agreement with previous studies1315, Lactobacillus spp. depletion is associated with early gestational age at delivery and short latency from vaginal sampling to delivery. Furthermore, both microbial-diversity and Lactobacillus spp. depletion are associated with subsequent clinical chorioamnionitis.

It is well known that the prevalence of IAI is of up to 40% when symptoms of PTL occur <28 weeks24. For clinicians, the importance to identify this inflammatory condition is to select the group of women with the highest risk of delivery within the following days16.

Despite the clinical relevance of IAI, amniocentesis is still required for achieving diagnosis at present. This has become an incentive to explore the intra-amniotic environment through alternative and non-invasive strategies such as the characterization of the vaginal or the cervical fluid microbiota composition.

Lactobacillus has been proposed as one of the vaginal microbes that modulate maternal response to infection and down-regulates inflammation7,8,10 inhibiting induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines17. Concerning pregnancy, there is increasing evidence showing that non-Lactobacillus bacteria generally associated with bacterial vaginosis are highly correlated with the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which may play a role in the onset of labor in women with sPTB10,18. Moreover, there are some trials suggesting a reduction in the recurrence of bacterial vaginosis in women treated with Lactobacillus19.

What is of note in our paper is that it characterizes vaginal microbiota composition in women with PTL who had undergone amniocentesis to rule out IAI. In this regard, Hitti et al.11 did observe a high expression of vaginal cytokines, an abnormal vaginal Gram stain, absence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus and the presence of anaerobic microorganisms in the vaginal cultures of women with MIAC and IAI. In line with these authors, we also found a depletion of Lactobacillus spp. in women with IAI although we did not find differences in microbial-diversity. What differentiates our findings from those observed by Hitti et al.11 was the methodology used to characterize vaginal microbiota composition. The performance of molecular techniques detecting specific bacterial fragments (such as PCR targeted to Lactobacillus spp.) and non-specific bacterial fragments (such as 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing) improves the identification of the composition of vaginal microbiota in comparison to the standard culture used by Hitti et al.11.

In PPROM without labor, the only previous study describing cervical microbiota in women with IAI was by Kacerovsky et al.12. These authors observed a significant depletion of Lactobacillus spp. and a high abundance of bacteria typically associated with bacterial vaginosis in women exposed to MIAC and/or IAI. In contrast, women with No-MIAC/Non-IAI were characterized by an abundance of Lactobacillus crispatus suggesting a protective role of these bacteria against the exposition to MIAC and/or IAI. We found an inverse association between bacterial load of Lactobacillus spp. and exposition to IAI. Thus, similar to Kacerovsky et al.12, we observed a high microbial-diversity in women with IAI with an enrichment of bacteria related to bacterial vaginosis including Ureaplasma, Prevotella, Haemophilus and Peptoniphilus. Interestingly, the presence of IAI was related to a depletion of Lactobacillus spp. load.

In line with other authors1315, we also observed an inverse association between total Lactobacillus genus load and gestational age at delivery. However, unlike some authors such as Kindinger et al.13 and Petricevic et al.14, we did not observe an association between Lactobacillus iners and the risk of sPTB.

In women with PPROM, Brown et al.20 did observe an association between vaginal dysbiosis and the occurrence of histological chorioamnionitis and funisitis but Jayaprakas et al.21 did not. Unfortunately, we were not able to accurately evaluate the association between vaginal microbiota and histological chorioamnionitis or funisitis. However, we found microbial-diversity to be a risk factor (OR 4.07 95% CI 1.2–14.1) and Lactobacillus spp., a protective bacteria (OR of 0.5 95% CI 0.29–0.89) for the subsequent occurrence of clinical chorioamnionitis.

One of the main strengths of our study was the well-characterized infectious/inflammatory phenotype of our unique cohort that routinely performs amniocentesis to identify IAI as part of clinical management in women with PTL. Concerning this, there is emerging data emphasizing the importance to initiate antenatal antibiotic treatment early in the group of women with MIAC. Thus, Yoon et al.22 have recently reported that eradication of MIAC and IAI was possible after broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment in a substantial number of women with PTL. This emphasizes the importance of performing amniocentesis for this indication in women with PTL with early onset of symptoms. Another strength of this study was that we characterized Lactobacillus spp. by both 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing and specific quantitative PCR.

Although one of the limitations was the high rate of antibiotics administered in the entire study group (approximately 30% women were treated with antibiotics prior to vaginal sampling), we took into consideration this variable in our regression models. Finally, we acknowledge we did not characterize AF microbiota composition by 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing. However, to identify microorganisms in the AF, we performed not only specific culture media but also Sanger sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene.

From a clinical perspective, directions for future research should evaluate in larger cohort of women with PTL, the diagnostic performance of vaginal bacterial load of Lactobacillus spp. as a non-invasive marker of the intra-uterine environment.

In conclusion, we observed a reduced Lactobacillus load in women exposed to IAI, in those with an early gestational age at delivery or a short latency from vaginal sampling to delivery and found microbial-diversity and Lactobacillus spp. depletion to be associated with subsequent clinical chorioamnionitis.

Methods

Study design

From an observational cohort study (2008–2016) performed in women with PTL <34 weeks who had undergone amniocentesis to rule out IAI and with vaginal fluid collected, we selected 69 consecutive women. These women were admitted to the Department of Maternal-fetal Medicine at the Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.

Women with clinical signs of chorioamnionitis at admission, multiple gestation, PPROM, women who did not consent to participate in the study and those in whom amniocentesis was not technically possible were not eligible for this study.

Patient selection and sampling procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable local regulatory requirements after approval from the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (HCB/2010/5811; HCB/2017/0821). Written informed consents were obtained from all subjects.

Clinical definitions and management

Gestational age was established according to the first-trimester ultrasound scan.

The definition of PTL and antenatal management has been reported previously23,24. Briefly, the standard antenatal management of women with PTL included lung maturation with a complete course of antenatal steroids (betamethasone 12-mg intramuscular injection with two doses given 24 hours apart) at between 24.0 to 34.6 weeks. Tocolysis (nifedipine or atosiban) was considered to complete maturation with steroids in the absence of clinical chorioamnionitis, placenta abruption or non-reassuring fetal status. In women with a diagnosis of MIAC tocolysis was discontinued. Regarding antibiotic treatment, women with AF glucose levels <5 mg/dL and/or with microorganisms determined by Gram staining and/or positive cultures were treated with parenteral antibiotics during 10 days according to the antibiogram of the microorganism isolated. Prophylactic antibiotics were also considered (endovenous ampicillin 1 g/6 h, endovenous gentamycin 80 mg/8 h and oral azithromycin 1 g) in women with advanced cervical dilatation (Bishop index ≥6) until AF culture results were obtained. In case of negative cultures, prophylactic antibiotic treatment was discontinued. From 2011 onwards, magnesium sulfate was administered for fetal neuroprotection between 24.0 and 32.0 weeks if imminent labor was suspected.

Clinical chorioamnionitis was defined based on the criteria of Gibbs et al.25.

Amniotic fluid and vaginal fluid collection

Amniotic fluid (AF) was obtained by transabdominal amniocentesis at admission and kept at 4 °C until processing.

Vaginal fluid was collected using swabs (Cytobrush Plus GT; Medscan Medical AB) from the posterior vaginal fornix immediately after amniocentesis or within 24 h. Each Cytobrush was submerged in 1.0 mL of sodium chloride (NaCl) (9 mg/mL) and kept at 4 °C until processing. Vaginal fluid was centrifuged at 3000 g at 4 °C for 10 minutes and pellet was stored at −80 °C until analysis.

Diagnosis of IAI and MIAC

In all samples, we measured the level of IL-6 in AF by enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) (Biosource; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), previously centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C. The minimum detectable level of IL-6 was 0.2 ng/mL. We defined IAI according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of IL-6 (expressed in a log scale) previously employed by our group4,23,26 and similar to that reported by Romero et al.27.

MIAC was defined by the presence of a positive AF culture for bacteria (chocolate agar for aerobes, Schaedler agar for anaerobes and thioglycollate broth) and for Ureaplasma spp. or Mycoplasma hominis (Mycoplasma IST 2, bioMérieux). All samples were further analyzed by specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene using the primers: 5′- AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG - 3′ and 5′- GGA CTA CCA GGG TAT CTA AT - 3′ followed by Sanger sequencing in the Department of Microbiology. Sequences were identified using the Blast algorithm in the NCBI database, with minimum 98% sequence identity.

DNA extraction, 16s ribosomal RNA gene amplification and sequencing

DNA extraction from the vaginal swabs was performed using the Purelink Microbiome DNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentrations were measured using a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technology, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

The 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing library was constructed following the 16S rDNA gene Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation Illumina protocol, targeting the V3 and V4 hypervariable regions. After 16S rDNA gene amplification, the mutiplexing step was performed using the Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina, Inc.). The libraries were sequenced using a 2 × 300pb paired-end run (MiSeq Reagent kit v3 (Illumina, Inc.)) on a MiSeq Sequencer according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, Inc.).

Data and statistical analysis

Quality assessment was performed with the use of the prinseq-lite program28 (min_length: 50; trim_qual_right: 30; trim_qual_type: mean; trim_qual_window: 20). Forward and reverse reads were joined using FLASH program29 applying default parameters.

Chimeric sequences were removed using the UCHIME program version 4.2. Open reference OTU picking was performed at 97% identity and were classified using the RDP algorithm30 in combination with the RDP database version 11.

Samples with less than 1,000 sequence reads were removed. Singletons and OTUs with a relative frequency <0.01% were also removed. A maximum of 3,000 taxa were included. Sequences classified as Cyanobacteria and/or Chloroplasts were removed.

OTU tables were rarefied to 8,054 sequences per sample to avoid variations in sequencing depth. To assess alpha-diversity, richness (Chao1 and ACE indexes) and microbial-diversity (Shannon and Simpson indexes) were computed at genus and OTU levels. Beta-diversity using weighted and unweighted UNIFRAC (phylogenetic distance) and Bray Curtis distance (non-phylogenetic) were used as input for ordination analysis using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). The Calypso software version 8.24 (http://cgenome.net/calypso/) was used for data mining and multivariate analysis. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was used to detect unique biomarkers (linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score >3.0) in relative abundance of bacterial taxonomy31.

Bacterial load of Lactobacillus spp. by quantitative PCR

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) amplification and detection were performed with specific primers targeted to the 16S region for Lactobacillus spp.32 and a specific toxin from Lactobacillus iners33 in each vaginal sample. Each reaction mixture of 20 μl was composed of KAPA Sybr Fast qPCR Kit (KAPA Biosistems), 0.4 μl of each primer (10 μM concentration) and 1 μl of template DNA in a Light Cycler 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Technologies). All amplifications were performed in duplicates. The bacterial concentration in each sample was calculated by comparison with the Ct values obtained from a standard curve and also, a negative control was included in each reaction plate. These were generated using serial 10-fold dilutions of gene.

Data was normalized for total DNA concentrations (ng/μL) and presented in a logarithmic scale (log number copies gene/ng total DNA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of demographic data and pregnancy outcomes were performed using the SPSS 20.0 for MAC OS (IBM Corporation, USA). The normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test and the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables were presented as median (25th, 75th percentile). Categorical variables were presented as numbers or percentages (%). The association of vaginal microbial-diversity and bacterial load of Lactobacillus spp. (expressed as log n copies gene/ng total DNA) to predict different outcomes was evaluated using linear and logistic regression analysis. Regression models took into consideration whether antibiotic was administered prior vaginal sampling. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was employed to display the relationship between sensitivity and the false-positive rate (1 – specificity) of bacterial load of Lactobacillus spp. for diagnosing sPTB <34 weeks.

All differences were considered statistically significant with a p < 0.05 with two-sided alternative hypotheses.

Supplementary information

Supplemental S1 (2.5MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This project has been funded with support of the: - Project PI15/00344, that belongs to the Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013–2016 co-funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III Subdirección General de Evaluación y el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), “Una manera de hacer Europa”. - Erasmus + Programme of the European Union (Framework Agreement number: 2013–0040). This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Universitat de Barcelona (CRAI Oficina de Difusió del Coneixement) provided funding assintance to cover Open Access Article Processing Charges.

Author contributions

T.C., J.B., A.V., E.G. conceived the study. T.C., E.H., A.B.S.-G., R.L.-P. and J.P. collected the data. T.C., E.H., M.C.C. and C.C.-P. analyzed the data. T.C., A.V., M.C.C., J.B. and C.C.-P. drafted the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-55611-y.

References

  • 1.Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Global burden of prematurity. Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine. 2016;21:74–79. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Combs CA, et al. Amniotic fluid infection, inflammation, and colonization in preterm labor with intact membranes. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;210:125 e121–125 e115. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Romero R, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. American journal of reproductive immunology. 2014;72:458–474. doi: 10.1111/aji.12296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Palacio M, et al. Cervical length and gestational age at admission as predictors of intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm labor with intact membranes. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;34:441–447. doi: 10.1002/uog.6437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Romero R, et al. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in preterm labor with intact membranes and preterm PROM: a study of the alarmin HMGB1. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2011;24:1444–1455. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.591460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moreno I, et al. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2016;215:684–703. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eastment MC, McClelland RS. Vaginal microbiota and susceptibility to HIV. Aids. 2018;32:687–698. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mitra A, et al. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: what do we know and where are we going next? Microbiome. 2016;4:58. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0203-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN. The Human Microbiome during Bacterial Vaginosis. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2016;29:223–238. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00075-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hillier SL, et al. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. The New England journal of medicine. 1995;333:1737–1742. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512283332604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hitti J, et al. Vaginal indicators of amniotic fluid infection in preterm labor. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2001;97:211–219. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01146-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kacerovsky M, et al. Cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. PloS one. 2015;10:e0126884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kindinger LM, et al. The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk. Microbiome. 2017;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Petricevic L, et al. Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery. Scientific reports. 2014;4:5136. doi: 10.1038/srep05136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.DiGiulio DB, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of the human microbiota during pregnancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112:11060–11065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502875112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cobo Teresa, Kacerovsky Marian, Jacobsson Bo. Noninvasive Sampling of the Intrauterine Environment in Women with Preterm Labor and Intact Membranes. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2017;43(4):241–249. doi: 10.1159/000480232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Witkin SS, Linhares IM. Why do lactobacilli dominate the human vaginal microbiota? BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2017;124:606–611. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fettweis JM, et al. The vaginal microbiome and preterm birth. Nature medicine. 2019;25:1012–1021. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0450-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Russo R, Karadja E, De Seta F. Evidence-based mixture containing Lactobacillus strains and lactoferrin to prevent recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised clinical trial. Beneficial microbes. 2019;10:19–26. doi: 10.3920/BM2018.0075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brown RG, et al. Vaginal dysbiosis increases risk of preterm fetal membrane rupture, neonatal sepsis and is exacerbated by erythromycin. BMC medicine. 2018;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0999-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paramel Jayaprakash T, et al. High Diversity and Variability in the Vaginal Microbiome in Women following Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM): A Prospective Cohort Study. PloS one. 2016;11:e0166794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yoon Bo Hyun, Romero Roberto, Park Jee Yoon, Oh Kyung Joon, Lee JoonHo, Conde-Agudelo Agustin, Hong Joon-Seok. Antibiotic administration can eradicate intra-amniotic infection or intra-amniotic inflammation in a subset of patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;221(2):142.e1-142.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cobo T, et al. Impact of microbial invasion of amniotic cavity and the type of microorganisms on short-term neonatal outcome in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2017;96:570–579. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Palacio M, et al. The use of a variable cut-off value of cervical length in women admitted for preterm labor before and after 32 weeks. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;29:421–426. doi: 10.1002/uog.3950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gibbs RS, Blanco JD, St Clair PJ, Castaneda YS. Quantitative bacteriology of amniotic fluid from women with clinical intraamniotic infection at term. J Infect Dis. 1982;145:1–8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/145.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cobo T, et al. Predictive value of combined amniotic fluid proteomic biomarkers and interleukin-6 in preterm labor with intact membranes. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;200:499 e491–496. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Romero R, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of amniotic fluid white blood cell count, glucose, interleukin-6, and gram stain in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1993;169:805–816. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:863–864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Magoc T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2007;73:5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Segata N, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome biology. 2011;12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heilig HG, et al. Molecular diversity of Lactobacillus spp. and other lactic acid bacteria in the human intestine as determined by specific amplification of 16S ribosomal DNA. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2002;68:114–123. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.1.114-123.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rampersaud R, et al. Inerolysin, a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin produced by Lactobacillus iners. Journal of bacteriology. 2011;193:1034–1041. doi: 10.1128/JB.00694-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental S1 (2.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES