Abstract
Background:
Klebsiella pneumonia is one of the common causes of pneumonia and bacteremia in intensive care patients. The present study was aimed to determine the capability of (GTG) 5-PCR assay for molecular typing of K. pneumonia strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infections.
Methods:
In this descriptive-sectional study, K. pneumoniae strains were collected from hospitalized patients with urinary tract infection in Baqiyatallah Hospital, Tehran, Iran during 2017–2018. Isolates were identified by conventional microbiological tests. Bacterial DNA was extracted using boiling method and (GTG) 5-PCR assay was used for subtyping of the isolates. For clustering of isolates, dendrogram was generated according to the un-weighted pair group method with arithmetic (UPGMA).
Results:
Overall, 88 K. pneumoniae isolates were isolated and subjected to the molecular typing study. The (GTG) 5–PCR assay was able to differentiate the K. pneumoniae strains into 9 clusters including G1–G9. Genotype clusters G4 and G9 consist of highest (26) and lowest (1) number isolate, respectively.
Conclusion:
The K. pneumonia strains isolated under the study belonged to various clones and the (GTG) 5-PCR assay as simple and rapid method can be a powerful tool for molecular typing of K. pneumoniae strains.
Keywords: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Molecular typing, (GTG) 5-PCR assay
Introduction
Klebsiella pneumoniae belongs to enterobacteriaceae family, is a Gram-negative nosocomial pathogen which leads to many infections including pneumonia, bacteremia and urinary tract infections usually in the patients with underlying disease such as diabetes mellitus (1, 2). The organism is important because of its ability to produce many enzymes which destroy extended spectrum of antimicrobial agents. From these, K. pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) are important β-lactamases and hydrolyze cephalosporins, penicillin, carbapenems and monobactams (3, 4). Infections due to KPCs- positive K. pneumoniae have a high mortality rate in compare with those caused by carbapenems susceptible isolates (5, 6). Other β-lactamases are also produced by species including OXA, TEM, SHV and CTX-M (7, 8). The treatment of K. pneumoniae infections are more complicated and in the many cases, it will be ineffective (9).
The different genotypes of K. pneumoniae have different susceptibility or resistance profiles to antimicrobial agents (10). Besides, finding the source of nosocomial infections resulted from K. pneumoniae can be helpful in management of outbreaks. Molecular genotyping is a useful approach for identifying probable sources of infections by determining bacterial genetic profiles (11). Moreover, identification of bacteria with genotypic methods lead to better identifying some features of bacteria, including increased virulence and transmissibility (12).
Several genotyping methods have been introduced from a long time ago, totally classified into two groups based on PCR and enzymatic digestion methods. The PCR based assays are also depending on the sequencing or randomly amplified patterns analysis. Random PCRs methods are simple and cost-effective and easily can apply to many microorganisms (13).
(GTG) 5-PCR fingerprint approach is a novel genotyping method and performs with a single poly-trinucleotide (GTG) primer targeting a conserved and repetitive poly GTG sequences present in bacterial genomes. The assay effectiveness has been deemed acceptable in compare with other molecular typing analysis (14).
We aimed to determine the genetic diversity of K. pneumoniae isolates using (GTG) 5-PCR molecular typing technique.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Isolates
The study included all K. pneumoniae isolates recovered from urinary tract infections of patients hospitalized in Baqiatallah Hospital, Tehran, Iran during 2017–2018. These isolates were identified by standard biochemical tests.
The study (No.91002360) was approved by the Ethics Committee of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences.
DNA extraction
DNA extraction carried out using method described previously with some modifications (15).
All isolates were cultured on LB broth (Merk, Germany) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Following overnight incubation, each of bacterial suspensions was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min and bacterial sediments suspended in 250 μl of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5% [v/v] Triton X100, pH 8.0). The suspensions were separately boiled at 100 °C for 3 min and centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were transferred into sterile microtubes and about 250 μl of ethanol 95% added to each microtube, incubated at −20 °C for 30 min. Following centrifugation at 14000 rpm for 20 min, the sediments were dissolved in 100 μl sterile distilled water and stored at −20°C. Quality of DNA was evaluated using gel agarose electrophoresis.
(GTG) 5-PCR assay and PCR pattern analysis
(GTG) 5-PCR was used for subtyping of the strains. The amplification reaction was carried out in a total volume of 25 μl containing 1.0 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Dongsheng Biotech, Guangzhou, China), 1.0 nM of primer (5'GTGGTGGTGGTGGTG3'), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, and 40 ng of genomic DNA. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 60 s, annealing at 52 °C for 60 s, and extension at 72 °C for 5 min; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR amplicons were electrophoresed on gel aga-rose 1%, stained with DNA safe stain (Cinaclone, Iran) and finally visualized under UV light transilluminator (Fotodyne, USA).
Genetic relationships among K. pneumoniae isolates were analyzed using GelCompar II version 5.10 with unweighted pair group method with arithmetic (UPGMA) clustering method.
Results
Overall, 88 K. pneumoniae isolates were isolated from patients' specimens and subjected to genotypic analysis. The PCR with the (GTG) 5 oligonucleotide yielded the fingerprints with band numbers ranging from 15 to 20, approximately (Fig. 1). An amplicon with size of 900bp was amplified in the all of isolates, while amplicons with size of 900 and 1000bp just observed in some isolates.
Fig. 1:

The (GTG) PCR fingerprints of several K. pneumoniae isolates (20–26)
All of isolates were successfully genotyped by (GTG) 5-PCR and classified in 9 clusters (G1–G9) with similarity level of 70% (Fig.2). The number of isolates in each genotype were as follow; G1(10), G2(8), G3(22), G4(1), G5(3), G6(26), G7(9), G8(4) and G9(5).
Fig. 2:
Dendrogram based on (GTG)5-PCR fingerprints derived from 19 K. pneumoniae clinical isolates. Comparison method: Dice Clustering method: UPGMA
Discussion
Klebsiella genus is one of the most important Gram-negative opportunistic bacterium that causes severe diseases such as septicemia, pneumonia and urinary tract infections (16). Because of the increasing of the antibiotic-resistant Klebsiella in the hospital environments, the identification of contamination sources is important (17). Biochemical typing, such as the AP-20E, is ineffective in clinical microbiology laboratories due to the similarities of several species biochemical profiles (18–20). In recent decade, molecular typing is increasing in microbiology laboratories. From many molecular typing methods for bacterial fingerprinting, PCR based assays are easy and cost-effective methods with reliable discrimination. These assays require just a low amount of DNA which may be so low in some conditions such as DNA extraction from biopsy specimens. Some experiments have been done represented similar results. (GTG) 5-PCR fingerprinting is a rapid and effective method to identification of bacteria.
In compared to other assays, the (GTG) 5-PCR analysis appears to be a hopeful molecular typing method and it has so ability to differentiate many strains within K. pneumoniae species (14). Reproducibility of (GTG)5-PCR assay seems to be reliable in compare with other rep-PCR fingerprinting (16). The (GTG)5-PCR was able to characterize all strains belonging to each enterococcal species into separated clusters, successfully (17).
This fingerprinting method has already been applied effectively in genotyping of several bacterial species (18). In another study, (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting was found to be a rapid and reproducible genotypic method for genotyping of lactobacilli and Streptococcus mutans (21, 22). This method can be useful to determine the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationship among acetic acid bacteria (23).
In the (GTG) 5-PCR assay, the number of bands in fingerprints is usually between 8 and 15 and can be variable in different bacterial species (20). However, in our experiment the number of bands in the fingerprints obtained to be 15–20. The (GTG) 5-PCR assay produce band numbers from 10 to 25 and in comparison with other molecular typing methods such as ERIC-PCR, ERIC2-PCR, BOX-PCR and REP-PCR methods, it had a highest Simpson discrimination index (93.68%) (19). There are several factors that can be affect the fingerprints band numbers such as agarose percentage in gel electrophoresis system so that an electrophoretic system with high percent of agarose can better separate and visualize more amplicons (24).
In comparison with lactic bacteria, the number of bands in (GTG) 5-PCR fingerprints is low in the staphylococci. The low number bands in fingerprints can be discriminative in small genomic variations and can be considered as advantage for GTG) 5-PCR assay (25).
Conclusion
The (GTG) 5 -PCR analysis provides a promising tool for molecular typing of K. pneumoniae isolates.
Ethical considerations
Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the “Clinical Research Development Center of Baqiyatallah hospital” for their kind cooperation. This study was financially supported in part by “Clinical Research Development Center of Baqiyatallah Hospital”.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Mancini S, Poirel L, Corthesy M, et al. (2018). Klebsiella pneumoniae co-producing KPC and RmtG, finally targeting Switzerland. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,90(2):151–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shakib P, Ghafourian S, Zolfaghary MR, et al. (2012). Prevalence of OmpK35 and OmpK36 porin expression in beta-lactamase and non-betalactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Biologics,6:1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Munoz-Price LS, Poirel L, Bonomo RA, et al. (2013). Clinical epidemiology of the global expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Lancet Infect Dis,13(9):785–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ghafourian S, bin Sekawi Z, Sadeghifard N, et al. (2011). The prevalence of ESBLs producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in some major hospitals, Iran. Open Microbiol J,5:91–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ranjbar R, Memariani H, Sorouri R, et al. (2016). Distribution of virulence genes and genotyping of CTX-M-15-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients with community-acquired urinary tract infection (CA-UTI). Microb Pathog,100:244–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Patel G, Huprikar S, Factor SH, et al. (2008). Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and the impact of antimicrobial and adjunctive therapies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,29(12):1099–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ranjbar R, Izadi M, Hafshejani TT, et al. (2016). Molecular detection and antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae from house flies (Musca domestica) in kitchens, farms, hospitals and slaughterhouses. J Infect Public Health,9(4):499–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Coque TM, Oliver A, Pérez-Díaz JC, et al. (2002). Genes encoding TEM-4, SHV-2, and CTXM-10 extended-spectrum β-lactamases are carried by multiple Klebsiella pneumoniae clones in a single hospital (Madrid, 1989 to 2000). Antimicrob Agents Chemother,46(2):500–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee GC, Burgess DS. (2012). Treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) infections: a review of published case series and case reports. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob,11(1):32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aktaş Z, Kayacan ÇB, Schneider I, et al. (2008). Carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinase, OXA-48, persists in Klebsiella pneumoniae in Istanbul, Turkey. Chemotherapy,54(2):101–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang S, Yang G, Ye Q, et al. (2018). Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated From Retail Foods in China. Front Microbiol,9:289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yıldırım İH, Yıldırım SC, Koçak N. (2011). Molecular methods for bacterial genotyping and analyzed gene regions. J Microbiol Infect Dis,1(1):42–6. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sultana S, Islam MN, Hoque ME. (2018). DNA fingerprinting and molecular diversity analysis for the improvement of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) cultivars. J Adv Biotechnol Exp Ther, 1(1): 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ryberg A, Olsson C, Ahrné S, et al. (2011). Comparison of (GTG) 5-oligonucleotide and ribosomal intergenic transcribed spacer (ITS)-PCR for molecular typing of Klebsiella isolates. J Microbiol Methods,84(2):183–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hassanzadeh S, Pourmand MR, Afshar D, et al. (2016). TENT: A Rapid DNA Extraction Method of Staphylococcus aureus. Iran J Public Health,45(8):1093–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sechi LA, Zanetti S, Dupré I, et al. (1998). Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequences as molecular targets for typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. J Clin Microbiol, 36(1):128–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Švec P, Pantůček R, Petráš P, et al. (2010). Identification of Staphylococcus spp. using (GTG) 5-PCR fingerprinting. Syst Appl Microbiol,33(8):451–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.De Vuyst L, Camu N, De Winter T, et al. (2008). Validation of the (GTG) 5-rep-PCR fingerprinting technique for rapid classification and identification of acetic acid bacteria, with a focus on isolates from Ghanaian fermented cocoa beans. Int J Food Microbiol,125(1):79–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mohapatra BR, Broersma K, Mazumder A. (2008). Differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from poultry and free-living birds by (GTG) 5-PCR genomic fingerprinting. Int J Med Microbiol,298(3–4):245–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Versalovic J, Schneider M, De Bruijn F, et al. (1994). Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol Cell Biol,5(1):25–40. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gevers D, Huys G, Swings J. (2001). Applicability of rep-PCR fingerprinting for identification of Lactobacillus species. FEMS Microbiol Lett,205(1):31–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Švec P, Nováková D, Žáčková L, et al. (2008). Evaluation of (GTG) 5-PCR for rapid identification of Streptococcus mutans. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 94(4):573–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Papalexandratou Z, Cleenwerck I, De Vos P, et al. (2009). (GTG) 5-PCR reference framework for acetic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 301(1):44–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rasschaert G, Houf K, Imberechts H, et al. (2005). Comparison of five repetitive-sequence-based PCR typing methods for molecular discrimination of Salmonella enterica isolates. J Clin Microbiol,43(8):3615–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Braem G, De Vliegher S, Supré K, et al. (2011). (GTG) 5-PCR fingerprinting for the classification and identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species from bovine milk and teat apices: A comparison of type strains and field isolates. Vet Microbiol,147(1–2):67–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


