Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics logoLink to Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
. 2019 Nov 5;20(12):169–179. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12754

A suggested method for setting up GSI profiles on the GE Revolution CT scanner

David M Gauntt 1,
PMCID: PMC6909110  PMID: 31833643

Abstract

“GSI Assist” is the automatic exposure control (AEC) system for dual‐energy acquisitions on the GE Revolution CT scanner. This paper describes the user options of GSI Assist, and describes the method developed at UAB Medical Center to simplify the use of GSI Assist without adversely affecting the AEC Operation.

Keywords: computed tomography, CT AEC, CT protocols, dual energy CT, GSI assist

1. Introduction

CT automatic exposure control (AEC) is commonly used for chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT exams. AEC systems adjust the tube current (and on some systems the tube voltage1, 2, 3) to accommodate differences in patient size, both from patient to patient and within a single patient acquisition, in order to simplify the task of obtaining adequate image quality without the use of excessive radiation dose.4, 5

Dual‐energy scanners acquire two independent sets of attenuation data with different energy‐dependent characteristics. Dual energy General Electric Revolution CT scanners accomplish this by changing the tube voltage from one x‐ray pulse to the next at a rate of more than 1000 pulses per second.6 The tube current may vary from exam to exam, but the high‐energy and low‐energy tube currents are each fixed during a single exam, and the tube voltages do not vary from exam to exam.

1.1. Overview of CT automatic exposure control

Most modern scanners have AEC systems. These systems use localizer views to determine the patient size, and then adjust the tube current accordingly, using higher currents for larger patients and lower currents for smaller patients. AEC systems usually also have tube current modulation options.7 Longitudinal modulation (or z‐modulation) adjusts the tube current as the patient thickness changes along the length of the patient. Angular modulation (or rotational modulation) uses higher tube currents for lateral views and lower tube currents for anterior/posterior views; this allows for a reduction in noise without increasing patient dose. A variation on angular modulation uses a lower tube current when the tube is anterior to the patient, and a higher tube current when posterior. This lowers patient dose to the front of the body, where most radiosensitive organs are located, without increasing image noise.8

1.2. Automatic exposure control in GE Revolution scanners

1.2.1. Single voltage mode

On the Revolution scanner, single voltage AEC is called “SmartMA.” In single‐voltage scans, the user chooses a setting called the “noise index,” which is part of the imaging protocol but which can be overridden by the technologist at scan time. The AEC system uses the localizer images (called “scout” images on GE scanners) to determine the patient thickness, calculates the CTDIvol required to produce primary patient images whose noise is equal to the noise index, and then calculates the tube current required to produce this CTDIvol. Since the noise is also affected by the primary image thickness and iterative reconstruction (ASIR‐V) settings of the primary reconstruction series, these settings also affect the tube current.6 However, the choice of filter kernel affects image noise but does not affect the tube current; if the primary series has a kernel other than “Standard,” the noise in the primary series will not match the noise index.

This is similar to other GE scanners, except that in the Discovery and Optima series the AEC takes the primary image thickness into account but not the ASIR setting, and the Optima series scanners have an additional setting called “Dose Reduction” which affects the dose.

1.2.2. Dual energy mode

The dual energy imaging technology used on the Revolution is called "Gemstone Spectral Imaging" (or "GSI"), and dual energy AEC on the Revolution is called “GSI Assist.”  The user selects the “target noise index” (or “target NI”), and the AEC system calculates the CTDIvol (the “target CTDIvol”) that would be used for a 120 kV single voltage acquisition without longitudinal modulation when the noise index is set equal to the target NI. The system then selects a combination of high‐voltage and low‐voltage tube currents that would produce a CTDIvol close to the target CTDIvol. According to the GSI Xtream Technology White Paper,6 the noise in the 70 keV monochromatic image matches the image noise in a dose‐matched single‐energy acquisition. Therefore, the noise in the 70 keV image should be close to the target noise index.

The low‐energy tube current and the high‐energy tube current each remain fixed throughout the acquisition; that is, neither longitudinal nor angular modulation is used. Because longitudinal modulation is not used, the system calculates a single target CTDIvol based on the patient thickness along the entire scan length.

This paper addresses the settings available to the user when setting up protocols on the Revolution, those that are available to the technologist at scan time, and the approach used at the UAB Medical Center to simplify the task of the technologist without adversely affecting image quality or radiation dose.

1.3. Details

The GSI Assist parameters are arranged in a hierarchy of groups; these groups are the “GSI Preset Family,” the “GSI Recon,” and the “GSI Profile”; this hierarchy is shown in Fig. 1. These groups are described in detail in Appendix C, but here we present an overview of each and how they are related.

  • Each Preset Family specifies the gantry rotation time, helical pitch, collimation (i.e. detector coverage), focal spot size, and scan field of view, and includes a list of available tube currents. The user is not able to define new Preset Families. Since each Preset Family allows the use of a range of tube currents, there is a range of values of CTDIvol that can be produced using the particular Preset Family. Appendix B lists the different Preset Families available on the 160 mm version of the Revolution, and the minimum and maximum values of CTDIvol associated with each Preset Family.

  • Each GSI Recon specifies reconstruction parameters for one image series. Several GSI Recons are preloaded onto the scanner, but the user can define new GSI Recons. The details of the GSI Recons are listed in Appendix C, but otherwise are beyond the scope of this paper.

  • Each GSI Profile specifies a list of Preset Families, as well as a list of GSI Recons. The first Preset Family in the list is the Primary Preset Family, and is always used unless the technologist selects a different Preset Family. Several GE GSI Profiles are preloaded onto each scanner, but the user can define new GSI Profiles.

  • A GSI Protocol is simply a CT protocol that includes one or more GSI acquisitions. Each GSI Protocol must specify a Clinical Identifier, which determines which GSI Profile to use. According to GE Medical Systems, in future releases of the software, it will be possible to specify the GSI Profile for each protocol independently of the clinical identifier.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic illustration of hierarchy of GSI settings.

1.3.1. Use of GSI Assist

When a scout view is taken as part of a clinical scan, the scanner will calculate the value of CTDIvol that would be produced by a 120 kV single‐energy acquisition that uses the target noise index. For each Preset Family in the GSI Profile, the scanner determines which of the available tube currents will produce the value of CTDIvol closest to the target CTDIvol. If the technologist takes no action, the primary Preset Family will be used even if use of another Preset Family would produce a CTDIvol closer to the target CTDIvol. Increasing the number of Preset Families in a GSI Profile can allow the technologist to match the target CTDIvol more closely, or can increase the range of values of CTDIvol available to the technologist.

This effect is illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3; these illustrate one Reference Profile (GE Routine Abdomen Contrast) and one User Profile (UAB LIVER). Chart (a) in each figure shows the Preset Families and the values of CTDIvol each can produce. Each row represents the values of CTDIvol that can be produced using a single Preset Family; the top row is the primary Preset Family. Thus, the only values of CTDIvol that can be produced using this GSI Profile are the discrete values represented in chart (a). Chart (b) presents the fractional difference between any target CTDIvol and the closest value of CTDIvol that can be produced using this GSI Profile, calculated as

fCTDIvoltarget=CTDIvoltarget-CTDIvolactualCTDIvoltarget
Figure 2.

Figure 2

Illustration of the “GE Routine Abdomen Contrast” Reference profile. (a) The values of CTDIvol that can be produced by each Preset Family in the profile. (b) Illustration of the precision with which the system can match any target CTDIvol when using this profile.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Illustration of the “UAB LIVER” User Profile. (a) The values of CTDIvol that can be produced by each of the three Preset Families in this profile. (b) Illustration of the precision with which the system can match any target CTDIvol when using this profile.

This is a measure of how closely these values can be matched to a target CTDIvol.

The GE Reference Profiles were designed to give the technologist maximum flexibility in selecting the rotation time and helical pitch within certain constraints imposed by clinical considerations. Because the “GE Routine Abdomen Contrast” profile includes many more Preset Families than the “UAB LIVER” profile, there are many more combinations of tube current, rotation time, and helical pitch available, and therefore the target CTDIvol can generally be more closely matched by the technologist. On the other hand, because the “UAB LIVER” profile includes a Preset Family that can produce CTDIvol values down to 4 mGy, a wider range of target CTDIs can be matched than with the reference profile. In addition, the reduced number of options available to the technologist using the “UAB LIVER” profile simplifies the task of selecting the Preset Family.

1.3.2. User interface

After the scout view is taken, the scanner displays the scout image (Fig. 4) and the GSI Image Quality widget dialog (Fig. 5). The IQ widget displays both the target noise index, and the “average projected noise index” (AvgPNI), which is an estimate of the image noise averaged over the scan length if the presently selected Preset Family is used. When the IQ widget first appears, the AvgPNI for the primary Preset Family is displayed.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Scout view for GSI scan of chest phantom. The orange lines indicate the anatomy for which the predicted image noise will be above the prescribed noise index.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The GSI IQ widget for the scan of Fig. 4. The widget shows the expected image noise in a 70 keV image (“Average Projected NI”) and the target noise index (“Noise index”). The Average Projected NI is displayed in orange when it is higher than the Prescribed NI. The technologist can click on the “Adjust” button to change the selected Preset Family, and thus the Average Project Noise Index.

The parts of the anatomy for which the projected noise is above the Prescribed NI are indicated by orange, as in Fig. 4. If the AvgPNI is above the Prescribed NI, it will be displayed in orange in the GSI widget as in Fig. 5.

If the projected noise is below the Prescribed NI for the entire scan, no orange sidebars are displayed (Fig. 6). Whenever the Average Projected NI is equal to or below the target Noise Index, it will be displayed in blue (Fig. 7).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The scout view of the same scan after selecting the “Large Body/80 mm/L/1.0 s/0.508:1” scan settings. Because the projected noise is below the Prescribed NI for the entire scan, no orange sidebars are present.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The GSI IQ widget for the same scan settings as Fig. 10. Since the Average Projected NI is below the Prescribed NI, it is displayed in blue. In this case, the radiation dose is higher than desired.

As longitudinal tube current modulation is not used in GSI acquisitions, whenever the Average Projected NI is close to the Prescribed NI (Fig. 8), the projected noise is likely to be above the Prescribed NI for part of the scan. In this case, orange sidebars run along parts of the scout (Fig. 9).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

The GSI IQ widget for the same scan settings as Fig. 9.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

The scout view of the same scan after selecting the “Large Body/80 mm/L/0.8 s/0.992:1” scan settings. When the Average Projected NI is close to the Prescribed NI, orange sidebars are typically present for part of the scan.

The technologist has the option of changing the Preset Family selection by clicking on the “Adjust” button. The scanner will then display a Solutions dialog box (Fig. 10) listing each of the GSI Preset Families in the GSI Profile, as well as the projected noise index (PNI) and the CTDIvol for the tube current selected for each Preset Family. The technologist may select any one of these Preset Families, overriding the present selection.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

GSI Image Quality widget after clicking on the “Adjust” button (“Solutions window”). This display allows the technologist to change the Preset Family (“Scan Settings”). A yellow mA (not shown here) would indicate that the maximum tube current has been reduced to avoid tube overheating; an orange PNI indicates that the projected CTDIvol is above the target CTDIvol.

The number of options available in this dialog box can be substantial. There will be one row of data for each GSI Preset Family in the GSI Profile; for the GE Reference Profiles, this can be as few as three rows and as many as nine rows.

If the CID Link setting is turned on, the Clinical Identifier determines which GSI profile to use. If the CID Link setting for a GSI acquisition is turned off, the GSI Profile may be selected manually.

The goal of the method presented below is to design a set of GSI Profiles that

  1. Allows the physicist to give the technologist simple, clear instructions on when to change the GSI Preset Family, and which GSI Preset Family to select, and

  2. Makes available the widest possible range of CTDIvol values, to ensure that the system does not produce excessively noisy images of large patients or use excessive radiation dose on small patients.

2. Method

At UAB Medical Center, we created User Profiles that contain only three GSI Preset Families per profile, one for small, one for medium, and one for large patients. The medium Preset Family is specified as the primary Preset Family.

For example, the Preset Families in the “UAB LIVER” profile are listed in Table 1, along with the minimum and maximum values of CTDIvol that can be produced with each Preset Family. With these settings, the scanner can perform acquisitions that match the target CTDIvol to within ±5% over most of the range 3.6 to 44.6 mGy.

Table 1.

“UAB LIVER” GSI protocol.

Patient size SFOV, focal spot, collimation Pitch Rot time (s) Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1.375 0.5 3.6 8.6
Medium (primary) Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.992 0.8 7.3 18.6
Large Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.508 1.0 17.4 44.6

Although the Preset Families in this table are listed in order of increasing CTDIvol, on the scanner the Medium Preset Family is listed first in order to identify it as the primary Preset Family.

We have instructed the technologists to use the primary Preset Family unless the PNI is more than 2 HU below or above the target noise index (the noise index represents the target noise in the CT number, so the noise index has units of HU). For a target noise index of 18, a difference of 2 HU in the noise index is 11%, which corresponds to a 22% mismatch in the CTDIvol. A change in the CTDI of less than ~25% does not result in a noticeable change in the noise,9 so this difference is not clinically significant.

If the PNI is more than 2 HU below the target noise index, the “Adjust” tool is used to select the “Small adult” Preset Family. If the PNI more than 2 HU above the target noise index, the “Adjust” tool is used to select the “Large Adult” preset.

2.1. Suggested approach to customizing GSI Protocols

The following approach can be used to customize GSI profiles to accommodate the needs of a specific facility for a specific type of exam. The goal of this procedure is to select three or four Preset Families whose CTDIvol values overlap, but with as little overlap as possible. This allows a wide range of possible CTDIvol values with few Preset Families, and thus simplifies the selection of Preset Family.

This procedure makes use of the tables in Appendix B. Each table in this Appendix describes Preset Families for a single combination of scan field of view and collimation. Each row of each table describes a single Preset Family. Each Preset Family includes multiple mA settings covering a range of values of CTDIvol, so there is a minimum and a maximum value of CTDIvol listed. The rows are listed in order of increasing minimum CTDIvol.

  1. Based on clinical considerations, determine the desired scan field of view, collimation, and the range of acceptable gantry rotation times and acceptable helical pitches.

  2. Determine if use of the XLarge focal spot is acceptable; using this focal spot may reduce spatial resolution9 but allows higher tube currents and thus higher CTDIvol.

  3. Find the table in Appendix B for the desired scan field of view and collimation.

  4. Find the first Preset Family in the table that matches the restrictions on rotation time and helical pitch; this will be the “Small Patient” Preset Family.

  5. Find the last Preset Family that

    1. uses the large focal spot

    2. matches the restrictions on rotation time and helical pitch, and

    3. has a minimum CTDIvol that is less than the maximum CTDIvol of the “Small Patient” Preset Family.

    This will be the “Medium Patient” Preset Family.

  6. Find the last Preset Family that

    1. uses the large focal spot

    2. matches the restrictions on rotation time and helical pitch, and

    3. has a minimum CTDIvol that is less than the maximum CTDIvol of the “Medium Patient” Preset Family.

    This will be the “Large Patient” Preset Family.

  7. Find the Preset Family with the highest CTDIvol that matches the restrictions on rotation time, helical pitch, and focal spot size. This will be the “Extra Large Patient” Preset Family. This may be the same as the “Large Patient” Preset Family; in this case the profile will have only three Preset Families.

  8. Open the GSI Profile Editor, make a copy of an existing GE Reference Profile that contains the GSI Recons that you wish to use, and save it as a new User Profile.

  9. Replace the Preset Families in the new User Profile with the Preset Families selected above. Place the “Medium Patient” Preset Family at the top of the list, identifying it as the primary Preset Family.

  10. (Optional) Add or delete GSI Recons to the new User Profile as desired.

In selecting the Preset Families to include in a profile, consider the following6:

  1. It has been observed in the GE Discovery scanners that material decomposition values are more accurate for low‐current, long rotation time combinations than at high‐current, short rotation time combinations.10 This is likely because for short rotation times, the time spent switching between tube voltages is a higher fraction of the total rotation time, reducing the accuracy of the acquired data. Therefore, use of longer rotation time allows more accurate material decomposition images at the expense of increased sensitivity to patient motion. This is more likely to be useful in body studies than in chest studies.

  2. The use of the Extra Large focal spot allows higher tube currents, but may degrade spatial resolution.11 This is more likely to be a problem in MSK or chest protocols than in abdominal protocols.

  3. As each Preset Family imposes a lower limit on the tube current, to achieve appropriately low radiation dose for smaller patients it may be necessary to include Preset Families with higher helical pitches. This is unlike single‐energy AEC systems, which will compensate for higher helical pitches by raising the tube current to maintain the same CTDIvol.12 However, the use of high helical pitch may introduce image artifacts.

  4. The selection of the primary Preset Family may depend on your patient population. For example, if your facility images primarily bariatric patients, use the Large Patient Preset Family as the primary family. A pediatric hospital should use the Small Patient Preset Family as the primary family.

  5. The range of available values of CTDIvol will depend on the selected constraints. For example, allowing helical pitch values ranging from 0.508 to 1.531 will allow the use of both higher and lower values of CTDIvol than available if the helical pitch is constrained to always be 0.992.

2.2. Example

Suppose that you wish to build a new GSI Profile based on the “GE Routine Abdomen Contrast” profile, using the large body field of view, 80 mm collimation, and helical pitches of no more than 1.375, and which may use the extra large focal spot.

  1. See Table B1 in Appendix B; this lists the Preset Families for the large body SFOV and 80 mm collimation.

  2. Find the first Preset Family with a helical pitch of no more than 1.375; the CTDIvol for this Preset Family ranges from 3.4 to 8.8 mGy. This is the “Small Patient” Preset Family.

  3. Find the last Preset Family that uses the large focal spot, has a helical pitch of no more than 1.375, and has a minimum CTDIvol of less than 8.8 mGy; the CTDIvol for this combination ranges from 7.1 to 18.9 mGy. This is the “Medium Patient” Preset Family.

  4. Find the last Preset Family that uses the large focal spot with a helical pitch of no more than 1.375 and a minimum CTDIvol of less than 18.9 mGy. The CTDIvol ranges from 17.2 to 45.5 mGy. This is the “Large Patient” Preset Family.

  5. Find the Preset Family with the highest maximum CTDIvol and a helical pitch of no more than 1.375. The CTDIvol ranges from 49.7 to 53.7 mGy. This is the “Extra Large Patient” Preset Family.

3. Results

Fig. 11 presents the range of CTDIvol values that can be produced with user GSI profiles that were generated using the procedure described in this paper, as well as vendor supplied abdomen and chest GSI profiles. The user GSI profiles generally allow the use both of higher CTDIvol and lower CTDIvol values than the vendor supplied profiles.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

The range of CTDIvol values that can be produced by various user GSI profiles produced with the procedure described in this paper, and by various profiles supplied by the vendor.

The user profiles shown in Fig. 11 are described in detail in Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. These profiles are all constrained to use the large body scan field of view and an 80 mm detector coverage, but have various constraints on the helical pitch and on the rotation time. Note that in these tables, the Preset Families are all listed in order of increasing CTDIvol. When installing these on a scanner, the desired primary Preset Family should be placed at the top of the list.

Table 2.

Large Body SFOV, 80 mm collimation.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.5 1.531 3.1 7.9
Medium Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1 1.375 6.3 16.8
Large Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.8 0.508 14.0 36.8
Extra large Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 1 0.508 49.7 53.7

This profile is designed for abdomen and pelvis protocols where patient motion is not an issue, so long rotation times and low pitches are acceptable.

Table 3.

Large Body SFOV, 80 mm coverage, helical pitch ≤1.375.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.5 1.375 3.4 8.8
Medium Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.8 0.992 7.1 18.9
Large Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1 0.508 17.2 45.5
Extra large Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 1 0.508 49.7 53.7

This profile is designed for abdomen and pelvis protocols, where patient motion is not an issue but there is concern about artifacts from helical pitches larger than 1.375.

Table 4.

Large Body SFOV, 80 mm coverage, helical pitch ≤ 0.992.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.5 0.992 4.7 12.2
Medium Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.6 0.508 10.9 28.4
Large Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1 0.508 17.2 45.5
Extra large Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 1 0.508 49.7 53.7

This profile is designed for abdomen and pelvis protocols, where patient motion is not an issue but there is concern about artifacts from helical pitches larger than 1.

Table 5.

Large Body SFOV, 80 mm coverage, rotation time ≤0.6 s.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.5 1.531 3.1 7.9
Medium Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.6 0.992 5.6 14.6
Large Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.6 0.508 10.9 28.4
Extra large Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.6 0.508 31.1 33.6

This profile is designed for chests protocols, where priority is given to fast scans in order to minimize motion artifacts.

Table 6.

Large Body SFOV, 80 mm coverage, rotation time ≥0.8 s.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.8 1.531 4.6 12.2
Medium Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1 0.992 8.8 23.3
Large Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1 0.508 17.2 45.5
Extra large Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 1 0.508 49.7 53.7

This profile is designed for abdomen protocols for which priority is given to quantitative pixel value accuracy.

Appendix A describes additional GSI user profiles for 40 mm detector coverage.

4. Discussion and Conclusion

The vendor supplied GSI profiles allow the scanner to match the PNI to the target noise index to within about 1%. However, the range of values of CTDIvol available to the scanner when using some profiles is relatively limited, resulting in excess radiation dose for small patients and excess noise for large patients. In addition, to achieve the full precision of the PNI, the technologist must always select the right preset profile in the Image Quality Adjust tool. Thus it may be difficult in practice to achieve this 1% match in target noise index.

The user profiles presented here produce a wider range of CTIDvol values than the vendor supplied profiles at least in part by allowing a wider range of helical pitch and rotation time values. For example, neither of the vendor supplied profiles “GE Abdomen NC” and “GE Body ArtifactRed” use a helical pitch above 0.992, and so will never produce CTDIvol values below 7.3 mGy, while the user profile “Large Body SFOV, 80 mm coverage” allows the use of a helical pitch of 1.531 with a rotation time of 0.5 s, allowing the use of acquisitions with CTDIvol as low as 3.1 mGy.

By developing and using custom GSI Profiles using the technique described here, we have managed to both simplify the technologist’s task in selecting presets and increase the range of patient sizes that can be accommodated. However, these goals are achieved by allowing larger noise index error (up to 5%) than the reference GSI profiles for some imaging conditions. We believe that deviations at this level are clinically insignificant. Over the length of an abdomen/pelvis exam, the patient size may easily change by 5 cm; this corresponds to a change in patient transmission of about a factor of 2, or a 40% change in the image noise. An error of 5% in the average noise may be considered insignificant compared to the 40% variation in image noise along the length of the scan.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Desiree Morgan, M.D, and Susan Fletcher, ASRT, of UAB Medical Center, and Scott Slavic, Holly McDaniel, Priti Madhav, and Dominic Croty of GE Medical Systems for reviewing this paper and providing useful suggestions.

APPENDIX A. Additional GSI Profiles

The following tables describe GSI profiles for 40 mm detector coverage, and for the medium body field of view.

Table A1.

Large Body SFOV, 40 mm coverage.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 1.375 3.5 9.0
Medium Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 0.984 7.4 19.4
Large Large Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.516 17.3 45.7

Table A2.

Large Body SFOV, 40 mm coverage, pitch ≤0.984.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 0.984 4.9 12.6
Medium Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.516 11.0 28.6
Large Large Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.516 17.3 45.7

Table A3.

Large Body SFOV, 40 mm coverage, rotation time ≤ 0.6 s.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 1.375 3.5 9.0
Medium Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.984 5.8 15.0
Large Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.516 11.0 28.6

Table A4.

Large Body SFOV, 40 mm coverage, rotation time ≥0.8 s.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 1.375 5.3 13.9
Medium Large Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.984 9.1 24.0
Large Large Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.516 17.3 45.7

Table A5.

Medium Body SFOV, 40 mm coverage.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 1.375 5.5 9.9
Medium Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 1.375 8.4 15.1
Large Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 0.984 11.8 21.1
Extra large Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.516 27.6 49.6

Table A6.

Medium Body SFOV, 40 mm coverage, pitch ≤0.984.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 0.984 7.8 13.8
Medium Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 0.984 11.8 21.1
Large Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.516 17.5 31.1
Extra large Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.516 27.6 49.6

Table A7.

Medium Body SFOV, 40 mm coverage, rot time ≤ 0.6 s.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 1.375 5.5 9.9
Medium Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.984 9.2 16.3
Large Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 0.516 14.8 26.3
Extra large Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.516 17.5 31.1

Table A8.

Medium Body SFOV, 40 mm coverage, rot time ≥ 0.8 s.

Patient size Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Small Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 1.375 8.4 15.1
Medium Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 0.984 11.8 21.1
Large Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.984 14.5 26.0
Extra large Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.516 27.6 49.6

APPENDIX B. GSI Preset Families

These tables list the GSI Preset Families available on the Revolution (160 mm coverage version). Each table lists the combinations for a particular collimation (NxT) and scan field of view, and is sorted in increasing order of minimum CTDIvol.

This information is based on information in Table 11 of the Revolution CT User Manual, Chapter 12.13

Table B1.

Preset families for 80 mm collimation, Large Body scan FOV.

Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.5 1.531 3.1 7.9
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.5 1.375 3.4 8.8
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.6 1.531 3.6 9.4
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.6 1.375 4.0 10.5
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.8 1.531 4.6 12.2
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.5 0.992 4.7 12.2
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.8 1.375 5.2 13.6
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.6 0.992 5.6 14.6
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1 1.531 5.7 15.1
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1 1.375 6.3 16.8
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.8 0.992 7.1 18.9
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.5 1.531 8.7 9.4
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1 0.992 8.8 23.3
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.5 0.508 9.2 23.9
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.5 1.375 9.7 10.5
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.6 1.531 10.3 11.2
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.6 0.508 10.9 28.4
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.6 1.375 11.5 12.4
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.8 1.531 13.4 14.4
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.5 0.992 13.4 14.5
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 0.8 0.508 14.0 36.8
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.8 1.375 14.9 16.1
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.6 0.992 15.9 17.2
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 1 1.531 16.5 17.8
Large Body, Large, 80 mm 1 0.508 17.2 45.5
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 1 1.375 18.3 19.9
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.8 0.992 20.6 22.3
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 1 0.992 25.4 27.5
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.5 0.508 26.1 28.3
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.6 0.508 31.1 33.6
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 0.8 0.508 40.3 43.5
Large Body, XLarge, 80 mm 1 0.508 49.7 53.7

Table B2.

Preset Families for 40 mm collimation, Large Body scan FOV.

Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 1.375 3.5 9.0
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 1.375 4.1 10.7
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 0.984 4.9 12.6
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 1.375 5.3 13.9
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.984 5.8 15.0
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 1 1.375 6.5 17.2
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 0.984 7.4 19.4
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.984 9.1 24.0
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 0.516 9.3 24.1
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.516 11.0 28.6
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 0.516 14.1 37.0
Large Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.516 17.3 45.7

Table B3.

Families for 40 mm collimation, Medium Body scan field of view.

Preset Family (Scan FOV, focal spot, coverage) Rot time (s) Pitch Min CTDIvol (mGy) Max CTDIvol (mGy)
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 1.375 5.5 9.9
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 1.375 6.6 11.7
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 0.984 7.8 13.8
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 1.375 8.4 15.1
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.984 9.2 16.3
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 1 1.375 10.4 18.6
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 0.984 11.8 21.1
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.984 14.5 26.0
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.5 0.516 14.8 26.3
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.6 0.516 17.5 31.1
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 0.8 0.516 22.4 40.2
Medium Body, Large, 40 mm 1 0.516 27.6 49.6

APPENDIX C. Details of parameter sets

GSI Preset Family

Table C1.

List of the parameters specified by a Preset Family, and the values available for each parameter. Note that the Scan FOV specifies both the scan field of view and the bowtie filter used. The user cannot define new GSI Preset Families.

Parameter Values
Scan FOV Medium Body, Large Body
Rotation time 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, or 1.0 s
Detector coverage (collimation) 20 mm (Medium Large Body) or 40 mm (Large Body only)
Helical pitch 0.516, 0.984, 1.375 (20 mm collimation) or 0.508, 0.992, 1.375, 1.531 (40 mm collimation)
Focal spot Large or Extra Large
Annotated mA 6 to 8 tube current values ranging from 185 to 570 mA

Parameters specified by a GSI Preset Family; this is a summary from Chapter 12, Section 6, Table 11 of the Revolution User’s Manual13. According to GE Medical Systems, Preset Families using the Adult Head SFOV will be added to a version of the software released late in 2018.

GSI Recon

Table C2.

List of the parameters included in a GSI Recon. The user can define custom GSI Recons. Note that other reconstruction options such as image thickness and interval are defined by the primary axial series from which the GSI Recon is built.

Parameter Values
ASIR‐V The iterative reconstruction parameter
GSI data file Select “Yes” to be able to perform GSI Data File functions in the GSI viewer
GSI image type Monoenergetic, Material decomposition, Virtual unenhanced, GSI High KVP, GSI KVP‐like
Recon type The filter kernel
KeV Used only by Monoenergetic image type. Determines the simulated photon energy
MAR Select to “Yes” to use metal artifact reduction
Window level, window width LUT parameters
MD pair Used only by the Material Decomposition image type. Describes the two basis materials

Parameters specified by a GSI Recon.

GSI Profile

Table C3.

List of the parameters included in a GSI Profile. Any GSI acquisition needs to specify the GSI Profile to use. The user can define custom GSI Profiles.

Parameter Values
Primary Preset Family The GSI Preset Family that will be used unless the user overrides this choice
Description Text description of the profile
GSI Recons A list of the GSI Recon series that will be produced
GSI Preset Families A list of the GSI Preset Families that the user can select using the “GSI Assist Tool”

Parameters specified by a GSI Profile.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Yu L, Li H, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys. 2010;37:234–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. MacDougall RD, Kleinman PL, Callahan MJ. Size‐based protocol optimization using automatic tube current modulation and automatic kV selection in computed tomography. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(1):328–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hu L, Wang Y, Hou H, Wei F, Yang G, Chen Y. Radiation dose and image quality with abdominal computed tomography with automated dose‐optimized tube voltage selection. J Int Med Res. 2014;42(4):1011–1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM Jr. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics. 2006;26:503–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Singh S, Kalra MK, Thrall JH, Mahesh M. Automatic exposure control in CT: applications and limitations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:446–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. “Technology White Paper, GSI Xtream on Revolution CT” , GE Healthcare . 2017. GE Document ID JB52423XX. Available from https://www.gehealthcare.com/-/media/069734962cbf45c1a5a01d1cdde9a4cd.pdf. February 9, 2019.
  • 7. Bushberg JT, Siebert JA, Liedholdt EM, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging, 3rd edn Philadelpha, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2012;347–350. Chapter 10. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Dixon MT, Loader RJ, Stevens GC, Rowles NP. An evaluation of organ dose modulation on a GE optima CT660‐computed tomography scanner. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(3):380–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Massoumzadeh P, Don S, Hildebolt CF, Bae KT, Whiting BR. Validation of CT dose‐reduction simulation. Med Phys. 2008;36(1):174–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Nute JL, Jacobsen MC, Stefan W, Wei W, Cody DD. Development of a dual‐energy computed tomography quality control program: characterization of scanner response and definition of relevant parameters for a fast kVp switching DECT system. Med Phys. 2018;45(4):1444–1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Goh YP, Lau KK, Low K, et al. Fine focal spot size improves image quality in computed tomography abdomen and pelvis. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(12):4545–4550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ranallo FN, Szczykutowicz T. The correct selection of pitch for optimal CT scanning: avoiding common misconceptions. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(4):423–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. “Revolution CT, Revolution CT ES User Manual” , GE Healthcare . 2017. GE Document 5763054‐1ENr1. Available from http://apps.gehealthcare.com/servlet/ClientServlet?REQ=RNEW%26MODALITY=CT. February 9, 2019.

Articles from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES