Skip to main content
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America logoLink to The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
. 2017 May;141(5):2977. doi: 10.1121/1.4979463

Erratum: Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141(1), 613–623 (2017)]

David L Horn 1,a), Daniel J Dudley 1, Kavita Dedhia 1, Kaibao Nie 2, Ward R Drennan 1, Jong Ho Won 1, Jay T Rubinstein 1, Lynne A Werner 3
PMCID: PMC6910006  PMID: 28599570

Due to an inadvertent author error during the electronic submission process, a duplicate copy of Fig. 1 was uploaded as Fig. 4. The previously published Fig. 4 captions refer to the correct figure provided with this erratum. There are no changes to the results or conclusions of the original paper.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Scatterplots illustrating individual speech reception in steady state noise (SNR-50) as a function of SRD threshold at 20 dB (a), SMTF slope (b), and SMTF x-intercept (c) in CI listeners stratified by age group. Line of best fit to data for each age group is shown with corresponding R2 values for significant correlations. More negative SNR-50 indicates better speech reception in noise. Higher values of coefficient “B” indicate better frequency resolution. Higher values of coefficient “A” indicate poorer across-frequency intensity resolution.


Articles from The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America are provided here courtesy of Acoustical Society of America

RESOURCES