Skip to main content
PMC home page
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2019 Dec 10;7:e8188. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8188

Retrospective clinical study of renin-angiotensin system blockers in lung cancer patients with hypertension

Jie Wei 1,2,#, Zhiyang Zhou 3,#, Zhijie Xu 4, Shuangshuang Zeng 1,2, Xi Chen 1,2, Xiang Wang 1,2, Wanli Liu 1,2, Min Liu 1,2, Zhicheng Gong 1,2,✉, Yuanliang Yan 1,2,✉
Editor: Aslı Suner
PMCID: PMC6910116  PMID: 31844581

Abstract

Purpose

Renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs), which include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-2 receptor 1 blockers (ARBs), have been reported to be associated with lung cancer metastasis, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Until now, very limited clinical data for RASBs’ diagnostic and prognostic effects has existed for lung cancer chemotherapy in Chinese patients.

Methods

There were a total of 678 lung cancer patients with hypertension, of which 461 (68%) were in the non-RASBs group and 217 (32%) were in the RASBs group. Patients’ gender, age, smoking status, histologic differentiation, tumor size, pathological grade, lymph node metastasis, pathological stage and progression-free survival (PFS) were retrospectively analyzed between these two groups. The clinical effects of ACEIs and ARBs in lung cancer patients were compared via t tests, and χ2 test, and potential prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

Significant differences were observed in lymph node metastasis between the RASBs and non-RASBs groups. The RASBs group (62.8% vs 71.7%, p = 0.037) and ARBs group (60.0% vs 71.7%, p = 0.030) had lower lymph node metastasis, and patients with RASBs had a lower pathological stage than those in non-RASBs groups (67.1% vs 77.4%, p = 0.044 ). The PFS of the RASBs (10.7 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.040) and ACEIs (12.9 vs 6.7 months, p = 0.021) groups were longer than that of the non-RASBs group, while no statistical difference was shown between the ACEIs and ARBs groups. Moreover, the significant results of PFS were further confirmed in pathological stage III–IV patients. In the non-RASB group, 55% of patients took calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and the ACEIs group have a significantly longer PFS compared to the non-CCBs group (6.4 vs 12.9 months, p = 0.036).

Conclusion

In this study, we showed that the use of RASBs is a positive factor for pathological stage and prognosis of lung cancer patients. Therefore, it is necessary to actively evaluate medical history, especially the use of anti-hypertension medication, in patients with lung cancer and reflect medical history in the treatment and management plans of these patients.

Keywords: Lung cancer, Hypertension, Renin-angiotensin system blockers, Clinical analysis

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and causes more cancer deaths per year than the next three cancers combined in China. Despite remarkable advances in targeted therapy, the morbidity and mortality of lung cancer still have not significantly improved worldwide (Lu, Yu & Yang, 2019; Wang et al., 2019). Statistics from GLOBOCAN 2012, produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), indicated that approximately 1.8 million new cases of and approximately 1.6 million deaths from lung cancer each year (Torre et al., 2015). The survival rates for lung cancer are abysmal, which are in stark contrast to the high survival rates of breast, colon and prostate cancer (Bach et al., 2012). Presently, clinical treatment of lung cancer is generally based on pathological type, stage of tumors, and comprehensive assessment of the overall state of the patients to select appropriate methods to positively treat, improve symptoms, and prolong survival. The main treatment methods include minimally invasive surgery, precision radiotherapy, molecular targeted medicine therapy, Chinese medicine therapy, immunotherapy and psychotherapy. Although surgery, new molecular targeted medicine therapy and precision radiotherapy technology have greatly improved therapeutic effects in lung cancer patients, contrary to most Western countries, lung cancer incidence rates in China are still increasing, and the treatment of lung cancer remains a clinical problem to be solved (Lu, Yu & Yang, 2019).

In addition to long-term smoking, comorbidities are considered as important factors that affect treatment decisions, treatment processes and the prognoses of lung cancer patients and are the main cause of drug resistance and death in patients with lung cancer. Cancer-related comorbidities include hypertension, diabetes, obesity, coronary atherosclerotic heart diseases, and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Hypertension is one of the prominent comorbidities in cancer and affects the survival of cancer patients (Nakaya et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2016). A retrospective analysis revealed that blood pressure was an independent unfavorable factor for tumors (Rhodes et al., 2009). For breast cancer patients, the higher the blood pressure, the higher the likelihood of developing a tumor (Han et al., 2017). Recently, studies have shown that anti-hypertensive drugs have potential anti-tumor effects. Compared with no use of anti-hypertensive drugs, anti-hypertensive drugs such as thiazide diuretics could substantially increase the risk of squamous cell carcinoma (Pedersen et al., 2018). The use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in lung cancer patients with hypertension increased the risk of death, while renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) improved overall survival in the Caucasian population(Menter et al., 2017; Rotshild et al., 2018). However, beta-blockers seem to have no effect on the prognosis of breast, lung, and colorectal cancer patients (Musselman et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2017). These outcomes indicate that the effects of anti-hypertensive drugs vary, especially in different cancers, based on specific pharmacologic action.

RASBs include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), which are used as the initial therapeutic drugs in hypertension treatment guidelines throughout the world. For their potential for anticancer intervention, RASBs have received considerable attention. The original report on the anticancer effect of ACEIs originated from a retrospective cohort in 1998 (Lever et al., 1998). Subsequently, a large number of studies showed a clear protective association between RASBs and lung cancer in Asian and Caucasian populations (Bhaskaran et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2011; Pinter & Jain, 2017; Rao et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015). However, Bangalore et al. (2011) showed that anti-hypertensive therapy with a combination of ACEIs and ARBs increased the risk of cancer. A meta-analysis that used large-scale clinical trial data suggested that users of ARBs could have an increased risk of lung cancer (Sipahi et al., 2010). Double-blind clinical trials, including 15 large parallel long-term multicenter studies, refuted the relative increase in cancer risk (ARBT Collaboration, 2011). While a population-based cohort study showed that patients with ACEIs over 5 years have a significant risk of lung cancer (Hicks et al., 2018). In addition, these studies have limitations, such as being prone to residual confounding factors (Cronin-Fenton, 2018).

The impacts of RASBs on lung cancer remains debated. Regarding the impact of anti-hypertensive drugs, RASBs have been found to be controversial in the risk and OS of lung cancer in different racial groups. However, patients’ clinical stage and pathological grades were not included. Considering the lack of clinical data and ethnic differences, the present study was designed to comprehensively compare both the pathological and prognostic effect of RASBs, as well as ACEIs and ARBs, in Chinese lung cancer patients.

Material and Methods

Patients

This study was conducted among hospitalized patients in Xiangya Hospital. A total of 1219 Chinese patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer and hypertension from January 2016 to October 2018 were retrospectively recruited from the Intravenous Prescription Early Warning and Assessment System, Intravenous Infusion Safety Evaluation Center of Hunan Province, China. We excluded the patients with no proper biopsy, those younger than 18 years of age, those who had a survival time of less than one month after the diagnosis of cancer, those on unknown anti-hypertensive drugs, and those with serious diseases. All patients took anti-hypertensive drugs at least six months before the first diagnosis of lung cancer. Finally, 678 patients were enrolled. According to whether they were taking RASBs, patients were divided into RASBs (n = 217) and non-RASBs groups (n = 461) (including β-adrenoceptor blockers, α-adrenoceptor blockers, CCBs, vasodilators, centrally acting antihypertensives, diuretics, and ganglion blockers) (Fig. 1). The RASBs group was further divided into ACEIs and ARBs groups.

Figure 1. Flow chart of recruiting patients.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Clinical data

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (Approval No. 201906139). Clinical patient indicators were collected including gender, age (Myneni et al., 2013), smoking status, histologic differentiation, tumor size (Cheung et al., 2014), lymph node metastasis, pathological grade and pathological stage. Histologic differentiation and TNM categories were graded on the basis of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (Morrow, 2017). Subgroup analyses were further performed in lung cancer patients who received regular platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 117), as well as in stage III-IV patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 107) (Fig.  1). Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the onset of anti-cancer treatment to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. Follow-up time was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to progression or the last follow-up. For the evaluation of tumor response, CT, MRI or SPECT scans were reviewed by specialized radiologists and response was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (Eisenhauer et al., 2009).

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Measurable data were expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Differences in patient and tumor characteristics between groups were compared using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to predict the PFS of cancer patients with or without RASBs after chemotherapy, and outcomes between groups were compared with the log-rank statistic. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics between RASBs and non-RASBs

The cohort included 678 lung cancer patients with hypertension who received RASBs (n = 461, 68%) or non-RASBs (n = 217, 32%), respectively. The clinicopathological characteristics in 678 lung cancer patients are described in Table 1. Compared with the non-RASBs group, the RASBs group had a significantly lower lymph node metastasis rate (62.8% vs 71.7%, p = 0.037) and advanced pathological stage (67.1% vs 77.4%, p = 0.044) (Fig. 2). However, there were no significant differences in other parameters such as gender, age, smoking status, histology, tumor size and pathological grade between these two groups (p > 0.05).

Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics in 678 lung cancer patients.

RASBs, renin-angiotensin system blockers; ACEIs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin-2 receptor 1 blockers; SD, standard deviation; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; SCLC, small cell lung cancer.

Characteristic Non-RASBs, n = 461 RASBs
Total, n = 217 P-valueb ACEIsa, n = 97 P-valueb ARBsa, n = 117 P-valueb
Gender, n (%)
Male 314 (68.1) 144 (66.4) 0.649 63 (64.9) 0.545 78 (66.7) 0.765
Female 147 (31.9) 73 (33.6) 34 (35.1) 39 (33.3)
Age, years, n (%)
Mean ± SD 64.71 ± 8.10 63.52 ± 7.49 0.183 64.62 ± 8.39 0.914 64.06 ± 8.07 0.328
≤60 125 (27.1) 62 (28.6) 0.692 34 (35.1) 0.115 27 (23.1) 0.376
>60 336 (72.9) 155 (71.4) 63 (64.9) 90 (76.9)
Smoking status, n (%)
Never 181 (39.3) 96 (44.2) 0.219 40 (41.2) 0.718 56 (47.9) 0.091
Ever 280 (60.7) 121 (55.8) 57 (58.8) 61 (52.1)
Histology, n (%)
NSCLC 381 (82.6) 182 (83.9) 0.872 80 (82.5) 0.949 99 (84.6) 0.858
Adenocarcinoma 263 (57.0) 119 (54.8) 53 (54.6) 64 (54.7)
Squamous 98 (21.3) 47 (21.7) 21 (21.6) 26 (22.2)
SCLC 64 (13.9) 27 (12.4) 13 (13.4) 14 (12.0)
Others 16 (3.5) 8 (3.7) 4 (4.1) 4 (3.4)
Tumor size, n (%)
Mean ± SD 41.54 ± 22.30 38.89 ± 20.39 0.177 39.49 ± 20.71 0.447 38.57 ± 20.33 0.236
≤3 cm 149 (32.3) 73 (33.6) 0.621 33 (34.0) 0.720 39 (33.3) 0.716
>3 cm 237 (51.4) 106 (48.9) 48 (49.5) 57 (48.7)
Unknown 75 (16.3) 38 (17.5) 16 (16.5) 21 (18.0)
Pathological grade, n (%)
Well 51 (11.1) 23 (10.6) 0.900 12 (12.4) 0.562 10 (8.5) 0.910
Moderately 132 (28.6) 60 (27.7) 30 (30.9) 29 (24.8)
Poorly 98 (21.3) 40 (18.4) 16 (16.5) 23 (19.7)
Unknown 180 (39.0) 94 (43.3) 39 (40.2) 55(47.0)
Aspirin
Yes 18 (3.9) 16 (7.4) 0.054 5 (5.2) 0.778 11 (9.4) 0.015*
No 443 (96.1) 201 (92.6) 92 (94.8) 106 (90.6)
Open in a new tab

Notes.

a

Patients who took ACEIs and ARBs were excluded.

b

Each group was separately compared with the Non-RASBs group.

*

P < 0.05.

Figure 2. Graphical representations of the proportion of lymph node metastasis and pathological stage between the non-RASBs group and the RASBs group.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) Lymph node metastasis; (B) pathological stage; the statistical significance for difference of means is shown (P values, χ2 test).

Clinicopathological characteristics between ACEIs and ARBs

Among the 217 patients with RASBs, 97 cases received ACEIs and 117 cases received ARBs. Three patients who received both ACEIs and ARBs were excluded for further analyses. We analyzed the lymph node metastasis and pathological stage between the non-RASBs, ACEIs and ARBs groups. Compared with the non-RASBs group, the lymph node metastasis rate was significantly statistically lower in the ARBs group (60.0% vs 71.7%, p = 0.030) (Fig. 3B). However, the lymph node metastasis rate was not statistically significant between the ACEIs and non-RASBs or ARBs groups (Figs. 3A, 3C). For pathological stage, the ACEIs group had significantly more advanced stage patients than the non-RASBs group (68.4% vs 77.4%, p = 0.026) (Fig. 3D), while there was no significant difference between the ARBs and non-RASBs or ACEIs groups (Figs. 3E, 3F).

Figure 3. Graphical representations of the proportion of lymph node metastasis and pathological stage between the non-RASBs group and the ACEIs or ARBs group.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Comparison of lymph node metastasis between (A) the non-RASBs group and ACEIs group; (B) the non-RASBs group and ARBs group; (C) the ACEIs group and ARBs group. Comparison of the pathological stage between (D) the non-RASBs group and ACEIs group; (E) the non-RASBs group and ARBs group; (F) the ACEIs group and ARBs group. The statistical significance for difference of means is shown (P values, χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test).

PFS of lung cancer patients with chemotherapy

A total of 117 patients received chemotherapy, including 79 non-RASBs cases (67.5%) and 38 RASBs cases (32.5%) (Table 2). The PFS of each group were assessed and significant differences were calculated between the non-RASBs and RASBs, ACEIs and ARBs, non-RASBs and ACEIs, and non-RASBs and ARBs groups. Compared to the non-RASBs group, the PFS of the RASBs group was 4.0 months longer in lung cancer patients with a significant difference (10.7 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.040) (Fig. 4A). For subgroup analyses, the PFS of the ACEIs group was significantly longer, approximately 6.2 months longer than that of the non-RASBs group (12.9 vs 6.7, p = 0.021) (Fig. 4C). However, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between the ACEIs and ARBs groups, as well as between the non-RASBs and ARBs groups (p > 0.05) (Figs. 4B, 4D).

Table 2. Clinicopathological characteristics in 117 lung cancer patients with platinum- based chemotherapy.

RASBs renin-angiotensin system blockers; ACEIs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs angiotensin-2 receptor 1 blockers; SD standard deviation; NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer; SCLC small cell lung cancer.

Characteristic Non- RASBs, n = 79 RASBs
Total, n = 38 P-valuea ACEIs, n = 20 P-valuea ARBs, n = 18 P-valuea
Gender, n (%)
Male 62 (78.5) 26 (68.4) 0.238 13 (65.0) 0.335 13 (72.2) 0.795
Female 17 (21.5) 12 (31.6) 7 (35.0) 5 (27.8)
Age, years, n (%)
Mean ± SD 62.96 ± 8.02 61.08 ± 7.89 0.995 61.35 ± 6.60 0.439 60.78 ± 9.31 0.425
≤60 27 (34.2) 17 (44.7) 0.269 10 (50.0) 0.191 7 (38.9) 0.705
>60 52 (65.8) 21 (55.3) 10 (50.0) 11 (61.1)
Smoking status, n (%)
Never 26 (32.9) 18 (47.4) 0.131 9 (45.0) 0.312 9 (50.0) 0.173
Ever 53 (67.1) 20 (52.6) 11 (55.0) 9 (50.0)
Histology, n (%)
NSCLC 60 (75.9) 31 (81.6) 0.567 16 (80.0) 0.766 15 (83.3) 0.543
Adenocarcinoma 43 (54.4) 19 (50.0) 11 (55.0) 8 (44.4)
Squamous 17 (21.5) 12 (31.6) 5 (25.0) 7 (38.9)
SCLC 18 (22.8) 7 (18.4) 4 (20.0) 3 (16.7)
Others 1 (1.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Tumor size, n (%)
Mean ± SD 45.95 ± 19.39 49.55 ± 21.27 0.372 49.61 ± 17.99 0.797 49.47 ± 25.33 0.094
≤3 cm 18 (22.8) 6 (15.8) 0.482 2 (10.0) 0.196 4 (22.2) 0.849
>3 cm 56 (70.9) 27 (71.0) 16 (80.0) 11 (61.1)
Unknown 5 (6.3) 5 (13.2) 2 (10.0) 3 (16.7)
Pathological grade, n (%)
Well 2 (2.5) 3 (7.9) 0.305 3 (15.0) 0.107 0 (0) 0.690
Moderately 14 (17.7) 7 (18.4) 4 (20.0) 3 (16.7)
Poorly 29 (36.7) 10 (26.3) 5 (25.0) 5 (27.8)
Unknown 34 (43.1) 18 (47.4) 8 (40.0) 10 (55.5)
Open in a new tab

Notes.

a

Each group was separately compared with the Non-RASBs group.

Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS in 117 lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Kaplan–Meier method analysis of PFS between (A) the non-RASBs group and RASBs group; (B) the ACEIs group and ARBs group; (C) the non-RASBs group and ACEIs group; (D) the non-RASBs group and ARBs group. The statistical significance for difference of means is shown.

PFS of advanced stage lung cancer patients with chemotherapy

In 109 patients diagnosed as stage III-IV undergoing chemotherapy, 69.7% cases received non-RASBs (n = 76) and 30.3% received RASBs (n = 33), while RASBs contained 17 ACEIs (15.6%) and 16 ARBs (14.7%) cases. We further calculated the PFS of lung cancer at an advanced stage, based on non-RASBs, RASBs and subgroups. Similar results were found in stage III-IV lung cancer patients as stages I-IV. The RASBs group have a significantly longer PFS compared to the non-RASBs group (8.8 vs 6.4, p = 0.027), but no significant difference was found between the ACEIs and ARBs groups (Figs. 5A, 5B). In subgroup analyses, the results showed that the ACEIs group had a significantly longer PFS (12.9 vs 6.4, p = 0.014), while ARBs had no significant differences compared to the non-RASBs group (Figs. 5C, 5D).

Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS in 109 stage III–IV lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Kaplan-Meier method analysis of PFS between (A) the non-RASBs group and RASBs group; (B) the ACEIs group and ARBs group; (C) the non-RASBs group and ACEIs group; (D) the non-RASBs group and ARBs group. The statistical significance for difference of means is shown.

Prognostic analysis of CCBs group

The non-RASB group included patients taking different types of antihypertensive drugs which are associated with an increased or decreased risk of lung cancer, and may have an impact. According to the antihypertensive drug class, we classified the non-RASB group, and found 77.9% (n = 359) of these cases were CCBs patients (Table 3). Further analysis showed there was no significant differences of lymph node metastasis and pathological stage between CCBs and the other groups (Table S1). The PFS of each group were assessed. Compared to the CCBs group, the PFS was 6.5 months longer in the ACEIs group with significantly difference (6.4 vs 12.9 months, p = 0.036) (Fig. 6B). However, no such difference was found between CCBs and RASBs groups (Fig. 6A), as well as CCBs and ARBs groups (Fig. 6C).

Table 3. Number of patients in the non-RASBs group receiving antihypertensive drugs.

Antihypertensive agent Patients, n(%)
CCBs 359 (77.9)
Levamlodipine 149 (32.3)
Nitrendipine 69 (15.0)
Amlodipine 61 (13.2)
Nifedipine 57 (12.4)
Felodipine 13 (2.8)
Laxidipine 4 (0.9)
Lekadipine 2 (0.4)
Benidipine 1 (0.3)
Kalodipine 1 (0.3)
Nimodipine 1 (0.3)
Diuretics 30 (6.5)
Beta-blockers 11 (2.4)
Drug combination 37 (8.0)
Other drugs 24 (5.2)
Open in a new tab

Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS of the CCBs group.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Kaplan-Meier method analysis of PFS between (A) the CCBs group and RASBs group; (B) the CCBs group and ACEIs group; (C) the CCBs group and ARBs group. The statistical significance for difference of means is shown.

Furthermore, we analyzed the prognostic significance of RASBs in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma subgroups (Fig. S1), while the results showed no significant difference by relatively small sample size. The previous substantial epidemiologic evidence suggests that aspirin, which suppresses inflammation, reduces the risk of cancer (Gilligan et al., 2019). Therefore, we re-analyze lymph node metastasis, pathological stage (Table S2) and PFS (Fig. S2) after excluding patients with aspirin to minimize the bias. There is no statistical difference in lymph node metastasis and pathological stage. Consisting with former results in PFS. Compared with the non-RASBs group, the PFS of the RASBs and ACEIs groups was longer with significant difference (6.4 vs 12.9 months, p = 0.026), and the ARBs group did not.

Discussion

Lung cancer, of which the main histological types are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), remains the most frequent cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (Mei et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2017; Yan et al., 2018). Although substantive progress has been made in the diagnosis and targeted therapy of lung cancer, the impact of RASBs associated with metastasis and prognosis of lung cancer patients is still fairly unclear. In this study, for the first time, we showed that lung cancer patients who use RASBs and ARBs have reduced lymph node metastasis relative to non-RASBs. Lung cancer patients with RASBs have a lower pathological stage compared to those with non-RASBs, while the results of ACEIs refuted this finding. Similar results were revealed in cancer progression analysis. Contrasted with the non-RASBs group, RASBs and ACEIs have a preferable PFS of lung cancer, more specifically, in advanced pathological stage patients.

Lymph node metastasis in lung cancer, especially pathological status, is extremely important, not only for prognosis but also to direct postoperative therapeutic strategy (Yu et al., 2018). Previous studies have demonstrated that insertion/deletion polymorphisms of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene upregulate the risk of lymph node metastasis in human tumors such as laryngeal cancer and colorectal cancer (Han & Ge, 2016; Zheng et al., 2017). Recently, clinical data on the benefit of RASBs in primary and metastatic tumors proposed that, by activating immunostimulatory pathways, RASBs can enhance the immunotherapy of cancer and reduce or even prevent adverse effects associated with these therapies(Pinter & Jain, 2017). The anti-cancer effects of RASBs that inhibit cancer cell proliferation, tumor growth and metastasis were reported due to their immunoregulatory, antiangiogenic and anti-inflammatory mechanisms (Chen et al., 2013; Regulska, Stanisz & Regulski, 2013). Ethnic differences have been demonstrated to be an essential parameter related to ARBs and lung cancer risk, made evident by the results of a meta- analysis that showed that incidence of lung cancer was variable between Asians and Caucasians (Zhang et al., 2015). Furthermore, RASBs have already been proven to work as anti-lung cancer effectors with a prolonged PFS and overall survival in Chinese population (Cui et al., 2019; Miao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2013), while no positive relation was found between lymph node metastasis and ACEIs/ARBs in Chinese populations (Wang et al., 2015). Thus, according to our study, the anti-hypertensive medication history of Chinese lung cancer patients could represent a much more convenient and reliable strategy for predicting whether lymph node metastasis during chemotherapy.

Previous studies showed that RASBs potentially have protective effects against lung cancer and taking RASBs can improve patient survival and mirror the positive effects of RASBs in combination with chemotherapy on PFS, both in the early and late stages of lung cancer, which was consistent with our study. However, Buchler et al. reported that ACEIs use among patients with multiple myeloma would lead to a shorter PFS (Buchler et al., 2005), which suggests that other molecular markers such as oncoproteins, miRNAs and lncRNAs may play an important role in prognosis and should be considered as one of the parameters calculated in multifactor models in future analyses. During anticancer radiotherapy and chemotherapy, treatment with DNA damage or targeted medicine may be associated with different dermatological adverse reactions. Radiation pneumonitis is a common problem of radiation-induced injury that significantly decreases patients’ quality of life and limits the therapeutic effect of radiation treatment. Although recent research has found that the risk of radiation-induced pneumonitis is significantly reduced in ACEIs cases, ARBs show the opposed effect (Wang et al., 2015). In this study, a difference between ACEIs and ARBs was not observed in chemotherapy patients. The possible reason may be a limited sample size and study design, such as a retrospective, nonrandom, and single-center trial. Thus, further research is needed to determine whether ACEIs and ARBs treatment cause pharmacodynamic differences in lung cancer and thus affect clinical outcomes and response to treatment.

There are several limitations in this retrospective single center study. We have analyzed several potential confounding factors such as individual characteristics, therapeutic protocols, and certain drugs. However, bias may be caused for instance to difference in number of antihypertensive drugs used, body mass index, concomitant disease and blood pressure control, etc, which are mainly related to lung cancer features. As the limitation of our database, we unable to assess BMI, comorbid conditions, and the changes of blood pressure in all included patients. Through previous studies have shown diabetes and cardiovascular disease could not influence prognosis in patients received RASBs (Menter et al., 2017), Lindgren et al. found that the risk increased by 10% for per 10 mmHg increment in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in lung cancer patients (Lindgren et al., 2003). All these finding suggested more attention should be paid about these unsure parameters in future prospective studies.

Conclusions

In summary, for Chinese patients, the use of RASBs is a positive prognostic factor for clinical treatment including pathological stage, lymph node metastasis and patients’ PFS. Our study revealed that the use of RASBs can be a promising treatment option for lung cancer patients especially those receiving chemotherapy. The prognostic effects of RASBs should be validated in further prospective studies with larger datasets to evaluate the duration, timing, or type of RASBs and their influence on survival.

Supplemental Information

Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS of Lung adenocarcinoma (A–C) or Lung squamous cell carcinoma (D–F).
Click here for additional data file. (308KB, png)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-1
Figure S2. Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS after excluding aspirin.

Kaplan-Meier method to analyze PFS between (A) the non-RASBs group and RASBs group; (B) the non-RASBs group and ACEIs group; (C) the non-RASBs group and ARBs group. The statistical significance for difference of means is shown.

Click here for additional data file. (419.1KB, png)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-2
File S1. The raw measurements of figures.
Click here for additional data file. (19.1KB, rar)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-3
Table S1. Lymph node metastasis and pathological stage of CCB group.

CCBs calcium channel blockers; RASBs renin-angiotensin system blockers; ACEIs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs angiotensin-2 receptor 1 blockers; a Patients who took ACEIs and ARBs were excluded; # Each group was separately compared with the Non-RASBs group.

Click here for additional data file. (39.5KB, doc)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-4
Table S2. Comparison lymph node metastasis and pathological stage after excluding aspirin taken.

RASBs renin-angiotensin system blockers; ACEIs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs angiotensin-2 receptor 1 blockers; a Patients who took ACEIs and ARBs were excluded; # Each group was separately compared with the Non-RASBs group.

Click here for additional data file. (39KB, doc)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-5

Acknowledgments

We thank Elsevier’s English Language Editing Service for assistance with language editing. Dr. Yuanliang Yan is currently a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Pharmacy of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University.

Funding Statement

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2019JJ50932), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81803035, 81703036, 81572946), Hospital Management Research Foundation of Xiangya Hospital (No. 2016GL21), and Clinical Big Data System Construction Project of Central South University (No. 46). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Zhicheng Gong, Email: gongzhicheng@csu.edu.cn.

Yuanliang Yan, Email: yanyuanliang@csu.edu.cn.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jie Wei conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Zhiyang Zhou analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Zhijie Xu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Shuangshuang Zeng and Xi Chen performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, collected data from the samples.

Xiang Wang, Wanli Liu and Min Liu performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Zhicheng Gong and Yuanliang Yan conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (Approval No. 201906139).

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements of figures are available in the Supplementary Files.

References

  • ARBT Collaboration (2011).ARBT Collaboration Effects of telmisartan, irbesartan, valsartan, candesartan, and losartan on cancers in 15 trials enrolling 138,769 individuals. Journal of Hypertension. 2011;29:623–635. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328344a7de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bach et al. (2012).Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry DA, Brawley OW, Byers T, Colditz GA, Gould MK, Jett JR, Sabichi AL, Smith-Bindman R, Wood DE, Qaseem A, Detterbeck FC. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2012;307:2418–2429. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bangalore et al. (2011).Bangalore S, Kumar S, Kjeldsen SE, Makani H, Grossman E, Wetterslev J, Gupta AK, Sever PS, Gluud C, Messerli FH. Antihypertensive drugs and risk of cancer: network meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 324, 168 participants from randomised trials. The Lancet Oncology. 2011;12:65–82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70260-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bhaskaran et al. (2012).Bhaskaran K, Douglas I, Evans S, Van Staa T, Smeeth L. Angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of cancer: cohort study among people receiving antihypertensive drugs in UK General Practice Research Database. BMJ. 2012;344:e2697. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Buchler et al. (2005).Buchler T, Krejci M, Svobodnik A, Adam Z, Minarik J, Bacovsky J, Scudla V, Mayer J, Vorlicek J, Hajek R. Outcome of patients with multiple myeloma and hypertension treated with angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitors during high-dose chemotherapy. Journal of Hematology. 2005;5:559–564. doi: 10.1038/sj.thj.6200571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2013).Chen X, Meng Q, Zhao Y, Liu M, Li D, Yang Y, Sun L, Sui G, Cai L, Dong X. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists inhibit cell proliferation and angiogenesis in breast cancer. Cancer Letters. 2013;328:318–324. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cheung et al. (2014).Cheung P, Faria S, Ahmed S, Chabot P, Greenland J, Kurien E, Mohamed I, Wright JR, Hollenhorst H, De Metz C, Campbell H, Vu TT, Karvat A, Wai ES, Ung YC, Goss G, Shepherd FA, O’Brien P, Ding K, O’Callaghan C. Phase II study of accelerated hypofractionated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for stage T1-3 N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer: NCIC CTG BR.25. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2014;106(8):dju164. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cronin-Fenton (2018).Cronin-Fenton D. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and lung cancer. BMJ. 2018;363:k4337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cui et al. (2019).Cui Y, Wen W, Zheng T, Li H, Gao YT, Cai H, You M, Gao J, Yang G, Zheng W, Xiang YB, Shu XO. Use of antihypertensive medications and survival of breast, colorectal, lung, or stomach cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2019;188:1512–1528. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eisenhauer et al. (2009).Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) European Journal of Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gilligan et al. (2019).Gilligan MM, Gartung A, Sulciner ML, Norris PC, Sukhatme VP, Bielenberg DR, Huang S, Kieran MW, Serhan CN, Panigrahy D. Aspirin-triggered proresolving mediators stimulate resolution in cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019;116:6292–6297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804000116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Han & Ge (2016).Han CD, Ge WS. Up-regulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) enhances cell proliferation and predicts poor prognosis in laryngeal cancer. Medical Science Monitor. 2016;22:4132–4138. doi: 10.12659/msm.896933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Han et al. (2017).Han H, Guo W, Shi W, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Ye X, He J. Hypertension and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:44877. doi: 10.1038/srep44877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hicks et al. (2018).Hicks BM, Filion KB, Yin H, Sakr L, Udell JA, Azoulay L. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and risk of lung cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2018;363:k4209. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huang et al. (2011).Huang CC, Chan WL, Chen YC, Chen TJ, Lin SJ, Chen JW, Leu HB. Angiotensin II receptor blockers and risk of cancer in patients with systemic hypertension. American Journal of Cardiology. 2011;107:1028–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lever et al. (1998).Lever AF, Hole DJ, Gillis CR, McCallum IR, McInnes GT, MacKinnon PL, Meredith PA, Murray LS, Reid JL, Robertson JW. Do inhibitors of angiotensin-I-converting enzyme protect against risk of cancer? Lancet. 1998;352:179–184. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03228-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lindgren et al. (2003).Lindgren A, Pukkala E, Nissinen A, Tuomilehto J. Blood pressure, smoking, and the incidence of lung cancer in hypertensive men in North Karelia, Finland. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2003;158:442–447. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lu, Yu & Yang (2019).Lu S, Yu Y, Yang Y. Retrospect and prospect for lung cancer in China: clinical advances of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Oncologist. 2019;24:S21–S30. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-IO-S1-s02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mei et al. (2018).Mei Y, Liu YB, Hu DL, Zhou HH. Effect of RIF1 on response of non-small-cell lung cancer patients to platinum-based chemotherapy by regulating MYC signaling pathway. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2018;14:1859–1872. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.27710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Menter et al. (2017).Menter AR, Carroll NM, Sakoda LC, Delate T, Hornbrook MC, Jain RK, Kushi LH, Quinn VP, Ritzwoller DP. Effect of angiotensin system inhibitors on survival in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer. 2017;18:189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Miao et al. (2016).Miao L, Chen W, Zhou L, Wan H, Gao B, Feng Y. Impact of angiotensin i-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers on survival of patients with NSCLC. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:21359. doi: 10.1038/srep21359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morrow (2017).Morrow FLGLPDFGFMBGH. The 8th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer; New York: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • Musselman et al. (2018).Musselman RP, Bennett S, Li W, Mamdani M, Gomes T, Walraven Cvan, Boushey R, Al-Obeed O, Al-Omran M, Auer RC. Association between perioperative beta blocker use and cancer survival following surgical resection. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2018;44:1164–1169. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Myneni et al. (2013).Myneni AA, Chang SC, Niu R, Liu L, Ochs-Balcom HM, Li Y, Zhang C, Zhao B, Shi J, Han X, Li J, Su J, Cai L, Yu S, Zhang ZF, Mu L. Genetic polymorphisms of TERT and CLPTM1L and risk of lung cancer—a case-control study in a Chinese population. Lung Cancer. 2013;80:131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakaya et al. (2016).Nakaya A, Kurata T, Yokoi T, Iwamoto S, Torii Y, Katashiba Y, Ogata M, Hamada M, Kon M, Nomura S. Retrospective analysis of bevacizumab-induced hypertension and clinical outcome in patients with colorectal cancer and lung cancer. Cancer Medicine. 2016;5:1381–1387. doi: 10.1002/cam4.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pedersen et al. (2018).Pedersen SA, Gaist D, Schmidt SAJ, Holmich LR, Friis S, Pottegard A. Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer: a nationwide case-control study from Denmark. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2018;78:673–681. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinter & Jain (2017).Pinter M, Jain RK. Targeting the renin-angiotensin system to improve cancer treatment: implications for immunotherapy. Science Translational Medicine. 2017;9:1–11. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan5616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rao et al. (2013).Rao GA, Mann JR, Shoaibi A, Pai SG, Bottai M, Sutton SS, Haddock KS, Bennett CL, Hebert JR. Angiotensin receptor blockers: are they related to lung cancer? Journal of Hypertension. 2013;31:1669–1675. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283621ea3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Regulska, Stanisz & Regulski (2013).Regulska K, Stanisz B, Regulski M. The renin-angiotensin system as a target of novel anticancer therapy. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2013;19:7103–7125. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rhodes et al. (2009).Rhodes DR, Ateeq B, Cao Q, Tomlins SA, Mehra R, Laxman B, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Lonigro RJ, Helgeson BE, Bhojani MS, Rehemtulla A, Kleer CG, Hayes DF, Lucas PC, Varambally S, Chinnaiyan AM. AGTR1 overexpression defines a subset of breast cancer and confers sensitivity to losartan, an AGTR1 antagonist. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:10284–10289. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900351106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rotshild et al. (2018).Rotshild V, Azoulay L, Zarifeh M, Masarwa R, Hirsh-Raccah B, Perlman A, Muszkat M, Matok I. The risk for lung cancer incidence with calcium channel blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Drug Safety. 2018;41:555–564. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0644-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shen et al. (2016).Shen Y, Tian Z, Lu D, Huang J, Zhang Z, Li X, Li J. Impact of pneumonia and lung cancer on mortality of women with hypertension. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:20–30. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0023-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi et al. (2017).Shi YX, Wang Y, Li X, Zhang W, Zhou HH, Yin JY, Liu ZQ. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling reveals novel epigenetic signatures in squamous cell lung cancer. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:901. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4223-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sipahi et al. (2010).Sipahi I, Debanne SM, Rowland DY, Simon DI, Fang JC. Angiotensin-receptor blockade and risk of cancer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Oncology. 2010;11:627–636. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70106-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Torre et al. (2015).Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2015).Wang H, Liao Z, Zhuang Y, Liu Y, Levy LB, Xu T, Yusuf SW, Gomez DR. Incidental receipt of cardiac medications and survival outcomes among patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer after definitive radiotherapy. Clinical Lung Cancer. 2015;16:128–136. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2013).Wang KL, Liu CJ, Chao TF, Huang CM, Wu CH, Chen TJ, Chiang CE. Long-term use of angiotensin II receptor blockers and risk of cancer: a population-based cohort analysis. International Journal of Cardiology. 2013;167:2162–2166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2019).Wang M, Mao C, Ouyang L, Liu Y, Lai W, Liu N, Shi Y, Chen L, Xiao D, Yu F, Wang X, Zhou H, Cao Y, Liu S, Yan Q, Zhang B, Tao Y. Long noncoding RNA LINC00336 inhibits ferroptosis in lung cancer by functioning as a competing endogenous RNA. Cell Death and Differentiation. 2019;26:2329–2343. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0304-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yan et al. (2018).Yan Y, Xu Z, Hu X, Qian L, Li Z, Zhou Y, Dai S, Zeng S, Gong Z. SNCA is a functionally low-expressed gene in lung adenocarcinoma. Gene. 2018;9:16. doi: 10.3390/genes9010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang et al. (2017).Yang P, Deng W, Han Y, Shi Y, Xu T, Shi J, Elhalawani H, Zhao Y, Xie X, Lou F, Zhang R, Jin H. Analysis of the correlation among hypertension, the intake of beta-blockers, and overall survival outcome in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. American Journal of Cancer Research. 2017;7:946–954. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu et al. (2018).Yu X, Li Y, Shi C, Han B. Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer </= 2 cm in size: a monocentric population-based analysis. Thoracic Cancer. 2018;9:3–9. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2015).Zhang W, Liang Z, Li J, Cai S. Angiotensin receptor blockers use and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System. 2015;16:768–773. doi: 10.1177/1470320315607391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zheng et al. (2017).Zheng X, Liu G, Cui G, Cheng M, Zhang N, Hu S. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene deletion polymorphism is associated with lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients in a chinese population. Medical Science Monitor. 2017;23:4926–4931. doi: 10.12659/msm.903312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS of Lung adenocarcinoma (A–C) or Lung squamous cell carcinoma (D–F).
Click here for additional data file. (308KB, png)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-1
Figure S2. Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS after excluding aspirin.

Kaplan-Meier method to analyze PFS between (A) the non-RASBs group and RASBs group; (B) the non-RASBs group and ACEIs group; (C) the non-RASBs group and ARBs group. The statistical significance for difference of means is shown.

Click here for additional data file. (419.1KB, png)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-2
File S1. The raw measurements of figures.
Click here for additional data file. (19.1KB, rar)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-3
Table S1. Lymph node metastasis and pathological stage of CCB group.

CCBs calcium channel blockers; RASBs renin-angiotensin system blockers; ACEIs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs angiotensin-2 receptor 1 blockers; a Patients who took ACEIs and ARBs were excluded; # Each group was separately compared with the Non-RASBs group.

Click here for additional data file. (39.5KB, doc)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-4
Table S2. Comparison lymph node metastasis and pathological stage after excluding aspirin taken.

RASBs renin-angiotensin system blockers; ACEIs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs angiotensin-2 receptor 1 blockers; a Patients who took ACEIs and ARBs were excluded; # Each group was separately compared with the Non-RASBs group.

Click here for additional data file. (39KB, doc)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8188/supp-5

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements of figures are available in the Supplementary Files.

Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES