Skip to main content
The Journal of Chemical Physics logoLink to The Journal of Chemical Physics
. 2019 Jun 7;150(21):219901. doi: 10.1063/1.5108718

Erratum: “Measuring the wall depletion length of nanoconfined DNA” [J. Chem. Phys. 149, 104901 (2018)]

Aditya Bikram Bhandari 1, Jeffrey G Reifenberger 2, Hui-Min Chuang 1, Han Cao 2, Kevin D Dorfman 1,a),✉
PMCID: PMC6910606  PMID: 31176330

In Ref. 1, the wall potential for a silica surface in the Bionano Genomics buffer was incorrectly stated as having a constant value of ψwall ≈ 100 meV. Apart from the typographical error in the unit and the sign, the value is also incorrect. The solutions to Eqs. (5), (10), and (11) of Ref. 1 yield the results in Table I.

TABLE I.

Values of the wall potential at the ionic strengths in Table I of Ref. 1.

I (mM) ψwall (mV)
16.9 −82.7
18.5 −82.0
20.0 −81.4
44.4 −77.3
72.2 −74.3

The value of ψwall affects Figs. 2 and 6 of the original manuscript. Corrected figures appear here as Figs. 1 and 2. In the last paragraph of Sec. II of Ref. 1, the statement “the semiflexible chain model of Eq. (6) predicts δ ≈ 11.05λD, while the rodlike model of Eq. (7) predicts δ ≈ 4.73λD” should be replaced with “the semiflexible chain model of Eq. (6) predicts δ ≈ 10.49λD, while the rodlike model of Eq. (7) predicts δ ≈ 4.45λD.” The remainder of Ref. 1 and the key conclusions are not affected by this erratum.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Corrected version of Fig. 2 of Ref. 1.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Corrected version of Fig. 6 of Ref. 1.

REFERENCE


Articles from The Journal of Chemical Physics are provided here courtesy of American Institute of Physics

RESOURCES