In Ref. 1, the wall potential for a silica surface in the Bionano Genomics buffer was incorrectly stated as having a constant value of ψwall ≈ 100 meV. Apart from the typographical error in the unit and the sign, the value is also incorrect. The solutions to Eqs. (5), (10), and (11) of Ref. 1 yield the results in Table I.
TABLE I.
Values of the wall potential at the ionic strengths in Table I of Ref. 1.
| I (mM) | ψwall (mV) |
|---|---|
| 16.9 | −82.7 |
| 18.5 | −82.0 |
| 20.0 | −81.4 |
| 44.4 | −77.3 |
| 72.2 | −74.3 |
The value of ψwall affects Figs. 2 and 6 of the original manuscript. Corrected figures appear here as Figs. 1 and 2. In the last paragraph of Sec. II of Ref. 1, the statement “the semiflexible chain model of Eq. (6) predicts δ ≈ 11.05λD, while the rodlike model of Eq. (7) predicts δ ≈ 4.73λD” should be replaced with “the semiflexible chain model of Eq. (6) predicts δ ≈ 10.49λD, while the rodlike model of Eq. (7) predicts δ ≈ 4.45λD.” The remainder of Ref. 1 and the key conclusions are not affected by this erratum.
FIG. 1.
Corrected version of Fig. 2 of Ref. 1.
FIG. 2.
Corrected version of Fig. 6 of Ref. 1.
REFERENCE
- 1.Bhandari A. B., Reifenberger J. G., Chuang H.-M., Cao H., and Dorfman K. D., J. Chem. Phys. 149, 104901 (2018). 10.1063/1.5040458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


