Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2019 Nov 12;597(24):5949–5961. doi: 10.1113/JP278799

The contribution of TMC1 to adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in cochlear outer hair cells

Adam C Goldring 1, Maryline Beurg 1, Robert Fettiplace 1,
PMCID: PMC6910908  NIHMSID: NIHMS1055742  PMID: 31633194

Abstract

Key points

  • Hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer channels are opened by deflections of the hair bundle about a resting position set by incompletely understood adaptation mechanisms.

  • We used three characteristics to define adaptation in hair cell mutants of transmembrane channel‐like proteins, TMC1 and TMC2, which are considered to be channel constituents.

  • The results obtained demonstrate that the three characteristics are not equivalent, and raise doubts about simple models in which intracellular Ca2+ regulates adaptation.

  • Adaptation is faster and more effective in TMC1‐containing than in TMC2‐containing transducer channels. This result ties adaptation to the channel complex, and suggests that TMC1 is a better isoform for use in cochlear hair cells.

  • We describe a TMC1 point mutation, D569N, that reduces the resting open probability and Ca2+ permeability of the transducer channels, comprising properties that may contribute to the deafness phenotype.

Abstract

Recordings of mechanoelectrical transducer (MET) currents in cochlear hair cells were made in mice with mutations of transmembrane channel‐like (TMC) protein to examine the effects on fast transducer adaptation. Adaptation was faster and more complete in Tmc2–/– than in Tmc1–/–, although this disparity was not explained by differences in Ca2+ permeability or Ca2+ influx between the two isoforms, with TMC2 having the larger permeability. We made a mouse mutation, Tmc1 p.D569N, homologous to a human DFNA36 deafness mutation, which also had MET channels with lower Ca2+‐permeability but showed better fast adaptation than wild‐type Tmc1+/+ channels. Consistent with the more effective adaptation in Tmc1 p.D569N, the resting probability of MET channel opening was smaller. The three TMC variants studied have comparable single‐channel conductances, although the lack of correlation between channel Ca2+ permeability and adaptation opposes the hypothesis that adaptation is controlled simply by Ca2+ influx through the channels. During the first postnatal week of mouse development, the MET currents amplitude grew, and transducer adaptation became faster and more effective. We attribute changes in adaptation partly to a developmental switch from TMC2‐ to TMC1‐ containing channels and partly to an increase in channel expression. More complete and faster adaptation, coupled with larger MET currents, may account for the sole use of TMC1 in the adult cochlear hair cells.

Keywords: adaptation, deafness, hair cells, mechanotransducer channel, transmembrane channel‐like protein

Key points

  • Hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer channels are opened by deflections of the hair bundle about a resting position set by incompletely understood adaptation mechanisms.

  • We used three characteristics to define adaptation in hair cell mutants of transmembrane channel‐like proteins, TMC1 and TMC2, which are considered to be channel constituents.

  • The results obtained demonstrate that the three characteristics are not equivalent, and raise doubts about simple models in which intracellular Ca2+ regulates adaptation.

  • Adaptation is faster and more effective in TMC1‐containing than in TMC2‐containing transducer channels. This result ties adaptation to the channel complex, and suggests that TMC1 is a better isoform for use in cochlear hair cells.

  • We describe a TMC1 point mutation, D569N, that reduces the resting open probability and Ca2+ permeability of the transducer channels, comprising properties that may contribute to the deafness phenotype.

Introduction

Sound stimuli are converted into electrical signals by the opening of mechanoelectrical transducer (MET) channels in the stereociliary bundle projecting from the top each hair cell. The MET channels are considered to be activated by tension in extracellular tip links connecting adjacent stereocilia along the bundle's excitatory axis (Assad et al. 1991; Beurg et al. 2009; Fettiplace & Kim, 2014). The maximum vibration of the stereociliary bundle at the loudest sound pressures is a fraction of a micron, less than the diameter of individual stereocilia, and so transduction is endowed with several processes of adaptation segregated into fast and slow phases (Eatock, 2000; Fettiplace & Kim, 2014). A role for adaptation is to ensure that MET channel activation always occurs around the ambient position of the bundle, thus maximizing sensitivity. The mechanisms of neither fast, nor slow adaptation are fully understood. Both were initially documented in non‐mammalian hair cells of frogs and turtles (Howard & Hudspeth, 1987; Crawford et al. 1989), where adaptation was considered to be driven by elevation of cytoplasmic Ca2+ that has entered via the MET channels (Eatock et al. 1987; Crawford et al. 1989; Hacohen et al. 1989). In such animals, adaptation is sensitive to the concentrations of extracellular Ca2+, intracellular calcium buffer, and the membrane potential driving Ca2+ entry (Ricci et al 1998). It has been proposed that fast adaptation is a result of Ca2+ interacting with the MET channels to adjust their sensitivity (Crawford et al. 1989; Cheung & Corey, 2006) and that, with slow adaptation, Ca2+ promotes slippage of the upper attachment point of the tip link, thereby reducing the mechanical stimulus to the channels (Howard & Hudspeth, 1987; Assad & Corey, 1992). However, there is little direct evidence for either process. Furthermore, the mechanisms are more uncertain in mammalian cochlear hair cells, where factors altering Ca2+ entry or internal Ca2+ buffering were reported to have little effect on either adaptation kinetics or steady‐state adaptation (Peng et al. 2013) and certain aspects of adaptation have been proposed to arise instead by extracellular Ca2+ modulating the membrane lipid (Peng et al. 2016). However, these conclusions have been controversial (Corns et al. 2014; Beurg et al. 2015) and two important questions persist: is Ca2+ necessary to trigger fast adaptation and does the cation interact directly with the MET channel? We have addressed these issues by characterizing fast adaptation and Ca2+ influx through the MET channel in mutations of transmembrane channel‐like (TMC) protein isoforms 1 and 2 (TMC1 and TMC2).

TMC1 and TMC2 play a pivotal role in MET channel function (Kurima et al. 2002; Kawashima et al. 2011). The two TMC isoforms have been localized to the site of the MET channels at the tips of the shorter stereocilia (Kurima et al. 2015) and a mutation in either isoform alters ion conduction through the MET channels (Kim & Fettiplace, 2013; Pan et al. 2013; Beurg et al. 2014). TMC2 is expressed early in mouse post‐natal development but is replaced by TMC1 by the end of the first postnatal week (Kawashima et al. 2011; Beurg et al. 2018). Tmc1–/– mice lack MET currents in OHCs after postnatal day (P)8 and are deaf (Kawashima et al. 2011; Kim & Fettiplace, 2013). We have also examined a Tmc1 p.D569N mutation,(Kitajiri et al. 2007), a semi‐dominant mutation linked to progressive hearing loss.

Methods

Ethical approval

The care and use of animals for all experiments described conformed to NIH guidelines, and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Wisconsin–Madison (approval reference M006211).

Mouse mutants

The Tmc1 mutant mouse was B6.129‐Tmc1tm1.1Ajg/J (Kawashima et al. 2011) and was obtained from Jackson Labs (Bar Harbor, ME, USA; stock number 01 9146). The Tmc2 mutant mice (B6.129S5‐Tmc2tm1Lex/Mmucd) were obtained from the Mutant Mouse Regional Resource Centre (University of California, Davis, CA, USA). Tmc1 p.D569N mice were made using a CRISPR technique by Applied StemCell Inc. (Milpitas, CA, USA) and the mutation was verified by 500 bp sequencing around the mutation site. Tmc1 p.M412K (Beethoven) mice were a gift from Karen Steel (Kings College London, London, UK). Both C57B6 and CD1 mice were used as controls. Neonatal mice were killed by decapitation in accordance with an animal protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. For all strains, a mixture of male and female mice was used and no gender‐specific effects were noted. Mice were kept under a 12:12 h light/dark photocycle and were allowed solid food and water ad libitum.

Electrophysiology and stimulation

MET currents were recorded from outer hair cells (OHCs) and inner hair cells (IHCs) in isolated organs of Corti of mice between embryonic day 18 and postnatal day 10 (E18 to P10, where E19 = P0 is the birth day) using methods described previously (Kim & Fettiplace, 2013; Beurg et al. 2014). When documenting developmental changes, serial measurements were made on pups from a given litter at different stages of development, 24 h apart, and the results were averaged for three or more separate litters. Recording and stimulation methods were identical to those described previously (Kim et al. 2013; Beurg et al. 2014). Excised cochlear turns were immobilized in a recording chamber on a fixed‐stage microscope (DMFS; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and viewed through a 63× long working distance water‐immersion objective. Apical and basal turns were ∼80% and ∼20%, respectively, of the distance along the cochlea from the stapes. The recording chamber was perfused with saline of composition (in mm): 152 NaCl, 6 KCl, 1.5 CaCl2, 2 Na‐pyruvate, 8 d‐glucose and 10 Na‐Hepes, pH 7.4, at 21–23 °C. Electrical recordings were made with borosilicate patch electrodes, filled with a solution (in mm): 128 CsCl, 3.5 mgCl2, 5 Na2ATP, 10 Tris phosphocreatine, 1,2‐bis‐(O‐amino‐phenoxy)‐ethane‐N,N,N',N'‐tetraacetic acid (BAPTA) and 10 Cs‐Hepes, pH 7.2, and connected to an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Voltage clamp protocols were usually referred to a holding potential of −84 mV. This potential represented a compromise: a larger holding potential increased the current amplitude and therefore improved the accuracy of the measurements, although, if it were too large (−100 mV), it shortened and destabilized the recordings. Because the MET current–voltage relationship is approximately linear, inferences about behaviour at the normal resting potential of −50 mV (Johnson et al. 2011) will be reasonably accurate. The potential across the MET channel in the hair bundle membrane in vivo is augmented by an endolymphatic potential that depends on age (Steel & Barkway, 1989). Uncompensated electrode series resistance was 5–10 MΩ, giving recording time constants of 25 to 50 µs. Experiments were performed at room temperature, 21–23 °C.

Stereociliary bundles were stimulated with a fluid jet or a stiff glass probe driven by a piezoactuator and displacements of the bundle were calibrated by projection on a photodiode pair (Crawford & Fettiplace, 1985). A fluid jet stimulator caused less damage to the bundle and was able to push and pull equally, making is suitable for characterizing the level dependence of adaptation (Fig. 1). However, the stimulus onset was slower, and so the kinetics of adaptation were determined using a stiff glass probe driven by a piezoactuator (Kennedy et al. 2003); the driving voltage to the piezoactuator was filtered at 3 kHz, giving a stimulus rise time of ∼70 µs.

Figure 1. Adaptation assayed with two‐pulse experiment in a wild‐type OHCs.

Figure 1

A, MET currents in a P6 apical OHC for two series of 4 ms bundle displacements, the first control steps and the second test steps, with the test steps being preceded by a 10 ms adapting step. Note the current decay during the adapting step. B, current–displacement relationships for the OHC in (A) in response to the first (control) pulse and second (test) pulse during the adapting step. The current, I, is scaled to its maximum value, I max, 0.84 nA. Note the positive adaptive shift, ΔX, along the displacement axis. C, plot of shift in current–displacement relation, ΔX, vs. the size of adapting step for five P6 OHCs from apex (black circles), and five P3 and P4 OHCs from base (red circles). All currents measured at a holding potential of –84 mV. [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Calcium selectivity

The Ca2+ permeability of the MET channel was determined (Beurg et al. 2006; Kim & Fettiplace, 2013) by measuring the Ca2+ reversal potential of the MET current in the presence of an intracellular CsCl‐based solution (composition in mm: 135 CsCl, 3 mgATP, 10 Tris phosphocreatine, 1 EGTA‐CsOH and 10 Hepes, pH 7.2) and an extracellular Ca2+ solution (composition in mm: 100 CaCl2, 20 N‐methylglucamine, 6 Tris and 10 d‐glucose, pH 7.4). The extracellular solution was applied by local perfusion and was also included in the fluid jet. Reversal potentials were corrected for the liquid junction potential of −9 mV, and the permeability of Ca2+ relative to Cs, P Ca/P Cs, was calculated from the Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz equation using ion activity corrections as specified previously (Kim & Fettiplace, 2013).

Statistical analysis

All results are reported as the mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was investigated using a two‐tailed t test.

Results

TMC1 channels have stronger adaptation than TMC2 channels

A distinctive property of MET channels is fast adaptation, which was characterized in OHCs from two‐pulse experiments (Beurg et al. 2015), and from the time course of adaptation for small displacements. In the two‐pulse experiment, the extent of adaptation was determined from the shift, ΔX, in the relationship between the MET current and the hair bundle displacement produced by a series of adapting steps, A (Fig. 1). The slope of the plot of ΔX against A provided a reproducible measure of the extent of adaptation over the linear range of stimulus amplitudes. In OHCs of wild‐type mice, the parameter, ΔX/A, increased over the first few postnatal days, to attain an asymptotic value, ΔX/A = 0.52; the change in adaptation at the base of the cochlea preceded that at the apex by ∼2.5 days, identical to the apex–base time difference in current magnitude (Fig. 2 A–C). The change in adaptation occurred in parallel with the growth of the maximum MET current and the two were correlated for both apex and base (Fig. 2 D). Accompanying the change in the extent of adaptation was a decrease in the adaptation time constant (Waguespack et al. 2007; Lelli et al. 2009), to a limit at P7 of 0.16 ± 0.03 ms (n = 6), as also plotted in Figure 2 D against the normalized MET current. Adaptation time constants were measured using a stiff probe and are plotted only for the apex. As noted previously in rats (Kennedy et al. 2003), at a given age, the adaptation time constant becomes faster with an increase in the maximum current, for which the bundle may contain more functional channels. Paradoxically, the development of fast adaptation over the first week occurred despite a 20% decrease in the Ca2+ permeability of the MET channel (Fig. 2 E).

Figure 2. Postnatal development of fast adaptation in cochlear OHCs of wild‐type mice.

Figure 2

A, typical MET current families in apical OHCs in response to hair bundle deflection, X, with a stiff probe, recorded at different postnatal ages, P1 to P6, showing an increase in current amplitude. Time course of adaptive decline in small current responses fit with single exponential (dashed red line) with time constant τA given below. Currents measured at −84 mV holding potential. B, development of MET current magnitude in OHCs from cochlear apex (open squares) and base (filled squares). C, development of adaptation effectiveness, shift in activation curve, ΔX, produced by a given adapting step, A. D, ΔX/A results from (C) are proportional to MET current, scaled to its maximum value, from (B) in both apical (open squares) and basal OHCs (filled squares). Adaptation time constant from stiff‐probe recordings such as those in (A) decreases with current scaled to its maximum value (1.13 nA; crosses) for apex. E, Ca2+ permeability of the wild‐type MET channel of apical OHCs relative to Cs+ (P Ca/P Cs, mean ± SD, number of cells above each bar) decreases with developmental age, probably as a result of transition from TMC2‐containing to TMC1‐containing channels.

There are changes in the expression of TMC2 and TMC1 in the first few postnatal days. TMC2‐dependent MET channels first occur but, after a few days, they are replaced by TMC1‐dependent channels (Beurg et al. 2018). We therefore characterized adaptation in the Tmc1–/– and Tmc2–/– mice to determine whether differences in adaptation might arise as a result of different TMC isoforms (Fig. 3 C–F). In six OHCs of Tmc1–/– mice, the extent of adaptation was significantly reduced (ΔX /A = 0.29 ± 0.01; mean ± SEM) and was one‐half the value of that in the Tmc2–/– mice (ΔX /A = 0.57 ± 0.01; mean ± SEM). The difference is significant (two‐tailed t test, p < 0.001), despite there being little difference in MET current amplitudes between Tmc1–/– OHCs (0.88 ± 0.11 nA, n = 6) and Tmc2–/– OHCs (0.81 ± 0.01 nA, n = 4). Although it was clear that adaptation was also faster in the Tmc2–/– than in Tmc1–/– (Fig. 3 A and C), the use of the slower fluid jet stimulation underestimates the speed, and so we measured the adaptation kinetics with a stiff probe (Fig. 3 E and F). In Tmc2–/– mice, the mean adaptation time constant, τA, = 0.16 ± 0.08 ms (n = 7), whereas, in Tmc1–/– mice, τA = 0.41 ± 0.08 ms (N = 4), the two values were significantly different (t test, p < 0.001). The results indicate that adaptation is faster when the MET channel contains TMC1 alone (in the Tmc2–/–), rather than TMC2 (in the Tmc1–/–). Differential expression of the two isoforms may therefore partly explain the changes in the MET current size and adaptation that occur during development. However, even in the absence of TMC2, the MET current amplitude and fast adaptation still took more than 2 days to plateau, indicating that development is limited by another time‐dependent process. Although not extensively investigated, similar differential effects were seen in IHCs. ΔX/A was 0.29 ± 0.01 (N = 4) in Tmc1+/+;Tmc2+/+ mice and ΔX/A was 0.40 ± 0.01 (n = 5) in Tmc1+/+;Tmc2–/– mice; maximum MET currents were 0.97 ± 0.03 nA in Tmc1+/+;Tmc2+/+ and 0.55 ± 0.03 nA in Tmc1+/+;Tmc2–/–, both in P6 mice.The smaller current in Tmc2–/– at this age reflects the fact that TMC2 contributes significantly to the IHC MET channels (Beurg et al. 2018).

Figure 3. TMC1‐containing MET channels show faster and more complete adaptation than TMC2‐containing channels.

Figure 3

A, two‐pulse experiment with an initial control family of hair bundle displacement steps (only one out of 12 test steps is shown; see Fig. 1), then a second test family of displacement steps (only one out of 12 test steps is shown), with three levels of adapting step in OHC of Tmc1−/− mouse. B, shift in activation curve, ΔX, produced by a given adapting step, A, in five wild‐type and five Tmc1−/− mice. ΔX/A = 0.52 in wild‐type and 0.29 in Tmc1−/−. C, two‐pulse experiment (only one out of 12 test steps is shown) with second test displacement steps preceded by three adapting steps in OHC of Tmc2−/− mouse. D, shift in activation curve, ΔX, produced by a given adapting step, in six Tmc2−/− mice (ΔX/A = 0.57). E, MET current onsets for family of displacement steps in Tmc1−/−; red dashed lines, adaptive decline, time constant 0.4 ms. F, MET current onsets for family of displacement steps in Tmc2 –/–; the red dashed lines, adaptive decline, time constant 0.14 ms; holding potential −84 mV. Note ΔX/A in TMC1‐channels (in Tmc2−/− mice) twice the value of ΔX/A in TMC2‐channels (in Tmc1−/− mice) and adaptation twice as fast. G, Ca2+ permeability of the MET channel relative to Cs+ (P Ca/P Cs, mean ± SD, seven OHCs for each measurement) for Tmc2−/− and Tmc1−/− mice at cochlear apex and base. Mouse postnatal ages: P4 (A); wild‐type, P6–P7; Tmc1−/−, P3–P5 (B); P6 (C); P6–P7 (D); P5 (E); P7 (F); P3–P6 (G).

If adaptation is regulated by intracellular Ca2+ (Fettiplace & Kim, 2014), the increase in efficacy and speed could in theory stem from an increase in Ca2+ influx as a result of changes in channel current size or permeability to Ca2+. TMC2‐containing channels have a 17% smaller unitary conductance, 58 pS compared to 70 pS (Beurg et al. 2018), although this is offset by a 40% larger permeability to Ca2+ (P Ca/P Cs = 6.0 for TMC2 compared to 4.2 for TMC1 (Kim & Fettiplace, 2013) (Fig. 3 G). The combination of these two parameters is too small to produce the much slower adaptation in TMC2‐containing channels, and some other difference in the channel or its environment must be identified. A correlation between the speed of adaptation and current size has been demonstrated previously (Ricci & Fettiplace, 1997; Kennedy et al. 2003) and it is possible that this contributes to the changes in adaptation during development. However, the simplest conclusion is that the adaptation not only depends on the Ca2+ influx, but also on the composition of the MET channel, whether containing TMC1 or TMC2. For either TMC1 or TMC2, there was no significant difference in Ca2+ permeability between apex and base (Fig. 3 G).

Tmc1 p.D569N mutation

The relationship between TMC1 and adaptation was also addressed using a Tmc1 mutant containing a single amino acid replacement, D569N (aspartate569 being replaced by asparagine). The equivalent human mutant is dominant and linked to progressive hearing loss (Kurima et al. 2002; Kitajiri et al. 2007). We have shown that, from acoustic brainstem responses, both homozygotes and heterozygote Tmc1 p.D569N mice were completely deaf by P30 (Beurg et al. 2019). However, early in neonatal development, MET currents were recordable from OHCs at P6 in Tmc1 p.D569N mice and such currents were not attributable to TMC2 because they were present in Tmc2–/–. MET currents in Tmc1 p.D569N mutant mice were smaller than those in Tmc1+/+ but nevertheless displayed fast adaptation, with a mean time constant of 0.23 ± 0.04 ms (n = 6) in OHCs and with maximum currents of 0.4–0.5 nA (Fig. 4 A). Mutant MET channels also showed an adaptive shift in the transducer activation curve (Fig. 4 B and C). A plot of the shift in the activation curve, ΔX, against the adapting step, A, (Fig. 4D) had a slope ΔX/A of 0.79 ± 0.06 (n = 5), indicating that the MET channels possess adaption as effective as, if not better than, the control channels in OHCs of Tmc1+/+ mice. Statistical tests on the ΔX/A showed a significant difference to control (t test, p < 0.001), although there was no significant difference in the fast adaptation time constant between the two strains. Enhanced adaptation in Tmc1 p.D569N might be attributable to an increased Ca2+ permeability for the MET channel. However, measurements of reversal potentials for the MET current showed (Fig. 4 E) that, in contrast, there was a substantial reduction in P Ca/P Cs for the Tmc1 p.D569N, from P Ca/P Cs = 4.20 ± 0.7 (n = 5) for the Tmc1+/+ control mice to P Ca/P Cs = 1.24 ± 0.1 (n = 7) for the Tmc1 p.D569N/D569N homozygote, and P Ca/P Cs = 2.11 ± 0.5 (n = 6) for the Tmc1 p.D569N/+ heterozygote. The heterozygote and homozygote are significantly different (p = 0.01), as are the heterozygote and control (t test, p = 0.004).

Figure 4. Adaptation in OHCs from Tmc1 p.D569N/D569N;Tmc2 −/− mice.

Figure 4

A, MET current onsets for family of hair bundle displacement steps; red dashed lines are fits to adaptive decline with time constant 0.26 ms; measurements with glass probe stimulator in a P7 apical OHC at –84 mV holding potential (B), two‐pulse experiment with an initial control family of hair bundle displacement steps, then a second test family of displacement steps preceded by adapting steps of different magnitude. C, current–displacement relationships from record in (B), for first pulse (filled symbols) and second pulse (open symbols) showing shift in activation curve, ΔX, produced by the adapting step, each fit with single Boltzmann equation. D, plot of shift in activation curve, ΔX, produced by adapting steps in P7 apical OHCs of five Tmc1 p.D569N mice, slope ΔX/A = 0.79. E, reversal potential and MET channel permeability of Ca2+ relative to Cs (P Ca/P Cs, mean ± SD, number of cells above each bar) for Tmc1+/+;Tmc2−/−, Tmc1 p.D569N/+;Tmc2−/− and Tmc1 p.D569N/D569N;Tmc2–/–.

Resting probability of MET channel opening

An important functional attribute of the MET channel in OHCs, related to adaptation, is the resting open probability (P OR) of the channel, reflecting the position of the activation curve along the displacement axis. When the hair bundles are bathed in saline containing low, 40 µm, Ca2+ similar to endolymph in vivo (Bosher & Warren, 1978; Ikeda et al. 1987), P OR is 0.4–0.5 (Beurg et al. 2010; Johnson et al. 2011), compared to 0.03 when bathed in saline containing 1.5 mm Ca2+ such as perilymph. Thus, lowering extracellular Ca2+ substantially increases P OR (Fig. 5 A), which serves to generate a substantial depolarizing inward current flowing via partially open MET channels (Johnson et al. 2011). An important functional consequence is that the large depolarizing current offsets an equivalently large outward current flowing through voltage‐dependent K+ channels in the basolateral membrane; together, these two currents result in an OHC resting potential of around –50 mV, near the steepest slope of the prestin activation curve, thus optimizing OHC amplification (Johnson et al. 2011). The increase in P OR has been found to depend on the concentration of the cytoplasmic calcium buffer (Beurg et al. 2010; Johnson et al. 2011; Corns et al. 2014) (Fig. 5). With respect to the hypothesis that adaptation is regulated by cytoplasmic Ca2+, larger amounts of calcium buffer reduce the Ca2+ concentration at the cytoplasmic face of the MET channel and lead to channel opening. In line with this hypothesis, P OR increases both on lowering the extracellular [Ca2+] and on elevating the concentration of the intracellular calcium buffer, BAPTA (Fig. 5 D).

Figure 5. Effects of extracellular Ca2+ and cytoplasmic Ca2+ buffer on MET channel resting open probability.

Figure 5

A, receptor currents for sinusoidal deflections of OHC hair bundles in 1.5 mm external Ca2+ (black traces) and 0.04 mm external Ca2+ (red traces). Two different recordings: Tmc1+/+ with 1 mm intracellular BAPTA; Tmc1+/+ with 3 mm intracellular BAPTA. B, Tmc1 p.D569N/+ with 1 mm intracellular BAPTA; Tmc1 p.D569N/D569N with 1 mm intracellular BAPTA. All measurements were conducted with a fluid jet stimulator in apical OHCs, −84 mV holding potential, P7 cochlea apex. C, mean ± SD of resting open probability, P OR, of MET channels in 0.04 mm external Ca2+ and 1 mm internal BAPTA in the following mutants: Tmc1+/+; Tmc2−/−; Tmc1 p.D569N/+; Tmc2−/−; Tmc1 p.D569N/D569N;Tmc2−/−; Tmc1 p.M412K/+;Tmc2−/−; Tmc1 p.M412K/M412K;Tmc2−/−; Tmc1−/−;Tmc2+/+ . Tmc1 p.M412K is Beethoven, another semi‐dominant mutant. Note P OR is reduced in both Tmc1 mutants, the effects being larger in the heterozygote than in the homozygote. D, resting open probability of MET channels as a function of external Ca2+ and intracellular BAPTA concentration in Tmc1+/+ (green and blue points) and in Tmc1 p.D569N/D569N (white points).

There was a significant reduction in P OR for Tmc1 p.D569N homozygotes and an intermediate effect was seen with heterozygote compared to the homozygote (Fig. 5 B). For comparison, values for the Tmc1 p.M412K mutation are also shown (Beurg et al. 2015; Corns et al. 2016). All measurements with the mutants were conducted using 1 mm BAPTA in the cytoplasmic solution. These effects with the mutants are paradoxical compared to the direct consequences of lowering extracellular Ca2+ or elevating cytoplasmic calcium buffering. Thus, if the Ca2+ influx is reduced by lowering extracellular Ca2+, then P OR increases, whereas, if Ca2+ influx is reduced by lowering the MET channel Ca2+ permeability, then, in this mutant, P OR decreases. However, this would be consistent with an increased adaptation in the mutant (Fig. 4). Despite this result with Tmc1 p.D569N, the effects of external Ca2+ block were identical to wild‐type, with the maximum current increasing by the same amount on lowering extracellular Ca2+ from 1.5 to 0.04 mm. Thus, the ratio of OHC MET current in 0.04 mm Ca2+ to that in 1.5 mm Ca2+ was 1.46 ± 0.2 (n = 9) in Tmc1+/+, whereas the ratio was 1.58 ± 0.1 (n = 3) in Tmc1 p.D569N. There was no difference between the ratios in the control and mutant (t test, p = 0.53). This result suggests that D569 is not the site at which Ca2+ blocks the MET current (Fettiplace & Kim, 2014), even though that residue may contribute to Ca2+ permeability.

Control of adaptation by extracellular Ca2+

With respect to the hypothesis that Ca2+ is involved in regulating adaptation, the properties of adaptation should be a function of external Ca2+. These were examined in OHCs of Tmc1+/+;Tmc2–/– mice using the fluid jet stimulator and a two pulse experiment (Fig. 6). Control measurements in 1.5 mm Ca2+ gave a mean ΔX/A of 0.61 ± 0.02 (n = 5 OHCs). On reducing the extracellular Ca2+ around the hair bundle to 40 µm, the MET current and resting open probability increased but ΔX/A showed a significant decrease to 0.38 ± 0.02 (n = 3 OHCs) (t test, p < 0.001). Initially, these results appear to imply that reducing Ca2+ influx, either by lowering external Ca2+ concentration or reducing the MET channel Ca2+ permeability should diminish adaptation. However, the dependency of ΔX/A on external Ca2+ is a necessary but not sufficient condition to conclude that adaptation is controlled by cytoplasmic Ca2+, and it is possible that the regulation occurs at the external face of the channel.

Figure 6. Effects of external Ca2+ on adaptation in apical OHCs from Tmc1+/+;Tmc2 −/− mice.

Figure 6

A, two‐pulse experiments (only one adapting step shown) in saline containing 1.5 mm external Ca2+. B, Current–displacement relationships for first (filled circles) and second (open circles) displacement steps in (A) showing adaptive shift in curve, ΔX. C, ΔX plotted against adapting step, A, for five OHCs, slope ΔX/A = 0.61 ± 0.02. D, two‐pulse experiments (only one adapting step shown) in saline containing 0.04 mm external Ca2+. E, current–displacement relationships for first (filled circles) and second (open circles) displacement steps in (D) showing adaptive shift in curve, ΔX. F, ΔX plotted against adapting step, A, for three OHCs, slope ΔX/A = 0.38 ± 0.02. All measurements were performed at −84 mV holding the potential with a fluid jet stimulator.

External Ca2+ is known also be involved in the stability of the tip link, uniting the cadherin‐23 and protocadherin‐15 components (Kazmierczak et al. 2007). The dependence of the tip‐link integrity, manifested as channel activation, was investigated as a function of external Ca2+ concentration.The experiment was performed by obtaining a control MET current in saline containing 1.5 mm Ca2+, and then perfusing a low‐Ca2+ saline (Fig. 7 A and B) across the hair bundles. The current changed, taking ∼1–3 min to stabilize, although it then remained constant over 20 min or more. At the concentration of 40 µm Ca2+ used in the experiments described above, the MET current increased ∼50% above that in 1.5 mm Ca2+, reflecting unblocking of the channel (Fettiplace & Kim, 2014). If the Ca2+ was further reduced, the current declined irreversibly, most probably as a result of severance of the tip links (Fig. 7 C and D). Fitting the relationship between MET current and Ca2+ with the Hill equation gave a half‐inhibitory concentration, K I, of 12.8 µm; n H, the Hill coefficient of binding was 5.5, which may be taken as a lower limit on the number of Ca2+ ions involved in the interaction between two cadherin‐23 and two protocadherin‐15 filaments. Surprisingly, K I is scarcely smaller than the purported Ca2+ concentration of 20 µm in endolymph (Bosher & Warren, 1978; Ikeda et al. 1987; Wood et al. 2004).

Figure 7. Effects of external Ca2+ maintenance of MET current in apical OHCs from wild‐type mice.

Figure 7

A, control measurement in 1.5 mm Ca2+ followed by exposure to 12 µm Ca2+ for time shown. B, MET current amplitude is stable after switching to 12 µm Ca2+. C, examples of MET current after switching from 1.5 mm Ca2+ to tests of 0.2 mm, 20 µm and 10 µm Ca2+. D, plot of I Test/I 1.5 mm vs. test external Ca2+, mean ± SEM, number of OHCs measured shown above each point. Results fit with Hill equation with K I = 12.8 µm and Hill coefficient n H = 5.5.

Tip‐link integrity is crucially dependent on external free Ca2+. However, the exact Ca2+ level near the tips of the stereocilia in vivo may be higher than that in the bulk endolymph, partly because of vigorous Ca2+ extrusion by the plasma membrane CaATPase, coupled with a diffusion barrier imposed by the tectorial membrane (Yamoah et al. 1998; Strimbu et al. 2019). Because the resting open probability is a function of endolymph Ca2+, P OR may be used to estimate the free Ca2+ in vivo. P OR, sometimes referred to as the operating point of transduction, has been inferred in intact preparations from intracellular recordings to be ∼0.26 (Dallos, 1986), and from microphonic measurements to be ∼0.45 (Sirjani et al. 2004). Taking this range of values for P OR and assuming the cytoplasmic calcium buffer is equivalent to 1 mm BAPTA (Johnson et al. 2011), from Figure 5D, the Ca2+ near the MET channel is in the range 40–150 µm. In the experiments shown in Figure 5, there was good mixing as a result of the fluid jet stimulator, and no diffusion barriers, and so the Ca2+ near the stereocilia is probably the same as that in the bulk solution.

Discussion

We have characterized the fast adaptation of hair cell MET channels containing different TMC proteins, which are considered to be a molecular component of the channel (Kawashima et al. 2011; Pan et al. 2013; Fettiplace & Kim, 2014; Pan et al. 2018). Our results indicate that both the extent and time constant of adaptation depend on which TMC isoform is present, with the observations effectively localizing the adaptation mechanism to the channel complex. In particular, adaptation was faster and more complete in TMC1‐containing than in TMC2‐containing channels. However, if adaptation is regulated by Ca2+ influx, this disparity cannot be accounted for by differences in Ca2+ permeability between the two isoforms because TMC2 has the larger Ca2+ permeability with comparable unitary conductance. A mutation harboring a single amino acid replacement, D569N, in TMC1 had MET channels showing adaptation of comparable or greater extent compared to wild‐type TMC1 channels, although with substantially smaller Ca2+ permeability. According to prevailing models of TMC1, the D569 residue lies near the inner end of the hypothetical ion‐conducting pore of the channel (Ballesteros et al. 2018; Pan et al. 2018), which might account for the effect on Ca2+ permeability. These conflicting experimental findings raise concerns about the role of Ca2+ entry in adaptation, echoing previous conclusions (Peng et al. 2013; Peng et al. 2016).

We have used three processes to characterize fast adaptation: the extent, ΔX/A, inferred from two‐step protocols; the fast time constant of current decline, τA; and the resting open probability, P OR, in 40 µm Ca2+. Our results show that these three properties do not lead to equivalent conclusions. For example, with TMC2, ΔX/A is smaller than with TMC1, consistent with a slower τA, although P OR is almost identical to TMC1. Another paradox is that P OR is reduced in the Tmc1 p.D569N mutant, suggesting a stronger adaptation, even though the Ca2+ permeability is smaller. The smaller P OR, by reducing the resting depolarizing current, is predicted to hyperpolarize OHCs and consequently diminish prestin‐based amplification (Johnson et al. 2011). This effect may be a significant factor contributing to the deafness phenotype. A similar behaviour was seen with the Tmc1 p.M412K (Beethoven) mutation (Beurg et al. 2015; Corns et al. 2016). A problem with respect to the underlying mechanism specifying P OR is that it may be modulated by other processes (Peng et al. 2016). In many hair cell preparations, P OR varies with concentrations of extracellular Ca2+ and intracellular calcium buffer BAPTA (Ricci et al. 1998; Beurg et al. 2010), as also reported in the present study for mouse cochlear OHCs (Fig. 5). These observations have been used to support the notion that the signal regulating adaptation is the stereociliary Ca2+ concentration. However, although BAPTA is a fast Ca2+ chelator widely used to study the roles of Ca2+ in cellular processes, there is evidence that it has other Ca2+ independent effects, including depolymerization of actin filaments and microtubules and depletion of ATP (Saoudi et al. 2004). Whether these effects are significant in the stereocilia remains unknown.

The fastest adaptation time constant, determined for TMC1‐containing MET channels, was 0.16 ms, with this time constant being measured for small bundle deflections that gave approximately linear responses. However, the time course of adaptation depends on the size of the stimulus and, for large displacements, it becomes progressively slower (Crawford et al. 1989), a behaviour exemplified in the P6 MET currents in Figure 2 A. A possible explanation for the prolongation in time course is that it is partly a result of saturation of the fast component with level, and partly a result of the appearance of another component of adaptation having a 10‐fold slower time constant (Wu et al. 1999; Vollrath & Eatock, 2003).The fast adaptation time constant is also temperature sensitive, as might be expected if it were limited by MET channel kinetics; a Q 10 of between 2 and 3 has been measured in turtle auditory hair cells (Crawford et al. 1991). We previously extrapolated the kinetics of adaptation in mammalian OHCs from in vitro recordings at 22 °C to those expected in the mammalian cochlea in vivo; correction to body temperature (37 °C) and for the presence of an endolymphatic potential that summed with the resting potential predicted an eight‐fold shortening of the time constant (Kennedy et al. 2003; Ricci et al. 2005).

The differential expression of the TMC1 and TMC2 isoforms may partly explain the changes in the MET current adaptation that occur during development, with adaptation being improved by replacement of TMC2 with TMC1. However, even in the absence of TMC2, both current amplitude and fast adaptation still increase over 2 days, implying that development is limited by another time‐dependent process. Possibilities include transport of the TMC proteins up the stereocilia and their incorporation into a multimolecular transduction complex at the stereociliary tip. The changes in adaptation closely follow the increase in current size, a correlation between the two parameters having been demonstrated previously in turtles and rats (Ricci & Fettiplace, 1997; Kennedy et al. 2003). It is conceivable that this correlation reflects the fact that larger currents are attributable to greater numbers of channels at the transduction complex (Beurg et al. 2018). Our experiments indicate that the presence of TMC1 may be superior to TMC2 for optimizing the MET channel for OHC transduction. TMC1 provides a larger current and faster adaptation than required in vestibular hair cells, which are considered to retain TMC2 through adulthood (Kawashima et al. 2011; Kurima et al. 2015). It also endows an apical–basal gradient in unitary conductance, which, together with an increase in the numbers of stereocilia per bundle, augments the hair cell MET current several fold, thus enhancing sensitivity in basal high‐frequency OHCs.

TMC2 is a slightly larger protein than TMC1 (888 compared to 757 amino acids in mouse), with a longer N‐terminal region prior to the first transmembrane domain and C‐terminal region after the last transmembrane domain, both of which might be interfaces with other channel constituents. The N‐terminus is of particular interest because it is the region (residues 81–130 in TMC1) necessary for interaction with the Ca2+‐binding protein, CIB2 (Giese et al. 2017), which could theoretically mediate adaptation. The nearest family member to CIB2, CIB1, which is 59% similar, is an inhibitor of ion flux through the inositol triphosphate receptor Ca2+ channel (White et al. 2006; Hennigs et al. 2008).The N‐terminal interaction region of TMC1 is 80% similar to TMC2, which also interacts with CIB2 (Giese et al. 2017). Differences in fast adaptation between TMC1 and TMC2 might reflect the small differences in this interaction zone. Adaptation has been controversial for some time, although more work is still needed to fully clarify its origin.

Additional information

Competing information

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author contributions

ACG, MB and RF were responsible for the conception and design of the experiments. ACG and MB were responsible for the collection of the data. ACG, MB and RF were responsible for the analysis and interpretation of the data. ACG, MB and RF were responsible for drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. All experiments were carried out at the Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, USA.

Funding

The work was funded by grants RO1 DC015439 and RO1 DC01362 from the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders to RF.

Acknowledgements

We thank Amanda Barlow for laboratory assistance and help with mouse genotyping.

Biographies

Adam Goldring obtained his PhD in physiology with Robert Fettiplace at the University of Wisconsin–Madison (USA). He now works with Paul Fuchs at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore.

graphic file with name TJP-597-5949-g001.gif

Maryline Beurg obtained her PhD in physiology from the University of Bordeaux (France). She carried out postdoctoral studies on L‐type Ca2+ channels with Roberto Coronado at the University of Wisconsin–Madison (USA), and then returned to Bordeaux as a CNRS researcher to study hair cells. She is now a Senior Scientist with Robert Fettiplace.

Robert Fettiplace received his PhD from Cambridge University and began work on hair cells there with Andrew Crawford. He is now Professor of Neuroscience at the University of Wisconsin–Madison (USA). He is interested in mechanotransduction and frequency tuning in the auditory hair cells of reptiles, birds and mammals.

Edited by: Ian Forsythe & Walter Marcotti

References

  1. Assad JA & Corey DP (1992). An active motor model for adaptation by vertebrate hair cells. J Neurosci 12, 3291–3309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Assad JA, Shepherd GM & Corey DP (1991). Tip‐link integrity and mechanical transduction in vertebrate hair cells. Neuron 7, 985–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballesteros A, Fenollar‐Ferrer C & Swartz KJ (2018). Structural relationship between the putative hair cell mechanotransduction channel TMC1 and TMEM16 proteins. Elife 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beurg M, Barlow A, Furness DN & Fettiplace R (2019). A Tmc1 mutation reduces calcium permeability and expression of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in cochlear hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 20743–20749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beurg M, Cui R, Goldring AC, Ebrahim S, Fettiplace R & Kachar B (2018). Variable number of TMC1‐dependent mechanotransducer channels underlie tonotopic conductance gradients in the cochlea. Nat Commun 9, 2185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beurg M, Evans MG, Hackney CA & Fettiplace R (2006). A large‐conductance calcium‐selective mechanotransducer channel in mammalian cochlear hair cells. J Neurosci 26, 10992‐11000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beurg M, Fettiplace R, Nam JH & Ricci AJ (2009). Localization of inner hair cell mechanotransducer channels using high‐speed calcium imaging. Nat Neurosci 12, 553–558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beurg M, Goldring AC & Fettiplace R (2015). The effects of Tmc1 Beethoven mutation on mechanotransducer channel function in cochlear hair cells. J Gen Physiol 146, 233–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beurg M, Kim KX & Fettiplace R (2014). Conductance and block of hair‐cell mechanotransducer channels in transmembrane channel‐like protein mutants. J Gen Physiol 144, 55–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Beurg M, Nam JH, Chen Q & Fettiplace R (2010). Calcium balance and mechanotransduction in rat cochlear hair cells. J Neurophysiol 104, 18–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bosher SK & Warren RL (1978). Very low calcium content of cochlear endolymph, an extracellular fluid. Nature 273, 377–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheung EL & Corey DP (2006). Ca2+ changes the force sensitivity of the hair‐cell transduction channel. Biophys J 90, 124–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Corns LF, Johnson SL, Kros CJ & Marcotti W (2014). Calcium entry into stereocilia drives adaptation of the mechanoelectrical transducer current of mammalian cochlear hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 14918–14923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Corns LF, Johnson SL, Kros CJ & Marcotti W (2016). Tmc1 point mutation affects Ca2+ sensitivity and block by dihydrostreptomycin of the mechanoelectrical transducer current of mouse outer hair cells. J Neurosci 36, 336–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Crawford AC, Evans MG & Fettiplace R (1989). Activation and adaptation of transducer currents in turtle hair cells. J Physiol 419, 405–434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Crawford AC, Evans MG & Fettiplace R (1991). The actions of calcium on the mechano‐electrical transducer current of turtle hair cells. J Physiol 434, 369–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Crawford AC & Fettiplace R (1985). The mechanical properties of ciliary bundles of turtle cochlear hair cells. J Physiol 364, 359–379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dallos P (1986). Neurobiology of cochlear inner and outer hair cells: intracellular recordings. Hear Res 22, 185–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Eatock RA (2000). Adaptation in hair cells. Annu Rev Neurosci 23, 285–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Eatock RA, Corey DP & Hudspeth AJ (1987). Adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction in hair cells of the bullfrog's sacculus. J Neurosci 7, 2821–2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fettiplace R & Kim KX (2014). The physiology of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in hearing. Physiol Rev 94, 951–986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Giese APJ, Tang YQ, Sinha GP, Bowl MR, Goldring AC, Parker A, Freeman MJ, Brown SDM, Riazuddin S, Fettiplace R, Schafer WR, Frolenkov GI & Ahmed ZM (2017). CIB2 interacts with TMC1 and TMC2 and is essential for mechanotransduction in auditory hair cells. Nat Commun 8, 43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hacohen N, Assad JA, Smith WJ & Corey DP (1989). Regulation of tension on hair‐cell transduction channels: displacement and calcium dependence. J Neurosci 9, 3988–3997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hennigs JK, Burhenne N, Stahler F, Winnig M, Walter B, Meyerhof W & Schmale H (2008). Sweet taste receptor interacting protein CIB1 is a general inhibitor of InsP3‐dependent Ca2+ release in vivo. J Neurochem 106, 2249–2262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Howard J & Hudspeth AJ (1987). Mechanical relaxation of the hair bundle mediates adaptation in mechanoelectrical transduction by the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84, 3064–3068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ikeda K, Kusakari J, Takasaka T & Saito Y (1987). The Ca2+ activity of cochlear endolymph of the guinea pig and the effect of inhibitors. Hear Res 26, 117–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnson SL, Beurg M, Marcotti W & Fettiplace R (2011). Prestin‐driven cochlear amplification is not limited by the outer hair cell membrane time constant. Neuron 70, 1143–1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kawashima Y, Geleoc GS, Kurima K, Labay V, Lelli A, Asai Y, Makishima T, Wu DK, Della Santina CC, Holt JR & Griffith AJ (2011). Mechanotransduction in mouse inner ear hair cells requires transmembrane channel‐like genes. J Clin Invest 121, 4796–4809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kazmierczak P, Sakaguchi H, Tokita J, Wilson‐Kubalek EM, Milligan RA, Muller U & Kachar B (2007). Cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 interact to form tip‐link filaments in sensory hair cells. Nature 449, 87–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kennedy HJ, Evans MG, Crawford AC & Fettiplace R (2003). Fast adaptation of mechanoelectrical transducer channels in mammalian cochlear hair cells. Nat Neurosci 6, 832–836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim KX, Beurg M, Hackney CM, Furness DN, Mahendrasingam S & Fettiplace R (2013). The role of transmembrane channel‐like proteins in the operation of hair cell mechanotransducer channels. J Gen Physiol 142, 493–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim KX & Fettiplace R (2013). Developmental changes in the cochlear hair cell mechanotransducer channel and their regulation by transmembrane channel‐like proteins. J Gen Physiol 141, 141–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kitajiri S, Makishima T, Friedman TB & Griffith AJ (2007). A novel mutation at the DFNA36 hearing loss locus reveals a critical function and potential genotype‐phenotype correlation for amino acid‐572 of TMC1. Clin Genet 71, 148–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kurima K, Ebrahim S, Pan B, Sedlacek M, Sengupta P, Millis BA, Cui R, Nakanishi H, Fujikawa T, Kawashima Y, Choi BY, Monahan K, Holt JR, Griffith AJ & Kachar B (2015). TMC1 and TMC2 localize at the site of mechanotransduction in mammalian inner ear hair cell stereocilia. Cell Rep 12, 1606–1617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kurima K, Peters LM, Yang Y, Riazuddin S, Ahmed ZM, Naz S, Arnaud D, Drury S, Mo J, Makishima T, Ghosh M, Menon PS, Deshmukh D, Oddoux C, Ostrer H, Khan S, Riazuddin S, Deininger PL, Hampton LL, Sullivan SL, Battey JF, Jr. , Keats BJ, Wilcox ER, Friedman TB & Griffith AJ (2002). Dominant and recessive deafness caused by mutations of a novel gene, TMC1, required for cochlear hair‐cell function. Nat Genet 30, 277–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lelli A, Asai Y, Forge A, Holt JR & Geleoc GS (2009). Tonotopic gradient in the developmental acquisition of sensory transduction in outer hair cells of the mouse cochlea. J Neurophysiol 101, 2961–2973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pan B, Akyuz N, Liu XP, Asai Y, Nist‐Lund C, Kurima K, Derfler BH, Gyorgy B, Limapichat W, Walujkar S, Wimalasena LN, Sotomayor M, Corey DP & Holt JR (2018). TMC1 forms the pore of mechanosensory transduction channels in vertebrate inner ear hair cells. Neuron 99, 736–753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pan B, Geleoc GS, Asai Y, Horwitz GC, Kurima K, Ishikawa K, Kawashima Y, Griffith AJ & Holt JR (2013). TMC1 and TMC2 are components of the mechanotransduction channel in hair cells of the mammalian inner ear. Neuron 79, 504–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Peng AW, Effertz T & Ricci AJ (2013). Adaptation of mammalian auditory hair cell mechanotransduction is independent of calcium entry. Neuron 80, 960–972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Peng AW, Gnanasambandam R, Sachs F & Ricci AJ (2016). Adaptation independent modulation of auditory hair cell mechanotransduction channel open probability implicates a role for the lipid bilayer. J Neurosci 36, 2945–2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ricci AJ & Fettiplace R (1997). The effects of calcium buffering and cyclic AMP on mechano‐electrical transduction in turtle auditory hair cells. J Physiol 501, 111–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ricci AJ, Kennedy HJ, Crawford AC & Fettiplace R (2005). The transduction channel filter in auditory hair cells. J Neurosci 25, 7831–7839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ricci AJ, Wu YC & Fettiplace R (1998). The endogenous calcium buffer and the time course of transducer adaptation in auditory hair cells. J Neurosci 18, 8261–8277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Saoudi Y, Rousseau B, Doussiere J, Charrasse S, Gauthier‐Rouviere C, Morin N, Sautet‐Laugier C, Denarier E, Scaife R, Mioskowski C & Job D (2004). Calcium‐independent cytoskeleton disassembly induced by BAPTA. Eur J Biochem 271, 3255–3264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sirjani DB, Salt AN, Gill RM & Hale SA (2004). The influence of transducer operating point on distortion generation in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 115, 1219–1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Steel KP & Barkway C (1989). Another role for melanocytes: their importance for normal stria vascularis development in the mammalian inner ear. Development 107, 453–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Strimbu CE, Prasad S, Hakizimana P & Fridberger A (2019). Control of hearing sensitivity by tectorial membrane calcium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116, 5756–5764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vollrath MA & Eatock RA (2003). Time course and extent of mechanotransducer adaptation in mouse utricular hair cells: comparison with frog saccular hair cells. J Neurophysiol 90, 2676–2689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Waguespack J, Salles FT, Kachar B & Ricci AJ (2007). Stepwise morphological and functional maturation of mechanotransduction in rat outer hair cells. J Neurosci 27, 13890–13902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. White C, Yang J, Monteiro MJ & Foskett JK (2006). CIB1, a ubiquitously expressed Ca2+‐binding protein ligand of the InsP3 receptor Ca2+ release channel. J Biol Chem 281, 20825–20833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wood JD, Muchinsky SJ, Filoteo AG, Penniston JT & Tempel BL (2004). Low endolymph calcium concentrations in deafwaddler2J mice suggest that PMCA2 contributes to endolymph calcium maintenance. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5, 99–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wu YC, Ricci AJ & Fettiplace R (1999). Two components of transducer adaptation in auditory hair cells. J Neurophysiol 82, 2171–2181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yamoah EN, Lumpkin EA, Dumont RA, Smith PJ, Hudspeth AJ & Gillespie PG (1998). Plasma membrane Ca2+‐ATPase extrudes Ca2+ from hair cell stereocilia. J Neurosci 18, 610–624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES