Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 20;25(24):7576–7584. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0795

Triple Therapy with MerTK and PD1 Inhibition plus Radiotherapy Promotes Abscopal Antitumor Immune Responses

Mauricio da Silva Caetano 1,#, Ahmed I Younes 1,#, Hampartsoum B Barsoumian 1, Michael Quigley 2, Hari Menon 1, Chan Gao 2, Thomas Spires 2, Timothy P Reilly 2, Alexandra P Cadena 1, Taylor R Cushman 1,4, Jonathan E Schoenhals 1,5, Ailin Li 1,6, Quynh-Nhu Nguyen 1, Maria Angelica Cortez 3, James W Welsh 1
PMCID: PMC6911635  NIHMSID: NIHMS1540567  PMID: 31540976

Abstract

Purpose:

Radiotherapy (RT) traditionally has been used for local tumor control in the treatment of cancer. The recent discovery that radiotherapy can have anti-cancer effects on the immune system has led to recognition of its ability to sensitize the tumor microenvironment to immunotherapy. However, radiation can also prompt adverse immunosuppressive effects that block aspects of systemic response at other tumor sites. Our hypothesis was that inhibition of the MER proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase (MerTK) in combination with anti-programmed cell death-1 (α-PD1) checkpoint blockade will enhance immune-mediated responses to radiotherapy.

Experimental design:

We tested the efficacy of this triple therapy (Radiation + α-PD1 + α-MerTK mAbs) in 129Sv/Ev mice with bilateral lung adenocarcinoma xenografts. Primary tumors were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy (36 Gy in three 12-Gy fractions), and tumors were monitored for response.

Results:

The triple therapy significantly delayed abscopal tumor growth, improved survival rates, and reduced numbers of lung metastases. We further found that the triple therapy increased the activated CD8+ and NK cells populations measured by granzyme B expression with upregulation of CD8+CD103+ tissue-resident memory cells (TRM) within the abscopal tumor microenvironment relative to radiation only.

Conclusions:

The addition of α-PD1 + α-MerTK mAbs to radiotherapy could alter the cell death to be more immunogenic and generate adaptive immune response via increasing the retention of TRM cells in the tumor islets of the abscopal tumors which was proven to play a major role in survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Keywords: Cancer, Radiotherapy, Immunotherapy, Abscopal, MerTK, PD1

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women and men throughout the world (1). At present, the standard of care for advanced non-metastatic lung cancer is radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy, but this approach can be highly toxic and is not effective for controlling metastases, the cause of death for most patients with lung cancer. Traditionally, the benefit of radiotherapy was seen as resulting from its ability to damage tumor-cell DNA (2), but more recently interest has been expressed in its ability to achieve immunogenic cell death (3). To date, studies of this effect have focused mainly on using radiation to “prime” the immune system so as to enhance the ability of radio-immunotherapy combinations to elicit systemic, rather than strictly local, control. Radiation also has immunomodulatory effects via evoking production of type I IFNs and upregulating MHC-I molecules (4), which in turn activate CD8+ T-effector cells and release danger signals such as high-mobility-group box 1 (HMGB1) and ATP, which can activate macrophages (5), and upregulate Fas molecules on tumors, which leads to their apoptotic death. Radiation has also been shown to promote changes in the inflammatory microenvironment (6,7) such as increasing antigen presentation by myeloid cells within the tumor stroma, which in turn enhances T-cell-mediated killing of tumor cells (8). We recently found that resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD1 was due in part to downregulation of MHC-I and that radiation was capable of upregulating MHC-I molecule expression and re-sensitizing tumors to anti-PD1 therapy (4).

On the other hand, radiation also has immunosuppressive effects via its upregulation of Tregs (7), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and M2 macrophages in the tumor microenvironment (9,10). Tregs act to suppress a variety of immune cells, including B cells, NK cells, NKT cells, CD4+ T helper cells, CD8+ T-effector cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells, which dampen antitumor immune responses (11). In addition to Treg-depleting Abs, therapies involving depletion of M2 macrophages or polarization of macrophages towards the M1 phenotype also represent a rational therapeutic approach that can be combined with radiotherapy. Another approach is to use an Ab to the MER proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase (MerTK), a macrophage-specific phagocytic receptor, blockade of which suppresses the phagocytosis of apoptotic bodies after radiotherapy, thereby tilting the balance towards secondary necrosis and induction of inflammatory and immunogenic cell death (12,13). MerTK is a cell surface receptor of the TAM-RTK family (Tyro3/AXL/MerTK Receptor Tyrosine Kinases). Its overexpression on tumor cells has been linked with poor prognosis (14). MerTK initiates efferocytosis by macrophages, which is crucial for the efficient clearance of apoptotic material and intracellular antigens (15). MerTK signaling also alters macrophage gene expression so as to suppress inflammatory cytokine production and polarize macrophages towards the wound-healing, anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype (16,17). During engulfment of apoptotic cells, MerTK suppresses the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12, IL-6, and TNF by M1 macrophages, partly by diminishing nuclear factor-κB signaling (1820); MerTK also enhances the M2 macrophage-induced production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-4 (17,21,22). Therefore, MerTK inhibition promotes re-polarization of macrophages toward the M1 antitumor phenotype and enhances antigen presentation, a crucial step in T-cell priming and activation. Although previous studies have shown that MerTK antibodies can promote antitumor effects when combined with radiation (23), the optimal timing and sequence of radiation with α-MerTK mAb and α-PD1 mAbs have not been evaluated. Here, we tested the efficacy of triple therapy (RT + α-PD1 + α-MerTK) in a murine model of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that includes a KrasG12D mutation. We hypothesized that radiation and anti-PD1 can be made more immunogenic by the addition of α-MerTK antagonist, and indeed we observed improved abscopal tumor control from this triple therapy. We further found this effect to be dependent on CD8+ T cells and NK cells and to be mediated by increased numbers of CD8+ CD103+ tissue-resident memory cells (TRM) at the tumor site.

Materials and Methods

Cell line and antibodies

We used 344SQ parental tumor cells (344SQ-P), a murine metastatic adenocarcinoma NSCLC cell line derived from a spontaneous subcutaneous metastatic lesion in p53R172HΔg/+K-rasLA1/+ mice. This cell line was a generous gift from Dr. Jonathan Kurie (MD Anderson). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, and 10% heat-activated FBS and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The mAbs were all from Bristol Myers Squibb (α-MerTK, 4E9.E6; α-PD1, clone 4H2; and mouse IgG1 isotype control) and were prepared for injection by dilution in PBS at pH 7.4. For the depletion studies, CD8+ cells and NK cells were depleted by anti-CD8 (clone 53–6.7) from BioXcell and anti-Asialo GM1 from Wako Chemicals, respectively.

Mice

Eight- to 12-week-old 129Sv/Ev syngeneic female mice were purchased from Taconic Biosciences and bred at a mouse colony maintained by the Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. All animal procedures followed the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Tumor establishment and treatments

Mice were inoculated by subcutaneous injection of 344SQ-P tumor cells into the right hind leg (to establish primary tumors) and the left hind leg (to establish abscopal tumors). Tumor growth was monitored twice a week with digital calipers and recorded as the change in average tumor diameter. Primary tumors were irradiated with a Cesium source on days 7, 8, and 9, when the tumors had reached about 7 mm in diameter. Local tumor irradiation involved positioning the mice on a jig that shields the mouse’s body except for the leg that is to receive the designated dose. Tumor-bearing mice were injected i.p. with α-PD1 mAb (200 μg/injection) on days 5, 8, 11, and 14; and with α-MerTK mAb (200 μg/injection) on days 7, 10, 12, 15, 19, and 22. For the depletion studies, anti-CD8 (500 μg/injection) and anti-asialo NK depletory were injected i.p. on days 5 and thereafter once/week to maintain the pressure. Mice were euthanized when the average tumor diameter reached 14 mm in any dimension or became ulcerated.

Tumor processing and flow cytometry

Tumors were harvested and tissues digested with 250 μg/mL of Liberase (Roche) and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C while shaking at 105 rpm. FBS was added to stop the digestion reaction, samples were filtered, and TILs were enriched by using Histopaque 1077 (Sigma, Cat #H8889). Cells were then blocked with anti-CD16/CD32 before being stained for flow cytometry. Stains included fluorochrome-conjugated anti-CD4 APC (Cat #100412), anti-CD8 PercpCy5.5 (Cat #100734), anti-CD45 Pacific blue (Cat #103126); anti-CD103 BV510 (Cat #121423), anti-PD1 FITC (Cat #135214), anti-CD49b PE (Cat #108907), anti-CD69 PE-Cy7 (Cat #104511), anti-Gr1 BV510 (Cat #108437), anti- CD11b APC Fire750 (Cat #101262), and anti-F4/80 FITC (Cat #123108) for flow cytometry (LSRII). All antibodies were purchased from BioLegend. Flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowJo software.

NanoString molecular analysis

TILs were isolated as described above, and lysed for RNA extraction. For quality assurance, a fragment analysis system was used to assess nucleic acid fragmentation, with optimal performance defined as 50% of samples of more than 300 nucleotides in length. Samples were analyzed with the NanoString nCounter Immune Panel by the Genomic & RNA Profiling Core at Baylor College of Medicine.

Immunohistochemical staining and analysis

Tumors were harvested 7 days after the last fraction of radiation. Tumor samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 hours then washed in PBS at room temperature. Caspase 3 activity, for assessment of apoptosis, was evaluated using Polink-2 plus HRP anti Rabbit Detection kit for immunohistochemistry (Cat # D39–110). The whole process was performed at MD Anderson IHC cores. Digital quantification was performed using ImageJ software.

Statistics

All statistical analyses were done with Graph Pad Prism 7 software. Tumor growth curves were compared with multiple t tests. Mouse survival was analyzed by using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05.

Study approval

Protocols for animal use, treatment, and euthanasia were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Results

Triple therapy (RT + α-PD1 + α-MerTK) has significant abscopal effects in a 344SQ NSCLC xenograft tumor model

The schedule for creating the mouse model of 344SQ lung adenocarcinoma is shown in (Fig. 1A). Briefly, mice were first injected s.c. with 0.5 × 106 344SQ-P cells in their right hind legs (to establish the primary tumor), and received a second s.c. injection of 0.1 × 106 344SQ-P cells in the left hind legs (to establish the abscopal tumor). Four α-PD1 doses were given i.p. at 200 μg/dose on days 5, 8, 11, and 14; high-dose radiation (36 Gy in three 12-Gy fractions) was given to the primary tumors on days 7, 8, and 9; and six doses of α-MERTK were given (also i.p. at 200 μg/dose) on days 7, 10, 12, 15, 19, and 22. The radiation dose was picked after optimization for apoptosis rates (Supplementary Fig. 1). At day 21, half of each treatment group was evaluated for tumor growth delay and survival and the other for tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TILs).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Triple therapy (RT + α-PD1 + α-MerTK) inhibited tumor growth, improved survival rates, and reduced lung metastases in a mouse model of lung cancer. A, Mice (5 per group) were inoculated in the hind legs with 344SQ non-small cell lung cancer cells, with the right leg considered the primary tumor (and therefore irradiated) and the left leg the abscopal (unirradiated) tumor. Mice were treated with IgG (CTRL), α-MerTK, radiation [RT] (36 Gy in three 12-Gy fractions), α-PD1+ α-MerTK, RT + α-PD1, and RT+ α-PD1 + α-MerTK as shown. Abs were given as i.p. injections of 200 μg/injection. B, Survival of mouse treatment groups from panel A. (****P=0.0002) RT+ α-PD1 versus RT+ α-PD1 + α-MerTK. C and D, Tumor growth curves (plotted as average diameters from each mouse at each time point) indicated that triple therapy (RT+ α-PD1 + α-MerTK) was superior to RT only for suppressing abscopal tumor growth (P= 0.000087). E, Lung metastasis counts showed a decrease with the triple group. All experiments were done twice under the same schedule and with the same numbers of mice (5 per group) to confirm the results.

The triple therapy extended mouse survival beyond day 55 (P<0.0001) (Fig. 1B). The control, α-MerTK-only, and α-MerTK + α-PD1 conditions did not delay growth of the primary (irradiated) tumor (Fig. 1C). The triple therapy significantly controlled the primary tumors in all mice comparing to control group. The triple therapy led to substantial growth delay at the abscopal site (Fig. 1D) as compared to RT only (P<0.001) and suppressed the number of lung metastases (P<0.001) (Fig. 1E) in this model.

Triple therapy increased M1 macrophages at primary and abscopal tumor sites

To explore the mechanism underlying the delay in abscopal tumor growth from the triple therapy, we collected primary and abscopal tumors on day 21 and evaluated them for myeloid cell populations including tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and granulocyte (G)-MDSCs by flow cytometry. The triple therapy did not affect the number of TAMs in the primary tumors (Fig. 2A), but greatly increased the number of TAMs at the abscopal tumors relative to the radiation-only condition (P=0.0402) (Fig. 2B). Similarly, triple therapy did not affect numbers of G-MDSCs in the primary tumors (Fig. 2C) but greatly decreased the G-MDSCs in the abscopal tumor relative to radiation-only (P=0.0351) (Fig. 2D). Finally, the triple therapy significantly increased the percentage of M1 macrophages at both the primary tumors (P=0.0279) and the abscopal tumors (P=0.0256) (Fig. 2E and F).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Triple therapy increased M1 tumor-associated macrophages and suppressed myeloid precursors at the abscopal tumor sites. Tumors were harvested, processed, and analyzed by flow cytometry on day 21. A and B, Percentages of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) (CD45+ Gr1intermediate CD11b+ F4/80+) were analyzed at both primary (A) and abscopal (B) tumor sites. C and D, Percentages of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSC) (CD11b+ Gr-1hi/Ly-6G+) were not affected by any of the tested treatments at the primary tumor site (C) but were suppressed after triple therapy at the abscopal sites (D). E and F, Percentages of M1 macrophages (CD38+ cells gated on TAMs) were quantified at the primary and abscopal sites in each treatment group. The triple therapy increased the proportion of M1 (relative to radiation-only) at both the primary site (P=0.0279) and at the abscopal site (P=0.0256).

Triple therapy activated NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes at the abscopal tumor sites

No differences were found among the various treatment groups in percentages of CD4+ lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment at either the primary or abscopal tumor sites (Fig. 3A and B). Similarly, no differences were found in CD8+ T cells at the irradiated (primary) tumor sites between the triple therapy and radiation-only conditions (Fig. 3C), although an increase may have been present at the unirradiated (abscopal) tumor sites (P=0.0639) (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Triple therapy promoted activation of NK and CD8+ T cells. Tumors were harvested, processed, and analyzed by flow cytometry. A and B, Triple therapy did not affect percentages of CD4+ T cells at either the primary or the abscopal tumor sites. C and D, Triple therapy did not affect percentages of CD8+ T cells at the primary tumor site (C) or at the abscopal tumor site relative to radiation-only (P=0.0639) (D). E-H, Similarly, triple therapy did not affect the percentages of either activated CD8+ cells [CD8+Granzyme B+ (E)] or activated NK cells (G) at the primary tumor sites, but increased the levels of both at the abscopal tumor sites (F) CD8+ cells with P=0.0072, and (H) NK cells with P=0.028 relative to radiation-only. I, NanoString heat map analysis showed that triple therapy led to increases in the expression of Pecam (CD31) and STAT4 (relative to radiation-only) at the abscopal tumor sites.

Next, we quantified activated cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and pan-NK cells among TILs isolated from the primary and abscopal tumors by gating those TILs on CD8+ Granzyme B+ and CD49b+ Granzyme B+ populations. No changes in CD8+ cells were found in the primary (irradiated) tumors in any treatment condition, but the triple therapy led to a significant increase in activated CD8+ cells versus RT only group in the abscopal (unirradiated) tumors (P=0.0072) (Fig. 3E and 3F). Similarly, activated NK cells were only observed in the abscopal tumors with the triple therapy (P=0.0028) (Fig. 3G and 3H).

Further investigation at the level of gene expression using Immuno-NanoString showed that triple therapy led to significant increases (relative to radiation-only) in Pecam (CD31) and STAT4 expression at the abscopal tumor sites (Fig. 3I). Abscopal tumors also showed increased expression of the IFN regulator factor-1 (IRF-1), which activates the expression of IFN-β (24) and p53 (25), after triple therapy (Fig. 3I). Additionally, there was significant increase in IL-12 and TNF-α expression with the triple therapy compared to no treatment, while IL-6 expression was not significantly modulated (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Effects of triple therapy on abscopal tumors depend strongly on the presence of both NK and CD8+ T cells

Next, to evaluate the role of activated CD8+ effector T cells and activated NK cells in the response to triple therapy, we depleted CD8+ cells, NK cells, or both and analyzed the effects on survival and tumor control at the primary (irradiated) and abscopal (unirradiated) tumor sites. Survival was enhanced in the CD8+/NK+-proficient condition relative to the CD8+-depletion condition (P=0.0196), the NK-depletion condition (*P=0.0074), and the combined CD8+- and NK-depleted condition (P=0.0064) (Fig. 4A). Triple therapy without CD8+ and NK+ depletion also suppressed tumor growth at the primary and abscopal sites (Fig. 4B and C). Finally, depletion of CD8+ and NK+ cells abrogated the suppressive effect of triple therapy on the number of lung metastases (P=0.0022) (Fig. 4D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Depletion of NK and CD8+ cells abolished the effect of triple therapy. A, Mice (5 per group) were inoculated with 344SQ cells as described in the text and in Fig. 1A. Mice were given one of five treatments: (IgG [CTRL]), triple therapy (RT + anti-PD1 + anti-MerTK), triple therapy with CD8-cell depletion, triple therapy with NK-cell depletion, and triple therapy with both NK-cell and CD8-cell depletion. All depletion agents were injected intraperitoneally (200 μg/injection). Mouse survival was recorded and compared between treatment groups with log-rank tests. Survival was enhanced in the CD8 and NK proficient condition relative to the CD8-cell depletion condition (P=0.0196), the NK-cell depletion condition (P=0.0074), and the combined CD8- and NK-depleted condition (P = 0.0064). B and C, Measurements of tumor diameters plotted over time show that triple therapy (RT + α-PD1 + α-MerTK) inhibited tumor growth to a greater extent than any of the other treatment conditions. D, Depletion of CD8+ cells and NK cells also abrogated the suppressive effect of triple therapy on number of lung metastases (*P=0.0022 for triple-therapy vs. triple therapy + CD8 and NK cells depletion).

Triple therapy prolongs the adaptive antitumor immune response by increasing the numbers of CD8+CD103+ tissue-resident memory cells.

We harvested both primary and abscopal tumors from mice on day 21, isolated TILs, and gated those cells on CD8+ CD103+ to identify tissue-resident memory (TRM) cells. The triple therapy increased the percentage of CD8+ CD103+ cells at the primary tumor site relative to the radiation + α-PD1 condition (P=0.0142) (Fig. 5A). Triple therapy also increased the percentage of CD8+ CD103+ cells at the abscopal tumor site relative to the radiation-only condition (P=0.0456) and relative to the radiation + α-PD1 condition (P=0.0663) (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Supplementing radiation (RT) with α-MerTK and α-PD1 increases the percentage of CD8+CD103+ tissue-resident memory (TRM) cells. Tumors were harvested, processed, and analyzed by flow cytometry on day 21 for CD8+CD103+ (TRM) cells. A and B, Triple therapy led to increases in CD8+CD103+ TRM cells at both the primary site [P=0.0142 vs. RT + α-PD1 (A)] and the abscopal site [P=0.0456 vs. RT-only (B)]. C, Maintenance α-PD1 therapy (i.e., beyond the prescribed 4 doses) prolonged mouse survival (log-rank P<0.0001)).

Our discovery of CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells in the tumor microenvironment and their expression of PD1 (Supplementary Fig. 3) led us to hypothesize that the effects of the triple therapy could be enhanced (in terms of extending survival) if we continued the α-PD1 treatment throughout the experiment, rather than stopping at four doses, which presumably would protect the TRM cells from exhaustion by blocking the PD1–PDL1 interaction. Indeed, we found that continuing the α-PD1 after the triple therapy extended survival to day 63 (P<0.0001) (Fig. 5C).

Triple therapy (RT + α-PD1 + α-MerTK) promotes significant abscopal effects in pancreatic tumor model and increases the percentage of CD8+ CD103+ cells

To confirm our 344SQ-P results, we performed an additional experiment using another cell line (Pancreatic cell line PANC-02) in C57BL/6 mice. The mice were inoculated by subcutaneous injection of PANC-02 tumor cells into the right hind leg (to establish primary tumors) and the left hind leg (to establish abscopal tumors). Tumor growth was monitored twice a week with digital calipers. Four α-PD1 doses were given i.p. at 200 μg/dose on days 5, 8, 11, and 14; high-dose radiation (36 Gy in three 12-Gy fractions) was given to the primary tumors on days 7, 8, and 9; and six doses of α-MERTK were given (also i.p. at 200 μg/dose) on days 7, 10, 12, 15, 19, and 22 following the same experimental timeline. The triple therapy extended mouse survival beyond day 60 (P<0.0001) (Fig. 6A). The control, α-MerTK-only, and α-MerTK + α-PD1 conditions did not delay growth on both the primary (irradiated) and abscopal tumor sites (Fig. 6B) while the triple therapy significantly inhibited the tumor growth mainly on the abscopal tumor sites (Fig. 6C). We harvested both primary and abscopal tumors from the triple therapy group on day 60, isolated TILs, and subjected the samples to flow cytometry analysis. The triple therapy increased the percentage of CD8+ CD103+ cells at both tumor sites relative to no treatment condition (Fig. 6D).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Triple therapy (RT + α-PD1 + α-MerTK) improved survival rates by inhibiting tumor growth in pancreatic carcinoma model. C57BL/6 mice (5 per group) were inoculated in the hind legs with PANC-02 cancer cells and treated with IgG (CTRL), α-MerTK, radiation [RT] (36 Gy in three 12-Gy fractions), α-PD1+ α-MerTK, RT + α-PD1, and RT+ α-PD1 + α-MerTK following the experimental design in Fig. 1A. A, Survival percentages of treatment groups. RT+ α-PD1 versus RT+ α-PD1 + α-MerTK (****P=0.0001). B and C, Tumor growth curves (plotted as average diameters of tumors at each time point) indicated that triple therapy (RT+ α-PD1 + α-MerTK) suppressed primary (P= 0.0003) and abscopal tumors growth (P= 0.0007). D, Triple therapy increased CD8+CD103+ TRM cells at both the primary site (P= 0.004) and the abscopal site (P= 0.01) versus no treatment group.

Discussion

Standard therapy for early-stage lung cancer usually involves some form of local therapy, either radiation or surgical resection (1). However, the use of radiation is also being explored for its ability to elicit systemic responses to control tumors outside the radiation fields (i.e., “abscopal effects”) (26). Abscopal responses are rare when radiation is used alone or in combination with chemotherapy, and thus data on survival outcomes for patients whose tumors show abscopal effects are rare as well (27). Our prior preclinical (4) and clinical studies (NCT02402920) indicate that combining high (stereotactic) radiation doses with targeted immune checkpoint blockade such as α-PD1 induces synergetic effects that both control tumor growth at the local level and stimulate a systemic antitumor response by upregulating MHC-I molecules on the tumor cells through the induction of type I IFNs (4).

Our findings from the current study suggest that adding α-MerTK and α-PD1 further augments the adaptive immune-mediated effect of radiation by increasing the percentage of CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells at the abscopal tumor sites. These cells are a tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte subpopulation that accumulates in the tumor microenvironment (28,29) and express CD103 [αE (CD103) β7] and CD49a [α1 (CD49a) β1] integrins along with the C-type lectin CD69, which collectively help these cells to migrate into tumor islets by binding to E-cadherin, leading ultimately to T-cell receptor–dependent cell killing. Our NanoString molecular analysis results showed that the Pecam (CD31) gene, known to participate in integrin activation (30), was upregulated at the abscopal tumor sites.

On the other hand, radiation is also known to upregulate PDL1 on tumor cells (31). We found here that CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells have high expression of PD1, which provides a rationale for adding α-PD1 at the induction phase (before RT), concurrent with RT, and in the maintenance phase (after RT and MerTK blockade). This is consistent with other studies showing that long-term treatment with α-PD1 protects against CD4 and CD8 T-cell exhaustion (32). In our study, we found that continuing α-PD1 as maintenance therapy extended survival time, presumably by preserving the adaptive immune effects and function of the observed TRM cells (33).

Macrophages expressing MerTK have been shown to engulf apoptotic bodies of dying tumor cells and convert into M2 phenotype (17). MerTK blockade was essential to shift the apoptotic cell death caused by radiation towards secondary necrosis (34) and re-polarize M2 macrophages towards M1 phenotype at both primary and abscopal tumor sites to strengthen antitumor immunogenic cell death. We also noted that α-PD1, in combination with α-MerTK, acts to augment long-lasting adaptive immunity of radiation by increasing the percentage of tumor-specific memory cells at abscopal tumor sites, which were not subject to the long-term suppressive effect of high-dose radiation (35,36).

We further found that the significant tumor growth delays, improved survival rates, and limitation of metastatic spread resulting from triple therapy is mediated by activated NK and CD8+ T lymphocytes, as verified in our depletion studies. The stability of NK cell and CD8+ T cell activation at the abscopal metastatic tumor sites is possibly related to the presence of CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells. Our phenotyping data of abscopal tumors after the triple therapy showed significant increase in percentages of TRM cells that was associated with tumor response and shrinkage. However, we did not specifically deplete the TRM population that may reflect direct mechanistic link. Our NanoString data showed significant upregulation in IL-12 accompanied with upregulation in STAT4 expression. In agreement with our findings, others have shown that IL-12 may act on CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells to produce IFNγ via STAT4 transcription, which enhances antigen-specific immunity (37,38).

The general lack of effect of the triple therapy at the primary tumor site (relative to the abscopal tumor results) seems to validate our previous studies that high-dose radiation upregulates Tregs (CD4+ CD25+) (39), which are known to suppress CD8+ T cells and immune responses at the primary tumor. Our data also showed significant decrease in the percentage of the immunosuppressive G-MDSCs only at the abscopal site, with no effect on the primary tumor site, by adding α-PD1 in combination with α-MerTK to the radiation treatment.

Increasing the percentage of CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells would have robust clinical application because the presence of these cells would influence survival among patients with NSCLC. CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells reside in tumor islets, where they mediate long-term tumor-specific memory (29); we believe that increasing the numbers of these cells would be of particular benefit for patients who develop recurrence after radiation plus α-PD1 therapy.

We propose the following conceptual framework (Fig. 7) as one possible explanation for the results of the current study. First, radiation initiates the tumor-death process while blockade of MerTK shifts the manner of cell death in the tumor microenvironment from tolerogenic (apoptotic) to non-tolerogenic (immunogenic) (Fig. 7), and α-PD1 sustains the resulting immune effects. Radiotherapy basically primes the CD8+ T-effector lymphocytes by binding to the upregulated MHC-I molecules on the tumor surface. The triple of radiation, anti-PD1, and anti-MerTK maximizes this priming and leads to generation of CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells in the tumor islets at the abscopal tumor sites. The triple therapy also enhances the activation of NK and CD8+ T cells, mainly at the abscopal tumor sites. Finally, continuing the anti-PD1 treatment would prolong outcomes elicited by the radiation and α-MerTK and overcome TRM-cell exhaustion.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Anti-MerTK, in combination with α-PD1 and radiation, reprograms radiation-induced cell death and strengthens the antitumor immune response. Triple therapy tilts the balance from apoptotic cell death to secondary necrosis, resulting in repolarization of macrophages to the M1 phenotype, increases activation of NK and CD8+ T cells at the abscopal tumor sites, and increases the proportion of CD8+ CD103+ tissue-resident memory (TRM) cells.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3

Translational Relevance:

Therapeutics which influence the tumor immune microenvironment are of great interest to combine with radiation to further improve its effect on systemic antitumor immune response. Adding α-PD1+ α-MerTK to radiation significantly upregulated CD8+ CD103+ tissue-resident memory cells (TRM) at the abscopal tumors, delayed the abscopal tumor growth and extended the survival rate. Therefore, increasing the percentage of CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells would have strong clinical application because the presence of these cells would increase survival among patients with NSCLC. CD8+ CD103+ TRM cells mediate tumor-specific memory to treat non-small cell lung cancer patients, mainly those who develop recurrence after radiation therapy.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported and funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb, and further supported by the family of M. Adnan Hamed, the Susan and Peter Goodwin Foundation, the Orr Family Foundation (to MD Anderson Cancer Center’s Thoracic Radiation Oncology program). We also have support from the MD Anderson Knowledge Gap award, Doctors Cancer Foundation Grant, The Lung Cancer Research Foundation, Cancer Center Support (Core) Grant CA016672 from the NCI (to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). We would like to thank Christine F. Wogan for reviewing and editing the manuscript.

Footnotes

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Welsh serves in the science advisory board for RefleXion Medical, Mavupharma, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Alpine Immune Sciences, and he is the founder of Healios Oncology, Molecular Match, and OncoResponse companies. Dr. Welsh is a consultant to AstraZeneca. Dr. Welsh has research support collaboration with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Merck, Mavu Pharma, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, and Nanobiotix pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Quigley, Dr. Reilly, Dr. Gao, and Dr. Spires are employees of BMS pharmaceutical company and have ownership in the form of stock and patents.

References

  • 1.Lemjabbar-Alaoui H, Hassan OU, Yang YW, Buchanan P. Lung cancer: Biology and treatment options. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015;1856(2):189–210 doi 10.1016/j.bbcan.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Begg AC, Stewart FA, Vens C. Strategies to improve radiotherapy with targeted drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11(4):239–53 doi 10.1038/nrc3007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Golden EB, Apetoh L. Radiotherapy and immunogenic cell death. Semin Radiat Oncol 2015;25(1):11–7 doi 10.1016/j.semradonc.2014.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang X, Schoenhals JE, Li A, Valdecanas DR, Ye H, Zang F, et al. Suppression of Type I IFN Signaling in Tumors Mediates Resistance to Anti-PD-1 Treatment That Can Be Overcome by Radiotherapy. Cancer research 2017;77(4):839–50 doi 10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-3142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Tesniere A, Obeid M, Ortiz C, Criollo A, et al. Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Nat Med 2007;13(9):1050–9 doi 10.1038/nm1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Burnette BC, Liang H, Lee Y, Chlewicki L, Khodarev NN, Weichselbaum RR, et al. The efficacy of radiotherapy relies upon induction of type i interferon-dependent innate and adaptive immunity. Cancer research 2011;71(7):2488–96 doi 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee Y, Auh SL, Wang Y, Burnette B, Wang Y, Meng Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of ablative radiation on local tumor require CD8+ T cells: changing strategies for cancer treatment. Blood 2009;114(3):589–95 doi 10.1182/blood-2009-02-206870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang B, Bowerman NA, Salama JK, Schmidt H, Spiotto MT, Schietinger A, et al. Induced sensitization of tumor stroma leads to eradication of established cancer by T cells. J Exp Med 2007;204(1):49–55 doi 10.1084/jem.20062056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chiang CS, Fu SY, Wang SC, Yu CF, Chen FH, Lin CM, et al. Irradiation promotes an m2 macrophage phenotype in tumor hypoxia. Front Oncol 2012;2:89 doi 10.3389/fonc.2012.00089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Menon H, Ramapriyan R, Cushman TR, Verma V, Kim HH, Schoenhals JE, et al. Role of Radiation Therapy in Modulation of the Tumor Stroma and Microenvironment. Frontiers in Immunology 2019;10(193) doi 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schmidt A, Oberle N, Krammer PH. Molecular mechanisms of treg-mediated T cell suppression. Front Immunol 2012;3:51 doi 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Davra V, Kimani SG, Calianese D, Birge RB. Ligand Activation of TAM Family Receptors-Implications for Tumor Biology and Therapeutic Response. Cancers (Basel) 2016;8(12) doi 10.3390/cancers8120107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ravichandran KS. Find-me and eat-me signals in apoptotic cell clearance: progress and conundrums. J Exp Med 2010;207(9):1807–17 doi 10.1084/jem.20101157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Graham DK, DeRyckere D, Davies KD, Earp HS. The TAM family: phosphatidylserine sensing receptor tyrosine kinases gone awry in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2014;14(12):769–85 doi 10.1038/nrc3847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Scott RS, McMahon EJ, Pop SM, Reap EA, Caricchio R, Cohen PL, et al. Phagocytosis and clearance of apoptotic cells is mediated by MER. Nature 2001;411(6834):207–11 doi 10.1038/35075603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Filardy AA, Pires DR, Nunes MP, Takiya CM, Freire-de-Lima CG, Ribeiro-Gomes FL, et al. Proinflammatory clearance of apoptotic neutrophils induces an IL-12(low)IL-10(high) regulatory phenotype in macrophages. J Immunol 2010;185(4):2044–50 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1000017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zizzo G, Hilliard BA, Monestier M, Cohen PL. Efficient clearance of early apoptotic cells by human macrophages requires M2c polarization and MerTK induction. J Immunol 2012;189(7):3508–20 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1200662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Camenisch TD, Koller BH, Earp HS, Matsushima GK. A novel receptor tyrosine kinase, Mer, inhibits TNF-alpha production and lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxic shock. J Immunol 1999;162(6):3498–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sen P, Wallet MA, Yi Z, Huang Y, Henderson M, Mathews CE, et al. Apoptotic cells induce Mer tyrosine kinase-dependent blockade of NF-kappaB activation in dendritic cells. Blood 2007;109(2):653–60 doi 10.1182/blood-2006-04-017368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tibrewal N, Wu Y, D’Mello V, Akakura R, George TC, Varnum B, et al. Autophosphorylation docking site Tyr-867 in Mer receptor tyrosine kinase allows for dissociation of multiple signaling pathways for phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and down-modulation of lipopolysaccharide-inducible NF-kappaB transcriptional activation. J Biol Chem 2008;283(6):3618–27 doi 10.1074/jbc.M706906200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Alciato F, Sainaghi PP, Sola D, Castello L, Avanzi GC. TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-1 expression is inhibited by GAS6 in monocytes/macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 2010;87(5):869–75 doi 10.1189/jlb.0909610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wallet MA, Sen P, Flores RR, Wang Y, Yi Z, Huang Y, et al. MerTK is required for apoptotic cell-induced T cell tolerance. J Exp Med 2008;205(1):219–32 doi 10.1084/jem.20062293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Crittenden MR, Baird J, Friedman D, Savage T, Uhde L, Alice A, et al. Mertk on tumor macrophages is a therapeutic target to prevent tumor recurrence following radiation therapy. Oncotarget 2016;7(48):78653–66 doi 10.18632/oncotarget.11823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miyamoto M, Fujita T, Kimura Y, Maruyama M, Harada H, Sudo Y, et al. Regulated expression of a gene encoding a nuclear factor, IRF-1, that specifically binds to IFN-beta gene regulatory elements. Cell 1988;54(6):903–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dornan D, Eckert M, Wallace M, Shimizu H, Ramsay E, Hupp TR, et al. Interferon regulatory factor 1 binding to p300 stimulates DNA-dependent acetylation of p53. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24(22):10083–98 doi 10.1128/MCB.24.22.10083-10098.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Postow MA, Callahan MK, Barker CA, Yamada Y, Yuan J, Kitano S, et al. Immunologic correlates of the abscopal effect in a patient with melanoma. N Engl J Med 2012;366(10):925–31 doi 10.1056/NEJMoa1112824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Persa E, Balogh A, Safrany G, Lumniczky K. The effect of ionizing radiation on regulatory T cells in health and disease. Cancer Lett 2015;368(2):252–61 doi 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Park SL, Buzzai A, Rautela J, Hor JL, Hochheiser K, Effern M, et al. Tissue-resident memory CD8(+) T cells promote melanoma-immune equilibrium in skin. Nature 2019;565(7739):366–71 doi 10.1038/s41586-018-0812-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Djenidi F, Adam J, Goubar A, Durgeau A, Meurice G, de Montpreville V, et al. CD8+CD103+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are tumor-specific tissue-resident memory T cells and a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer patients. J Immunol 2015;194(7):3475–86 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1402711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Berman ME, Xie Y, Muller WA. Roles of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1, CD31) in natural killer cell transendothelial migration and beta 2 integrin activation. J Immunol 1996;156(4):1515–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim KJ, Kim JH, Lee SJ, Lee EJ, Shin EC, Seong J. Radiation improves antitumor effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor in murine hepatocellular carcinoma model. Oncotarget 2017;8(25):41242–55 doi 10.18632/oncotarget.17168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Freeman GJ, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R, Sharpe AH. Reinvigorating exhausted HIV-specific T cells via PD-1-PD-1 ligand blockade. J Exp Med 2006;203(10):2223–7 doi 10.1084/jem.20061800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Corgnac S, Boutet M, Kfoury M, Naltet C, Mami-Chouaib F. The Emerging Role of CD8(+) Tissue Resident Memory T (TRM) Cells in Antitumor Immunity: A Unique Functional Contribution of the CD103 Integrin. Front Immunol 2018;9:1904 doi 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Silva MT. Secondary necrosis: the natural outcome of the complete apoptotic program. FEBS Lett 2010;584(22):4491–9 doi 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Walle T, Martinez Monge R, Cerwenka A, Ajona D, Melero I, Lecanda F. Radiation effects on antitumor immune responses: current perspectives and challenges. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2018;10:1758834017742575 doi 10.1177/1758834017742575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Merrick A, Errington F, Milward K, O’Donnell D, Harrington K, Bateman A, et al. Immunosuppressive effects of radiation on human dendritic cells: reduced IL-12 production on activation and impairment of naive T-cell priming. Br J Cancer 2005;92(8):1450–8 doi 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schoenborn JR, Wilson CB. Regulation of interferon-gamma during innate and adaptive immune responses. Adv Immunol 2007;96:41–101 doi 10.1016/S0065-2776(07)96002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bacon CM, Petricoin EF 3rd, Ortaldo JR, Rees RC, Larner AC, Johnston JA, et al. Interleukin 12 induces tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of STAT4 in human lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92(16):7307–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schoenhals JE, Cushman TR, Barsoumian HB, Li A, Cadena AP, Niknam S, et al. Anti-glucocorticoid-induced Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Protein (GITR) Therapy Overcomes Radiation-Induced Treg Immunosuppression and Drives Abscopal Effects. Front Immunol 2018;9:2170 doi 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3

RESOURCES