Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2018 Jan 19;287(2):494–503. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171221

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

ROC analysis for the data from derivation set. (a) The normalized MT ratio is highly accurate on ROC analysis with an AUC of 0.919 (95% CI, 0.832–1.000; P=0.000) for distinguishing moderately-severely fibrotic from non-fibrotic and mildly fibrotic bowel walls, followed by ADC (AUC=0.747; 95% CI, 0.615–0.879; P=0.001) and the percentage of enhancement gain (AUC=0.592; 95% CI, 0.464–0.719; P=0.209). (b) The ROC curve also demonstrates the highest accuracy of normalized MT ratios with an AUC of 0.981 (95% CI, 0.956–1.000; P=0.000) for differentiating fibrotic and non-fibrotic bowel walls, followed by ADC (AUC=0.860; 95% CI, 0.761–0.959; P=0.000) and the percentage of enhancement gain (AUC=0.646; 95% CI, 0.514–0.778; P=0.103). (CI, confidence interval; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; MT, magnetization transfer; AUC, the area under the ROC curve; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient)