Skip to main content
Internal Medicine logoLink to Internal Medicine
editorial
. 2019 Jul 10;58(22):3211–3212. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3151-19

A Prompt Diagnosis of Superior Vena Cava Obstruction Established by Physical Examination

Ikuo Sekine 1
PMCID: PMC6911752  PMID: 31292403

In the era of rapid technological advancements, clinicians have come to rely on laboratory tests and imaging techniques, as they have become easily available (1). However, now more than ever, clinicians still need to carefully record the patient's medical history and perform physical examinations. Each disease has a priori clinical features that differentiate it from other similar conditions, serving as clues for a definitive diagnosis. Accurate diagnoses from test results and imaging findings are based on appropriate hypotheses made using clues from history and physical examination (2).

While physical examination has many disadvantages, such as low sensitivity, insufficient reliability, and lack of reproducibility, it has the advantages of being noninvasive, time-saving, and economical (3). Physical examination can be performed anytime, anyplace, and many times over. Therefore, it plays an important role in monitoring the changes of pathophysiology in real time. Although a comprehensive and non-selective compilation of physical signs is no longer considered useful (4), selected physical examination can provide definite signs of a disease with good specificity, quantitative evaluation of the disease (3), and thus sometimes make it possible to make a "snap diagnosis" in a short time (5). One study reported that among patients newly admitted to an internal medicine department, 20% could be correctly diagnosed at admission based on the medical history alone and 40% with the combination of history and physical examination (6). In addition, a combination of these methods could provide prognostic information in selected medical situations (7).

In the latest issue of the journal Internal Medicine, Adachi et al. reported a case of superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome with severe venous dilatation in the thorax and abdomen (8). The SVC is a thin-walled low-pressure vessel, measuring from 6 to 8 cm in length, that drains venous blood from the head, neck, upper extremities, and upper thorax to the right atrium of the heart, carrying approximately one-third of the total venous return to the heart (9). More than 70% of SVC syndromes occur secondary to external compression from the intrathoracic malignant masses, most commonly from lung cancer, followed by malignant lymphoma and other metastatic cancers. In addition, benign causes, such as thrombosis and stenosis of SVC from central venous catheters and pacemaker leads, are now increasing (9, 10). The signs and symptoms of SVC syndrome result from an impairment of the blood flow to the heart via the SVC. This is an oncologic emergency because patients with this syndrome frequently complain of dyspnea and orthopnea, and present with edema, flushing, and cyanosis in the face, neck, arms, and upper trunk. In serious cases, progressive headache and a disturbance of consciousness may be noted, along with an elevated intracranial pressure (9, 10). The prognosis of SVC syndrome largely depends on the underlying disease. The prognosis of the underlying disease is generally poorer when accompanied with SVC syndrome (9, 10).

The present case showed winding and distended veins in the thoracic and abdominal wall that was identified at a glance. For the differential diagnosis of deep venous obstruction, the direction of the blood flow is crucial (Figure) (11, 12). Blood drains downward (caudal) in patients with SVC obstruction, whereas it drains upward (cephalad) in cases of inferior vena cava obstruction. Dilated, tortuous veins (Caput Medusae) radiating from the umbilicus suggest portal hypertension. The distribution of the venous distention is also important (Figure): Venous distention confined to the neck, shoulder girdles, and upper thorax indicates that the obstruction site is above the entry of the azygos vein in the SVC. In this case, blood from the head and neck drains through the external jugular vein, the superficial veins on the anterior thorax, internal thoracic veins, intercostal veins, and finally, the azygos vein system that enters the SVC below the obstruction site (13). When the obstruction occurs below the entry of the azygos vein, then the blood from the head and neck flows through collateral veins, such as the thoracoepigastric vein and inferior epigastric vein, which are connected to the external iliac vein, and finally, to the inferior vena cava (13). In this case, the cervical venous pressure can reach 20 to 40 mm Hg (normal range: 2 to 8 mm Hg), resulting in an elevated risk for cerebral edema and upper respiratory tract narrowing from the nasal region and laryngeal edema (9).

Figure.

Figure.

Venous patterns in the thoracic and abdominal wall. The direction of the blood flow and distribution of venous distention are indicative of deep venous obstruction.

This case report reminds us that focused physical examination provides both functional and structural information essential for the treatment planning of patients.

The author states that he has no Conflict of Interest (COI).

References

  • 1.Abou Ziki MD, Podell DN, Schiliro DM. The value of the history and physical examination--sailing through medicine with modern tools: a teachable moment. JAMA Intern Med 175: 1901-1902, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.LeBland RF, Brown DD, DeGowin RL. DeGowin's Diagnostic Examination. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Almeida Junior GL, Xavier SS, Garcia MI, et al. Hemodynamic assessment in heart failure: role of physical examination and noninvasive methods. Arq Bras Cardiol 98: e15-e21, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Benbassat J, Baumal R. Narrative review: should teaching of the respiratory physical examination be restricted only to signs with proven reliability and validity? J Gen Intern Med 25: 865-872, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.DeGowin EL, DeGowin RL. Bedside diagnostic examination. Macmillan Publishing, New York, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Paley L, Zornitzki T, Cohen J, et al. Utility of clinical examination in the diagnosis of emergency department patients admitted to the department of medicine of an academic hospital. Arch Intern Med 171: 1394-1396, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nohria A, Tsang SW, Fang JC, et al. Clinical assessment identifies hemodynamic profiles that predict outcomes in patients admitted with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 41: 1797-1804, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Adachi Y, Yano S. Caput medusae-like venous dilatation in lung cancer. Intern Med 58: 3341-3342, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wilson LD, Detterbeck FC, Yahalom J. Clinical practice. Superior vena cava syndrome with malignant causes. N Engl J Med 356: 1862-1869, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Friedman T, Quencer KB, Kishore SA, et al. Malignant venous obstruction: superior vena cava syndrome and beyond. Semin Intervent Radiol 34: 398-408, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Burnside JW. Adam's Physical Diagnosis. The Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Orient JM. Sapira's Art and Science of Bedside Diagnosis. 4th ed Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Roswit B, Kaplan G, Jacobson HG. The superior vena cava obstruction syndrome in bronchogenic carcinoma; pathologic physiology and therapeutic management. Radiology 61: 722-737, 1953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Internal Medicine

RESOURCES