Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Med Chem. 2018 Nov 19;162:810–824. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.11.019

Inhibitable Photolabeling by Neurosteroid Diazirine Analog in the β3-Subunit of Human Hetereopentameric Type A GABA Receptors

Bo Wu §, Selwyn S Jayakar , Xiaojuan Zhou , Katherine Titterton , David C Chiara , Andrea L Szabo , Pavel Y Savechenkov §, Daniel E Kent &, Jonathan B Cohen , Stuart A Forman , Keith W Miller ‡,#, Karol S Bruzik §
PMCID: PMC6912599  NIHMSID: NIHMS1062175  PMID: 30544077

Abstract

Pregnanolone and allopregnanolone-type ligands exert general anesthetic, anticonvulsant and anxiolytic effects due to their positive modulatory interactions with the GABAA receptors in the brain. Binding sites for these neurosteroids have been recently identified at subunit interfaces in the transmembrane domain (TMD) of homomeric β3 GABAA receptors using photoaffinity labeling techniques, and in homomeric chimeric receptors containing GABAA receptor α subunit TMDs by crystallography. Steroid binding sites have yet to be determined in human, heteromeric, functionally reconstituted, full-length, glycosylated GABAA receptors. Here, we report on the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of several photoaffinity analogs of pregnanolone and allopregnanolone, of which 21-[4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)-3H-diazirin-3-yl)benzoxy]allopregnanolone (21-pTFDBzox-AP) was the most potent ligand. It is a partial positive modulator of the human α1β3 and α1β3γ2L GABAA receptors at sub-micromolar concentrations. [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP photoincorporated in a pharmacologically specific manner into the α and β subunits of those receptors, with the β3 subunit photolabeled most efficiently. Importantly, photolabeling by [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP was inhibited by the positive steroid modulators alphaxalone, pregnanolone and allopregnanolone, but not by inhibitory neurosteroid pregnenolone sulfate or by two potent general anesthetics and GABAAR positive allosteric modulators, etomidate and an anesthetic barbiturate. The latter two ligands bind to sites at subunit interfaces in the GABAAR that are different from those interacting with neurosteroids. 21-pTFDBzox-AP’s potency and pharmacological specificity of photolabeling indicate its suitability for characterizing neurosteroid binding sites in native GABAA receptors.

INTRODUCTION

Neurosteroids such as pregnanolone (1, Chart 1), allopregnanolone (2) and tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone (THDOC, 3) are potent positive allosteric modulators of GABA type-A receptors (GABAAR), producing sedative, anxiolytic and anticonvulsant effects.15 The synthetic allopregnanolone derivative alphaxalone (4) acts as a general anesthetic,6 but was withdrawn from clinical use due to anaphylactoid side effects associated with its ethoxylated castor oil formulation.7 Currently, alphaxalone is used in veterinary medicine8 and there is strong interest in restoring the clinical use of this and structurally related drugs.9,10 More broadly, analogs of endogenous neurosteroids are of interest as potential drugs for treatment of epilepsy, anxiety, mood disorders and depression, and as probes for interrogation of GABAAR pharmacology.11

Chart 1.

Chart 1.

Structures of anesthetic steroids (1-4) and their photoaffinity analogs (5-16) used to probe GABAAR binding sites.

Pharmacological studies show the GABAAR binding site(s) for neuroactive steroids differ from those of GABA and benzodiazepines, which bind to homologous sites at subunit interfaces in the extracellular domain (ECD), or of other intravenous general anesthetics including propofol, barbiturates, and etomidate, which bind to homologous sites at subunit interfaces in the extracellular third of the transmembrane domain (TMD).4,1214 In recent crystal structures of chimeric homo–pentameric receptors containing GABAAR α subunit TMDs, pregnanolone and THDOC bound to a subunit interface site, whereas the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate (PS) bound to a distinct intrasubunit site.15,16 Both the latter sites are near the cytoplasmic end of the TMD and in close proximity to a residue previously photolabeled by 6-azipregnanolone (5) in homomeric β3 GABAARs.17

An advantage of photolabeling with tritiated photoprobes followed by microsequencing with Edman degradation is the ability to both identify the photolabeled amino acids and to quantify photoincorporation which enables assessment of pharmacological specificity and allosteric interactions with other ligands. For example, tritium-labeled photoreactive analogs of etomidate, mephobarbital, and propofol have identified multiple binding sites in purified α1β3 and α1β3γ2L GABAARs (Figure 1),1820 and were useful in photolabeling protection studies that compared other drug’s relative affinity for these sites. Multiple steroid photolabels 5–11, incorporating photoreactive groups at various positions on the steroid backbone, have been tested in GABAARs.17,21 However, to date no tritiated steroid photolabels have proven useful in such protection studies at steroid binding sites. Previously, we developed tritiated allopregnanolone analogs 12 and 13 containing photoreactive substituents at the 11-position, which were potent anesthetics and GABAAR modulators, but their photoincorporation in GABAARs was not inhibited by other steroid modulators.22

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Locations of binding sites for GABA, benzodiazepines, and general anesthetics in an (α1)2(β3)2γ2 GABAAR. GABA binds in the extracellular domain at the interfaces between the β and α subunits referred to as the β+– α subunit interface, and with that nomenclature continued, the benzodiazepines bind to a homologous site at the α+– γ subunit interface. Depicted in the transmembrane domain are the four transmembrane helices (M1–M4) in each subunit, the homologous binding sites for etomidate and R-mTFD-MPAB, a mephobarbital analog, in the extracellular third of the β+– α and α+/γ+– β subunit interfaces, respectively, and binding sites for neurosteroids in the intracellular third of the β+– α subunit interfaces.

Our goal in this study was to develop additional anesthetic steroid photolabels suitable for photolabeling the modulatory binding sites in typical heteropentameric receptors. We hypothesized that the upper edge of the steroid framework, where our C-11 photolabels were located, projected out of the binding site, perhaps facing towards the lipids.22 Consequently, in this work, we placed the photoreactive residues on the opposite edge of the steroid (C-6), where previous studies on the β3 homomer had been successful,17,21 and on the steroid side-chain (C17 of the framework). Here, we report the synthesis of three neurosteroid analogs equipped with diazirines located at C-6 or C-21 (14-16) that act as positive allosteric modulators of heteropentameric α1β3 and α1β3γ2L receptors. We found that tritiated compound 16 (21-pTFDBzox-AP) photoincorporated with pharmacological specificity into full-length human α1β3 and α1β3γ2L GABAARs. In addition, photolabeling was inhibited by other neurosteroid enhancers at concentrations close to their modulatory EC50 values, but not by the inhibitory neurosteroid pregnenolone sulfate, nor by etomidate, or a potent barbiturate anesthetic.

RESULTS

Synthesis of 6-azi-3α-hydroxy-5β-pregnane-11,20-dione (14, 6-azi-OP), 6-azi-3α-hydroxy-5α-allopregnane-11,20-dione (15, 6-azi-OAP) and 21-(p-trifluoromethyldiazirynylbenzoxy)allopregnanolone (16, 21-pTFDBzox-AP).

The 10-step synthesis of compounds 14 and 15 shown in Scheme 1 started from the commercially available 11α-hydroxyprogesterone 17. 11α-Hydroxyprogesterone 17 was first protected at both the 3- and 20-positions to form the diketal 18. During this process, under strong acid catalysis, the double bond migrated to the position 5. The double bond was hydroborated with BH3-THF23 and the product oxidized in two steps, first with hydrogen peroxide and then with pyridine chlorochromate to form the diketone 19. The 6-ketone moiety was converted into a diazirine using the one-pot, five-step diazirination procedure suitable for sterically hindered ketones, as described earlier.22 In the course of this procedure, the original 5β−6-ketone 19 was partially isomerized into a 5α-isomer, and hence the product constituted the mixture of pregnanolone and allopregnanolone diazirines (20 and 21, respectively). The subsequent deprotection step provided the mixture of triketones 22 and 23 that was separated by flash chromatography, and each isomer subjected to the reduction at the 3-position. To choose a stereoselective reducing agent, we needed to establish configurations of the substrates 22 and 23 at carbon 5, however, the complexity of their NMR spectra made that assignment unreliable. We, therefore, obtained the crystals of the compound 22 and determined its structure by x-ray crystallography. The structure clearly shows the 5β-configuration and the cis-fusion of rings A and B for this compound (Figure 2, we were unable to obtain well-diffracting crystals of compound 23, 14 and 15).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of photoprobes 6-azi-11-oxo-allopregnanolone (14, 6-azi-OAP) and 6-azi-11-oxo-pregnanolone (15, 6-azi-OP).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

ORTEP drawing of the x-ray structure of compound 22.

Due to steric hindrance in compound 22, the stereoselective reduction of its 3-keto group into the 3α-product 14 (6-azi-OP) was possible using sodium borohydride. In contrast, the reduction of allopregnanolone diazirine 23 into a 3α-product could be carried out using the sterically hindered reducing agent, K-selectride,24 to provide the final photoprobe 15 (6-azi-OAP). Reductions of diketones 22 and 23 occurred exclusively at the 3-position, due to the highly hindered environment at the 11-position.22 The configurations of the final compounds 14 and 15 at C-3 were ascertained based on their 1H NMR spectra.

The synthesis of the pTFD-benzoyl derivative of THDOC 16 is shown in Scheme 2. THDOC (3), synthesized by oxidation of the silyl enol ether derived from pregnanolone 1 by m-chloroperbenoic acid, as described earlier,25 was coupled with 4-(trifluoromethyldiazirynyl)benzoic acid (24) using EDC and DMAP in methylene chloride to provide the ester 16. In order to obtain the tritiated photoprobe 16, THDOC was coupled with 3-iodo-4-TFD-benzoic acid (25), and the product 26 was reduced with hydrogen gas over palladium catalyst26 to produce 16 (21-pTFDBzox-AP). Using the same methodology, reduction of 26 with tritium gas was then performed by ViTrax Company (Placenta, CA) to afford compound 3H-16 with 15 Ci/mmol specific radioactivity.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Synthesis of 21-(p-trifluoromethyldiazirinylbenzoxy)-allopregnanolone (21-pTFDBzox-AP, 16) and [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP (3H-16).

Anesthetic properties of 21-pTFDBzox-AP.

No LoRR was observed when tadpoles were exposed to the following concentrations of 21-pTFDBzox-AP (μM, number of animals): 1, 5; 2, 15; 3, 15 and 10, 5. The concentration-response curve of alphaxalone was determined alone and in the constant presence of 2.5 or 10 μM 21-pTFDBzox-AP (55, 25 and 40 animals, respectively). The response to alphaxalone stabilized between 30 and 60 minutes, and was constant thereafter. Responses were recorded after 60 minutes equilibration. The EC50 of alphaxalone alone was found to be 1.4 ± 0.3 μM and the slope of the curve was 3.1 ± 1.2. This is consistent with the published EC50s of 1 to 2 μM and slopes 1.7 to 3.4.22,27 21-pTFDBzox-AP at 2.5μM caused a small shift of anesthetic EC50 of alphaxalone from 1.4 ± 0.3 to 0.92 ± 0.3 μM, which was significant (F-test, F=8.174, p=0.005). However, the shift with 10 μM to 1.3 ± 0.3 μM was not significant (F=0.062, p=0.798). When the data from the two sets were combined, the shift to 1.2 ± 0.2 μM was not significant (F=2.152, p=0.145). Overall, it was clear that there is no significant antagonism of alphaxalone’s action by 21-pTFDBzox-AP and that a sub–anesthetic contribution to alphaxalone’s anesthetic effect could not be established with confidence. Due to very small amounts of 6-azi-OP and 6-azi-OAP available, these compounds were not tested for their anesthetic properties.

Enhancement of GABAA Receptor Currents by 6-azi-OP, 6-azi-OAP and 21-pTFDBzox-AP.

In voltage clamp electrophysiology studies of human α1β3γ2L GABAAR expressed in Xenopus oocytes, EC5 GABA-activated chloride currents were potentiated by 6-azi-OAP and 6-azi-OP up to 10.1 ± 0.67 and 8.0 ± 1.4 - fold, respectively (Figure 3). The maximum concentration tested for both compounds was 100 μM, which appeared to establish a plateau effect for 6-azi-OAP, but not for 6-azi-OP. Fits of the data to Eq. 1 (see Materials and Methods) were difficult. Figure 2B shows a lower limit estimate of the EC50s by assuming a Hill coefficient of 1.45 (based on the analysis of [3H]muscimol binding modulation data below). With this assumption, the lower limit estimates of the EC50 values are 22 ± 1.3 and 13 ± 1.1 μM for 6-azi-OP and 6-azi-OAP, respectively. Consistent with this analysis, 10 μM 6-azi-OAP produced significantly higher enhancement than 6-azi-OP (p = 0.048).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Modulation of GABA-induced currents in α1β3γ2L GABAAR by 6-azi-OP and 6-azi-OAP. (A) 6-Azi-OAP and 6-azi-OP enhance EC5 GABA (4 μM) currents in WT α1β3γ2L GABAAR– expressing Xenopus oocytes. Example traces are shown from electrophysiological experiments, each set in a single oocyte. (B) Concentration dependence of the enhancements ratios for 6-azi-OP and 6-azi-OAP. Points represent mean ± sem (6-azi-OAP; filled circles; n = 3–4 and 6-azi-OP; filled squares; n = 3–5). Lines through data represent non-linear least-squares fits to Equation (1).

In contrast, our third photolabel, 21-pTFDBzox-AP, only weakly enhanced GABA EC5 and EC10 activation of α1β3γ2L and α1β3 receptors, respectively (Figure 4). At the highest concentration tested, 10 μM, 2.1± 0.4-fold enhancement of EC10 GABA-activated α1β3 currents was observed (Figure 4A). Because no enhancement plateau was identified at 10 μM, the Hill coefficient was constrained to 1.7 in logistic fits (based on [3H]muscimol binding data), resulting in a lower limit EC50 of 2.7±0.5 μM. In α1β3γ2L receptors activated with EC5 GABA, 10 μM 21-pTFDBzox-AP (Figure 3) produced similar enhancement (2.6 ± 0.3-fold; n = 6) to that in α1β3 receptors. In comparison, THDOC at 10 μM enhanced α1β3γ2L receptor activation 16 ± 2.1-fold (Figure 4B), whereas alphaxalone at 10 μM enhanced α1β3 receptor activation 10.6-fold (not shown). Incorporation of the α1Q242W mutation, which is known to ablate neurosteroid modulation in GABAARs,4,28 eliminated positive modulation by both THDOC and 21-pTFDBzox-AP (Figure 4B). In spontaneously gating α1264Tβ3γ2L receptors, 2 μM 21-pTFDBzox-AP directly increased inward current in the absence of GABA (Figure 4C) by about 50%.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(A) 21-pTFDBzox-AP enhances EC10 (1 μM GABA) currents in α1β3 and EC5 (4 μM GABA) currents in α1β3γ2L GABAARs expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Enhancement ratio is defined as IEC10 (GABA + 21-pTFDBzox-AP) / IEC10 (GABA). The inset shows example traces from a single oocyte. Plotted symbols represent mean ± sem (n = 4). The line through data was generated by fitting to Equation (1). Hill slopes of both dose-response curves were constrained to 1.7 (fitted value from the [3H]muscimol binding assay). Without nH constraint, maximal enhancement and EC50 were indeterminate. Fitted parameters for α1β3 are: maximal enhancement ratio = +2.1 ± 0.4; EC50 = 2.7 ± 0.5 μM. Fitted parameters for α1β3γ2L are: maximal enhancement ratio = +2.6 ± 0.3; EC50 = 3.0 ± 0.7 μM. (B) 21-pTFDBzox-AP enhancement of α1β3γ2L receptor gating is eliminated by the steroid site mutation α1Q242W. Bars represent mean ± sem (n = 4 each) enhancement ratios normalized to EC5 GABA (4 μM) responses in the same oocyte. Tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone (THDOC) and 21-pTFDBzox-AP were both applied at 10 μM. Both steroids significantly enhanced gating of WT α1β3γ2L receptors (compared to 1.0 in two-tailed t-test; p = 0.0056 for THDOC and p = 0.015 for 21-pTFDBzox-AP), but did not significantly enhance gating of α1Q242Wβ3γ2L receptors (p = 0.54 for THDOC and p = 0.057 for 21-pTFDBzox-AP). Unpaired Student’s t-tests showed significantly different enhancement in WT vs. αQ242W with both THDOC (n=4; p =0.0007) and 21-pTFDBzox-AP (n=4; p= 0.0015). (C) 21-pTFDBzox-AP at 2 μM directly activated currents in oocytes expressing the spontaneously gating receptor mutant α1L264Tβ3γ2L. Bars represent mean ± sem (n = 4). 21-pTFDBzox-AP at 2 μM elicited approximately 21% of the maximal GABA response (p = 0.0012 by paired t-test). Picrotoxin at 2 mM produced outward currents averaging about 40% of maximal GABA-induced inward currents.

Left-Shifts of the GABA Dose-Response Curves.

Both 6-azi-OAP and 6-azi-OP photoprobe interactions with α1β3γ2L receptors produced leftward shifts of the GABA concentration – response curve (Figure 5). The GABA EC50 decreased approximately 3-fold in the presence of 15 μM 6-azi-OAP (Figure 5A) or 30 μM 6-azi-OP (Figure 5B). The effect of 15 μM 6-azi-OAP on GABA dose-response curves was similar in the case of α1β3 receptor (not shown). Consistent with the low efficacy of 21-pTFDBzox-AP enhancement of GABAAR currents, this reagent at 5 μM did not reduce the GABA EC50 (Figure 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

6-azi-OAP (A) and 6-azi-OP (B) shift GABA dose-response curve to the left in α1β3γ2L GABAAR– expressing Xenopus oocytes. 6-azi-OAP (15 μM) shifted the fitted EC50 value approximately three-fold, from 25 ± 1.0 to 9.1 ± 1.1 μM (sum-of squares F test for logEC50, F=53.45, p<0.0001). 6-azi-OP (30 μM) also shifted the fitted EC50 value approximately 3.5-fold, from 59 ± 1.0 to 17 ± 1.0 μM. (Sum-of squares F test for logEC50, F=302.4, p<0.0001). 21-pTFDBzox-AP (C) did not shift the GABA dose response curve in WT α1β3γ2L-expressing oocytes (sum-of squares F test for logEC50, F=0.1808, p=0.6730).

Modulation of Muscimol Binding to GABAA Receptors by 6-azi-OP, 6-azi-OAP and 21-pTFDBzox-AP.

To additionally characterize the allosteric action, we compared the abilities of the three agents to modulate the binding of 2 nM [3H]muscimol to α1β3γ2 and α1β3 GABAARs (Figure 6). Displaceable binding of [3H]muscimol to α1β3γ2 GABAARs was enhanced in a concentration – dependent manner by both 6-azi-OP and 6-azi-AOP between 1 μM and 100 μM, above which it leveled off (Figure 6A). The potencies of 6-azi-OAP, 6-azi-OP were similar, with EC50 = 25 ± 2.5 and 37 ± 1.7, respectively, and the Hill coefficients were nH = 1.3 ± 0.15 and 1.6 ± 0.1, respectively. The efficacies of the modulation were 330 ± 9% and 241 ± 3% for 6-azi-OAP and 6-azi-OP, respectively. The enhancement by 21-pTFDBzox-AP was studied in more detail using both GABAARs in membranes and in detergent/lipid micelles after purification (Figure 6B and 6C, respectively). In α1β3γ2L GABAARs, 21-pTFDBzox-AP was a more potent enhancer than either 6-azi-OP or 6-azi-OAP, with EC50 = 0.52 ± 0.25 and 0.50 ± 0.06 μM in membranes and in detergent/lipid micelles, respectively, with corresponding Hill coefficients nH = 1.09 ± 0.22 and 1.15 ± 0.36, respectively. For α1β3 GABAAR, EC50 = 0.36 ± 0.06 and 0.16 ± 0.03 μM in membranes and in detergent/lipid micelles, respectively, with corresponding Hill coefficients nH = 1.71 ± 0.10 and 1.45 ± 0.51, respectively. In addition, the maximal enhancement registered in membranes and in detergent/lipid micelles was 199 ± 30 and 135 ± 1% for α1β3γ2 GABAAR, respectively, whereas it was 271 ± 7 and 172 ± 6%, respectively, for α1β3 GABAAR. The data shown in Table 1 indicate that in terms of potency and maximal effect, the modulatory property of 21-pTFDBzox-AP was in line with those of most other neurosteroid enhancers. As 6-azi-OP and 6-azi-OAP were both low potency ligands, whereas 21-pTFDBzox-AP was significantly more potent, we tritiated 21-pTFDBzox-AP and used this ligand in the photolabeling experiments.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Steroid photolabels enhance agonist binding in a concentration – dependent manner. Typical experiments for steroid modulation of a subsaturating concentration (2 nM) of [3H]muscimol binding are shown. (A) Both 6-azi-OP and 6-azi-OP efficaciously modulate [3H]muscimol binding to α1β3γ2L receptors, but with relatively low potency. 6-Azi-OAP was slightly more efficacious and potent than 6-azi-OP. Nonlinear least squares fitting to the Hill equation yielded EC50 values, Hill coefficients and maximum effects that are given in the text. (B) 21-pTFDBzox-AP enhances [3H]muscimol binding to α1β3 receptors with higher efficacy but comparable potency to α1β3γ2L receptors. (C) A similar pattern is observed in receptors reconstituted into CHAPS:Asolectin (5 mM: 200 μM), although the efficacy is lower.

Table 1.

Comparison of potency of various steroid ligands as modulators of 2 nM [3H]muscimol binding [EC50] and as inhibitors of photolabeling of GABAARs with [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP [IC50].

Steroid ligand Stereo-chemistry EC50 [μM] SD (±) IC50c,d SD (±)
21-pTFDBzox-APa,b 3α,5α 0.52 0.25 ND
21-pTFDBzox-APa,c 3α,5α 0.50 0.06 ND
21-pTFDBzox-APd,b 3α,5α 0.36 0.06 ND
21-pTFDBzox-APd,c 3α,5α 0.16 0.03 0.15 0.02
6-Azi-OPa 3α,5β 37 1.7 >100
6-Azi-OAPa 3α,5α 25 2.5 44 6
Allopregnanoloned,b 3α,5α 0.58 0.22
Pregnanoloned,b 3α,5β 0.62 0.08 0.7 0.13
Alphaxaloned,b 3α,5α 0.71 0.09 6 0.1
THDOCd,b 3α,5α 1.00 0.15 2.3 0.35
Pregnenolone sulfate >500 No effect
a

α1β3γ2L receptor;

b

native membranes;

c

purified receptor preparation;

d

α1β3 receptor. The EC50 for alphaxalone was previously reported in reference 22.

GABAA Receptor Photolabeling by 21-pTFDBzox-AP and Its Inhibition by Neurosteroid Modulators.

We first determined the effect of 30 μM allopregnanolone on [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP (0.8 μM) photolabeling of purified α1β3 and α1β3γ2 GABAARs in the absence or presence of bicuculline (BIC, 100 μM, resting state) or GABA (300 μM, desensitized state). Photoincorporation was characterized by SDS-PAGE, with 3H incorporation determined by fluorography (Figure 7A, α1β3, lanes 1,3–6; α1β3γ2L, lanes 2, 7–10) or by liquid scintillation counting of excised gel bands containing GABAAR subunits (Figure 7B). In both α1β3 and α1β3γ2L GABAARs, [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP was incorporated into the three gel bands revealed by Coomassie Blue stain (lanes 1 and 2), a band of 56-kDa, containing (by sequence analysis) primarily the α1 and γ2 subunits, and bands of 59- and 61-kDa containing primarily β3 subunits.19 The levels of photoincorporation were similar in the presence of GABA and bicuculline, and were strongly reduced by addition of allopregnanolone. Based upon liquid scintillation counting (Figure 6B), 30 μM allopregnanolone reduced β subunit photolabeling by 60% and 70% in α1β3 and α1β3γ2 GABAARs, respectively. The 600 3H cpm of inhibitable β subunit photolabeling indicates photolabeling of ~2% of β subunits, based upon the ~ 2 pmol of GABAAR loaded on each gel lane and the radiochemical specific activity of [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP (15 Ci/mmol). This efficiency of photolabeling is close to the 9% efficiency seen for the photoreactive mephobarbital analog [3H]R-mTFD-MPAB that contains the same photoreactive group.29 Inhibitable photolabeling by allopregnanolone in the α/γ-subunit gel band was less than 15% the amount in the β subunit gel bands.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Allopreganolone inhibits [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP photolabeling of α1β3 and α1β3γ2 GABAARs. (A) Aliquots of α1β3 (lanes 1, 3–6) and α1β3γ2 GABAAR (lanes 2, 7–10) were equilibrated with 0.8 μM [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP in the presence of 100 μM bicuculline (BIC) or 300 μM GABA, with (+) or without (−) 30 μM allopregnanolone (3α,5α-P). After irradiation, the aliquots were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and the gel was stained with Coomassie Blue (lanes 1 and 2, representative lanes). The stained gel was then prepared for fluorography (lanes 3–10), dried and exposed to film for 21 days. Denoted on the left are the mobilities of the molecular mass markers and the calculated mobilities of the GABAAR subunit bands (α1, 56 kDa; β3, 59/61 kDa). (B) In a parallel experiment, irradiated samples were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, the stained gel bands containing the α1 and β3 subunits were excised, and 3H incorporation was determined by liquid scintillation counting. The means ±1/2 range are plotted from 2 gels.

To determine the pharmacological specificity of the steroid binding site identified by [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP photolabeling of α1β3 GABAARs, we examined the effects of other anesthetic and non-anesthetic steroids as well as etomidate and the mephobarbital analog R-mTFD-MPAB, anesthetics and GABAAR positive allosteric modulators that bind with high affinity and selectivity to homologous sites at β+–α, the γ+–β and α+–β subunit interfaces in the α1β3γ2L GABAAR transmembrane domain.19 Two anesthetic steroids, pregnanolone (3α,5β-P) and 3α,5α-THDOC, at high concentrations, inhibited photolabeling to the same extent (by 60%) as 30 μM allopregnanolone, with the concentration dependence of inhibition characterized by IC50s of 0.7 ± 0.13 μM and 2.3 ± 0.35 μM, respectively (Figure 8A and Table 1). In contrast, no inhibition of photolabeling was seen in the presence of the antagonist steroid pregnenolone sulfate (PS) at 100 μM, nor in the presence of R-mTFD-MPAB at 60 μM or etomidate at 1 mM (Figure 7A). Non-radioactive 21-pTFDBzox-AP itself was a potent inhibitor of photolabeling (IC50 = 0.15 ± 0.02 μM), and alphaxalone (IC50 = 6 ± 1 μM) bound to this site with higher affinity than 6-azi-OAP (IC50 = 44 ± 6 μM), while 6-azi-OP inhibited with only low potency (IC50 > 100 μM) (Figure 8B). For each steroid, the concentration dependence of inhibition was characterized by a Hill coefficient close to 1 (not shown).

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Pharmacological specificity of [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP photolabeling of α1β3 GABAAR. Aliquots of GABAARs were photolabeled in the presence of the indicated concentrations of anesthetic steroids (3α,5β-P, 3α,5α-THDOC, alphaxalone, 6-AziOP, 6-AziOAP, and 21-pTFDBzox-AP), the antagonist steroid pregnenolone sulfate (PS), etomidate, or the mephobarbital analog, R-mTFD-MPAB. Covalent incorporation of radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting of β3 subunits isolated by SDS-PAGE. For each experiment, 3H cpm incorporation was normalized to total cpm incorporated in the absence of competitor, and the plotted data are the means (± SD) from 4 independent experiments. The concentration dependence of inhibition was fit to a single site model with variable Hill coefficient (see Methods), with the non-specific subunit photolabeling determined in the presence of 30 μM allopregnanolone (3α,5α-P). Non-specific photolabeling, which varied between experiments with different purifications of GABAAR, was 38 ± 3% for the data of Panel A (dotted line), and in Panel B it was 13 ± 2% for 21-pTFDBzox-AP, 27 ± 2% for alphaxalone, and 22 ± 6% for 6-AziOAP and 6-AziOP.

DISCUSSION

In our previous work we have described two allopregnanolone derivatives, 11-F4N3Bzox-AP (12) and 11-azi-AP (13), that displayed potent positive modulatory properties and efficiently photolabeled GABAARs.22 However, the photolabeling by these reagents was not inhibited by other neurosteroids, and hence was not site-specific. The most important result of this report is the successful design of a photoreactive neurosteroid analog 21-pTFDBzox-AP (16) that meets the following criteria: (i) It is a potent, albeit low-efficacy, allosteric modulator of human heteromeric GABAA receptors. (ii) It photolabels GABAARs in a pharmacologically specific manner, as evidenced by the observed inhibition of photolabeling at the subunit level by other positive steroid modulators, but not by steroid antagonists nor by ligands such as etomidate and R-mTFD-MPAB, which act at separate sites. (iii) Its photoincorporation is not strongly dependent on the presence or absence of GABA, which is consistent with the low efficacy with which it positively modulates currents induced by low concentrations of GABA. (iv) Lastly, the modulation of GABA currents by 21-pTFDBzox-AP is completely eliminated by the α1Q242W mutation suggesting that this ligand binds in the same site as that of other neurosteroids.4,28,30

We compared the potency of common steroids to inhibit the photoincorporation of [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP into its site (IC50) with their potency for enhancing the binding of the agonist [3H]muscimol (EC50), a measure of desensitization (Table 1). These experiments were carried out with heteromeric, human full-length, glycosylated GABAARs with subunit composition α1β3 and α1β3γ2L. In neither case, did the presence of the γ2-subunit exert a major influence on the results, so we pursued more detailed studies with α1β3 receptors. For 3α,5α-steroids: THDOC (3), alphaxalone (4), 6-Azi-OAP (6) and 21-pTFDBzox-AP itself (16), 3α,5β-steroid (pregnanolone, 1) and 6-azi-OP (5), the agreement between IC50 and EC50 was very good. Furthermore, pregnenolone sulfate, a 3β-steroid that inhibits GABA currents,31 neither bound to the 21-pTFDBzox-AP site nor enhanced desensitization. Considering that the binding studies were carried out in much more dilute suspensions than the photolabeling studies, we regard the pharmacological evidence establishing that photoincorporation was occurring in the site that was responsible for enhancing desensitization to be strong.

Photoincorporation of 21-pTFDBzox-AP occurred predominantly in the β3 subunit, very modestly in the α1 subunit and not at all in the γ2 subunit. These observations taken together with the sensitivity of 21-pTFDBzox-AP enhancement of GABA currents to the α1 M1 mutation Q242W4 suggest that the 21-pTFDBzox-AP binding site is in the β3+ – α1 subunit interface. Support for steroid interaction on the β+ side of the interface comes from two studies. First, Chen et al,17 using β3 homopentamers and the photolabel 5 (6-AziP) identified β3 F301 on the third transmembrane helix M3, on the plus side of the β– β interface, as a photoincorporation site, but were unable to establish its pharmacological specificity. Second, a recent substituted cysteine and modification of protection (SCAMP) protocol mapped alphaxalone–contacting residues to the cytoplasmic end of the β3-subunit’s M3, including β3 F301 in α1β3γ2L receptors.30 Unfortunately, α1 M1 Q242W, on the minus side of the β3+ – α1 subunit interface, is not amenable to SCAMP studies, so evidence for this interface in heteromeric receptors rests largely on the original mutagenesis study.

However, two recent crystallography studies probed interactions of a number of natural steroid ligands with the transmembrane domain of α1 and α5 subunits in the unnatural homomeric chimeras consisting of GLIC ECD – human α1 TMD15 and human β3 ECD – α5 TMD.16 These studies show that steroids bind at the cytoplasmic end of the transmembrane domain in the α+ – α subunit interface. Of particular interest, the 3α hydroxyls of THDOC (3) and pregnanolone (1) form a hydrogen bond with α1 Q242 and α5 Q245 on M1 on the minus side of the interface.15,16 This glutamine is conserved in all six α-subunits but is a tryptophan in the β3 and γ2, and indeed in all other GABAAR subunits. This suggests that the α interaction may be required for high affinity steroid interaction, but the β3 homopentamer photolabeling study implies that this requirement is not absolute. The effective concentrations could not be established in the structural studies because the THDOC enhancement curve for the GLIC ECD – human α1 TMD chimera does not saturate, and the β3 ECD – α5 TMD receptor was spontaneously open. Finally, in the GLIC ECD – human α1 TMD study,15 the inhibitory steroid pregnanolone sulfate interacted only with the transmembrane domain of the α1 subunit and its binding pocket did not overlap with that of THDOC, an observation that is consistent with our finding that pregnenolone sulfate does not bind to the 21-pTFDBzox-AP site.

In our previous steroid photolabeling study,22 we found that photolabeling of α1β3γ2 receptor by ligands 12 and 13 was not inhibited by other steroid ligands. We noted that the photoactive moieties had limited mobility relative to the steroid backbone, leading us to hypothesize that the steroid backbone of those photolabels binds with its upper edge pointing out of the binding site, as previously suggested.32 In this work, we found that substitutions on the lower side of the ring (compounds 14 and 15) caused a significant loss of potency, suggesting that the lower edge of the steroid backbone binds with its receptor site so that even modest substitutions in the 6-position disrupt binding. Consequently, compounds 6 and 14, which have a diazirine on the upper and lower side of the steroid ring system respectively, modulate agonist binding with potencies of 0.25 and 12 μM, respectively. The crystallography studies referred to above are quite consistent with this binding pose of steroids in their site.

CONCLUSIONS

We have synthesized and characterized the first steroid photolabel, 21-pTFDBzox-AP, to photoincorporate into heteromeric human GABAARs with pharmacological specificity. It neither binds in the etomidate site nor the R–mTFD-MPAB site, which are at the extracellular end of the transmembrane domain β+ – α and γ+ – β subunit interfaces, respectively. It photolabels almost exclusively into the β-subunit, and based on the evidence discussed above likely binds in the β+ – α interface. Most imortantly, [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP is well positioned to quantitatively probe binding of ligands to the steroid site in human GABAARs of any subunit composition (see for example Table 1) in a way that crystallography and mass spectrometry (a least to date) would find difficult.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials.

11α-Hydroxy-progesterone 16 was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Allopregnanolone [5α-pregnan-3α-ol-20-one (3α,5α-P)], alphaxalone (5α-pregnan-3α-ol-11,20-dione), and etomidate were from Tocris Bioscience, and 5α-pregnan-3α, 21-diol-20-one (3α,5α-THDOC) was from Steraloids, Inc. Pregnanolone [5β-pregnan-3α-ol-20-one (3α,5β-P)] was from Research Plus and pregnenolone sulfate (PS) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Bicuculline methochloride was from Abcam. Human α1β3 and 3α,21-Dihydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one 3, TFD-benzoic acids 21 and 22 were prepared according to the known methods.25,26 Anhydrous grade solvents were from Aldrich, and were not further dried or purified. R-mTFD-MPAB was synthesized as described previously.29 α1β3γ2 GABAARs with a FLAG epitope on the N-terminus of α1 subunit were expressed in tetracycline-inducible HEK293S cells and purified from detergent extracts as described18,19,33,34 by use of an anti-FLAG antibody column. After elution from columns in the presence of 0.1 mM FLAG peptide, purified GABAARs were stored at −80C until use in elution buffer containing 5 mM CHAPS and 0.2 mM asolectin.

Analytical Chemistry.

1H, 13C and 19F NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance spectrometer at 400 MHz, 100 MHz and 376 MHz, respectively, unless otherwise noted. NMR chemicals shifts were referenced indirectly to TMS for 1H and 13C, and CFCl3 for 19F NMR. HRMS experiments were performed with Q-TOF-2TM (Micromass). TLC was performed with Merck 60 F254 silica gel plates. Purity of the final compounds was assessed by HPLC analysis with a Synergy Hydro-RP column (4 μm, 4.60 × 150 mm) using methanol and methanol-water (1:1); the gradient applied was from 1% methanol at the start to 99% methanol over 32 min, followed by isocratic elution. Elution was monitored by UV at 254 nm. These HPLC analyses indicated purity greater than 96%.

Anesthetic Properties.

Studies of anesthetic properties of the synthesized ligands were conducted in tadpoles according to an animal protocol preapproved by the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Subcommittee on Research Animal Care (Protocol #2006N000124). Tris buffer (2.5 mM) was used for these experiments – 100 mL of buffer (2.5 mM) per 5 tadpoles per glass beaker. Drugs were added from DMSO stock solutions (final DMSO 0.2%). The tadpoles were tested for loss of righting reflexes (LoRR) after being exposed to the drug solution for 1 hour, and responses were recorded as having LoRR (1) or not having LoRR (0). A bent Pasteur pipette was used to flip the animal over. If the animal remained inverted for longer than 5 seconds, it was considered to have LoRR. The tadpoles were then transferred to recovery beakers containing de-chlorinated water for 24 hours. In these experiments all tadpoles were alive after 24 hours. Tadpoles were killed immediately at the end of each protocol by immersion in a lethal concentration of pentobarbital (1 mM).

Electrophysiology of GABAA Receptors.

Female Xenopus laevis frogs were housed in a veterinarian-supervised facility and used with MGH IACUC approval (Protocol #2010N000002) as a source of oocytes for electrophysiology. Stage V oocytes were harvested via mini-laparotomy from frogs anesthetized in 0.15% tricaine. Efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

GABAAR coding DNA sequences for α1, β3, γ2L, and mutant α1L264T and α1Q242W subunits were cloned into pCDNA3.1 plasmids, which were linearized before use as templates in synthesizing capped mRNAs, as previously described.35 Up to 10 ng total messenger RNA mixtures (1:1 ratio for αβ and 1:1:3 ratio for αβγ) were injected into oocytes, which were incubated for at least 24 hours before use in electrophysiological experiments.

Electrophysiological studies on oocyte-expressed GABAARs were performed at 20–22°C, as previously described.30 Oocytes were placed in a custom low-volume (30 μL) flow chamber, impaled with two borosilicate microelectrodes filled with 3 M KCl (resistance < 1 MΩ), and voltage clamped at −50 mV (OC-725, Warner Instruments). Oocyte superfusion at 2–3 mL/min with ND96-based solutions (in mM: 96 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 0.8 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4) containing GABA or steroids alone or in combination was controlled using computer-actuated valves (VC-8, Warner Instruments) and polytetrafluoroethylene micro-manifold (MP-8, Warner Instruments) and tubing. Currents (OC-725) were filtered at 1 kHz, digitized at 100 Hz (Digidata 1322, Molecular Devices) and recorded on a PC running ClampEx 8.0 software (Molecular Devices). Amplitudes of recorded currents were calculated as peak – baseline.

Drug-dependent gating enhancement in spontaneously-gating α1L264Tβ3γ2L receptors was studied using without GABA. In α1β3 and α1β3γ2L receptors, enhancement at EC5 or EC10 GABA was assessed. Oocytes were pre-exposed to drug for 30 s prior to exposure to GABA + drug for an additional 30–60 s. Washout in ND96 between steroid exposures was for up to 10 minutes.

GABA-dependent receptor activation in the absence vs. presence of steroids was assessed in the same set of oocytes. Current activations by GABA concentrations ranging from 0.1 μM to 1 mM were recorded, with every second or third recording a 1 mM maximal control for normalization. Current activations at the same GABA concentrations combined with a fixed concentration of steroid drug were then recorded in the same oocyte, with frequent normalizing 1 mM GABA + drug controls.

Analysis of Electrophysiological Data.

Results from repeated measures are reported as mean ± sem. Data from drug-dependent enhancement of EC5–10 GABA responses was analyzed by non-linear least-squares fitting to a logistic function of the form:

Enhancement Ratio = Maximum 1.01+(10(log EC50X)× nH)+1.0 (1)

where X = log(Drug), EC50 = half-maximal concentration, and nH = Hill slope. EC50 is reported as mean with 95% confidence interval for these fits.

Normalized GABA-dependent responses were analyzed by non-linear least-squares fitting to a logistic function of the form:

Normalized Current= Maximum1+(10(logEC50X)× nH) (2)

Statistical comparisons of repeated measures in two sets of results or two ratios of paired experiments were based on Student’s t-tests. Fitted EC50s in the absence vs. presence of drug were compared using sum-of-squares F-tests. All statistical calculations were performed in Prism 5.0. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Allosteric modulation of agonist binding to GABAA receptors.

Human α1β3γ2 GABAARs were expressed in HEK293 TetR cells. Homogenized cell membranes were prepared as described previously33 and 200 μg of α1β3γ2 GABAAR membrane protein was resuspended in 500 μL of assay buffer (10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, and 1 mM EDTA). The suspension was equilibrated with 2 nM [3H]muscimol and various concentrations of steroid at 4°C for 1 h. The nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 mM GABA. The suspension was filtered on GF/B glass fiber filters (Whatman, Schleicher & Schuell, Maidstone, U.K.) that were pretreated in 0.5% w/v polyethyleneimine for 1 h. After receptor application, filters were washed under vacuum with 7 mL of cold assay buffer and dried under a lamp for 30 min. Subsequently, they were equilibrated in Liquiscint (Atlanta, GA) and counted (Tri-Carb 1900, liquid scintillation analyzer, Perkin-Elmer/Packard, Waltham, MA).

Photolabeling of α1β3γ2 and α1β3 GABAARs.

To determine subunit level [3H]21p-TFDBzox-AP incorporation and the pharmacological specificity of photolabeling, GABAAR were photolabeled on an analytical scale (50 μL per gel lane, ~2 pmol [3H]muscimol binding sites). Appropriate volumes of [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP were dried down under a gentle stream of argon gas and resuspended in GABAARs in elution buffer for 30 min, on ice, such that the final concentration range of [3H]21p-TFDBzox-AP was between 0.5 to 1 μM, and 300 μM GABA was added. GABAARs equilibrated with [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP (40 μL) were then aliquoted into glass vials (CERT5000–69LV, ThermoFisher Scientific) already containing 10 μL of GABAAR in elution buffer. The appropriate volume of competitor solution required for the desired final concentration was delivered using a 1 μL syringe (Hamilton 86200). Samples were vortexed and incubated on ice for 45 min. Aliquots were then transferred to 96 well plates (Corning catalog no. 2797) and irradiated using a Spectroline model EN-280L 365nm lamp for 30 min on ice at <1 cm distance from the lamp. Solutions of 3α,5α-P, 3α,5β-P, 3α,5α-THDOC, and alphaxalone dilutions were prepared from 60 mM stock solutions in ethanol. 21-pTFDBzox-AP, 6-AziOAP and 6-AziP dilutions were prepared from 20 mM stocks in DMSO. During labeling, ethanol was present at 0.5 % (v/v). DMSO was present at 0.2 % (v/v) for 21-pTFDBzox-AP and at 0.5 % (v/v) for 6-AziP and 6-AziOAP. GABAAR subunits were separated by SDS-PAGE and the α/γ (56 kDa) and β (59/ 61 kDa) subunit gel bands were identified by Coomassie Blue stain. Gel bands were then either excised to determine subunit incorporation of [3H] 21-pTFDBzox-AP by scintillation counting or analyzed by fluorography as described previously.19 The concentration dependence of inhibition of [3H]21-pTFDBzox-AP photolabeling was fit to the equation:

B(x)=B0Bns1+(xIC50)nH+Bns

where B(x) is the [3H] cpm incorporated in the β3 subunit (59/61 kDa gel bands) at a total inhibitor concentration of x, B0 the incorporation in the absence of inhibitor, Bns the non-specific incorporation in the presence of 30 μM 3α,5α-P, IC50 the total drug concentration that reduces the specific incorporation by 50%, and nH is the Hill coefficient. Data were fit for individual experiments using Sigma Plot (v11, Systat Software Inc.) with IC50 and nH as adjustable parameters. To combine data from individual experiments, 3H incorporation for each experiment at each inhibitor concentration was normalized to incorporation in the absence of inhibitor (as %), and the combined data were fit to the equation. For all fits, the best fit values (±S.E) of the variable parameters are tabulated.

Chemical Synthesis.

3,20-Diethylenedioxy-11α-hydroxy-pregn-5-ene (18).

A mixture of 11α-hydroxy-progesterone 17 (4.96 g, 15 mmol), ethylene glycol (10 mL) and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (10.0 mg) in benzene (70 mL) was refluxed for 5 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and quenched with triethylamine (1.0 mL). The reaction mixture was evaporated and recrystallized from methanol, giving bis-ketal 18 as a white solid (4.105 g, 65%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.40 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.13–3.80 (m, 9H), 2.66–2.47 (m, 2H), 2.36 (dd, J = 11.9, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (dd, J = 14.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 2.02–1.91 (m, 1H), 1.87–1.59 (m, 7H), 1.48–1.33 (m, 2H), 1.29 (s, 3H), 1.26–1.14 (m, 4H), 1.14–1.03 (m, 3H), 0.95–0.88 (m, 1H), 0.79 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.7, 122.0, 111.8, 109.4, 69.2, 65.2, 64.5, 64.3, 63.4, 58.0, 56.8, 55.9, 51.1, 42.7, 42.5, 38.5, 38.2, 31.8, 31.5, 31.3, 24.7, 23.9, 23.3, 18.7, 14.1. HRMS: calculated for C25H39O5 [M+H]+: 419.2797; found: 419.2793.

3,20-Diethylenedioxy-5α-pregnane-6,11-dione (19).

A solution of borane-THF complex (8.0 mL, 1.0 M borane in THF) was added dropwise at room temperature to a stirred solution of 3,20-diketal 18 (837 mg, 2.0 mmol) in THF (16 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. After cooling to 0°C in an ice-water bath, 3 N aqueous sodium hydroxide (6.7 mL) was added dropwise and formed white precipitate. Aqueous hydrogen peroxide (50%, 4.0 mL) was then added, and the cloudy dispersion clarified. The ice-water bath was removed and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1.5 h. Ethyl acetate (40 mL) was added and layers were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (40 mL×3). The combined organic layer was dried by anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (pretreated with triethylamine) using hexane - ethyl acetate (1:2) to give 6,11-diol as white solid. A mixture of pyridinium chlorochromate (1.191 g, 5.5 mmol) and celite (1.191 g) in dichloromethane (15 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. Sodium acetate (906 mg, 11 mmol) was added and the above 6,11-diol in dichloromethane (4.0 mL) was added dropwise. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The brown suspension was filtered with celite and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (treated with triethylamine) using hexane and ethyl acetate (1:1) to give 6,11-diketone 19 as white solid (446 mg, 52%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.06–3.80 (m, 8H), 2.79 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 2.73–2.58 (m, 2H), 2.43–2.21 (m, 4H), 2.18–2.01 (m, 2H), 1.96–1.78 (m, 4H), 1.77–1.59 (m, 2H), 1.57–1.50 (m, 2H), 1.43–1.30 (m, 1H), 1.31–1.13 (m, 4H), 1.07 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 211.3, 209.7, 111.0, 107.5, 64.8, 64.4, 63.2, 58.9, 57.7, 56.8, 56.0, 49.8, 46.3, 42.5, 37.2, 37.1, 34.8, 32.6, 30.7, 24.3, 23.5, 23.1, 14.1. HRMS: calculated for C25H36NaO6 [M+Na]+: 455.2410; found: 455.2390.

6-Azi-5α-pregnane-3,11,20-trione (22) and 6-Azi-5α-pregnane-3,11,20-trione (23).

The reaction mixture of hydroxylamine hydrochloride (174 mg, 2.5 mmol) and sodium bicarbonate (252 mg, 3.0 mmol) in methanol (5.0 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 0.5 h. 6,11-Diketone 19 (433 mg, 1.0 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The mixture was filtered and concentrated under vacuum giving oxime. The foregoing crude oxime was dissolved in dichloromethane (5.0 mL) and sodium nitrite (414 mg, 6.0 mmol) was added, followed by glacial acetic acid (0.43 mL). After 1 h, another portion of glacial acetic acid (0.43 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was quenched with 5% sodium bicarbonate (10 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (20 mL×3). The combined organic phase was dried by anhydrous sodium sulfate, concentrated under vacuum, giving nitrozo-oxime as a pale yellow solid. The above nitrozo-oxime was dissolved in methanol (4.0 mL), cooled to −50°C, and ammonia in methanol (7 M, 4.5 mL) was added dropwise. The reaction was stirred at 0°C for 1 h, and the resulting yellow solution was concentrated and dried under vacuum, giving an 11-imine. A solution of hydroxylaminesulfonic acid (1.03 g, 9.1 mmol) in methanol (6.0 mL) under argon was cooled to −70°C and diisopropylethylamine (1.6 mL, 9.1 mmol) was added dropwise. The resulting mixture was added dropwise to the above imine at −30°C. After complete addition, the resulting yellow solution was left in a refrigerator for one week. The reaction mixture was first added with sodium bicarbonate (1.00 g) and triethylamine (2.5 mL) followed by finely ground iodine at 0°C until brown color persisted. The excess iodine was reduced with 10% aqueous sodium sulfite, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (40 mL×3). The combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using hexane and ethyl acetate (5:1) to give a mixture of diazirines 20 and 21 (130 mg, 29%). Treatment of the mixture of diazirines (83 mg, 0.19 mmol) with p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (72 mg, 0.38 mmol) in acetone (4 mL) gave crude 6-azi-triketone products. The individual 6-azi-triketone products were isolated after flash chromatography on silica gel using dichloromethane - ethyl acetate (10:1) giving 6-azi-5β-triketone 22 (17 mg, 7.5% from compound 19) and 6-azi-5α-triketone 23 (12 mg, 5.3% from compound 19). 6-Azi-5β-pregnane-3,11,20-trione (22) was a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.82–2.66 (m, 3H), 2.66–2.49 (m, 3H), 2.38 (dd, J = 15.8, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.33–2.17 (m, 4H), 2.14 (s, 3H), 2.01–1.80 (m, 3H), 1.79–1.65 (m, 1H), 1.65–1.53 (m, 1H), 1.49 (s, 3H), 1.38–1.28 (m, 1H), 0.69 (s, 3H), 0.55 (ddd, J = 18.9, 14.0, 4.2 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.7, 208.2, 207.7, 62.1, 56.8, 55.4, 52.0, 50.7, 47.3, 37.4, 36.8, 36.5, 35.3, 35.2, 33.3, 31.4, 27.9, 23.8, 23.6, 22.5, 14.5. HRMS: Calculated for C21H29N2O3 [M+H]+: 357.2178; Found: 357.2164.

6-Azi-5α-pregnane-3,11,20-trione (23) was a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.96–2.81 (m, 1H), 2.79–2.66 (m, 2H), 2.56 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.50–2.35 (m, 1H), 2.34–2.17 (m, 3H), 2.16–2.08 (m, 4H), 2.00–1.63 (m, 5H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.37–1.15 (m, 4H), 0.68 (s, 3H), 0.66–0.59 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.3, 208.2, 207.7, 63.0, 62.1, 56.7, 55.3, 47.3, 46.9, 39.5, 37.8, 37.7, 37.4, 36.5, 35.1, 31.4, 28.4, 23.8, 23.5, 14.5, 12.3. HRMS: calculated for C21H29N2O3 [M+H]+: 357.2178; found: 357.2164.

6-Azi-3α-hydroxy-5β-pregnane-11,20-dione (14).

Sodium borohydride (1.3 mg, 0.034 mmol) in 3.0 mL of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution was added into a stirred solution of 6-azi-5β-triketone 22 (9.0 mg, 0.034 mmol) in ethanol (3.0 mL) at 0°C. The reaction was stirred at 0°C for 3 h. The reaction was quenched with a drop of acetic acid and extracted with ethyl acetate (15 mL×3). The combined organic layer was dried by anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using hexane - ethyl acetate (1:2) to give 6-azi-3α-hydroxy-5β-dione (14) as a colorless oil (8.0 mg, 67%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.60–3.46 (m, 1H), 2.85–2.64 (m, 3H), 2.58 (t, J = 11.8 Hz, 2H), 2.31–2.15 (m, 2H), 2.13 (s, 3H), 2.01–1.78 (m, 4H), 1.78–1.63 (m, 4H), 1.40 (s, 3H), 1.25–1.17 (m, 2H), 0.99 (td, J = 14.4, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 0.64 (s, 3H), 0.43 (dd, J = 14.4, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 0.15 (dd, J = 13.2, 3.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 208.6, 207.7, 70.1, 62.0, 56.8, 55.5, 50.7, 49.2, 47.3, 36.0, 35.2, 33.7, 33.4, 31.6, 31.3, 30.5, 28.5, 23.6, 23.3, 23.0, 14.3. HRMS: Calculated for C21H31N2O3 [M+H]+: 359.2335; Found: 359.2330.

6-Azi-3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnane-11,20-dione (15).

Into the solution of 6-azi-5α-triketone 23 (29 mg, 0.08 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (3.0 mL) was added K-selectride (96 μL, 1.0 M in tetrahydrofuran, 0.096 mmol) at −78°C, and the reaction mixture stirred for 40 min. The reaction was quenched with water and extracted with ethyl acetate (10 mL×3). The combined organic phase was dried by anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using hexane and ethyl acetate (1:2) to produce the mixture of 3α-hydroxy-5α-diketone and 3β-hydroxy-5α-diketone (23 mg). The mixture of 3α- and 3β-isomers was resolved via HPLC: Phenomenex Luna (2) C18 column, 250 × 21.2 mm, 5 μm, with Macherey-Nagel Nucleodur C18 guard column, 16 × 10 mm, 5 μm, using 10 mL/min flow-rate. Gradient conditions: phase A, methanol-water 1:1, phase B, methanol; gradient: 1% B, 0–2 min, then linear gradient to 99% B at 44 min, followed by washing with 99% B for the next 20 min. Fraction collector: 3.0 mL each fraction, starting from 23 min. Detection: UV at 254 and 350 nm wavelength, the pure diazirine fractions were identified by the characteristic absorption at 350 nm, that is about 2 times greater than that at 254 nm. Under those conditions the retention times were 28.0 min for 3β-hydroxy-5α-diketone and 33.6 min for 3α-hydroxy-5α-diketone. 6-Azi-3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnane-11,20-dione (15) was a white solid (10.0 mg, 34%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.94 (s, 1H), 2.72 (t, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H), 2.53 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.31–2.12 (m, 4H), 2.10 (s, 3H), 1.97 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1H), 1.87–1.62 (m, 5H), 1.55–1.46 (m, 1H), 1.38–1.29 (m, 4H), 1.28–1.17 (m, 2H), 0.70–0.58 (m, 5H), 0.54 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.4 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 208.6, 207.8, 64.9, 63.3, 62.0, 56.7, 55.4, 47.3, 39.2, 37.9, 34.9, 31.3, 30.3, 30.2, 29.7, 28.8, 28.0, 23.5, 23.3, 14.3, 11.8. HRMS: calculated for C21H31N2O3 [M+H]+: 359.2335; found: 359.2318.

21-[4-(3-(Trifluoromethyl)-3H-diazirin-3-yl)benzoxy]allopregnanolone (16).

A reaction mixture of 3α,21-dihydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one (3, 34 mg, 0.10 mmol), TFD-benzoic acid 24 (28 mg, 0.12 mmol), N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N’-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC-HCl) (27 mg, 0.14 mmol) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (18 mg, 0.15 mmol) in dichloromethane (4.0 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 18 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated sodium bicarbonate (10 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (20 mL×3). The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using hexane - ethyl acetate (4:1) to give compound 16 as a white solid (33 mg, 59%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 4.97 (d, J = 16.7 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (d, J = 16.7 Hz, 1H), 4.04 (s, 1H), 2.56 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (dd, J = 19.8, 10.7 Hz, 1H), 2.07 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 1.80–1.55 (m, 7H), 1.50–1.12 (m, 12H), 1.04–0.89 (m, 1H), 0.86–0.74 (m, 4H), 0.68 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 203.5, 165.0, 134.2, 130.7, 130.4, 126.5, 122.0 (q, JC-F = 273.2 Hz), 70.0, 66.6, 59.6, 57.1, 54.3, 45.2, 39.2, 39.0, 36.3, 36.0, 35.7, 32.3, 32.1, 29.1, 28.6, 28.6 (q, JC-F = 40.4 Hz), 24.6, 23.0, 20.9, 13.5, 11.3. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −64.90. HRMS: Calculated for C30H38F3N2O4 [M+H]+: 547.2784; Found: 547.2784.

21-[4-(3-(Trifluoromethyl)-3H-diazirin-3-yl)-3-iodo-benzoxy]allopregnanolone (26).

Compound 26 was prepared using the above procedure and 3-iodo-4-TFD-benzoic acid 25 (43 mg, 0.12 mmol) to give compound 26 as a white solid (34 mg, 51% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.98 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (d, J = 16.7 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 16.7 Hz, 1H), 4.09–3.99 (m, 1H), 2.55 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (dd, J = 20.0, 10.8 Hz, 1H), 2.07 (dd, J = 11.6, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.81–1.57 (m, 7H), 1.52–1.19 (m, 12H), 1.04–0.88 (m, 1H), 0.85– 0.79 (m, 1H), 0.78 (s, 3H), 0.67 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 203.2, 165.1, 139.0, 135.8, 133.9, 131.6, 126.2, 121.7 (q, JC-F = 273.2 Hz), 94.6, 70.1, 66.6, 59.7, 57.1, 54.3, 45.2, 39.2, 39.0, 36.3, 36.0, 35.6, 32.3, 32.1, 29.1, 28.5, 27.7 (q, JC-F = 41.1 Hz), 24.6, 23.0, 20.9, 13.6, 11.3. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −64.92. HRMS: calculated for C30H37F3IN2O4 [M+H]+: 673.1750; found: 673.1780.

Hydrodeiodination of compound 26.

A solution of compound 26 (2.0 mg, 0.0030 mmol) in MeOH (1.0 mL) was degassed by bubbling argon gas for 10 min., Pd/C (5 wt. %, 2.0 mg) was added, and the reaction mixture was degassed again by bubbling hydrogen for 10 min. The mixture was stirred at room temperature under atmospheric pressure hydrogen for 3 h. The slurry was filtered through Celite and concentrated under vacuum. The reaction mixture was dissolved in MeOH (1.0 mL), filtered through a submicron filter and chromatographed on a semi-prep HPLC column: Phenomenex Luna (2), 250 × 21.2 mm, 5 μm, C18 with Macherey-Nagel Nucleodur guard column, 16 × 10 mm, 5 μm, C18 using 10 mL/min flow rate. Gradient conditions: phase A, methanol-water 1:1, phase B, methanol; gradient: 1% B, 0–2 min, then linear gradient to 99% B at 44 min, followed by washing with 99% B for the next 20 min. Fraction collector: 1.5 mL each fraction, starting from 49 min. Detection: UV at 254 and 350 nm wavelength, the pure diazirine fractions were identified by the characteristic absorption at 350 nm. Under those conditions the retention times were 49.8 min for deiodinated compound 16 and 51.4 min for iodo-precursor 26. The yield of compound 16 was 63%. The identity of this product with that synthesized earlier was ascertained by 1H NMR and TLC.

Crystal Structure of Compound 22.

Colorless crystals were grown from methanol-water mixture. Data was collected at the Advanced Photon Source, LS-CAT, 21-ID-D at 100K on a crystal measuring 20 × 50 × 50 μm with a wavelength of 0.72927 Å. The unit cell was monoclinic, a = 6.959(2)Å, b = 32.659(8)Å, c = 8.135(2)Å, b = 90.338(10)°, V = 1849Å3, space group P21 (No. 4) with two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. A total of 128,725 intensities were collected to a maximum resolution of 0.83Å. The intensities were later scaled and averaged to a total of 9913 independent reflections, R(merge) = 0.0525. Structure solution using SHELXS. Refinement of all atoms, with anisotropic Gaussian displacement parameters for the non-hydrogen atoms. Hydrogen atoms were placed with geometric restraints. The final refinement yielded R2 = 0.2342, R1 = 0.0881 for 3972 intensities greater than 2s, and R1 = 0.0919 for all 3972 reflections with a GOF = 1.036. The absolute stereochemistry was not well determined; the Flack parameter was estimated by two methods: −0.3(5) by the traditional method, and −0.3(5) by the Parson’s method; the Hooft y-parameter was determined to be −0.5(6), G-parameter was determined to 2(1), and the probability of correct stereochemical assignment is 0.945.

Acknowledgements:

This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute for General Medicine to K.W.M. (GM 58448) and by the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. We thank Dr. Bernard Santarsiero for determination of x-ray structures of compound 22. Use of the LS-CAT Sector 21 was supported by the Michigan Economic Development Corporation and the Michigan Technology Tri-Corridor for the support of this research program (Grant 085P1000817).

ABBREVIATIONS USED

DMAP

4-dimethylaminopyridine

DMF

dimethylformamide

DMSO

methyl sulfoxide

EC5

concentration required for 5% of full effect

EC50

concentration required for half-maximal effect

GABA

γ-aminobutyric acid

ECD

extracellular domain

EDC

N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N’-ethylcarbodiimide

GABAAR

GABAA-type receptor

IC50

concentration required for 50% of full inhibitory effect

GLIC

Gloeobacter ligand-gated ion-channel

LoRR

loss of righting reflexes

nH

Hill coefficient

R-mTFD-MPAB

(R)-5-allyl-1-methyl-5-[m-trifluoromethyldiazyrynyl)phenyl]-barbituric acid

THDOC

tetrahydrocorticosterone

THF

tetrahydrofuran

TFD

trifluoromethyldiazirine

TMD

transmembrane domain

3α,5α-P

allopregnanolone

3α,5β-P

pregnanolone

PS

pregnenolone sulfate

SD

standard deviation

Footnotes

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lambert JJ; Belelli D; Hill-Venning C; Peters JA Neurosteroids and GABAA receptor function. Trends Pharmacol. Sci 1995, 16, 295–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lambert JJ; Belelli D; Peden DR; Vardy AW, Peters JA Neurosteroid modulation of GABAA receptors. Prog. Neurobiol 2003, 71, 67–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Belelli D; Lambert JJ Neurosteroids: endogenous regulators of the GABA(A) receptor. Nature Rev. Neurosci 2005, 6, 565–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hosie AM; Wilkins ME; da Silva HM; Smart TG Endogenous neurosteroids regulate GABAA receptors through two discrete transmembrane sites. Nature 2006, 444, 486–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Olsen RW; Sieghart W GABAA receptors: Subtypes provide diversity of function and pharmacology. Neuropharmacol. 2009, 56, 141–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cornet WT; Popescu DT Althesin (alphadione, CT 1341): a ‘new’ induction agent for anesthesia. Arch. Chir. Neerl 1977, 29, 135–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clarke RS Adverse effects of intravenously administered drugs used in anaesthetic practice. Drugs 1981, 22, 26–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chiu KW; Robson S; Devi JL; Woodward A; Whittem T The cardiopulmonary effects and quality of anesthesia after induction with alphaxalone in 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin in dogs and cats: a systematic review. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther 2016, 39, 525–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nohria V; Giller E Ganaxolone. Neurotherapeutics 2007, 4, 102–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Metcalfe S; Hulands-Nave A; Bell M; Kidd C; Pasloske K; O’Hagan B; Perkins N; Wilhelm T (2014) Multicentre, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of alphaxalone administered to bitches for induction of anaesthesia prior to caesarean section. Aust. Vet. J 2014, 92, 333–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martinez Botella G; Salituro FG; Harrison BL; Beresis RT; Bai Z; Blanco MJ; Belfort GM; Dai J; Loya CM; Ackley MA; Althaus AL; Grossman SJ; Hoffmann E; Doherty JJ; Robichaud AJ Neuroactive steroids. 2. 3α-Hydroxy-3β-methyl-21-(4-cyano-1H-pyrazol-1’-yl)-19-nor-5β-pregnan-20-one (SAGE-217): A clinical next generation neuroactive steroid positive allosteric modulator of the (γ-aminobutyric acid)A receptor. J. Med. Chem 2017, 60, 7810–7819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Akk G; Covey DF; Evers AS; Steinbach JH; Zorumski CF; Mennerick S Mechanisms of neurosteroid interactions with GABA(A) receptors. Pharmacol. Ther 2007, 116, 35–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Olsen RW Allosteric ligands and their binding sites define γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor subtypes, Adv. Pharmacol 2015, 73, 167–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Forman SA; Miller KW Mapping general anesthetic sites in heteromeric γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors reveals a potential for targeting receptor subtypes. Anesth. Analg 2016, 123, 1263–1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Laverty D; Thomas P; Field M; Andersen OJ; Gold MG; Giggin PC; Gielen M; Smart TG Crystal structures of a GABAA-receptor chimera reveal new endogeneous neurosteroid-binding sites. Nature Struct. Biol 2017, 24, 977–985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miller PS; Scott S; Masiulis S; DeColibus L; Pardon E; Steyart J; Aricescu AR Structural basis for GABAA receptor potentiation by neurosteroids. Nature Struct. Biol 2017, 24, 986–992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen ZW; Manion B; Townsend RR; Reichert DE; Covey DF; Steinbach JH; Sieghart W; Fuchs K; Evers AS Neurosteroid analog photolabeling of a site in the third transmembrane domain of the β3 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor. Mol. Pharmacol 2012, 82, 408–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chiara DC, Dostalova Z, Jayakar SS, Zhou X, Miller KW, and Cohen JB Mapping general anesthetic binding site(s) in human α1β3 γ-aminobutyric acid Type A receptors with [3H]TDBzl-etomidate, a photoreactive etomidate analogue. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 836–847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chiara DC, Jayakar SS, Zhou X, Zhang X, Savechenkov PY, Bruzik KS, Miller KW, and Cohen JB (2013) Specificity of intersubunit general anesthetic-binding sites in the transmembrane domain of the human α1β3γ2 γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor. J. Biol. Chem 2013, 288, 19343–19357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jayakar SS; Zhou X; Chiara DC; Dostalova Z; Savechenkov PY; Bruzik KS; Dailey WP Eckenhoff RG; Cohen JB Multiple propofol-binding sites in a γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAAR) identified using a photoreactive propofol analog. J. Biol. Chem 2014, 289, 27456–27468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cheng WWL; Chen ZW; Bracamontes JR; Budelier MM; Krishnan K; Shin DJ; Wang C; Jiang X; Covey DF; Akk G; Evers AS Mapping two neurosteroid-modulatory sites in the prototypic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel GLIC. J. Biol. Chem 2018, 293, 3013–2027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Savechenkov PY; Chiara DC; Desai R; Stern AT; Zhou X; Ziemba AM; Szabo AL; Zhang Y; Cohen JB; Forman SA; Miller KW; Bruzik KS Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of neurosteroid photoaffinity ligands. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2017, 136, 334–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Darbandi-Tonkabon R; Hastings WR; Zeng CM; Akk G; Manion BD; Bracamontes JR; Steinbach JH; Mennerick SJ; Covey DF; Evers AS Photoaffinity labeling with a neuroactive steroid analogue. 6-azi-pregnanolone labels voltage-dependent anion channel-1 in rat brain. J. Biol. Chem 2003, 278, 13196–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Komarapuri S; Krishnan K; Covey DF Synthesis of 19-trideuterated ent-testosterone and the GABAA receptor potentiators ent-androsterone and ent-etiocholanolone. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm 2008, 51, 430–434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Neves ASC; Meio MLS; Moreno MJSM; da Silva EJT; Salvador JAR; da Costa SP; Martins RMLM Improved syntheses of aromatase inhibitors and neuroactive steroids efficient oxidations and reductions at key positions for bioactivity. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 3255–3264. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Faucher N; Ambroise Y; Cintrat JC; Doris E; Pillon F; Rousseau B Highly chemoselective hydrogenolysis of iodoarenes, J. Org. Chem 2002, 67, 932–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bandyopadhyaya AK; Manon BD; Benz A; Taylor A; Rath NP; Evers AS; Zorumski CF; Mennerick S; Covey DF Neurosteroid analogues. 15. A comparative study of the anesthetic and GABAergic actions of alphaxalone, Δ16-alphaxalone and their corresponding 17-carbonitrile analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2010, 20, 6680–6684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Akk G; Li P; Bracamontes J; Reichert DE; Covey FF; Steinbach JH Mutations of the GABA-A receptor α1 subunit M1 domain reveal unexpected complexity by modulation by neuroactive steroids. Mol. Pharmacol 2008, 74, 614–617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stewart DS, Savechenkov PY, Dostalova Z, Chiara DC, Ge R, Raines DE, Cohen JB, Forman SA, Bruzik KS, Miller KW Allyl mTFD-mephobarbital: A potent enantioselective and photoreactive barbiturate general anesthetic. J. Med. Chem 2012, 55, 6554–6565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ziemba AM; Szabo A; Pierce DW; Haburcak M; Stern AT; Nourmahnad A; Halpin ES; Forman SA Alphaxalone binds in inner transmembrane β+-interfaces of α1β3γ2 γ-minobutyric acid type A receptors. Anesthesiology 2018, 128, 338–351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Seljeset S; Bright DP; Thomas P; Smart TG Probing GABAA receptors with inhibitory neurosteroids. Neuropharmacology, 2018, 136 (A), 22–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Krishnan K; Manion BD; Taylor A; Bracamontes J; Steinbach JH; Reichert DE; Evers AS; Zorumski CF; Mennerick S; Covey DF Neurosteroid analogues. Inverted binding orientations of androsterone enantiomers at the steroid potentiation site on γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. J. Med. Chem 2012, 55, 1334–1345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dostalova Z; Zhou X; Liu A; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Desai R; Forman SA; Miller KW Human α1β3γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors: High-level production and purification in a functional state. Protein Sci 2014, 23, 157–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dostalova Z, Liu AP, Zhou XJ, Farmer SL, Krenzel ES, Arevalo E, Desai R, Feinberg-Zadek PL, Davies PA, Yamodo IH, Forman SA, and Miller KW High-level expression and purification of Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channels in a tetracycline-inducible stable mammalian cell line: GABA(A) and serotonin receptors. Protein Science 2010, 19, 1728–1738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Forman SA; Zhou GL; Stewart DS; Photoactivated 3-azioctanol irreversibly Desensitizes muscle nicotinic receptors via interactions at aE262. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 11911–11918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES