Show me your secret(ed) weapons: a multifaceted approach reveals a wide arsenal of type III‐secreted effectors in the cucurbit pathogenic bacterium Acidovorax citrulli and novel effectors in the Acidovorax genus

Summary

The cucurbit pathogenic bacterium Acidovorax citrulli requires a functional type III secretion system (T3SS) for pathogenicity. In this bacterium, as with Xanthomonas and Ralstonia spp., an AraC‐type transcriptional regulator, HrpX, regulates expression of genes encoding T3SS components and type III‐secreted effectors (T3Es). The annotation of a sequenced A. citrulli strain revealed 11 T3E genes. Assuming that this could be an underestimation, we aimed to uncover the T3E arsenal of the A. citrulli model strain, M6. Thorough sequence analysis revealed 51 M6 genes whose products are similar to known T3Es. Furthermore, we combined machine learning and transcriptomics to identify novel T3Es. The machine‐learning approach ranked all A. citrulli M6 genes according to their propensity to encode T3Es. RNA‐Seq revealed differential gene expression between wild‐type M6 and a mutant defective in HrpX: 159 and 28 genes showed significantly reduced and increased expression in the mutant relative to wild‐type M6, respectively. Data combined from these approaches led to the identification of seven novel T3E candidates that were further validated using a T3SS‐dependent translocation assay. These T3E genes encode hypothetical proteins that seem to be restricted to plant pathogenic Acidovorax species. Transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana revealed that two of these T3Es localize to the cell nucleus and one interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum. This study places A. citrulli among the ‘richest’ bacterial pathogens in terms of T3E cargo. It also revealed novel T3Es that appear to be involved in the pathoadaptive evolution of plant pathogenic Acidovorax species.

Introduction

The genus Acidovorax contains a variety of species with different lifestyles. While some are well adapted to soil and water environments, others have developed intimate relationships with eukaryotic organisms, including as plant pathogens (Rosenberg et al., 2015). Among the latter, Acidovorax citrulli is one of the most important plant pathogenic species (Burdman and Walcott, 2018). This bacterium infects all aerial parts of cucurbit plants, causing bacterial fruit blotch (BFB) disease. The unavailability of effective tools for managing BFB and the disease’s high destructive potential exacerbate the threat BFB poses to cucurbit production (Burdman and Walcott, 2012; Zhao and Walcott, 2018) yet little is known about basic aspects of A. citrulli–plant interactions.

On the basis of genetic and biochemical features, A. citrulli strains are divided into two main groups: group I strains have been generally isolated from melon and other non‐watermelon cucurbits, whereas group II strains have been mainly isolated from watermelon (Burdman et al., 2005; Walcott et al., 2000, 2004). Acidovorax citrulli M6 is a group I strain that was isolated in 2002 from a BFB outbreak in melons (Burdman et al., 2005) and subsequently became a model group I strain for investigation of basic aspects of BFB. Its genome has been sequenced, first by Illumina MiSeq (Eckshtain‐Levi et al., 2016) and more recently by PacBio (Yang et al., 2019), which allowed its complete closure.

As with many Gram‐negative plant and animal pathogenic bacteria, A. citrulli relies on a functional type III secretion system (T3SS) to promote disease (Bahar and Burdman, 2010). T3SSs are employed by these pathogens to deliver protein effectors into target eukaryotic cells. Collectively, type III‐secreted effectors (T3Es) promote disease by modulating a variety of cellular functions for the benefit of the pathogen (Block et al., 2008; Büttner, 2016; Galan et al., 2014). In the case of plant pathogenic bacteria, T3Es promote virulence through alteration of the plant cell metabolism and/or suppression of host immune responses (Feng and Zhou, 2012; Macho and Zipfel, 2015). As part of their defence mechanism, plants recognize some effectors by corresponding disease resistance (R) proteins, mostly belonging to the nucleotide‐binding (NB)‐leucine‐rich repeat (LRR) type of immune receptors (NLRs) (Duxbury et al., 2016; Jones and Dangl, 2006). On effector recognition, R proteins elicit a battery of defence responses collectively referred to as effector‐triggered immunity (ETI). ETI is often accompanied by the hypersensitive response (HR), a rapid death of plant cells at the infection site that arrests pathogen spread in the plant tissue (Flor, 1971). Elucidating the arsenal of pathogen effectors and their contribution to virulence is therefore of critical importance for the understanding of basic aspects of pathogenicity and also for translational research in the crop protection field.

Due to the requirement of type III secretion (T3S) for pathogenicity in susceptible plants and HR elicitation in resistant plants, the genes encoding key T3SS regulators and structural components in plant pathogenic bacteria are named hrp genes (for HR and pathogenicity) or hrc genes, in the case of hrp genes that are conserved among different bacterial genera (Bogdanove et al., 1996). On the basis of gene content, operon organization and regulation, hrp clusters are divided into class I, which contains the hrp clusters of Pseudomonas syringae and plant pathogenic bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family, and class II, which contains the clusters of Xanthomonas species, Ralstonia solanacearum and plant pathogenic Acidovorax spp. (Bahar and Burdman, 2010; Bogdanove et al., 1996; Büttner and Bonas, 2002).

In Xanthomonas spp. and R. solanacearum, the expression of hrp‐, hrc‐ and hrp‐associated (hpa) genes, as well as some T3E genes, is regulated by HrpG and HrpX/HrpB (HrpX in Xanthomonas spp. and HrpB in R. solanacearum). HrpG belongs to the OmpR family of two‐component system response regulators and controls transcription of hrpX/hrpB (Büttner and Bonas, 2010; Genin and Denny, 2012; Wengelnik et al., 1996a). hrpX and hrpB encode AraC‐type transcriptional activators that directly mediate the expression of most hrp/hrc operons and many T3E genes via binding to DNA motifs that are present in their promoter regions. These DNA motifs are named plant‐inducible promoter (PIP) box (TTCGB‐N15‐TTCGB; B being any nucleotide except adenine) in Xanthomonas spp. (Wengelnik and Bonas, 1996) and hrp_II box (TTCG‐N16_TTCG) in R. solanacearum (Cunnac et al., 2004). Recently, Zhang et al. (2018) showed that the hrpG and hrpX/hrpB (thereafter hrpX) orthologous genes of the A. citrulli group II strain Aac5 are required for pathogenicity. They also showed that HrpG activates expression of hrpX, which in turn regulates the expression of a T3E gene belonging to the YopJ family.

Until recently, based on the annotation of the genome of the A. citrulli group II strain AAC00‐1, we were aware of 11 genes similar to known T3E genes from other bacteria (Eckshtain‐Levi et al., 2014). Considering the higher numbers of T3Es in several other plant pathogenic bacteria, we hypothesized that this could be an underestimation of the actual number of T3Es in A. citrulli. We also hypothesized that A. citrulli may carry novel T3Es that were not previously described in other bacteria. Guided by these hypotheses, we carried out a detailed sequence analysis of A. citrulli M6 open reading frames (ORFs) to identify genes with similarity to known T3E genes from other bacteria. We also combined machine‐learning (ML) and RNA‐Seq approaches to identify putative, novel A. citrulli T3Es. Furthermore, we validated a T3E translocation assay to assess T3S‐dependent translocation of candidate effectors. Combining these approaches allowed identification of seven new T3Es that appear to be unique to plant pathogenic Acidovorax species. Subcellular localization of three of these T3Es in Nicotiana benthamiana was also determined by Agrobacterium‐mediated transient expression.

Results

Identification of T3E genes of A. citrulli by genome annotation, machine learning and sequence analyses

Sequencing of the genome of the group II A. citrulli strain AAC00‐1 (GenBank accession CP000512.1) revealed 11 genes similar to T3E genes of other plant pathogenic bacteria (Eckshtain‐Levi et al., 2014). These genes were present in all tested group II strains. In contrast, all assessed group I strains, including M6, lacked the effector gene Aave_2708 (gene ID according to the AAC00‐1 annotation), encoding a Xanthomonas euvesicatoria XopJ homologue. Group I strains also had disrupted ORFs in genes Aave_3062 and Aave_2166, encoding homologues of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola AvrRxo1 and X. euvesicatoria AvrBsT, respectively (Eckshtain‐Levi et al., 2014).

To identify new putative T3Es of A. citrulli we applied an ML approach that had been successfully used for identification of new T3E genes of X. euvesicatoria (Teper et al., 2016) and Pantoea agglomerans (Nissan et al., 2018). Using this algorithm, all ORFs of a bacterial genome are scored according to their propensity to encode T3Es. The scoring is based on a large set of features that are described in the Experimental Procedures section. An initial ML run was applied on the ORFs of strain AAC00‐1. This strain, rather than M6, was used for learning and prediction because at the time this ML was conducted, the AAC00‐1 genome was fully assembled with better annotation. For training, the positive set included 12 AAC00‐1 genes that encoded T3E homologues: the 11 genes described by Eckshtain‐Levi et al. (2014) and one additional gene, Aave_2938, that is identical to Aave_2708. The negative set included genes that showed high sequence similarity to ORFs of nonpathogenic Escherichia coli.

The output of the ML run is shown it Table S1 (Supporting Information). For each ORF, we searched for the homologue in A. citrulli M6. Among the top predictions from AAC00‐1, many genes did not have homologues in M6. As expected, the 12 positive T3E genes of AAC00‐1 were ranked high in this list (among the 36 highest scoring predictions, with 11 being ranked among the top 15; Table S1). Results from this ML run served, together with RNA‐Seq data, for selection of candidate T3E (CT3E) genes for experimental validation (see below).

In parallel, we performed an extensive homology search, using BlastP, to identify additional putative T3E genes of A. citrulli M6. This analysis led to the identification of many additional genes with high similarity to T3E genes from other plant pathogenic bacteria. Table 1 summarizes the arsenal of putative T3E genes of A. citrulli M6, based on its genome annotation and sequence similarity analysis. Overall, we found 51 putative T3E genes. Most of these genes also received high scores in the ML search, ranking among the top 100 ORFs (Tables 1 and S1). With that said, ten genes encoding T3E homologues were ranked in very low positions in the ML run (Table 1).

Table 1.

List of putative T3E genes of Acidovorax citrulli M6 based on genome annotation and sequence similarity to known T3E genes from other plant pathogenic bacteria.

Locus_tag M6*	Annotation in M6*	Similarity†	ML1‡	ML2‡	Locus_tag AAC00‐1§	X¶	R¶	P¶
APS58_0030	HP	Type III effector HopBN1	171	8	Aave_2531	+	+	+
APS58_0167 **	avrBsT	Avirulence protein AvrBsT	3	15	Aave_2166	+	+	+
APS58_0178	HP	Type III effector HopF2	Not in ML1	131	−	+	(+)	+
APS58_0492	avrPphE	Avirulence protein AvrPphE family	14	32	Aave_3452	+	+	+
APS58_0502	yopJ	Type III effector YopP/ AvrRxv family	5	23	Aave_3462	+	+	(+)
APS58_0506	HP	Avirulence protein AvrPphE family	Not in ML1	12	−	+	+	+
APS58_0542	hopD2	Type III effector HopD2/HopAO1	28	26	Aave_3502	+	+	+
APS58_0658	HP	Type III effector XopN	103	13	Aave_3621	+	+	+
APS58_0664	HP	Type III effector XopQ	86	107	Aave_3626	+	+	+
APS58_0885	HP	Type III effector (R. solanacearum)	231	81	Aave_3847	(+)	+	−
APS58_1000	HP	Type III effector protein	814	98	Aave_3961	+	+	−
APS58_1023	xopD	Type III effector XopD	265	38	Aave_4359	+	(+)	(+)
APS58_1209	HP	Type III effector YopP/ AvrRxv family	Not in ML1	3	−	−	+	−
APS58_1255	HP	Type III effector XopAE	161	18	Aave_4254	+	−	−
APS58_1433	HP	Type III effector HopBD1	367	42	Aave_4427	+	−	+
APS58_1482	HP	Type III effector XopF1	241	28	Aave_4472	+	−	(+)
APS58_1627	HP	Type III effector protein	223	143	Aave_4606	−	+	−
APS58_1634	HP	Type III effector XopR	51	24	Aave_4612	+	−	−
APS58_1657	HP	LRR protein, type III effector PopP	73	110	Aave_4631	+	+	−
APS58_1658	HP	LRR protein, outer protein XopAC	43	52	Aave_4632	+	(+)	(+)
APS58_1676	HP	Type III effector protein	Not in ML1	25	−	+	+	(+)
APS58_1760	T3E protein	Type III effector protein	8	16	Aave_4728	+	+	+
APS58_1921	avrPph3	Cysteine protease avirulence protein YopT/AvrPphB	61	4	Aave_0085	+	+	+
APS58_1966	xopJ	Type III effector XopJ	Not in ML1	9	−	+	+	+
APS58_2045	avrRpt2	Cysteine protease avirulence protein AvrRpt2	156	14	Aave_0201	−	−	+
APS58_2122	xopAG	Type III effector HopG1/AvrGf1/XopAG	6	10	Aave_0277	+	+	+
APS58_2156	HP	Type III effector XopC2	951	100	Aave_0310	+	+	−
APS58_2228	HP	Type III effector SspH1 family	Not in ML1	45	−	(+)	(+)	−
APS58_2229	putative T3E, E3 ligase domain	Type III effector SspH1 family	Not in ML1	50	−	(+)	(+)	−
APS58_2287	HP	Type III effector XopK	235	11	Aave_0433	+	−	+
APS58_2313	LRR ribonuclease inhibitor	LRR type III effector protein (GALA5)	24	71	Aave_0458	−	+	−
APS58_2345	HP	Type III effector XopP	1161	17	Aave_0588	+	+	−
APS58_2589	HP	Type III effector YopP/ AvrRxv family	32	5	Aave_0889	+	+	(+)
APS58_2767	HP	Type III effector protein	Not in ML1	64	−	+	+	−
APS58_2799	HP	Putative AWR type III effector protein	33	34	Aave_1090	−	+	−
APS58_3109	HP	Avirulence protein AvrXv3	40	36	Aave_1373	+	+	+
APS58_3252	HP	Outer protein XopAC	56	118	Aave_1508	+	+	−
APS58_3261	HP	Type III effector HopBF1	37	60	Aave_1520	−	(+)	+
APS58_3289	hopW1‐1	Type III effector HopW1‐1/HopPmaA	15	19	Aave_1548	+	+	+
APS58_3303	HP	Type III effector XopE2	Not in ML1	1	−	+	+	+
APS58_3344	HP	Type III effector XopAI	27	93	Aave_1647	+	−	(+)
APS58_3751	mltB_2	Lytic murein transglycosylase, type III effector HopAJ2	36	285	Aave_3237	+	+	+
APS58_3909	HP	Type III effector XopV	193	21	Aave_3085	+	+	−
APS58_3930	HP	Type III effector AvrRxo1‐ORF2	655	31	Aave_3063	+	−	−
APS58_3931 **	–	Type III effector AvrRxo1	13	−	Aave_3062	+	−	−
APS58_3943	HP	Type III effector AvrPphF/HopF2	Not in ML1	37	−	−	+	+
APS58_4070	HP	Type III effector HopH1	7	6	Aave_2876	+	+	+
APS58_4101	HP	Type III effector, lipase domain	22	22	Aave_2844	+	+	−
APS58_4112	avrBs1	Avirulence protein AvrBs1/AvrA1	4	7	Aave_2173	+	−	+
APS58_4113	HP	Avirulence protein AvrBs1/AvrA1	16	2	Aave_2174	+	−	+
APS58_4317	HP	Type III effector HopD1	34	33	Aave_2802	+	+	−

^*Locus_tag and annotation according to GenBank accession CP029373.1 (Yang et al., 2019). Bold font indicates genes that were found to be significantly regulated by HrpX based on RNA‐Seq results (Table S2). HP, hypothetical protein.

^†Similarity based on BlastP analysis of the gene product.

^‡Ranking of the genes in ML runs 1 and 2. ML1 and ML2 were done with ORFs of A. citrulli AAC00‐1 (GenBank accession CP000512.1) and A. citrulli M6 (GenBank accession CP029373.1), respectively. In column ML1, ‘not in ML1’ means that this M6 gene was not detected in ML1 because it has no homologous gene in strain AAC00‐1.

^§Corresponding locus_tag in A. citrulli AAC00‐1. Underlined genes are T3E genes that were known prior to this study, based on the annotation of the A. citrulli group II strain AAC00‐1 (Eckshtain‐Levi et al., 2014), in addition to gene Aave_2708, which is not present in strain M6.

^¶Similarity to gene products of Xanthomonas spp. (X), Ralstonia spp. (R) and Pseudomonas syringae group (P). + indicates significant similarity to at least one gene product; (+) indicates significant similarity to hits with relatively low query coverage (below 60%); – indicates that no significant hits were detected.

^**These genes are probably non‐functional in strain M6 and in all group I strains assessed so far (Eckshtain‐Levi et al., 2014).

Most predicted T3E genes shared levels of similarity with T3E genes of Xanthomonas spp. and R. solanacearum (44 and 40 genes, respectively; Table 1). A smaller number of genes, 31, shared similarity with T3E genes of P. syringae strains. We also assessed the occurrence of these T3Es in other plant pathogenic Acidovorax species. Except for the HopBD1 homologue APS58_1433 that could be detected only in A. citrulli strains, the other predicted T3Es occur in other pathogenic Acidovorax species, with some of them being widely distributed (Table S2).

Interestingly, of the 51 putative T3E genes of A. citrulli M6, ten could not be detected in the group II strain AAC00‐1 (Table 1). Besides M6 and AAC00‐1, the NCBI database includes draft genomes of one additional group II strain, KAAC17055, and four group I strains, pslb65, tw6, DSM 17060 and ZJU1106. BlastN analyses revealed that these ten genes are also absent in strain KAAC17055, but are present in most of the group I strains. The only exceptions were APS58_0506, which was not detected in strains tw6 and DSM 17060, APS58_1209, which was not detected in tw6, and APS58_2767, which was not detected in DSM 17060. The inability to detect these T3E genes in the genomes of tw6 and DSM 17060 could reflect true absence in these strains but also could be due to the draft nature of these genomes. In any case, these results strongly suggest that the ten M6 T3E genes that are absent in the sequenced group II strains could be specific to group I strains of A. citrulli. This assumption should be verified on a larger collection of strains.

HrpX regulates expression of T3SS components and T3E genes in A. citrulli M6

In Xanthomonas spp. and R. solanacearum, the transcriptional regulator HrpX (HrpB in R. solanacearum) plays a key role in regulation of hrp and T3E genes. We hypothesized that this is also the case in A. citrulli M6. To assess this hypothesis, we first generated an A. citrulli M6 strain mutated in APS58_2298, the hrpX orthologous gene. This mutant lost the abilities to cause disease in melon (Fig. 1A) and induce HR in pepper leaves (Fig. 1B). A similar loss of pathogenicity was observed for a mutant defective in the hrpG homologue gene APS58_2299 (Fig. S1). Complementation of hrpX and hrpG mutations restored pathogenicity, although necrotic symptoms induced by the complemented strains were less severe than those induced by the wild‐type strain (Fig. S1).

Figure 1.

HrpX is required for pathogenicity and regulates expression of T3S and T3E genes in Acidovorax citrulli M6. (A) Disease lesions produced in a melon leaf inoculated with wild‐type M6, but not with mutant strains defective in hrpX or hrcV (encoding a core component of the T3SS) genes. The picture was taken at 3 days after inoculation (dai). (B) Cell death observed in a pepper leaf following inoculation with wild‐type M6, but not with hrpX and hrcV mutants. The picture was taken at 4 dai. In (A) and (B), leaves were syringe‐infiltrated with a bacterial suspension of 10⁸ cfu/mL. (C) Qualitative assessment of differential gene expression between wild‐type M6 and the M6 hrpX mutant after 72 h of growth in XVM2 minimal medium at 28 °C. gDNA, genomic DNA. cDNA, reverse‐trancriptase (RT)‐PCR of RNA extracts. Genes: hrcV (APS58_2306), hrcT (APS58_2309), hrcJ (APS58_2321) and hrcC (APS58_2331), encoding core T3SS components; APS58_3289, encoding a T3E similar to Pseudomonas syringae hopW1‐1; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (APS58_1610; control).

Furthermore, we used reverse transcription‐PCR (RT‐PCR) to compare expression of four genes encoding T3SS components and one T3E gene (APS58_3289, a P. syringae hopW1‐1 homologue) between the hrpX mutant and wild‐type M6 following growth in XVM2 medium. This medium was optimized for expression of T3S genes in X. euvesicatoria, as it simulates, to some extent, the plant apoplast environment (Wengelnik et al., 1996b). After 72 h of growth, expression of the tested genes was reduced in the hrpX mutant relative to wild‐type M6 (Fig. 1C).

Elucidation of the A. citrulli HrpX regulon by RNA‐Seq

Based on RT‐PCR results, we carried out RNA‐Seq to compare gene expression between wild‐type M6 and the hrpX mutant after 72 h of growth in XVM2 medium. This approach revealed 187 genes showing significant differential expression (significant fold‐change of ±2; P < 0.05) between the strains (Fig. 2A). Of these, 159 genes had significantly reduced expression in the hrpX mutant relative to wild‐type M6, while 28 genes showed the opposite pattern (Table S3A,B). RNA‐Seq results were validated by qPCR experiments with a set of selected genes (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Comparative transcriptomics analysis between Acidovorax citrulli M6 and the hrpX mutant. (A) Relative gene expression profile as assessed by RNA‐Seq of cells grown for 72 h at 28 °C in XVM2 medium. The A. citrulli M6 genome map is represented in the external circle. The internal red line shows differential gene expression between the strains. Genes within the grey zone: no significant differences. The −8 to 2 scale indicates relative expression of the mutant compared with the wild‐type. Genes with significantly reduced or increased expression in the mutant are in the inner and outer regions relative to the grey zone, respectively. Arrows indicate the Hrp‐T3SS cluster as well as genes with homology to known T3Es. (B) Relative expression of selected genes by qRT‐PCR following bacterial growth under identical conditions to the RNA‐Seq experiment (three biological replicates per strain). Asterisks indicate significant differences between wild‐type and hrpX mutant at α = 5% by the Mann–Whitney nonparametric test. All tested genes except APS58_2764 showed significantly reduced expression in the mutant relative to strain M6 in RNA‐Seq.

Most HrpX‐regulated genes could not be assigned to gene ontology (GO) categories using Blast2GO. Of the 159 genes with reduced expression in the mutant, only 47 were assigned to at least one biological process category. Blast2GO results are detailed in Table S3C,D, and Fig. 3 shows the number of assigned biological process categories of genes with reduced expression in the mutant. Among the most frequent categories, ten hits were found for transmembrane transport proteins, including several ABC transporters and permeases, and six matched with regulation of transcription. Nine hits belonged to protein secretion/protein secretion by the T3SS (Hrp/Hrc components). Notably, most T3S and T3E genes could not be assigned to any specific GO biological process. This was the case for 11 hrp/hrc/hpa genes and for 24 T3E genes (Table S3C). Overall, RNA‐Seq revealed 20 hrp/hrc/hpa genes and 27 genes encoding putative T3Es (including the seven new effectors identified in this study; see below) that had significantly reduced expression in the hrpX mutant relative to wild‐type M6 (Table S3B,C).

Figure 3.

Distribution of Acidovorax citrulli M6 HrpX‐regulated genes among categories of biological processes. Of the 159 genes that showed reduced expression in the hrpX mutant relative to wild‐type M6, only 47 could be assigned to at least one GO biological process category (blue columns). HrpX‐regulated genes encoding T3S structural and accessory proteins (red column) and putative T3Es (green column) were manually assigned to these categories.

The hrpX mutant also showed reduced expression of several genes encoding proteins that are putatively secreted by the type II secretion system (T2SS). We used SignalP, Pred‐Tat and Phobius tools to detect Tat or Sec type II secretion (T2S) signals in the ORFs of all genes that showed significantly lower expression in the hrpX mutant. While T2S signals were predicted in 39 genes by at least one of the tools (not shown), 14 genes encoded products with T2S signals by the three tools (Table S3E). Among these genes were APS58_0633 (xynB), encoding 1‐4‐β‐xylanase, APS58_2599 (pelA_2), encoding pectate lyase, and APS58_3722, encoding a family S1 extracellular serine protease. These three genes also contain PIP boxes in their promoter region (Table S3B).

Of the 28 genes showing increased expression in the hrpX mutant relative to wild‐type M6, only ten could be assigned to GO categories, most of which belonged to regulatory genes (Table S3D).

Identification of PIP boxes in HrpX‐regulated genes

We used fuzznuc to search for perfect PIP boxes in the A. citrulli M6 genome, using the consensus sequence TTCGB‐N15‐TTCGB. This screen revealed a total of 78 PIP boxes (Table S4), of which 41 correlated with significant regulation by HrpX (Tables 2 and S4). We used the PIP boxes of these 41 genes/operons to determine the consensus PIP box of A. citrulli (Fig. 4). Importantly, some of the PIP boxes were upstream of operons, thus probably regulating the expression of more than one gene. We detected 25 additional genes [marked as (+) in the PIP box column of Table S3B] that are likely in PIP box‐containing operons and had higher expression in wild‐type M6 relative to the hrpX mutant. It is also worth mentioning that 11 additional genes (some of which encode T3Es) carrying PIP boxes showed higher expression values in the wild‐type relative to the hrpX mutant in the RNA‐Seq experiment, but were slightly below the threshold of statistical significance (Tables S3A and S4).

Table 2.

Perfect PIP box sequences in genes that were shown to be regulated by HrpX in Acidovorax citrulli M6.

Gene_ID*	Annotation*	Strand	PIP box†	Start of PIP box	End of PIP box	Gene start codon	Distance (bp)‡
APS58_0030	(T3E HopBN1)	−	ttcgttttgttgattggaaattcgc	34554	34578	34553	1
APS58_0077	HP	−	ttcgcaattcgagaaatttgttcgg	93187	93211	93022	165
APS58_0185	HP	−	ttcgtgttgaaggcattcgtttcgg	216423	216447	216315	108
APS58_0197	puuD_1	−	ttcgtgcatcggctcttccattcgc	227069	227093	226515	554
APS58_0218	HP	−	ttcgcgtgtgcgtgaactctttcgc	254146	254170	254075	71
APS58_0500	HP	−	ttcgccccggcctgccggacttcgc	579574	579598	579502	72
APS58_0502	yopJ	−	ttcgcccggcaggcacccgtttcgc	583025	583049	582809	216
APS58_0543	HP	−	ttcgcatgcatgtgagcggattcgg	631454	631478	630839	615
APS58_0633	xynB	−	ttcgcttgctgcttcacgggttcgc	715951	715975	715863	88
APS58_0886	HP	−	ttcgcatcgccgtgcatggtttcgc	1015878	1015902	1015701	177
APS58_0986	HP	+	ttcgcattccgcgcgactgcttcgc	1113649	1113673	1113709	36
APS58_1000* §	HP	+	ttcgccaccgggcgcacggcttcgt	1129783	1129807	1129817	10
APS58_1026	HP	−	ttcgtgcacgcgcctgccggttcgc	1161953	1161977	1161806	147
APS58_1255	HP	+	ttcgcgcgccacggccccgcttcgc	1409795	1409819	1410119	300
APS58_1340	HP	+	ttcgcatgtccgcggagtcgttcgg	1511860	1511884	1512052	168
APS58_1448	HP	−	ttcgcgaggccacgcattgcttcgc	1632395	1632419	1632309	86
APS58_1483	HP	−	ttcgcattcccgtggccggcttcgg	1669735	1669759	1669644	91
APS58_1760	T3E protein	+	ttcgtgcctgcgggcacgtattcgc	1970321	1970345	1970408	63
APS58_1954	HP	+	ttcgcaagttctccagctttttcgg	2174442	2174466	2174654	188
APS58_1986	HP	−	ttcgcgccagcgcgcgggacttcgc	2212320	2212344	2212063	257
APS58_2304	hrcQ	−	ttcgccttacgcgatgagccttcgg	2546196	2546220	2546073	123
APS58_2307	hrcU	−	ttcgcgcggggcggaaccgcttcgc	2550224	2550248	2550146	78
APS58_2308	hrpB7	+	ttcgcattccggtgcgcggcttcgg	2550284	2550308	2550387	79
APS58_2312	hrpW	+	ttcgcatccgctgcgccgccttcgc	2553056	2553080	2553423	343
APS58_2314	HP	+	ttcgcgatgccgcatgcagcttcgc	2556756	2556780	2556924	144
APS58_2329	HP	−	ttcgcaagccatgaagcaacttcgt	2567741	2567765	2566734	7
APS58_2331	hrcC	−	ttcgcaagccgtcgcgcggcttcgc	2569879	2569903	2569803	76
APS58_2345	(T3E XopP)	+	ttcgcgcaaaggtgagcggcttcgc	2581209	2581233	2581585	352
APS58_2347	HP	+	ttcgcaccgccgtgcaggggttcgc	2585239	2585263	2585399	136
APS58_2599	pelA_2	−	ttcggctgcatggccgccgcttcgc	2862541	2862565	2862501	40
APS58_2771	HP	+	ttcggaccgctgcgccggcattcgc	3052001	3052025	3052432	407
APS58_2974	HP	−	ttcgttccaggcaggctgtcttcgc	3262651	3262675	3262590	61
APS58_3261	(T3E HopBF1)	+	ttcgcctggcgcaatgcgggttcgc	3574633	3574657	3574825	168
APS58_3289	hopW1‐1	−	ttcgccggggagggcagtttttcgc	3605458	3605482	3605197	261
APS58_3297	HP	−	ttcgcggggtggcactccgcttcgg	3611673	3611697	3611575	98
APS58_3344	(T3E XopAI)	−	ttcgcagccctccccggcacttcgc	3656278	3656302	3656147	131
APS58_3685	HP	−	ttcgcacgttggacatgcatttcgc	3989762	3989786	3989700	62
APS58_3722	HP	+	ttcgttttaagacgaagaaattcgc	4030992	4031016	4031209	193
APS58_4095	HP	+	ttcgcatccatggggccggcttcgc	4442672	4442696	4443213	517
APS58_4116	HP	−	ttcgcgcaggcgcatgcgcgttcgc	4476037	4476061	4475953	84
APS58_4317	(T3E HopD1)	−	ttcgcaccgtcggccatcgcttcgc	4692889	4692913	4692529	360

^*Locus_tag and annotation according to GenBank accession CP029373.1. HP, hypothetical protein. Genes showing descriptions between parentheses in the annotation column were annotated as HP but sequence analysis revealed similarity to known T3Es (see Table 1).

^†PIP box consensus: TTCGB‐N15‐TTCGB (where B is any nucleotide except adenine).

^‡Distance between the end of the PIP box and the first nucleotide of the start codon.

^§Gene APS58_1000*: this gene was not annotated in the new M6 annotation. It is located between genes APS58_0999 and APS58_1000 (positions 1129817–1130383), and its expression was confirmed by RNA‐Seq.

Figure 4.

Sequence logo of the Acidovorax citrulli M6 PIP box motif. The logo was generated with MEME‐ChiP based on multiple alignment of the 41 perfect PIP boxes that were found to be associated with HrpX‐regulated genes by RNA‐Seq (Table 2).

Evaluation of a translocation assay for validation of A. citrulli T3Es

A critical prerequisite for the discovery of new T3Es is the availability of a suitable translocation assay. We assessed the possibility of exploiting the avrBs2–Bs2 gene‐for‐gene interaction to test translocation of predicted Acidovorax T3Es into plant cells. The X. euvesicatoria AvrBs2 effector elicits an HR in pepper plants carrying the Bs2 resistance gene (Tai et al., 1999). A truncated form of this effector, carrying amino acids 62–574 (AvrBs2_62‐574), lacks the N‐terminal translocation signal, but retains the ability to elicit the HR when expressed in Bs2 pepper cells (Roden et al., 2004a). The avrBs2–Bs2 translocation assay is thus based on generation of plasmids carrying the candidate T3E (CT3E) genes fused upstream and in frame to AvrBs2_62‐574. The plasmid is then mobilized into a X. euvesicatoria 85‐10 hrpG*ΔavrBs2 strain that constitutively expresses hrpG and lacks avrBs2. This strain is used to inoculate leaves of the pepper line ECW20R that carries the Bs2 gene. If the AvrBs2_62‐574 domain is fused with a T3E gene, this elicits a Bs2‐dependent HR (Roden et al., 2004a; Teper et al., 2016).

Given the close similarity between the T3SSs of A. citrulli and Xanthomonas spp., we hypothesized that the X. euvesicatoria T3S apparatus would recognize and translocate A. citrulli T3Es, and therefore that the avrBs2–Bs2 reporter system would be suitable for validating A. citrulli CT3E genes. To test this hypothesis, we assessed translocation of the products of eight A. citrulli genes with similarity to known T3Es of other pathogenic bacteria. All tested fusions were translocated into pepper cells in a T3S‐dependent manner and induced a Bs2‐dependent HR in ECW20R pepper leaves. In contrast, HR was not detected when the fusions were tested in ECW30 leaves (lacking the Bs2 gene), and when a X. euvesicatoria hrpF mutant (impaired in T3S) was used as control (Fig. 5A). With that said, a weak necrosis was detected in ECW20R leaves infiltrated with the hrpF mutant carrying fusions of the AvrBs2_62‐574 domain with effector APS58_2122 (Fig. 5A). While we cannot exclude the possibility that this result was caused by generation of reactive oxygen species due to injury caused by the infiltration treatment (Huang et al., 2019; León et al., 2001), it is possible that this effector possesses additional, T3S‐independent export signals that allow its entering into the plant cell, as recently shown for the X. euvesicatoria effector AvrBs3 (Scheibner et al., 2017).

Figure 5.

Translocation assays of T3Es of Acidovorax citrulli M6. (A) Selected T3Es based on sequence similarity to T3Es from other pathogenic bacteria. (B) Candidate T3Es (CT3Es) selected from machine‐learning and RNA‐Seq. T3E/CT3E ORFs were cloned in plasmid pBBR1MCS‐2 upstream to the AvrBs2_62‐574 domain, which elicits HR in ECW20R pepper plants carrying the Bs2 gene, but not in ECW30R pepper plants that lack this gene. The plasmids were transformed into Xanthomonas euvesicatoria 85‐10‐hrpG*‐ΔavrBs2, and the resulting strains were used to inoculate pepper plants. All known T3Es (A) and seven among 11 tested CT3Es (B) elicited HR in ECW20R leaves but not in ECW30R leaves, similarly to the positive control XopS‐AvrBs2_62‐574. No HR was induced when leaves were inoculated with a X. euvesicatoria mutant impaired in T3S (ΔhrpF) expressing T3E/CT3E‐AvrBs2_62‐574 fusions. Also, no HR was induced following inoculation with X. euvesicatoria 85‐10‐hrpG*‐ΔavrBs2 without any plasmid (not shown) or with a plasmid expressing the AvrBs2_62‐574 domain alone (ΔN‐terminal). Numbers at the top correspond to the locus_tag in strain M6 (e.g. 0492 is gene APS58_0492). Gene APS58_1000* was not annotated in the new annotation of the M6 genome (GenBank accession CP029373.1) but its expression was confirmed by RNA‐Seq (see details in footnote 4 of Table 2).

Validation of seven novel T3Es of A. citrulli

Following validation of the avrBs2–Bs2 reporter assay for A. citrulli T3Es, we selected seven CT3Es based on ML and RNA‐Seq results. Four genes that were ranked relatively low in the ML were also included in these experiments (Tables 3 and S1). All seven CT3E genes, but not the low‐ranked ML genes, were translocated (Fig. 5B). The validated genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins, had predicted PIP boxes, were shown to be positively regulated by HrpX and ranked high in the ML run (Tables 3 and S1). Importantly, the gene APS58_1340, which contains a PIP box in its promoter region and has higher expression in wild‐type M6 than in the hrpX mutant (Table 3), was not translocated, indicating that these two parameters alone are not sufficient for accurate prediction of T3Es.

Table 3.

Candidate T3E genes of Acidovorax citrulli M6 that were tested in the avrBs2–Bs2 translocation assays.

Gene ID*	Product	ML†	PIP‡	RSEQ§	TRA¶
Genes that were ranked relatively high in ML1
APS58_0500	Hypothetical protein**	39/48	+	+	+
APS58_1000*	Hypothetical protein**	21/*	+	+	+
APS58_1448	Hypothetical protein**	17/104	+	+	+
APS58_2974	Hypothetical protein**	19/29	+	+	+
APS58_3297	Hypothetical protein**	20/61	+	+	+
APS58_4095	Hypothetical protein**	31/46	+	+	+
APS58_4116	Hypothetical protein**	11/43	+	+	+
Genes that were ranked relatively low in ML1
APS58_0705	GrxD, glutaredoxin‐4	91/2203	−	−	−
APS58_0863	Hypothetical protein	64/749	−	−	−
APS58_1340	Hypothetical protein	84/535	+	+	−
APS58_4399	Hypothetical protein	174/739	−	−	−

^*Gene IDs are according to the annotation of the A. citrulli M6 chromosome (GenBank accession CP029373.1).

^†ML: rankings in first/second machine‐learning runs. *, gene APS58_1000* was not included in the second ML run as it was not annotated (see footnote 4 of Table 2).

^‡PIP: presence (+) or absence (−) of perfect PIP box in the promoter region.

^§RSEQ: significantly reduced expression in the hrpX mutant relative to the wild‐type (+) or no significant differences between strains (−).

^¶TRA: translocated (+) or non‐translocated (−) in avrBs2–Bs2 translocation assays.

^**These genes were detected only in plant pathogenic Acidovorax species.

Interestingly, BLAST analyses of the seven new T3E genes revealed strong similarity only to hypothetical proteins of plant pathogenic Acidovorax species. The fact that no homologues for these genes were detected in nonpathogenic Acidovorax strains (despite the availability of more than 70 genomes of such species) or in other plant pathogenic bacterial species suggests a specific and unique role for their products in Acidovorax pathogenicity. These seven genes were detected also in AAC00‐1 (Table S2) and in all other group I and II genomes available in NCBI. Some of them were widely distributed among other plant pathogenic Acidovorax species (Table S2). Searches for conserved domains in these T3Es did not provide any functional insight.

Assessment of localization of three of the new T3Es

Prediction of subcellular localization of effectors APS58_0500, APS58_1448 and APS58_4116 using the Plant‐mPLoc server indicated that they could localize to the plant cell nucleus. Browsing these T3Es with the LogSigDB server revealed endoplasmic reticulum (ER) localization signals in the three effectors, and nuclear localization signals in APS58_0500 and APS58_4116.

We assessed localization of these effectors fused to the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in Nicotiana benthamiana following transient expression by agroinfiltration. Based on the aforementioned predictions, in the first experiments the leaves were co‐infiltrated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying the ER marker mRFP‐HDEL and were also stained with 4′,6‐diamidine‐2′‐phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) for nucleus localization. Representative images from these experiments are shown in Fig. 6. The results indicate that the three effectors could interact with the ER, but only APS58_0500 and APS58_1448 partially localized to the nucleus, including in clearly visible nuclear foci (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Transient expression of Acidovorax citrulli T3Es in Nicotiana benthamiana. T3E genes APS58_0500, APS58_4116 and APS58_1448 were cloned in pEarleyGate101, fused to the C‐terminus of YFP. The plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101, and the resulting strains were used for transient expression in N. benthamiana. Leaves were co‐inoculated with A. tumefaciens GV3101 carrying the mRFP‐HDEL endoplasmic reticulum marker and stained with DAPI for visualization of plant cell nuclei. Samples were visualized in a Leica SPE confocal microscope 48 h after inoculation. For each T3E, two sets of images are shown, with the lower images being magnifications of selected areas of the upper images. Bars at the right bottom of each picture, 20 µm.

In a second set of experiments, the YFP‐fused effectors were co‐infiltrated with free‐mCherry, localized mainly in the cytosol and in the nucleus, HDEL‐mCherry, localized to the ER, and the membrane‐bound protein SlDRP2A (L. Pizarro and M. Bar, unpublished results). Representative images from these experiments are shown in Figs S2 to S4 for APS58_0500, APS58_1448 and APS58_4116, respectively. The three effectors partially co‐localized with the membrane‐bound protein SIDRPA, as evidenced by the Pearson correlation coefficients (0.40 ± 0.024 for APS5_0500, 0.49 ± 0.040 for APS58_1448 and 0.53 ± 0.037 for APS58_4116). Since APS58_0500 appeared to have a stronger membrane localization, we used the classical plasma membrane microdomain protein Flot1 (Li et al., 2012) as an additional membrane control marker. Indeed, APS58_0500 had an expression pattern that was highly similar to that of Flot1 (Fig. S2). In agreement with the first set of experiments (Fig. 6), APS58_0500 (Fig. S2) and APS58_1448 (Fig. S3) partially localized to the nucleus. On the other hand, these experiments confirmed that only APS58_4116 partially interacted with the ER, mostly at the nuclear envelope (Figs 6 and S4; Pearson coefficient with HDEL‐mCherry 0.53 ± 0.037). None of the effectors has a significant cytosolic presence: the Pearson coefficient with mCherry was lower than 0.12 for APS_0500 and APS_4116, while for APS_1448 the coefficient was 0.53 ± 0.037 due to the strong nuclear presence of this effector, as indicated above. Overall, we conclude that the three effectors are associated with the plasma membrane, APS58_0500 and APS58_1448 partially localize to the nucleus, and APS_4116 partially interacts with the ER.

Generating an improved list of A. citrulli M6 CT3Es with a second ML run

Since ML can be improved after refinement of features specific to the studied pathogen, we carried out a second ML run. The main differences between the first and second ML runs were (i) the second run was done on the M6 genome, which by this time was fully assembled (Yang et al., 2019), (ii) we added the seven novel T3Es identified in this study and the four ORFs that were found not to be translocated to the positive and negative sets, respectively, (iii) in the positive set we included ORFs with high sequence similarity to known effectors from other bacteria, based on our homology search results (Table 1), and (iv) we used HrpX‐mediated regulation as an additional feature to train the classifier. The results of the second ML run are summarized in Table S5. Most known/validated T3Es ranked among the top 100 hits and among the top 40 hits, 34 were known/validated T3Es. Importantly, some genes with high propensity to encode T3Es (ranking among the top 60 in the second ML run) did not appear among the top 200 hits in the first ML list (Tables 1 and S1), thus supporting the higher reliability of the new list relative to the first prediction.

Among the top 100 hits of the second ML run, there were 37 genes that matched to hypothetical proteins, with no similarity evidence to suggest a T3E nature. Since this was the case of the seven novel T3Es validated in this study, it is possible that some of these genes encode yet undiscovered T3Es. In this regard, it is worth mentioning genes APS58_1954, APS58_1986, APS58_3685, APS58_0987 and APS58_1694 (ranking at positions 20, 27, 57, 62 and 83 in the second ML, respectively). While APS58_1694 shares similarity only with hypothetical proteins of plant pathogenic Acidovorax species, the others also share similarities to hypothetical proteins of other plant pathogenic genera (e.g. Xanthomonas, Ralstonia, Pseudomonas and/or Erwinia). These genes also had increased expression in wild‐type M6 relative to the hrpX mutant and have PIP boxes in their promoter region. These genes are therefore strong candidates for further experimental validations.

Discussion

Acidovorax citrulli requires a functional T3SS for pathogenicity (Bahar and Burdman, 2010). The main objective of this study was to significantly advance the current knowledge about the arsenal of T3Es of A. citrulli. Among well‐investigated plant pathogenic bacteria, the pools of T3Es vary from only few effectors in phytopathogenic bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family (Hogan et al., 2013; Nissinen et al., 2007) to approximately 20–40 in most strains of P. syringae and Xanthomonas spp. (Büttner and Bonas, 2010; Chang et al., 2005; Kvitko et al., 2009; O'Brien et al., 2011; Schechter et al., 2006; Teper et al., 2016; White et al., 2009) and an average of over 75 in R. solanacearum isolates (Deslandes and Genin, 2014; Peeters et al., 2013). Thus, we hypothesized that the repertoire of A. citrulli T3Es could be much larger than the 11 T3E genes reported in the group II strain AAC00‐1 (Eckshtain‐Levi et al., 2014).

As a first approach to uncover the A. citrulli T3E arsenal, we used a genome‐wide ML algorithm to determine the propensity of ORFs to encode T3Es. In parallel, we looked carefully at the annotation of the group I model strain of A. citrulli, M6, and carried out BlastP analyses of genes encoding hypothetical proteins or functions that could infer effector activity. These analyses revealed 51 putative T3E genes that shared different levels of similarity with known effector genes from Xanthomonas spp., R. solanacearum and/or P. syringae strains (Table 1). Homologues for most of these T3E genes and for those identified in the present study were also detected in other plant pathogenic Acidovorax species (Table S2).

To identify new putative T3Es of A. citrulli, we also used RNA‐Seq to identify HrpX‐regulated genes. Based on the knowledge accumulated with Xanthomonas spp. and R. solanacearum (Genin and Denny, 2012; Guo et al., 2011; Koebnik et al., 2006; Occhialini et al., 2005), we expected that most genes encoding T3SS components and some T3Es of A. citrulli would be under the direct regulation of HrpX. This assumption was strengthened in preliminary experiments comparing gene expression between wild‐type M6 and a hrpX mutant (Fig. 1C). As previously mentioned, Zhang et al. (2018) recently showed that HrpX controls the expression of one T3E gene in the group II strain, Aac5.

RNA‐Seq revealed 159 genes showing significantly reduced expression in the hrpX mutant, while 28 genes had significantly increased expression in the mutant (Table S3). These numbers are similar to those reported in gene expression studies carried out with Xanthomonas spp. HrpX and with R. solanacearum HrpB. For instance, microarray analyses of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (Xac) revealed that 181 genes were up‐regulated by HrpX, while 5–55 genes (depending on the time point) were down‐regulated by this transcriptional regulator (Guo et al., 2011). Occhialini et al. (2005) found 143 HrpB up‐regulated genes and 50 HrpB down‐regulated genes in R. solanacearum. In these, as well as in other studies, HrpX/HrpB was found to regulate the expression of most genes encoding T3S components and accessory proteins as well as several T3E genes (Büttner and Bonas, 2010; Genin and Denny, 2012; Valls et al., 2006). In line with this background, among the 159 HrpX up‐regulated genes found in our study, 20 encoded hrp/hrc/hpa genes and 27 encoded T3E genes. Interestingly, hrcC was a member of the A. citrulli HrpX regulon. hrcC expression in X. euvesicatoria is directly regulated by HrpG, in an HrpX‐independent manner (Wengelnik et al., 1996b). In contrast, in R. solanacearum, hrcC is regulated by HrpX (Brito et al., 1999; Valls et al., 2006), as we found in A. citrulli M6.

In Xanthomonas spp. and in R. solanacearum, the HrpX/HrpB regulons include genes that are not involved in T3S (Büttner and Bonas, 2010; Guo et al., 2011; Valls et al., 2006). A similar picture emerged from our study, where HrpX was shown to regulate genes involved in transmembrane transport, including several ABC transporters and permeases as well as transcriptional regulators. Among the HrpX up‐regulated genes we also detected several genes whose products are putatively secreted by the T2SS. These included genes encoding 1,4‐β‐xylanase, pectate lyase and a protein similar to S1 extracellular serine proteases (Table S3E). HrpX regulation of genes encoding type II‐secreted enzymes was also demonstrated in Xanthomonas spp. and in R. solanacearum (Furutani et al., 2004; Genin and Denny, 2012; Guo et al., 2011; Szczesny et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2008; Yamazaki et al., 2008).

More than 60 HrpX up‐regulated genes carried perfect PIP boxes in their promoter region or were part of operons carrying perfect PIP boxes (Tables 2, S3B and S4). Although some other genes may carry imperfect PIP boxes and may be directly regulated by HrpX, this result suggests that many of the HrpX up‐regulated genes are indirectly regulated by this transcriptional factor. This is a reasonable assumption, considering that among the genes that were up‐ and down‐regulated by HrpX there were several transcriptional regulators. For instance, genes encoding transcriptional factors belonging to the LysR (APS58_0949 and APS58_2039), IclR (APS58_1263), FmbD (APS58_1340) and TetR (APS58_3638) families were up‐regulated by HrpX. In contrast, two genes encoding DNA‐binding response regulators, homologous to PhoP (APS58_0821) and FixJ (APS58_1682), were HrpX down‐regulated (Table S2B).

After demonstrating the suitability of the avrBs2–Bs2 T3E translocation assay, we used the data obtained from ML and RNA‐Seq to select seven A. citrulli M6 CT3Es for experimental validation. We validated translocation of the seven candidates (Fig. 5), thus demonstrating the strength of combining these approaches for identifying new T3E genes. Importantly, the lack of translocation of the four ORFs that received relatively low scores in the ML strengthened the suitability of our combined computational/experimental approach.

An interesting trait of the seven new T3Es is that they share significant similarity only with hypothetical proteins of other plant pathogenic Acidovorax strains (Tables 3 and S2). These effectors may be involved in the pathoadaptive evolution of plant pathogenic Acidovorax species. Importantly, a second ML run, informed by the knowledge accumulated from this study, revealed additional genes that were ranked in relatively high positions and encoded hypothetical proteins that occur only in plant pathogenic Acidovorax or in other plant pathogenic bacteria (Table S5). These represent high‐priority CT3Es for future experimental validation assays. This result also emphasizes one benefit of the ML approach: its ability to integrate novel knowledge in the prediction algorithm. Importantly, since some of these new CT3E candidates share similarity with hypothetical proteins of other plant pathogenic bacterial species, this information could be exploited to identify new T3Es in other bacterial pathogens.

Another interesting characteristic of the new T3Es discovered in this study is their relatively small size. Based on the annotation of the M6 genome, the mean and median lengths of A. citrulli M6 T3Es are 387.7 and 345 amino acids, respectively. Except for APS_4116, which encodes a 347 amino acid protein, the predicted size of the six other new T3Es ranged from 113 amino acids (APS58_4095) to 233 amino acids (APS58_0500) (Fig. S5). In the public database (GenBank), there are several examples of small T3Es from plant pathogenic bacteria, including Xanthomonas AvrXv3 (most having 119 amino acids), P. syringae HopAF1 (112–291 amino acids), HopBF1 (125–207 amino acids), HopF2 (177–280 amino acids), HopH1 (201–218 amino acids) and AvrRpt2 (222–255 amino acids), and the R. solanacearum/Xanthomonas HopH1 homologues (155–218 amino acids).

In this study we assessed plant cell localization of three of the new T3Es validated in translocation assays, APS58_0500, APS58_1448 and APS58_4116. Utilization of subcellular localization prediction tools and confocal microscopy of N. benthamiana agroinfiltrated leaves strongly suggest that the three tested effectors interact with the plasma membrane (Figs S2–S4), with APS58_0500 remarkably mimicking the localization of the classical non‐clathrin mediated endocytic system protein, Flot1 (Li et al., 2012). While APS58_4116 interacted with the ER (Figs 6 and S2), effectors APS58_0500 and APS58_1448 partially localized to the nucleus (Figs 6, S3 and S4). Further characterization of the novel T3Es identified in this study may uncover new host targets of pathogen effectors and new mechanisms by which pathogenic bacteria manipulate their hosts.

In conclusion, we have combined sequence analysis, ML and RNA‐Seq approaches to uncover the arsenal of T3Es of the group I model strain of A. citrulli, M6, including discovery of new T3Es that appear to be unique to plant pathogenic Acidovorax spp. We also demonstrated the suitability of a translocation reporter system for validation of A. citrulli T3Es, which we expect will be very helpful to the Acidovorax research community. Until recently it was assumed that A. citrulli strains (and plant pathogenic Acidovorax strains in general) possess little over ten T3E genes. However, this study revealed that the A. citrulli pan‐genome encodes more than 50–60 T3Es, placing this pathogen among the ‘richest’ bacteria in terms of T3E cargo. Remarkably, a second ML run strongly suggests that A. citrulli may possess yet unrevealed T3E genes.

Experimental Procedures

Bacterial strains and plasmids

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S6. Unless stated otherwise, A. citrulli strains were grown at 28 °C in nutrient broth (NB; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) or nutrient agar (NA; NB containing 15 g/L agar). For RT‐PCR, qRT‐PCR and RNA‐Seq experiments, A. citrulli strains were grown in XVM2 medium (Wengelnik et al., 1996b). Xanthomonas euvesicatoria, A. tumefaciens and E. coli strains were cultured on Luria‐Bertani (LB) medium (Sambrook et al., 1989) at 28 °C for X. euvesicatoria and A. tumefaciens, and 37 °C for E. coli. When required, media were supplemented with the following antibiotics: ampicillin (Ap, 100 µg/mL for E. coli and 200 µg/mL for the others), rifampicin (Rif, 50 µg/mL), kanamycin (Km, 50 µg/mL) and gentamicin (Gm, 50 µg/mL for A. citrulli and 10 µg/mL for the others).

Molecular manipulations

Routine molecular manipulations and cloning procedures were carried out as described in Sambrook et al. (1989). T4 DNA ligase and restriction enzymes were purchased from Fermentas (Burlington, Canada). AccuPrep Plasmid Mini Extraction Kit and AccuPrep PCR Purification Kit were used for plasmid and PCR product extraction and purification, respectively (Bioneer Corporation, Daejeon, Republic of Korea). DNA was extracted with the GeneElute bacterial genomic DNA Kit (Sigma‐Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). PCR primers were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich and are listed in Table S7. PCRs were performed with the Readymix Red Taq PCR reactive mix (Sigma‐Aldrich) or with the Phusion high‐fidelity DNA polymerase (Fermentas, Waltham, MA, USA) using an Eppendorf (Hamburg, Germany) thermal cycler. Sequencing of PCR fragments and constructs was performed at Hy Laboratories (Rehovot, Israel). Escherichia coli strains were transformed using an Eppendorf 2510 electroporator according to manufacturer's instructions. Plasmid mobilizations to A. citrulli and X. euvesicatoria strains were done by biparental mating as described (Bahar et al., 2009). Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells were transformed by the heat shock method (Zhou et al., 2009).

Machine‐learning classifications

In order to predict T3Es, we applied ML classification algorithms, which are similar to the ones we have previously described (Burstein et al., 2009; Lifshitz et al., 2014; Nissan et al., 2018; Teper et al., 2016). The first ML run was used to search for T3Es in the AAC00‐1 genome (GenBank accession CP000512.1). The training data included 12 ORFs that were known as T3Es (see the Results section). The negative set included 2680 ORFs that had high similarity (E < 0.001) to ORFs in the nonpathogenic E. coli K12 genome (accession number NC_000913.3). The positive and negative ORFs are marked in Table S1. For this ML, 71 features were used, including homology (to known effectors or to bacteria without T3SS), composition [amino acid composition, guanine + cytosine (GC) content], location in the genome (e.g. distance from known T3Es) and the presence of a PIP box in the promoter region. The complete list of features is given in Table S8. Features were extracted using in‐house Python scripts. The outcome of the ML run is a score for each ORF, reflecting its likelihood to encode a T3E. We evaluated several classification algorithms: random forest (Breiman, 2001), naïve Bayes (Langley et al., 1992), support vector machine (SVM; Burges, 1998), K nearest neighbours (KNN), linear discriminate analysis (LDA), logistic regression (all three described in Hastie et al., 2001), and Voting, which aims to predict averaging over all other ML algorithms. For each run, feature selection was performed. The ML algorithms and feature selection were based on the Scikit‐learn module in Python (Pedregosa et al., 2011). The area under the curve (AUC) score over 10‐fold cross‐validation was used as a measure of the classifier performance. The first ML run was based on the random forest classifier, which gave the highest AUC (0.965). The second ML run was similar to the first, but it was run on the M6 genome (GenBank accession CP029373.1) and included additional information as described in the Results section. This run was based on Voting classifier, which included all the classifiers specified above as it gave the highest AUC among all the classifiers. The AUC for this second ML run was 0.999.

Generation of A. citrulli mutants and complemented strains

Acidovorax citrulli M6 mutants disrupted in hrpX (APS58_2298) and hrpG (APS58_2299) genes were generated by single insertional mutagenesis following single homologous recombination. Internal fragments of the hrpX (383 bp) and hrpG (438 bp) ORFs carrying nucleotide substitutions that encode early stop codons were PCR‐amplified and inserted into the BamHI/EcoRI site of the suicide plasmid pJP5603 (Penfold and Pemberton, 1992). The resulting constructs were transformed into E. coli S17‐1 λpir, verified by sequencing, and mobilized into A. citrulli M6 by biparental mating. Transconjugants were selected by Km selection. Disruption of the target genes by single homologous recombination and plasmid insertion was confirmed by PCR and sequencing of amplified fragments. To generate complemented strains for mutants disrupted in hrpX and hrpG genes, the full ORFs of these genes (1407 and 801 bp, respectively) were PCR‐amplified and cloned into the EcoRI/BamHI sites of pBBR1MCS‐5 (Kovach et al., 1995). The generated plasmids were transformed into E. coli S17‐1 λpir, verified by sequencing and transferred by biparental mating into the corresponding M6 mutant strains. Complemented strains were selected by Gm resistance and validated by PCR.

Infiltration of melon and pepper leaves with A. citrulli strains

Melon (Cucumis melo) cv. HA61428 (Hazera Genetics, Berurim, Israel) plants were grown in a greenhouse at c. 28 °C. Pepper (Capsicum annum) cv. ECW20R and ECW30 (Kearney and Staskawicz, 1990) plants were grown in a growth chamber (16 h/26 °C in the light, 8 h/18 °C in the dark, relative humidity set to 70%). The three youngest, fully expanded leaves of 3‐week‐old melon and 5‐week‐old pepper plants were syringe‐infiltrated in the abaxial side with bacterial suspensions of A. citrulli strains containing 10⁸ colony‐forming units (cfu)/mL in 10 mM MgCl₂. Phenotypes were recorded 3 and 4 days after inoculation (dai) for melon and pepper leaves, respectively. For a better visualization of HR symptoms in pepper leaves, the infiltrated leaves were bleached by soaking them in an acetic acid:glycerol:water solution (1:1:1 v/v/v) for 4 h. The leaves were then transferred to ethanol and boiled for 10 min. Experiments were repeated twice with similar results.

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and RT‐PCR

Acidovorax citrulli M6 and hrpX mutant were grown at 28 °C in 5 mL of XVM2 medium for 72 h with shaking (180 rpm). Total RNA was isolated using TRI reagent (Sigma‐Aldrich) and Direct‐zol RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Samples were treated with RNase‐free DNase using Turbo DNA‐free kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA concentration was quantified using a NanoDrop DS‐11 FX (Denovix, Wilmington, DE, USA) and RNA integrity was assayed on 1% agarose gels. RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Semiquantitative RT‐PCR analysis was performed using 1 μg of cDNA or gDNA (as positive control for amplification), 0.6 pmol of selected primer, the Phusion High‐Fidelity DNA Polymerase (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the following conditions: 98 °C for 15 min, followed by 35 cycles of 98 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 15 s. The A. citrulli GAPDH housekeeping gene (Shavit et al., 2016) was used as reference. The relative amount of amplified DNA was assayed on 2% agarose gels.

RNA‐Seq and quality analysis

Total RNA of wild‐type M6 and hrpX mutant strains was isolated as described above for RT‐PCR experiments. Three independent RNA extractions were obtained for each strain. Ribosomal RNA was depleted using the MICROB Express Bacterial mRNA Purification Kit (Ambion, Foster City, CA, USA). The integrity and quality of the ribosomal depleted RNA was checked by an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer chip‐based capillary electrophoresis machine (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). RNA sequencing was carried out at the Center for Genomic Technologies at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Jerusalem, Israel). The samples were used to generate whole transcriptome libraries using the NextSeq 500 high output kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with a NextSeq 2000 sequencing instrument (Illumina). The cDNA libraries were quantified with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen) and their quality was assessed with an Agilent 2200 TapeStation system (Agilent Technologies). One of the hrpX mutant libraries was removed from further analysis due to low quality. Raw reads (fastq files) were further inspected with FastQC v. 0.11.4 (Martin, 2011). They were trimmed for quality and adaptor removal using Trim Galore default settings: trimming mode single‐end; Trim Galore v. 0.4.3, Cutadapt v. 1.12, Quality Phred score cut‐off 20, quality encoding type selected ASCII + 33, adapter sequence AGATCGGAAGAGC (Illumina TruSeq, Sanger iPCR; auto‐detected), maximum trimming error rate 0.1, minimum required adapter overlap (stringency) 1 bp. An average of 0.6% of the reads were quality trimmed and 57% of the reads were treated for adaptor removal.

Mapping of RNA‐Seq reads on the A. citrulli M6 genome and differential expression analysis

Cleaned reads (c. 20 million per sample) were mapped against the latest version of the A. citrulli M6 genome (CP029373.1) using STAR v. 2.201 (Dobin et al., 2013). Mapping files were further processed for visualization by Samtools Utilities v. 0.1.19 (Li et al., 2009). The resulting Bam files were used to improve gene and operon predictions along the genome using cufflinks v. 2.2.1 followed by cuffmerge without a guiding reference file (Trapnell et al., 2010). Uniquely mapped reads per gene were counted twice [once using the original submitted annotation file (orig.gff) and then using the merged annotations by cufflinks‐cuffmerge (merged.gff)] using HTSeq‐count (Ander and Hubert, 2010). Differential expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2 R package (Ander and Hubert, 2010). Differentially expressed genes were defined as those genes with a fold‐change higher than 2 and a P‐value lower than 0.05.

Validation of RNA‐Seq results by quantitative real‐time PCR

RNA‐Seq data were verified by qRT‐PCR using specific primers of selected genes (Table S7). Bacterial growth, RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis were as described above for RT‐PCR and RNA‐Seq experiments. qRT‐PCRs were performed in a Light Cycler 480 II (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using 1 μg cDNA, 0.6 pmol of each primer and the HOT FIREPol EvaGreen qPCR Mix Plus (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia), and the following conditions: 95 °C for 15 min (1 cycle); 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 20 s (40 cycles); melting curve profile from 65 to 97 °C to verify the specificity of the reaction. The A. citrulli GAPDH gene was used as an internal control to normalize gene expression. The threshold cycles (C _t) were determined with the Light Cycler 480 II software (Roche) and the fold‐changes of three biological samples with three technical replicates per treatment were obtained by the ΔΔC _t method (Pfaffl, 2001). Significant differences in expression values were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney nonparametric test (α = 5%).

Additional bioinformatics tools

BlastP analyses to search T3E homologues were done at the NCBI server against the non‐redundant protein sequences (nr) database, selecting the organisms Acidovorax (taxid: 12916), Xanthomonas (taxid: 338), Ralstonia (taxid: 48736) or P. syringae group (taxid: 136849), with default parameters. GO assignments were done using Blast2GO software v. 5.2 (https://www.blast2go.com/). SignalP v. 4.1 (Petersen et al., 2011), Phobious (Käll et al., 2007) and Pred‐Tat (Bagos et al., 2010) were used for detection of N‐terminal type II secretion signal peptides. The program fuzznuc (EMBOSS package; http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/fuzznuc) was used to detect perfect PIP box sequences (TTCGB‐N15‐TTCGB; Koebnik et al., 2006) in the A. citrulli M6 genome. A logo of the PIP box motif of A. citrulli M6 was made with MEME‐ChiP (Machanick and Bailey, 2011) at the MEME Suite website (http://meme-suite.org/). Domain search of T3Es was carried out using the following databases/tools: Protein Data Bank (PDB) and UniProtKB/Swiss‐Prot (through NCBI Blast), PFAM (https://pfam.xfam.org/), Prosite (https://prosite.expasy.org/) and InterPro (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/search/sequence-search). LogSidDB (Negi et al., 2015) and Plant‐mPLoc (Chou and Shen, 2008) were used for detection of protein localization signals and for prediction of subcellular localization of T3Es, respectively.

Translocation assays

The ORFs without the stop codon of candidate genes were amplified using specific primers (Table S7) and cloned into the SalI/XbaI sites of pBBR1MCS‐2::avrBs2 _62‐574, upstream to and in frame with the avrBs2 _62‐574 HR domain of avrBs2 and a haemagglutinin (HA) tag (Teper et al., 2016), except for ORFs of genes APS58_0500 and APS58_1760, which were cloned into the XhoI/XbaI sites of the same vector. The resulting plasmids were mobilized into X. euvesicatoria strains 85‐10 hrpG*ΔavrBs2 (Roden et al., 2004a) and 85‐10 hrpG*ΔhrpF (Casper‐Lindley et al., 2002). Expression of recombinant T3E/CT3E‐AvrBs2_62‐574‐HA proteins was verified by western blot using the iBlot Gel Transfer Stacks Nitrocellulose kit (Invitrogen), and anti‐haemagglutinin (HA)‐tag and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) (Fig. S6). For translocation assays, X. euvesicatoria strains were grown overnight in LB broth with Km, centrifuged and resuspended in 10 mM MgCl₂ to a concentration of 10⁸ cfu/mL. These suspensions were used to infiltrate the three youngest, fully expanded leaves of 5‐week‐old ECW20R and ECW30R (Minsavage et al., 1990) pepper plants, carrying and lacking the Bs2 gene, respectively, using a needleless syringe. The plants were kept in a growth chamber at 25 °C, c. 50% relative humidity, 16 h day/8 h night. HR was monitored 3 dai. For visualization of cell death, the infiltrated leaves were treated as described above for pepper leaves infiltrated with A. citrulli strains. Each candidate gene was tested in three independent experiments with at least three plants, with similar results being obtained among replicates and experiments.

Agrobacterium‐mediated transient expression and confocal imaging

The ORFs of genes APS58_0500, APS58_1448 and APS58_4116 were amplified with specific primers (Table S7) and cloned into pEarlyGate101 binary vector (Earley et al., 2006), upstream of a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) encoding gene and an HA tag using the Gateway cloning system (ThermoFisher Scientific). The resulting plasmids were verified by sequencing and mobilized into A. tumefaciens GV3101 as indicated above. Transient expression experiments were performed following the protocol described by Roden et al. (2004b) with few modifications. Briefly, overnight cultures of A. tumefaciens GV3101 carrying the different plasmids were centrifuged, and pellets were resuspended in induction solution containing 10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM 2‐(N‐morpholino)‐ethanesulfonic acid (MES) and 200 mM acetosyringone (pH 5.6). The suspensions were incubated at 25 °C without shaking for 3 h. Bacterial cultures were then diluted to OD_600nm ~ 0.6 and infiltrated with a needleless syringe into leaves of 4‐week‐old N. benthamiana plants (Goodin et al., 2008) that were grown in a growth chamber (16 h/26 °C in the light, 8 h/18 °C in the dark; relative humidity set to 70%). Subcellular localization of tested T3Es coupled to YFP were investigated by co‐infiltration with A. tumefaciens GV3101 carrying monomeric red fluorescent protein fused in frame with the ER marker HDEL (mRFP‐HDEL; Runions et al., 2006; Schoberer et al., 2009), the membrane‐associated SlDRP2A (L. Pizarro and M. Bar, unpublished results) fused to monomeric cherry fluorescent protein, and by staining with 1 mg/mL DAPI, which was used to detect the nucleus of the plant cells (Kapuscinski and Skoczylas, 1977). As controls, plants were infiltrated with A. tumefaciens GV3101 carrying pEarlyGate104 (YFP‐encoding gene). Infiltrated plants were kept in the growth chamber at similar conditions as above, and 48 hours after infiltration (hai), functional fluorophores were visualized using an SPE (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) or an LSM 780 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) confocal microscope. Images were acquired using two tracks: track 1 for YFP detection, exciting at 514 nm and collecting emission from the emission range 530–560 nm, and track 2 for RFP and mCherry detection, exciting at 561 nm and collecting from the emission range 588–641 nm. Images of 8 bits and 1024 × 1024 pixels were acquired using a pixel dwell time of 1.27, pixel averaging of 4 and pinhole of 1 airy unit. Analysis of colocalization was conducted with Fiji‐ImageJ using the Coloc2 tool. For calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient, 15–18 images were analysed. Signal profiles were analysed using the Plot Profile tool (Schindelin et al., 2012).

Supporting information

Fig. S1 HrpX and HrpG are required for pathogenicity of Acidovorax citrulli M6. Lesions induced in a melon (cv. HA61428) leaf syringe‐infiltrated with 10⁸ cfu/mL suspensions of wild‐type M6, but not of M6 mutants defective in hrpX and hrpG genes. Partial restoration of the wild‐type phenotype was observed following transformation of the mutants with plasmids pBBR1MCS‐5::hrpX and pBBR1MCS‐5::hrpG (complementation plasmids), respectively. The picture was taken 3 days after infiltration.

Fig. S2 Subcellular localization of APS_0500. (A) Confocal microscopy images of Nicotiana benthamiana epidermal cells transiently expressing APS_0500‐YFP and different endomembrane compartment markers as indicated. Representative images show APS_0500‐YFP (green), the subcellular marker: HDEL‐RFP, Free‐mCherry or SlDRP2A (magenta) and the superimposed image of both channels (merge). Pearson correlation coefficient of the co‐localization between APS_0500‐YFP and the markers (N = 15–18) was determined using the Coloc2 function from ImageJ. Data represented as mean ± SEM. (B) Confocal microscopy images of N. benthamiana epidermal cells transiently expressing the plasma membrane protein Flot1‐GFP and Free‐mCherry. All the images were acquired 48 h after Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration using Zeiss LSM780 (40×/1,2 W Korr). Scale bar 20 µm.

Fig. S3 Subcellular localization of APS_1448. Confocal microscopy images of Nicotiana benthamiana epidermal cells transiently expressing APS_1448‐YFP and different endomembrane compartment markers as indicated. Representative images show APS_1448‐YFP (green), the subcellular markers HDEL‐RFP, Free‐mCherry or SlDRP2A (magenta) and the superimposed image of both channels (merge). Pearson correlation coefficient of the co‐localization between APS_1448‐YFP and the markers (N = 15–18) was determined using the Coloc2 function from ImageJ. Data represented as mean ± SEM. All the images were acquired 48 h after Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration using Zeiss LSM780 (40×/1,2 W Korr). Scale bar 20 µm.

Fig. S4 Subcellular localization of APS_4116. Confocal microscopy images of Nicotiana benthamiana epidermal cells transiently expressing APS_1448‐YFP and different endomembrane compartment markers as indicated. Representative images show APS_1448‐YFP (green), the subcellular markers HDEL‐RFP, Free‐mCherry or SlDRP2A (magenta) and the superimposed image of both channels (merge). Pearson correlation coefficient of the co‐localization between APS_1448‐YFP and the markers (N = 15–18) was determined using the Coloc2 function from ImageJ. Data represented as mean ± SEM. All the images were acquired 48 h after Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration using Zeiss LSM780 (40×/1,2 W Korr). Scale bar 20 µm.

Fig. S5 Distribution of Acidovorax citrulli M6 type III effectors (T3Es) according to their amino acid length. The data are from the annotation (GenBank accession CP029373.1) of the A. citrulli M6 ORFs.

Fig. S6 Expression of effector‐AvrBs2_62‐574::HA fusion proteins of T3Es that were tested in translocation assays. Total protein was extracted from overnight cultures of Xanthomonas euvesicatoria 85‐10‐hrpG*‐ΔavrBs2 expressing CT3E‐AvrBs2_62‐574::HA fusions in plasmid pBBR1MCS‐2::avrBs2 _62‐574. Proteins were analysed by western blot using HA‐tag antibody. XopS (X. euvesicatoria effector)‐AvrBs2_62‐574::HA was included as positive control. Asterisks indicate the size of the expected bands.

Table S1 Ranking and prediction scores of open reading frames of Acidovorax citrulli AAC00‐1 (GenBank accession CP000512.1) in the first machine‐learning run.

Table S2 Occurrence of Acidovorax citrulli M6 type III effectors in other plant pathogenic Acidovorax species.

Table S3 Differential gene expression as determined by RNA‐Seq between Acidovorax citrulli M6 and an M6 mutant strain defective in hrpX gene, after 72 h of growth in XVM2 minimal medium at 28 °C.

Table S4 Perfect plant‐inducible promoter boxes in the Acidovorax citrulli M6 genome.

Table S5 Ranking and prediction scores of open reading frames of Acidovorax citrulli M6 (GenBank accession CP029373.1) in the second machine‐learning run.

Table S6 Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

Table S7 DNA oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

Table S8 List and description of the features used for the first and second machine‐learning runs.

Data Availability Statement

The RNA‐Seq data that support the findings of this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA565338.