Skip to main content
EPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to EPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 7;633:1637–1646. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.136

Field-based method for evaluating the annual maximum specific conductivity tolerated by freshwater invertebrates

Susan M Cormier a,*, Lei Zheng b,1, Colleen M Flaherty c
PMCID: PMC6913529  NIHMSID: NIHMS1019282  PMID: 29428331

Abstract

Most water quality criteria are based on laboratory toxicity tests and usually include chronic and acute magnitudes. Field-based criteria are typically based on long-term or continuous exposures, so they are chronic. Biological responses of quantified, short-term aqueous exposures are seldom documented in the field. However, acute values may be derived by estimating an upper limit using temporal variance and chronic values. This method estimates an upper limit from the variance of pollutant measurements from stream locations that attain the chronic criterion. The formula for deriving a 90th centile of a standard normal distribution is used to identify the upper limit, a criterion maximum exposure concentration (CMEC). The calculated CMEC is interpreted as a maximum exposure that 95% of organisms may tolerate if the chronic exposure is not exceeded. The methods of deriving chronic and acute criteria are illustrated with specific conductivity in a mountainous area in the eastern United States. The biological relevance of the CMEC was assessed using the maximum annual exposure during the life cycle of the most salt-intolerant genera. The method using the chronic criterion and the variance of water chemistry data is practical, whereas frequently collecting and analyzing paired biological and chemical samples at numerous sites is impractical and may give misleading results due to lags in biological response. This method can be used anywhere with sufficient data to estimate the temporal variability and may be applicable for field-based criteria other than the specific conductivity criteria illustrated here.

Keywords: Upper tolerance, Water quality criteria, Benthic macroinvertebrates, Ionic mixture, Extirpation, Aquatic life

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1019282-f0001.jpg

1. Introduction

Protection and reestablishment of conditions that support aquatic life depend upon chemical and physical benchmarks, standards, and criteria to set loading limits and clean up goals (e.g. Stephan et al., 1985; Erickson and Stephan, 1988; CCME, 2007; van Vlaardingen and Verbruggen, 2007; European Commission, 2011; Warne et al., 2015). Most criteria are developed from laboratory-based toxicity tests. However, relevant exposure routes, effect endpoints, species, and life stages are not always captured by laboratory test methods. In some situations, laboratory toxicity tests have resulted in higher criterion concentrations than those that cause effects in the field (U.S. EPA, 2011b; Mebane et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017). For ionic mixtures, field-based methods for developing benchmarks appear to be more appropriate (Cormier and Suter, 2013; Cormier et al., 2013a).

Salinization of streams is recognized as a global problem (e.g. Environment Canada and Health Canada, 2001; Zielinski et al., 2001; Higgins and Wilde, 2005; Kaushal et al., 2005; Zalizniak et al., 2006; Gillis, 2011; Findlay and Kelly, 2011; Karatayev et al., 2012; Kefford et al., 2012; Cañedo-Argüelles et al., 2013; Johnson et al., 2013; Kaushal et al., 2013; Vander Laan et al., 2013; Dunlop et al., 2015; Johnson and Johnson, 2015; Zhao et al., 2016). To address this problem, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA, 2011b) published a field-based method for developing annual average continuous exposure benchmarks for specific conductivity (SC). However, the method did not provide for developing duration, frequency, and acute magnitude parameters usually associated with implementation of benchmarks or criteria.

This paper provides a method for developing an acute value to complement a chronic benchmark or criterion derived from field data. For simplicity, chronic and acute benchmarks and criteria are referred to by two acronyms, criterion continuous concentration (CCC) and criterion maximum exposure concentration (CMEC), respectively. A case study from the eastern United States is used to illustrate the approach by first deriving a CCC, then the CMEC for SC. Numerous researchers have documented the adverse effects of SC in this region (e.g. Pond et al., 2008; Fritz et al., 2010; Gerritsen et al., 2010; Palmer et al., 2010; Pond, 2010; Lindberg et al., 2011; Merriam et al., 2011; Timpano et al., 2011, 2015; U.S. EPA, 2011a; Bernhardt et al., 2012). Although various sources are present in the region, valleys filled with overburden from mountain-top-removal coal mining are a major source of increased SC (Cormier et al., 2013b).

2. Methods

2.1. Overview of approach

Acute criteria are infrequent, short duration exposures that may occur without causing effects above the upper limit of acceptability. In the method described in this paper, the threshold of the effect is the extirpation of 5% of invertebrate genera (the effect at the CCC). The acute exposure is defined by a low-frequency, short duration exposure level that occurs in streams that meet the CCC. That is, the CMEC is a brief exposure greater than the CCC that can occur without causing the same effect as an annual average exposure at the CCC. The field-based method for developing a CMEC, described here, uses a normal distribution to characterize the 90th centile of sites with an average annual SC less than or equal to a CCC. A similar approach was applied to human epidemiological data to develop water quality criteria for bacteria causing gastroenteritis (U.S. EPA, 2012).

Normal distributions are defined by a mean and standard deviation (SD). A reordering of the algebraic formula for the statistical Z-formula allows one to estimate a centile of a normal distribution. The calculation uses the annual mean of a distribution (by definition the CCC) and the SD of the SC measurements from the population of sites with multiple measurements. Therefore, the method requires a known and reliable CCC that is protective in a particular geographic area and data set of SC measurements sufficient to characterize the SD. To evaluate the resulting CMEC attained by this method, a paired chemical and biological data set was used that contained SC measures for the year preceding biological sampling. This data set was used to characterize the salt-intolerant genera that survived different annual maximum SC.

2.2. Geographic study area

Samples were collected from the Central Appalachians (Ecoregion 69) which extends from central Pennsylvania through West Virginia and Kentucky to northern Tennessee with small portions in Maryland and Virginia (Omernik, 1987; Woods et al., 1996; U.S. EPA, 2013) (Fig. 1). The climate is characterized by distinct warm and cold seasons with rainfall ranging between 960 and 1520 mm/yr. The high hills and low mountains are covered by a mixed hardwood forest with pasture and agriculture in the valleys. This high (366 to 1402 m), rugged plateau is underlain with sandstone, shale, conglomerate, limestone outcroppings, and coal. Underground and surface bituminous coal mines are common (Woods et al., 1996, 1999). Headwater streams in this ecoregion have some of the lowest SC in the United States (Griffith, 2014). However, high levels of SC are associated with coal mining (Cormier et al., 2013b).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Ecoregion 69 extends from central Pennsylvania to northern Tennessee. Sampling sites (stations; N=1420) used to derive the criterion continuous concentration are indicated as points in West Virginia.

2.3. Data sets

The data used in this study was obtained from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) in-house Watershed Assessment Branch database (WABbase). Chemical and biological samples are from 1996 to 2011 and 1997–2010, respectively. Data sets are available from the U.S. EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway (Cormier, 2017a,b).

Data were collected from 2299 perennial streams in Ecoregion 69. Sites included long-term monitoring stations, targeted sites within watersheds sampled on a rotating basin schedule, randomly selected sample sites (WVDEP, 2015), and sites on impaired stream segments (WVDEP, 2008a). Some sites were sampled monthly for water quality, but most sites were sampled once during an annual sampling period. The data set contains geographic location and both raw data and calculated metrics of water quality, habitat, watershed characteristics, and macroinvertebrate composition (WVDEP, 2008a). The WABbase data set includes assignment of reference status using a tiered approach. Analyses involving the use of these reference sites were drawn from the WABbase Level 1 reference status (WVDEP, 2008b). These are reference sites that “are thought to represent the characteristics of stream reaches that are minimally affected by human activities and are used to define attainable chemical, biological and habitat conditions for a region (WVDEP, 2013)” (sensu Stoddard et al., 2006).

Data filters that were applied prior to finalizing the data set for developing the CCC are described below. A total of 9806 records from Ecoregion 69 are included in the data set; of these, SC measurements were included in 8989 samples. Most of these are measurements of water quality without biological sampling. There are 1911 paired samples with SC measurements and biological samples. Of these, a total of 250 samples were removed from the data set to avoid potential acid mine drainage effects (pH ≤ 6, 237 stations) and different ionic mixtures (e.g. road deicers) with a high proportion of chloride ions, ([HCO3] + [SO42−]) ≤ [Cl] (13 samples). Occurrence at a minimum of one reference site and occurrence in 25 or more samples were requirements for inclusion of a genus in the CCC analysis.

2.4. Biological and chemical methods

Benthic macroinvertebrate samples were collected from a total area of 1 m2 from a 100 m reach at each site. Using a 0.5 m wide rectangular kick net (595 μm mesh), four 0.25m2 riffle areas were sampled. In narrow or shallow water, nine areas were sampled with a 0.33 m wide D-frame dipnet of the same mesh size. Samples were combined and preserved in 95% denatured ethanol. A random subsample of 200 individuals (±20%) was identified in the laboratory. All contracted analyses for chemistry and macroinvertebrate identification followed WVDEP’s internal quality control and quality-assurance protocols (WVDEP, 2006, 2008b). The data set had been well constructed by the WVDEP with excellent quality assurance based on our inspection of the database and supporting documentation.

3. Calculations

3.1. Calculating genus extirpation concentrations (XC95) and criterion continuous concentration

The example CCC was calculated in a two-step process following the field-based method using an extirpation concentration distribution (XCD) (U.S. EPA, 2011b; Cormier and Suter, 2013; U.S. EPA, 2016). First the extirpation concentration values at the 95th centile (XC95) values were calculated. The XC95 for each genus with >25 occurrences was calculated as the 95th centile of a weighted cumulative frequency distribution (CFD) of SC levels at sites where a genus was collected. Then, a frequency distribution of XC95 values was constructed, and the 5th centile was identified from the XCD by a log linear 2-point interpolation. In this study, the CCC is the 5th centile rounded to two significant figures.

3.2. Calculating the CMEC-field-based method

The field-based CMEC method relies upon the assumption that the acute value is a high exposure level to which a community may be briefly exposed while its annual average SC meets the CCC. That high level is approximated by the 90th centile of a normal distribution with the mean equal to the CCC. The z-score is obtained from the area under the normal probability curve for a selected probability, in this method, 0.90. That is, there is a high probability that at sites meeting the CCC, a SC sample will be less than the 90th centile which is identified as the CMEC. This does not mean that sites with an annual maximum < CMEC will have a high probability of achieving the CCC. Rather, the CMEC is an exposure higher than the annual average that could occur and a site might achieve the CCC. Therefore, it is essential that the CMEC is used in concert with the CCC. For a higher level of protection, U.S. EPA (2012) recommended using centiles between 0.75 and 0.90, an option that could also be applied to this method.

A normal distribution is statistically characterized by the mean and SD. In the example, the mean is the CCC and the SD is from the population of SC measurements with an annual geometric mean at the CCC. A minimum of six water chemistry samples over the course of the year prior to biological sampling were used to calculate an annual mean exposure during the univoltine life cycle of spring emergent genera. The sample set of stations (n=564) were sampled at least six times on a rotating yearly basis (in Ecoregion 69 from July to June). At least one sample occurred during the low SC season (March–June), and one sample in the high SC season (July–October). As with the derivation of the CCC, the data set includes a range of exposures that causes adverse effects to the most salt-intolerant taxa.

The calculation is performed as follows (Fig. 2). First, the CCC for SC is derived from paired biological and chemical stream data (Section 3.1). Next, using a data set from sites with multiple SC measurements, the SDs of sites are calculated to identify a subset of sites with a relatively stable SD. A LOcally WEighted Scatterplot Smoother (LOWESS, span =0.75) is used to estimate the trend line. This is necessary because streams with very low or very high SC may have lower variances of SC. If the LOWESS indicates that the site SDs are stable regardless of the annual mean log SC for sites, then the SD for all observations from sites with multiple measurements is calculated. If the LOWESS indicates that the SD is stable only within a SC range, only sites with an annual geometric mean of log SC within a defined range near the CCC is used to calculate the SD. The total or interval SD value is used to represent the typical variability around the CCC. The CMEC is calculated at the 90th centile from log values of SC in the region using Eq. (1).

90thcentile of log-normal distribution of SC=10(X+ZαS) Eq. 1

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Main steps in the derivation of a criterion maximum exposure concentration (CMEC) based on field water chemistry data. Rectangular boxes on left are products and pentagonal boxes on right are operations performed to generate those products. A Locally WEighted Scatterplot Smoother (LOWESS) estimates a line for a scatter plot by iteratively calculating many nonparametric regression models using local approximations from neighboring points. Specific conductivity (SC); criterion continuous concentration (CCC); standard deviation (SD).

Modified from U.S. EPA (2016).

In Eq. (1), X is the log 10 annual geometric mean SC limit for all stations (X; i.e. the CCC), zα is the critical value for the 90th centile area under a normal distribution (α, 0.10), and s is the total SD. The CMEC is calculated based on Eq. (1) by substituting the CCC for X to calculate the 90th centile. The 90th centile is rounded to 2-significant digits which yields the CMEC. The statistical package R, Version 2.12.1 (December 2010), was used for all statistical analyses (R Development Core Team, 2011). The calculated value is interpreted as a maximum exposure that 5% of organisms may tolerate if the chronic exposure is not exceeded.

3.3. Evaluation of the chemical CMEC method

For the paired biological and chemical analysis, an effect endpoint was selected that was directly relevant to the method for developing the chronic criterion: the occurrence of the genera extirpated below the chronic criterion. The biological relevance of the CMEC was evaluated by observing salt-intolerant genera after exposure in streams that did or did not exceed the calculated CMEC. A data subset was constructed from the Ecoregion 69 example CCC-data set. Of the 564 sites sampled in the data set, only 111 sites had biological measurements following a year with sufficient chemical measurements. Reference sites and impaired sites represented the variability of within site annual variability.

The relationship among SC, temperature, and the presence of the 7 most salt-intolerant genera, 5% of the XCD, were inspected for each of the 111 sites meeting the requirements for inclusion in the data set. Salt-intolerant taxa are those taxa with an XC95 ≤310 μS/cm (the example CCC).

3.4. Characterization of data sets

The “CCC-data set” has 1661 samples belonging to 1420 sites (stations; depicted in Fig. 1). Of these 1661 samples, 186 (11.2%) were sampled more than once between 1996 and 2010. Summary statistics for the CCC-data set is shown in Table 1. SC ranged from 15 to 3794 μS/cm which enabled us to assess a range of SC effect levels. In the WABbase data set in Ecoregion 69, a total of 219 macroinvertebrate taxa were identified to genus. Of these, 193 genera occurred at least once at one of 64 identified reference sites in the data set where invertebrate samples were collected. A total of 142 genera occurred at 25 or more sampling locations.

Table 1.

Summary statistics of the measured water-quality parameters used to derive the specific conductivity criterion continuous concentration in Ecoregion 69.

Parameter Units Min 25th 50th 75th Max Geomean N
SC μS/cm 15.4 94 229 540 3794 225 1661
Total Hardness mg/L 2.18 28.03 64.31 132.7 1492 64.43 834
Total Alkalinity mg/L 2 14 41 90 560 37 1144
SO42− mg/L 1 12 32 126 2097 39 1146
Cl mg/L 0.5 2 3 8 650 4 930
SO42−+HCO3 mg/L 8.66 36.3 99.4 252 2256 99.3 1142
Ca, total mg/L 0.67 6.9 16.9 33.5 430 15.8 842
Mg, total mg/L 0.5 2.4 5.0 12 204 5.6 832
Na, total mg/L 0.5 1.8 3.5 13 423 5.2 166
K, total mg/L 0.5 0.7 1.2 2.4 16 1.4 164
TSS mg/L 1 3 3 5 80 4 1151
Fe, total mg/L 0.02 0.09 0.18 0.38 4.9 0.19 1170
Fe, dissolved mg/L 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.07 1.1 0.04 995
Al, total mg/L 0.01 0.06 0.1 0.19 3.3 0.11 1142
Al, dissolved mg/L 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.9 0.04 1007
Mn, total mg/L 0.003 0.02 0.03 0.06 4.4 0.03 1142
Se, total mg/L 0 0.001 0.001 0.003 1.3 0.002 665
DO mg/L 2.06 8.47 9.27 10.2 17.1 9.41 1644
Total Phosphorus mg/L 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 1.3 0.02 897
NOx mg/L 0.01 0.14 0.28 0.45 11 0.26 910
Fecal Coliform Counts/100 mL 0.5 15 65 300 250000 71 1405
pH SU 6.01 7.00 7.54 7.97 10.48 7.48 1661
Catchment Area km2 0.34 4.36 17.6 65.2 17986 19.3 1408
Temperature °C −0.28 14.2 17.9 20.7 30.2 17.5 1661
RBP 10Sc RBP score 53 126 142 156 195 140 1641
RBP 7Sc RBP score 30 84 98 110 137 97 1647
Embeddedness RBP score 1 11 13 16 20 13 1649
Percentage Fines (sand+silt) - 0 10 12 20 100 15 1620

The data set has 1661 samples from 1420 stations. All means are geometric means except pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), Temperature, and Habitat Scores. RBP = rapid bioassessment protocol (Barbour et al., 1999); RBP 10Sc has 10 parameters, best possible habitat score is 200. RBP 7Sc is similar to RBP 10Sc but does not include 3 flow-related parameters, best possible habitat score is 140; NOx = total nitrates and nitrites; SC = specific conductivity; SO42− = sulfate; HCO3 = bicarbonate; Ca = calcium; Mg = magnesium; Na = sodium; K = potassium; TSS = total suspended solids; Fe = iron; Al = aluminum; Mn = manganese; Se = selenium.

3.5. Ionic composition

The ionic composition of the samples in the Ecoregion 69 data set was assessed to ensure a relatively similar proportion of ions at sites in the data set (Fig. 3). After low pH samples were removed, 56% of samples (938 in total) included measures of calcium, magnesium, sulfate, bicarbonate, and chloride, all but 13 sites (>98%) were dominated by bicarbonate and sulfate anions, ([HCO3] + [SO42−]) ≥ (Cl) in mg/L. These 13 chloride-dominated sites were excluded from the derivation analysis but these sites are shown in Fig. 3 which depicts the ion ratios in the parent data set. Because >98% of samples with measures of individual ionic measurements were dominated by bicarbonate and sulfate anions, sites with no ionic measurements were retained in the data set with the assumption that <2% of samples in the Ecoregion 69 example CCC-data set would be chloride-dominated.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Scatter plot of relationship between (Cl) and ([HCO3] + [SO42−]) in mg/L in streams in Ecoregion 69 data set from 1997 to 2010 where ionic measurements were available. The diagonal 1:1 line demarcates sites dominated by ([HCO3] + [SO42−]) from those dominated by (Cl−) mixtures, that is, on a mass basis in mg/L, the diagonal 1:1 line plots where the ([HCO3] + [SO42−]) = (Cl). Sites (1.4%, n = 938) above the diagonal line were excluded from the data set shown in Table 1. Samples depicted here include all sites including low pH.

From U.S. EPA (2016).

4. Results

4.1. Extirpation concentration (XC95) and hazardous concentration (XCD05) values

The Ecoregion 69 CCC-data set (Table 1) was used to develop XC95 values from weighted CFDs. The histogram depicted in Fig. 4 shows that the SC stations <30 μS/cm and >1500 μS/cm were less frequently sampled. Because the number of samples along the SC gradient was uneven, the occurrences of genera were weighted prior to the estimation of XC95 values (Cormier and Suter, 2013).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Histogram of the frequencies of observed specific conductivity values in samples from Ecoregion 69 sampled between 1997 and 2010 (Table 1). Bins are each 0.017 (1/60) of the range of log10 specific conductivity units wide.

From U.S. EPA (2016).

The XC95 values that were used in the XCDs are listed in the order of least to most salt-tolerant in Appendix A. Generalized additive model plots were used to designate approximate (~) and greater than (N) designations for those XC95 values depicted in Appendix B (U.S. EPA, 2011b; Cormier and Suter, 2013). The weighted CFDs used to derive the XC95 values are shown in Appendix C. The hazardous concentration for the 5th centile (XCD05), the 5th centile of the XCD, for Ecoregion 69was calculated at 305.4 μS/cm (Fig. 5); the two-tailed 95% confidence bounds were 233–329 μS/cm. Those bounds, derived by bootstrap resampling (Cormier and Suter, 2013), indicate that different data sets could yield XCD05 values within that interval. Rounding to two significant figures, the example CCC for Ecoregion 69 is 310 μS/cm.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Genus extirpation concentration distribution (XCD) for Ecoregion 69. Each point is an extirpation concentration (XC95) value for a genus. There are 142 genera. The hazardous concentration (XCD05) is 305 μS/cm (95% confidence interval is 233–329 μS/cm) and is the specific conductivity at the intersection of the XCD with the horizontal line at the 5th centile. Open circles are XC95 values.

From U.S. EPA (2016).

4.2. Criterion maximum exposure concentration

The CMEC was derived from the CMEC data set. In this example, the CMEC data set was composed of 5811 samples in a July to June rotating year representing 564 rotation years and 536 unique stations with at least 1 sample from July to October (J–O), 1 sample from March to June (M–J), and at least 6 samples within a rotation year. Note that inclusion of samples is not contingent on biological data. Reference and nonreference sites were included to ensure a range of SC (Appendix D). Sites were more heavily sampled in April through September; with both cool rainy seasons and warm dry seasons represented. The variability of within station SC was found to differ for streams with different mean SC (Fig. 6). A line was fitted to the data shown in Fig. 6 using a LOWESS. The average variability (SD for a station) in the middle of the SC gradient is slightly higher than both the lower and higher ends of the gradient. The stations with annual mean SC values between the 25th and 75th centile (which is approximately between 120 and 520 μS/cm) have relatively constant variances, and therefore, were used to estimate the SD components of the example CCC (310 μS/cm) used in Eq. (2). There are 2855 samples from 278 stations in the selected data sets for Ecoregion 69 with streams having mean SC values between 120 and 520 μS/cm. The log 10 geometric mean SC and SD of this data set were determined and the CMEC was calculated using Eq. (1) such that 90th centile of SC at any station within the region is predicted to fall below the CMEC if the CCC is not exceeded. The example CMEC calculation is shown in Eq. (2).

Example calculation of CMEC:10log10(310μS/cm)+1.28*0.243=633.5μS/cm Eq. 2

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Illustration of within site variability (standard deviation [SD] for each station) along the specific conductivity gradient (station geometric mean) in Ecoregion 69. The x-axis is the annual geometric mean specific conductivity (SC). Each dot represents a station. The Locally Weighted scatterplot smoothed (span = 0.75) fitted line shows a relatively constant SD between two vertical dashed lines bounding the logarithm mean station SC of 120 and 520 μS/cm. The mean SD was calculated from the total observations at these sample stations.

From U.S. EPA (2016).

This result was rounded to two significant figures, yielding an example CMEC of 630 μS/cm for Ecoregion 69.

4.3. Evaluation of CMEC with biological and chemical data

The biological relevance of the example CMEC was evaluated using data from Ecoregion 69 sites that had multiple SC measurements in the year prior to a biological sample. The maximum measured SC was identified during the year preceding the biological sample. The maximum SC of streams in Ecoregion 69 usually occurred in August or September. Salt-intolerant genera tend to be more commonly observed when they are larger and nearing emergence as winged adults usually in April through June. For example, Morris Creek had 2 salt-intolerant genera collected in April and a maximum SC of 450 μS/cm (Fig. 7) and an annual average well below 310 μS/cm.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Specific conductivity (SC) in multiple observations of a station in Morris Creek, WV. Julian day, 0=January 1, is on the x-axis. SC is on the y-axis with water chemistry samples as circles; the filled circle is the date of biological sampling. The horizontal dashed line is the calculated criterion continuous concentration of 310 μS/cm. SC minimum (58), maximum (450), and on date of biological sampling (75 μS/cm). Two of the 7 most salt-intolerant genera (extirpation concentration values at the 95th centile [XC95] < 310 μS/cm) were observed at this station.

From U.S. EPA (2016).

An analysis was performed to compare the example CMEC with an estimate of a tolerated maximum SC using salt-intolerant genus survival as the assessment endpoint. A scatter plot was constructed of the count of the 7 most salt-intolerant genera and maximum SC that occurred in the year prior to biological sampling (Fig. 8). The analysis showed that there is a negative relationship between maximum SC and number of salt-intolerant genera. There are few observations of salt-intolerant genera at sampling locations >630 μS/cm, the example CMEC.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Scatter plot of count of 7 most salt-intolerant genera and annual maximum specific conductivity (SC) in preceding year. Very few salt-intolerant genera are observed at sites with a SC greater than the example criterion maximum exposure concentration of 630 μS/cm (right of vertical dashed line). SC expressed as μS/cm.

From U.S. EPA (2016).

5. Discussion

Field-based methods to develop water quality criteria have many inherent advantages. Laboratory studies have the benefit of a controlled environment but often cannot replicate the range of conditions, exposure routes, effects, or interactions that occur in nature (Buchwalter et al., 2017; Cormier and Suter, 2013). In contrast, field exposures occur at realistic physical and chemical conditions, levels, proportions, and variability of pollutants. While field studies include covarying variables that may confound any presumed association between stressor and effect, the relative influence of potential confounders can be assessed and their influence mitigated by a number of approaches (Suter and Cormier, 2013). Organisms in the field have realistic nutrition and levels of stress. Field studies can include more taxa than are available in laboratory data sets (Cormier and Suter, 2013; Yang et al., 2017). Field data include sensitive taxa and life stages and indirect effects that can affect the susceptibility of populations to disease, predation, competition, and maladaptive behaviors. Therefore, having field-based methods can improve our understanding of pollutant effects. Field-based methods are especially valuable when available laboratory toxicity results do not match the exposures that are causing adverse effects in the field, as in the case of ionic mixtures.

As shown in the case example, extirpation of benthic invertebrates occurs at low levels of SC. This is consistent with previously published studies with similar ionic mixtures (e.g. Gerritsen et al., 2010; Palmer et al., 2010; Lindberg et al., 2011; Merriam et al., 2011; U.S. EPA, 2011a, 2011b; Bernhardt et al., 2012; Cormier et al., 2013a; Timpano et al., 2011, 2015; Dunlop et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2016). Mesocosm studies have begun to identify the modes of action that likely lead to extirpation in the field and corroborate effects observed in the field (Clements and Kotalik, 2016). Also, recent toxicity studies have begun to bridge the gap between physiological studies and field observations (Kefford et al., 2004; Kunz et al., 2013; Mount et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016, 2017; Erickson et al., 2017). The gradual coherence of diverse types of studies has strengthened the ability to develop scientifically defensible water quality criteria.

The development of a method to identify a protective short-term maximum exposure for SC was challenging. The failure to observe a salt-intolerant genus does not necessarily indicate that the genus is absent. For the example area, salt-intolerant genera are less likely to be observed during the summer when SC is most likely to be at its maximum for sites with variable SC. This occurs because many of the salt-intolerant genera have a life cycle that is keyed to availability of leaf litter (Cummins and Klug, 1979; Hershey et al., 2010). As a result, many salt-intolerant genera are very small and not usually observed during part of their life cycle that coincides with the maximum annual SC for a stream. In Appalachian streams, deciduous leaf abscission occurs September through November. Therefore, it is likely that a data set of temporally matched SC and the occurrence of a genus would not include short duration exposures that are tolerated.

A method similar to the field-based XCD method for developing a CCC (Cormier and Suter, 2013; U.S. EPA, 2016) could be adapted for an upper SC exposure limit. However, the necessary data collection effort would be almost prohibitive. The data set would have to include frequently collected SC samples to ensure measurement of the range of SC including those near the maximum. It would also require biological monitoring after the maximum exposure had occurred (e.g. in this example, the summer) and when surviving salt-intolerant genera are observable (e.g. generally in this example, the spring but not always). Because these data sets are expensive and rare, the field-based CMEC method was developed so that only a CCC and SD of the exposure of SC are required. The CCC may be derived from an XCD of paired biological and SC measurements (Cormier and Suter, 2013; Cormier et al., 2013a) which are data intensive. But, the CCC may also be derived from background SC and a preexisting background-to-criterion (B-C) model (Cormier et al., this issue). Large chemistry data sets of repeated samples of SC are available in the United States from state, U.S. EPA, and United States Geological Survey monitoring programs (https://water.usgs.gov/owq/data.html).

Although the primary objective of this paper was to demonstrate a method for developing a CMEC, an example CCC for a mountainous region of the eastern United States was also produced. The XCD05 of 305 μS/cm in Ecoregion 69 was similar to a previously published value of 295 μS/cm for a combined data set of adjacent Ecoregions 69 and 70 (U.S. EPA, 2011b). The 10 μS/cm difference is within the confidence bounds of the original benchmark for the combined data set of ecoregions 69 and 70 (U.S. EPA, 2011b). The slightly higher value is attributed to random variation and to <25 occurrences of some salt-sensitive genera in Ecoregion 69 compared to the combined area used in 2011. It is expected that ≤5% of aquatic life in streams in Central Appalachia would be extirpated when the annual geometric mean SC in a stream does not exceed the example CCC.

The primary objective was also met. When a CCC is known, a CMEC can be developed with multiple measurements of SC measurements from many sites. The CMEC for the example was 630 μS/cm. The CMEC derived using variance in SC data was biologically relevant. Salt-intolerant genera were commonly observed when the CMEC was not exceeded and rarely observed when it was exceeded (Fig. 8). However, the upper limit was only approximated. The paired biological data set is much smaller than the chemistry data set. Furthermore, the occurrence of only one genus in streams >500 μS/cm could indicate that this CMEC method is not sufficiently protective. Observations of some salt-intolerant genera could be spurious. Salt-intolerant genera not seen above a confluence have been observed below the confluence with low SC tributaries (Pond et al., 2014). As a precaution, a short duration for a CMEC of one day is recommended and a CMEC needs to be used together with a protective CCC (U.S. EPA, 2012).

All the analyses presented in this paper were repeated for an adjacent ecoregion, the Western Allegheny Plateau, Ecoregion 70. Salt-intolerant genera were commonly observed when the example CMEC for Ecoregion 70 was not exceeded and rarely observed when it was exceeded (U.S. EPA, 2016). The example CCC was 340 μS/cm. The example CMEC was 680 μS/cm. In addition, a wealth of information was collected regarding individual genera. These include: seasonal and geographical occurrences of each genus, XC95 values, and the probability of occurrence of each genus at a SC level. Both raw data and related graphs and tables are publicly available to enable additional analysis and synthesis by other researchers.

6. Conclusions

A CMEC can be estimated by defining the variability of SC over the course of a year and calculating the 90th centile of observed SC measurement at locations meeting the CCC. Furthermore, the CMEC derived using the variance in SC data was biologically relevant. Salt-intolerant genera were commonly observed when the CMEC was not exceeded and rarely observed when it was exceeded (Fig. 8). The case example demonstrates that the method is a pragmatic solution to the problem of deriving an acute field-based criterion to complement a chronic criterion. The method may be applicable to pollutants other than SC. In summary, this practical field-based method for developing a CMEC is scientifically defensible and ecologically relevant for the protection and recovery of streams from excess loadings of dissolved minerals.

A CCC is required for the calculation of a CMEC with this field-based method. The XC95 values that were used in the XCDs are listed in the order of least to most salt-tolerant in Appendix A. The generalized additive model plots are depicted in Appendix B. The weighted CFDs are shown in Appendix C. Appendix D provides a table of the number of samples with reported genera and specific conductivity in the data set used to derive the example criterion continuous concentration. Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.136.

Data sets

Data sets and individual XCD results used to develop the B-C model are available at the U.S. EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway (Cormier 2017a,b).

The file “biosample69.csv” is a data set of environmental parameters for ecoregion 69 developed by excluding records lacking biology samples, lacking conductivity measurement, having pH ≤6 samples; samples dominated by chloride, i.e. ([SO42+] + [HCO3] < [Cl]). It is available from the U. S. EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway at https://doi.org/10.23719/1371704 or directly from the distribution link https://pasteur.epa.gov/uploads/A-k998/482/CMEC%20Data%20sets.zip.

The file “eco69_dupchem.csv” includes station-years with at least 6 conductivity samples (one in the spring and one in the summer) from Ecoregion 69 in West Virginia, maximum conductivity, and number of sensitive taxa. It is available from the U.S. EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway at https://doi.org/10.23719/1371704 or directly from the distribution link https://pasteur.epa.gov/uploads/A-k998/482/CMEC%20Data%20sets.zip.

The file “ss.csv” is a matrix of benthic invertebrate observations in Ecoregion 69. Developed by removing ambiguous taxa, and non-reference taxa in this ecoregion in the WV data set. It is available from the U.S. EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway at https://doi.org/10.23719/1371707 or directly from the distribution link https://pasteur.epa.gov/uploads/A-r4z3/527/Data%20Biological.zip.

Supplementary Material

Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D

Highlights.

  • Chronic and acute exposure limits characterize freshwater invertebrate tolerances.

  • An acute value can be estimated from a normal distribution of the exposure levels.

  • This practical approach uses chemistry data with multiple within-year measurements.

  • Example continuous and maximum criteria are derived for an ionic mixture.

  • The method is applicable anywhere with a suitable data set.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by and prepared at the U.S. EPA, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati Division and Office of Water, Health, and Ecological Criteria Division, Washington, DC. The authors are indebted to the work of field and laboratory personnel that generated the primary data. The research was reviewed by an independent, contractor-managed, 5-scientist panel. It was also extensively discussed and reviewed by a technical workgroup including the U.S. EPA Office of Water, Regional Offices and Office of Research and Development. The manuscript has been subjected to the agency’s peer and administrative review and approved for publication. However, the views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. EPA. Tom Schaffner, Lisa Walker, and Michael Gallagher edited and formatted the document. Constructive comments from Glenn Suter and Dan Petersen and from anonymous reviewers helped to substantially improve an earlier version of this manuscript.

Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Abbreviations

B-C

biological condition

CCC

criterion continuous concentration

CFD

cumulative frequency distribution

CMEC

criterion maximum exposure concentration

DO

dissolved oxygen

XCD05

5th centile of XCD

LOWESS

LOcally WEighted Scatterplot Smoother

NOx

total nitrates and nitrites

RBP

rapid bioassessment protocol

SC

specific conductivity

SD

standard deviation

TSS

total suspended solids

U.S. EPA

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

WABbase

Watershed Assessment Branch database

WVDEP

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection

XCD

extirpation concentration distribution

XCD05

5th centile of XCD

XC95

Extirpation concentration values at the 95th centile

References

  1. Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB, 1999. In: 2nd ed. (Ed.), Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC: EPA/841/B99/002. https://www3.epa.gov/region1/npdes/merrimackstation/pdfs/ar/AR-1164.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernhardt ES, Lutz BD, King RS, Fay JP, Carter CE, Helton AM, Campagna D, Amos J, 2012. How many mountains can we mine? Assessing the regional impact of surface mining on freshwater ecosystems of the Central Appalachians. Environ. Sci. Technol 46, 8115–8122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchwalter DB, Clements WH, Luoma SN, 2017. Modernizing water quality criteria in the United States: A need to expand the definition of acceptable data. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 36 (2):285–291. 10.1002/etc.3654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cañedo-Argüelles M, Kefford BJ, Piscart C, Prat N, Schafer RB, Schulz C-J, 2013. Salinization of rivers: an urgent ecological issue. Environ. Pollut 173, 157–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CCME, 2007. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment http://ceqg-rcqe.ccme.ca/en/index.html.
  6. Clements WH, Kotalik C, 2016. Effects of major ions on natural benthic communities: an experimental assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency aquatic life benchmark for conductivity. Freshw. Sci 35, 126–138. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cormier SM, 2017a. Data for: Field-based methods for evaluating the annual maximum specific conductivity tolerated by freshwater invertebrates. 10.23719/1371704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Cormier SM, 2017b. Data for: A field-based model of the relationship between extirpation of salt-intolerant benthic invertebrates and background conductivity. 10.23719/1371704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Cormier SM, Suter GW, 2013. A method for deriving water-quality benchmarks using field data. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 32 (2), 255–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cormier SM, Suter GW, Zheng L, 2013a. Derivation of a benchmark for freshwater ionic strength. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 32 (2), 263–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cormier SM, Wilkes SP, Zheng L, 2013b. Relationship of land use and elevated ionic strength in Appalachian watersheds. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 32 (2), 296–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cormier SM, Zheng L, Flaherty CM, 2017. A field-based model of a relationship between extirpation of salt-intolerant benthic invertebrates and background conductivity. Sci. Total Environ (this issue). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cummins KW, Klug MJ, 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 10, 147–172. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dunlop JE, Mann RM, Hobbs D, Smith REW, Nanjappa V, Vardy S, Vink S, 2015. Assessing the toxicity of saline waters: the importance of accommodating surface water ionic composition at the river basin scale. Australas. Bull. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Chem 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  15. Environment Canada, Health Canada, 2001. Priority substances list assessment report: road salts. Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2008/02/07/370423/EnvironmentCanadareport.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  16. Erickson RJ, Stephan CE, 1988. Calculation of the Final Acute Value for Water Quality Criteria for Aquatic Organisms. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN: EPA/600/3–88-018. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100OJZ6.PDF?Dockey=P100OJZ6.PDF. [Google Scholar]
  17. Erickson RJ, Mount DR, Highland TL, Hockett JR, Hoff DJ, Jenson CT, Norberg-King TJ, Peterson KN, 2017. The acute toxicity of major ion salts to Ceriodaphnia dubia. II. Empirical relationships in binary salt mixtures. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 36 (6), 1525–1537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. European Commission, 2011. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), Guidance Document No. 27, Technical Guidance for Deriving Environmental Quality Standards. Technical Report – 2011–055. European Communities, Brussels, Belgium: https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/0cc3581b-5f65-4b6f-91c6-433a1e947838/TGD-EQS%20CIS-WFD%2027%20EC%202011.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  19. Findlay SE, Kelly VR, 2011. Emerging indirect and long-term road salt effects on ecosystems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 1223:58–68. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05942.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fritz KM, Fulton S, Johnson BR, Barton CD, Jack JD, Word DA, Burke RA, 2010. Structural and functional characteristics of natural and constructed channels draining a reclaimed mountaintop removal and valley fill coal mine. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc 29, 673–689. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gerritsen J, Zheng L, Burton J, Boschen C,Wilkes S, Ludwig J, Cormier S, 2010. Inferring Causes of Biological Impairment in the Clear Fork Watershed, West Virginia. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=201963. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gillis P, 2011. Assessing the toxicity of sodium chloride to the glochidia of freshwater mussels: implications for salinization of surface waters. Environ. Pollut 159 (6), 1702–1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Griffith MB, 2014. Natural variation and current reference for specific conductivity and major ions in wadeable streams of the coterminous U.S. Freshw. Sci 33 (1), 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hershey AE, Lamberti GA, Chaloner DT, Northington RM, 2010. Aquatic insect ecology In: Thorp JH, Covich AP (Eds.), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Elsevier, Inc., Burlington, MA, pp. 659–694. [Google Scholar]
  25. Higgins C,Wilde G, 2005. The role of salinity in structuring fish assemblages in a prairie stream system. Hydrobiologia 549, 197–203. [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson BJ, Johnson MK, 2015. An evaluation of a field-based aquatic life benchmark for Specific conductance in Northeast Minnesota. Prepared for Water Legacy. http://waterlegacy.org/sites/default/files/u42412/Ex.16_JohnsonMNConductivityEvaluationRpt%26Attachments(Nov.%202015).pdf.
  27. Johnson RC, Jin H-S, Carreiro MM, Jack JD, 2013. Macroinvertebrate community structure, secondary production and trophic-level dynamics in urban streams affected by non-point-source pollution. Freshw. Biol 58, 843–857. [Google Scholar]
  28. Karatayev A, Miller TD, Burlakova L, 2012. Long-term changes in unionid assemblages in the Rio Grande, one of the World’s top 10 rivers at risk. Aquat. Conserv 22, 206–219. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaushal SS, Groffman PM, Likens GE, Belt KT, Stack WP, Kelly VR, Band LE, Fisher GT, 2005. Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 102:13517–13520. 10.1073/pnas.0506414102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kaushal SS, Likens GE, Utz RM, Pace ML, Grese M, Yepsen M, 2013. Increased river alkalinization in the Eastern U.S. Environ. Sci. Technol 47 (18):10302–10311. 10.1021/es401046s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kefford BJ, Papas PJ, Metzeling L, Nugegoda D, 2004. Do laboratory salinity tolerances of freshwater animals correspond with their field salinity? Environ. Pollut 129 (3), 355–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kefford BJ, Hickey GL, Gasith A, Ben-David E, Dunlop JE, Palmer CG, Allan K, Choy SC, Piscart C, 2012. Global scale variation in the salinity sensitivity of riverine macroinvertebrates: eastern Australia, France, Israel and South Africa. PLoS One 7, e35224 10.1371/journal.pone.0035224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kunz JL, Conley JM, Buchwalter DB, Norber-King TJ, Kemble NE, Wang N, Ingersoll CG, 2013. Use of reconstituted waters to evaluate effects of elevated major ions associated with mountaintop coal mining on freshwater invertebrates. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 32 (12), 2826–2835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lindberg TT, Bernhardt ES, Bier R, Helton AM, Merola RB, Vengosh A, Di Giulio RT, 2011. Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 108 (52), 20920–20934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mebane CA, Eakins RJ, Fraser BG, Adams WJ, 2015. Recovery of a mining damaged stream ecosystem. Elem. Sci. Anth 3:42 https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000042 . https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000042https://elementascience.org/articles/42. https://elementascience.org/articles/42 . [Google Scholar]
  36. Merriam ER, Petty JT, Merovich GT, Fulton JB, Strager MP, 2011. Additive effects of mining and residential development on stream conditions in a central Appalachian watershed. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc 30 (2), 399–418. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mount DR, Erickson RJ, Highland TL, Hockett JR, Hoff DJ, Jenson CT, Norberg-King TJ, Peterson KN, Polaske ZM, Wisniewskiz S, 2016. The acute toxicity of major ion salts to Ceriodaphnia dubia: I. Influence of background water chemistry. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 35 (12), 3039–3057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Omernik JM, 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Am.Geogr 77,118–125. [Google Scholar]
  39. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Schlesinger WH, Eshleman KN, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Hendryx MS, Lemly AD, Likens GE, Loucks OL, Power ME, White PS, Wilcock PR, 2010. Science and regulation. Mountaintop mining consequences. Science 327 (5962):148–149. 10.1126/science.1180543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pond GJ, 2010. Patterns of Ephemeroptera taxa loss in Appalachian headwater streams (Kentucky, USA). Hydrobiologia 641, 185–201. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pond GJ, Passmore ME, Borsuk FA, Reynolds L, Rose CJ, 2008. Downstream effects of mountaintop coal mining: comparing biological conditions using family and genus level macroinvertebrate bioassessment tools. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc 27 (3), 717–737. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pond GJ, Passmore ME, Pointon ND, Felbinger JK, Walker CA, Krock KJ, Fulton JB, Nash WL, 2014. Long-term impacts on macroinvertebrates downstream of reclaimed mountaintop mining valley fills in central Appalachia. Environ. Manag 54 (4), 919–933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: http://www.R-project.org. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stephan CE, Mount DI, Hansen DJ, Gentile JR, Chapman GA, Brungs WA, 1985. Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN: PB85–227049. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-02/documents/guidelines-water-quality-criteria.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stoddard JL, Larsen DP, Hawkins CP, Johnson RK, Norris RH, 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecol. Appl 16 (4), 1267–1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Suter GW, Cormier SM, 2013. A method for assessing the potential for confounding applied to ionic strength in central Appalachian streams. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 32 (2), 288–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Timpano A, Schoenholtz S, Zipper C, Soucek D, 2011. Levels of Dissolved Solids Associated With Aquatic Life Effects in Headwater Streams of Virginia’s Central Appalachian Coalfield Region Report Prepared for the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality; Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy; and the Powell River Project. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA: http://www.prp.cses.vt.edu/ResearchResults/Timpano_TDSReport_2011.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  48. Timpano AJ, Schoenholtz SH, Soucek DJ, Zipper CE, 2015. Salinity as a limiting factor for biological condition in mining-influenced central Appalachian headwater streams. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc 51 (1):240–250. 10.1111/jawr.12247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. USEPA, 2011a. The Effects of Mountaintop Mines and Valley Fills on Aquatic Ecosystems of the Central Appalachian Coalfields. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC: EPA/600/R09/138F. http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100E3KG.txt. [Google Scholar]
  50. USEPA, 2011b. A Field-based Aquatic Life Benchmark for Conductivity in Central Appalachian Streams U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC: EPA/600/R-10/023F. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?Deid=233809. [Google Scholar]
  51. USEPA, 2012. Recreational Water Quality Criteria. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC: Office of Water 820-F-12–058. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/rwqc2012.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  52. USEPA, 2013. Primary Distinguishing Characteristics of Level III Ecoregions of the Continental United States. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/us/Eco_Level_III_descriptions.doc.
  53. USEPA, 2016. Public Review Draft: Field-based Methods for Developing Aquatic Life Criteria for Specific Conductivity. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC: EPA-822 R-07–010. Available online at: https://www.epa.gov/wqc/draft-field-based-methods-developing-aquatic-life-criteria-specific-conductivity. [Google Scholar]
  54. van Vlaardingen PLA, Verbruggen EMJ, 2007. Guidance for the Derivation of Environmental Risk Limits Within the Framework of ‘International and National Environmental Quality Standards for Substances in the Netherlands’ (INS). RIVM report 601782001/2007. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=7b0fb80c-5933-4fa1-b11f-dc077592fd2f&type=org&disposition=inline. [Google Scholar]
  55. Vander Laan JJ, Hawkins CP, Olson JR, Hill RA, 2013. Linking land use, in-stream stressors, and biological condition to infer causes of regional ecological impairment in streams. Freshw. Sci 32, 801–820. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang N, Dorman RA, Ingersoll CG, Hardest DK, Brumbaugh WG, Hammer EJ, Bauer CR, Mount DR, 2016. Acute and chronic toxicity of sodium sulfate to four freshwater organisms in water-only exposures. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 35, 115–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang N, Ivey CD, Ingersoll CG, Brumbaugh WG, Alvarez D, Hammer EJ, Bauer CR,Augspurger T, Raimondo S, Barnhart MC, 2017. Acute sensitivity of a broad range of freshwater mussels to chemicals with different modes of toxic action.Environ. Toxicol. Chem 36 (3), 786–796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Warne M, Batley GE, van Dam RA, Chapman JC, Fox DR, Hickey CW, Stauber JL, 2015. Revised Method for Deriving Australian and New Zealand Water Quality Guideline Values for Toxicants. Prepared for the Council of Australian Government’s Standing Council on Environment and Water (SCEW). Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, Brisbane, Queensland https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/download?pid=csiro:EP159161&dsid=DS4 (43 pp). [Google Scholar]
  59. Woods AJ, Omernik JM, Brown DD, 1996. Level III and IV Ecoregions of Pennsylvania and the Blue Ridge Mountains, the Central Appalachian Ridge and Valley, and the Central Appalachians of Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR EPA/600/R-96/077. http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=91024W05.TXT. [Google Scholar]
  60. Woods AJ, Omernick JM, Brown DD, 1999. Level III and IV Ecoregions of Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR: https://extension.umd.edu/sites/default/files/_docs/programs/master-gardeners/Natives/1999_Woods_Omernik_reg3_ecoregion_descriptions.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  61. WVDEP, 2006. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Watershed Branch Monitoring Activities. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water and Waste Management, Charleston, WV: http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/watershed/Documents/2005_06_SOP_All.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  62. WVDEP, 2008a. West Virginia Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Charleston, VA: http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/watershed/IR/Documents/IR_2008_Documents/WV_IR_2008_Report_Only_EPA_Approved.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  63. WVDEP, 2008b. 2008 Standard Operating Procedures. vol. 1 West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment Branch, Charleston, WV. [Google Scholar]
  64. WVDEP, 2013Watershed Assessment Branch 2013 Standard Operating Procedures. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Charleston, VA: Available online at:. http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/watershed/Pages/WBSOPs.aspx (443 pp). [Google Scholar]
  65. WVDEP, 2015. Watershed Assessment Branch 2015 Field Sampling Standard Operating Procedures. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water and Waste Management, Watershed Assessment Branch, Charleston, WV: http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/watershed/wqmonitoring/Documents/SOP%20Doc/2015WABSOP/2015%20WAB%20Field%20Sampling%20SOP.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yang J, Zhang X, Xie Y, Song C, Sun J, Zhang Y, Giesy JP, Yu H, 2017. Ecogenomics of zooplankton community reveals ecological threshold of ammonia nitrogen. Environ. Sci. Technol 51 (5), 3057–3064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zalizniak L, Kefford B, Nugegoda D, 2006. Is all salinity the same? I. The effect of ionic compositions on the salinity tolerance of five species of freshwater invertebrates. Mar. Freshw. Res 57,75–82. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhao Q, Jia X, Xia R, Lin J, Zhang Y, 2016. A field-based method to derive macroinvertebrate benchmark for specific conductivity adapted for small data sets and demonstrated in the Hun-Tai River Basin, Northeast China. Environ. Pollut 216: 902–910. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zielinski RA, Otton JK, Johnson CA, 2001. Sources of salinity near a coal mine spoil pile, north-central Colorado. J. Environ. Qual 30:1237–1248. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11476501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D

RESOURCES