Abstract
The obligate intracellular pathogen Coxiella burnetii is the causative agent of the worldwide zoonotic disease Q fever. This Gram-negative bacterium infects macrophages where it establishes a replicative niche in an acidic and phagolysosome-like vacuole. Establishing and maintaining the niche requires a functional type IV secretion system (T4SS) which translocates multiple effector proteins into the host cell. These effector proteins act by manipulating diverse cellular processes allowing the bacterium to establish an infection and complete its complex biphasic developmental cycle. The lengthy nature of this life cycle suggests that C. burnetii has to successfully deal with cellular defense processes. Cell death is one mechanism infected cells frequently utilize to control or to at least minimize the impact of an infection. To date, four effector proteins have been identified in C. burnetii, which interfere with the induction of cell death. Three, AnkG, CaeA, and CaeB, affect intrinsic apoptosis, CaeA additionally extrinsic apoptosis. The proteins target different steps of the apoptotic pathway and are not conserved among isolates suggesting redundancy as an important feature of cell death inhibition. The fourth effector protein, IcaA, interferes with the non-canonical pathway of pyroptosis, an important inflammatory cell death pathway for controlling infectious disease. Autophagy is relevant for the C. burnetii life-cycle, but to which extent autophagic cell death is a factor in bacterial survival and proliferation is still not clear. To convincingly understand how bacterial manipulation of autophagy affects cell death either directly or indirectly will require further experiments. Collectively, C. burnetii modulates the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways and non-canonical pyroptosis to inhibit host cell death, thereby providing a stable, intracellular niche for the course of the pathogen’s infectious cycle.
Keywords: Coxiella, intracellular pathogen, apoptosis, pyroptosis, autophagy
Introduction
In multicellular organisms, the death of individual cells is frequently a fundamental and essential biological activity and not just an accidental event. Without purposeful, active cell death, physiological processes in animal development, stress response, tissue homeostasis, and defense against infection are impaired in their course of action [1]. Since the initial descriptions of necrosis in the 19th century and of apoptosis in 1972 [2], new types of active, regulated cell death, such as pyroptosis, NETosis, entosis, ferroptosis, and others, have been described (for a review, see [3]). Several of these cell death pathways have important and sometimes diverse roles during microbial infection. In some cases, cell death is detrimental for the host. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, for example, triggers macrophage ferroptosis in a mouse infection model to further bacterial growth and dissemination [4]. Enteropathogenic yersiniae induce apoptosis in macrophages [5] and in dendritic cells in vitro [6]. Apoptosis induction not only counteracts innate immunity, but also contributes in vivo in a murine infection model to the inhibition of the adaptive immune system by suppressing the development of an effective CD8 T cell response [6]. In other cases, death of the infected cells benefits the host. Apoptosis is viewed as an important means of innate immunity to clear cells damaged by an infectious agent from the host [7]. Apoptosis of alveolar macrophages, for example, contributes to clearance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in a resolving mouse model of pulmonary infection [8]. Pyroptosis, on the other hand, protects mice from lethal infection with cytosol-invasive bacteria, such as Burkholderia thailandensis [9].
Not surprisingly, pathogens have developed many different mechanisms which actively engage these cellular defenses to allow microbial dissemination within the host organism or which, alternatively, inhibit pathway execution to ensure pathogen survival within the host cell. The latter is especially important for obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens, such as Coxiella burnetii, because they rely entirely on the host cell to provide them with essential substrates to maintain bacterial physiology and replication. This requires sophisticated modulation of host cell death pathways by bacterial virulence factors (for a review, see [10]).
The Life and Times of Coxiella burnetii as an Intracellular Pathogen
Coxiella burnetii is the highly-infectious causative agent of the zoonosis Q fever. It is an obligate intracellular, Gram-negative bacterium with worldwide distribution, except in New Zealand [11,12]. Infection typically occurs by inhalation of an environmentally stable, highly infectious form with a minimal infectious dose of less than ten bacteria. C. burnetii infects many different vertebrate and invertebrate host species including, for example, humans, ruminants, birds, reptiles, and ticks [13], but domestic ruminant livestock are considered to represent the main natural reservoir. Their infection is often symptom-free. However, infected sheep and goats may experience abortion, stillbirth, and delivery of enfeebled lambs [14,15]. Infected animals excrete the bacteria through vaginal secretions, milk, and feces [16], but primarily and in large numbers in birth products. Bacteria shed in such a manner are responsible for the majority of human Q fever cases and can even lead to large outbreaks, as reported in the Netherlands, with roughly 4000 cases from 2007 to 2010 [17], Germany [18], Israel [19], and other countries throughout the world. The clinical presentation of a C. burnetii infection can vary widely, depending on both bacterial and host factors (reviewed in [11]). In humans, the acute course of Q fever can be asymptomatic or flu-like, accompanied with fever and headache. It is usually self-limiting. In severe cases, an atypical pneumonia and hepatitis may occur. Pregnant women also show abortion, stillbirth, premature birth, and birth of weak infants. In rare cases, the infection can become chronic years after infection, with endocarditis as the most common manifestation. It has also been put forward that a chronic fatigue syndrome can develop as long-term complication of an infection (reviewed in [11]).
An infection begins after passive uptake of the bacterium by the host cell, which requires actin rearrangement. The Coxiella-containing vacuole (CCV) then traverses the default endocytic pathway maturing from an early endosome to the phagolysosome stage (reviewed in [20,21]). C. burnetii is one-of-a-kind among intracellular bacteria by not only replicating in such an acidic phagolysosome-like compartment, but to actually require these harsh conditions for metabolic activation and translocation of the effector proteins used to manipulate cellular processes [22,23]. C. burnetii uses a type IV secretion system (T4SS) [24] to transport roughly 150 effector proteins into the host cell where they interact with diverse host cell processes, such as apoptosis, autophagy, and endolysosomal trafficking (see [25] for a review). This interaction network establishes the replicative niche for the biphasic developmental cycle of the pathogen, which alternates between a metabolically dormant, environmentally more stable, spore-like small cell variant (SCV) and a metabolically-active, replicating large cell variant (LCV) [26]. Since the infectious cycle is lengthy and occurs without gross adverse effects to the host cell, the bacteria must have found ways to maintain cell viability possibly by disrupting cell death processes typically used to limit infections. This interference might even be relevant in vivo, as fewer apoptotic cells were detected in placentas from northern fur seals infected with C. burnetii than in placentas from non-infected seals [27]. How the bacterial pathogen interferes with the different types of host cell death is the topic of this review. Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and autophagy will preferentially be in the spotlight, since necrosis/necroptosis and other cell death pathways have not been linked to C. burnetii infections to date.
Apoptosis and its Manipulation by C. burnetii
Apoptosis, reviewed by [1,3,28], is morphologically characterized by blebbing of the plasma membrane, shrinking of the cell body, nuclear condensation and fragmentation, as well as formation of membrane-bound apoptotic bodies. If the latter are rapidly phagocytosed, apoptosis does not induce inflammation, since cytoplasmic content is not released to the extracellular milieu. There are two major subtypes of apoptosis – intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis. Intrinsic apoptosis is often initiated by cellular stress and involves mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization which is regulated by members of the Bcl-2 family of proteins. Permeabilized mitochondria release cytochrome c resulting in the formation of a large macromolecular complex, termed the apoptosome. Subsequently, initiator and executioner cysteine proteases, known as caspases, are activated. Extrinsic apoptosis, which pathogenic bacteria can also trigger, involves ligand binding at death receptors, followed by their dimerization, recruitment of the adaptor protein FADD and activation of initiator and executioner caspases. Processed executioner caspases then cleave many different cellular substrates, ultimately resulting in cell death.
Coxiella burnetii inhibits both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis in different cell types (Figure 1), such as immune and epithelial cells, and in its virulent phase I and avirulent phase II forms [29,30]. The bacterium also promotes survival by activating Akt, Erk1/2, and p38 signaling [31,32] and by subverting cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity [33]. A functional T4SS is essential for the anti-apoptotic activity [34] and several secreted T4SS effector proteins have been identified which interfere with apoptosis [35,36]. So far, AnkG (CBU0781) is the best-characterized of these. AnkG exhibits its anti-apoptotic activity in the cell nucleus where it is transported by two direct interactions with cellular proteins, which bind to different sites in its N-terminal 69 residues [37,38]. The first involves binding to p32 via an arginine rich region encompassing arginine residues 22 and 23 of AnkG [37]. This interaction with p32 is ingenious, because it couples transport of AnkG with stress-induced p32 trafficking to the cell nucleus. After migration to the nucleus, AnkG uptake is mediated by binding of importin-α1 to a serine/threonine-rich region at residues 8-14, which acts as an alternative nuclear localization signal [38]. This interaction was discovered, because the ankG allele from the Dugway strain, with a leucine codon at residue eleven instead of an isoleucine codon like the Nine Mile (NM) strain, displayed better protection from staurosporine-induced apoptosis than the NM variant, when ectopically expressed in CHO cells [38]. The anti-apoptotic activity of AnkG also resides within these first 69 amino acids. However, neither its mechanism of action nor any host proteins involved have been identified or characterized to date. Another open question is if the remaining residues 70-338 of AnkG have a biological function apart from T4SS-mediated translocation and possibly, a role in intracellular trafficking, since ectopically expressed deletion mutants containing either residues 1-69 or 70-388 of AnkG are localized mainly in the nucleus or in the cytoplasm, respectively, under both healthy and apoptotic conditions [37]. A caveat that should also be kept in mind, is that secreted, 3xFlag-tagged AnkG is located in the cell nucleus during an infection [38], indicating cell stress. But AnkG, when ectopically expressed as a GFP fusion protein in transfected cell lines, is mainly mitochondria-associated and only transported to the nucleus after the cell has received an apoptotic stimulus [35,37]. Thus, even though heterologous expression experiments are extremely helpful in dissecting the molecular mechanism(s) of a process, they do not necessarily reflect the physiological status of an interaction.
Figure 1.
Schematic overview of cell death pathways affected by Coxiella burnetii effector proteins. Relevant sections of different cell death pathways and the interference of C. burnetii T4SS effector proteins (green boxes) with these pathways are shown. The anti-apoptotic effector protein AnkG migrates to the nucleus (blue circle), is imported, and fulfills its activity by a hitherto unknown mechanism. CaeB is localized to the ER (light blue oval) and possibly also to the mitochondrium (petrol box). CaeB inhibits apoptosis by interference with the mitochondrial pathway after Bax/Bak activation and inhibition of MOMP (light purple star). CaeA is localized in the nucleus, but acts far downstream in the apoptotic pathway by inhibiting the activation of Caspase-7 (interrupted line). Furthermore, an infection with C. burnetii facilitates the dimerization of Beclin-1 and Bcl-2 by an unknown mechanism to inhibit cell death. Additionally, there is an influence on cAMP signaling leading to phosphorylation of Bad, which is recruited to the Coxiella-containing vacuole (CCV; red circle) thereby inhibiting its pro-apoptotic features. The p38 signaling pathway is also influenced, leading to anti-apoptotic transcription/translation activity. C. burnetii also inhibits Caspase-11 activation via the effector protein IcaA. Hence, there is no inflammasome formation and no Caspase-1 activation, which in concert prevents pyroptosis. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is depicted as an orange box, which interacts with cellular pattern recognition receptors (purple box). Other cellular proteins are also represented by purple boxes.
Another anti-apoptotic protein [39] secreted by C. burnetii is CaeB (CBU1532), a potent inhibitor of intrinsic apoptosis [36,40]. Narrowing down the point of action of CaeB using an inducible expression system, immunoblotting and staining of the mitochondrial potential revealed that CaeB acts after Bax activation and mitochondrial targeting, but before mitochondrial outer membrane polarization, indicating an intra-mitochondrial block in apoptotic signaling (Figure 1) [36]. Formation of the apoptotic pore in the mitochondrial outer membrane, which is a complex process involving protein constitution, lipid composition and mitochondrial architecture [41], would be such an attractive potential candidate. Where and how CaeB blocks mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization remains an open question, as also the subcellular localization of CaeB is unclear. Thus, one report suggests mitochondrial localization of a 3xFlag-tagged protein [39] and another demonstrated colocalization of GFP- or HA-tagged CaeB with the ER [42]. Further research is required to determine the molecular mode of action of CaeB.
The C. burnetii effector protein CaeA (CBU1524) inhibits both extrinsic and intrinsic host cell apoptosis by a yet unknown molecular mechanism [43]. CaeA, when ectopically expressed in HeLa cells, is found in the cell nucleus [39], but acts far downstream in the cell death cascade by preventing cleavage of the executioner caspase-7, but not of the initiator caspase-9 (Figure 1) [43]. This might explain the observed inhibition of both apoptosis subtypes. It also suggests that CaeA acts indirectly, possibly by affecting expression of anti-apoptotic proteins. The presence of CaeA does lead to higher levels of survivin in host cells, but this is not responsible for apoptosis inhibition by CaeA. Sequence comparison of caeA alleles from different C. burnetii isolates revealed a crucial EK (glutamic acid/lysine) short tandem repeat motif, with CaeA variants containing three, four, or six copies having strong anti-apoptotic activity [43].
Pyroptosis is Inhibited by C. burnetii
Pyroptosis, reviewed in [44-46], is a proinflammatory form of regulated cell death, characterized by the activation of inflammatory caspase proteases. Pyroptotic cell death is inflammatory, but shares several morphological features with apoptosis, such as DNA fragmentation, caspase-3 activation, and annexin V staining. In murine cells, caspases-1 and -11 cleave the pro-pyroptotic factor gasdermin D to induce pore formation in the plasma membrane, while caspase-1 additionally cleaves pro-interleukin (IL)-1β and pro-IL-18 yielding the mature inflammatory cytokines. These cytokines, together with other intracellular contents, are released into the extracellular space through the pores formed by cleaved gasdermin D, and constitute the inflammatory nature of the process. Pyroptosis can be divided into two major subtypes: a caspase-1 dependent canonical form and a caspase-1 independent non-canonical form. The caspase-1 dependent pathway is activated by the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns or danger-associated molecular patterns by sensor proteins, followed by their oligomerization and the recruitment of the adaptor protein ASC. Oligomerized ASC binds and activates caspase-1 in the so-called inflammasome complex. Activated caspase-1 then cleaves its target molecules. The caspase-1 independent pathway (Figure 1) is specific for Gram-negative bacteria and involves caspases-4 and -5 in humans and caspase-11 in mice. These proteases are directly activated by the recognition of cytoplasmic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and then cleave gasdermin D. Pore formation in the plasma membrane acts as a feedback loop for canonical inflammasome formation, amplifying the pyroptotic inflammatory response. Pyroptosis initiates a strong inflammatory response to pathogens in immune cells, such as macrophages and monocytes, but also in other cell types, including intestinal epithelial cells [45]. This cell death pathway is, thus, an important defense mechanism of the innate immune system of humans as well as of animals.
Depending on the cell type studied, the avirulent Coxiella Nine Mile phase II (NMII) variant can either induce or inhibit pyroptosis. In murine peritoneal B1a cells, which are predominantly found in the periphery and are considered carriers of innate immunity [47], NMII activates, in a T4SS-dependent manner [48], pyroptosis via Toll-like receptor 2 signaling and canonical inflammasome formation. In contrast, the virulent Nine Mile phase I (NMI) strain does not trigger a pyroptotic response [48]. A similar pattern was observed in primary human alveolar macrophages [49]. Although the authors did not check for pyroptosis, infection with the NMII strain led to strong and sustained production of pro- and mature IL-1β, a hallmark of pyroptotic cell death, through 72 hours post infection. In contrast, levels of pro- and mature IL-1β in cells infected with the phase I strains NMI, G and Dugway were only transiently and negligibly detectable 24 hours post infection [49]. The observation that phase I strains did not induce IL-1β production and that the NMI strain did not induce pyroptosis suggested the presence of a mechanism to inhibit this kind of cell death thereby ensuring bacterial survival. Studies with bone marrow-derived and alveolar macrophages from different mouse strains revealed C. burnetii NMII inhibition of non-canonical inflammasome formation by preventing caspase-11 activation (Figure 1) [50]. The authors used a genetic screen in Legionella pneumophila to identify a responsible T4SS-secreted effector protein. The respective protein, previously known as CBU1823, was named IcaA (inhibition of caspase activation). Sequence analysis showed no known protein domains and no homology to other eukaryotic or prokaryotic proteins. Hence, its mechanism of action remains elusive. Inhibition of non-canonical, caspase-11 mediated pyroptosis by C. burnetii indicates that bacterial LPS does become exposed in the host cell cytoplasm where it would trigger caspase-11 activation.
Coxiella and Autophagy Involvement in Cell Death
Macroautophagy (hereafter called “autophagy”) is a ubiquitous, evolutionary conserved, stress-responsive, degradative pathway. It disposes of superfluous or potentially dangerous cytosolic material, such as damaged organelles, misfolded protein aggregates, and invading pathogens, by sequestration within so-called autophagosomes, which are double-membraned vesicles. The autophagosomes are delivered to lysosomes for degradation so that the material can be recycled. Physiological levels of autophagy promote cell survival (reviewed in [51-53]). Autophagy occupies a central position in the biology of most eukaryotes and many components of the autophagy apparatus partake in non-autophagic cell functions, with cell death being one of them [54]. It is still controversial whether cells truly die via autophagy or whether autophagy is merely a bystander in dying cells, although increasing evidence suggests that autophagic components may be essential for cell death in certain settings (reviewed in [54,55]). Likewise, excessive or uncontrolled levels of autophagy can also induce autophagy-dependent cell death [56]. With respect to bacterial infection, autophagy can have both pro- and anti-microbial effects [57].
The interaction of C. burnetii with the autophagy pathway has been intensively studied (nicely summarized by [25]). The phagolysosome-like character of the Coxiella-containing vacuole makes it an attractive target for fusion with autophagosomes and several autophagy markers are found in the CCV membrane. CCV fusion with autophagosomes is assumed to contribute to C. burnetii proliferation by providing membrane material for vacuole expansion and nutrients for macromolecular synthesis [58-60]. Autophagy is functionally connected to apoptosis by a regulatory interaction between Beclin-1 and Bcl-2 [56], but this does not necessarily lead to cell death. Overexpression of wild-type Beclin-1 does not affect the anti-apoptotic activity of C. burnetii, but it can titrate overexpressed Bcl-2, reducing its non-specific survival activity [61]. This indicates that autophagy can influence, via the level of free Beclin-1, the threshold for intrinsic apoptosis. Any control exerted here would be indirect. Overexpression of a Beclin-1 mutant, that does not interact with Bcl-2 and that can induce cell death [56], led to increased apoptotic cell death in transfected cells, even in cells infected with C. burnetii [61]. Unfortunately, autophagic flux was not measured simultaneously, so that it is not clear if the increase in cell death is due to excessive autophagy. While the effector protein Cig2/CvpB has been shown to be essential for converting the CCV to an organelle that is similar to the autolysosome [62,63], it does not seem that effector proteins are present to protect against the induction of excessive autophagy. If and how the bacterium controls autophagic flux to maintain levels beneficial for its survival and growth, is an interesting and open question that warrants further investigation.
Conclusion
The data presented above paint a picture of strong bacterial interference with pathways leading to host cell death. C. burnetii actively deploys multiple effector proteins to impede process progression. The redundancy observed here is one standout feature. In the case of apoptosis, three different effector proteins (AnkG, CaeA, and CaeB) have been identified to date. It can be expected that more anti-apoptotic proteins exist, as Martinez et al. [64] identified six C. burnetii transposon mutants which were unable to protect the cell from apoptosis-induction. Thus, the genes disrupted by the transposon might either encode for anti-apoptotic effector proteins or for proteins that influence the expression or translocation of anti-apoptotic effector proteins or of proteins that trigger pro-apoptotic signaling within the host cell. In addition, C. burnetii might harbor pro-apoptotic effector proteins [65]. The results obtained with the icaA deletion strain also clearly indicate that additional effector proteins must be present, which interfere with pyroptosis as well. The reasons for this redundancy are not clear and several explanations, not necessarily mutually exclusive, are possible. These effector proteins manipulate the cell death pathways at different steps, so that one could expect additional, novel anti-cell death effector proteins also to interfere with different steps in the various pathways. Thus, the anti-cell death effector proteins might be required in toto to address the many different extra- and intracellular signals and stresses that can lead to cell death, to ensure that all loopholes are covered. Alternatively, individual sets of anti-cell death effector proteins might be needed in each of the different cell types (macrophages, trophoblasts, epithelial cells) that can be infected by C. burnetii to address their specific requirements for maintaining cell viability.
Although it is possible that these proteins work in concert to subvert apoptotic cell death, there is no evidence for this to date. So far, each anti-cell death effector protein is able to inhibit apoptosis independently. But, since they are all actively secreted during infection, simultaneous, accumulated effects could be expected and it will be exciting to see if and how mutant strains containing single and multiple gene knock-outs are affected in their survival, pathogenicity, and virulence in cell culture and in vivo infection models.
None of the four effector proteins, which have been identified to date to interfere with cell death, are intact in all sequences of five different strains [25]. In the sequence of the CbuK-Q154 strain, the open reading frames (ORF) of all four genes are disrupted and only the sequence of the Dugway 5J108-111 strain features four intact ORFs [66]. In addition, their sequences display notable heterogeneity. This can be of functional relevance, with the AnkG variant from the Dugway strain displaying better protection from staurosporine-induced apoptosis than AnkG from the NM isolate [38]. Likewise, the number of EK repeats in CaeA correlates with protein integrity and anti-apoptotic activity [43]. Again, in both these and possibly in other cases as well, this could be due to one or more different reasons. For example, the mutational variation, at least in the intact mutants, reflects the threshold of activity required to fulfill the respective protein’s biological function. Or, the redundancy present in the total effector pool is still sufficient to ensure that the biological function is met in the absence of one or more effector proteins. It is also possible, that the characteristics of the cell death pathways encountered in the host cell types preferentially infected do not require the presence of the mutated effector protein(s). The resulting mosaic pattern of active effector proteins might then contribute to pathotype development or to a speciation process, if certain genes become dispensable in specific hosts.
C. burnetii also manipulates the autophagy pathway, most likely for membrane and nutrient acquisition. Since the Bcl-2/Beclin-1 interaction indicates a strong connection between autophagy and apoptosis pathways and both proteins are recruited to the CCV membrane, it appears highly likely that effector proteins targeting one pathway might also affect the other. Controlling this interaction can also serve as an elegant means to optimize the conditions for intracellular bacterial survival and replication, by inhibiting one (apoptosis) and, at the same time, facilitating the other (autophagy). The bacteria would additionally have to safeguard against excessive autophagy, which, by itself, can lead to cell death. These assumptions have to be validated and any potential effector proteins involved in the process identified.
Of the four Coxiella effector proteins identified so far to interfere with host cell death pathways, one, namely AnkG, displays at least transient mitochondrial localization. Mitochondria are not only important for apoptotic cell death. They are also the power stations of the eukaryotic cell and, furthermore, involved in maintaining ion homeostasis, the production of macromolecular precursors or the sequestration of potentially damaging metabolic byproducts [67]. Additionally, mitochondria take part in cellular communication, including a prominent role in cell death activation, via signaling pathways and contact with other cellular organelles [68]. It is therefore not astonishing that mitochondria are frequently targeted by pathogenic microorganisms [69,70]. Several other putative C. burnetii effector proteins also display mitochondrial localization – CBU1825 [39,71], CBU1425 and the pQ1H1 plasmid-encoded CBUA0020 [71], and also MceA (CBU0077; [72]). These effector proteins were identified by a multi-stage screening process. The first step involved either a bioinformatics-guided approach [71] or random shotgun cloning [39]. Candidates were tagged and tested in a bacterial translocation assay for delivery into the infected host cell. The localization of the translocated effector protein was then visualized by fluorescence microscopy of cells transiently transfected with plasmids ectopically expressing fusion proteins. Further experiments are required to determine if these mitochondrially localized effector proteins interfere with host cell viability or with other mitochondrial functions.
Outlook
As many of the mechanisms C. burnetii employs to manipulate host cell pathways are not understood in detail yet, especially at the molecular level, further interesting results can be expected. The recent description that T4SS-dependent recruitment of p62 to the CCV [60] leads to protein stabilization, which coincides with activation of the cytoprotective Nrf2-Keap1 pathway in infected cells [73], offers an exciting glimpse into novel fields for future research on cell survival and niche formation. With the bacterial T4SS secreting approximately 150 different known effector proteins and possibly even more, hitherto unknown proteins, it is also highly likely that progress in identifying additional actors involved and in characterizing the processes that they affect and the partners they interact with will be made. This has already become easier due to the concurrent development of defined axenic media that support host cell-free growth [74,75] and of genetic tools for generating chromosomal mutants [75-77]. Further improvement of and additions to the genetic toolbox will contribute to the functional characterization of effector proteins.
Cross-talk between the different cell-death pathways and functional redundancy of the C. burnetii effector proteins, as well as their importance in manipulating host cell pathways, suggest the presence of a kind of effector protein network established by C. burnetii to reprogram cellular physiology by affecting pivotal reactions and the corresponding proteins involved. Unraveling this network at the level of the exact molecular mechanisms and its temporal progression will be major challenges for future research, together with elucidating the external and internal stimuli leading to network setup and the concomitant regulation involved in component expression and delivery. The insight gained will not only advance our knowledge of bacterial pathogenicity and virulence, but also pinpoint and highlight key steps in the affected intracellular pathways, providing us with the added benefit of better understanding host cell physiology, too.
Many experiments have so far been performed with the NMII strain, due to its easier handling under BSL-2 conditions, and with murine and human cells and cell lines or mouse infection models, which is self-explanatory, due to the excellent characterization of both model systems and the depth of the method and reagent toolboxes, especially for the murine system. Nevertheless, to fully understand C. burnetii pathogenicity and virulence, we will have to improve our knowledge of the infection in reservoir hosts and host cells [78,79], also using highly virulent wild-type strains from different hosts and with different pathotypes, even if this means adapting and developing new protocols and reagents. Analysis of field isolates will be quite important, considering the differential conservation of effector proteins between individual isolates. But only then will we be able to better understand and explain strain differences in pathogenicity and/or virulence [80].
Ongoing effector protein structure-function analysis, improved host cell pathway and network characterization, expansion of ex vivo and in vivo model systems to reservoir hosts will, when combined, offer deeper insight into the mechanisms of intentional death of eukaryotic cells with a focus on the general interplay between host cell and pathogen. This should ultimately result in new approaches to better fight C. burnetii infections.
Acknowledgments
This publication was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the consortium Q-GAPS (Grant numbers 01KI1726A to AL and 01KI1726C to CB) as part of the Forschungsnetz Zoonotische Infektionskrankheiten and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through the grant LU1357/5-1 to AL.
Glossary
- T4SS
type IV secretion system
- NET
Neutrophil extracellular trap
- CCV
Coxiella-containing vacuole
- SCV
small cell variant
- LCV
large cell variant
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- MOMP
mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization
- FADD
Fas-associated protein with death domain
- NM
Nine Mile
- LPS
lipopolysaccharide
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
- HA
human influenza hemagglutinin
- IL
interleukin
- ASC
apoptosis-associated speck protein containing a CARD or Caspase activation and recruitment domain
- NMI
Nine Mile phase I
- NMII
Nine Mile phase II
- ORF
open reading frame
References
- Green DR. The coming decade of cell death research: five riddles. Cell. 2019;177(5):1094–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer. 1972;26(4):239–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang D, Kang R, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P, Kroemer G. The molecular machinery of regulated cell death. Cell Res. 2019;29:347–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amaral EP, Costa DL, Namasivayam S, Riteau N, Kamenyeva O, Mittereder L, et al. A major role for ferroptosis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced cell death and tissue necrosis. J Exp Med. 2019;216(3):556–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Monack DM, Mecsas J, Ghori N, Falkow S. Yersinia signals macrophages to undergo apoptosis and YopJ is necessary for this cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(19):10385–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trülzsch K, Geginat G, Sporleder T, Ruckdeschel K, Hoffmann R, Heesemann J, et al. Yersinia outer protein P inhibits CD8 T cell priming in the mouse infection model. J Immunol. 2005;174(7):4244–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamkanfi M, Dixit VM. Manipulation of host cell death pathways during microbial infections. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8(1):44–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dockrell DH, Marriott HM, Prince LR, Ridger VC, Ince PG, Hellewell PG, et al. Alveolar macrophage apoptosis contributes to pneumococcal clearance in a resolving model of pulmonary infection. J Immunol. 2003;171(10):5380–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aachoui Y, Kajiwara Y, Leaf IA, Mao D, Ting JP, Coers J, et al. Canonical inflammasomes drive IFN-g to prime caspase-11 in defense against a cytosol-invasive bacterium. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18(3):320–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedrich A, Pechstein J, Berens C, Lührmann A. Modulation of host cell apoptotic pathways by intracellular pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;35:88–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eldin C, Mélenotte C, Mediannikov O, Ghigo E, Million M, Edouard S, et al. From Q fever to Coxiella burnetii infection: a paradigm change. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30(1):115–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hilbink F, Penrose M, Kovacova E, Kazar J. Q fever is absent from New Zealand. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22(5):945–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Babudieri B. Q fever: a zoonosis In: Brandly CA, Jungherr EL. Adv Vet Sci. 5. New York, London: Academic Press; 1959. pp. 81–182. [Google Scholar]
- Moore JD, Barr BC, Daft BM, O’Connor MT. Pathology and diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii infection in a goat herd. Vet Pathol. 1991;28(1):81–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer NC, Kierstead M, Key DW, Williams JC, Peacock MG, Vellend H. Placentitis and abortion in goats and sheep in Ontario caused by Coxiella burnetii. Can Vet J. 1983;24(2):60–1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rousset E, Berri M, Durand B, Dufour P, Prigent M, Delcroix T, et al. Coxiella burnetii shedding routes and antibody response after outbreaks of Q fever-induced abortion in dairy goat herds. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(2):428–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roest HI, Tilburg JJ, van der Hoek W, Vellema P, van Zijderveld FG, Klaassen CH, et al. The Q fever epidemic in The Netherlands: history, onset, response and reflection. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139(1):1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilsdorf A, Kroh C, Grimm S, Jensen E, Wagner-Wiening C, Alpers K. Large Q fever outbreak due to sheep farming near residential areas, Germany, 2005. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136(8):1084–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amitai Z, Bromberg M, Bernstein M, Raveh D, Keysary A, David D, et al. A large Q fever outbreak in an urban school in central Israel. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(11):1433–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lührmann A, Newton HJ, Bonazzi M. Beginning to understand the role of the type IV secretion system effector proteins in Coxiella burnetii pathogenesis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;413:243–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Schaik EJ, Chen C, Mertens K, Weber MM, Samuel JE. Molecular pathogenesis of the obligate intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(8):561–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hackstadt T, Williams JC. Biochemical stratagem for obligate parasitism of eukaryotic cells by Coxiella burnetii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78(5):3240–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton HJ, McDonough JA, Roy CR. Effector protein translocation by the Coxiella burnetii Dot/Icm type IV secretion system requires endocytic maturation of the pathogen-occupied vacuole. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagai H, Kubori T. Type IVB secretion systems of Legionella and other Gram-negative bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larson CL, Martinez E, Beare PA, Jeffrey B, Heinzen RA, Bonazzi M. Right on Q: genetics begin to unravel Coxiella burnetii host cell interactions. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:919–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minnick MF, Raghavan R. Developmental biology of Coxiella burnetii. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;984:231–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myers E, Ehrhart EJ, Charles B, Spraker T, Gelatt T, Duncan C. Apoptosis in normal and Coxiella burnetii-infected placentas from Alaskan northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus). Vet Pathol. 2013;50(4):622–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagata S. Apoptosis and clearance of apoptotic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2018;36:489–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lührmann A, Roy CR. Coxiella burnetii inhibits activation of host cell apoptosis through a mechanism that involves preventing cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Infect Immun. 2007;75(11):5282–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voth DE, Howe D, Heinzen RA. Coxiella burnetii inhibits apoptosis in human THP-1 cells and monkey primary alveolar macrophages. Infect Immun. 2007;75(9):4263–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voth DE, Heinzen RA. Sustained activation of Akt and Erk1/2 is required for Coxiella burnetii antiapoptotic activity. Infect Immun. 2009;77(1):205–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cherla R, Zhang Y, Ledbetter L, Zhang G. Coxiella burnetii inhibits neutrophil apoptosis by exploiting survival pathways and antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1. Infect Immun. 2018;86(4):e00504–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macdonald LJ, Graham JG, Kurten RC, Voth DE. Coxiella burnetii exploits host cAMP-dependent protein kinase signalling to promote macrophage survival. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16(1):146–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beare PA, Gilk SD, Larson CL, Hill J, Stead CM, Omsland A, et al. Dot/Icm type IVB secretion system requirements for Coxiella burnetii growth in human macrophages. mBio. 2011;2(4):e00175–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lührmann A, Nogueira CV, Carey KL, Roy CR. Inhibition of pathogen-induced apoptosis by a Coxiella burnetii type IV effector protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(44):18997–9001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klingenbeck L, Eckart RA, Berens C, Lührmann A. The Coxiella burnetii type IV secretion system substrate CaeB inhibits intrinsic apoptosis at the mitochondrial level. Cell Microbiol. 2013;15(4):675–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eckart RA, Bisle S, Schulze-Luehrmann J, Wittmann I, Jantsch J, Schmid B, et al. Antiapoptotic activity of Coxiella burnetii effector protein AnkG is controlled by p32-dependent trafficking. Infect Immun. 2014;82(7):2763–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schäfer W, Eckart RA, Schmid B, Cagköylü H, Hof K, Muller YA, et al. Nuclear trafficking of the anti-apoptotic Coxiella burnetii effector protein AnkG requires binding to p32 and Importin-a1. Cell Microbiol. 2017;19(1):e12634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carey KL, Newton HJ, Lührmann A, Roy CR. The Coxiella burnetii Dot/Icm system delivers a unique repertoire of type IV effectors into host cells and is required for intracellular replication. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(5):e1002056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berens C, Bisle S, Klingenbeck L, Lührmann A. Applying an inducible expression system to study interference of bacterial virulence factors with intracellular signaling. J Vis Exp. 2015;(100):e52903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peña-Blanco A, García-Sáez AJ. Bax, Bak and beyond - mitochondrial performance in apoptosis. FEBS J. 2018;285(3):416–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Escudero M, Cid VJ, Molina M, Schulze-Luehrmann J, Lührmann A, Rodriguez-Escudero I. Studying Coxiella burnetii type IV substrates in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: focus on subcellular localization and protein aggregation. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0148032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bisle S, Klingenbeck L, Borges V, Sobotta K, Schulze-Luehrmann J, Menge C, et al. The inhibition of the apoptosis pathway by the Coxiella burnetii effector protein CaeA requires the EK repetition motif, but is independent of survivin. Virulence. 2016;7(4):400–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen I, Rayamajhi M, Miao EA. Programmed cell death as a defence against infection. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(3):151–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Man SM, Karki R, Kanneganti TD. Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis, inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes in infectious diseases. Immunol Rev. 2017;277(1):61–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vande Walle L, Lamkanfi M. Pyroptosis. Curr Biol. 2016;26(13):R568–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baumgarth N. B-1 cell heterogeneity and the regulation of natural and antigen-induced IgM production. Front Immunol. 2016;7:324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schoenlaub L, Cherla R, Zhang Y, Zhang G. Coxiella burnetii avirulent Nine Mile phase II induces caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in murine peritoneal B1a B cells. Infect Immun. 2016;84(12):3638–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham JG, MacDonald LJ, Hussain SK, Sharma UM, Kurten RC, Voth DE. Virulent Coxiella burnetii pathotypes productively infect primary human alveolar macrophages. Cell Microbiol. 2013;15(6):1012–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cunha LD, Ribeiro JM, Fernandes TD, Massis LM, Khoo CA, Moffatt JH, et al. Inhibition of inflammasome activation by Coxiella burnetii type IV secretion system effector IcaA. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green DR, Levine B. To be or not to be? How selective autophagy and cell death govern cell fate. Cell. 2014;157(1):65–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klionsky DJ. Autophagy: from phenomenology to molecular understanding in less than a decade. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(11):931–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine B, Yuan J. Autophagy in cell death: an innocent convict? J Clin Invest. 2005;115(10):2679–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galluzzi L, Green DR. Autophagy-independent functions of the autophagy machinery. Cell. 2019;177(7):1682–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y, Levine B. Autosis and autophagic cell death: the dark side of autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(3):367–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pattingre S, Tassa A, Qu X, Garuti R, Liang XH, Mizushima N, et al. Bcl-2 antiapoptotic proteins inhibit Beclin 1-dependent autophagy. Cell. 2005;122(6):927–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deretic V, Levine B. Autophagy, immunity, and microbial adaptations. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5(6):527–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gutierrez MG, Vázquez CL, Munafó DB, Zoppino FC, Berón W, Rabinovitch M, et al. Autophagy induction favours the generation and maturation of the Coxiella-replicative vacuoles. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7(7):981–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton HJ, Kohler LJ, McDonough JA, Temoche-Diaz M, Crabill E, Hartland EL, et al. A screen of Coxiella burnetii mutants reveals important roles for Dot/Icm effectors and host autophagy in vacuole biogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(7):e1004286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winchell CG, Graham JG, Kurten RC, Voth DE. Coxiella burnetii type IV secretion-dependent recruitment of macrophage autophagosomes. Infect Immun. 2014;82(6):2229–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vázquez CL, Colombo MI. Coxiella burnetii modulates Beclin 1 and Bcl-2, preventing host cell apoptosis to generate a persistent bacterial infection. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17(3):421–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohler LJ, Reed Sh C, Sarraf SA, Arteaga DD, Newton HJ, Roy CR. Effector protein Cig2 decreases host tolerance of infection by directing constitutive fusion of autophagosomes with the Coxiella-containing vacuole. mBio. 2016;7(4):e01127–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez E, Allombert J, Cantet F, Lakhani A, Yandrapalli N, Neyret A, et al. Coxiella burnetii effector CvpB modulates phosphoinositide metabolism for optimal vacuole development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(23):E3260–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez E, Cantet F, Fava L, Norville I, Bonazzi M. Identification of OmpA, a Coxiella burnetii protein involved in host cell invasion, by multi-phenotypic high-content screening. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(3):e1004013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Zhang G, Hendrix LR, Tesh VL, Samuel JE. Coxiella burnetii induces apoptosis during early stage infection via a caspase-independent pathway in human monocytic THP-1 cells. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(1):e30841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beare PA, Unsworth N, Andoh M, Voth DE, Omsland A, Gilk SD, et al. Comparative genomics reveal extensive transposon-mediated genomic plasticity and diversity among potential effector proteins within the genus Coxiella. Infect Immun. 2009;77(2):642–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spinelli JB, Haigis MC. The multifaceted contributions of mitochondria to cellular metabolism. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(7):745–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisner V, Picard M, Hajnóczky G. Mitochondrial dynamics in adaptive and maladaptive cellular stress responses. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(7):755–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lobet E, Letesson JJ, Arnould T. Mitochondria: a target for bacteria. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;94(3):173–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rudel T, Kepp O, Kozjak-Pavlovic V. Interactions between bacterial pathogens and mitochondrial cell death pathways. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(10):693–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber MM, Chen C, Rowin K, Mertens K, Galvan G, Zhi H, et al. Identification of Coxiella burnetii type IV secretion substrates required for intracellular replication and Coxiella-containing vacuole formation. J Bacteriol. 2013;195(17):3914–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fielden LF, Moffatt JH, Kang Y, Baker MJ, Khoo CA, Roy CR, et al. A farnesylated Coxiella burnetii effector forms a multimeric complex at the mitochondrial outer membrane during infection. Infect Immun. 2017;85(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winchell CG, Dragan AL, Brann KR, Onyilagha FI, Kurten RC, Voth DE. Coxiella burnetii subverts p62/Sequestosome 1 and activates Nrf2 signaling in human macrophages. Infect Immun. 2018;86(5):e00608–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Omsland A, Beare PA, Hill J, Cockrell DC, Howe D, Hansen B, et al. Isolation from animal tissue and genetic transformation of Coxiella burnetii are facilitated by an improved axenic growth medium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(11):3720–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandoz KM, Beare PA, Cockrell DC, Heinzen RA. Complementation of arginine auxotrophy for genetic transformation of Coxiella burnetii by use of a defined axenic medium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(10):3042–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beare PA, Howe D, Cockrell DC, Omsland A, Hansen B, Heinzen RA. Characterization of a Coxiella burnetii ftsZ mutant generated by Himar1 transposon mutagenesis. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(5):1369–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beare PA, Larson CL, Gilk SD, Heinzen RA. Two systems for targeted gene deletion in Coxiella burnetii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(13):4580–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sobotta K, Bonkowski K, Liebler-Tenorio E, Germon P, Rainard P, Hambruch N, et al. Permissiveness of bovine epithelial cells from lung, intestine, placenta and udder for infection with Coxiella burnetii. Vet Res (Faisalabad). 2017;48(1):23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vrentas CE, Schaut RG, Boggiatto PM, Olsen SC, Sutterwala FS, Moayeri M. Inflammasomes in livestock and wildlife: insights into the intersection of pathogens and natural host species. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2018;201:49–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ammerdorffer A, Kuley R, Dinkla A, Joosten LA, Toman R, Roest HJ, et al. Coxiella burnetii isolates originating from infected cattle induce a more pronounced proinflammatory cytokine response compared to isolates from infected goats and sheep. Pathog Dis. 2017;75(4):ftx040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

