Skip to main content
Missouri Medicine logoLink to Missouri Medicine
. 2019 Nov-Dec;116(6):472–475.

From Suffrage to the Senate: Expanding Inclusion in Women’s Rights to Achieve Women’s Health Equality

Frances Grimstad 1,
PMCID: PMC6913852  PMID: 31911723

Women’s rights movements have evolved significantly since the early 20th century. From the right to vote to basic reproductive rights, women acting together have caused major social change, which has improved women’s health equality (WHE).

While we applaud our progress to date, we also acknowledge that these efforts have focused on the priorities of women with socioeconomic privilege. And while all women have benefited from this progress, it is also clear that the women’s movement agenda must be broadened to include women who don’t come with all of the advantages.

Leading and speaking for the women’s movement has become a prominent issue. As the US populace continues to gain understanding of the colorful quilt that comprise all women’s experiences, we can no longer allow the movement’s focus to be solely that of privileged (and predominately white) women.

Women represent 51% of the US population, but we are not a homogenous group.1 In a recent article of Missouri Medicine, female genital mutilation (FGM) was brought up as a call to action for providers to recognize this injustice inflicted upon women, to support survivors and to prevent further FGM. Unfortunately, FGM is just one of many WHE issues. If our goal is sustainable WHE, we must consider the many health challenges confronting women who are not in the spotlight, and ensure those so afflicted are aggressively engaged in the leadership of a diverse and inclusive movement.

As providers we have a unique exposure to the challenges faced by our female patients. We see firsthand how health issues can limit their ability to lead full lives and how social inequalities directly impact health inequality.2 We have an opportunity to advocate for their voices. Our goal is to be their ally, not just their physician.

So how do we advocate for and alongside our marginalized female patients to achieve health equality? How do we actively work to overcome the diverse injustices faced by women infrequently represented on the covers of magazines, or the pulpits of change? Our current national women’s rights leaders have been effective advocates for protected maternity leave, equal pay and access to contraception – all of which are vitally important to WHE. But it’s important to remember the other disparities that affect large portions of the female populace.

While an exhaustive list of the unheard constituencies is beyond the scope of this article, there are several groups we can start to help today. How? By engaging with them in our own clinical spaces and in local public advocacy. We need to understand not only on the experiences they face, but also how we contribute to perpetuating these inequalities. Who are some of these groups?

Women of Color

Black women are three to four times more likely to die from a pregnancy related complication than white women.3 Even when controlling for economic status, infants born to black women in the middle class are more likely to die prior to their first birthday compared to infants born to white women in poverty with less than a high school education.4 While baby friendly hospitals and lactation suites at work advance our WHE agenda, we must also institute programs to address racial disparities and to support black women in accessing safe and affordable care. It also means supporting programs that help health care providers address their own unconscious bias so they can help build unbiased systems of care.

graphic file with name ms116_p0472f2.jpg

Black women are leaders of the civil rights movement.Source: Johnny Silvercloud, Flickr

Undocumented Women

WHE means ensuring that undocumented women have protected access to health care resources, regardless of documentation status (including signage and verbal support that documentation will not impact their access to care).5 Undocumented women are at increased risk of sexual assault and intimate partner violence, human trafficking, poverty, and denial of health care.6,7 Fear of deportation or discrimination further limits their desire to access existing resources. WHE means providing interpretations services and education for staff on cultural competency and trauma informed care, in order to help create welcoming, safe clinical spaces that include incorporating understanding of the journeys they have made.

Gender and Sexual Minorities

Included in these welcoming spaces should be an acknowledgement that people who are impacted by women’s rights and WHE, have diversity of gender and sexuality. This means that conversations about WHE should include discussions about disparities faced by all persons who are gender and sexual minorities including lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex persons. WHE means understanding that reproductive access is not just sought by persons who identify as women, but by transgender and intersex persons as well. 8,9 It means understanding as clinicians that not every woman has a uterus and not every person with a uterus identifies as a woman.10,11 WHE means removing provider bias regarding perceptions surrounding our patient’s gender identity, sexuality, or anatomy. It means advocating for inclusive insurance coverage, posting nondiscrimination policies and adapting our clinic aesthetic, and changing workflow and medical records to be inclusive of gender and sexual diversity patients.

Sex Workers

Another population to be considered is one that for generations has been pushed to the background of conversations: sex workers. Sex workers predominately identify as women, and are disproportionately the targets of violence, sexual assault, and murder.1214 Because of the US criminalization policies on sex work, these individuals are often reticent to work with the legal system. Consequently they are often reticent to disclose their employment status to health care personnel due to fear of mistreatment, including harassment, discrimination and refusal of services.15,16 WHE means providing sex workers with equal access to care, creating safe spaces for open conversations about sex, and supporting their voices in legislation targeted at their protection.15

Survivors of Violence

One cannot address sex workers without also speaking about survivors of violence. The “me too” movement, started by Tanara Burke, has educated the nation on the sweeping effect sexual violence has on our citizens. Despite this, the movement has evolved into a discussion highlighting the powerful and famous women who bravely have come forward. It has seemingly left in the shadows the women for which it was initially created: disenfranchised women, especially, women of color and women experiencing poverty. Discussing violence against women means acknowledging that the same populations disproportionately targeted by sexual violence are also at higher risk for violence in general, including intimate partner violence, gun violence, stalking and homicide.17,18 Providers should have resources ready to help patients exit unsafe situations, and utilize harm reduction and trauma informed models of care to decrease re-traumatization in the clinical setting.19

Women with Disabilities

Another critical constituency are women with mental and physical disabilities. WHE needs to be accessible to all persons of varying abilities. Women with disabilities need to be included in the conversation when creating health care spaces, workflows and competency trainings. Supporting this diverse part of our community means thinking about how individuals with sensory processing forms of autism might not feel supported in loud, crowded spaces, about how your clinic is laid out to be easily accessible in persons with ambulatory disabilities. WHE means not centering their health care solely on their disability (e.g. persons with disabilities reproductive needs have often been placed on the backburner by clinical providers).20 Women with disabilities are also at higher risk for abuse, including sexual abuse, in the home and in hospital care settings.21 Assumptions should not always be made that caretakers are safe guardians.

Women Who Are Incarcerated

Perhaps the least engaged women are those who are incarcerated. While only ten percent of persons currently incarcerated identify as female, over half of them have experienced sexual violence prior to incarceration, and one in five to one in six are sexually assaulted while incarcerated.22,23 Over two thirds are incarcerated for nonviolent offenses, and the majority identify as primary care takers for dependents. WHE means not only supporting decriminalization of many of these offenses but also ensuring women who are incarcerated are receiving appropriate health care and safe access to providers when they disclose prison abuse or assault.24 This includes supporting hiring practices for persons with a history of incarceration since women who were formerly incarcerated are also more likely to end up in poverty and unemployed after release.25

Women Who Are Poor

Overarching all of the above is the reality of poverty. Over half the individuals living in poverty are women. Roughly one in four black and Hispanic women live in poverty, compared to one in nine to ten white women. All of these rates are higher than men of the same race.26 Wages directly contribute to health quality as part of the social determinants of health.27,28 By supporting living wage policies, providers can directly engage in improving their patients’ quality of life. Financial stability contributes to higher rates of medication continuity, follow up visit compliance, and decreased rates of utilization of emergency rooms for primary health care.2931 As providers who believe in WHE, we need to recognize the challenges often linked to poverty, such as accommodating those who are late due to public transit limitations and offering social support resources for patients seeking stable housing, access to food and employment.

So What Can We Do?

Supporting WHE means not only listening to women’s voices, but also thinking about how to promote those voices into leadership roles. As providers, we can do so much. Show up to events sponsored by the groups listed above. Support organizations run by these women (Figure 1). Bring in speakers to hear their experiences as our patients, to help us improve our clinical care. A few simple steps but ones that demonstrate our understanding and commitment.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Examples of women-led local, state and national organizations addressing above disparities

In addition, think about who is presenting you with information on WHE, on the struggles of these constituents. I am a white, economically privileged female. I cannot speak for women whose life experiences are so different from my own. This piece is not a desire to usurp their voices. Rather it’s a desire to rally those providers with my background to be allies to these under-represented constituencies. To actively work to bring their voices to the forefront.

Nor is it the intention of this piece to beat up the leadership of today’s women’s movement. Their accomplishments resurrecting the movement have been critical to reenergizing discussions about key topics like WHE. But there is much work to be done. Broadening the movement’s leadership to include the constituencies discussed above will not be easy, and it will not happen quickly. Becoming active supporters of this process is a critical first step. One we are uniquely positioned to take.

Footnotes

Frances Grimstad, MD, is a Clinical Instructor at Boston Children’s Hospital in Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology for Harvard University. She was formerly a Fellow at university of Missouri Kansas City/Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri. Contact: fgrimstad@gmail.com

References

  • 1.US Census Bureau. Age and Sex Composition in the United States: 2010. [Accessed March 8, 2019]. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2010/demo/age-and-sex/2010-age-sex-composition.html. Published 2010.
  • 2.Pickett KE, Wilkinson RG. Income inequality and health: a causal review. Soc Sci Med. 2015;128:316–326. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2011–2013. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):366–373. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matthews TJ, MacDorman MF, Thoma ME. Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2013 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(9):1–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hacker K, Anies M, Folb BL, Zallman L. Barriers to health care for undocumented immigrants: a literature review. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015;8:175–183. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S70173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clawson H, Dutch N, Solomon A, Goldblatt Grace L. Human Trafficking Into and Within the United States: A Review of the Literature. US Department of Health And Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary For Planning and Education; 2016. [Accessed March 8, 2019]. https://aspe.hhs.gov/report/human-trafficking-and-within-united-states-review-literature. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Amnesty International. Invisible Victims: Migrants on the Move in Mexico. 2010. [Accessed March 9, 2019]. https://www.refworld.org/docid/4bd7e8de2.html.
  • 8.Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. Committee Opinion no. 512: health care for transgender individuals. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(6):1454–1458. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823ed1c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.ACOG Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 525: Health care for lesbians and bisexual women. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(5):1077–1080. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182564991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Committee on Adolescent Health Care. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 728: Müllerian Agenesis: Diagnosis, Management, And Treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(1):e35–e42. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee PA, Nordenström A, Houk CP, et al. Global Disorders of Sex Development Update since 2006: Perceptions, Approach and Care. Horm Res Paediatr. 2016;85(3):158–180. doi: 10.1159/000442975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mac J. Ted Talk: The laws that sex workers really want. [Accessed March 9, 2019]. Presented at the: January 2016. https://www.ted.com/talks/juno_mac_the_laws_that_sex_workers_really_want.
  • 13.Deering KN, Amin A, Shoveller J, et al. A Systematic Review of the Correlates of Violence Against Sex Workers. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(5):e42–e54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Potterat JJ, Brewer DD, Muth SQ, et al. Mortality in a long-term open cohort of prostitute women. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(8):778–785. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shannon K, Strathdee S, Goldenberg S, et al. Global Epidemiology of HIV Among Female Sex Workers: Influence of Structrual Determinants. Lancet. 2015;385(9962)(14):55–71. 60931–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.International Committee on the Rights of Sex Workers In Europe. Understanding Sex Workers’ Right To Health: Impact of Criminalization and Violence. International Committee on the Rights of Sex Workers In Europe; 2017. http://www.sexworkeurope.org/sites/default/files/userfiles/files/ICRSE_Briefing%20paper_HEALTH%20RIGHTS_October2017_A4_03.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Breiding M, Smith S, Basile K, Walters M, Chen J, Merrick M. Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization — National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. MMWR. 2014;63(8):1–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Petrosky E. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Homicides of Adult Women and the Role of Intimate Partner Violence — United States, 2003–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017:66. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6628a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.National Sexual Violence Center. Lifespan: Tools for Trauma-Informed Practice. National Sexual Violence Resource Center; [Accessed March 9, 2019]. https://www.nsvrc.org/lifespan-tools-trauma-informed-practice. Published 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nosek MA, Howland CA, Rintala DH, Young ME, Chanpong GF. Sexuality and Disability. 1. Vol. 19. Baylor College of Medicine; 2001. National Study of Women with Physical Disabilities: Final Report; pp. 5–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nosek M, Howland C. Abuse and Women With Disabilities. National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women; 1998. [Accessed March 9, 2019]. https://vawnet.org/sites/default/files/materials/files/2016-09/AR_Disab.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blackburn AG, Mullings JL, Marquart JW. Sexual Assault in Prison and Beyond: Toward an Understanding of Lifetime Sexual Assault Among Incarcerated Women. The Prison Journal. 2008 Sep; doi: 10.1177/0032885508322443. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Couloute L. Nowhere to Go: Homelessness among Formerly Incarcerated People. Prison Policy Initiative; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.ACOG Committee Opinion No. 511: Health care for pregnant and postpartum incarcerated women and adolescent females. [Accessed March 9, 2019]. - PubMed -NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22015908. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.Zakaria SM, Jaafar JR, Lazim NHM. Employment Issues Among Ex-Offenders: Difficulties in Securing Employment and Barriers of Employment. International Journal for Studies on Children, Women, Elderly and Disabled. 2018:5. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Current Population Survey. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of the Census; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020 Objectives: Social Determinants of Health. HealthyPeople.gov; [Accessed March 9, 2019]. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/social-determinants-of-health. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Roux D, VA. Invited Commentary: Beyond Individuals—Area Poverty and Health, or the Search for an Impactful Epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(11):1171–1173. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mishra SI, Gioia D, Childress S, Barnet B, Webster RL. Adherence to Medication Regimens among Low-Income Patients with Multiple Comorbid Chronic Conditions. Health Soc Work. 2011;36(4):249–258. doi: 10.1093/hsw/36.4.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pediatrics C on C. Poverty and Child Health in the United States. Pediatrics. 2016;137(4):e20160339. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhou R, Baicker K, Taubman S, Finkelstein A. The Uninsured Do Not Use The Emergency Department More-They Use Other Care Less. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36(12):2115–2122. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Missouri Medicine are provided here courtesy of Missouri State Medical Association

RESOURCES