Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2019 Nov 12;123(49):29708–29721. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08531

Stability and Exchange Processes in Ionic Liquid/Porphyrin Composite Films on Metal Surfaces

Matthias Lexow 1, Stephen Massicot 1, Florian Maier 1, Hans-Peter Steinrück 1,*
PMCID: PMC6913898  PMID: 31867088

Abstract

graphic file with name jp9b08531_0012.jpg

In light of increasing interest in the development of organic–organic multicomponent heterostructures on metals, this molecular-scale study investigates prototypical composite systems of ultrathin porphyrin and ionic liquid (IL) films on metallic supports under well-defined ultrahigh vacuum conditions. By means of angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, we investigated the adsorption, stability, and thermal exchange of the resulting films after sequential physical vapor deposition of the free-base porphyrin 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin, 2H-TPP, and the IL 1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [C8C1Im][PF6], on Ag(111) and Au(111). 2H-TPP shows two-dimensional growth of up to two closed molecular layers on Ag(111) and Au(111) and three-dimensional island growth for thicker films. IL films on top of a monolayer of 2H-TPP exhibit Stranski–Krastanov-like growth and are stable up to 385 K. The 2H-TPP layer leads to destabilization of the IL films, compared to the IL in direct contact with the bare metals, by inhibiting the specific adsorption of the ions on the metal surfaces. When the porphyrin is deposited on top of [C8C1Im][PF6] at low temperature, the 2H-TPP molecules adsorb on top of the IL film at first but replace the IL at the IL/metal interfaces upon heating above 240 K. This exchange process is most likely driven by the higher adsorption energy of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces, as compared to the IL. The behavior observed on Ag(111) and Au(111) is identical. The results are highly relevant for the stability of porphyrin/IL-based thin film catalyst systems and molecular devices, and more generally, stacked organic multilayer architectures.

1. Introduction

One key ingredient for the development of high-performance, multicomponent, molecular thin-film devices is a molecular-level understanding of the adsorption and assembly of organic constituents on the solid substrate. Desired surface and interface arrangements and properties can only be achieved by deliberate choice of the involved molecular building blocks and control of the interplay between molecule–substrate and intermolecular interactions.1−10

Owing to their vital role in numerous biological catalytic reactions and transport processes,11,12 porphyrins are of particular interest for technical applications.6,7,9,13−17 They offer great functional diversity by variation of the substituents at the periphery of the tetrapyrrole core of the molecule. Knowledge and control of the formation and structure of self-assembled porphyrin adlayers on the surface of solid supports are essential for the synthesis of custom-tailored environments and catalysts.5,8,9,13,14,18 The preparation of catalytically active porphyrin-functionalized metal surfaces can be achieved by physical vapor deposition (PVD) in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV).5,9,19 One particularly popular and well-studied representative is 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin (2H-TPP, see Figure 1a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Molecular structures and van der Waals models of (a) 2H-TPP and (b) [C8C1Im][PF6].

With reference to the rapidly growing interest in the development of organic–organic multicomponent heterostructures on metals,10,20−28 recent studies on porphyrins and related aromatic molecules highlight the importance of the strength of the organic–metal interaction and how it relates to the stability and arrangement of stacked multilayer architectures within organic bilayer structures on metals.10,27,28

Wang et al. studied the deposition of copper-phthalocyanine (Cu-Pc) onto monolayers of 6,13-pentacenequinone (P2O) or 5,7,12,14-pentacenetetrone (P4O) on Ag(111) at room temperature (RT). They found that P2O is exchanged by Cu-Pc on the Ag(111) surface, whereas for P4O, no exchange occurs, that is, Cu-Pc remains on top of the P4O layer.27

Gallego et al.29 deposited a fullerene derivative (phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester, PCBM) onto a layer of a TTF derivative (2-[9-(1,3-dithiol-2-ylidene)anthracen-10(9H)-ylidene]-1,3-dithiole, exTTF) on Au(111). PCBM was found to replace a large fraction of the exTTF molecules from the metal surface to the outer surface because of preferential interaction with the gold substrate. This exchange does not occur, however, if the thickness of the exTTF layer is more than one monolayer.29

Deimel et al.30 studied the deposition of ruthenium-tetraphenylporphyrin [Ru(CO)TPP] and iron-phthalocyanine (Fe-Pc) on a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of 4-fluorothiophenol (4-FTP) on Ag(111) at 90 K. Upon heating the resulting Ru(CO)TPP/4-FTP/Ag(111) and Fe-Pc/4-FTP/Ag(111) systems, they observed by temperature-programmed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) that the Ru(CO)TPP and Fe-Pc molecules slip under the SAM at temperatures of 175 and 235 K, respectively. On the basis of earlier work,20,31−33 they concluded that the interaction of Fe-Pc with the silver substrate is comparatively stronger.30

Interestingly, various other porphyrins deposited onto SAMs on Au, that is, 2H-TPP/CnH2n+1SH (with 8–16 C atoms; SAM thickness: 1.25–2.13 nm),33 Co-TPP on 4-pyridinethiolate,31 and 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethylporphinatozinc (Zn-OEP) on 4-pyridinethiolate,32 appeared to be stable at RT. In the latter two cases, the N atom of 4-pyridinethiolate binds to the respective central metal atom of Co-TPP and Zn-OEP.31,32

Thussing and Jakob28 also observed temperature-dependent exchange processes while heating stacked layers of Cu-Pc and 3,4,9,10-perylene-tetracarboxylic-dianhydride (PTCDA) on Ag(111) deposited at 80 K. Notably, the thermal stability of the bilayer changes drastically if the order of the stack is reversed, which is related to the simultaneous desorption of molecules.28 Similar exchange and desorption phenomena were observed for bilayers of titanyl-phthalocyanine and PTCDA on Ag(111).10

The aim of our study now is to study the interaction of adsorbed porphyrin monolayers with ionic liquids (ILs) and the stability of sequentially deposited composite layers under well-defined UHV conditions. As far as we are aware of, this is the first investigation of this kind. ILs are salts with a melting point typically below 100 °C, which combine extremely low vapor pressures with a large number of tunable chemical and physicochemical properties, depending on the nature of their cation/anion combination. In analogy to the above-mentioned examples, molecular exchange and preferential adsorption were also observed after sequential deposition of two different ILs on Ag(111).34,35 In particular, the selective replacement of anions and cations at the metal interface was found. After deposition below 90 K, the exchange occurs during heating at around 190 K. This temperature agrees well with the bulk glass transition temperature of the postdeposited IL.34,35

Thin films of ILs are of high relevance for a variety of applications. Deposited on high surface area solid supports, they are the key ingredient to effective SCILL36 (solid catalyst with IL layer) and SILP37−39 (supported IL phase) catalysts.36−38,40−53 Furthermore, they also show an increasing potential for widespread use, for example, in sensors,48,54−57 lubrication,58−60 separation,39,48,57,61−63 electrochemistry,48,57,64−75 and dye-sensitized solar cell76,77 technologies. For these thin IL film applications, the function, performance, and stability of the system are strongly determined by the interface properties.53,78−83 Understanding in detail the interaction of the IL with the support is of high importance. The specifics of the interaction determine how the ions arrange at the interface and whether the IL film grows in the form of uniform layers or three-dimensional (3D) islands.34,53,83−90

For the present study, we choose the free-base porphyrin 2H-TPP (Figure 1a) and the IL [C8C1Im][PF6] (Figure 1b) as prototypical representatives of porphyrin and IL species, respectively. These appear as promising candidates for forming layered IL/porphyrin films because 2H-TPP does not dissolve in [C8C1Im][PF6], as has been checked by dissolution experiments. Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces serve as supports. In addition to the excellent suitability as model systems, Ag and Au could be relevant for future applications in SCILL89 in the form of Au/Ag alloys where Ag activates molecular oxygen in oxygen-assisted coupling reactions.91,92 Ag(111) and Au(111) show low reactivity toward 2H-TPP and [C8C1Im][PF6], and no changes in the atomic structure of these surfaces were reported upon deposition of porphyrins or ILs.5,89,93 On the basis of earlier detailed studies of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111)34,35 and of 2H-TPP on Ag(111)94−96 and Au(111),33,96,97 our study aims for a detailed analysis of the interaction of porphyrins with ILs at support interfaces and sets the ground for potential future studies of reactions (e.g., metalation)94,95,98 of porphyrins at IL/solid interfaces. The experiments were performed using angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS) with Al Kα radiation at emission angles of 0° and 80°. The information depth (ID) is 7–9 nm at 0° (depending on the kinetic energy) and only 1–1.5 nm at 80°. Thus, in the latter case, the experiment is about 6 times more surface sensitive, and mainly the topmost surface layer is probed (for details see the Experimental Section).

2. Experimental Section

[C8C1Im][PF6] was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (purity >95%), and 2H-TPP was purchased from Porphyrin Systems (purity 98%). Both chemicals were carefully degassed in UHV at an elevated temperature prior to the deposition experiments. [C8C1Im][PF6] and 2H-TPP were deposited via PVD19,34,35,89,99 using two separate effusion cells34 at cell temperatures of around 443 and 590 K, respectively. The flux was checked with a quartz crystal microbalance before and after deposition. With the exception of dialkylimidazolium halides,100,101 most other alkylimidazolium ILs evaporate intact in the form of neutral ion pairs.34,35,85,89,99,101−110

Round Ag(111) and Au(111) single crystals with diameters of 15 mm were purchased from MaTeck (purity 99.999%, polished with an alignment better than 0.1° to the (111) plane). The crystals were prepared by Ar+ sputtering (600 V, 8 μA, 30 min) followed by annealing (800 K, 10 min). The temperature of the single crystals was measured using type K thermocouples put into a 0.5 mm wide pinhole of the crystal with an absolute accuracy of ±20 K and a reproducibility of ±2 K.

The UHV system ARXPS has been described previously.89 In short, the ARXP spectra were acquired using a nonmonochromated Al Kα X-ray source (SPECS XR 50, 1486.6 eV, 240 W) and a hemispherical electron analyzer (VG SCIENTA R3000). A pass energy of 100 eV was applied for all spectra yielding an overall energy resolution of about 0.9 eV.89 The spectra were quantitatively evaluated in CasaXPS V2.3.16Dev6. We subtracted Shirley backgrounds111 for Ag 3d and Au 4f core levels. Because of overlapping plasmon and shake-up satellites and the inelastically scattered electrons of the Ag 3d lines,112−115 an additional background was subtracted in the N 1s region on Ag(111); for further details, see ref (89). In all other cases (N 1s on Au(111) and F 1s and C 1s spectra on both substrates), linear backgrounds were subtracted. The IL spectra were fitted with a Voigt profile (30% Lorentzian contribution). For fitting of the IL C 1s peaks, we applied a constraint of fwhm(Chetero) = 1.11 × fwhm(Calkyl).34,35,89,105 All binding energies (BEs) were referenced to the Fermi edge, yielding 368.2 eV for the Ag 3d5/2 line and 83.85 eV for Au 4f7/2. Temperature-programmed XPS was performed at a heating rate of 2 K/min.

The coverage of 2H-TPP and [C8C1Im][PF6] on the metal surfaces was characterized by measuring the attenuation of the substrate signal (Ag 3d, Au 4f) at an emission angle of ϑ = 0°. The interface composition was determined by comparing the relative intensities from the quantitative analysis of the XP spectra in 0° and 80° emission. When using Al Kα radiation, the ID at normal emission ϑ = 0° is 7–9 nm (depending on the kinetic energy). At ϑ = 80°, ID is only 1–1.5 nm, which means that only the topmost surface layers are probed. ID is defined as 3 times the inelastic mean free path, λ, of an electron at a given kinetic energy.34 For Ag 3d electrons with a kinetic energy around 1.1 keV, λ is 2.5 nm in IL films,34,89 and for Au 4f electrons (1.4 keV), it is 3.0 nm.87,105,116,117 On the basis of the similarities in chemical composition and density, similar λ values for 2H-TPP are assumed.

For homogeneous two-dimensional (2D) growth, the substrate signal at the angle ϑ decreases from its intensity I0 for the clean surface to a value Id for a film with thickness d according to34,89,105

2. 1

Note that for ideal layer-by-layer growth (i.e., each individual layer is completed before a new layer starts to grow on top), the substrate signals should decrease in a section-wise linear fashion for each layer.85,105,118 The statistics of our data are, however, insufficient to clearly resolve the slope changes between adjacent straight sections. Similar to previous studies,34,35,85,87,89,119,120 we determined information on the growth behavior by first estimating the mean film thickness d for each deposition experiment from the Id/I0 ratios in the bulk-sensitive geometry at ϑ = 0° according to eq 1. Using this thickness, we then calculated the value expected for 2D growth in the surface-sensitive geometry at 80°, again using eq 1. Agreement between the experimental data at 80° and the calculation for 80° indicates 2D growth, whereas Id/I0(80°) ratios above the calculated curve indicate a 3D morphology of the IL film; similar behavior has been described for several other systems.34,35,85,87,89,119,120

IL coverage is given in ML, where 1 ML is defined as a closed double layer of ions irrespective of their relative arrangement.34,35,89,99,107 The monolayer height is calculated as the cubic root of the molecular volume Vm based on mass density ρ values from the literature. Using the literature value for Vm,121hML of [C8C1Im][PF6] was calculated to be 0.77 nm.34,35

In this work, the porphyrin coverage is given in the number (multiples) of complete layers. This means, one monolayer corresponds to one complete layer with all porphyrin molecules in direct contact with the metal surface. In some previous publications, the porphyrin coverage in “ML” was defined as the number of porphyrin molecules per metal atom of the substrate. For 2H-TPP on Ag(111), one monolayer corresponds by this definition to a coverage of 0.037 ML.94 To avoid any confusion, the unit “ML” will not be used to denote porphyrin coverages in this work. Unless indicated in the text otherwise, monolayer coverage of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) and Au(111) was achieved by heating to 500 K (above the multilayer desorption temperature)122 after the deposition of multilayers of porphyrin on the metal crystal. From the attenuation of the substrate XPS signal in 0° emission, the height of the 2H-TPP monolayer was calculated to be 0.34 nm using λ = 2.5 nm on Ag(111) and λ = 3.0 nm on Au(111), as stated above. Upon heating above 525 K, signs of dehydrogenation at the phenyl groups were reported for 2H-TPP molecules in contact with the Ag(111) surface.123 In this work, the porphyrin layers were only heated to 500 K to avoid dehydrogenation at the molecule’s periphery. XPS analysis did not give any indication of decomposition upon heating up to 500 K.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Growth and Desorption of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) and Au(111)

As a first step, we characterize the growth behavior of 2H-TPP on the two different substrates. For coverages of up to one closed layer of 2H-TPP, that is, for molecules in direct contact with the substrate, the behavior is well-studied on Ag(111)94−96 and Au(111).33,96,97 In contrast, information on the multilayer structure of porphyrins on metal substrates is scarce.26,124−129 For applications in organic electronic devices, this multilayer structure is of utmost importance127,130 because the molecular arrangement and orientation define parameters such as charge-carrier mobility and device efficiency.10,28,127,131

To investigate the growth of 2H-TPP from sub-monolayer to multilayer coverages, we deposited increasing amounts of 2H-TPP onto the two substrates. Figure 2 shows the attenuation of the ARXPS signal intensity (at 0° and 80°) of the supporting metals (Ag 3d and Au 4f) as a function of porphyrin coverage on Ag(111) and Au(111), respectively, for deposition at RT (between 295 and 315 K) and at low temperature (LT, between 80 and 85 K). Overall, we observe very similar behavior on the two surfaces and at both temperatures. In each case, the data for 80° (open symbols) exactly follows the prediction for 2D growth (dashed lines; see the Experimental Section for details on the calculation) up to one monolayer, that is, an average thickness of ∼0.34 nm. This behavior indicates the formation of a homogeneous closed layer of flat-lying porphyrin molecules, in line with the literature. Self-assembly of the porphyrin molecules into extended, ordered 2D networks on Ag(111) and Au(111) has been reported at RT and below 100 K.33,93,95−97,132,133 Isolated 2H-TPP molecules are considered highly mobile on both metal surfaces at 300 K,96 and the formation of ordered 2D networks is driven by the relatively strong molecule–molecule interaction.5,33,93,96,97,122,123,132−139

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Attenuation of the (a) Ag 3d and (b) Au 4f signals in 0° (closed symbols) and 80° (open symbols) emission as a function of the nominal porphyrin film thickness on Ag(111) and Au(111), respectively. Porphyrin deposition was performed at RT (295–315 K, red) and at LT (80–85 K, blue). Ideal curves for 2D growth were calculated using values for λ of 2.5 nm for Ag 3d electrons and 3.0 nm for Au 4f electrons. For more details, see the Experimental Section.

The good agreement between the substrate signal intensity and the calculation for 2D growth continues until a coverage of approximately two monolayers (∼0.68 nm) is reached. This behavior suggests that upon increasing the coverage, a second closed layer is formed on top of the first 2H-TPP layer. For higher coverages, the 80° data points in Figure 2 fall above the prediction for 2D growth (dashed lines), which is indicative of 3D island growth. This growth behavior is denoted as Stranski–Krastanov-like growth.140 Pronounced 3D growth on top of two closed molecular layers was also observed for Cu-Pc on Cu(111) at RT129 and for other large π-conjugated molecules on Ag(111) and Au(111).141−144 While the initial 2D adlayers benefit from the strong adsorption of the molecules to the metal surface, the formation of relaxed 3D crystallites on top of the initial adlayers could be thermodynamically favored because it lowers the contact area to the strained layers below.142 From crystallography, tetragonal145 and triclinic146 structures were reported for 2H-TPP. Within the porphyrin crystals, the macrocycle is less twisted than in the surface-confined 2H-TPP monolayer on Ag(111) and Au(111); furthermore, in the crystal, stacking of the aromatic systems dominates the intermolecular interactions,145,146 whereas in the 2H-TPP monolayer on Ag(111) and Au(111), T-type interactions determine the structure.97,133,134,136 This results not only in different tilt angles of the phenyl legs with respect to the macrocycle but generally very different molecular arrangements.127

Comparing the data at RT (red) to that at LT (blue) in Figure 2, we note that the variation of the support temperature between 80 and 315 K does not affect the growth behavior of 2H-TPP on both surfaces in the first two layers. In a previous study, Rojas et al.132 reported for 2H-TPP on Ag(111) at 58 K the nucleation of a second layer of porphyrin molecules on top of initial adislands before the completion of the first layer. While terrace diffusion on Ag(111) was reported to occur at temperatures as low as 58 K, the porphyrin islands of double-layer height appeared to be stabilized by limited diffusion of the molecules across the island boundaries. Upon heating above 100 K, the second-layer porphyrin molecules crossed the island boundaries and attached to the periphery of the first-layer islands.132 Our results indicate that immediately after impact on the surface at 80–85 K, the kinetic energy of the 2H-TPP molecules is large enough to enable diffusion across the island boundaries, allowing for the formation of flat 2D islands for coverages of up to two closed porphyrin layers on Ag(111) and Au(111).

Next, we address the thermal stability of 2H-TPP multilayers on Ag(111) and Au(111). Figure 3 shows the thermal evolution of the porphyrin C 1s and the corresponding metal substrate signals at 0° emission during heating of 2H-TPP multilayer films up to 540 K. The behavior on both surfaces is very similar. The signals remain constant until 440 K, where the C 1s intensity starts to decrease, and simultaneously the Ag 3d and Au 4f intensities increase. This behavior is attributed to desorption of the 2H-TPP multilayers, which is completed at around 480 K; above this temperature, no further changes are observed. From a Leading-Edge-like analysis107,147 of the data, we obtain an activation energy EA of 193 kJ/mol (±22 kJ/mol) for multilayer desorption of 2H-TPP. From the residual C 1s intensity and the remaining attenuation of the Ag 3d and Au 4f substrate signals, we conclude that one closed monolayer of intact 2H-TPP remains present after multilayer desorption.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

C 1s peak intensity (purple) and Ag 3d and Au 4f intensities (gray), as determined from temperature-programmed XPS in 0° emission upon heating three layers of 2H-TPP deposited on (a) Ag(111) and (b) Au(111) at RT. Heating rate: 2 K/min.

Our observations are in agreement with a previous temperature-programmed desorption study of 2H-TPP on Ag(111),122 where the multilayers were found to desorb below 490 K. Furthermore, previous studies demonstrated—in contrast to earlier assumptions9,122,123,127—partial dehydrogenation of 2H-TPP monolayers on Ag(111) above 525 K.9,122,123 While the exact onset of decomposition is still not clear and no detailed study on Au(111) is available, we refrained from heating above 500 K during the preparation of a monolayer coverage of 2H-TPP by multilayer desorption to avoid any undesired reactions of the 2H-TPP molecules. Di Santo et al. reported a shift to lower BE of the N 1s and C 1s signals and a change in the C 1s peak shape after heating to 550 K in case of Ag(111); both effects were attributed to a change in the orientation of the phenyl groups of the 2H-TPP molecule relative to the metal surface upon dehydrogenation.123 In the present study, the spectra of monolayer 2H-TPP films showed no difference after heating to 500 K compared to films of similar thickness prepared by direct deposition.

3.2. Growth and Desorption of [C8C1Im][PF6] on 2H-TPP-Covered Ag(111) and Au(111)

To study the interaction between the IL [C8C1Im][PF6] and the neutral 2H-TPP molecule, we deposited [C8C1Im][PF6] onto Ag(111) and Au(111) covered with one closed monolayer of 2H-TPP (prepared by multilayer desorption at 480 K, see previous section). For comparison, we performed the same experiments also on bare surfaces. In each case, the IL growth behavior was monitored via the attenuation of the metal signals, Id/I0, as a function of the IL film thickness; note that for the 2H-TPP-precovered surface, I0 is smaller than for the bare surface because of the attenuation by the preadsorbed porphyrin layer. Figure 4 shows the corresponding data for IL deposition at RT (green and red symbols) and at LT (blue; only for bare metal surfaces); the data for [C8C1Im][PF6] on bare Ag(111) was in part already published.34 For ILs, the coverage of 1 ML is defined as one layer ion pairs vertically arranged on top of each other,34,35,85,89,99,105,120 with a height 0.77 nm for [C8C1Im][PF6];34,35 thus, one closed layer of anions and cations adsorbed next to each other corresponds to 0.5 ML (for details, see the Experimental Section).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Attenuation of the (a) Ag 3d and (b) Au 4f signals in 0° (closed) and 80° (open) emission as a function of the nominal [C8C1Im][PF6] film thickness on Ag(111) and Au(111), respectively. The IL films were deposited onto the 2H-TPP-precovered (green) and pristine substrates at RT (295–315 K, red) and at LT (80–85 K, blue). RT data for [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) was adapted in part from ref (34). Ideal curves for 2D growth were calculated using values for λ of 2.5 nm for Ag 3d electrons and 3.0 nm for Au 4f electrons. For more details, see the Experimental Section.

Up to a coverage of 0.5 ML [C8C1Im][PF6] (0.38 nm), the 80° data for both 2H-TPP-precovered surfaces in Figure 4 (open green symbols) display the characteristics of 2D growth, that is, they follow the dashed lines. This behavior indicates the formation of a homogeneous IL wetting layer (WL) with anions and cations adsorbed next to each other on top of the 2H-TPP monolayer. The formation of a WL is also observed for [C8C1Im][PF6] on bare metal surfaces (open red symbols). At IL film thicknesses above 0.5 ML, that is, starting with the second molecular IL layer, we systematically find a lower attenuation (larger intensity) in the 80° data than predicted for ideal 2D growth (dashed line). This deviation appears to be larger on the 2H-TPP-covered metals (green) than on the bare metals (red, blue) and indicates a more pronounced 3D character of the IL islands. The growth behavior of [C8C1Im][PF6] on the bare Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces is very similar to each other and does not appear to be influenced by a variation of the support temperature between 80 and 315 K. For details on the molecular orientation for varying thicknesses of [C8C1Im][PF6] films on bare Ag(111) and Au(111) at RT, see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information.

Figure 5 shows the F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s spectra at 80° emission after deposition of 1.3 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on top of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) at RT. Notably, measurements at 80° (grazing emission) probe only the topmost surface layers. With an ID of only 1–1.5 nm, the resulting XP spectra are very sensitive to changes in the composition of the IL/vacuum interface of the sample, for example, by reorientation, selective enrichment, or preferential accumulation of one or more components.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

XP spectra of F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s core levels at 80° emission for (I) the clean Ag(111) surface, (II) a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Ag(111), (III) after deposition of 1.3 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on the 2H-TPP monolayer at RT, and (IV) after heating the film to 500 K. 2H-TPP-related signals are shown in purple color, and IL-related signals are colored according to the vdW models in Figure 1.

The C 1s spectrum of the 2H-TPP monolayer in Figure 5II displays one dominating peak at 284.9 eV (violet), which corresponds to the 44 aromatic C atoms in the porphyrin molecule,123 along with two shake-up satellites at 288.6 and 291.6 eV which are common for molecules with extended conjugated π systems.94,148 In the N 1s region, we find two peaks (violet), one at 400.2 eV for the two pyrrolic (aminic, N–H) N atoms and one at 398.2 eV for the two iminic N atoms of the free-base porphyrin molecule.98,149 The ratio of Niminic/Npyrrolic of 0.9 at 80° emission is somewhat smaller than the nominal ratio of 1.0. This difference is attributed to the so-called saddle-shape conformation of 2H-TPP on the Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces:5,93,96,97,135 In this twisted conformation, the pyrrolic N–H moieties point toward the vacuum side and the iminic N atoms toward the metal surface. At 80° emission angle, this conformation could lead to an enhanced signal for the former and an attenuated signal for the latter because of inelastic scattering of the photoelectrons.

The deposition of 1.3 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on top of the porphyrin monolayer on Ag(111), Figure 5III, results in two new contributions in the C 1s region at 287.5 (gray) and 285.8 eV (yellow) because of the five Chetero atoms (i.e., carbon bound to nitrogen in the ring) and the seven Calkyl atoms (i.e., carbon bound to carbon and hydrogen in the chain) of the imidazolium cation. The additional N 1s peak at 402.6 eV (gray) corresponds to the two N atoms of the cation, and the F 1s peak at 687.3 eV (blue) corresponds to the six F atoms of the [PF6]− anion. The intensities of the porphyrin C 1s and N 1s signals strongly decrease upon IL deposition; the BEs of the IL-related peaks correspond very well to those of neat [C8C1Im][PF6] films of thickness similar to that of the porphyrin/IL composite film described here. We therefore conclude that the IL film covers the porphyrin layer, that is, the porphyrin molecules remain at the Ag(111) interface with the IL on top.

The deposition of an additional monolayer equivalent of 2H-TPP on top of an IL-covered 2H-TPP monolayer on Ag(111) at RT (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information) leads to the intercalation of the second 2H-TPP layer between the IL and the first 2H-TPP layer such that the IL film remains at the vacuum interface with a 2H-TPP double layer below.

For the Au(111) surface, we obtain very similar results, as is evident from Figure 6, where the F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s spectra at 80° are depicted for 1.1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] deposited on top of a single layer of 2H-TPP on Au(111) at RT. After deposition of 2H-TPP (Figure 6II), we observe the expected porphyrin-related contributions. Upon successive deposition of the IL on top of the porphyrin monolayer (Figure 6III), we note the same additional IL-related contributions as on Ag(111). Again, similar to the situation above, the porphyrin signals decrease considerably, which shows that the IL film covers the porphyrin layer below while the porphyrin molecules remain on the Au(111) surface. The consistent observation of the porphyrin layer remaining at the substrate interface for both metals rules out intercalation of the IL between the porphyrin layer and the metal substrate under the applied experimental conditions. This contrasts the situation, for example, ILs on graphene, where spontaneous intercalation was observed at RT.150

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

XP spectra of F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s core levels at 80° emission for (I) the clean Au(111) surface, (II) a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Au(111), (III) after deposition of 1.1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on the 2H-TPP monolayer at RT, and (IV) after heating the film to 500 K (color coding as in Figure 5).

In the next step, we studied the thermal stability of the composite films of IL on the porphyrin-covered metals by heating to 500 K. The corresponding results for the Ag(111) surface are shown in Figure 5IV. After heating, the XPS signals related to [C8C1Im][PF6] (yellow, gray, and blue) disappear entirely, and the initial intensities of the porphyrin peaks in the C 1s and N 1s regions (violet) are restored. This can be explained by complete desorption of [C8C1Im][PF6] from the surface, uncovering the intact porphyrin monolayer below the IL layer without any signs of decomposition.

For the IL film on the 2H-TPP-covered Au(111), we also observe the complete removal of the anion-related F 1s signal after heating to 500 K on Au(111), as is evident from Figure 6IV. However, in contrast to Ag(111), we note a slight shift of the porphyrin-related signals to higher BE and residual peaks, which seem to be related to the IL cation. The shift of the 2H-TPP-related N 1s and C 1s signals to higher BE after desorption could be a sign of dehydrogenation at the periphery of the 2H-TPP molecules.123 The residuals in the N 1s and C 1s regions could be interpreted as a result of decomposition of the IL in such a way that the [PF6]− anions are fully gone from the surface and fragments of the cation—perhaps as a result of carbene formation—remain. Similar residuals in the N 1s and C 1s spectra are also observed in slightly larger amounts upon desorption of this IL from bare Au(111), that is, in the absence of 2H-TPP (see Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). These observations indicate that the decomposition occurs independently of the porphyrin interlayer. We carefully checked for potential influence of X-ray beam damage; but neither lowering the X-ray exposure from typically over 3 h for the whole heating series to less than 10 min before recording the final spectra after heating to 500 K nor varying the amount of IL deposited leads to notable changes in the amount of residuals formed upon desorption of the IL from bare and 2H-TPP-covered Au(111).

Interestingly, complete desorption of [C8C1Im][PF6] with no signs of thermal decomposition has been observed for bare and 2H-TPP-covered Ag(111). Note that this is not generally the case on Ag(111), as thermal decomposition has been reported for an imidazolium-based IL with a partially fluorinated alkyl chain.35

In the following, we take a closer look at the desorption processes on the bare and the 2H-TPP-covered Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces. Figure 7 shows the thermal evolution of the IL FPF6 signals (blue and orange) and the substrate signals (gray) from in situ temperature-programmed XPS at 0° emission upon heating with a constant heating rate of 2 K/min. On the bare metal surfaces (Figure 7a), the anion-related FPF6 intensity stays nearly unchanged until about 385 K before it decreases to zero in two steps. The intensity of the respective Ag 3d and Au 4f signals increases accordingly. The first step with an inflection point at 405 K is attributed to the desorption of the IL multilayers, with a single WL of [C8C1Im][PF6] remaining on the surface.34,35 From a Leading-Edge-like analysis107,147 of the data, we obtain an activation energy EA of 167 kJ/mol (±18 kJ/mol) for multilayer desorption of [C8C1Im][PF6], which is roughly in agreement with the value of 143 kJ/mol (±4 kJ/mol) published for [C8C1Im][PF6] desorption from macroscopic IL samples.102 The second step-wise decrease in the intensity of the FPF6 signal is in each case attributed to desorption of the remaining IL WL. Comparing the two graphs for the bare Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces in Figure 7a, we observe desorption of the IL WL at a similar desorption temperature of about 445 K on both supports.34,35

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Thermal evolution of F 1s, Ag 3d, and Au 4f signal intensities at 0° emission from temperature-programmed XPS upon heating (a) films of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) and Au(111) and (b) films of [C8C1Im][PF6] on a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) and Au(111). The films were heated from RT to 500 K with a heating rate of 2 K/min.

The similar desorption temperature of the IL WL from bare Ag(111) and bare Au(111) indicates a similar adsorption energy of [C8C1Im][PF6] on both substrates. This behavior is surprising at first sight as Ag surfaces are generally considered more reactive than Au, an expectation that is based on the classic d-band center model, which was established around small molecules on metal surfaces.8 On the other hand, in light of the ionic nature of [C8C1Im][PF6] and the larger polarizability of Au compared to Ag,8 one could expect a larger image dipole, yielding a larger adsorption energy on Au(111). Interestingly, very similar adsorption energies were also reported for structurally simpler aromatic molecules such as benzene on Ag(111) and Au(111).8,151,152 There, it was argued that the sensitivity of many-body contributions to the planar atomic density of face-centered cubic metals combined with the balance between Pauli repulsion and van der Waals forces between molecules and surface atoms can lead to very similar adsorption energies.8 Concerning the ILs studied here, we again note that on Au(111), the desorption of the IL WL from Au(111) goes along with a certain degree of decomposition (see above), which could also have an influence on the desorption behavior.

Next, we discuss the IL desorption on the 2H-TPP-covered surfaces in Figure 7b. The multilayer desorption of [C8C1Im][PF6] is found to be identical to that on the bare surfaces. Interestingly, we do not observe the separate desorption of the WL at higher temperatures like on the bare surfaces. Instead, the entire IL film desorbs until 425 K, that is, at the same temperature as the multilayer. This desorption temperature of 405 K is about 40 K lower than the IL WL desorption temperature of 445 K on bare Ag(111) and Au(111) in Figure 7a. From this observation, we conclude that the interaction of [C8C1Im][PF6] with the 2H-TPP-covered surface is different from that with the bare metal surfaces. The 2H-TPP layer acts as a spacer between [C8C1Im][PF6] and the metals. It effectively inhibits the specific interaction of the IL WL with the metal, which leads to a pseudo-multilayer behavior of the IL WL on 2H-TPP. At this point, we need to mention that on the 2H-TPP-covered Ag(111) surface, the IL appears sensitive to the X-ray exposure accumulated prior to desorption. After exposing the system for more than 90 min, we observe that a fraction of the F 1s signal can remain up to 480 K (not shown), which we attribute to beam damage. Thus, the experiments had to be performed with minimum exposure to X-rays.

After the complete desorption of the IL, at 500 K, the intact porphyrin layer is retained on Ag(111) (compare Figure 5IV to 5II), as already mentioned above. On Au(111), the residual cation-related XPS signals at 500 K on Au(111) (compare Figure 6IV to 6II) hint at a lower stability of the [C8C1Im][PF6] WL on 2H-TPP-covered Au(111) as a result of decomposition. As already mentioned above, also the desorption of the IL from bare Au(111) shows similar residuals in C 1s and N 1s, indicating that there is no direct influence of the 2H-TPP layer on the decomposition of the IL.

3.3. Deposition at LT and Exchange of [C8C1Im][PF6] by 2H-TPP at the IL/Metal Interface

To further extend our understanding of the interaction of [C8C1Im][PF6] and 2H-TPP at the interfaces of Ag(111) and Au(111), the order of the deposition process was reversed. We first deposited 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at LT (80–84 K), followed by a single layer of 2H-TPP directly on top of the IL layer, again at LT. This composite film was subsequently heated to RT. XP spectra were measured after each preparation step.

Figure 8 shows the F 1s, C 1s, and N 1s spectra at 80° for this deposition experiment on Ag(111) at 84 K. Figure 9 provides a scheme of the film structure at different stages of this experiment. The F 1s spectrum in Figure 8II after deposition of the [C8C1Im][PF6] film (1 ML) shows the expected FPF6 peak of the [PF6]− anions. In the C 1s spectrum, we find the Chetero and Calkyl peaks for the two carbon species in the [C8C1Im]+ cation with a ratio of Chetero/Calkyl of 0.64 in 80°, which is very close to the nominal ratio of 0.71 (=5:7). As reported earlier,34,35 this contrasts the behavior at RT34,35,89,105 (see also Figure S1 in the Supporting Information) because for deposition at temperatures around 85 K, the alkyl chain shows no preferential surface enrichment, as sketched in Figure 9II. In the N 1s region, we observe one peak because of the two N atoms of the imidazolium cation.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Spectra (80°) of F 1s, C 1s, and N 1s core levels for (I) clean Ag(111), (II) after deposition of 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at 84 K, (III) after direct deposition of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on top at 84 K, and (IV) after heating to RT. Color coding as in Figures 5 and 6.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Scheme of the film structure in the heating experiment after deposition of a monolayer of 2H-TPP onto 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) at 84 K. The Roman numerals correspond to the spectra shown in Figure 8.

The spectra after deposition of 2H-TPP onto the IL film at 84 K in Figure 8III show a pronounced attenuation of all IL-related XPS signals. We also find two additional peaks in the N 1s and one in the C 1s spectrum related to the two inequivalent nitrogen species and the carbon in 2H-TPP. The spectra clearly indicate that the 2H-TPP molecules remain at the vacuum interface at this LT and cover the IL film underneath; see Figure 9III.

Upon heating to RT, we observe several changes in the XP spectra in Figure 8IV. All IL-related contributions gain intensity—the Calkyl peak shows a particularly strong increase—whereas at the same time, the 2H-TPP signals decrease substantially. We attribute these changes to the diffusion of 2H-TPP molecules to the Ag(111) surface and replacement of the IL at the interface to the metal. As a result, [C8C1Im][PF6] forms the new IL/vacuum interface of the film; see Figure 9IV. Notably, at RT, the FPF6, Ncation, and Chetero signals at 80° are lower than they were in the spectra of the film of pure [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) at 84 K. This is due to the strong enrichment of the alkyl chains at the vacuum interface at RT, which is not observed after the deposition of the IL at 84 K, because of lack of mobility.34,35 The ratio of Chetero/Calkyl of 0.41 at RT in Figure 8IV is similar to the value of equally thick films of pure [C8C1Im][PF6] directly on Ag(111)34 (see also Figure S1 in the Supporting Information).

To further elucidate this exchange process, we monitored the thermal evolution of the F 1s and C 1s peak intensities by in situ temperature-programmed XPS at 80° emission; see Figure 10. After the deposition of one layer of 2H-TPP on 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at 84 K, the layered film was heated from 84 K to RT with a heating rate of 2 K/min. All intensities remain constant up to about 215 K. Thereafter, the FPF6 signal increases by almost 70% until 255 K. Simultaneously, the Calkyl signal of the [C8C1Im]+ cation also increases by more than 100%, whereas the porphyrin-related C 1s contribution decreases to 40%. From this behavior, we conclude that the exchange of the IL molecules by the 2H-TPP molecules at the Ag(111) interface occurs at about 240 K.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Thermal evolution of F 1s and C 1s spectra measured in 80° during heating after deposition of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on top of 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) at 84 K. Heating rate: 2 K/min.

The main driving force for the exchange at the metal interface very likely is the considerably larger adsorption energy of 2H-TPP on the metal surface compared to [C8C1Im][PF6]; the IL WL desorbs at around 445 K, whereas 2H-TPP does not desorb until decomposition occurs at temperatures above 525 K.9,122,123 For comparable exchange processes between different ILs, involving [C8C1Im][PF6]/Ag(111),34,35 the surface tension at the vacuum interface was identified as one of the driving forces, and the other main factor was the stronger adsorption of one of the ILs on the metal. In the present case, no information on the surface tension of 2H-TPP is available. In line with earlier studies on exchange processes in organic bilayers,10,27−30 it seems reasonable to assume that the determining factor for the replacement of [C8C1Im][PF6] by 2H-TPP at the IL/metal interface is the stronger binding of porphyrin to the metal surface.

In our previous temperature-dependent studies dealing with the interdiffusion of [C8C1Im][PF6] with other ILs in ultrathin films on Ag(111),34,35 we observed the onsets of diffusion at temperatures slightly below that of the bulk glass transition of [C8C1Im][PF6], which is at about 190 K.153,154 The exchange of [C8C1Im][PF6] by 2H-TPP on the Ag(111) surface in the present experiment occurs at a temperature that is about 50 K higher. This observation indicates that the exchange process is determined rather by the properties of the porphyrin layer at the vacuum interface, and not by the IL layer below, which should have enough mobility already at a lower temperature. The delay of the exchange process to considerably higher temperatures could result from a change of the physical behavior of [C8C1Im][PF6] because of the confinement of the IL film under the 2H-TPP layer, which itself is likely stabilized laterally by strong phenyl–phenyl bonds.96,97,122,123,132−139,155 Indeed, Chen et al. showed that confinement of a closely related IL, [C4C1Im][PF6], in multiwalled carbon nanotubes led to a considerable increase in the melting point of the IL, likely due to the formation of stable hydrogen bond networks, where shorter than usual C–H–F contacts can be formed.156 Another possibility for the shift of the transition to higher T could be the higher activation energy. Because of the larger size of the porphyrin molecule, two ion pairs need to be replaced at the IL/metal interface for one porphyrin molecule instead of only one cation or anion (as in the case of the previously mentioned IL/IL films on Ag(111)).34,35

For the corresponding experiment on Au(111), we again monitor the F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s signals at 80°; see Figure 11. After deposition of 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Au(111) at 80 K, the ratio of Chetero/Calkyl of 0.63 in Figure 11II is again quite close to the nominal ratio of 0.71 (=5:7). The spectra after the deposition of a single layer of 2H-TPP on top of the IL film in Figure 11III show the porphyrin-related N 1s and C 1s contributions in the expected quantities and a strong attenuation of the IL signals, which again indicate that the porphyrin molecules cover the IL film. Upon heating to RT, the IL-related peak intensities in Figure 11IV increase again, whereas the porphyrin signals lose intensity. With a ratio of Chetero/Calkyl of 0.40 at RT, the alkyl chain enrichment is similar to that on 2H-TPP-covered Ag(111) and also to that of macroscopic films of [C8C1Im][PF6]34,157,158 (see also Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). We therefore conclude that on Au(111) also, the IL at the metal surface is replaced by porphyrin upon heating to RT.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

Spectra (80°) of F 1s, C 1s, and N 1s core levels for (I) clean Au(111), (II) after deposition of 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at 80 K, (III) after direct deposition of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on top at 80 K, and (IV) after heating to RT.

4. Summary and Conclusions

Studying the interaction of the porphyrin 2H-TPP and the IL [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) and Au(111) by ARXPS, we demonstrate for the first time that well-defined bilayered porphyrin/IL film systems stable up to above 100 °C can be produced on both metal surfaces by means of PVD under UHV conditions. Starting with a monolayer of 2H-TPP, we observe the growth of a closed 2D [C8C1Im][PF6] WL on top of the 2H-TPP-covered metal surfaces. Further IL deposition leads to the formation of 3D islands on top of this WL; this Stranski–Kranstanov-like IL growth behavior is less pronounced when [C8C1Im][PF6] is deposited directly on bare Ag(111) and Au(111). Heating the bilayered IL/2H-TPP films to about 385 K does not lead to film intermixing; above this temperature, the IL layer starts to desorb. Similar to [C8C1Im][PF6] multilayers, the IL on the 2H-TPP-covered metals desorbs entirely below 425 K. This contrasts the situation on the bare Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces, where in the absence of 2H-TPP, a clear separation between the desorption of the multilayers and the IL WL in direct contact to the metal was observed. We assume that the porphyrin layer decouples the IL from the metal surfaces, effectively inhibiting the stronger specific adsorption of the ions. After IL desorption, the 2H-TPP layer remains on the surface. In contrast to Ag(111), we observe signs of thermal decomposition of the IL on Au(111) and 2H-TPP/Au(111) in the course of heating, leaving cation-related residuals behind.

After deposition of 2H-TPP on top of a frozen film of [C8C1Im][PF6] at around 80 K, the 2H-TPP layer covers the IL film below. Upon heating, the porphyrin molecules replace the IL at the IL/metal interface at around 240 K. This exchange process is most likely driven by the higher adsorption energy of 2H-TPP on the Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces as compared to the IL. With reference to earlier studies,34,35 we assume that this temperature of 240 K is determined by the onset of mobility of the porphyrin layer.

Our studies on the replacement of IL layers at the IL/metal interface by postdeposition of porphyrins or comparable organic species are highly relevant for the understanding of processes in the liquid phase. In a way, our UHV-based experiment mimics preferential (selective) adsorption of porphyrins on the corresponding substrates from a diluted porphyrin solution. As the deposition from the liquid phase can follow completely different mechanisms from the deposition from the gas phase, the resulting surface structures of the porphyrin layer could be quite different. Such replacement effects are closely related to stability issues of IL-related catalytic systems: on the one hand, poisoning of a SCILL catalyst through adsorption of molecular reagents similar to 2H-TPP could irreversibly block the support surface and would lower the effectivity of the catalyst over time, similar to poisoning of Pt catalysts by sulfur or other nonreactive species.159−162 On the other hand, SILP systems using catalytic centers based on metalloporphyrin derivatives18 could face major challenges if the complexes preferentially adsorb to the support surface and thus are depleted from the liquid phase. The system would lose the characteristic homogeneous nature of the catalyst and possibly diminish its reactivity/selectivity. From an even more general point of view, the observed exchange is also relevant for the stability of organic–organic heterostructures on solid supports. When a device (like a porphyrin-based field-effect transistor) is prepared at one temperature but used at higher temperatures, the increased mobility of the molecules could change the intended structure/organization of the layered film stack.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the European Research Council (ERC) in the form of the Advanced Investigator Grant “ILID” to H.-P.S. (grant agreement no. 693398—ILID) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. We would like to thank Norbert Jux, Ole Lytken, Christian Henkel, and Francesco Greco for helpful discussions.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08531.

  • Molecular orientation during the growth of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) and Au(111), deposition of 2H-TPP on an IL-covered 2H-TPP monolayer, and residuals on Au(111) after IL desorption compared to Ag(111) (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jp9b08531_si_001.pdf (813.1KB, pdf)

References

  1. Jung T. A.; Schlittler R. R.; Gimzewski J. K.; Tang H.; Joachim C. Controlled Room-Temperature Positioning of Individual Molecules: Molecular Flexure and Motion. Science 1996, 271, 181–184. 10.1126/science.271.5246.181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jung T. A.; Schlittler R. R.; Gimzewski J. K. Conformational Identification of Individual Adsorbed Molecules with the STM. Nature 1997, 386, 696–698. 10.1038/386696a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gimzewski J. K.; Joachim C.; Schlittler R. R.; Langlais V.; Tang H.; Johannsen I. Rotation of a Single Molecule within a Supramolecular Bearing. Science 1998, 281, 531–533. 10.1126/science.281.5376.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lopinski G. P.; Moffatt D. J.; Wayner D. D. M.; Wolkow R. A. Determination of the Absolute Chirality of Individual Adsorbed Molecules Using the Scanning Tunnelling Microscope. Nature 1998, 392, 909–911. 10.1038/31913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yokoyama T.; Yokoyama S.; Kamikado T.; Mashiko S. Nonplanar Adsorption and Orientational Ordering of Porphyrin Molecules on Au(111). J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 3814–3818. 10.1063/1.1389276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drain C. M. Self-Organization of Self-Assembled Photonic Materials into Functional Devices: Photo-Switched Conductors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5178. 10.1073/pnas.062635099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Auwärter W.; Weber-Bargioni A.; Riemann A.; Schiffrin A.; Gröning O.; Fasel R.; Barth J. V. Self-Assembly and Conformation of Tetrapyridyl-Porphyrin Molecules on Ag(111). J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 194708. 10.1063/1.2194541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jiang Y.; Yang S.; Li S.; Liu W. Aromatic Molecules on Low-Index Coinage Metal Surfaces: Many-Body Dispersion Effects. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39529. 10.1038/srep39529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ruggieri C.; Rangan S.; Bartynski R. A.; Galoppini E. Zinc(II) Tetraphenylporphyrin on Ag(100) and Ag(111): Multilayer Desorption and Dehydrogenation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 7575–7585. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thussing S.; Fernández L.; Jakob P. Thermal Stability and Interlayer Exchange Processes in Heterolayers of TiOPc and PTCDA on Ag(111). J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2019, 31, 134002. 10.1088/1361-648x/aafcf8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler A. R.; Williams D. L. H. The Physiological Role of Nitric Oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 233–241. 10.1039/cs9932200233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ford P.; Bourassa J.; Miranda K.; Lee B.; Lorkovic I.; Boggs S.; Kudo S.; Laverman L. Photochemistry of Metal Nitrosyl Complexes. Delivery of Nitric Oxide to Biological Targets. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 171, 185–202. 10.1016/s0010-8545(98)00026-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Forrest S. R. Ultrathin Organic Films Grown by Organic Molecular Beam Deposition and Related Techniques. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1793–1896. 10.1021/cr941014o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Paolesse R.; Di Natale C.; Campo Dall’Orto V.; Macagnano A.; Angelaccio A.; Motta N.; Sgarlata A.; Hurst J.; Rezzano I.; Mascini M.; et al. Porphyrin Thin Films Coated Quartz Crystal Microbalances Prepared by Electropolymerization Technique. Thin Solid Films 1999, 354, 245–250. 10.1016/s0040-6090(99)00533-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Saito S.; Osuka A. Expanded Porphyrins: Intriguing Structures, Electronic Properties, and Reactivities. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4342–4373. 10.1002/anie.201003909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zucca P.; Neves C. M.; Simoes M. M.; Neves Mda G.; Cocco G.; Sanjust E. Immobilized Lignin Peroxidase-Like Metalloporphyrins as Reusable Catalysts in Oxidative Bleaching of Industrial Dyes. Molecules 2016, 21, 964. 10.3390/molecules21070964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thompson S. J.; Brennan M. R.; Lee S. Y.; Dong G. Synthesis and Applications of Rhodium Porphyrin Complexes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 929–981. 10.1039/c7cs00582b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dees A.; Jux N.; Tröppner O.; Dürr K.; Lippert R.; Schmid M.; Küstner B.; Schlücker S.; Steinrück H.-P.; Gottfried J. M.; et al. Reactions of Superoxide with Iron Porphyrins in the Bulk and the near-Surface Region of Ionic Liquids. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 6862–6872. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Williams F. J.; Vaughan O. P. H.; Knox K. J.; Bampos N.; Lambert R. M. First Observation of Capping/Uncapping by a Ligand of a Zn Porphyrin Adsorbed on Ag(100). Chem. Commun. 2004, 1688–1689. 10.1039/b407374f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Offord D. A.; Sachs S. B.; Ennis M. S.; Eberspacher T. A.; Griffin J. H.; Chidsey C. E. D.; Collman J. P. Synthesis and Properties of Metalloporphyrin Monolayers and Stacked Multilayers Bound to an Electrode Via Site Specific Axial Ligation to a Self-Assembled Monolayer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4478–4487. 10.1021/ja973528l. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kanjilal A.; Ottaviano L.; Di Castro V.; Beccari M.; Betti M. G.; Mariani C. Pentacene Grown on Self-Assembled Monolayer: Adsorption Energy, Interface Dipole, and Electronic Properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 286–293. 10.1021/jp065026c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wei Y.; Reutt-Robey J. E. Directed Organization of C70 Kagome Lattice by Titanyl Phthalocyanine Monolayer Template. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15232–15235. 10.1021/ja206175c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Skomski D.; Tait S. L. Interfacial Organic Layers for Chemical Stability and Crystalline Ordering of Thiophene and Carboxyl Films on a Metal Surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 1594–1601. 10.1021/jp409799f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Korolkov V. V.; Baldoni M.; Watanabe K.; Taniguchi T.; Besley E.; Beton P. H. Supramolecular Heterostructures Formed by Sequential Epitaxial Deposition of Two-Dimensional Hydrogen-Bonded Arrays. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 1191. 10.1038/nchem.2824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Buck M. A Step Beyond Flatland. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 1152. 10.1038/nchem.2901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. He Y.; Kröger J.; Wang Y. Organic Multilayer Films Studied by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 429–450. 10.1002/cphc.201600979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang Q.; Franco-Cañellas A.; Ji P.; Bürker C.; Wang R.-B.; Broch K.; Thakur P. K.; Lee T.-L.; Zhang H.; Gerlach A.; et al. Bilayer Formation Vs Molecular Exchange in Organic Heterostructures: Strong Impact of Subtle Changes in Molecular Structure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 9480–9490. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thussing S.; Jakob P. Thermal Stability and Interlayer Exchange Processes in Heterolayers of CuPc and PTCDA on Ag(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 13680–13691. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gallego J. M.; Ecija D.; Martín N.; Otero R.; Miranda R. An STM Study of Molecular Exchange Processes in Organic Thin Film Growth. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9954–9957. 10.1039/c4cc03656e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Deimel P. S.; Feulner P.; Barth J. V.; Allegretti F. Spatial Decoupling of Macrocyclic Metal–Organic Complexes from a Metal Support: A 4-Fluorothiophenol Self-Assembled Monolayer as a Thermally Removable Spacer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 10992–11003. 10.1039/c9cp01583c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang Z.; Hou S.; Zhu Z.; Liu Z. Preparation and Characterization of a Porphyrin Self-Assembled Monolayer with a Controlled Orientation on Gold. Langmuir 2000, 16, 537–540. 10.1021/la990570g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang Z.; Imae T.; Sato H.; Watanabe A.; Ozaki Y. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering and Surface-Enhanced Infrared Absorption Spectroscopic Studies of a Metalloporphyrin Monolayer Film Formed on Pyridine Self-Assembled Monolayer-Modified Gold. Langmuir 2001, 17, 4564–4568. 10.1021/la001700k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang X.-L.; Chen L.-G.; Lv P.; Gao H.-Y.; Wei S.-J.; Dong Z.-C.; Hou J. G. Fluorescence Decay of Quasimonolayered Porphyrins near a Metal Surface Separated by Short-Chain Alkanethiols. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 223118. 10.1063/1.2938861. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lexow M.; Heller B. S. J.; Maier F.; Steinrück H.-P. Anion Exchange at the Liquid/Solid Interface of Ultrathin Ionic Liquid Films on Ag(111). ChemPhysChem 2018, 19, 2978–2984. 10.1002/cphc.201800773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lexow M.; Heller B. S. J.; Partl G.; Bhuin R. G.; Maier F.; Steinrück H.-P. Cation Exchange at the Interfaces of Ultrathin Films of Fluorous Ionic Liquids on Ag(111). Langmuir 2019, 35, 398–405. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kernchen U.; Etzold B.; Korth W.; Jess A. Solid Catalyst with Ionic Liquid Layer (SCILL) – a New Concept to Improve Selectivity Illustrated by Hydrogenation of Cyclooctadiene. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2007, 30, 985–994. 10.1002/ceat.200700050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mehnert C. P.; Mozeleski E. J.; Cook R. A. Supported Ionic Liquid Catalysis Investigated for Hydrogenation Reactions. Chem. Commun. 2002, 3010–3011. 10.1039/b210214e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Riisager A.; Fehrmann R.; Flicker S.; van Hal R.; Haumann M.; Wasserscheid P. Very Stable and Highly Regioselective Supported Ionic-Liquid-Phase (SILP) Catalysis: Continuous-Flow Fixed-Bed Hydroformylation of Propene. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 815–819. 10.1002/anie.200461534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Riisager A.; Fehrmann R.; Haumann M.; Wasserscheid P. Supported Ionic Liquids: Versatile Reaction and Separation Media. Top. Catal. 2006, 40, 91–102. 10.1007/s11244-006-0111-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Welton T. Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids. Solvents for Synthesis and Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071–2084. 10.1021/cr980032t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wasserscheid P.; Keim W. Ionic Liquids—New “Solutions” for Transition Metal Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3772–3789. 10.1002/1521-3773(20001103)39:21<3772::aid-anie3772>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Huang J.; Jiang T.; Gao H.; Han B.; Liu Z.; Wu W.; Chang Y.; Zhao G. Pd Nanoparticles Immobilized on Molecular Sieves by Ionic Liquids: Heterogeneous Catalysts for Solvent-Free Hydrogenation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1397–1399. 10.1002/anie.200352682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hagiwara H.; Sugawara Y.; Isobe K.; Hoshi T.; Suzuki T. Immobilization of Pd(OAc)2 in Ionic Liquid on Silica: Application to Sustainable Mizoroki–Heck Reaction. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2325–2328. 10.1021/ol049343i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Breitenlechner S.; Fleck M.; Müller T. E.; Suppan A. Solid Catalysts on the Basis of Supported Ionic Liquids and Their Use in Hydroamination Reactions. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2004, 214, 175–179. 10.1016/j.molcata.2003.12.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Riisager A.; Fehrmann R.; Haumann M.; Gorle B. S. K.; Wasserscheid P. Stability and Kinetic Studies of Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Catalysts for Hydroformylation of Propene. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 9853–9859. 10.1021/ie050629g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yamaguchi K.; Yoshida C.; Uchida S.; Mizuno N. Peroxotungstate Immobilized on Ionic Liquid-Modified Silica as a Heterogeneous Epoxidation Catalyst with Hydrogen Peroxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 530–531. 10.1021/ja043688e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang Y.; Deng C.; Yuan Y. Characterization and Hydroformylation Performance of Mesoporous MCM-41-Supported Water-Soluble Rh Complex Dissolved in Ionic Liquids. J. Catal. 2005, 232, 108–116. 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.02.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Binnemans K. Ionic Liquid Crystals. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4148–4204. 10.1021/cr0400919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Steffan M.; Lucas M.; Brandner A.; Wollny M.; Oldenburg N.; Claus P. Selective Hydrogenation of Citral in an Organic Solvent, in a Ionic Liquid, and in Substance. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2007, 30, 481–486. 10.1002/ceat.200600286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Virtanen P.; Salmi T.; Mikkola J.-P. Kinetics of Cinnamaldehyde Hydrogenation by Supported Ionic Liquid Catalysts (Silca). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 10335–10342. 10.1021/ie901041z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Virtanen P.; Salmi T. O.; Mikkola J.-P. Supported Ionic Liquid Catalysts (SILCA) for Preparation of Organic Chemicals. Top. Catal. 2010, 53, 1096–1103. 10.1007/s11244-010-9540-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Haumann M.; Schönweiz A.; Breitzke H.; Buntkowsky G.; Werner S.; Szesni N. Solid-State NMR Investigations of Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Water-Gas Shift Catalysts: Ionic Liquid Film Distribution Vs. Catalyst Performance. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2012, 35, 1421–1426. 10.1002/ceat.201200025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Heinze M. T.; Zill J. C.; Matysik J.; Einicke W. D.; Gläser R.; Stark A. Solid–Ionic Liquid Interfaces: Pore Filling Revisited. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 24359–24372. 10.1039/c4cp02749c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pinilla C.; Del Pópolo M. G.; Lynden-Bell R. M.; Kohanoff J. Structure and Dynamics of a Confined Ionic Liquid. Topics of Relevance to Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 17922–17927. 10.1021/jp052999o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Silvester D. S. Recent Advances in the Use of Ionic Liquids for Electrochemical Sensing. Analyst 2011, 136, 4871–4882. 10.1039/c1an15699c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vatamanu J.; Borodin O.; Smith G. D. Molecular Simulations of the Electric Double Layer Structure, Differential Capacitance, and Charging Kinetics for N-Methyl-N-Propylpyrrolidinium Bis(Fluorosulfonyl)Imide at Graphite Electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 3073–3084. 10.1021/jp2001207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Goossens K.; Lava K.; Bielawski C. W.; Binnemans K. Ionic Liquid Crystals: Versatile Materials. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 4643–4807. 10.1021/cr400334b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhou F.; Liang Y.; Liu W. Ionic Liquid Lubricants: Designed Chemistry for Engineering Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2590–2599. 10.1039/b817899m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Cooper P. K.; Wear C. J.; Li H.; Atkin R. Ionic Liquid Lubrication of Stainless Steel: Friction Is Inversely Correlated with Interfacial Liquid Nanostructure. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 11737–11743. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Cooper P. K.; Staddon J.; Zhang S.; Aman Z. M.; Atkin R.; Li H. Nano- and Macroscale Study of the Lubrication of Titania Using Pure and Diluted Ionic Liquids. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 287. 10.3389/fchem.2019.00287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Maier F. Capture of Carbon Dioxide at the Gas–Liquid Interface Elucidated by Surface Science Approaches. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10133–10134. 10.1002/anie.201105157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Niedermaier I.; Bahlmann M.; Papp C.; Kolbeck C.; Wei W.; Krick Calderón S.; Grabau M.; Schulz P. S.; Wasserscheid P.; Steinrück H.-P.; et al. Carbon Dioxide Capture by an Amine Functionalized Ionic Liquid: Fundamental Differences of Surface and Bulk Behavior. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 436–441. 10.1021/ja410745a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Chen S.; Sun Y.; Chao J.; Cheng L.; Chen Y.; Liu J. Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction of Silver Nanoparticles in Water Using Ionic Liquid 1-Octyl-3-Methylimidazolium Hexafluorophosphate. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 41, 211–217. 10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Johnston M.; Lee J.-J.; Chottiner G. S.; Miller B.; Tsuda T.; Hussey C. L.; Scherson D. A. Electrochemistry in Ultrahigh Vacuum: Underpotential Deposition of Al on Polycrystalline W and Au from Room Temperature AlCl3/1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Chloride Melts. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11296–11300. 10.1021/jp051243m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Endres F.; Zein El Abedin S. Air and Water Stable Ionic Liquids in Physical Chemistry. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 2101–2116. 10.1039/b600519p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Souda R. Matrix Effects on Secondary Ion Emission from a Room-Temperature Ionic Liquid, 1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Bis[Trifluoromethanesulfonyl]Imide. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 244707. 10.1063/1.3159394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Souda R. Phase Transition of 1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Bis(Trifluoromethylsulfonyl)Imide Thin Films on Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 12973–12977. 10.1021/jp9049439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Endres F.; Höfft O.; Borisenko N.; Gasparotto L. H.; Prowald A.; Al-Salman R.; Carstens T.; Atkin R.; Bund A.; Zein El Abedin S. Do Solvation Layers of Ionic Liquids Influence Electrochemical Reactions?. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 1724–1732. 10.1039/b923527m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Weingarth D.; Foelske-Schmitz A.; Wokaun A.; Kötz R. In Situ Electrochemical Xps Study of the Pt/[EMIm][BF4] System. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 619–622. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.03.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Reyna-González J. M.; Reyes-López J. C.; Aguilar-Martínez M. Silver and Silver–Copper Electrodeposition from a Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquid. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 94, 344–352. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Elbourne A.; McDonald S.; Voïchovsky K.; Endres F.; Warr G. G.; Atkin R. Nanostructure of the Ionic Liquid–Graphite Stern Layer. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 7608–7620. 10.1021/acsnano.5b02921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Buchner F.; Forster-Tonigold K.; Bozorgchenani M.; Gross A.; Behm R. J. Interaction of a Self-Assembled Ionic Liquid Layer with Graphite(0001): A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 226–233. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Carstens T.; Lahiri A.; Borisenko N.; Endres F. [Py1,4]Fsi-Nafsi-Based Ionic Liquid Electrolyte for Sodium Batteries: Na+ Solvation and Interfacial Nanostructure on Au(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 14736–14741. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04729. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu Z.; Cui T.; Lu T.; Shapouri Ghazvini M.; Endres F. Anion Effects on the Solid/Ionic Liquid Interface and the Electrodeposition of Zinc. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 20224–20231. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Buchner F.; Forster-Tonigold K.; Kim J.; Adler C.; Bansmann J.; Groß A.; Behm R. J. Experimental and Computational Study on the Interaction of an Ionic Liquid Monolayer with Lithium on Pristine and Lithiated Graphite. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 18968–18981. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04660. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Armel V.; Pringle J. M.; Forsyth M.; MacFarlane D. R.; Officer D. L.; Wagner P. Ionic Liquid Electrolyte Porphyrin Dye Sensitised Solar Cells. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3146–3148. 10.1039/b926087k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. MacFarlane D. R.; Tachikawa N.; Forsyth M.; Pringle J. M.; Howlett P. C.; Elliott G. D.; Davis J. H.; Watanabe M.; Simon P.; Angell C. A. Energy Applications of Ionic Liquids. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 232–250. 10.1039/c3ee42099j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Castner E. W. Jr.; Wishart J. F. Spotlight on Ionic Liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 120901. 10.1063/1.3373178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Steinrück H.-P.; Libuda J.; Wasserscheid P.; Cremer T.; Kolbeck C.; Laurin M.; Maier F.; Sobota M.; Schulz P. S.; Stark M. Surface Science and Model Catalysis with Ionic Liquid-Modified Materials. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2571–2587. 10.1002/adma.201100211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Steinrück H.-P. Recent Developments in the Study of Ionic Liquid Interfaces Using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Potential Future Directions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 5010–5029. 10.1039/c2cp24087d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Schernich S.; Laurin M.; Lykhach Y.; Tsud N.; Sobota M.; Skála T.; Prince K. C.; Taccardi N.; Wagner V.; Steinrück H.-P.; et al. Interactions of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids with Oxide Surfaces Controlled by Alkyl Chain Functionalization. ChemPhysChem 2013, 14, 3673–3677. 10.1002/cphc.201300792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Schernich S.; Laurin M.; Lykhach Y.; Steinrück H.-P.; Tsud N.; Skála T.; Prince K. C.; Taccardi N.; Matolín V.; Wasserscheid P.; et al. Functionalization of Oxide Surfaces through Reaction with 1,3-Dialkylimidazolium Ionic Liquids. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 30–35. 10.1021/jz301856a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Steinrück H.-P.; Wasserscheid P. Ionic Liquids in Catalysis. Catal. Lett. 2015, 145, 380–397. 10.1007/s10562-014-1435-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Liu Y.; Zhang Y.; Wu G.; Hu J. Coexistence of Liquid and Solid Phases of BMIm-PF6 Ionic Liquid on Mica Surfaces at Room Temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7456–7457. 10.1021/ja062685u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Cremer T.; Wibmer L.; Calderón S. K.; Deyko A.; Maier F.; Steinrück H.-P. Interfaces of Ionic Liquids and Transition Metal Surfaces-Adsorption, Growth, and Thermal Reactions of Ultrathin [C1c1im][Tf2n] Films on Metallic and Oxidised Ni(111) Surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 5153–5163. 10.1039/c2cp40278e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Delcheva I.; Ralston J.; Beattie D. A.; Krasowska M. Static and Dynamic Wetting Behaviour of Ionic Liquids. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 222, 162–171. 10.1016/j.cis.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Rietzler F.; May B.; Steinrück H.-P.; Maier F. Switching Adsorption and Growth Behavior of Ultrathin [C2C1Im][OTf] Films on Au(111) by Pd Deposition. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 25143–25150. 10.1039/c6cp04938a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Delcheva I.; Beattie D. A.; Ralston J.; Krasowska M. Dynamic Wetting of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids on Gold and Glass. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 2084–2093. 10.1039/c7cp06404g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Lexow M.; Talwar T.; Heller B. S. J.; May B.; Bhuin R. G.; Maier F.; Steinrück H.-P. Time-Dependent Changes in the Growth of Ultrathin Ionic Liquid Films on Ag(111). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 12929–12938. 10.1039/c8cp01411f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Gong X.; Wang B.; Li L. Spreading of Nanodroplets of Ionic Liquids on the Mica Surface. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 16398–16402. 10.1021/acsomega.8b02423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wittstock A.; Neumann B.; Schaefer A.; Dumbuya K.; Kübel C.; Biener M. M.; Zielasek V.; Steinrück H.-P.; Gottfried J. M.; Biener J.; et al. Nanoporous Au: An Unsupported Pure Gold Catalyst?. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 5593–5600. 10.1021/jp808185v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Xu B.; Siler C. G. F.; Madix R. J.; Friend C. M. Ag/Au Mixed Sites Promote Oxidative Coupling of Methanol on the Alloy Surface. Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 4646–4652. 10.1002/chem.201304837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Gottfried J. M. Surface Chemistry of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2015, 70, 259–379. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2015.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Lukasczyk T.; Flechtner K.; Merte L. R.; Jux N.; Maier F.; Gottfried J. M.; Steinrück H.-P. Interaction of Cobalt(II) Tetraarylporphyrins with a Ag(111) Surface Studied with Photoelectron Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 3090–3098. 10.1021/jp0652345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Shubina T. E.; Marbach H.; Flechtner K.; Kretschmann A.; Jux N.; Buchner F.; Steinrück H.-P.; Clark T.; Gottfried J. M. Principle and Mechanism of Direct Porphyrin Metalation: Joint Experimental and Theoretical Investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9476–9483. 10.1021/ja072360t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Rojas G.; Chen X.; Bravo C.; Kim J.-H.; Kim J.-S.; Xiao J.; Dowben P. A.; Gao Y.; Zeng X. C.; Choe W.; et al. Self-Assembly and Properties of Nonmetalated Tetraphenyl-Porphyrin on Metal Substrates. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 9408–9415. 10.1021/jp1012957. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Brede J.; Linares M.; Kuck S.; Schwöbel J.; Scarfato A.; Chang S.-H.; Hoffmann G.; Wiesendanger R.; Lensen R.; Kouwer P. H. J.; et al. Dynamics of Molecular Self-Ordering in Tetraphenyl Porphyrin Monolayers on Metallic Substrates. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 275602. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/27/275602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Gottfried J. M.; Flechtner K.; Kretschmann A.; Lukasczyk T.; Steinrück H.-P. Direct Synthesis of a Metalloporphyrin Complex on a Surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5644–5645. 10.1021/ja0610333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Cremer T.; Killian M.; Gottfried J. M.; Paape N.; Wasserscheid P.; Maier F.; Steinrück H.-P. Physical Vapor Deposition of [EMIm][Tf2N]: A New Approach to the Modification of Surface Properties with Ultrathin Ionic Liquid Films. ChemPhysChem 2008, 9, 2185–2190. 10.1002/cphc.200800300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Chan B.; Chang N.; Grimmett M. The Synthesis and Thermolysis of Imidazole Quaternary Salts. Aust. J. Chem. 1977, 30, 2005–2013. 10.1071/ch9772005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lovelock K. R. J.; Armstrong J. P.; Licence P.; Jones R. G. Vaporisation and Thermal Decomposition of Dialkylimidazolium Halide Ion Ionic Liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 1339–1353. 10.1039/c3cp52950a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Armstrong J. P.; Hurst C.; Jones R. G.; Licence P.; Lovelock K. R. J.; Satterley C. J.; Villar-Garcia I. J. Vapourisation of Ionic Liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 982–990. 10.1039/b615137j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Leal J. P.; Esperança J. M. S. S.; Minas da Piedade M. E.; Canongia Lopes J. N.; Rebelo L. P. N.; Seddon K. R. The Nature of Ionic Liquids in the Gas Phase. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 6176–6182. 10.1021/jp073006k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Akai N.; Parazs D.; Kawai A.; Shibuya K. Cryogenic Neon Matrix-Isolation Ftir Spectroscopy of Evaporated Ionic Liquids: Geometrical Structure of Cation–Anion 1:1 Pair in the Gas Phase. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 4756–4762. 10.1021/jp8107478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Cremer T.; Stark M.; Deyko A.; Steinrück H.-P.; Maier F. Liquid/Solid Interface of Ultrathin Ionic Liquid Films: [C1C1Im][Tf2N] and [C8C1Im][Tf2N] on Au(111). Langmuir 2011, 27, 3662–3671. 10.1021/la105007c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Foulston R.; Gangopadhyay S.; Chiutu C.; Moriarty P.; Jones R. G. Mono- and Multi-Layer Adsorption of an Ionic Liquid on Au(110). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 6054–6066. 10.1039/c2cp23901a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Hessey S. G.; Jones R. G. On the Evaporation, Bonding, and Adsorbate Capture of an Ionic Liquid on Au(111). Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 2519–2529. 10.1039/c3sc00072a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  108. Uhl B.; Huang H.; Alwast D.; Buchner F.; Behm R. J. Interaction of Ionic Liquids with Noble Metal Surfaces: Structure Formation and Stability of [OMIm][TFSA] and [EMIm][TFSA] on Au(111) and Ag(111). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 23816–23832. 10.1039/c5cp03787e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Biedron A. B.; Garfunkel E. L.; Castner E. W. Jr.; Rangan S. Ionic Liquid Ultrathin Films at the Surface of Cu(100) and Au(111). J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146, 054704. 10.1063/1.4975101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Horike S.; Ayano M.; Tsuno M.; Fukushima T.; Koshiba Y.; Misaki M.; Ishida K. Thermodynamics of Ionic Liquid Evaporation under Vacuum. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 21262–21268. 10.1039/c8cp02233j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Shirley D. A. High-Resolution X-Ray Photoemission Spectrum of the Valence Bands of Gold. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1972, 5, 4709–4714. 10.1103/physrevb.5.4709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Bates C. W.; Wertheim G. K.; Buchanan D. N. E. Nature of the 3.8 ev Plasmon in X-Ray Photoemission from Silver. Phys. Lett. A 1979, 72, 178–180. 10.1016/0375-9601(79)90686-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Leiro J.; Minni E.; Suoninen E. Study of Plasmon Structure in XPS Spectra of Silver and Gold. J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 1983, 13, 215. 10.1088/0305-4608/13/1/024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Mårtensson N.; Nyholm R.; Johansson B. New Observation of Two-Hole Core-Level Satellites in Copper, Silver, and Gold. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1984, 29, 4800–4802. 10.1103/physrevb.29.4800. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  115. Schmid M.; Kaftan A.; Steinrück H.-P.; Gottfried J. M. The Electronic Structure of Cobalt(II) Phthalocyanine Adsorbed on Ag(111). Surf. Sci. 2012, 606, 945–949. 10.1016/j.susc.2012.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Deyko A.; Bajus S.; Rietzler F.; Bösmann A.; Wasserscheid P.; Steinrück H.-P.; Maier F. Interface Properties and Physicochemical Characterization of the Low-Temperature Molten Salt Li/K/Cs Acetate. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 22939–22946. 10.1021/jp407689c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Rietzler F.; Piermaier M.; Deyko A.; Steinrück H.-P.; Maier F. Electrospray Ionization Deposition of Ultrathin Ionic Liquid Films: [C8C1Im]Cl and [C8C1Im][Tf2N] on Au(111). Langmuir 2014, 30, 1063–1071. 10.1021/la404429q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Argile C.; Rhead G. E. Adsorbed Layer and Thin Film Growth Modes Monitored by Auger Electron Spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1989, 10, 277–356. 10.1016/0167-5729(89)90001-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Rietzler F.; Nagengast J.; Steinrück H.-P.; Maier F. Interface of Ionic Liquids and Carbon: Ultrathin [C1C1Im][Tf2N] Films on Graphite and Graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 28068–28076. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  120. Deyko A.; Cremer T.; Rietzler F.; Perkin S.; Crowhurst L.; Welton T.; Steinrück H.-P.; Maier F. Interfacial Behavior of Thin Ionic Liquid Films on Mica. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 5101–5111. 10.1021/jp3115397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  121. Kolbeck C.; Lehmann J.; Lovelock K. R. J.; Cremer T.; Paape N.; Wasserscheid P.; Fröba A. P.; Maier F.; Steinrück H.-P. Density and Surface Tension of Ionic Liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 17025–17036. 10.1021/jp1068413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Buchner F.; Kellner I.; Hieringer W.; Görling A.; Steinrück H.-P.; Marbach H. Ordering Aspects and Intramolecular Conformation of Tetraphenylporphyrins on Ag(111). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 13082–13090. 10.1039/c004551a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Di Santo G.; Blankenburg S.; Castellarin-Cudia C.; Fanetti M.; Borghetti P.; Sangaletti L.; Floreano L.; Verdini A.; Magnano E.; Bondino F.; et al. Supramolecular Engineering through Temperature-Induced Chemical Modification of 2H-Tetraphenylporphyrin on Ag(111): Flat Phenyl Conformation and Possible Dehydrogenation Reactions. Chem.—Eur. J. 2011, 17, 14354–14359. 10.1002/chem.201102268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Narioka S.; Ishii H.; Ouchi Y.; Yokoyama T.; Ohta T.; Seki K. Xanes Spectroscopic Studies of Evaporated Porphyrin Films: Molecular Orientation and Electronic Structure. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 1332–1337. 10.1021/j100004a038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  125. Polzonetti G.; Carravetta V.; Iucci G.; Ferri A.; Paolucci G.; Goldoni A.; Parent P.; Laffon C.; Russo M. V. Electronic Structure of Platinum Complex/Zn-Porphyrinato Assembled Macrosystems, Related Precursors and Model Molecules, as Probed by X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy (NEXAFS): Theory and Experiment. Chem. Phys. 2004, 296, 87–100. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2003.09.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  126. Wang S. D.; Dong X.; Lee C. S.; Lee S. T. Orderly Growth of Copper Phthalocyanine on Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite (HOPG) at High Substrate Temperatures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1529–1532. 10.1021/jp0361733. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  127. Chen M.; Feng X.; Zhang L.; Ju H.; Xu Q.; Zhu J.; Gottfried J. M.; Ibrahim K.; Qian H.; Wang J. Direct Synthesis of Nickel(II) Tetraphenylporphyrin and Its Interaction with a Au(111) Surface: A Comprehensive Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 9908–9916. 10.1021/jp102031m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Cudia C. C.; Vilmercati P.; Larciprete R.; Cepek C.; Zampieri G.; Sangaletti L.; Pagliara S.; Verdini A.; Cossaro A.; Floreano L.; et al. Electronic Structure and Molecular Orientation of a Zn-Tetra-Phenyl Porphyrin Multilayer on Si(111). Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 4013–4017. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.01.115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  129. Stock T. J. Z.; Nogami J. Copper Phthalocyanine Thin Films on Cu(111): Sub-Monolayer to Multi-Layer. Surf. Sci. 2015, 637–638, 132–139. 10.1016/j.susc.2015.03.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  130. Checcoli P.; Conte G.; Salvatori S.; Paolesse R.; Bolognesi A.; Berliocchi M.; Brunetti F.; D’Amico A.; Di Carlo A.; Lugli P. Tetra-Phenyl Porphyrin Based Thin Film Transistors. Synth. Met. 2003, 138, 261–266. 10.1016/s0379-6779(02)01308-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  131. Karl N. Charge Carrier Transport in Organic Semiconductors. Synth. Met. 2003, 133–134, 649–657. 10.1016/s0379-6779(02)00398-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  132. Rojas G.; Chen X.; Kunkel D.; Bode M.; Enders A. Temperature Dependence of Metal–Organic Heteroepitaxy. Langmuir 2011, 27, 14267–14271. 10.1021/la203389d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Rojas G.; Simpson S.; Chen X.; Kunkel D. A.; Nitz J.; Xiao J.; Dowben P. A.; Zurek E.; Enders A. Surface State Engineering of Molecule–Molecule Interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 4971–4976. 10.1039/c2cp40254h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Comanici K.; Buchner F.; Flechtner K.; Lukasczyk T.; Gottfried J. M.; Steinrück H.-P.; Marbach H. Understanding the Contrast Mechanism in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) Images of an Intermixed Tetraphenylporphyrin Layer on Ag(111). Langmuir 2008, 24, 1897–1901. 10.1021/la703263e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Buchner F.; Flechtner K.; Bai Y.; Zillner E.; Kellner I.; Steinrück H.-P.; Marbach H.; Gottfried J. M. Coordination of Iron Atoms by Tetraphenylporphyrin Monolayers and Multilayers on Ag(111) and Formation of Iron-Tetraphenylporphyrin. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 15458–15465. 10.1021/jp8052955. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  136. Buchner F.; Warnick K.-G.; Wölfle T.; Görling A.; Steinrück H.-P.; Hieringer W.; Marbach H. Chemical Fingerprints of Large Organic Molecules in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Imaging Adsorbate–Substrate Coupling of Metalloporphyrins. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 16450–16457. 10.1021/jp904680c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  137. Di Santo G.; Castellarin-Cudia C.; Fanetti M.; Taleatu B.; Borghetti P.; Sangaletti L.; Floreano L.; Magnano E.; Bondino F.; Goldoni A. Conformational Adaptation and Electronic Structure of 2H-Tetraphenylporphyrin on Ag(111) During Fe Metalation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 4155–4162. 10.1021/jp111151n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Di Santo G.; Sfiligoj C.; Castellarin-Cudia C.; Verdini A.; Cossaro A.; Morgante A.; Floreano L.; Goldoni A. Changes of the Molecule–Substrate Interaction Upon Metal Inclusion into a Porphyrin. Chem.—Eur. J. 2012, 18, 12619–12623. 10.1002/chem.201201640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Seufert K.; Auwärter W.; de Abajo F. J. G.; Ecija D.; Vijayaraghavan S.; Joshi S.; Barth J. V. Controlled Interaction of Surface Quantum-Well Electronic States. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 6130–6135. 10.1021/nl403459m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Stranski I. N.; Krastanow L. Zur Theorie Der Orientierten Ausscheidung Von Ionenkristallen Aufeinander. Monatshefte Chem. 1937, 71, 351–364. 10.1007/bf01798103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  141. Kilian L.; Umbach E.; Sokolowski M. Molecular Beam Epitaxy of Organic Films Investigated by High Resolution Low Energy Electron Diffraction (SPA-LEED): 3,4,9,10-Perylenetetracarboxylicacid-Dianhydride (PTCDA) on Ag(111). Surf. Sci. 2004, 573, 359–378. 10.1016/j.susc.2004.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  142. Marchetto H.; Schmidt T.; Groh U.; Maier F. C.; Lévesque P. L.; Fink R. H.; Freund H.-J.; Umbach E. Direct Observation of Epitaxial Organic Film Growth: Temperature-Dependent Growth Mechanisms and Metastability. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 29150–29160. 10.1039/c5cp05124j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Schmidt T.; Marchetto H.; Groh U.; Fink R. H.; Freund H.-J.; Umbach E. Influence of Substrate Bonding and Surface Morphology on Dynamic Organic Layer Growth: Perylenetetracarboxylic Dianhydride on Au(111). Langmuir 2018, 34, 5444–5453. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Schmidt T.; Marchetto H.; Groh U.; Fink R. H.; Umbach E. Complex Monolayer Growth Dynamics of a Highly Symmetric Molecule: NTCDA on Ag(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 8244–8255. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Hamor M. J.; Hamor T. A.; Hoard J. L. The Structure of Crystalline Tetraphenylporphine. The Stereochemical Nature of the Porphine Skeleton. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1938–1942. 10.1021/ja01064a008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  146. Silvers S. J.; Tulinsky A. The Crystal and Molecular Structure of Triclinic Tetraphenylporphyrin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 3331–3337. 10.1021/ja00989a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Habenschaden E.; Küppers J. Evaluation of Flash Desorption Spectra. Surf. Sci. Lett. 1984, 138, L147–L150. 10.1016/0167-2584(84)90346-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  148. Schöll A.; Zou Y.; Jung M.; Schmidt T.; Fink R.; Umbach E. Line Shapes and Satellites in High-Resolution X-Ray Photoelectron Spectra of Large π-Conjugated Organic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 10260–10267. 10.1063/1.1807812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Sarkar D. K.; Zhou X. J.; Tannous A.; Louie M.; Leung K. T. Growth of Self-Assembled Copper Nanostructure on Conducting Polymer by Electrodeposition. Solid State Commun. 2003, 125, 365–368. 10.1016/s0038-1098(02)00883-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  150. Elbourne A.; McLean B.; Voïtchovsky K.; Warr G. G.; Atkin R. Molecular Resolution in Situ Imaging of Spontaneous Graphene Exfoliation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 3118–3122. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Liu W.; Maaß F.; Willenbockel M.; Bronner C.; Schulze M.; Soubatch S.; Tautz F. S.; Tegeder P.; Tkatchenko A. Quantitative Prediction of Molecular Adsorption: Structure and Binding of Benzene on Coinage Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 036104. 10.1103/physrevlett.115.036104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Maaß F.; Jiang Y.; Liu W.; Tkatchenko A.; Tegeder P. Binding Energies of Benzene on Coinage Metal Surfaces: Equal Stability on Different Metals. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 214703. 10.1063/1.5030094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Huddleston J. G.; Visser A. E.; Reichert W. M.; Willauer H. D.; Broker G. A.; Rogers R. D. Characterization and Comparison of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Room Temperature Ionic Liquids Incorporating the Imidazolium Cation. Green Chem. 2001, 3, 156–164. 10.1039/b103275p. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  154. Sippel P.; Lunkenheimer P.; Krohns S.; Thoms E.; Loidl A. Importance of Liquid Fragility for Energy Applications of Ionic Liquids. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13922. 10.1038/srep13922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Auwärter W.; Weber-Bargioni A.; Brink S.; Riemann A.; Schiffrin A.; Ruben M.; Barth J. V. Controlled Metalation of Self-Assembled Porphyrin Nanoarrays in Two Dimensions. ChemPhys­Chem 2007, 8, 250–254. 10.1002/cphc.200600675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Chen S.; Wu G.; Sha M.; Huang S. Transition of Ionic Liquid [BMIm][PF6] from Liquid to High-Melting-Point Crystal When Confined in Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2416–2417. 10.1021/ja067972c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Kolbeck C.; Cremer T.; Lovelock K. R. J.; Paape N.; Schulz P. S.; Wasserscheid P.; Maier F.; Steinrück H.-P. Influence of Different Anions on the Surface Composition of Ionic Liquids Studied Using ARXPS. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 8682–8688. 10.1021/jp902978r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Maier F.; Cremer T.; Kolbeck C.; Lovelock K. R. J.; Paape N.; Schulz P. S.; Wasserscheid P.; Steinrück H.-P. Insights into the Surface Composition and Enrichment Effects of Ionic Liquids and Ionic Liquid Mixtures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 1905–1915. 10.1039/b920804f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Happel M.; Desikusumastuti A.; Sobota M.; Laurin M.; Libuda J. Impact of Sulfur Poisoning on the NOx Uptake of a NOx Storage and Reduction (NSR) Model Catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 4568–4575. 10.1021/jp910777r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  160. Happel M.; Lykhach Y.; Tsud N.; Skála T.; Prince K. C.; Matolín V.; Libuda J. Mechanism of Sulfur Poisoning and Storage: Adsorption and Reaction of SO2 with Stoichiometric and Reduced Ceria Films on Cu(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 19872–19882. 10.1021/jp207014z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  161. Papp C.; Steinrück H.-P. In Situ High-Resolution X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy – Fundamental Insights in Surface Reactions. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2013, 68, 446–487. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2013.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  162. Zhang G.-R.; Munoz M.; Etzold B. J. M. Accelerating Oxygen-Reduction Catalysts through Preventing Poisoning with Non-Reactive Species by Using Hydrophobic Ionic Liquids. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2257–2261. 10.1002/anie.201508338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jp9b08531_si_001.pdf (813.1KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Physical Chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and Interfaces are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES