Skip to main content
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal logoLink to Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
. 2019 Nov;13(3):34–38. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1911.006

Arthrofibrosis Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

I Rushdi 1, S Sharifudin 1, A Shukur 1
PMCID: PMC6915315  PMID: 31890108

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a frequent injury and its reconstruction is among the most commonly performed orthopaedic surgical procedures. ACL reconstruction generally yields good results. However, its recovery can be hampered by the development of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to review complications following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction done in Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh and Hospital Teluk Intan, Perak with the emphasis on arthrofibrosis. Arthrofibrosis is defined as a loss of 15 degrees extension or more, with or without flexion loss compared to the contralateral knee.

Materials and Methods: The study is based on a series of retrospective cases, on which medical records of 200 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgeries between March 2007 and December 2014 were reviewed. Follow-up treatment records were available for 166 patients (83%). The data was analysed to identify the risk factors for developing complications with an emphasis on arthrofibrosis.

Results: Eight patients (5%) developed arthrofibrosis in the post-operative period. Early surgical intervention, preoperative limited range of motion and female gender are the risk factors correlate with arthrofibrosis. However, the type of graft used and meniscal procedure do not have a significant correlation with the development of arthrofibrosis. Other complications encountered are local infections, hypertrophic scar and chronic regional pain syndromes.

Conclusion: The 5% incidence of arthrofibrosis following an ACL reconstruction in our centres can be reduced with proper preventive measures which include thorough preoperative evaluation, proper patient selection, restoration of ROM prior to surgery and proper timing of surgery.

Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, complications, arthrofibrosis, pre-operative patient selection, postoperative rehabilitation

Introduction

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequent ligament to be injured in the knee joint1, 2, accounting for about 50% of all ligament injuries, and has an incidence of about 30 per 100,000 heads of population per year3. ACL reconstruction surgery is among the most frequent performed orthopaedic procedure and generally yields good results but patient recovery can be hampered by the development of post-operative complications4, 5.

General complications from ACL reconstruction surgery are wound problems, effusion, infections6 and venous thrombosis7. Complications specific to the patella tendon autograft are patella fracture and patella tendon rupture. Other complications are arthrofibrosis, patellofemoral pain, local tenderness8 and loss of sensitivity4.

There is no universally accepted definition of arthrofibrosis. Historically, arthrofibrosis can be defined as a loss of motion after a knee trauma or reconstructive surgery9, 10, 11. Based on literatures, its overall prevalence is about 4-38%12. Shelbourne and associates classified arthrofibrosis based on the pattern and severity of knee stiffness13 (Table I). Type 3 and 4 arthrofibrosis are indicated for surgical intervention.

Table I.

Classification of arthrofibrosis

TYPE EXTENSION FLEXION PATELLA MOBILITY
Type 1 <10° extension loss Normal flexion Normal
Type 2 >10° extension loss Normal flexion Normal
Type 3 >10° extension loss >25° flexion loss Decreases
Type 4 >10° extension loss >30° flexion loss Decrease and patella infera

Factors contribute to arthrofibrosis are genetic predisposition of the patient himself, types of injury such as multiple ligaments injury, dislocations, associated infection and synovitis. Surgical factors contributing to arthrofibrosis are timing of surgery, preoperative range of motion, malposition of graft, excessive graft tension, associated extra-articular procedure and meniscal repair. Post-operative factors such as prolonged immobilisation, poor rehabilitation, complicated with reflex sympathetic dystrophy, infections and synovitis can also contribute to arthrofibrosis14.

The main objective of our study was to review complications following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, done in Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh and Hospital Teluk Intan, Perak with the emphasis on arthrofibrosis.

Materials and Methods

Our study was an observational study of case series. Ethical clearance was obtained before reviewing patient records who underwent ACL reconstruction performed by the same surgeon from March 2007 till December 2014 in Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh and Hospital Teluk Intan, Perak, Malaysia.

Data compiled were demographic information, mechanism of injury, other associated injuries, timing of surgery, preoperative range of motion, graft chosen, post-operative range of motion, post-operative complications and other related procedures.

The collected data was then screened and filtered according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studied patients must fulfil several pre-operative selection criteria and were compliant to post-operative rehabilitation programmes. Exclusion criteria were patients who defaulted follow-up, had multi-ligamentous injuries and those who were complicated with post-operative infection or chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

Data was reviewed and analysed to identify the risk factors for developing arthrofibrosis. All surgeries were performed on patients who were under spinal or general anaesthesia. The ACL reconstruction was performed arthroscopically with autograft taken from hamstring or bone patella tendon bone graft. Hamstring graft was taken from ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendon prepared into two-strand graft or three-strand graft preparation depending on the length and diameter. Each end of graft was stitched together with a high strength of non-absorbable suture. All graft fixations used bio absorbable screws except the femoral fixations for the hamstrings grafts which were loaded with extracortical buttons. In addition, the graft tunnel contact was preserved at least 20mm in length.

Rehabilitation started immediately post-operative where the patient’s knee was put on knee brace locked in full extension. The knee was kept in full extension with the help of a pillow under the ankle. On day one post-operation, five exercises were taught to patients which include ankle pump exercise, passive quadriceps strengthening, straight leg raised, patella mobility and knee active-assisted ROM exercise. The knee was kept in full extension except during ROM exercises. The patient with no concomitant meniscal repair procedure was allowed to weight bear while the patient who had the meniscal repair procedure was instructed not to weight bear on the affected limb for six weeks. Strict instructions were given to our patients on early ROM exercise with the help of physiotherapy sessions. For patients with bone patella tendon bone graft, a rehabilitation protocol was adapted from the accelerated rehab protocol by Shelbone KD18 while patients with hamstring graft had to follow conventional rehabilitation programs10.

Post-operative follow-ups were scheduled starting from week 2, week 6, week 12 and after 6 months, post-operation. The range of motion was recorded at each interval. Our targeted ROM was 30° incremental every two weeks for both types of graft.

We classified a patient to have arthrofibrosis if there was an extension limitation of 10° or more with or without flexion and patella mobility limitation. At week six follow-up, if the targeted ROM of 90° flexion and < 5° extension lag were not observed, the patient would be subjected to aggressive physiotherapy sessions. If there was still no improvement at week 12, the patient would be subjected to arthrolysis.

Results

There were 200 recorded patients, on which 142 patients were from Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun and 58 patients from Hospital Teluk Intan. A total of 166 patients (83%) completed their follow ups. The mean age of our patients was 26 years, of which 154 (93%) were males. The most common cause of injury was sports injury (Table II). Arthrofibrosis was observed in eight out of 166 patients (4.8%) at week six of post-operative. At the time of surgery, three patients had pre-existing limitation motion of flexion (90°-110°) and extension lag (5°-15). All the three patients who went to surgery with a limited motion were complicated with arthrofibrosis. There were 12 female patients who had underwent ACL reconstruction surgeries. Two of them developed arthrofibrosis during week six post-operatively. The average time of surgery was at 3.4 months (3 months and 2 weeks) post injury with one patient underwent ACL reconstruction at two weeks post injury. A total of 110 patients in this study used hamstring graft while the remaining 56 patients used bone patella tendon bone (BPTB) graft. Five patients in the hamstring group (5%) and three in the BPTB group (5%) developed arthrofibrosis. One hundred five patients also underwent meniscal procedures apart from ACL reconstruction. Four of them developed arthrofibrosis (3.8%).

Table II.

Demographic data

Age (years, mean, range) 26 (18-45)
Sex
 Male 93% (154)
 Female 7% (12)
Race
 Malay 82%
 Indian 10%
 Chinese 7%
 Others 1%
Causes of injury
 Sport activity 73%

Patients who developed arthrofibrosis had to undergo aggressive physiotherapy sessions once arthrofibrosis was detected. Five of them were subjected to arthroscopic adhesiolysis and all restricted knee movements were resolved.

Discussion

In our study, three factors were found to be correlated with arthrofibrosis, namely pre-operative limited motion, the time of surgery and female patients. Three out of eight patients (37.5%) who developed arthrofibrosis went to surgery with pre-existing limited range of flexion motion (90°-110°) and extension lag (5°-15). Only these three patients were subjected to ACL reconstruction while their motions were limited and all of them had developed arthrofibrosis postoperatively (100%).

Our findings on the correlation between pre-operative range of motion and arthrofibrosis development were also observed by Quelard et al16. In their study, they found that limited pre-operative range of motion among other factors was found to be significantly correlated with delayed recovery. Mayr et al14 and Cosgarea et al17 observed the same correlation between limited pre-operative knee motion and stiffness after ACL reconstruction. Motion deficit was caused by high inflammatory changes in an acutely injured knee. They suggested that risk of arthrofibrosis was higher in cases of early ACL reconstruction of inflamed knee that usually presented with limited range of motion. Johnson et al20 also demonstrated that ROM recovery was slower when the ruptured ACL was associated with bone contusions which significantly related to limited post-operatively ROM.

The time of surgery also correlated to higher risk of arthrofibrosis as the only one patient who went to surgery at two weeks post injury developed arthrofibrosis while other cases which were done at average 3.4 months post injury has lower risk of developing arthrofibrosis.

Shelbourne et al10 stated that arthrofibrosis as a potential complication of acute ACL reconstruction. They did a retrospective study on 169 acute ACL reconstructions in a population of young athletes to determine the optimal time to perform acute ACL reconstruction with respect to arthrofibrosis. They found that delaying reconstructive surgery at least three weeks from the time of injury would result in earlier return of strength and more importantly, a significant decrease of arthrofibrosis incidence. The time of surgery as a correlating factor was also revealed by Quelard et al16 where they observed a high risk of difficult rehabilitation for patients undergoing surgery within 45 days of injury without having achieved full knee ROM (80% delayed recovery). Wasilewski et al15 had shared a similar finding, where they found the majority of arthrofibrosis occurred when surgeries were done on an acute knee and post-operatively motion recovery was significantly less for the ACL reconstruction in an acute phase.

In our study, two out of 12 female patients developed arthrofibrosis putting female patients who underwent ACL reconstruction to face higher risk of developing arthrofibrosis at 16%, higher than male patient which is at 4%. Our finding on the correlation between female patients with the risk of developing arthrofibrosis was also shown by Quelard et al16 but they could not explain the reason of the correlation. However, this correlation was opposed by Cosgarea et al17.

We also observed two other factors that were not correlated with the development of arthrofibrosis, namely type of graft used and concomitant meniscal procedure. Five out of 110 patients of the hamstring group (4.5%) developed arthrofibrosis similar to BPTB group where three out of 56 patients (5.3%) had similar complications. Four out of eight patients (50%) who developed arthrofibrosis also had concomitant meniscal procedure showing both groups had the same risks of developing the complications.

Splinder et al19 had similar findings on the type of graft choice. In his systematic review, he identified nine randomised controlled trials comparing many factors on successful outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. He found that graft type may not be the primary determinant for successful outcomes after an anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Cosgarea et al17 who studied the effects of concomitant meniscal procedure on the risk of developing arthrofibrosis post ACL reconstruction, has shared the same findings.

There are also studies on rehabilitation impact on arthrofibrosis post ACL reconstruction. Shelbourne et al18 studied the effects of an accelerated versus conventional rehabilitation program, while Noyes et al11 studied the effects of early range of motion. They found that early motion eliminated the significant risk of arthrofibrosis post ACL reconstruction.

Conclusion

Our seven years records of follow-up on arthrofibrosis post ACL reconstruction show that, factors that can be correlated with arthrofibrosis are pre-operative limited motion, the time of surgery and female patients. However, further study is needed to determine the association of these factors with arthrofibrosis.

With this limited observation, the incidence of arthrofibrosis following an ACL reconstruction can be further reduced with proper preventive measures which include thorough preoperative evaluation, proper patient selection, restoration of ROM prior to surgery and proper timing of surgery.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Gianotti SM. Marshall SW. Hume PA. Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(6):622–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Janssen KW. Orchard JW. Driscoll TR. van Mechelen W. High incidence and costs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed in Australia from 2003-2004 to 2007-2008: time for an anterior cruciate ligament register by Scandinavian model? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22(40):495–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Buller LT. Best MJ. Baraga MG. Kaplan LD. Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;3(1):2325967114563664. doi: 10.1177/2325967114563664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.St. Pierre P. Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery. Sports Medic and Arthrosc. 2004;1293:185–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vergis A. Gillquist J. Graft failure in intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a review of the literature. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(3):312–21. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Matava MJ. Evans TA. Wright RW. Shively RA. Septic arthritis of the knee following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results of a survey of sports medicine fellowship directors. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(7):717–25. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70098-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jaureguito JW. Greenwald AE. Wilcox JF. Paulos LE. Rosenberg TD. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis after arthroscopic knee surgery. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(6):707–10. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270060401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Finsterbush A. Frankl U. Matan Y. Mann G. Secondary Damage to the Knee after Isolated Injury of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(5):475–9. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sprague NF. O’Connor RL. Fox JM. Arthroscopic Treatment of Postoperative Fibroarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(166):165–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shelbourne KD. Wilckens JH. Mollabashy A. DeCarlo M. Arthrofibrosis in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. The Effect of Timing of Reconstruction and Rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(4):332–6. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Noyes FR. Berrios-Torres S. Barber-Westin SD. Heckman TP. Prevention of permanent arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alone or combined with associated procedures: a prospective study in 443 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(4):196–206. doi: 10.1007/s001670000126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ekhtiari S. Horner NS. SA D. Simunovic N. Hirschmann MT. Ogilvie R et al. Arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction is best treated in a step-wise approach with early recognition and intervention: a systematic review. Knee Surgery Sports Trauma Arthosc. 2017;25(12):3929–37. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4482-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shelbourne KD. Payel DV. Martini DJ. Classification and management of arthrofibrosis of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(6):857–62. doi: 10.1177/036354659602400625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mayr HO. Weig TG. Plitz W. Arthrofibrosis following ACL reconstruction--reasons and outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(8):518–22. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0718-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wasilewski SA. Covall DJ. Cohen S. Effect of surgical timing on recovery and associated injuries after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(3):338–42. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Quelard B. Sonnery-Cottet B. Zayni R. Preoperative Factors Correlating with Prolonged Range of Motion Deficit after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010 doi: 10.1177/0363546510370198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cosgarea AJ. Sebastianelli WJ. DeHaven KE. Prevention of arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the central third patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(1):87–92. doi: 10.1177/036354659502300115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shelbourne KD. Nitz P. Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(3):292–9. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Spindler KP. Kuhn JE. Freedman KB. Matthews CE. Dittus RS. Harell FE Jr. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: Bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: Does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1986–95. doi: 10.1177/0363546504271211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Johnson DL. Bealle DP. Brand JC Jr. Nyland J. Caborn DN. The effect of a geographic lateral bone bruise on knee inflammation after acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(2):152–5. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280020301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal are provided here courtesy of Malaysian Orthopedic Association

RESOURCES