Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2019 Nov 6;95(6):1517–1522. doi: 10.1111/jfb.14162

A pilot study of the performance of captive‐reared delta smelt Hypomesus transpacificus in a semi‐natural environment

Tien‐Chieh Hung 1,✉, Marlin Rosales 1, Tomofumi Kurobe 2, Troy Stevenson 1, Luke Ellison 1, Galen Tigan 1, Marade Sandford 1, Chelsea Lam 2, Andrew Schultz 3, Swee Teh 2
PMCID: PMC6916271  PMID: 31613989

Abstract

A captive breeding programme was developed in 2008 for delta smelt Hypomesus transpacificus in reaction to dramatic population decline over several decades. We took 526 sub‐adult captive‐reared delta smelt and cultured them for 200 days without providing artificial food or water quality management to assess their performance once released in the wild. The results indicated captive‐reared sub‐adult delta smelt could survive in a semi‐natural environment with uncontrolled water quality and naturally produced wild prey through spawning and into their post spawning phase.

Keywords: captive, delta smelt, refuge population, reintroduction, semi‐natural environment

1.

Multiple factors have affected aquatic organisms in the San Francisco Estuary since the first European settlement, including habitat alteration, water diversions, flow regime alterations and introduction of exotic species (Bennett & Moyle, 1996; Brown & Moyle, 2005; Moyle et al., 2010; Moyle, Katz et al., 2011; Sommer et al., 2007). Several species native to the Estuary are now listed as threatened or endangered under state or federal status, including delta smelt Hypomesus transpacificus, which is federally listed as threatened (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1993), endangered under the California Endangered Species Act (CDFW, 2017) and Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List (NatureServe, 2014). There is growing concern delta smelt will face extinction in the next 2–10 years (Moyle et al., 2018).

Delta smelt are an annual osmerid fish endemic to the San Francisco Estuary (Moyle, 2002) with silver‐like colour and an adult fork length (L F) of 65–90 mm (Moyle et al., 2018). They are a life‐long zooplanktivore, consuming larger prey as they grow (Feyrer et al., 2003; Lott, 1998; Mager et al., 2003; Moyle et al., 1992; Nobriga, 2002). Delta smelt have gained attention over the past decade, as their principal habitat has been caught in a battle between protecting natural aquatic resources and providing Californians with ample water (Bennett, 2005; Moyle et al., 2018; Sommer et al., 2007). In an effort to begin curtailing their potential extinction, a captive refuge population of delta smelt was established at the Fish Conservation and Culture Laboratory (FCCL), University of California, Davis, in 2008 (Israel et al., 2011; Lindberg et al., 2013). The primary goals of the FCCL are to maintain a refuge population of delta smelt onsite and provide all life stages of delta smelt to academic institutions and governmental agencies for research purposes.

It is challenging to maintain a genetically sound population in captivity with the intention of releasing them into the wild (Crawford & Muir, 2008). Conservation hatcheries strive to slow inevitable evolutionary processes associated with captivity such as genetic or phenotypic changes while capturing, housing and breeding of a species (Finger et al., 2017). At the FCCL, culture methods for delta smelt are continuously being improved through research and experimentation. Adults are genetically tested to create a pedigree to determine crossings of least related individuals and to keep equal representation among families with wild‐caught delta smelt added into the breeding pool annually (Finger et al., 2018; Lindberg et al., 2013). However, all of these efforts to minimise kinship and keep the genetics of the cultured population as close as possible to the wild do not guarantee success as a recent study found the relative reproductive success of pair crosses with at least one wild delta smelt parent was lower than the ones with two cultured parents (Finger et al., 2017).

Other problems may arise when trying to raise fish in a controlled system for future release into the wild. Fish reared and released for the purpose of rehabilitating populations have been housed in predator‐free conventional hatchery environments with plenty of food, allowing better survival through the earliest life stages than nature does. However, these early rearing stages experiences do little to prepare the fish for life outside captivity (Brown & Day, 2002; Salvanes & Braithwaite, 2006). In addition, the ability of captive delta smelt to survive outside captivity is still unknown and warrants investigation (Hobbs et al., 2017; Israel et al., 2011). Consequently, the main goals of this study were to see if captive‐reared delta smelt can: (a) learn to find natural prey on their own; (b) forage on natural prey effectively enough to maintain a similar body condition to fish in captivity; (c) have similar survival foraging on natural prey as the control fish reared in the captive environment at the FCCL.

We used 526 sub‐adult (297 days post hatch; dph) delta smelt that were the ninth generation (F9) removed from the wild at the FCCL. All fish were tagged 7 days prior to the study with visible implant alphanumeric (VIA) tags (Sandford, Castillo, & Hung, 2019; Northwest Marine Technologies; http://www.nmt.us). On December 5, 2016, fish were placed into a large trough (length = 7.11 m, width = 2.29 m, depth = 0.81 m) located in the FCCL yard. The fish holding area of the trough was fitted with a bird net (mesh size = 2 cm) to prevent predation by birds. The trough ran flow‐through raw water from the California aqueduct, and a stainless steel screen, with openings of 13 cm long and 0.3 cm wide, was placed at the inlet to screen out predators. The incoming water and water in the fish holding area were tested twice per week for pH (PHC201, Hach; http://www.hach.com), salinity (YSI85, YSI; http://www.ysi.com), turbidity (MicroTPW, HF Scientific; http://www.watts.com), dissolved oxygen (LDO101, Hach), total ammonia nitrogen, nitrite–nitrogen and nitrate‐nitrogen (DR3900, Hach). Temperature was continuously monitored and logged once per hour (HOBO Water Temp Pro v2, Onset; http://www.onsetcomp.com).

The trough was siphoned daily and the screens checked for any pinned mortalities. Once a week, 15 arbitrary fish were sampled and anesthetised using 0.1% MS‐222 before wet mass (M T, g) and L F (cm) were measured and sexual maturity determined. A set of 20 fish cultured under laboratory culture conditions (Lindberg et al., 2013) were marked and sampled repeatedly during the trial as the control group. The control group were maintained indoors and fed a commercial diet (BioVita CRUM #1, Bio‐Oregon; http://www.bio-oregon.com). Fulton's condition factor (K) was calculated using the equation: K = 100M T L T −3 (Froese, 2006; Fulton, 1904). After the study terminated on day 199, the trough was drained and all remaining fish in the holding area were collected and identified.

Gut contents of dead fish were collected and pooled monthly, preserved with ethanol (200 proof, Koptec, King of Prussia, PA) and used for identification of prey items by shotgun metagenomic sequencing analysis (Kurobe et al., 2018; Jovel et al., 2016). After quality trimming and concatenating pair‐end sequences, we obtained a total of 15 million DNA sequences with an average length of 398 bp for the six libraries (Supporting Information Table S1). Relative abundances for five categories of organisms (see Table 1 for each classification) were then estimated by counting the number of DNA sequences at the phylum or class level. Detailed taxonomic information was retrieved using a package taxize in R (Chamberlain & Szöcs, 2013; http://www.r-project.org). DNA sequences from bacteria were not included for estimating their relative abundance since fish also have gastrointestinal microflora (Wang et al., 2018). In addition, delta smelt are zooplanktivores and bacteria are not their primary diets (Moyle et al., 1992). Similarly, DNA sequences which show similarity to fishes were not included for the analysis since DNA from hosts were expected in the gut contents (Vestheim & Jarman, 2008). Rare taxa, defined as a percentage of DNA sequences less than 0.5% of the total, were not included in the table to conserve space.

The survival of delta smelt was high (81.2%) throughout the first 160 days and was similar to the control group (Figure 1a). Initial mortalities (3.6%) that occurred within 72 h after transportation were considered to be caused by handling stress. The survival trend for cultured fish in a semi‐natural environment was similar to the survival of the control group, but a large die‐off occurred in the trough between days 197 and 200, which led to the termination of the study. The recovery of delta smelt in this study was 47.1%. Changes in K of all fish are shown in Figure 1b. Compared with the control fish, the K of the test fish decreased dramatically during the first three samplings (21 days post release) and continued to decline until day 98. The condition factors bounced back to only 0.04 less than the level at day 0 before declining again from day 140. In addition, on day 161, 11 of the 15 fish sampled showed signs of parasite infestation by white‐spot disease Ichthyophthirius multifiliis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Survival of cultured delta smelt Hypomesus transpacificus in semi‐natural environment and fully controlled environment (Inline graphic) Study fish (all), (Inline graphic) Study fish (handled within 1 week excluded), and (Inline graphic) Control fish). (b) Mean (± SD) condition Fulton factor changes (ΔK) of sampled fish compared with the same fish at the beginning of the study (Inline graphic) Study fish and (Inline graphic) Control fish

The turbidity experienced by delta smelt in the trough was much higher (up to 80 NTU) than the turbidity they had experienced previously, showing that captive reared delta smelt can survive in turbidity higher than they experienced in captivity. Various types of organisms were detected in the gut of delta smelt, and their relative abundances changed over time (Table 1). Zooplankton was the major taxon (73.4%) in January, which included copepods, daphnia, amphipods and other taxa. The relative abundance of zooplankton decreased in later months and was replaced with worms (e.g., Nematoda and Platyhelminthes) and insects (e.g., mosquitoes, midges, and fries). Higher percentages of cyanobacteria and phytoplankton were observed in June compared with earlier months. These findings show delta smelt were able to find and consume natural prey in the trough, answering our first question of the study.

Table 1.

Composition (%) of Hypomesus transpacificus gut contents by phylum, class and aggregate totals, as derived from shotgun metagenomic sequencing analysis

Classification Phylum Class January March April May June
Cyanobacteria n/a 4.9 4.6 0.4 1.9 23.2
Arthropoda Insecta 11.5 43.6 40.5 4.9 25.5
Bacillariophyta Mediophyceae 2.0 4.1 0.1 0.0 26.5
Chlorophyta Chlorophyceae 1.8 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.1
Euglenida n/a 0.1 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0
Total phytoplankton 3.9 4.6 8.3 0.6 26.6
Annelida Clitellata 2.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
Nematoda Chromadorea 2.8 25.2 4.8 58.6 0.9
Platyhelminthes Cestoda 0.8 2.3 0.8 14.8 0.3
Platyhelminthes Trematoda 0.6 6.0 1.0 10.5 0.2
Total worms 6.3 33.5 6.7 83.9 1.5
Arthropoda Branchiopoda 45.8 4.1 39.6 2.5 7.0
Arthropoda Hexanauplia 0.8 8.3 4.1 4.3 0.6
Arthropoda Malacostraca 18.0 1.4 0.3 1.2 15.7
Arthropoda Ostracoda 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0
Total zooplankton 73.4 13.8 44 8.6 23.3
Open in a new tab

Note: n/a: Not available.

Even though samples of the water were not tested to see what organisms were present for delta smelt to choose from, Nobriga (2002) stated larval delta smelt feeding success was related directly to prey abundance. We therefore assumed the highest numbers of prey ingested are what was present in the highest numbers in the trough. Nobriga (2002) also stated that delta smelt mouth width increased continuously throughout the larval period, allowing for ingestion of larger prey. This is reflected in the sub‐adult smelt as well as they moved on from purely zooplankton to organisms that are larger, like insects.

The condition factor of delta smelt fluctuated throughout the duration of the study, possibly due to being moved into a semi‐natural environment instead of being in a stable laboratory environment. Olla et al. (1998) points out that a hatchery provides a plentiful supply of highly nutritious pellets, so there is little need for the cultured fish to actively search for food. Once released, the fish must learn to capture live prey, a task that many fish fail to master (Brown & Day, 2002; Ellis et al., 2005; Ersbak & Haase, 1983). The initial decline in fish K could be caused by starvation due to the termination of artificial feeding. Their fat storage from the dry feed could have served as an energy source as they physiologically adjusted to new prey items throughout the course of the study. The presence of predators in the trough could also have led to the decline. Hatchery‐reared fish generally fail to avoid predators and consequently, suffer higher mortality rates (Brown & Day, 2002; Weber & Fausch, 2001). We tried to minimise the effects of predators but a red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkia (carapace length of 6 cm), > 50 prickly sculpin Cottus asper (standard lengths up to 8 cm) and several shimofuri goby Tridentiger bifasciatus (standard lengths up to 7 cm) were found in the trough at the end of the study. We assume they entered the trough as larvae through the screen openings and contributed to some of the mortality of delta smelt, but we did not verify this by dissection any of the predators to look for remains of delta smelt.

Changes in the environment (Hammock et al., 2017) due to temperature or turbidity could also be causes of the decline in body condition. Hasenbein et al. (2013) found that turbidity significantly affected juvenile delta smelt's feeding performance, finding the highest feeding rates occurred at low turbidity (<12 NTU). Condition factors could also be influenced by suitable water temperature (Brown et al., 2013). Temperature steadily increased from December to July, ranging from 7.7 to 27.8°C. The temperature reached 27°C at the end of the study, which is the thermal maximum for adult delta smelt (Komoroske et al., 2014; Swanson et al., 2000) and could have caused a quick die‐off of the fish in the trough. In addition, flow rate has been shown to have an effect on the condition factor of other species of fish including white perch Morone Americana (Gmelin 1789), yellow perch Perca flavescens (Mitchill 1814) and channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque 1818) by providing sufficient prey items for fish to consume (Weisberg & Burton, 1993). In this study, the flow velocity in the trough was much slower than the flow in a round tank (control), but a water turnover rate of every 8.2 min was achieved.

Previous studies have shown that cultured fish have a low return rate, meaning that they do not survive as well as their wild counterparts (Jonsson & Jonsson, 2014; Kallio‐Nyberg et al., 2011; Miller et al., 2014). There are various factors that can contribute to their survivability after release including predation (Jonsson & Jonsson, 2006), domestication (Huntingford, 2004), interspecific competition (Houde et al., 2017; Miyasaka et al., 2003; Mookerji et al., 2004), food availability (Kallio‐Nyberg et al., 2011), health and composition of the environment (Crawford & Muir, 2008; Serrano et al., 2009), bodily makeup of the fish (Serrano et al., 2009), their athleticism (Zhang et al., 2016), size and age (Irvine et al., 2013).

The survival rate started to decline after 160 days, possibly due to the fish sexually maturing and spawning. Based on the author's experience and previous studies, the females were usually weak and easily susceptible to disease after a spawning event (Bennett, 2005). Ripe eggs in the collected fish corpses were observed as early as 105 days post release (20 March). The temperature in March was still low (<15°C), which helped the fish to stabilise and recover. Female delta smelt take about 40 to 50 days to produce another clutch of eggs (unpubl. data), but this time, an increase in temperature (c. 20°C) and multiple spawning events resulted in higher mortality. This increase in mortality was expected and the trend was similar to the control fish. Other causes of mortality, like the temperature spike at the end of the study and the presence of predators in the trough, combined with the natural mortality delta smelt experience after spawning are all possible factors that contributed to the massive die off that ended our study.

Since hatchery and wild fish grow up in very different environments, differential experience is likely to generate behavioural differences (Brown & Day, 2002). Behaviours learnt early in life are likely to influence behaviour at later stages. Hence, deficiencies generated in early life are likely to affect later success (Salvanes & Braithwaite, 2006). Salvanes and Braithwaite (2005) showed juvenile Atlantic cod Gadus morhua L. 1758 benefit from experiencing a spatial landscape during the hatchery‐rearing phase, in that they develop flexible behaviour and are capable of enhanced social interactions. This idea would lend itself in the next set of experiments towards releasing delta smelt. If we could increase the complexity of the captive environment for delta smelt, then they might have greater survival if released. There are studies illustrating how simple enrichment of the rearing environment affects learning ability, foraging skills, social behaviour, predator avoidance, aggression and reproductive success (Berejikian et al., 2000; Salvanes & Braithwaite, 2005; Brown et al., 2003; Fleming et al., 1997).

Araki et al. (2009) found subsequent generations of founding fish raised in captivity continue to be of detrimental influence on their fitness. Nevertheless, captive breeding programmes have improved over time, employing the most practical methods that take into consideration the importance of maintaining genetic variation within the population, management of epizootic outbreaks across the hatchery, suitable rearing practices for all life stages and reducing effects of domestication (Lorenzen et al., 2012; Rowland, 2013). Releasing captive‐reared delta smelt along with regulations that protect the fish species in the wild could help mitigate population decline in nature (Jutila et al., 2003) and this study demonstrated if delta smelt were raised in captivity to near‐adulthood and then either fully liberated or released into field enclosures, the fish would learn to feed themselves and potentially survive in the wild.

Developing policies that allow for in situ experiments using cultured delta smelt appears to be a precursor for advancing policies that might allow supplementation actions. Lessard et al. (2018) highlight the importance of moving forward to develop a viable and testable supplementation programme for delta smelt conservation. This study is one step in that direction providing information needed to proceed with studies and hopefully 1 day the release of cultured delta smelt into the wild and keep this species from extinction.

Supporting information

Table S1. Summary for the sequencing output and annotation for the shotgun metagenomic sequencing analysis of Hypomesus transpacificus gut contents.

Click here for additional data file. (18KB, docx)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the FCCL staff who sampled the fish weekly and maintained the trough on a daily basis throughout this study. We also thank Reyes R. at U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Afentoulis V. at California Department of Water Resources and Pickard D. at California State University, Chico for the help on the identification of aquatic animal species and Chan C. and Berry K. at Aquatic Health Program, University of California, Davis for genomic DNA extraction and data analysis for shotgun metagenomic sequencing analysis. The sequencing reaction for the shotgun metagenomic sequencing analysis was carried out at the DNA Technologies and Expression Analysis Cores at the UC Davis Genome Center, supported by NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant 1S10OD010786‐01.

Hung T‐C, Rosales M, Kurobe T, et al. A pilot study of the performance of captive‐reared delta smelt Hypomesus transpacificus in a semi‐natural environment. J Fish Biol. 2019;95:1517–1522. 10.1111/jfb.14162

Funding information U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Grant/Award Number: R15AN20003; National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: 1S10OD010786‐01

REFERENCES

  1. Araki, H. , Cooper, B. , & Blouin, M. S. (2009). Carry‐over effect of captive breeding reduces reproductive fitness of wild‐born decedents in the wild. Biology Letters, 5, 621–624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett, W. A. (2005). Critical assessment of the delta smelt population in the San Francisco estuary, California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 3, 1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, W. A. , & Moyle, P. B. (1996). Where have all the fishes gone? Interactive factors producing fish declines in the Sacramento‐San Joaquin estuary In Hollibaugh J. T. (Ed.), San Francisco Bay: The ecosystem (pp. 519–542). San Francisco, CA: Pacific Division, AAAS. [Google Scholar]
  4. Berejikian, B. A. , Tezak, E. P. , Flagg, T. A. , LaRae, A. L. , Kummerow, E. , & Mahnken, C. V. W. (2000). Social dominance, growth and habitat use of age‐0 steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) grown in enriched and conventional hatchery rearing environments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57, 628–636. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, C. , Davidson, T. , & Laland, K. (2003). Environmental enrichment and prior experience of live prey improve foraging behavior in hatchery‐reared Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology, 63, 187–196. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, C. , & Day, R. L. (2002). The future of stock enhancements: lessons for hatchery practice from conservation biology. Fish and Fisheries, 3, 79–94. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, L. R. , Bennett, W. A. , Wagner, R. W. , Morgan‐King, T. , Knowles, N. , Feyrer, F. , … Dettinger, M. (2013). Implications for future survival of delta smelt from four climate change scenarios for the Sacramento–san Joaquin Delta, California. Estuaries and Coasts, 36, 754–774. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, L. R. , & Moyle, P. B. (2005). Native Fishes of the Sacramento–San Joaquin Drainage, California: A History of Decline In American Fisheries Society Symposium (Vol. 45, pp. 75–98). Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70199490 [Google Scholar]
  9. CDFW . (2017). State and federally listed endangered and threatened animals of California. North Highlands, CA: California Department of Fish and Wildlife, The Natural Resources Agency. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chamberlain, S. A. , & Szöcs, E. (2013). Taxize ‐ taxonomic search and retrieval in R. F1000Research, 2, 191 http://f1000research.com/articles/2-191/v2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crawford, S. S. , & Muir, A. M. (2008). Global introductions of salmon and trout in the genus Oncorhynchus: 1870‐2007. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 18, 313–344. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, T. , Hughes, R. N. , & Howell, B. R. (2005). Artificial dietary regime may impair subsequent foraging behavior of hatchery‐reared turbot released into the natural environment. Journal of Fish Biology, 61, 252–264. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ersbak, K. , & Haase, B. L. (1983). Nutritional deprivation after stocking as a possible mechanism leading to mortality in stream‐stocked brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 3, 142–151. [Google Scholar]
  14. Feyrer, F. , Herbold, B. , Matern, S. A. , & Moyle, P. B. (2003). Dietary shifts in a stressful fish assemblage: Consequences of a bivalve invasion in the San Francisco estuary. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 67, 277–288. [Google Scholar]
  15. Finger, A. J. , Mahardja, B. , Fisch, K. M. , Benjamin, A. , Lindberg, J. , Ellison, L. , … May, B. (2018). A conservation hatchery population of delta smelt shows evidence of genetic adaptation to captivity after 9 generations. Journal of Heredity, 109, 689–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Finger, A. J. , Schumer, G. , Benjamin, A. , & Blankenship, S. (2017). Evaluation and interpretation of genetic rffective population size of delta smelt from 2011–2014. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 15, 5. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fleming, I. A. , Lamberg, A. , & Jonsson, B. (1997). Effects of early experience on the reproductive performance of Atlantic salmon. Behavioural Ecology, 8, 470–480. [Google Scholar]
  18. Froese, R. (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight–length relationships: History, meta‐analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22, 241–253. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fulton, T. W. (1904). The rate of growth of fishes 22nd Annual Report of the Fisheries Board of Scotland, 1903, 141–241). [Google Scholar]
  20. Hasenbein, M. , Komoroske, L. M. , Connon, R. E. , Geist, J. , & Fangue, N. A. (2013). Turbidity and salinity affect feeding performance and physiological stress in the endangered delta smelt. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 53, 620–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hammock, B. G. , Slater, S. B. , Baxter, R. D. , Fangue, N. A. , Cocherell, D. , Hennessy, A. , … Teh, S. J. (2017). Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi‐anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish. PLoS One, 12, e0173497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hobbs, J. A. , Moyle, P. B. , Fangue, N. , & Connon, R. E. (2017). Is extinction inevitable for delta smelt and longfin smelt? An opinion and recommendations for recovery. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 15(2). [Google Scholar]
  23. Houde, A. L. , Wilson, C. C. , & Neff, B. D. (2017). Performance of four salmonids species in competition with Atlantic salmon. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 43, 211–215. [Google Scholar]
  24. Huntingford, F. A. (2004). Implications of domestication and rearing conditions for the behaviour of cultivated fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 65, 122–142. [Google Scholar]
  25. Irvine, J. R. , O'Neill, M. , Godbout, L. , & Schnute, J. (2013). Effects of smolt release timing and size on the survival of hatchery‐origin coho salmon in the strait of Georgia. Progress in Oceanography, 115, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  26. Israel, J. A. , Fisch, K. M. , Turner, T. F. , & Waples, R. S. (2011). Conservation of native fishes of the San Francisco estuary: Considerations for artificial propagation of Chinook salmon, delta smeltand green sturgeon. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 9, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jonsson, B. , & Jonsson, N. (2006). Cultured Atlantic salmon in nature: A review of their ecology and interaction with wild fish. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63, 1162–1181. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jonsson, B. , & Jonsson, N. (2014). Naturally and hatchery produced European trout Salmo trutta: Do their marine survival and dispersal differ? Journal of Coastal Conservation, 18, 79–87. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jovel, J. , Patterson, J. , Wang, W. , Hotte, N. , O'Keefe, S. , Mitchel, T. , … Wong, G. K. (2016). Characterization of the gut microbiome using 16S or shotgun metagenomics. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jutila, E. , Jokikokko, E. , & Julkunen, M. (2003). Management of Atlantic salmon in the Simojoki River, northern Gulf of Bothnia: Effects of stocking and fishing regulation. Fisheries Research, 64, 5–17. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kallio‐Nyberg, I. , Saloniemi, I. , Jutila, E. , & Jokikokko, E. (2011). Effect of hatchery rearing and environmental factors on the survival, growth and migration of Atlantic salmon in the Baltic Sea. Fisheries Research, 109, 285–294. [Google Scholar]
  32. Komoroske, L. M. , Connon, R. E. , Lindberg, J. , Cheng, B. S. , Castillo, G. , Hasenbein, M. , & Fangue, N. A. (2014). Ontogeny influences sensitivity to climate change stressors in an endangered fish. Conservation Physiology, 2, cou008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kurobe, T. , Lehman, P. W. , Hammock, B. G. , Bolotaolo, M. B. , Lesmeister, S. , & Teh, S. J. (2018). Biodiversity of cyanobacteria and other aquatic microorganisms across a freshwater to brackish water gradient determined by shotgun metagenomic sequencing analysis in the San Francisco estuary, USA. PLoS One, 13, e0203953 10.1371/journal.pone.0203953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lessard, J. , Cavallo, B. , Anders, P. , Sommer, T. , Schreier, B. , Gille, D. , … Clarke, R. (2018). Considerations for the use of captive‐reared delta smelt for species recovery and research. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 16(3). [Google Scholar]
  35. Lindberg, J. C. , Tigan, G. , Ellison, L. , Rettinghouse, T. , Nagel, M. M. , & Fisch, K. M. (2013). Aquaculture methods for a genetically managed population of endangered delta smelt. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 75, 186–196. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lorenzen, K. , Beveridge, M. C. , & Mangel, M. (2012). Cultured fish: Integrative biology and management of domestication and interactions with wild fish. Biological Reviews, 87, 639–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lott, J. (1998). Feeding habits of juvenile and adult delta smelt from the Sacramento‐San Joaquin River estuary. Interagency ecological program for the Sacramento‐San Joaquin estuary. IEP Newsletter, 11, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mager, R. C. , Doroshov, S. I. , van Eenennaam, J. P. , & Brown, R. L. (2003). Early life stages of delta smelt In Feyrer F., Brown L. R., & Orsi J. J. (Eds.), Early life history of fishes in the San Francisco Estuary and watershed. Symposium 39 (pp. 169–180). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society. [Google Scholar]
  39. Miller, L. M. , Ward, M. C. , & Schreiner, D. R. (2014). Reduced reproductive success of hatchery fish from a supplementation program for naturalized steelhead in a Minnesota tributary to Lake Superior. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 40, 994–1001. [Google Scholar]
  40. Miyasaka, H. , Nakano, S. , & Furukawa‐Tanaka, T. (2003). Food habit divergence between white‐spotted charr and masu salmon in Japanese mountain streams; circumstantial evidence for competition. Limnology, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mookerji, N. , Weng, Z. , & Mazumder, A. (2004). Food partitioning between coexisting Atlantic salmon and brook trout in the Sainte‐Marguerite ecosystem Quebec. Journal of Fish Biology, 64, 80–694. [Google Scholar]
  42. Moyle, P. B. (2002). Inland fisheries of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  43. Moyle, P. B. , Bennett, W. A. , Fleenor, W. E. , & Lund, J. R. (2010). Habitat variability and complexity in the upper San Francisco estuary. Online San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 8. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moyle, P. B. , Herbold, B. , Stevens, D. E. , & Miller, L. W. (1992). Life history and status of delta smelt in the Sacramento‐San Joaquin estuary California. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 121, 67–77. [Google Scholar]
  45. Moyle, P. B. , Hobbs, J. A. , & Durand, J. R. (2018). Delta smelt and water politics in California. Fisheries, 43, 43–60. [Google Scholar]
  46. Moyle, P. B. , Katz, J. V. E. , & Quiñonez, R. M. (2011). Rapid decline of California's native inland fishes: A status assessment. Biological Conservation, 144, 2414–2423. [Google Scholar]
  47. NatureServe 2014. Hypomesus transpacificus The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T10722A18229095. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014-3.RLTS.T10722A18229095.en. Downloaded on October 10, 2019 [DOI]
  48. Nobriga, M. L. (2002). Larval delta smelt diet composition and feeding incidence: Environmental and ontogenetic influences. California Fish Game, 88, 149–164. [Google Scholar]
  49. Olla, B. L. , Davis, M. W. , & Ryer, C. H. (1998). Understanding how the hatchery environment represses or promotes the development of behavioral survival skills. Bulletin of Marine Science, 62, 531–550. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rowland, S. J. (2013). Hatchery production for conservation and stock enhancement: The case of Australian freshwater fish In Advances in aquaculture hatchery technology. Cambridge, MA: Woodhead Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  51. Salvanes, A. G. V. , & Braithwaite, V. (2005). Exposure to variable spatial information in the early rearing environment generates asymmetries in social interactions in cod (Gadus morhua). Behavioural Ecology Social Biology, 59, 250–257. [Google Scholar]
  52. Sandford, M. , Castillo, G. , & Hung, T. C. (2019). A review of fish identification methods applied on small fish. Rev Aquacult, 1–13. 10.1111/raq.12339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Salvanes, A. G. V. , & Braithwaite, V. (2006). The need to understand the behaviour of fish reared for mariculture or restocking. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63, 346–354. [Google Scholar]
  54. Serrano, I. , Larsson, S. , & Eriksson, L. O. (2009). Migration performance of wild and hatchery sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) smolts‐implications for compensatory hatchery programs. Fisheries Research, 99, 2010–2015. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sommer, T. , Armor, C. , Baxter, R. , Breuer, R. , Brown, L. , Chotkowski, M. , … Souza, K. (2007). The collapse of pelagic fishes in the upper San Francisco estuary. Fisheries, 32, 270–277. [Google Scholar]
  56. Swanson, C. , Reid, T. , Young, P. S. , & Cech, J. J., Jr. (2000). Comparative environmental tolerances of threatened delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) and introduced wakasagi (H. nipponensis) in an altered California estuary. Oecologia, 123, 384–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service) . (1993). Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Determination of threatened status for the delta smelt (p. 58). Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Register. [Google Scholar]
  58. Vestheim, H. , & Jarman, S. N. (2008). Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples ‐ a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs. Frontiers in Zoology, 5, 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, A. R. , Ran, C. , Ringø, E. , & Zhou, Z. G. (2018). Progress in fish gastrointestinal microbiota research. Reviews in Aquaculture, 10, 626–640. [Google Scholar]
  60. Weber, E. D. , & Fausch, K. D. (2001). Interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids in streams: Differences in biology and evidence for competition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 60, 1018–1036. [Google Scholar]
  61. Weisberg, S. B. , & Burton, W. H. (1993). Enhancement of fish feeding and growth after an increase in minimum flow below the Conowingo dam. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 13, 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhang, Y. , Timmerhaus, G. , Anttila, K. , Mauduit, F. , Jorgensen, S. M. , Kristensen, T. , … Farrell, A. P. (2016). Domestication compromises athleticism and respiratory plasticity in response to aerobic exercise training in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture, 463, 79–88. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Summary for the sequencing output and annotation for the shotgun metagenomic sequencing analysis of Hypomesus transpacificus gut contents.

Click here for additional data file. (18KB, docx)

Articles from Journal of Fish Biology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES