Skip to main content
BMC Plant Biology logoLink to BMC Plant Biology
. 2019 Dec 16;19:553. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2015-4

Haplotype block analysis of an Argentinean hexaploid wheat collection and GWAS for yield components and adaptation

Silvana Marisol Luján Basile 1,#, Ignacio Abel Ramírez 2,#, Juan Manuel Crescente 3,4, Maria Belén Conde 3, Melina Demichelis 3, Pablo Abbate 2, William John Rogers 1,4, Ana Clara Pontaroli 2,4, Marcelo Helguera 3, Leonardo Sebastián Vanzetti 3,4,
PMCID: PMC6916457  PMID: 31842779

Abstract

Background

Increasing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production is required to feed a growing human population. In order to accomplish this task a deeper understanding of the genetic structure of cultivated wheats and the detection of genomic regions significantly associated with the regulation of important agronomic traits are necessary steps. To better understand the genetic basis and relationships of adaptation and yield related traits, we used a collection of 102 Argentinean hexaploid wheat cultivars genotyped with the 35k SNPs array, grown from two to six years in three different locations. Based on SNPs data and gene-related molecular markers, we performed a haplotype block characterization of the germplasm and a genome-wide association study (GWAS).

Results

The genetic structure of the collection revealed four subpopulations, reflecting the origin of the germplasm used by the main breeding programs in Argentina. The haplotype block characterization showed 1268 blocks of different sizes spread along the genome, including highly conserved regions like the 1BS chromosome arm where the 1BL/1RS wheat/rye translocation is located. Based on GWAS we identified ninety-seven chromosome regions associated with heading date, plant height, thousand grain weight, grain number per spike and fruiting efficiency at harvest (FEh). In particular FEh stands out as a promising trait to raise yield potential in Argentinean wheats; we detected fifteen haplotypes/markers associated with increased FEh values, eleven of which showed significant effects in all three evaluated locations. In the case of adaptation, the Ppd-D1 gene is consolidated as the main determinant of the life cycle of Argentinean wheat cultivars.

Conclusion

This work reveals the genetic structure of the Argentinean hexaploid wheat germplasm using a wide set of molecular markers anchored to the Ref Seq v1.0. Additionally GWAS detects chromosomal regions (haplotypes) associated with important yield and adaptation components that will allow improvement of these traits through marker-assisted selection.

Keywords: Wheat, Haplotype, GWAS, Heading date, Plant height, Thousand grain weight, Grain number per spike, Fruiting efficiency at harvest

Background

World population is projected to grow to nearly 10 billion by 2050 and more than 11 billion by 2100 and, on a global scale, agriculture expansion has slowed down and production increases have been achieved mainly through agricultural intensification [1]. Satisfying the increasing feed and food demand will mainly come from yield improvement: it will be required that wheat yield (and other staple crops) be increased by at least 50% in the next few decades [2], which will depend, among other components, on improving yield potential [3]. This scenario becomes more complex if we consider that each degree-Celsius increase in global mean temperature would, on average, reduce global and in particular Argentinean wheat yields by 6.0% [4, 5]. Furthermore, crop management will need to be environmentally more sustainable in the future [1]. Under this restrictive context, yield genetic gain will be required to increase by 1.16–1.31% per year to satisfy the projected demand of cereals for food, feed and biofuels by 2050 [6]. Unfortunately, genetic gains reported in wheat from different countries for the last decades seem to have been increasing less than required [79].

In Argentina, with 4.46 Mha, wheat is the third most important crop in terms of planted area after soybean and corn, average 2012-2016 [10], spanning a wide range of environments. Since 1999 the genetic gain of local cultivars has shown signs of stagnation, as indicated by genetic gain values of only 0.18% per year, mostly explained by a stabilization in grain number per unit area without changes in grain weight. Modern cultivars have increased the number of grains per spike without changes in spike number per unit area; fruiting efficiency (a.k.a. spike fertility index) was the trait that better explained the changes in grain number per unit area, and its improvement might be a way to promote increments in grain number without penalization in grain weight [1113].

Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping is currently key for understanding the genetic basis of complex traits [14], including yield components and adaptation. Cost-effective, high-throughput genotyping tools for genetic study, such as single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, are now available for all major crop species, including wheat [15], enabling the characterisation of (i) genome-wide population diversity and structure; (ii) selective sweeps and directional selection; and (iii) marker-trait relationships in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [16, 17]. Nonetheless, in this latter context, certain limitations are found: (i) SNPs only provide biallelic information [18]; and (ii) associations are likely to be due to loci in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with a gene or a controlling sequence, rather than to underlying causal reasons [19]. To overcome the biallelic problem and increase the resolution of candidate regions, the analysis of haplotypes can be employed, i.e. of the combination of co-inherited markers from polymorphic sites within a certain chromosome region. Exploring haplotypes in this way can take full advantage of ancient recombination events in order to identify the genetic loci underlying traits at a relatively high resolution [20].

The recently released wheat reference genome assembly (IWGSC Ref. Seq. v1.0), developed by the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC) [21], allows a more accurate comparison of the chromosome regions associated with agronomic traits from independent research studies and helps accelerate cloning of further important genes for wheat breeding.

In this study, 102 Argentinean wheat cultivars were genotyped by using the 35k Axiom Wheat Breeder’s Genotyping Array [22]. The polymorphic SNPs were physically anchored to the wheat reference genome assembly [21] and the genetic structure of the collection was determined. Based on multi-environmental trial data, haplotype-based GWAS was conducted to identify chromosome regions affecting crop adaptation and the building of yields. Adaptation traits include heading date, a relevant trait since it will determine the environment to which the crop will be exposed during its reproductive stages, and plant height, which is the trait most associated with lodging in Argentinean cultivars [23]. Yield-related traits include thousand grain weight and number of grains per spike, currently called "numerical components of yield", which are the main factors proposed by [24] to analyze the differences in yield between cultivars. Additionally, [25] proposed considering the number of grains (GN) as the product between two variables currently known as "ecophysiological components": the spike dry weight at anthesis (SDWA) and the fruiting efficiency (FE, aka spike fertility index, ie the quotient between GNS and SDWA). Later [26] proposed the use of spike dry weight at harvest without grains (or chaff) as a substitute to SDWA. Then, the fruiting efficiency is calculated in this work as the grain number produced per unit of chaff (FEh). The FEh has shown a high association with the GN in both Argentinean [13, 2729] and foreign [30] cultivars and moderately high heritability [12, 28, 29]. GWAS provides valuable information for a better understanding of the major genetic components involved in adaptation and yield components for bread wheat, with major implications for breeding programs aimed at increasing yield potential of new cultivars, in order to contribute to food security.

Results

SNP-based genetic structure of the Argentinean wheat collection

The genotyping of the 102 Argentinean hexaploid wheat cultivars collection yielded a total of 7972 polymorphic SNPs with MAF ≥ 10%. A set of 6486 polymorphic SNPs was genetically anchored to specific wheat chromosomes based on mapping information from five biparental populations described previously [22]. A second set of 909 additional SNPs were anchored to specific chromosomes using three local biparental populations and an additional 577 SNPs were anchored using the association method mentioned above (Additional file 1: Table S1). Of all the anchored SNPs, 3034 were on the A subgenome, 4010 on the B subgenome and the lowest number, 928 SNPs, on the D subgenome. To reveal the genetic relationships among the 102 Argentinean hexaploid wheat cultivars collection, we conducted a model-based approach using R STRUCTURE software [31]. A model-based approach is a cluster analysis that evaluates genetic similarity among genotypes without using prior information. For the analysis we used the 7972 SNPs anchored to the wheat genome described before. We detected four subpopulations in the collection reflecting the origin of the germplasm used by the main breeding programs in Argentina (Additional file 2: Table S2). A graphical representation of the STRUCTURE Q matrix was included (Additional file 3: Figure S1). Subpopulation 1 (Table 1) included only introduced cultivars of French origin (100%), with the Nidera, Syngenta and Sursem breeding companies exclusively represented in this group. Subpopulation 2 included most of the old cultivars (9 out of 12 released between 1930 and 1990), also known as traditional germplasm [32, 33] and all cultivars from the Don Mario breeding company released up until 2010. Subpopulation 3 included cultivars released by the Klein breeding company (46.15%) and, in lower frequency, cultivars belonging to the ACA, Buck, INTA and Relmó breeding companies, most of them with pedigrees including CIMMYT germplasm. Finally, subpopulation 4 included cultivars released by INTA (33.33%), Buck, Klein, ACA and Relmó, with most of them also having pedigrees including CIMMYT germplasm.

Table 1.

Distribution of the 102 Argentinean bread wheat cultivars in the four subpopulations detected using a model-based approach

Subp. Cultivar
1 Baguette 10; Baguette 17; Baguette 18; Baguette 19; Baguette 21; Baguette 30; Baguette 31; Baguette 9; Baguette P. 11; SY 100; SY 200; SY 300; SRN Nogal
2 ACA 201; ACA 320; Barletta 77; BIOINTA 1004; BIOINTA BONAERENSE 2001; BIOINTA 2004; Buck Chacarero; Buck Guapo; Buck Malevo; Buck Mangrullo; Buck Meteoro; Buck Napostá; Buck Norteño; Buck Pingo; Buck Ranquel; Buck Taita; Don Mario Arex; Don Mario Atlax; Don Mario Cronox; Don Mario Onix; Don Mario Themix; LE 2249; LE 2271; Klein 32; Klein Atlas; Klein Centauro; Klein Escorpión; Klein Impacto; Klein Proteo; Klein Rendidor; KleinTauro; Olaeta Artillero; Sinvalocho
3 ACA 223; ACA 903B; ACA 906; BIOINTA 1001; BIOINTA 3004; Buck Baqueano; Buck Huanchen; Buck Puelche; Klein Brujo; Klein Cacique; Klein Carpincho; Klein Castor; Klein Don Enrique; Klein Gavilán; Klein Gladiador; Klein Guerrero; Klein Nutria; Klein Tigre; Klein Yarará; Klein Zorro; LE 2333; LE 2341; ProINTA Gaucho; ProINTA Granar; ProINTA Guazú; ProINTA Oasis
4 55 CL 2; ACA 202; ACA 801; ACA 901; ACA 907; BIOINTA 1000; BIOINTA 1002; BIOINTA 1003; BIOINTA 1005; BIOINTA 1006; BIOINTA 3003; BIOINTA 3005; Buck 75 Aniversario; Buck AGP Fast; Buck Biguá; Buck Brasil; Buck Pronto; INIA Centinela; LE 2294; Klein Capricornio; Klein Chajá; Klein León; Klein Pantera; Klein Rayo; LE 2330; LE 2331; Marcos Juárez INTA; ProINTA Elite; ProINTA IslaVerde; Relmó Sirirí

SNP and gene marker-based haplotype blocks construction and characterization of the Argentinean wheat cultivar collection

A detailed information about the haplotype-based map construction for the Argentinean wheat collection is found in the Table 2. A total of 1268 haplotype blocks (HBs) were built in our wheat cultivars collection, of which 518 were on the A subgenome, 641 on the B subgenome and 109 on the D subgenome. The 94% of the SNP and gene markers were involved in these HBs and only 495 SNP/gene-related markers were not included in any HB. The average block sizes were significantly larger on the D subgenome chromosomes than on the A or B subgenomes, with observed averages of 13.5, 6.7 and 4.8 Mb, respectively (Table 2). In general, within each chromosome, the largest HBs (> 30 Mb) were placed in the centromeric region, where recombination is lower, while the smallest HBs were located towards the telomeric regions, where the recombination rate and gene density are higher (Fig. 1a). The average distance between HBs on the D subgenome was 8 times larger than that for the B or A subgenomes, with an average of 16.1, 2.7 and 2.4 Mb, respectively. The maximum spacing between segments was also significantly higher in the D subgenome with respect to B and A, with average values of 106.6, 57.1 and 44.2 Mb, respectively (Table 2). An interesting case can be described for chromosome 1 B, where we observed several large HBs on the short arm, from HB 9 to 20 (HB average size 24 Mb in the region). A possible explanation is the presence of the 1BL/1RS wheat/rye translocation which is maintained at high frequency in Argentinean cultivars. The lack of recombination events within the translocation generates a highly conserved block involving almost the entire short arm of chromosome 1B (Fig. 1b) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Detailed information about the haplotype-based map construction for the Argentinean wheat collection

Chr. SNPs/ Haplotype HB3 SNPs per HB HB size4 HB spacing4
SG1 GM2 count count Avg. Max. Avg. Max. Avg. Max.
1A 431 244 66 6.2 26 4.5 59.4 3.4 125.4
1B 919 327 91 9.7 168 5.8 115.6 1.3 21.6
1D 253 74 22 10.8 90 8.5 48.8 10.0 115.8
2A 421 239 70 5.4 60 7.9 166.7 2.1 26.7
2B 709 459 127 5.2 40 3.8 88.8 1.8 35.9
2D 272 79 23 11.4 38 16.7 240.6 9.0 91.1
3A 389 268 75 4.8 22 6.7 261.7 2.3 28.6
3B 597 421 116 4.8 18 3.5 40.3 2.7 101.3
3D 115 56 15 7.4 21 21.8 124.5 16.9 80.7
4A 326 216 59 5.1 36 9.5 211.3 2.2 16.3
4B 253 141 42 5.3 26 4.7 39.1 6.6 162.4
4D 47 29 8 4.1 14 16.0 78.3 17.6 103.2
5A 544 340 99 5.3 38 4.6 247.9 2.1 49.8
5B 641 365 102 5.8 67 4.5 110.1 1.7 19.7
5D 110 36 11 9.3 28 13.7 133.7 21.6 106.2
6A 433 227 60 7.0 55 8.2 168.9 2.5 33.5
6B 532 300 86 5.8 55 5.6 202.1 2.0 21.1
6D 69 45 13 4.8 12 4.6 32.1 20.6 153.5
7A 509 330 89 5.3 34 5.2 121.4 2.3 28.8
7B 374 270 77 4.5 18 6.0 89.2 2.9 37.8
7D 80 50 17 4.2 11 13.2 185.0 16.9 95.7
A 436.1 266.3 74 5.6 38.7 6.7 176.8 2.4 44.2
B 575.0 326.1 92 5.9 56.0 4.8 97.9 2.7 57.1
D 82.1 52.7 16 7.5 30.6 13.5 120.4 16.1 106.6
Overall 436.9 269.5 60 6.3 41.6 8.3 131.7 7.1 69.3

1 SG = Subgenomes. 2 GM = Gene-related Markers. 3 HB = Haplotype Blocks. 4 The units are expressed in Mb based on the coordinates in the IWGSC Ref. Seq. v1.0 wheat genome assembly

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a HB sizes and position in each wheat chromosome based on IWGSC Ref Seq v1.0 coordinates. The red HBs indicate sizes >30 Mb, orange HBs sizes between 10 and 30 Mb and green HBs sizes <10 Mb. b Schematic representation of the LD (Linkage Disequilibrium) detected on chromosome 1B. In red, the high level of LD in the short arm of the chromosome due to the presence of the 1BL/1RS wheat/rye translocation

Broad sense heritability and correlations among traits

All evaluated traits showed high heritability: the crop adaptation traits HD and PH showed broad sense heritability values higher than 0.95 and the yield related traits FEh, TGW and GNS displayed values in all cases higher than 0.80 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Broad sense heritability (H2) and variance components for the best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) of five traits across the tested environments

Trait No. env. σG2 σE2 σE2 H2
FEh 10 74.69 232.24 139.43 0.84
TGW 10 5.24 20.19 12.63 0.81
GNS 10 17.43 28.59 34.77 0.83
HD 11 89.31 143.44 39.76 0.96
PH 11 79.94 109.18 26.52 0.97

σG2 = genotypic variance; σE2 = environmental variance; σE2 = residual variance (here = σGxE2 since BLUPs have a single replication per environment); H2 = broad sense heritability. All genotype and environment variances were signifcant at P<0.001

Regarding correlations between traits across the tested locations, the most consistent pattern was observed for FEh vs GNS, with positive correlations in most years at the Southern locations, Azul and Balcarce, and in all years at the Northern location Marcos Juárez (Table 4). The relationship between FEh vs TGW showed no significant correlations in all tested environments, except Azul 2014.

Table 4.

Pearson’s correlation among traits in the different tested environments

South locations North location
Azul Balcarce Marcos Juárez
Traits 131 14 14 15 12 13 14 15 16
HDvsPH -0.23* ns 0.26* 0.32* ns ns 0.35** ns ns
HDvsFEh 0.23* 0.52*** ns ns ns ns ns ns -0.31*
HDvsTGW ns -0.42*** ns ns ns ns ns -0.47*** -0.34**
HDvsGNS ns 0.44*** 0.26* ns ns -0.31* ns -0.41*** -0.44***
PHvsFEh -0.28* ns -0.32* -0.35** ns ns ns ns ns
PHvsTGW ns 0.24* ns ns 0.48*** 0.37** 0.40*** 0.39*** 0.43***
PHvsGNS -0.23* ns -0.38*** -0.31* 0.21* ns ns ns ns
FEhvsTGW ns -0.67*** ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
FEhvsGNS ns 0.47*** 0.35** 0.24* 0.58*** 0.31* 0.38** 0.36** 0.58***
TGWvsGNS 0.22* -0.21* ns ns ns ns 0.25* 0.48*** 0.43***

1 years after 2000; ns = not significant, * P <0.05, ** P <0.001, *** P <0.0001. HD, heading date; PH, plant height; FEh, fruiting efficiency at harvest; TGW, thousand grain weight; GNS, grains number per spike

The PH showed a positive correlation with TGW in Azul (one year) and in all years in Marcos Juárez with higher significant values. On the other hand, the PH showed negative correlations with GNS in most years at the Southern locations, contrasting with Marcos Juárez with no significant correlation in most tested years. A similar pattern can be described for PH vs FEh, with negative correlations in most years at the Southern locations, contrasting with Marcos Juárez with no significant correlations in all years (Table 4).

The HD showed a positive correlation with GNS in the Southern locations (2 years), contrasting with Marcos Juárez with negative correlations in three years. The HD also showed negative and highly significant correlations with TGW in Azul (1 year) and Marcos Juárez (2 years). A positive correlation between HD and FEh was observed in Azul (2 years), differing from Marcos Juárez with no significant correlations in most tested years. The HD vs PH showed contrasting correlations at the Southern locations and no significant correlations in most years in Marcos Juárez. The TGW vs GNS correlation showed positive values in Marcos Juárez (3 years), with no significant correlations in most Southern environments (Table 4).

Contrasting correlations observed across the Southern and Northern locations for PH vs GNS, PH vs FEh, HD vs GNS, HD vs FEh and, to a lesser extent, PH vs TGW, might suggest different strategies are involved in building site-specific yield components performance: genotypes adapted to the Northern latitudes would be favored by taller plants improving TGW, but affected by late flowering penalyzing TGW and GNS, whereas genotypes adapted to Southern latitudes would be favored by late flowering improving GNS and FEh, but affected by taller plants penalyzing FEh. Interestingly, independently of the environment, genotypes with high FEh would favor GNS, one of the most important yield components.

Haplotype-based gWAS analysis

Fruiting efficiency at harvest (FEh):

We identified 17 haplotypes/markers associated with FEh of which one belongs to chromosome 1A, seven to 2A, one to 3B, two to 4A, two to 5A, three to 6A and one to 7A (Table 5; Additional file 6: Table S5). Eleven haplotypes associated with FEh were significant in at least one year in each of the three locations, i.e. Southern (Azul and Balcarce) and Northern (Marcos Juárez). Five haplotypes were significant exclusively in Southern locations and only the SNP AX-94874921 located on chromosome 2A (707.1Mb) showed significant association exclusively in Marcos Juárez.

Table 5.

GWAS results for FEh, TGW, GNS, HD and PH. Information of haplotypes/SNPs physical location, frequency in the collection and effect direction, P values in each environment and the colocated traits

Ref. Seq. v1.0 (Mb) Freq. Azul Balcarce Marcos Juárez
Trait Haplotype/SNP1 Chr. Start End Effect2 133 14 13 14 15 11 12 13 14 15 16 Coloc.
FEh Chr1A-B32-Hap4 1A 482.3 487.0 6+ * ns * * ** - ns ns ns ns ns
Chr2A-B19-Hap3 2A 70.2 72.9 12+ * ns * * ns - ** ns * ns ns
Chr2A-B23-Hap1 2A 83.8 84.5 52- * * * * ns - * ns ns * *
Chr2A-B26-Hap3 2A 102.0 102.7 36+ * ** ** * ns - ns ns ns ns *
Chr2A-B30-Hap4 2A 165.8 182.1 7+ ** ns * * ns - ns * ns ns ns
Chr2A-B49-Hap2 2A 704.8 705.8 15+ * * * ** * - ns ns ns ns ns GNS
AX-94874921 2A 707.1 - 16+ ns ns ns ns ns - ** ns * * *
Chr2A-B55-Hap1 2A 716.8 718.9 12+ * *** ** * * - ns ns ns ns ns
Chr3B-B14-Hap4 3B 23.0 24.0 6+ ns ns ** * * - ** ns ns * ns
AX-94869767 4A 606.4 - 18+ * ns * * ns - * * ns * *
Chr4A-B35-Hap3 4A 625.7 625.9 23+ ** * ** * * - ns ns ns ns ns
Chr5A-B33-Hap4 5A 445.2 445.2 7+ ** * * * ns - ns ns ns ns ns PH
Chr5A-B43-Hap1 5A 476.4 476.7 15+ * ns * * ns - ns ** ns * ns
Chr6A-B24-Hap2 6A 205.1 233.3 17+ *** * * ns ns - ns ns ns ns * TGW
Chr6A-B28-Hap4 6A 448.7 454.6 9- * * * ** * - * ns ns ns ns
Chr6A-B29-Hap2 6A 455.6 467.0 25+ *** ns * * ns - ns ns * ns *
Chr7A-B36-Hap2 7A 119.0 126.0 10+ * ns * ** * - ns ns ns ns *
TGW Chr2D-B5-Hap3 2D 17.6 18.2 7- * * ns ns ns - ns ns * * **
Chr3A-B12-Hap3 3A 46.7 52.6 5- ns * ns * * - ** * * ns ns
AX-95257035 3A 686.8 - 11+ ns ns ns ns ns - * ns *** ** *
Chr3B-B111-Hap4 3B 817.4 817.8 11+ ns ns ns * ns - ** ns * * ns PH
AX-94459169 6A 0.6 - 30+ ns ** * ns ns - ns * *** *** **
Chr6A-B20-Hap3 6A 63.8 74.0 21- ns ns * ns ns - ns ns * ** *
Chr6A-B21-Hap3 6A 74.5 101.3 20- ns ns * ns ns - ns ns * ** *
Chr6A-B24-Hap2 6A 205.1 233.3 17- ns ns ** ns ns - * ns * *** * FEh
Chr7B-B38-Hap3 7B 626.1 627.6 5+ ns *** ** ns ns - ns * * ns **
Chr7B-B60-Hap2 7B 702.3 703.7 27+ ns ns ns * ns - * * ** * *
Chr7B-B60-Hap3 7B 702.3 703.7 15+ ns ns * ns ns - * * ** ** **
GNS Chr2A-B49-Hap2 2A 704.8 705.8 15+ * ns * ** ** - ns ns * ns ns FEh
Chr4A-B19-Hap5 4A 231.0 349.3 13+ * ** ns ns ns - ** * * ns *
HD Chr1B-B76-Hap2 1B 643.1 645.7 35+ * ** ns ns ns ** * * ns * *
Chr1B-B84-Hap3 1B 667.2 667.8 17- ns ns ** ** * ns * * * ns ns
Chr1B-B89-Hap4 1B 676.8 678.0 6- ns ns * ** * * * ns * * ns
Chr2B-B40-Hap4 2B 162.9 166.9 10+ * ** ns ns ns ns * ns * * ns
Chr2B-B62-Hap1 2B 564.2 569.0 10+ * ** ns ns ns * ns ns ns * ns
Ppd-D1 sensitive 2D 34 - 42+ * * * * * ** *** ** *** *** **
Chr3A-B31-Hap1 3A 504.8 507.5 59- ns ns * ns * ** * * * * *
Chr3A-B49-Hap3 3A 631.2 633.1 12- ** ns * * ns * * ns * ** *
Chr3A-B59-Hap3 3A 695.5 695.7 19+ ns * ns ns ns ** * ** * * ns
Chr3A-B60-Hap4 3A 699.4 700.6 10+ ns ** ns ns ns ** * *** ** * ns
Chr3D-B7-Hap1 3D 518.2 560.1 54- * * ns ns ns * * ** * * *
Chr5B-B75-Hap4 5B 597.2 601.4 11- * ns ns ns ns * * ns * ** ns
AX-94610041 6A 13.8 - 46+ * * ** * * ** ns * * * ns
Chr6A-B43-Hap1 6A 591.7 592.5 61- ns ** ns ns ns * * ** * * *
Chr6B-B26-Hap3 6B 157.6 157.8 11+ * ** ns ns ns ns ns ns * * ** PH
Chr7A-B24-Hap2 7A 68.0 70.2 8+ ns ns * ** * * ns ** * * ns
PH Chr1A-B38-Hap3 1A 508.6 510.4 16+ * ** ns ns ns * ns ns * ns ns
Chr1B-B17-Hap4 1B 121.0 124.0 5+ * * * ** * *** * * * * **
AX-94510167 1B 548.7 - 21+ ns * ns ** * ** ns ns * ns ns
Chr1B-B54-Hap1 1B 580.5 581.2 43- * ** ns * * * ns ns *** *** ns
Lr10 1D 8.6 - 10+ * * ** ns * ns * ns * * ns
Chr1D-B5-Hap4 1D 11.6 11.9 19- * ** ns * * * ns * * * *
Chr1D-B10-Hap4 1D 31.1 32.5 10+ * ns *** * ns * * ns ns ns ns
Chr2A-B39-Hap1 2A 611.2 611.9 70- ** ns ** ns ns * ns * ns ns *
Chr2A-B48-Hap3 2A 701.0 702.1 15- * *** * ns * * ns ns * * ns
Chr2B-B56-Hap4 2B 469.2 476.6 6+ ns * ** * ns * ns * ns ** *
Chr2B-B79-Hap3 2B 664.2 664.9 5+ * ns ** * ns ** ns * ns ** *
AX-94687989 2B 702.2 - 52+ ns ** ns ns ns ns * ns ** * ns
Chr2B-B97-Hap1 2B 719.5 719.5 38- ns ** ns ns ns ns * ns ** * *
Chr2B-B114-Hap4 2B 762.0 763.9 8+ ** * * ns * ns ns ns * ns ns
AX-94585596 2B 776.4 - 15+ * ** ns ns * ** * * * ns ns
AX-94624485 2B 776.8 - 10+ * * * ns ns ** * * ns ns ns
Chr2B-B122-Hap3 2B 777.1 777.2 6+ * * * ns * *** ** * * * ns
Chr3A-B22-Hap2 3A 391.5 393.4 53+ * * ns * ns * ** * * ns *
AX-95090222 3A 700.6 - 18+ ** ns ns * ns ns ** ns * ns ns
AX-95083205 3A 743.9 - 46+ ** * ns ns * ns ns * * ns ns
Chr3B-B6-Hap1 3B 16.4 17.1 65- * * * ns * ns * * ** ** *
Chr3B-B55-Hap4 3B 511.1 513.6 6- ** * ns ns * ns ns ns ns * *
Chr3B-B60-Hap6 3B 541.5 544.5 5+ * ns * * ns ** * * * * ns
Chr3B-B109-Hap2 3B 796.0 799.1 9- * ** * ns ns ns ns ns ns * *
Chr3B-B111-Hap4 3B 817.4 817.8 11+ *** ns * * ** *** * ** * * * TGW
Chr4A-B57-Hap6 4A 738.7 739.7 9- * ns ns ** ns ** ns ns ns * ns
Chr4B-B28-Hap5 4B 612.2 613.2 6+ * ** * * * * * * * * ns
Chr4B-B36-Hap2 4B 650.7 650.7 57- ** * * * ns * ** ** ns * ns
Chr5A-B16-Hap4 5A 33.0 33.2 5+ * * * * * ** ** ns ns ns ns
Chr5A-B33-Hap4 5A 445.2 445.2 7- ns *** * ns ns * ns ns ns * * FEh
Chr5A-B54-Hap3 5A 516.1 527.9 5+ ns * * ** ** *** ns ns * * *
Chr5A-B82-Hap2 5A 611.6 613.5 10+ * ns * ns ns * *** ns * ns *
Chr5B-B26-Hap2 5B 430.7 430.7 17+ ** * ns * * * * ns ns ns *
AX-94550178 5B 455.7 - 46+ ns ns *** * * * ns ns * ns ns
Chr5B-B92-Hap4 5B 683.5 684.0 5+ * ns * * ns ** * * * ns **
Chr6A-B2-Hap5 6A 0.6 0.8 5+ * ns ** ** * ns ns ns * * ns
Chr6A-B4-Hap2 6A 2.2 2.7 26+ * ns * * ** ns * ns ns * ns
Chr6A-B4-Hap3 6A 2.2 2.7 17- ** * * ns * ns * ns * ** *
Chr6A-B16-Hap1 6A 48.6 49.8 57+ ns ns ns * ns * * ns ** * **
Chr6A-B17-Hap3 6A 50.3 51.4 33- ns * * * ns ** ns * * ** ns
Chr6A-B54-Hap5 6A 610.0 610.2 6+ ns ns * * ns *** ns ** ns ns ns
Chr6B-B7-Hap2 6B 19.8 20.7 82- ** *** ** * ns * *** * * * *
Chr6B-B20-Hap4 6B 124.4 126.1 6+ * ns ns ns ns ** * * ns * *
Chr6B-B25-Hap4 6B 151.4 156.4 25- * ** * * ** ns ns ns * * ns
Chr6B-B26-Hap3 6B 157.6 157.8 11- * *** ns * ns * * * ns * *** HD
Chr6B-B31-Hap2 6B 195.3 197.8 5+ * ns ** ** * ** ns ns * * *
AX-94943227 6B 234.8 - 17+ ** *** ** * * * *** * * * *
Chr6B-B47-Hap3 6B 480.4 491.6 24- ns ns ns * ** ns ns ns * ns *
AX-94476474 7A 561.6 - 14+ ** * * ns ns ns ns ** * * ns
Chr7B-B14-Hap4 7B 59.6 61.6 22- *** ns ns ns * ns * ns ns * ns
Chr7B-B76-Hap3 7B 743.5 743.6 10- ** *** * * ns * ns * ** ** *

1 Information about SNPs ID and/or gene molecular marker that were involved in the haplotypes was detailed in the Additional file 6: Table S5. 2 Freq. = Number of genotypes that present the SNP / haplotype in the collection. Effect (+) the SNP / haplotype increases the phenotypic value and (-) reduces the phenotypic value. 3 Years after 2000. Only SNPs that passed selection criteria in GWAS are presented in the table. ns = not significant, * P <0.05, ** P <0.001, *** P <0.0001, "–" = not available

An example of a haplotype with significant association with FEh across Southern and Northern locations is Chr5A-B43-Hap1, located on chromosome 5A (476.4-476.7 Mb) (Fig. 2a). The HB Chr5A-B43 is composed of seven SNPs, and the significantly associated haplotype Hap1.The Chr5A-B43-Hap1 was detected in 16 out of 102 evaluated cultivars (Fig. 2b). The presence of Chr5A-B43-Hap1 significantly increased FEh in the three tested locations, albeit with different intensities, with a stronger effect in Southern locations (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Manhattan plot on 21 wheat chromosomes for fruiting efficiency at harvest (FEh) in Balcarce 2013. Red line represents the GWAS threshold of P <0.05 = −log10 (P-value) = 1.3 and blue line represents the GWAS threshold of P <0.001 = −log10 (P-value) = 3. Red square highlights the Chr5A-B43-Hap1 associated with FEh in five of ten tested environments. b Haplotype block based on seven SNP markers located between 476.44 and 476.67Mb on chromosome 5A, named Chr5A-B43. Four different haplotype variants (Hap1–Hap4) are present at different frequencies in the analyzed population. Red rectangle highlights the Chr5A-B43-Hap1 associated with FEh. c Boxplots indicate the phenotype values corresponding to the four different haplotype groups in the three evaluated locations. Hap1 was associated significantly high FEh in all locations

Three haplotypes significantly associated with FEh were detected as colocating with additional traits: haplotype Chr2A-B49-Hap2 on 2A (704.8-705.8 Mb) was colocated with GNS, haplotype Chr5A-B33-Hap4 on chromosome 5A (445.2-445.2 Mb) with PH and Chr6A-B24-Hap2 on chromosome 6A (205.1-233.3 Mb) with TGW. The correlations for the first two haplotypes were significant only in Southern locations (Azul and Balcarce), while the third was significant in all locations. In the case of Chr2A-B49-Hap2, the correlation with GNS was positive, as shown in Table 5, and the cultivars with the haplotype for higher FEh also presented higher GNS. In the case of Chr5A-B33-Hap4, the correlation with PH was negative (Table 5) and cultivars with the haplotype for higher FEh values showed lower values for PH. Finally, for Chr6A-B24-Hap2, the correlation was also negative (Table 5): cultivars with the haplotype for higher FEh values showed lower values for TGW.

Thousand grain weight (TGW):

We identified 11 haplotypes/markers associated with TGW, of which one belongs to chromosome 2D, two to 3A, one to 3B, four to 6A and three to 7B (Table 5). The SNP AX-95257035 located on chromosome 3A (686.8 Mb) was significantly associated with TGW only in Marcos Juárez in four of five tested years. The remaining ten haplotypes/markers showed significant associations with TGW across Southern and Northern locations with, in general terms, higher significance values at the Northern location (Table 5).

Two haplotypes significantly associated with TGW and colocating with other traits were detected. The Chr3B-B111-246 Hap4 on chromosome 3B (817.4-817.8 Mb) colocated with PH, with the previously described Chr6A-B24-247 Hap2 on chromosome 6A (205.1-233.3Mb) colocating with FEh. In the case of Chr3B-B111-Hap4, the correlation with PH was positive, as cultivars carrying the haplotype for higher TGW also expressed higher PH (Table 5).

grain number per spike (GNS):

We identified two haplotypes associated with GNS, one belonging to chromosome 2A and the second to 4A (Table 5). The Chr2A-B49-Hap2 was significantly associated across all locations and Chr4A-B19-Hap5 was significantly associated in Azul and Marcos Juárez, though with no significant effect in Balcarce. The haplotype Chr2A-B49-Hap2 colocated with FEh and its effect was previously described (Table 5).

Heading date (HD):

A total of 16 haplotypes/markers showed significant associations with HD. The regions were distributed as follows: three on chromosome 1B, two on 2B, one on 2D, four on 3A, one on 3D, one on 5B, two on 6A, one on 6B and one on chromosome 7A. For this trait, it is important to highlight the consistent effect of the functional marker for the Ppd-D1 gene on chromosome 2D, which showed significant associations over the three tested locations during in all evaluated years. The highest associations were detected in Marcos Juárez with latitude 5 lower than Southern locations (Azul and Balcarce). Cultivars carrying the Ppd-D1 sensitive allele (42 of the 102 cultivars tested) delayed flowering in all environments. Also it is important to mention that all haplotypes affecting HD showed significant associations at the Northern location in two or more years, contrasting with Southern locations Azul, showing three haplotypes with no significant effects on HD, and Balcarce, with nine haplotypes in the same situation. Additionally, we identified one haplotype colocated with PH, Chr6B-B26-Hap3 (157.6-157.8Mb), that increased HD values and negatively affected PH (Table 5).

Plant height (PH):

In the haplotype-based GWAS, 51 chromosome regions were associated with this trait. Among these, one was located on chromosome 1A, three on 1B, three on 1D, two on 2A, eight on 2B, three on 3A, five on 3B, one on 4A, two on 4B, four on 5A, three on 5B, six on 6A, seven on 6B, one on 7A and two on chromosome 7B. Forty-six haplotypes/markers showed significant associations across all locations, including haplotype Chr1B-B17-Hap4 and SNP AX-94943227 on chromosome 6B that showed consistent significant effects in all tested locations and years. Three haplotypes significantly associated with PH colocated with traits FEh, TGW and HD, with contributions previously described (Table 5).

Discussion

Genetic structure and haplotype characterization

In this work, results of a model-based cluster analysis differentiated four subpopulations, whereas previously [32], using the same 102 cultivars and a small number of markers associated with genes of agronomic interest and neutral markers (SSRs and ISBPs), detected three subpopulations, which nonetheless and as expected overlapped with the four identified here. In general terms, subpopulations 1 and 2 in our study matched with subpopulations 1 and 3 of the previous work, in including introductions of European origin and traditional germplasm, respectively. Subpopulations 3 and 4 in our study matched subpopulation 2 of the previous work, all including in most cases germplasm with pedigrees of CIMMYT origin. Differences between subpopulations 3 and 4 may be related to the presence of the 1BL/1RS wheat-rye translocation, as 24/26 cultivars in subpopulation 3 carry this, whereas no cultivar is in a similar situation in subpopulation 4 (data not shown). This translocation has been widely used in breeding to achieve resistance to several pathogens and insects, to broaden adaptation and to increase yield [34]. Argentina is no exception, as modern cultivars carrying 1BL/1RS have shown: Klein Gladiador, Klein Nutria, Klein Yarará, LE 2333, LE 2341 and ACA 906, released between 2009 and 2010, confirm the consistent contribution of the translocation to biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. In spite of these advantages, special attention should be given to the use of 1BL/1RS, due to its detrimental effects on gluten strength and bread-making quality, albeit that they vary depending upon the genetic background [35].

Wheat has been exposed to intense artificial and natural selection since its domestication, resulting in large HBs as observed in elite germplasm [18, 36]. This issue can be observed in our work with the just mentioned presence of the 1BL/1RS wheat-rye translocation (Fig. 1b). In any case, we must also take into account the position of the HB in the chromosome, as we see in Fig. 1a, where large haplotypes (> 30 Mb) are formed in centromeric and pericentromeric regions of each chromosome. As previously reported in the work of [37], these regions can be a challenge when introducing allelic variants of interest in the region and reducing the size of the HBs.

GWAS analysis

Yield potential related traits:

Fruiting efficiency has been proposed as a promising trait for increasing yield potential in wheat [12, 13, 28, 38, 39]. We detected 15 significant haplotypes/markers with positive effects on FEh and only two negatives (Table 5). The strongest genetic associations for FEh were detected in the Southern locations Azul and Balcarce, with lower associations observed in Marcos Juárez. These results imply FEh could provide an avenue to increase yield in regions where yield potential is high, as in the case of the Southern locations in our study.

In a previous study, a positive correlation between FEh and grain number was detected [13, 39]. Here, we detected a haplotype Chr2A-B49-Hap2 (704.8-705.8Mb) on chromosome 2A, that positively modifies both the traits FEh and GNS (Table 5). In a further study, [40] detected a SNP associated with FE and grains per spikelet (RFL_Contig3780_64), located at 676.24 Mb on chromosome 2A. They proposed CONSTANS 4 (CO4) and TaVrs1 genes as candidates to explain the variation detected. However, based upon the IWGSC Ref Seq. V1.0, CO4 is located at 594.58 Mb (81.66 Mb proximal to RFL_Contig3780_64). Our haplotype Chr2A-B49-Hap2 is located 28.56 Mb distal from RFL_Contig3780_64. The physical distance between the Chr2A-B49-Hap2 and CO4 is estimated as 110.22 Mb, and, taking into account the critical value for the decay of linkage desequilibrium (LD) by 0.1 is estimated as an average of 50 Mb for the wheat genome [41], would discard CO4 as a candidate for the FEh QTL detected at Chr2A-B49-Hap2. On the other hand, the gene TaVrs1, also called GNI-A1, was recently cloned and characterized by [42]; unfortunately the GNI-A1 gene is not assembled on IWGSC Ref Seq. V1.0 chromosome 2A and its location cannot be compared to the Chr2A-B49-Hap2 haplotype.

In contrast, a negative relationship between FEh and TGW has also been described [28, 39]. In the current work, we detected haplotype Chr6A-B24-Hap2 (205.1-233.3Mb) that increases FEh values, but penalizes TGW.

Little is known about the relationship between FEh and PH. We detected a haplotype on chromosome 5A, Chr5A-B33-Hap4 (445.2 Mb) that associates with both traits, but in opposite directions.

Another relevant trait in the determination of yield potential is grain weight. We detected six significant haplotypes/markers with positive effects and five with negative effects on TGW (Table 5). This list includes four haplotypes on chromosome 6A associated with TGW, one of them Chr6A-B24-Hap2 (205.1-233.3Mb). This haplotype, negatively associated with TGW and positively associated with FEh, was located 4.5Mb proximal to the gene TaGW2-A1, which is located at 237.75Mb on chromosome 6A and has been shown to be related to grain weight [43]. Non-functional mutants for this gene increase the weight and size of wheat grains [44]. Shared function and physical location would turn TaGW2-A1 into a promising candidate gene for Chr6A-B24-Hap2. On the other hand, the gene TaGS5-3A located at 176.55Mb on chromosome 3A has also been associated with larger grain size and higher thousand grain weight [45]. We found one haplotype and one SNP associated with TGW on chromosome 3A (Table 5), but they were located too far away from TaGS5-3A (123 and 510Mb apart, respectively) to be considered as a gene candidate. In the opposite direction to that observed for FEh, the strongest genetic associations for TGW were detected in the Northern location Marcos Juárez, promoting TGW as an interesting trait to increase yield for those latitudes.

For GNS, [46] used GWAS to detect a region located at 691.22Mb on chromosome 2A that significantly affects the number of grains per spike. We detected the haplotype Chr2A-B49-Hap2, located at 704.8-705.8 Mb, that positively affects GNS, only 13 Mb distal from the [46] region.

Crop adaptation related traits:

For HD, we found that the Ppd-D1 gene marker [47] is the strongest associated with the trait, especially in the location Marcos Juárez, situated at the lowest latitude in our study. These results agree with those obtained by [33], where the Ppd-D1 gene was found to be the main determinant of life cycle in Argentinean wheat cultivars.

On chromosome 1B, we detected three haplotypes associated with HD. [48] proposed the gene TaFT-B3 (581.4Mb) as a HD modifier for short days on this chromosome. Our nearest significant haplotype, Chr1B-B76-Hap2 (Table 5), is located 61.7 Mb distal from TaFT-B3, being slightly farther than the critical value of 0.1 for LD decay estimated as 50 Mb [41].

On the other hand, [49] showed that loss of function mutants of the PHYTOCLOCK 1 (WPCL1) gene, located at 740.1Mb on chromosome 3A, were associated with extra-early flowering time. We detected four haplotypes on chromosome 3A associated with HD. Our nearest significant haplotype, Chr3A-B-Hap4 (Table 5), is located 39.5Mb proximal to WPCL1 positioning WPCL1 as candidate for the Chr3A-B-Hap4 HD association.

Finally, no significant associations were detected for HD with the genes Vrn-A1 (5A) [50], Vrn-B1 (5B), Vrn-D1 (5D) [51] and Ppd-B1 (2B) [52], indicating that this set of genes did not appear to affect heading time in our cultivar collection. The most likely explanation is that may come from the field conditions where the collection was evaluated, with satisfied vernalization requirements, or potentially high epistatic interactions among vernalization genes, causing difficulties in the detection of minor effects on flowering time.

In the case of PH, we did not find significant associations between the trait and the molecular markers for the “green revolution” dwarfism genes Rht-B1 and Rht-D1, described by [53]. Although the collection presented a wide variation in PH, it should be mentioned that the wheat collection used in our study is mainly composed of semi-dwarf elite germplasm and that the Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 genes are balanced.

Within the 51 significant associations detected, the chromosome 1B haplotype Chr1B-B17-Hap4 and the chromosome 6B SNP AX-94943227 (234.8 Mb) were particularly noteworthy, since they were significant across the three locations in all analyzed years. To our knowledge, there are no plant height related genes described on these chromosomes, which suggest these consistent PH-HB/SNP associations are promising targets for further gene cloning projects.

We detected four haplotypes on chromosome 5A associated with PH. In a mapping work [54] located the GA-responsive Rht genes Rht9 and Rht12 on chromosome arm 5AL, where Rht9 was linked to the SSR barc151 (558.34 Mb) and Rht12 was located 5.4cM from the SSR Xgwm291 (698.19 Mb). Our haplotype Chr5A-B54-Hap3 mapped at 516.1-527.9 Mb might be associated with Rht9 linked to SSR barc151 at 558.34Mb. However, such an association with Rht12 has to be discarded in our study, since additional PH haplotypes are placed in genetic regions distant to this PH gene.

On chromosome 6A, we detected six haplotypes associated with PH; in particular, the haplotype Chr6A-B54-Hap5 (610.0 Mb) was significantly associated with PH in the three locations and in all evaluation years, except Balcarce 2015. However, none of the associated haplotypes was located in physical positions close to any of the known PH genes on 6A, namely Rht25 (144.0-148.3 Mb) detected by [55] and Rht18/Rht14/Rht24(413.73 Mb) described previously [56].

It is important to highlight that small association panels have been shown to increase both type 1 and type 2 error rates, failing to detect true associations while also generating a higher rate of false positive associations [57]. In this work, we used a small association panel (102 cultivars), but we used a conservative approach for GWAS, in order to reduce spurious associations. However, we may be failing to detect genomic regions that have low rates of explanation of phenotypic values or are found in low frequency in the panel. It is recommended to validate the associations reported in independent populations before being used in wheat breeding programs.

Conclusion

The genetic structure of the Argentinean hexaploid wheat collection was determined by the use of SNP markers, in which a strong relationship was displayed between the subpopulations obtained and the germplasm origin used by the main breeding programs in the country. Based on SNP and gene-related markers physically anchored to the IWGSC Ref Seq v1.0, a haplotype map was constructed, allowing the detection of highly conserved and selected regions like the 1BL/1RS translocation. A GWAS detected ninety-seven chromosome region associated with yield components and adaptation. In the case of yield components, we highlight regions on chromosomes 1A, 2A, 3B, 4A, 5A, 6A and 7A associated with FEh, particularly at higher yield potential locations. For adaptation, the most relevant effect on HD was the Ppd-D1 gene on chromosome 2D, being the main determinant in the variations in the life cycle of the Argentinean wheats. The use of the IWGSC Ref Seq v1.0 allowed us to precisely compare all detected associated regions with genes and QTLs reported in previous studies.

Methods

Plant material

A previously described [32] set of 102 bread wheat cultivars that includes old (such as cv. Barletta 77 released in 1927) and recent (up to 2010) commercial cultivars were selected from the main wheat breeding companies in Argentina and used for the haplotype block construction and GWAS analysis. Seed stocks were kindly provided by the Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Experimental Station Marcos Juárez, Wheat Germplasm Bank (Marcos Juárez, Argentina).

Genotypic data

The population was genotyped at the Instituto de Genética Veterinaria (IGEVET) Genotyping Laboratory, La Plata, Argentina, using the 35k Axiom Wheat Breeder’s Genotyping Array [22]. Information about the 35k SNPs Axiom array is publicly available in CerealsDB1. SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.10 and/or with more than 10% of missing data were discarded. The polymorphic SNPs were genetically anchored to specific wheat chromosomes according to previously described map information [22]. In a second step, linkage information from three biparental mapping populations was used to anchor new markers to wheat chromosomes. Additionally, several SNPs were anchored by transforming the SNP nucleotide information into numerical format and using this information as a phenotypic value for an association study. SNPs with an association of P ≤ 0.0001 to a chromosome were assigned to it (Additional file 1: Table S1). The physical position of each SNP marker in each wheat chromosome was determined by blasting their flanking sequences against the IWGSC Ref Seq v1.0 genome assembly [21]. Molecular data of markers associated with agronomic traits previously described [32] were also included. In the case of adaptation traits, markers were included for the genes Rht-B1, Rht-D1 [53], Vrn-A1 [50], Vrn-B1, Vrn-D1 [51], Elf3-D1 [58], Ppd-B1 [52] and Ppd-D1 [47]. Regarding diseases, markers for leaf rust resistance genes Lr10 [59], Lr34 [60] and Lr24 [61] were incorporated. Additionally, industrial quality related markers, Ppo-A1, Ppo-D1 [62], R-A1, R-B1, R-D1 [63], Glu-B1al [64], Wx-A1, Wx-B1 [65], Vp1-B3 [66], Glu-A3 [67], PinA-D1 and PinB-D1 [68] were included. Finally, high-molecular-weight glutenin subunit (HMW-GS) loci Glu-A1, Glu-B1and Glu-D1 were characterized based upon the protocol described by [69].

SNP-based haplotype construction

The SNP-based haplotype structure for each wheat chromosome was evaluated using the Haploview 4.2 software package [70]. The package defines haplotype blocks (HB) and provides the number of haplotypes and their physical length (bp) for each block, as well as the number of tagged SNPs based on the solid spine of linkage disequilibrium (LD) (Extend spine if D’ > 0.8). This means that the first and the last marker in a block are in strong LD with the intermediate markers that are not necessarily in LD with each other [18, 70]. The HBs from Haploview were converted to a table by using an in-house python script available on GitHub 2. The script transforms the table file results into a suitable input for the ’Genome Association and Prediction Integrated Tool’ (GAPIT) software [71]. Detailed information about the haplotype map constructed is given in Additional file 4: Table S3.

Field experiments and phenotypic trait assessment

In Marcos Juárez, the field experiments were carried out during 2011 to 2016 (6 years) at INTA Experimental Station Marcos Juárez (32 42 S, 62 07 W, 114 m.a.s.l.). In Azul, the field experiments were carried out during 2013 and 2014 at the Experimental Field of the Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Azul (36 48 S; 59 51 W, 137 m a.s.l.). In Balcarce, the field experiments were carried out during crop seasons 2013, 2014 and 2015 at INTA Experimental Station Balcarce (37 45 S; 55 18 W; 130 m a.s.l.). In all experiments except Marcos Juárez 2011 and Balcarce 2013 a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two replications was used. More detailed information of the field experiments carried out for GWAS is described in Table 6. The collection was evaluated for two crop adaptation traits: heading date (HD) and plant height (PH), and three yield component related traits: fruiting efficiency at harvest (aka spike fertility index; FEh), grain number per spike (GNS) and thousand grain weight (TGW). The HD (in days) was measured from emergence until 50% of the spike had emerged from the flag leaf [72]. The PH (in cm) was determined after maturity as the mean of 10 to 20 randomly selected plants (according to experiment) by measuring the main tiller of each plant from the ground to the top of the spike, excluding awns. At maturity, 5 to 15 random spikes (according to experiment), were sampled. They were cut at the lowest spikelet level, weighed and threshed. Spike chaff dry weight (in g) was calculated as the difference between total spike dry weight before threshing and total grain weight. The FEh (in grains g-1) was calculated at harvest as the quotient between grain number and spike chaff dry weight per sample according to [26]. The GNS was measured as the mean of the total number of grains in the selected spikes. The TGW (in g) was determined by weighing 1000 grains. In MsJz, the phenotypic data was collected using Phenobook software [73]. All the phenotypic data used for GWAS is given in Additional file 5: Table S4.

Table 6.

Description of experiments for the Argentinean hexaploid wheat association mapping collection

Exp. Location Year Blocks Exp. unit Traits phenotyped
1 Azul1 2013 2 One meter row FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH
2 Azul 2014 2 One meter row FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH
3 Balcarce2 20134 1 Half meter row FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH
4 Balcarce 2014 2 Plot5 FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH
5 Balcarce 2015 2 Plot FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH
6 Marcos Juárez3 2011 1 One meter row HD, PH
7 Marcos Juárez 2012 2 One meter row FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH
8 Marcos Juárez 2013 2 One meter row FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH
9 Marcos Juárez 2014 2 Plot FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH
10 Marcos Juárez 2015 2 Plot FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH
11 Marcos Juárez 2016 2 One meter row FEh, TGW, GNS, HD, PH

1Conducted under no nutrient limitations and rainfed conditions with chemical control of pests and fungal diseases. 2 Conducted under no nutrient or water limitations, with chemical control of pests and fungal diseases. 3 Conducted under rainfed conditions without disease control. 4 Five sowing dates were used for all 102 cultivars; heading date information was collected for each cultivar at each sowing date and used for grouping cultivars into three groups of similar heading date. In 2014 and 2015 experiments at Balcarce, each cultivar was sown at one of each three sowing dates, in order for all cultivars to have similar heading date (around the first week of November). 5 Plot: 5m long seven-row plot, with a 0.2m inter-row distance

Statistical analysis

The best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) of traits in each environment were obtained (except for Marcos Juárez 2011 and Balcarce 2013, where no experimental replicates were made) and were used for Pearson’s correlation analyses and broad sense heritability estimates. Broad sense heritability (H2) was estimated using the formula

H2=σG2/σG2+σe2/r 1

where σG2 is the genotypic variance, σE2 is the residual variance, and r is the number of environments. The genotype by environment variance was used as error variance σe2=σGxE2.

Haplotype-based GWAS

GWAS were performed using 4516 haplotypes (from 1268 HB) and 495 informative SNP/gene markers anchored to the wheat genome and the SUPER method [74] implemented in the R package GAPIT [71]. In order to reduce spurious associations, genetic structure in the population level (Q values) was evaluated using R STRUCTURE software [31].The R scripts used for GWAS are available on GitHub 3 From the GWAS for each trait, we selected haplotypes/markers that were significant (P <0.05, marker-wise) at four environments, with at least one environment with highly significant differences (P <0.001). All the haplotypes/markers that satisfied these criteria are presented in Table 5. Based on the formula described in [75], the probability of a haplotype/marker being significant by chance simultaneously for four GWAS was estimated to be less than 1.25E-07(0.05x0.05x0.05x0.001). Based on this number, the probability of at least one error in the 5011 haplotypes/SNPs was estimated as 1 - (1 - 1.25E-07)5011 = 0.00063 (per trait).

Supplementary information

12870_2019_2015_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (3.9MB, xlsx)

Additional file 1 Table S1. Polymorphic SNPs and gene-related molecular markers genetically and physically anchored to IWGSC Ref Seq v1.0. based on 102 Argentinean hexaploid wheats.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (16.6KB, xlsx)

Additional file 2 Table S2. STRUCTURE Q matrix of the 102 Argentinean hexaploid wheats cultivars.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM3_ESM.docx (98.2KB, docx)

Additional file 3 Figure S1. Graphical representation of STRUCTURE Q matrix in the 102 Argentinean hexaploid wheats cultivars.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (1.8MB, xlsx)

Additional file 4 Table S3. Haplotype-based map used for HB characterization and GWAS in the Argentinean hexaploid wheat collection.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (59.7KB, xlsx)

Additional file 5 Table S4. Phenotypic data from Balcarce (2013-2015), Azul (2013-2014) and Marcos Juárez (2011-2016) for FEh, GNS, TGW, HD and PH used in GWAS.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)

Additional file 6 Table S5. Detailed information of the significant associated Haplotypes/markes detected by GWAS for FEh, TGW, GNS, PH and HD using the 102 Argetninean hexaploid wheat collection including all the SNPs/markers ID.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank to the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC) for pre-publication access to the IWGSC RefSeq v1.0. SMLB and JMC were research fellows of the National Council for Science and Technology (CONICET), Argentina. IAR was supported by a grant from Monsanto’s Beachell-Borlaug Scholarship Program. The authors thank Viviana Echenique and Gabriela Tranquilli, leaders of Project PICT-2012-0660 for the financial support of genotyping. The authors acknowledge the technical assistance of Romina Aurelia, Maria Donato, Lorena Cortizo, Mauro Martinez and Horacio Dalla Valle.

Abbreviations

σE2

Error variance

σE2

Residual variance

σG2

Genotypic variance

σGxE2

Genotype by environment variance

bp

Base pair

BLUP

The best linear unbiased predictors

CIMMYT

Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo

FEh

Fruiting efficiency at harvest

GNS

Grain number per spike

GWAS

Genome wide association study

H2

Broad sense heritability

HB

Haplotype block

HD

Heading date

INTA

Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria

ISBP

Insertion site-based polymorphism

IWGSC

International wheat genome sequencing consortium

LD

Linkage disequilibrium

MAF

Minor allele frequency

Mb

Mega base

PH

Plant height

r

Number of environments

RCBD

Randomized complete block design

SNP

Single nucleotide polymorphism

SSR

Simple sequence repeat

TGW

Thousand grain weight

Authors’ contributions

SMLB, IAR, PA, MH, WJR, AP and LV designed the research. SMLB, IAR, JC, LV and WJR carried out the experiments. SMLB, IAR, MD, and LV collected phenotypic data. JC developed the computer programs. SMLB, LV, MBC and JC performed the data analysis. SMLB, LV and JC drafted the manuscript. WJR, PA, MH, and AP were involved in improving the manuscript. All the authors critically read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the following projects: PNBIO1131042 from the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Argentina; FONCYT PICT-2012-0660; CONICET PIP 11420090100291; UNICEN 03/A192; UNICEN 03/A215; and CIC-PBA N 673/06. IAR was supported by a grant from Monsanto’s Beachell-Borlaug Scholarship514 Program.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

IAR was supported by a grant from Monsanto’s Beachell-Borlaug Scholarship Program. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Silvana Marisol LujánBasile and Ignacio Abel Ramirez contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Silvana Marisol Luján Basile, Email: marisol_basile@yahoo.com.ar.

Ignacio Abel Ramírez, Email: iramirez@acacoop.com.ar.

Juan Manuel Crescente, Email: crescente.juan@inta.gob.ar.

Maria Belén Conde, Email: conde.maria@inta.gob.ar.

Melina Demichelis, Email: demichelis.melina@inta.gob.ar.

Pablo Abbate, Email: abbate.pablo@inta.gob.ar.

Ana Clara Pontaroli, Email: pontaroli.ana@inta.gob.ar.

Marcelo Helguera, Email: helguera.marcelo@inta.gob.ar.

Leonardo Sebastián Vanzetti, Email: vanzetti.leonardo@inta.gob.ar.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12870-019-2015-4.

References

  • 1.Ramankutty N, Mehrabi Z, Waha K, Jarvis L, Kremen C, Herrero M, Rieseberg LH. Trends in global agricultural land use: implications for environmental health and food security. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018;69:789–815. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reynolds M, Foulkes MJ, Slafer GA, Berry P, Parry MA, Snape JW, Angus WJ. Raising yield potential in wheat. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(7):1899–918. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hall AJ, Richards RA. Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major grain crops. Field Crops Res. 2013;143:18–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao C, Liu B, Piao S, Wang X, Lobell DB, Huang Y, Huang M, Yao Y, Bassu S, Ciais P, et al. Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(35):9326–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701762114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.García GA, Miralles DJ, Serrago RA, Alzueta I, Huth N, Dreccer MF. Warm nights in the argentine pampas: Modelling its impact on wheat and barley shows yield reductions. Agric Syst. 2018;162:259–68. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Foulkes M.J., Reynolds M.P. Crop Physiology. 2015. Breeding challenge: improving yield potential; pp. 397–421. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Flohr B, Hunt J, Kirkegaard J, Evans J, Swan A, Rheinheimer B. Genetic gains in nsw wheat cultivars from 1901 to 2014 as revealed from synchronous flowering during the optimum period. Eur J Agron. 2018;98:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peltonen-Sainio P, Jauhiainen L, Laurila IP. Cereal yield trends in northern european conditions: Changes in yield potential and its realisation. Field Crops Res. 2009;110(1):85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lopes M, Reynolds M, Manes Y, Singh R, Crossa J, Braun H. Genetic yield gains and changes in associated traits of cimmyt spring bread wheat in a "historic" set representing 30 years of breeding. Crop Sci. 2012;52(3):1123–31. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2011.09.0467. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.François O. Running structure-like population genetic analyses with r. R Tutor Popul Genet U Grenoble-Alpes. 2016:1–9. http://membrestimc.imag.fr/Olivier.Francois/tutoRstructure.pdf. Accessed 13 Sept 2019.
  • 11.Lo Valvo PJ, Miralles DJ, Serrago RA. Genetic progress in argentine bread wheat varieties released between 1918 and 2011: Changes in physiological and numerical yield components. Field Crops Res. 2018;221:314–21. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alonso M, Mirabella N, Panelo J, Cendoya M, Pontaroli A. Selection for high spike fertility index increases genetic progress in grain yield and stability in bread wheat. Euphytica. 2018;214(7):112. doi: 10.1007/s10681-018-2193-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abbate P, Andrade F, Lazaro L, Bariffi J, Berardocco H, Inza V, Marturano F. Grain yield increase in recent argentine wheat cultivars. Crop Sci. 1998;38(5):1203–9. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800050015x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Holland J. Genetic architecture of complex traits in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007;10(2):156–61. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang X, Han B. Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:531–51. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ganal MW, Altmann T, Röder MS. Snp identification in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009;12(2):211–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tian F, Bradbury PJ, Brown PJ, Hung H, Sun Q, Flint-Garcia S, Rocheford TR, McMullen MD, Holland JB, Buckler ES. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet. 2011;43(2):159–62. doi: 10.1038/ng.746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hao C, Wang Y, Chao S, Li T, Liu H, Wang L, Zhang X. The iselect 9 k snp analysis revealed polyploidization induced revolutionary changes and intense human selection causing strong haplotype blocks in wheat. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41247. doi: 10.1038/srep41247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Korte A, Farlow A. The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with gwas: a review. Plant Methods. 2013;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-9-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Qian L, Hickey LT, Stahl A, Werner CR, Hayes B, Snowdon RJ, Voss-Fels KP. Exploring and harnessing haplotype diversity to improve yield stability in crops. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1534. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Appels R, Eversole K, Feuillet C, Keller B, Rogers J, Stein N, Pozniak CJ, Choulet F, Distelfeld A, Poland J, et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018;361(6403):7191. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Allen AM, Winfield MO, Burridge AJ, Downie RC, Benbow HR, Barker GL, Wilkinson PA, Coghill J, Waterfall C, Davassi A, et al. Characterization of a wheat breeders’ array suitable for high-throughput snp genotyping of global accessions of hexaploid bread wheat (triticum aestivum) Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(3):390–401. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mirabella N, Abbate P, Alonso M, Panelo J, Pontaroli A. Identifying traits at crop maturity and models for estimation of lodging susceptibility in bread wheat. Crop Pasture Sci. 2019;70(2):95–106. doi: 10.1071/CP17347. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Engledow F, Wadham S. Plant characters on yield. J Agric Sci. 1923;13:390–439. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600003828. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fischer RA. Wheat. potential productivity of field crops under different environments: International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines; 1984, pp. 129–54.
  • 26.Abbate PE, Pontaroli AC, Lázaro L, Gutheim F. A method of screening for spike fertility in wheat. J Agric Sci. 2013;151(3):322–30. doi: 10.1017/S0021859612000068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.González F, Terrile II, Falcón M. Spike fertility and duration of stem elongation as promising traits to improve potential grain number (and yield): variation in modern argentinean wheats. Crop Sci. 2011;51(4):1693–702. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2010.08.0447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mirabella N, Abbate P, Ramirez I, Pontaroli A. Genetic variation for wheat spike fertility in cultivars and early breeding materials. J Agric Sci. 2016;154(1):13–22. doi: 10.1017/S0021859614001245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martino DL, Abbate PE, Cendoya MG, Gutheim F, Mirabella NE, Pontaroli AC. Wheat spike fertility: inheritance and relationship with spike yield components in early generations. Plant Breeding. 2015;134(3):264–70. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fischer R. Wheat physiology: a review of recent developments. Crop Pasture Sci. 2011;62(2):95–114. doi: 10.1071/CP10344. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.François O. Running structure-like population genetic analyses with r. R Tutor Popul Genet U Grenoble-Alpes. 2016;:1–9.
  • 32.Vanzetti LS, Yerkovich N, Chialvo E, Lombardo L, Vaschetto L, Helguera M. Genetic structure of argentinean hexaploid wheat germplasm. Genet Mol Biol. 2013;36(3):391–9. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572013000300014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gomez D, Vanzetti L, Helguera M, Lombardo L, Fraschina J, Miralles DJ. Effect of vrn-1, ppd-1 genes and earliness per se on heading time in argentinean bread wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res. 2014;158:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mater Y, Baenziger S, Gill K, Graybosch R, Whitcher L, Baker C, Specht J, Dweikat I. Linkage mapping of powdery mildew and greenbug resistance genes on recombinant 1RS from ’Amigo’ and ’Kavkaz’ wheat-rye translocations of chromosome 1RS.1AL, Genome. 2004;47(2):292–8. doi: 10.1139/g03-101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Graybosch RA. Uneasy unions: Quality effects of rye chromatin transfers to wheat. J Cereal Sci. 2001;33(1):3–16. doi: 10.1006/jcrs.2000.0336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Singh S, Vikram P, Sehgal D, Burgueño J, Sharma A, Singh SK, Sansaloni CP, Joynson R, Brabbs T, Ortiz C, et al. Harnessing genetic potential of wheat germplasm banks through impact-oriented-prebreeding for future food and nutritional security. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12527. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30667-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bevan MW, Uauy C, Wulff BB, Zhou J, Krasileva K, Clark MD. Genomic innovation for crop improvement. Nature. 2017;543(7645):346. doi: 10.1038/nature22011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Slafer GA, Elia M, Savin R, García GA, Terrile II, Ferrante A, Miralles DJ, González FG. Fruiting efficiency: an alternative trait to further rise wheat yield. Food Energy Secur. 2015;4(2):92–109. doi: 10.1002/fes3.59. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Terrile II, Miralles DJ, González FG. Fruiting efficiency in wheat (triticum aestivum l): Trait response to different growing conditions and its relation to spike dry weight at anthesis and grain weight at harvest. Field Crops Res. 2017;201:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.09.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Guo Z, Chen D, Alqudah AM, Röder MS, Ganal MW, Schnurbusch T. Genome-wide association analyses of 54 traits identified multiple loci for the determination of floret fertility in wheat. New Phytol. 2017;214(1):257–70. doi: 10.1111/nph.14342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Juliana RP, Singh P, Singh PK, Poland JA, Bergstrom GC, Huerta-Espino J, Bhavani S, Crossa J, Sorrells ME. Genome-wide association mapping for resistance to leaf rust, stripe rust and tan spot in wheat reveals potential candidate genes. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3086-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sakuma S, Golan G, Guo Z, Ogawa T, Tagiri A, Sugimoto K, Bernhardt N, Brassac J, Mascher M, Hensel G, et al. Unleashing floret fertility in wheat through the mutation of a homeobox gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(11):5182–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815465116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Su Z, Hao C, Wang L, Dong Y, Zhang X. Identification and development of a functional marker of tagw2 associated with grain weight in bread wheat (triticum aestivum l.) Theor Appl Genet. 2011;122(1):211–23. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1437-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Simmonds J, Scott P, Brinton J, Mestre TC, Bush M, Del Blanco A, Dubcovsky J, Uauy C. A splice acceptor site mutation in tagw2-a1 increases thousand grain weight in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat through wider and longer grains. Theor Appl Genet. 2016;129(6):1099–112. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2686-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ma L, Li T, Hao C, Wang Y, Chen X, Zhang X. Ta gs 5-3a, a grain size gene selected during wheat improvement for larger kernel and yield. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14(5):1269–80. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu J, Xu Z, Fan X, Zhou Q, Cao J, Wang F, Ji G, Yang L, Feng B, Wang T. A genome-wide association study of wheat spike related traits in china. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1584. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Beales J, Turner A, Griffiths S, Snape JW, Laurie DA. A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive ppd-d1a mutant of wheat (triticum aestivum l.) Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115(5):721–33. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0603-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zikhali M, Wingen LU, Leverington-Waite M, Specel S, Griffiths S. The identification of new candidate genes triticum aestivum flowering locus t3-b1 (taft3-b1) and target of eat1 (tatoe1-b1) controlling the short-day photoperiod response in bread wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40(11):2678–90. doi: 10.1111/pce.13018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mizuno N, Kinoshita M, Kinoshita S, Nishida H, Fujita M, Kato K, Murai K, Nasuda S. Loss-of-function mutations in three homoeologous phytoclock 1 genes in common wheat are associated with the extra-early flowering phenotype. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):0165618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yan L, Helguera M, Kato K, Fukuyama S, Sherman J, Dubcovsky J. Allelic variation at the vrn-1 promoter region in polyploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109(8):1677–86. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1796-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fu D, Szűcs P, Yan L, Helguera M, Skinner JS, Von Zitzewitz J, Hayes PM, Dubcovsky J. Large deletions within the first intron in vrn-1 are associated with spring growth habit in barley and wheat. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;273(1):54–65. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1095-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Díaz A, Zikhali M, Turner AS, Isaac P, Laurie DA. Copy number variation affecting the photoperiod-b1 and vernalization-a1 genes is associated with altered flowering time in wheat (triticum aestivum) PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):33234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ellis M, Spielmeyer W, Gale K, Rebetzke G, Richards R. “perfect” markers for the rht-b1b and rht-d1b dwarfing genes in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;105(6-7):1038–42. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ellis M, Rebetzke G, Azanza F, Richards R, Spielmeyer W. Molecular mapping of gibberellin-responsive dwarfing genes in bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;111(3):423–30. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-2008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mo Y, Vanzetti LS, Hale I, Spagnolo EJ, Guidobaldi F, Al-Oboudi J, Odle N, Pearce S, Helguera M, Dubcovsky J. Identification and characterization of rht25, a locus on chromosome arm 6as affecting wheat plant height, heading time, and spike development. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131(10):2021–35. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3130-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ford BA, Foo E, Sharwood R, Karafiatova M, Vrána J, MacMillan C, Nichols DS, Steuernagel B, Uauy C, Doležel J, et al. Rht18 semidwarfism in wheat is due to increased ga 2-oxidasea9 expression and reduced ga content. Plant Physiol. 2018;177(1):168–80. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang H, Smith KP, Combs E, Blake T, Horsley RD, Muehlbauer GJ. Effect of population size and unbalanced data sets on qtl detection using genome-wide association mapping in barley breeding germplasm. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;124(1):111–24. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1691-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zikhali M, Wingen LU, Griffiths S. Delimitation of the earliness per se d1 (eps-d1) flowering gene to a subtelomeric chromosomal deletion in bread wheat (triticum aestivum) J Exp Bot. 2015;67(1):287–99. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schachermayr G, Feuillet C, Keller B. Molecular markers for the detection of the wheat leaf rust resistance gene lr10 in diverse genetic backgrounds. Mol Breed. 1997;3(1):65–74. doi: 10.1023/A:1009619905909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lagudah E, McFadden H, Singh R, Huerta-Espino J, Bariana H, Spielmeyer W. Molecular genetic characterization of the lr34/yr18 slow rusting resistance gene region in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;114(1):21–30. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0406-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Schachermayr G, Messmer M, Feuillet C, Winzeler H, Winzeler M, Keller B. Identification of molecular markers linked to the agropyron elongatum-derived leaf rust resistance gene lr24 in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1995;90(7-8):982–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00222911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.He X, He Z, Zhang L, Sun D, Morris C, Fuerst E, Xia X. Allelic variation of polyphenol oxidase (ppo) genes located on chromosomes 2a and 2d and development of functional markers for the ppo genes in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115(1):47–58. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0539-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Himi E, Maekawa M, Miura H, Noda K. Development of pcr markers for tamyb10 related to r-1, red grain color gene in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2011;122(8):1561–76. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1555-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Butow B, Gale K, Ikea J, Juhasz A, Bedö Z, Tamas L, Gianibelli M. Dissemination of the highly expressed bx7 glutenin subunit (glu-b1al allele) in wheat as revealed by novel pcr markers and rp-hplc. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109(7):1525–35. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1776-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Vanzetti LS, Pflüger LA, Rodríguez-Quijano M, Carrillo JM, Helguera M. Genetic variability for waxy genes in argentinean bread wheat germplasm. Electron J Biotechnol. 2009;12(1):4–5. doi: 10.2225/vol12-issue1-fulltext-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yang Y, Zhao X, Xia L, Chen X, Xia X, Yu Z, He Z, Röder M. Development and validation of a viviparous-1 sts marker for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in chinese wheats. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115(7):971–80. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0624-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhang W, Gianibelli M, Rampling L, Gale K. Characterisation and marker development for low molecular weight glutenin genes from glu-a3 alleles of bread wheat (triticum aestivum. l) Theor Appl Genet. 2004;108(7):1409–19. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1558-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gautier M-F, Aleman M-E, Guirao A, Marion D, Joudrier P. Triticum aestivum puroindolines, two basic cystine-rich seed proteins: cdna sequence analysis and developmental gene expression. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;25(1):43–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00024197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pflüger L, D’Ovidio R, Margiotta B, Pena R, Mujeeb-Kazi A, Lafiandra D. Characterisation of high-and low-molecular weight glutenin subunits associated to the d genome of aegilops tauschii in a collection of synthetic hexaploid wheats. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;103(8):1293–301. doi: 10.1007/s001220100704. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of ld and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2004;21(2):263–5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lipka AE, Tian F, Wang Q, Peiffer J, Li M, Bradbury PJ, Gore MA, Buckler ES, Zhang Z. Gapit: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(18):2397–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 1974;14(6):415–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Crescente JM, Guidobaldi F, Demichelis M, Formica MB, Helguera M, Vanzetti LS. Phenobook: an open source software for phenotypic data collection. GigaScience. 2017;6(4):1–5. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giw019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wang Q, Tian F, Pan Y, Buckler ES, Zhang Z. A super powerful method for genome wide association study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):107684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhang J, Gizaw SA, Bossolini E, Hegarty J, Howell T, Carter AH, Akhunov E, Dubcovsky J. Identification and validation of qtl for grain yield and plant water status under contrasting water treatments in fall-sown spring wheats. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2954-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12870_2019_2015_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (3.9MB, xlsx)

Additional file 1 Table S1. Polymorphic SNPs and gene-related molecular markers genetically and physically anchored to IWGSC Ref Seq v1.0. based on 102 Argentinean hexaploid wheats.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (16.6KB, xlsx)

Additional file 2 Table S2. STRUCTURE Q matrix of the 102 Argentinean hexaploid wheats cultivars.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM3_ESM.docx (98.2KB, docx)

Additional file 3 Figure S1. Graphical representation of STRUCTURE Q matrix in the 102 Argentinean hexaploid wheats cultivars.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (1.8MB, xlsx)

Additional file 4 Table S3. Haplotype-based map used for HB characterization and GWAS in the Argentinean hexaploid wheat collection.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (59.7KB, xlsx)

Additional file 5 Table S4. Phenotypic data from Balcarce (2013-2015), Azul (2013-2014) and Marcos Juárez (2011-2016) for FEh, GNS, TGW, HD and PH used in GWAS.

12870_2019_2015_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)

Additional file 6 Table S5. Detailed information of the significant associated Haplotypes/markes detected by GWAS for FEh, TGW, GNS, PH and HD using the 102 Argetninean hexaploid wheat collection including all the SNPs/markers ID.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.


Articles from BMC Plant Biology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES