Skip to main content
ACR Open Rheumatology logoLink to ACR Open Rheumatology
. 2019 Oct 21;1(10):614–619. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11086

Palindromic Rheumatism Frequently Precedes Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From an Incident Cohort

L Ellingwood 1, O Schieir 2, M F Valois 3, S J Bartlett 3, L Bessette 4, G Boire 5, G Hazlewood 6, C Hitchon 7, E C Keystone 8, D Tin 9, C Thorne 9, V P Bykerk 10, J E Pope 11,; on behalf of CATCH Investigators
PMCID: PMC6917323  PMID: 31872182

Abstract

Background

This multicenter incident cohort aimed to characterize how often early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients self‐report episodic joint inflammation (palindromic rheumatism) preceding ERA diagnosis and which characteristics differentiate these patients from those without prior episodic symptoms.

Methods

Data were from patients with early confirmed or suspected RA (more than 6 weeks and less than 12 months) enrolled in the Canadian Early ArThritis CoHort (CATCH) between April 2017 to March 2018 who completed study case report forms assessing joint pain and swelling prior to ERA diagnosis. Chi‐square and t tests were used to compare characteristics of patients with and without self‐reported episodic joint inflammation prior to ERA diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic and clinical measures associated with past episodic joint inflammation around the time of ERA diagnosis.

Results

A total of 154 ERA patients were included; 66% were female, and mean (SD) age and RA symptom duration were 54 (15) years and 141 (118) days. Sixty‐five (42%) ERA patients reported a history of episodic joint pain and swelling, half of whom reported that these symptoms preceded ERA diagnosis by over 6 months. ERA patients with past episodic joint inflammation were more often female, had higher income, were seropositive, had more comorbidities, fewer swollen joints, and lower Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) around the time of ERA diagnosis (P < 0.05). These associations remained significant in multivariable regression adjusting for other sociodemographic and RA clinical measures.

Conclusion

Almost half of ERA patients experienced episodic joint inflammation prior to ERA diagnosis. These patients were more often female, had higher income, and presented with milder disease activity at ERA diagnosis.


Significance & Innovation.

What is already known about this subject?

  • Palindromic rheumatism is considered an at‐risk phenotype for the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

  • The prevalence of palindromic rheumatism, how frequently it precedes RA, and traits of patients with palindromic rheumatism preceding RA are largely uncharacterized.

What does this study add?

  • More than 40% of early RA patients report experiencing episodic joint inflammation prior to RA diagnosis (palindromic rheumatism).

  • Patients with prior episodes of inflammatory joint symptoms are more likely female, seropositive, have higher income, more comorbidities, and lower disease activity.

How might this impact clinical practice?

  • Study findings have implications for earlier recognition of RA in routine clinical practice, particularly for patients with more insidious or milder disease activity at RA onset.

Introduction

Palindromic rheumatism (PR) constitutes transient acute attacks of self‐resolving articular and/or periarticular inflammation without radiographic damage 1, 2, 3, 4. Although it is debated whether PR is part of the spectrum of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), estimated rates of PR progression to RA range from 50% to 67%, and PR is widely considered an at‐risk phenotype for development of RA 5, 6, 7.

The prevalence of PR and how frequently it precedes RA is largely uncharacterized, and the median length of time before RA diagnosis is unknown. In one study, less than 3% of patients with musculoskeletal disorders seen by rheumatologists had PR 8. PR may be more common than previously recognized. In a Canadian retrospective study of 145 newly referred rheumatology patients, 51 were diagnosed with PR and 94 with RA, providing a relative estimate 9. Another study from the United Kingdom found that of 100 RA patients, 1 in 4 had transient symptoms for more than 6 months, often over a year, before definite RA 10. The purpose of this study was to determine how frequently patients with early RA (ERA) experience episodic joint inflammation prior to ERA diagnosis and to compare characteristics of patients with ERA who did versus did not report past episodes of joint inflammation.

Methods

Data source

The present study was an analysis of an incident cohort of early classifiable or suspected RA according to their rheumatologist enrolled in the Canadian Early ArThritis CoHort (CATCH) from April 2017 to March 2018 11. The CATCH study involves 16 sites. CATCH inclusion criteria are age over 18 years; between 6 weeks and 12 months of persistent synovitis at enrollment; two or more swollen joints or one swollen metacarpophalangeal or proximal interphalangeal joint; and one or more of the following: positive rheumatoid factor (RF), positive anti‐citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), morning stiffness of at least 45 minutes, response to nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, or painful metatarsophalangeal squeeze test. All CATCH participants provided signed informed consent, the data were anonymmized, and the CATCH study was approved by each local site's research ethics board. Additionally, the study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Summary data are available upon request.

Measures

History of joint symptoms was assessed with the following questions: 1) Have you had other similar episodes of pain and swelling in your joints in the past (Yes/No)? 2) How long ago did the past episode(s) happen? (within the past 6 months, more than 6 months ago); and 3) Did the other episode(s) come and go (Yes/No)?

Other variables included sociodemographic variables: age, sex, ethnicity (Caucasian or minority), annual household income, smoking, and education (above high school); clinical variables: RA symptom duration in months, fulfilment of 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria, ACPA and RF serology, physician and patient global assessments, 28 swollen and tender joint counts, the composite Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Multi‐Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MD‐HAQ), comorbidity was collected for the composite rheumatic disease comorbidity index (RDCI) and also for osteoarthritis (OA), fibromyalgia, and back or spine arthritis.

Analysis

Descriptive, chi‐square, and t tests were used to compare differences in baseline characteristics in patients with versus without a reported history of PR as defined by prior transient inflammatory joint symptoms. Simple and multivariable logistic regression with backward selection (P < 0.2) were used to identify crude and adjusted predictors of episodic symptoms. SAS version 9.4 and SPSS version 25.0 were used.

Results

Over the course of 1 year, 201 patients were recruited and 47 of those were excluded because of missing data for joint symptom questions, leaving 154 patients for analyses. Included patients had similar demographic and RA clinical characteristics as those excluded except that those excluded were less likely to be Caucasian and had more comorbidities (Supplemental Table 1).

Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics comparing patients with and without PR prior to ERA diagnosis. Two‐thirds of patients were female, mean (SD) age was 54 (15) years, and mean (SD) physician‐reported symptom duration was 141 (118) days; 83 (54%) reported having previous joint pain and swelling prior to current episode; 65 (42%) endorsed prior joint pain and swelling that would “come and go,” of whom 31 (48%) reported joint symptoms that occurred more than 6 months prior to ERA diagnosis. Patients reporting PR (history episodic inflammatory joint symptoms) were more often female, seropositive, had higher average RDCI scores, and OA and back or spine arthritis. They had lower swollen joint counts, physician global assessment, and baseline CDAI (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in physician‐reported RA symptom duration.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of ERA patients who did vs did not report transient joint episodes prior to ERA diagnosisa

Variable Total Sample (n = 154) ERA Patients Who Did NOT Report Prior Transient Joint Episodes (N = 89) ERA Patients Who Reported Prior Transient Joint Episodes (N = 65) P value
MD‐reported symptom duration (days), median (IQR) 141 (118) 142 (130) 140 (118) 0.549
Age (years), mean (SD); range 54 (15); 18‐80 54 (15); 18‐80 54 (15); 22‐80 0.971
Female (%) 101 (66) 51 (57) 50 (77) 0.011
Caucasian (%) 124 (80) 73 (82) 51 (78) 0.582
Education (>high school) (%) 84 (55) 46 (52) 38 (58) 0.447
Household income (>$50 000) (%) 69 (59) 33 (52) 36 (68) 0.073
Smoking (%)        
Never 66 (44) 42 (49) 24 (38) 0.167
Current smoker 28 (19) 12 (14) 16 (25) 0.086
Past smoker 56 (37) 32 (37) 24 (38) 0.971
Rheumatic disease comorbidity index (SD) 1.4 (1.5) 1.1 (1.3) 1.7 (1.7) 0.021
Fibromyalgia (%) 4 (3) 1 (1) 3 (5) 0.311
Osteoarthritis (%) 33 (24) 13 (16) 20 (32) 0.017
Back/spine symptoms (%) 42 (29) 14 (17) 28 (45) <0.001
2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (%) 127 (83) 74 (83) 53 (82) 0.713
Seropositivity (RF or ACPA) 101 (67) 50 (58) 51 (79) 0.009
RF positive (%) 81 (59) 38 (49) 42 (70) 0.012
ACPA positive (%) 79 (64) 40 (56) 39 (74) 0.048
Patient global assessment (SD) (0‐10) 6 (3) 5 (3) 6 (3) 0.345
MD global assessment (SD) (0‐10) 5 (2) 6 (2) 5 (3) <0.001
Swollen joint count (SD) (0‐28) 7 (5) 8 (6) 5 (4) 0.001
Tender joint count (SD) (0‐28) 8 (6) 8 (6) 6 (6) 0.063
CDAI (SD) 25.2 (12.5) 27.5 (12.4) 22.1 (12.0) 0.011
MD‐HAQ (SD) 0.9 (0.6) 0.8 (0.6) 0.9 (0.6) 0.198
Oral corticosteroids (%) 24 (16) 15 (17) 9 (14) 0.611
Parenteral corticosteroids (%) 38 (25) 20 (23) 18 (28) 0.458

Bold indicate stat significant values (P < 0.05).

Abbreviation: ACR, American College of Rheumatology; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; ERA, early rheumatoid arthritis; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; IQR, intraquartile range; MD, medical doctor; MD‐HAQ, Multi‐Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire.

a

Chi Square and t test were used where appropriate.

Results of regression models are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Unadjusted predictors of prior episodic inflammatory joint symptoms included female sex, higher income, seropositivity, comorbid OA, back/spine arthritis, higher RDCI, and lower swollen joint count, physician global assessment, and CDAI (P < 0.05). Female sex, higher income, seropositivity, back or spine arthritis, and lower CDAI remained significant in multivariable regression.

Table 2.

Univariable logistic regression examining associations between ERA baseline characteristics and history of transient joint episodes prior to ERA diagnosis

Variable Odds Ratio 95% CI P Value
Age 1.000 0.978, 1.021 0.971
Female 2.484 1.217, 5.070 0.012
Caucasian 0.798 0.358, 1.780 0.582
Education (>high school) 1.316 0.690, 2.508 0.405
Income (>$50 000) 2.107 1.098, 4.040 0.025
Current smoker 2.095 0.914, 4.804 0.081
Rheumatic disease comorbidity index 1.303 1.044, 1.626 0.019
OA 2.601 1.174, 5.763 0.019
Back/spine 4.118 1.923, 8.815 <0.001
RA symptom duration 1.001 0.997, 1.005 0.547
Seropositivity (RF or ACPA) 2.623 1.264, 5.444 0.010
RF positive 2.452 1.207, 4.981 0.013
ACPA positive 2.159 1.000, 4.663 0.050
Patient global assessment 1.065 0.935, 1.213 0.343
MD global assessment 0.771 0.668, 0.891 <0.001
Swollen joint count 0.893 0.830, 0.961 0.002
Tender joint count 0.950 0.899, 1.003 0.065
CDAI 0.963 0.935, 0.992 0.014
MD‐HAQ 1.495 0.811, 2.757 0.197

Bold indicate stat significant values (P < 0.05).

Abbreviation: ACPA, anticitrullinated protein antibodies; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CI, confidence interval; ERA, early rheumatoid arthritis; MD, medical doctor; MD‐HAQ, Multi‐Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire; OA, osteoarthritis; RF, rheumatoid factor.

Table 3.

Multivariable logistic regression examining associations between ERA baseline characteristics and history of transient joint episodes prior to ERA diagnosisa

Variable N = 133
OR 95% CI
Age (years) 0.997 0.966, 1.029
Female 3.303 1.165, 9.366
Household income (>$50 000) 2.539 1.063, 6.063
Rheumatic disease comorbidity index 1.347 0.994, 1.825
Osteoarthritis 3.102 0.996, 9.658
Back/spine symptoms 2.974 1.145, 7.723
Seropositivity 3.641 1.343, 9.873
CDAI 0.949 0.912, 0.988

Bold indicate stat significant values (P < 0.05).

Abbreviation: CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CI, confidence interval; ERA, early rheumatoid arthritis; MD, medical doctor; OR, odds ratio.

a

Nonsignificant variables: current smoker, MD global assessment. Twenty‐one patients were excluded from multivariate analysis because of missing data.

discussion

In this study of patients with ERA, patients frequently reported PR prior to RA. Sociodemographic and clinical measures associated with past inflammatory joint symptoms in adjusted models were female sex, higher income, seropositivity, comorbid back or spine arthritis, and lower CDAI disease activity. There were no differences in RA symptom duration between those with and without PR.

Results of the present study (20% reported PR more than 6 months prior to ERA and more than 40% within 1 year prior to diagnosis) are consistent with a previously reported rate of 23% and 50% 9, 10 but higher than two other studies (15% of 158 patients with RA had PR 12 and 5% in another study 2).

Consistent with the reported associations with seropositivity and female sex in the present study, seropositivity has been associated with PR progression to RA 3, 13, 14, 15; in a 10‐year prognostic study of PR, female patients with positive RF and hand involvement had an 8‐fold risk of developing connective tissue disease relative to patients with one or fewer of these traits 8. Seropositive RA is also associated with progression to more erosive and severe disease 16, 17, 18, 19; thus, early clinical recognition of this patient group has important prognostic implications.

Patients with prior episodic inflammatory joint symptoms also had more comorbidities with higher RDCI comorbidity counts, more frequent OA, and self‐reported back or spine arthritis. Although cervical spine involvement is thought to be rare at onset of RA, it may be an early manifestation of RA and has been reported as a presenting symptom 20. Moreover, the presence of a concomitant musculoskeletal condition such as OA or fibromyalgia has previously been identified as the most significant predictor of prolonged time from RA symptom onset to treatment 21. A larger sample size is required to further assess the likely association of OA and RDCI with palindromic symptoms.

Additionally, markers of disease activity were lower in this subset of patients, suggesting a possible insidious onset or milder disease activity at RA diagnosis, including lower swollen joint count, physician global assessment, and CDAI. In another Canadian cohort study comparing PR patients with new RA patients, inflammatory markers were generally higher in new‐onset RA but were often also elevated in PR 9. Our findings suggest that patients with self‐reported transient symptoms have relatively lower disease activity at study enrollment. In clinical practice, the finding that ERA patients frequently experience transient initial joint symptoms can help inform early recognition of disease, which initially may be more insidious or milder in this patient group.

Few studies have quantified patient symptoms preceding ERA diagnosis 22, 23 or characterized PR preceding ERA 5, 6, 7. The strengths of this study are its unique quantitative characterization of episodic inflammatory symptoms prior to ERA and inclusion of ERA patients from multiple centers. A limitation of this study is the exclusion of 47 patients for missing data for joint symptom questions. Another limitation is that previous joint pain and swelling was reported by patients rather than physician‐verified episodes of inflammatory arthritis; we are thus unable to verify whether patient‐reported symptoms constituted inflammatory arthritis, previous PR, or may be attributable to comorbid musculoskeletal conditions such as OA. Our findings suggest that half of the patients with early onset RA had an episodic prodrome of inflammatory arthritis symptoms before the onset of RA.

As defined by Pasero and Barbieri 2, PR involves more than five recurrent attacks over 2 years of sudden onset monoarthritis, with physician verification of one attack; negative radiographs, RF, and inflammatory markers; attacks in three or more different joints; and exclusion of other arthritides. Hannonen et al expanded their definition to include mono‐ or polyarthritis and periarticular tissue inflammation lasting anywhere from a few hours to 1 week and excluded radiographic and serologic criteria 3; similar criteria were proposed by Guerne and Weisman 4, including a 6‐month history of these brief symptoms and no radiographic damage. Diagnostic criteria for PR were not included in the current study of patient‐reported transient symptoms of joint pain and swelling that would come and go. Despite this, there are differences for patients with episodic symptoms by self‐report such as more seropositivity. Further research is required to characterize physician‐diagnosed PR and its relationship with RA onset.

Recently, cases of RA have been described with overlapping autoimmune and autoinflammatory clinical phenotypes characterized by abrupt inflammatory attacks with fever, joint swelling, erythema, and elevated inflammatory markers 24. Our finding that patient‐reported episodic inflammatory joint symptoms are prevalent amongst patients with ERA further highlights the importance of characterizing the phenotypic variability of ERA.

Patients with ERA frequently reported experiencing transient episodes of inflammatory arthritis prior to RA diagnosis. ERA patients who endorsed a history of joint symptoms that come and go prior to RA diagnosis were more likely female and seropositive with higher income and lower CDAI at ERA cohort entry, but median ERA duration did not differ. These findings have implications for earlier RA recognition in routine clinical practice, particularly for patients with more insidious or milder disease activity at RA onset.

Author contributions

L. Ellingwood, O. Schieir, M.F. Valois, S.J. Bartlett, L. Bessette, G. Boire, G. Hazlewood, C. Hitchon, E.C. Keystone, D. Tin, C. Thorne, V.P. Bykerk, and J.E. Pope have made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data. All authors have been involved in drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content and have provided final approval of the version submitted. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Study conception and design

Ellingwood, Schieir, Vykerk, Pope.

Acquisition of data

Bessette, Boire, Hitchon, Keystone, Tin, Thorne, Bykerk, Pope.

Analysis and interpretation of data

Ellingwood, Schieir, Valois, Bartlett, Bessette, Boire, Hazlewood, Hitchon, Keystone, Tin, Thorne, Bykerk, Pope.

Supporting information

 

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the CATCH investigators: Murray Baron, Louis Bessette, Gilles Boire, Vivian Bykerk, Ines Colmegna, Sabrina Fallavollita, Derek Haaland, Paul Haraoui, Glen Hazlewood, Carol Hitchon, Shahin Jamal, Raman Joshi, Ed Keystone, Bindu Nair, Peter Panopoulos, Janet Pope, Laurence Rubin, Carter Thorne, Edith Villeneuve, Michel Zummer.

CATCH INVESTIGATORS

Murray Baron, Louis Bessette, Gilles Boire, Vivian Bykerk, Ines Colmegna, Sabrina Fallavollita, Derek Haaland, Paul Haraoui, Glen Hazlewood, Carol Hitchon, Shahin Jamal, Raman Joshi, Ed Keystone, Bindu Nair, Peter Panopoulos, Janet Pope, Laurence Rubin, Carter Thorne, Edith Villeneuve, Michel Zummer.

The CATCH study was designed and implemented by the investigators and financially supported through unrestricted research grants from: Amgen and Pfizer Canada ‐ Founding sponsors since January 2007; AbbVie Corporation since 2011; Medexus Inc. since 2013; Eli Lilly Canada since 2016, Merck Canada since 2017 and Sandoz, Canada Biopharmaceuticals since 2019. Previously funded by Hoffmann‐LaRoche and Janssen Biotech from 2011‐2016, United Chemicals Belgium Canada and Bristol‐Myers Squibb Canada from 2011‐2018, and Sanofi Genzyme from 2016‐2017.

L. Ellingwood MD: University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; 2O. Schieir, PhD: University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 3M. F. Valois, PhD, S. J. Bartlett, PhD: McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 4L. Bessette, MD: CHU de Québec‐Université Laval, Laval, Quebec, Canada; 5G. Boire, MD: Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie – Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie‐CHUS) and Université de Sherbrooke; 6G. Hazlewood, MD, PhD: University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 7C. Hitchon, MD: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; 8E. C. Keystone, MD: Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 9D. Tin, BScPhm, C. Thorne, MD: Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada; 10V. P. Bykerk, MD: Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 11J. E. Pope, MD, St. Joseph's Health Care London and University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Dr. Bartlett has acted as a consultant for Pfizer, United Chemicals Belgium, Lilly, Novartis. Dr. Bessette has received funding for research from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Roche, United Chemicals Belgium, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis; maintains consulting agreements/advisory board membership with Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Roche, United Chemicals Belgium, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis; and has speaker honoraria agreements with Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Roche, United Chemicals Belgium, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis. Dr. Boire serves on advisory boards for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Pfizer; has spoken for Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer; and has conducted investigator‐initiated studies for Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer. Dr. Hitchon has received research funding from Pfizer and United Chemicals Belgium Canada. Dr. Keystone received funding for research from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi‐Aventis; served consulting agreements/advisory board membership with AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, Bristol‐Myers Squibb Company, Celltrion, Crescendo Bioscience, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, United Chemicals Belgium; and maintained speaker honoraria agreements with Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol‐Myers Squibb Canada, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, United Chemicals Belgium. Dr. Thorne served on the advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi; and as a Consultant for AbbVie, Centocor, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Pfizer; Speaker for Medexus/Medac; conducted investigator‐initiated studies for Amgen, Pfizer; randomized control trials for AbbVie, Celgene, CaREBiodam, Novartis, Pfizer. Dr. Bykerk served as a consultant for Amgen, Pfizer, United Chemicals Belgium, Scipher, Sanofi/Genzyme/Regeneron. Dr. Pope maintained consulting relationships with AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Emerald, Genzyme, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, United Chemicals Belgium; and conducted randomized control trials for Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, United Chemicals Belgium. No other disclosures relevant to this article were reported.

Contributor Information

J. E. Pope, Email: Janet.Pope@sjhc.london.on.ca.

on behalf of CATCH Investigators:

Murray Baron, Louis Bessette, Gilles Boire, Vivian Bykerk, Ines Colmegna, Sabrina Fallavollita, Derek Haaland, Paul Haraoui, Glen Hazlewood, Carol Hitchon, Shahin Jamal, Raman Joshi, Ed Keystone, Bindu Nair, Peter Panopoulos, Janet Pope, Laurence Rubin, Carter Thorne, Edith Villeneuve, and Michel Zummer

References

  • 1. Hench JJ, Rosenberg EF. Palindromic rheumatism. Arch Intern Med 1944;73:293–321. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Pasero G, Barbieri P. Palindromic rheumatism: you just have to think about it! [X]. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1986;4:197–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hannonen P, Möttönen T, Oka M. Palindromic rheumatism. A clinical survey of sixty patients. Scand J Rheumatol 1987;16:413–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Guerne PA, Weisman MH. Palindromic rheumatism: part of or apart from the spectrum of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med 1992;93:451–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Emad Y, Anbar A, Abo‐Elyoun I, El‐Shaarawy N, Al‐Hanafi H, Darwish H, et al. In palindromic rheumatism, hand joint involvement and positive anti‐CCP antibodies predict RA development after 1 year of follow‐up. Clin Rheumatol 2014;33:791–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Koskinen E, Hannonen P, Sokka T. Palindromic rheumatism: longterm outcomes of 60 patients diagnosed in 1967‐84. J Rheumatol 2009;36:1873–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mankia K, Emery P. What can palindromic rheumatism tell us? [review]. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2017;31:90–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gonzalez‐Lopez L, Gamez‐Nava JI, Jhangri GS, Ramos‐Remus C, Russell AS, Suarez‐Almazor ME. Prognostic factors for the development of rheumatoid arthritis and other connective tissue diseases in patients with palindromic rheumatism. J Rheumatol 1999;26:540–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Powell A, Davis P, Jones N, Russell AS. Palindromic rheumatism is a common disease: comparison of new‐onset palindromic rheumatism compared to new‐onset rheumatoid arthritis in a 2‐year cohort of patients. J Rheumatol 2008;35:992–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Jacoby RK, Jayson MI, Cosh JA. Onset, early stages and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical study of 100 patients with 11‐year follow‐up. Br Med J 1973;2:96–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. McKeown E, Bykerk VP, De Leon F, Thorne JC, Hitchon CA, Boire G, Haraoui B, Ferland DS, Keystone EC, Pope JE, on behalf of CATCH Investigators . Quality assurance study of the use of preventative therapies in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in early inflammatory arthritis: results from the CATCH cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012. 10.1093/rheumatology/kes079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Corominas H, Narváez J, Díaz‐Torné C, Salvador G, Gomez‐Caballero ME, de la Fuente D, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic delay of rheumatoid arthritis and its relationship with health care devices in Catalonia: the AUDIT Study. Rheumatol Clin 2016;12:146–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Russell AS, Devani A, Maksymowych WP. The role of anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in predicting progression of palindromic rheumatism to rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2006;33:1240–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tamai M, Kawakami A, Iwamoto N, Arima K, Aoyagi K, Eguchi K. Contribution of anti‐CCP antibodies, proximal interphalangeal joint involvement, HLA‐DRB1 shared epitope, and PADI4 as risk factors for the development of rheumatoid arthritis in palindromic rheumatism. Scand J Rheumatol 2010;39:287–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sanmartí R, Cabrera‐Villalba S, Gómez‐Puerta JA, Ruiz‐Esquide V, Hernández MV, Salvador G, et al. Palindromic rheumatism with positive anticitrullinated peptide/protein antibodies is not synonymous with rheumatoid arthritis. A longterm followup study. J Rheumatol 2012;39:1929–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Berglin E, Johansson T, Sundin U, Jidell E, Wadell G, Hallmans G, et al. Radiological outcome in rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by presence of antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide before and at disease onset, and by IgA‐RF at disease onset. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:453–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Machold KP, Stamm TA, Eberl GJ, Nell VK, Dunky A, Uffmann M, et al. Very recent onset arthritis–clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings during the first year of disease. J Rheumatol 2002;29:2278–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mewar D, Coote A, Moore DJ, Marinou I, Keyworth J, Dickson MC, et al. Independent associations of anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies and rheumatoid factor with radiographic severity of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:R128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Taylor P, Gartemann J, Hsieh J, Creeden J. A systemic review of serum biomarkers of anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide and rheumatoid factor as tests for rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmune Dis 2011;815038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Del Grande M, Del Grande F, Carrino J, Bingham CO III, Louie GH. Cervical spine involvement early in the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014;43:738–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tavares R, Pope JE, Trembay JL, Thorne C, Bykerk VP, Lazovskis J, et al. Time to disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug treatment in rheumatoid arthritis and its predictors: a national, multicenter, retrospective cohort. J Rheumatol 2012;39:2088–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Peerboom D, Van der Elst K, De Cock D, Stouten V, Meyfroidt S, Joly J, et al. FRI0354 The patient trajectory from symptom onset until referral to a rheumatologist. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:554. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Raciborski F, Kłak A, Kwiatkowska B, Batko B, Sochocka‐Bykowska M, Zoń‐Giebel A, et al. Diagnostic delays in rheumatic diseases with associated arthritis. Reumatologia 2017;55:169–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Savic S, Mistry A, Wilson AG, Barcenas‐Morales G, Doffinger R, Emery P, et al. Autoimmune‐autoinflammatory rheumatoid arthritis overlaps: a rare but potentially important subgroup of diseases. RMD Open 2017;3:e000550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 


Articles from ACR Open Rheumatology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES