Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
editorial
. 2019 Dec 17;21(12):1489. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz194

Tackling 1q+ PFA ependymomas

Sameer Agnihotri 1,
PMCID: PMC6917405  PMID: 31846502

See the article by Pierce and Witt et al. in this issue, pp. 1540–1551.

Ependymomas are central nervous system tumors of glial origin. Ependymomas account for approximately 10% of all pediatric CNS tumors, and the frequency is much higher (~30%) in children under the age of 3 years.1–3 Of the 9 DNA methylation molecular subgroups of ependymoma, posterior fossa type A tumors (PFAs) are lethal and lack any persistent genomic alterations, with a few exceptions such as alterations in chromosome X open reading frame 67 (CXORF67; enhancer of zeste homolog inhibitory protein) and gains in chromosome 1q.4-6 As such, PFAs are largely considered an epigenetic driven disease with alterations resulting in DNA cytosine-phosphate-guanine island promoter hypermethylation, gene body hypomethylation, and loss of histone trimethylation (H3K27me3) and active oncogenic super-enhancers (H3K27Ac).7–9 In particular, gains of chromosome 1q have been associated with poor prognosis of PFA patients. Lack of 1q-positive PFA models has hampered testing of therapeutics and discernment of the mechanisms of this disease. In this issue, Foreman and colleagues have generated 2 PFA 1q+ patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models that faithfully recapitulate histologic features of ependymoma, such as small round blue cells with a striped chromatin pattern forming ependymal rosettes.10 Moreover, these models have high expression of CXORF67, lose H3K27me3 expression, and retain 1q gains through serial in vivo passaging. These models also subgroup as ependymomas using a DNA methylation classifier, unlike high-passage cell lines that can drift at the molecular level. Moreover, the authors use these PDX models to demonstrate preclinical testing of radiation and 5-fluorouracil, with radiation extending survival. These PDX models will also allow for exciting possibilities such as establishing relapsed or treatment resistance in vivo. One limitation of this model is the inability to fully study the immune component and its contribution to tumor biology, something that is common for many brain tumor models. The authors will make their models available to the brain tumor community to accelerate research in this field, which will provide an invaluable resource to reliably test new investigational therapies.

References

  • 1. Bouffet E, Tabori U, Huang A, Bartels U. Ependymoma: lessons from the past, prospects for the future. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25(11):1383–1384; author reply 1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. McGuire CS, Sainani KL, Fisher PG. Incidence patterns for ependymoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results study. J Neurosurg. 2009;110(4):725–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rodríguez D, Cheung MC, Housri N, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Camphausen K, Koniaris LG. Outcomes of malignant CNS ependymomas: an examination of 2408 cases through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2005). J Surg Res. 2009;156(2):340–351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Jain SU, Do TJ, Lund PJ, et al. PFA ependymoma-associated protein EZHIP inhibits PRC2 activity through a H3 K27M-like mechanism. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hubner JM, Muller T, Papageorgiou D, et al. EZHIP / CXorf67 mimics K27M mutated oncohistones and functions as an intrinsic inhibitor of PRC2 function in aggressive posterior fossa ependymoma. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21(12):878–889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pajtler KW, Wen J, Sill M, et al. Molecular heterogeneity and CXorf67 alterations in posterior fossa group A (PFA) ependymomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136(2):211–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mack SC, Pajtler KW, Chavez L, et al. Therapeutic targeting of ependymoma as informed by oncogenic enhancer profiling. Nature. 2018;553(7686):101–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bayliss J, Mukherjee P, Lu C, et al. Lowered H3K27me3 and DNA hypomethylation define poorly prognostic pediatric posterior fossa ependymomas. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(366):366ra161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pajtler KW, Witt H, Sill M, et al. Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups. Cancer Cell. 2015;27(5):728–743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pierce AM, Witt DA, Donson AM, et al. Establishment of patient-derived orthotropic xenograft model of 1q+ posterior fossa group A ependymoma. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21(12):1552–1564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES