Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 5;29(24):4231–4240.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.049

Activity dependent nucleation of dynamic microtubules at presynaptic boutons controls neurotransmission

Xiaoyi Qu 1,3, Atul Kumar 1, Heike Blockus 2, Clarissa Waites 1, Francesca Bartolini 1,*
PMCID: PMC6917861  NIHMSID: NIHMS1543285  PMID: 31813605

SUMMARY

Control of microtubule (MT) nucleation and dynamics is critical for neuronal function. Whether MT nucleation is regulated at presynaptic boutons and influences overall presynaptic activity remains unknown. By visualizing MT plus end dynamics at individual excitatory en passant boutons in axons of cultured hippocampal neurons and in hippocampal slices expressing EB3-EGFP and vGlut1-Cherry, we found that dynamic MTs preferentially grow from presynaptic boutons, show biased directionality being almost always oriented towards the distal tip of the axon, and can be induced by neuronal activity. Silencing of γ-tubulin expression reduced presynaptic MT nucleation and depletion of either HAUS1 or HAUS7-augmin subunits increased the percentage of retrograde comets initiated at boutons, indicating that γ-tubulin and augmin are required for activity-dependent de novo nucleation of uniformly distally-oriented dynamic MTs. We analyzed the dynamics of a wide range of axonal organelles as well as synaptic vesicles (SVs) relative to vGlut1+ stable presynaptic boutons in a time window during which MT nucleation at boutons is promoted upon induction of neuronal activity, and found that γ-tubulin-dependent presynaptic MT nucleation controls bidirectional (SV) interbouton transport, and regulates evoked SV exocytosis. Hence, en passant boutons act as hotspots for activity-dependent de novo MT nucleation, which controls neurotransmission by providing dynamic tracks for bidirectional delivery of SVs between sites of neurotransmitter release.

eTOC Blurb

Qu et al. demonstrate that excitatory en passant boutons are hotspots for neuronal activity-induced γ-tubulin- and augmin-dependent oriented MT nucleation, and that the resulting presynaptic de novo nucleated MTs promote inter-bouton SV motility, which is rate-limiting for neurotransmitter release.

INTRODUCTION

Dynamic microtubules (MTs) play a crucial role for rapid forms of axonal and dendritic transport and synaptic transmission [13]. At postsynaptic sites, MT invasion into spines regulate spine morphology, motor/cargo pair transport into spines, and synaptic activity [49].

MT dynamics and organization at presynaptic boutons, however, remains a largely uncharted area due to the limited size of the boutons in most mammalian neurons and loss of dynamic MTs using standard fixation procedures. Classic electron microscopy studies have described the presence of pools of MTs at presynaptic sites in the rat cortex and cerebellum, including synaptic vesicle (SV)-clothed MTs attached to the active zone and peripheral coils of MTs in close contact with presynaptic mitochondria [1016]. These observations suggested that presynaptic MTs may be functionally coupled with synaptic transmission by: (1) driving the interbouton translocation of SVs (2) maintaining the composition and organization of the presynaptic active zone (AZ), (3) contributing to the maturation of postsynaptic receptors by conveying new SVs to be released at certain presynaptic sites [17], (4) anchoring mitochondria at sites of release [14, 18]. Few studies, however, have explored these possibilities using modern imaging approaches. Presynaptic MAP-associated stable MT loops, EB1-labeled dynamic pioneer MTs, and DAAM-dependent stable MT regulation of SV release and AZ morphology have been described at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction [1921]. In addition, a marginal band of modified stable MTs residing in the giant synaptic terminal of the goldfish retinal bipolar neuron mediates mitochondria transport and organization at synaptic terminals [18]. Finally, presynaptic MTs appear to regulate interswelling SV transport in mouse giant calyceal terminals [22], and interbouton dynamic MTs have been recently implicated in Kif1A-dependent delivery of SVs to distal boutons in hippocampal neurons [23]. It remains unknown, however, whether axonal de novo MT nucleation occurs post-development, is required for neurotransmission and a feature of neurons residing in an intact circuit.

Here we describe that dynamic MTs emerge at excitatory presynaptic en passant boutons as a result of restricted γ-tubulin- and augmin-dependent de novo MT nucleation, with γ-tubulin regulating the nucleation density, and augmin directing the uniform, plus-end directed growth towards the distal end of the axon. Moreover, we found that de novo nucleation of dynamic MTs at boutons is conserved in an intact circuit, is stimulated by neuronal activity and regulates neurotransmission by providing dynamic tracks for targeted interbouton transport of SVs.

RESULTS

Dynamic MT plus ends emerge from presynaptic boutons in axons of hippocampal neurons in vitro and ex vivo

We examined the dynamic behavior of presynaptic MTs in axons of pyramidal neurons by transfecting cultured hippocampal neurons (18DIV) with EB3-EGFP and vGlut1-Cherry or VAMP2-Cherry constructs. Fast time-lapse imaging of EB3 labeled MT plus ends allows the quantitative assessment of MT dynamics at or away from individual glutamate release sites labeled with vGlut1-mCherry (Figure 1A and Figure S1A). Presynaptic dynamic MTs were distinguished based on their plus end contact with vGlut1+ boutons and defined as: 1) interbouton MTs that have no contact with the presynaptic markers, or 2) intrabouton MTs that interact with the presynaptic synaptic vesicle marker at any point during their lifetime. Intrabouton MTs were further classified as: (1) nucleating/rescuing (starting) at boutons, (2) undergoing catastrophe/pausing (ending) at the boutons or (3) passing through the bouton (Figure 1A). Based on kymograph analyses of EB3 comet motion relative to the stable pool of two distinct presynaptic markers (vGlut1 and VAMP2; Figure S1A), we found a higher density of longer lived intrabouton MTs than interbouton MTs in untreated neurons (Figure 1B and Figure S1A,B). When we further analyzed the pool of intrabouton MTs that end or start at a bouton by measuring their observed frequencies compared to their relative probability predicted by chance, we found a significantly higher frequency of EB3 comets starting rather than ending at presynaptic boutons (Figure 1C). This suggests that MT nucleation labeled by EB3 comets are frequently initiated at presynaptic boutons. To examine if this result is also observed in situ at synapses in a native circuit, we performed comparable time-lapse imaging of EB3-labeled dynamic MTs in close contact with stable vGlut1-labeled excitatory presynaptic boutons in the CA1 region of acute hippocampal slices isolated from 21 day old mice that had been in utero co-electroporated with EB3-EGFP and vGlut1-mCherry at E15.5 (Figure 1D,E and Video S1). We observed a similar level of increase in frequency of EB3 comets starting but not ending at boutons compared to predicted random probability (Figure 1F), confirming the preferential regulation of EB3 comets initiating at presynaptic boutons ex vivo where cellular architecture and synaptic connectivity is largely intact.

Figure 1. Dynamic MT plus ends initiate at presynaptic boutons upon induction of neuronal activity.

Figure 1.

(A) Representative maximum projection of spinning disk confocal fluorescence images and kymographs of untreated hippocampal neurons (21DIV) transfected with EB3-EGFP (EB3) and vGlut1-mCherry (vGlut) 24h prior to live imaging (Figure S1A,B). Shown by arrows are the classifications of axonal dynamic MTs in inter- and intrabouton MTs as described. (B) Comet density and lifetime of intrabouton and interbouton EB3 comets in neurons treated as in (A). (C) Probability of EB3 comets starting or ending at vGlut+ stable puncta from experimental observations or predicted random events. Experimental probability refers to the observed frequency of EB3 starting or ending at vGlut+ stable puncta. Predicted probability refers to the chance of any EB3 comet to randomly start or end at vGlut and it was calculated by taking the ratio of the observed number of vGlut+ stable puncta × the average diameter of a vGlut+ stable punctum (1μm) / axonal length (μm). (D) Representative maximum projection of spinning disk confocal fluorescence images of an acute hippocampal slice in the CA1 region from 21 day old mice electroporated with EB3-EGFP and vGlut1-mCherry at E15.5. vGlut1-mCherry channel under a 20x objective is shown and the white dotted box indicates the axonal region selected for live imaging using a 60x objective. (E) Representative maximum projection of spinning disk confocal fluorescence image and kymographs of an axon from boxed region in D (Video S1). Asterisks indicate comet tracks initiating from vGlut+ stable boutons. (F) Probability of EB3 comets starting or ending at vGlut+ stable puncta from experimental observations or predicted random events in axons from acute hippocampal slices. (G,I) Representative kymographs of hippocampal neurons (21DIV) transfected with EB3 and vGlut and pretreated with 50μM of the NMDA receptor antagonist D-AP5 6–12h prior to imaging, followed by a 1min washout (w/o) and incubation with 20μM of the GABAa receptor antagonist bicuculline up to 30min (G) (Figure S1CF and Video S2), or directly treated with 50ng/mL BDNF for 1min (I) (Figure S1G,H and Video S3). (H, J) Subclassified comet density for intrabouton MTs measured in hippocampal neurons treated as in G or I for the indicated times. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001 by two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests (B, C, F: N = 6–8 axons; H, J: N = 6–9 axons). NS, non significant.

We tested whether initiation of EB3 comets at boutons was regulated by action potential (AP)-driven neuronal activity, and measured EB3 comet density starting at vGlut1+ boutons upon either acute AP5/bicuculline treatment to increase AP firing (Figure 1G,H, Figure S1C,E, and Video S2) or BDNF-induced neuronal activation (Figure 1I,J, Figure S1G,H, and Video S3). Strikingly, both treatments resulted in a significant and specific increase in the density of comets initiating at vGlut1+ boutons starting after 1min of treatment, but not in D-AP5 washout or untreated control conditions (Figure S1D). In addition, the percentage of nucleated comets reaching the next distal bouton increased by 3-fold upon acute neuronal firing as we observed that the MTs that started at a bouton preferentially reached to the next bouton rather than stopping before or passing through the next bouton (Figure S1F). Together, these data demonstrate that initiation of dynamic MT plus ends preferentially occurs at presynaptic sites, shows biased directionality being almost always oriented towards the distal tip of the axon, and can be induced by neuronal activity.

Activity-promoted initiation of distally oriented dynamic MT plus ends at boutons results from γ-tubulin and augmin-dependent de novo MT nucleation

The increase in distally oriented EB3 comets could either result from de novo nucleation by γ-tubulin or from polymerization from preexisting MTs by the activity of MT rescue factors. In axons of developing neurons, γ-tubulin is required for acentrosomal MT organization and the augmin complex interacts with γTuRC to control MT distal polarity [24, 25]. However, whether axonal MT nucleation in the shaft and/or at presynaptic contacts occurs in axons of neurons with mature synapses is currently unknown. First, we examined endogenous γ-tubulin localization relative to the presynaptic marker synapsin-1 in 21DIV hippocampal neurons, and found that γ-tubulin signal co-localized with synapsin-1+ puncta ~2.5 fold more than GAPDH cytosolic control (Figure 2AC). Similarly, ~80% of exogenously expressed γ-tubulin-emerald co-localized with stable vGlut1-Cherry+ (vGlut) puncta in 21DIV hippocampal neurons compared to ~50% of emerald control (Figure S2A,B).

Figure 2. Neuronal activity induces de novo nucleation of distally oriented dynamic MTs through γ-tubulin and augmin function at presynaptic boutons.

Figure 2.

(A) Maximum projection of laser scanning confocal fluorescence images acquired with an Airyscan detector in hippocampal neurons (21DIV) fixed and stained for γ-tubulin, HAUS7, GAPDH and synapsin-1 (Syn) (Figure S2A,B). White arrows indicate signals co-localizing with Syn. (B) Normalized intensity of line scan of axons shown in (A) and indicated by arrows. (C) Manders’ coefficients of Syn+ puncta co-localizing with γ-tubulin, HAUS7 or GAPDH. M1 refers to the fraction of Syn+ puncta overlapping with γ-tubulin, HAUS7 or GAPDH; M2 refers to the fraction of γ-tubulin, HAUS7 or GAPDH overlapping with Syn+ puncta. (D, F) Quantification of EB3 comet density in axons and dendrites (D) and representative kymographs (E) of EB3 comets in axons of hippocampal neurons (20DIV) infected with noncoding control (shNC) or shRNA against γ-tubulin (shγ-tub #1 or shγ-tub #2) for 6d (Figure S2CF). (F) Quantification of subclassified EB3 comet density relative to stable vGlut+ puncta in axons of hippocampal neurons as in (E) (Figure S2G). (G) Quantification of subclassified EB3 comet density relative to stable vGlut+ puncta in axons of hippocampal neurons (20DIV) infected with shNC or shγ-tub #2 for 6d and rescued by co-transfecting emerald control or human γ-tubulin-emerald that is resistant to lentiviral knockdown with EB3-tdTomato and vGlut1-mTAGBFP2 24h prior to live imaging (Figure S2HJ). (H) Quantification of subclassified EB3 comet density relative to stable vGlut+ puncta of hippocampal neurons (18DIV) infected with shNC or shγ-tub#1 or #2 for 4d and transfected with EB3-EGFP (EB3) and vGlut1-mCherry 24h prior to live imaging. Neurons were pretreated with D-AP5 6–12h prior to imaging, followed by a washout and incubation with bicuculline for 1–10min (+Bic). (I) Kymographs of hippocampal neurons (21DIV) infected with shNC or shRNAs against HAUS1 or HAUS7 for 7d (Figure S2K,L) and transfected with EB3-EGFP (EB3) and vGlut1-mCherry (vGlut) 24h prior to live imaging (Video S4). Red arrows show a retrogradely oriented EB3 comet initiating from a bouton. (J) Quantification of intra- and interbouton comet density in neurons treated as in (I). (K) Quantification of the percentage of retrograde comets and retrograde comets starting at boutons of neurons as in (H). * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001 by Mann Whitney test (C: N = 10 axons), Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests (D, F: N = 10=12 axons; G: N = 5 axons; J, K: N= 6–7 axons), and two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test (H: N= 10–12 axons). NS, non significant.

When we knocked down endogenous γ-tubulin in hippocampal neurons for 6d with 2 different shRNAs, we achieved either ~50% (shγ-tub #1) or ~60% (shγ-tub #2) protein depletion and observed a significant decrease in comet density, growth rates, catastrophe/pausing and rescue frequencies of EB3-EGFP or endogenous EB3 puncta and dynamic MTs in both axons and dendrites (Figure 2D and Figure S2CJ). Interestingly, the decrease in comet density in axons was most significantly from loss of EB3 comets starting at presynaptic boutons (Figure 2E,F) and completely rescued by re-expressing shRNA-resistant human γ-tubulin-emerald but not its emerald control (Figure 2G). Silencing of γ-tubulin for 4d, however, a condition that did not interfere with comet density or MT stability in unstimulated neurons (Figure 2H and Figure S2I,J), significantly abrogated only the increase in the density of EB3 comets starting at boutons upon induction of neuronal activity (Figure 2H). These data strongly indicate that dynamic MTs initiating at excitatory boutons are a result of γ-tubulin dependent de novo nucleation and that presynaptic boutons are hotspots for activity-evoked MT nucleation in axons.

Nearly all newly nucleated MTs at presynaptic boutons displayed a biased growth orientation with 96.4% of total intrabouton comets (N=55) and 100% of the comets initiating at boutons (N=24) moving towards the distal tip of the axon. The augmin complex regulates the polarity of γ-tubulin-nucleated MTs in non-neuronal cells and in axons of developing neurons, with γ-tubulin providing the nucleating material and the augmin complex being important for the maintenance of uniform polarity of axonal MTs [24, 25]. We found that the endogenous augmin complex subunit HAUS7 co-localized with synapsin-1+ boutons more significantly than cytosolic GAPDH (Figure 2AC). In addition, silencing of the augmin complex expression by knocking down subunits HAUS1 or HAUS7 to an extent (~40% of protein depletion) (Figure S2K and L) that had no effect on comet density per se, significantly increased the percentage of retrograde comets, almost all of which initiated at boutons (Figure 2IK and Video S4).

Collectively, these data indicate that γ-tubulin and augmin are preferentially localized at excitatory en passant boutons where they are required for activity-dependent de novo nucleation of uniformly distally-oriented dynamic MTs.

MT nucleation at boutons is required for SV interbouton bidirectional motility and neurotransmission

We investigated whether de novo nucleated dynamic MTs at boutons could provide the tracks for activity-evoked motility of axonal cargos [2629]. To this end, we analyzed the dynamics of a wide range of axonal organelles as well as SVs relative to vGlut1+ stable presynaptic boutons in a time window during which we observed MT nucleation at boutons upon induction of neuronal activity. No substantial change was detected in Rab5 (early endosome marker; Figure S3A), Rab7 (late endosome marker; Figure S3B), LAMP1 (lysosome marker; Figure S3C), or mitochondria dynamics (Figure S3D), indicating that motility of these organelles is not immediately affected by activation of neuronal activity induced by bicuculline. We observed, however, a significant increase in the percentage of motile vGlut1+, synaptophysin+ and Arl8+ SVs that would start or end at stable presynaptic boutons (Figure 3AD and Figure S3I and J) with no preference in the direction of the movement (Figure S3E, F and K). We measured and plotted the % of vGlut+ SVs that ended, started or started/ended at a bouton upon evoked MT nucleation and found a 15% increase in the pool of SVs that would end at a bouton and almost a 3 fold increase in the % of SVs that would start at a bouton and reach to the next one (Figure 3D). Interestingly, we observed a very similar fold increase in the density of comets initiated at one bouton and reaching to the next distal one (Figure S1F), suggesting the bidirectional interbouton transport of SVs upon neuronal stimulation is regulated by de novo nucleated MTs that provide tracks for the targeted delivery of pools of SVs between neighboring boutons.

Figure 3. MT nucleation at boutons is required for bidirectional SV interbouton movement stimulated by neuronal activity.

Figure 3.

(A-D) Representative kymographs (A) and quantification of the percentage of moving vGlut+ (B) or synaptophysin+ (SYP) (C) puncta and percentage of moving vGlut+ puncta starting and/or ending at boutons out of moving vGlut+ puncta population (D) in untreated hippocampal neurons (18DIV) or AP5 pretreated neurons before and after a washout with bicuculline. Neurons were transfected with EB3-EGFP and vGlut1-mCherry (B) or EB3-tdTomato and SYP-Venus (C), and vGlut1-mTAGBFP2 24h prior to live imaging (Figure S3AF, IK). (E, G, I) Representative kymographs of vGlut+ (E), SYP+ (G), or Arl8b+ (I) puncta in hippocampal neurons (18DIV) infected with noncoding control (shNC) or shRNA against γ-tubulin (shγ-tub #2) for 4d and treated as in A, B, or transfected with EB3-tdTomato and Arl8b-EGFP (I) (Figure S3G,H,L). (F, H, J) Quantification of the percentage of moving vGlut+ (F), SYP+ (H), or Arl8b+ (J) puncta and the percentage of moving tracks starting or ending at boutons out of moving vGlut+ (F), SYP+(H) and Arl8b+(J) puncta populations in hippocampal neurons treated as in E, G, or I. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001 by Mann-Whitney tests comparing untreated and AP5 washout with bicuculline, and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests comparing before and after AP5 washout with bicuculline (N = 8–12 axons).

To further understand whether local SV transport is dependent on de novo MT nucleation, we examined the mobile pool of vGlut1+, synaptophysin+ and Arl8b+ SVs in neurons depleted of γ-tubulin expression for 4d to levels that would only affect activity evoked MT nucleation at boutons. Remarkably, we found that γ-tubulin knockdown strongly inhibited activity-evoked motility of SVs towards and away from the boutons (Figure 3EJ) with no preference in either anterograde or retrograde direction (Figure S3G,H and L). This demonstrates that activity-evoked MT nucleation at boutons is required for stimulated SV targeted interbouton delivery.

Inhibition of Arl8-mediated transport of SVs and presynaptic lysosome related vesicles (PLVs) affects bouton size and neurotransmission during bouton biogenesis [30, 31]. Thus, we examined whether dynamic MTs nucleated at boutons could affect SV pool size and/or exocytosis kinetics at presynaptic release sites of neurons with mature synapses. To this end, the pH sensitive vesicular chimeric marker vGlut1-pHluorin and the cytosolic filler mCherry-C1 were co-transfected into neurons (16DIV) that had been depleted of γ-tubulin expression by two independent shRNAs to levels that would only affect evoked-MT nucleation at boutons (4d of silencing). We measured no significant difference in vGlut1-pHluorin signal intensity at active presynapses after alkalinization with NH4Cl. However, a marked reduction of high frequency (10Hz) stimulated fluorescence in γ-tubulin deprived neurons was observed compared to control neurons, indicating that loss of AP-evoked MT nucleation at boutons strongly inhibited activity-stimulated exocytosis without altering the total pool of SVs residing at boutons (Figure 4AE). A more dramatic inhibition of stimulated fluorescence and a trend towards a decrease in the size of the total SV pool were observed in neurons depleted of γ-tubulin expression for 6d (Figure S4DH). This also resulted in a significant reduction in the % of total moving SVs in naïve neurons in contrast to loss of augmin expression, which did not detectably affect SV motility in either direction (Figure S4AC).

Figure 4. MT nucleation at boutons controls SV exocytosis.

Figure 4.

(A). Representative images of hippocampal neurons (16DIV) infected with noncoding control (shNC) or two independent shRNAs against γ-tubulin (shγ-tub #1 or #2) for 4d and co-transfected with vGlut1-pHluorin and mCherry-C1 prior to recording vGlut1-pHluorin dequenching for the indicated times in response to neuronal activation induced by 300 action potentials (AP) at 10Hz starting from 30s (Figure S4). (B) Normalized fluorescence change (ΔF) over total vGlut1-pHluorin (ΔF upon NH4Cl dequenching) at the indicated times. (C) Integrated intensity of vGlut1-pHluorin signal during the 300AP stimulation paradigm. (D) Total pool of SVs indicated by vGlut1-pHluorin signal intensity at active presynapses after alkalinization with NH4Cl. (E) Recycling pool of SVs indicated by the ratio of ΔF at maximum stimulation over ΔF after alkalinization with NH4Cl. (F) Representative images of hippocampal neurons (16DIV) infected shNC or shγ-tub #2 lentiviruses for 4d and co-transfected with GCaMP7s and vGlut1-mCherry using the same stimulation protocol as in A. (G) Ratio of GCaMP fluorescence change (ΔF) over baseline intensity (F0) at the indicated times. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001 by Mann-Whitney tests (A-E: N = 4–6 imaging fields including 8–18 axons with 200–360 boutons; F,G: N = 3–4 imaging fields including 6–12 axons with 120–150 boutons). Red asterisk in G compares γ-tubulin #2 to control levels at 40s.

Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels plays a crucial role in exocytosis, and the strong inhibition of AP-triggered exocytosis upon γ-tubulin depletion could potentially be due to decreased Ca2+ entry. We examined the impact of loss of γ-tubulin expression on AP-evoked Ca2+ entry [32], and although in our assays we could not differentiate between calcium influx from the external environment or calcium efflux from internal stores, we found that depleting γ-tubulin expression for 4d (Figure 4F,G) or 6d (Figure S4I and J) did not reduce AP-evoked Ca2+ accumulation at boutons, ruling out suppression of an increase in intracellular Ca2+ at boutons as a mechanism of the observed inhibition of presynaptic release.

Together, these data indicate that activity-stimulated de novo MT nucleation at boutons controls SV interbouton transport and neurotransmitter release.

DISCUSSION

We found that in primary hippocampal neurons, excitatory en passant boutons are hotspots for γ-tubulin dependent MT nucleation that is induced by neuronal activity. Importantly, MT nucleation preferentially occurs at excitatory boutons in hippocampal slices from neonatal mice, demonstrating that localized MT nucleation at boutons is a bona fide feature of mature hippocampal neurons residing in tissue where cytoarchitecture and synaptic organization are preserved (Figure 1).

γ-tubulin had been shown to control acentrosomal MT nucleation, neuronal polarity and axonal outgrowth in developing dendrites and axons [25, 33]. The present study reports a nucleating function of γ-tubulin in mature synapses that is compartmentalized, regulated by neuronal activity and rate-limiting for synaptic transmission.

In axons, we found that acute γ-tubulin knockdown preferentially affected MT initiation from the boutons, suggesting that MT initiation at boutons results from localized γ-tubulin nucleating activity (Figure 2 and Figure S2). Although we cannot formally rule out an unknown γ-tubulin MT rescue function at boutons or an effect of incomplete γ-tubulin depletion at interboutons, our data indicate that it is the MT nucleating activity of γ-tubulin to be required for MT initiation at boutons in response to neuronal activity and that interbouton comet density may be regulated by either MT rescue factors or a yet unknown non-γ-tubulin dependent MT nucleating machinery such as the recently discovered MT remodeling factor SSNA1 [34]. In support of our interpretation we further demonstrate that the correct polarity of presynaptic de novo nucleated MTs requires the augmin complex and that similarly to γ-tubulin, augmin+ puncta are preferentially localized at en passant presynaptic boutons compared to a cytosolic protein (Figure 2). Augmin complex depletion, however, had no impact on MT polarity in dendrites as antiparallel MT organization could be regulated by other mechanisms [2, 24]. It was previously shown that in axons of developing neurons γ-tubulin is required for acentrosomal MT organization and the augmin complex interacts with γTuRC to control conserved polarity [24, 25]. Our results not only demonstrate that the augmin complex restricts the uniform orientation of dynamic MTs at presynaptic boutons of mature axons but further support the notion that these newly generated presynaptic MTs result from de novo γ-tubulin nucleation rather than MT rescue or SSNA1-mediated protofilament splitting. How mature axons and selected boutons preferentially activate the augmin complex in coordination with γ-tubulin for the initiation of oriented MT nucleation upon neuronal firing remains to be established.

We found that at basal levels both endogenous and overexpressed γ-tubulin+ puncta and the HAUS7 subunit of the augmin complex are localized at en passant presynaptic boutons 2.5- (γ-tubulin) or 3- (HAUS7) fold more frequently compared to the cytosolic marker GAPDH (Figure 2). The basis for this selective localization is at moment unknown but may reflect modulation of SV releasing activity at individual synapses, and/or the ability of a bouton to establish functional contacts with a postsynaptic site. Future investigation is needed to detail the mechanisms of γ-tubulin and augmin recruitment to presynaptic boutons and the rules establishing bouton selection.

We observed that activity-dependent MT nucleation at boutons controls interbouton SV motility and neurotransmitter release (Figures 3 and 4). Arl8b facilitates the Kif1A-mediated motility of both SVs and PLVs, which coordinate the anterograde transport of packets of AZ and SV proteins in developing neurons during presynaptic biogenesis [30, 31, 35]. In addition, Kif1A was recently implicated in synaptic cargo anterograde delivery to en passant boutons using dynamic MTs as tracks [23]. Based on this collective evidence, we propose a model in which dynamic MTs are de novo nucleated to serve as tracks for targeted bidirectional interbouton delivery of a rate-limiting supply of SVs at sites of stimulated release. Whether these SVs represent a unique pool destined to interbouton delivery to provide for efficient exocytosis or two different pools with distinct rate-limiting components depending on the direction of delivery (distal versus proximal) remains to be established. Indeed, our observation that neuronal activity stimulates presynaptic de novo nucleation of dynamic MTs that terminate at the next distal bouton is in line with the findings that en passant boutons are enriched in dynamic MT plus ends [23]. Our results differ in that we observed that: (1) only MT nucleation (initiation) but not catastrophe/pausing (termination) is preferentially regulated at boutons at basal levels, (2) both anterograde and retrograde SV transport are equally dependent on MT nucleation at boutons (Figure 3 and S3). The discrepancy may perhaps be explained because, in contrast to their measurements which spanned along the entire length of the axon, our in vitro and ex vivo comet tracking was restricted to proximal axons, a region where interbouton bidirectional transport of pools of SVs predominates [23, 3639]. The model that Guedes-Dias et al. propose may be more consistent with targeted long-distance delivery and retention of SV precursors to synapses residing in the most distal region of the axon. At proximal synaptic sites, however, a higher proportion of bidirectional interbouton delivery of SVs may be required in response to neuronal activation. This is consistent with our observation that in proximal axons ~40% of nucleated comets at a bouton reach to the next bouton after bicuculline-induced firing compared to ~10% before stimulation in dissociated hippocampal neurons (Figure S1) or ~25% in hippocampal slices.

We found that loss of de novo nucleated MTs by γ-tubulin depletion significantly impairs high-frequency evoked-neurotransmitter release, paving the way for the characterization of the mechanisms by which presynaptic dynamic MTs may accomplish this task through targeted delivery of a rate-limiting pool of SVs to the sites of fusion and/or by mediating the transport of a rate-limiting vesicular component of the fusion or AZ machinery.

At present, the signaling pathways that regulate presynaptic MT nucleation are unknown. One hypothesis is that neuronal firing may drive Ca2+ influx-dependent activation of MT nucleation complexes at boutons. Given the critical role that loss of a functional presynaptic machinery for MT nucleation may have for neurotransmission, it will be important to determine the in vivo significance of this selective MT nucleation and whether dysregulation of this process can be associated with human neurological and neuropsychiatric illnesses caused by mutations in MT regulatory proteins residing presynaptically, such as tau in AD [40, 41] and tauopathies, spastin in hereditary spastic paraplegias [42, 43], and MAP1B and FMRP in Fragile X Syndrome [4446].

STAR Methods

LEAD CONTACT AND MATERIALS AVAILABILITY

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Francesca Bartolini (fb2131@columbia.edu). Plasmids generated in this paper will be available upon request.

EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS

All protocols and procedures for rats and mice were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Columbia University and according to Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Time-pregnant Sprague Dawley rats (Embryonic Day 18) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories for primary hippocampal neuronal cultures. Timed-pregnant female mice were obtained by mating C57BL/6J mice from Charles River Laboratories in house. At the time of in utero electroporation (Embryonic Day 15.5), littermates were randomly assigned to experimental groups without regard to their sex. Electroporated mice were born and group housed with the mother until weaning under standard laboratory conditions with food and water ad libitum and maintained in a 12h light/dark cycle. Mice were sacrificed at 21–28 days old for acute hippocampal slices.

Primary hippocampal neuronal cultures

Primary hippocampal neuronal cultures were prepared as previously described [47]. Briefly, hippocampi were dissected from E18 rat, and neurons plated on 100 μg/mL poly-D-lysine-coated 12-well-plates at the density of 3×105 cells/well for biochemistry assays, 5×104 cells/dish for live imaging in the chamber of 35mm MatTek dishes, or 4×104 cells/coverslip on18 mm coverslips for immunofluorescence. Primary neurons were maintained in Neurobasal medium (Invitrogen) with the supplement of 2% B-27 (Invitrogen) and 0.5mM glutamine (Invitrogen) at 37 °C, and 1/3 of the medium was changed every 3–4d up to 3w in culture.

Acute hippocampal slices

Acute hippocampal slices (200μm) were prepared from 21–28 days old electroporated mice using a vibratome (Leica Biosystem VT 1000S) and collected in complete HBSS media (HBSS, 30mM glucose, 1mM CaCl2, 1mM MgSO4, 4mM NaHCO3, and 2.5mM HEPES, pH 7.4). Acute slices were immediately transferred in 35mm MatTek dishes for live imaging.

METHOD DETAILS

Lentiviral shRNA silencing

Production of lentiviral particles was conducted using the 2nd generation packaging system as previously described [47]. Briefly, HEK293T were co-transfected with lentiviral shRNA constructs and the packaging vectors pLP1, pLP2, and pLP-VSV-G (Invitrogen) using calcium phosphate. 48h and 72h after transfection, the virus was collected, filtered through 0.22μm filter, and further concentrated by ultracentrifugation. Concentrated virus was aliquoted and stored at −80 °C.

Lentiviral constructs to knockdown γ-tubulin were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (TRCN0000089905 and TRCN0000089907) with the following DNA sequence 5’-CCGGGCAATCAGATTGGGTTCGAGTCTCGAGACTCGAACCCAATCTGATTGCTTTTTG-3’ and 5’-CCGGGCAGCAGCTGATTGACGAGTACTCGAGTACTCGTCAATCAGCTGCTGCTTTTTG-3’ onto pLKO.1 lentivector. Lentiviral constructs to knockdown HAUS1 and HAUS7 were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (TRCN0000192324 and TRCN0000345686) with the following DNA sequence 5’-CCGGCTTTCTCATGGAGAGTGTGAACTCGAGTTCACACTCTCCATGAGAAAGTTTTTTG-3’ and 5’-CCGGCCAGATGACCAGGATCTTCTACTCGAGTAGAAGATCCTGGTCATCTGGTTTTTG-3’ onto pLKO.1 lentivector. The pLKO.1 vector with noncoding (NC) sequence was used as control.

Western blot analyses

Cells were lysed in Laemmli sample buffer and boiled at 96°C for 5m. Cell lysates were sonicated by a probe sonicator to sheer cellular debris and genomic DNA. To detect tubulins, lysates were diluted 1:10 in sample buffer. Proteins were separated by 10% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking in 5% milk/TBS or BSA/TBS, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight prior to 1h incubation with secondary antibodies. Image acquisition was performed with an Odyssey imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, NE) and analyzed with Odyssey software.

Immunofluorescence microscopy and analyses

For MT staining, neurons were fixed in 3.7% PFA, 0.25% glutaraldehyde, 3.7% sucrose and 0.1% triton-X 100 for 15 min and quenched in 1 mg/mL sodium borohydride/PBS. For γ-tubulin, HAUS7, GAPDH and synapsin staining, neurons were fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min. Cells were then washed in PBS, blocked in 2% FBS, 2% BSA, and 0.2% fish gelatin in PBS for 1 h, and stained with primary antibodies for 2h followed by secondary antibodies for 1h. Mounted samples were observed by a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope equipped with Airyscan module, using a 63x objective (Plan-Apochromat, NA 1.4). Images were obtained and processed for super resolution using Zen Blue 2.1 software. All images were analyzed by ImageJ software except for pseudocolor presentation of vGlut-pHluorin experiments that were instead obtained using Metamorph software.

Live imaging of MT, organelle and SV dynamics

Neurons grown on MatTek dishes were co-transfected with EB3-EGFP or EB3-tdTomato using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), together with presynaptic markers vGlut1-mCherry, vGlut1-Venus, vGlut1-mTagBFP2, or VAMP2-mCherry. For organelle dynamics, triple transfection of EB3, vGlut1, together with the organelle markers Rab5-EGFP, EGFP-Rab7a, LAMP1-GFP, or mitoDsRed were performed using Lipofectamine 2000. Live cell imaging was performed 24–48h after transfection in complete HBSS media (HBSS, 30mM glucose, 1mM CaCl2, 1mM MgSO4, 4mM NaHCO3, and 2.5mM HEPES, pH 7.4) using IX83 Andor Revolution XD Spinning Disk Confocal System. The microscope was equipped with a 100×/1.49 oil UApo objective, a multi-axis stage controller (ASI MS-2000), and a controlled temperature and CO2 incubator. Movies were acquired with an Andor iXon Ultra EMCCD camera and Andor iQ 3.6.2 live cell imaging software at 0.5–2 s/frame for 3min. For pharmacological induction of neuronal activity, neurons were pretreated with 50μM D-AP5 for 6–12h prior to live imaging in complete neurobasal media, then changed to complete HBSS media with the same concentration of D-AP5 for live imaging. To induce neuronal activity, neurons were washed 3x with complete HBSS media and 20μM bicuculline or DMSO control was added to complete HBSS media after washes. For BDNF induction of neuronal activity, 50ng/ml BDNF was directly added to complete HBSS media during live imaging. Movies were taken 1min upon treatment. Maximum projections of movies were performed by Image Math within Andor software, exported as Tiff files and analyzed in ImageJ. Kymographs were generated by drawing a region from the proximal to the distal axons (within 100μm from the cell body) based on morphology and anterograde movement of EB3-labeled comets. Presynaptic MTs were classified based on their plus end contacts with stable vGlut1 or VAMP2 labeled boutons. In our measurements of EB3 tracks starting or ending at boutons, we also included those that start or end at a bouton and pass through the next distal or proximal boutons. Parameters describing MT dynamics were defined as follows: rescue/nucleation frequency: number of rescue or nucleation events per μm2 per min; catastrophe frequency: number of full tracks/total duration of growth; comet density: number of comets per μm2 per min; growth length: comet movement length in μm; comet lifetime: duration of growth; growth rate: growth length/comet lifetime [48]. Parameters describing organelle and SV dynamics were defined as follows: % of moving puncta: number of moving puncta/number of total puncta × 100; % of tracks start/end at boutons: number of tracks start or end at boutons/number of total moving tracks × 100; % of retrograde tracks: number of retrograde tracks/number of total moving tracks × 100.

In utero electroporation and live-imaging of acute hippocampal slices

A mix of endotoxin-free plasmid EB3-EGFP (1.5mg/mL) and vGlut-mcherry (1.2mg/mL) and 0.5% Fast Green (Sigma) was injected into one lateral hemisphere of E15.5 embryos using a Picospritzer III (Parker). Electroporation (ECM 830, BTX) was performed with 5mm electrode tweezers (Nepagene, Japan) to target hippocampal progenitors in E15.5 embryos using a triple electrode setup according to dal Maschio et al. [49]. Five pulses of 45V for 50ms with 500ms interval were used for electroporation. Animals were sacrificed 21–28 days after birth. Acute hippocampal slices were prepared as in experimental model and subject details section. Electroporated hippocampal neurons from CA1 region were selected and imaged using an inverted Nikon Ti-E microscope with Nikon Elements Software at 37°C. 488 and 561nm lasers were used as light source and shuttered by Acousto-Optic Tunable Filters (AOTF). Live-imaging acquisition of EB3 comets relative to vGlut1 positive stable puncta within 50–100 μm of cell bodies was performed for 300s using a 60x oil-immersion objective (NA1.4) at 3 s/frame.

Live imaging of SV exo-/endocytosis

To test synaptic exo-endocytosis via the vGlut-pHluorin assay using electrical field stimulation, hippocampal neurons were infected with noncoding shNC control or two independent shRNAs against γ-tubulin (shγ-tub #1 or #2) lentiviruses at 12DIV and co-transfected with vGlut-pHluorin and mCherry at 13DIV. Imaging of live neurons was performed at 16DIV in Tyrode’s buffer containing 119mM NaCl, 2.5mM KCl, 2mM MgCl2, 2mM CaCl2, 25mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 30mM D-glucose, 10μM 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX; Tocris), and 50μM D-(−)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic (D-AP5 or APV; Tocris) buffered to pH 7.4 at 37°C. Images were acquired with a 40X objective (Neofluar, NA 1.3) on an epifluorescence microscope (Axio Observer Z1, Zeiss) with Colibri LED light source, EMCCD camera (Hamamatsu) and Zeiss Zen software. Stills of the mCherry and pHluorin channels were acquired followed by a 300s time lapse of the pHluorin channel recorded at 5s/frame. Action potentials (AP) were evoked by passing 1msec bipolar current through platinum-iridium electrodes connected to metal tubes containing imaging buffer at 10Hz using a digital stimulator (World Precision Instruments) and a stimulator isolator (World Precision Instruments). Tyrode’s buffer supplemented with 50mM NH4Cl was perfused at the end of the recording to assess maximum pHluorin signal.

Live imaging of Ca2+ influx by GCaMP7s

Primary hippocampal neurons (16DIV) were infected with noncoding shNC control or two independent shRNAs against γ-tubulin (shγ-tub #1 or #2) lentiviruses at 12DIV and co-transfected with GCaMP7s and vGlut1-mCherry at 13DIV. Live imaging was performed at 16DIV using the same microscopy setup and protocol as SV exo-/endocytosis without NH4Cl dequenching at the end of each recording.

QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data are shown as means ± SEMs from at least 3 independent experiments and figures are generated by GraphPad Prism. Image analysis was performed by ImageJ (Fiji), MetaMorph Image Analysis Software, Zeiss Zen, and Andor iQ3. Western blot analysis was performed by LI-COR Image Studio Software. Statistical analysis between two groups was performed using Student’s t tests (N> 15), Mann-Whitney tests (unpaired samples N< 15 in Figure S1A,B; Figure 2C; Figure S2B,D,G and J; Figure 3 comparing untreated and AP5 washout with bicuculline; Figure S3 comparing untreated and AP5 washout with bicuculline; Figure 4; Figure S4DJ), or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test (paired samples N< 15 in Figure 1B,C,F,H,J; Figure S1D,E,F and H; Figure 2H; Figure 3 comparing before and after AP5 washout with bicuculline or before and after BDNF treatment; Figure S3 comparing before and after AP5 washout with bicuculline). Comparison among 3 or more groups was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test for non-parametric unpaired one way ANOVA (unpaired samples N< 15 in Figure 2D,F,G,J and K; Figure S2H and L; Figure S4AC). Statistical significance was set for p<0.05.

DATA AND CODE AVAILABILITY

The published article includes all data generated or analyzed during this study.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3

Video S1. EB3-EGFP comets initiate at en passant boutons in acute hippocampal slices, related to Figure 1. Maximum intensity projection of a time-lapse showing EB3-EGFP comet motility relative to stable vGlut1-mCherry labeled boutons from an axon residing in the CA1 hippocampal region of an acute slice.

Download video file (312.6KB, avi)
4

Video S2. EB3-EGFP comets are induced at presynaptic boutons by bicucullinestimulated neuronal activity, related to Figure 1. Maximum intensity projection of a time-lapse showing EB3-EGFP comet motility relative to stable vGlut1-mCherry labeled boutons from an axon of a cultured hippocampal neuron pretreated with 50μM AP5 followed by a washout and incubation with 20μM bicuculline.

Download video file (299.4KB, avi)
5

Video S3. EB3-EGFP comets are induced at presynaptic boutons by BDNF, related to Figure 1. Maximum intensity projection of a time-lapse showing EB3-EGFP comet motility relative to stable vGlut1-mCherry labeled boutons from an axon of a cultured hippocampal neuron treated with 50ng/ml BDNF.

Download video file (552.8KB, avi)
6

Video S4. HAUS7 depletion induces retrograde EB3-EGFP comets at presynaptic boutons, related to Figure 2. Maximum intensity projection of a time-lapse showing EB3-EGFP comet motility relative to stable vGlut1-mCherry labeled boutons from axons of cultured hippocampal neurons infected with shNC control or shHAUS7 lentiviruses for 7d.

Download video file (1.6MB, avi)

Highlights.

  • Excitatory boutons are hotspots for activity-induced MT nucleation

  • Presynaptic de novo MT nucleation depends on γ-tubulin and the augmin complex

  • The augmin complex is required for correct polarity of presynaptic nucleated MTs

  • Presynaptic MT nucleation promotes SV motility and exocytosis at sites of release

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Our gratitude goes to Franck Polleux for providing us with the ex vivo experimental set up, EB3-EGFP, mito-DsRed2, synaptophysin-Venus, and vGlut1-mTagBFP2 constructs in addition to helpful discussions; Viktoriya Zhuravleva for assisting us with the vGlut1-pHluorin experimental set up; Inbal Israely for sharing pCMV-GCaMP7s construct; Richard Vallee for sharing EGFP-Rab7a construct; Volker Haucke for sharing LAMP1-EGFP and ARl8b-EGFP constructs; Ryan Bose-Roy for helping with the analysis of the movies. We are grateful to Gregg G. Gundersen and Richard Vallee for access to their microscopes. This project was funded by an RO1AG050658 (NIH/NIA) to F.B.

Footnotes

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Dent EW (2017). Of microtubules and memory: implications for microtubule dynamics in dendrites and spines. Mol Biol Cell 28, 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kapitein LC, and Hoogenraad CC (2015). Building the Neuronal Microtubule Cytoskeleton. Neuron 87, 492–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nirschl JJ, Ghiretti AE, and Holzbaur ELF (2017). The impact of cytoskeletal organization on the local regulation of neuronal transport. Nat Rev Neurosci 18, 585–597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gu J, Firestein BL, and Zheng JQ (2008). Microtubules in dendritic spine development. J Neurosci 28, 12120–12124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hu X, Viesselmann C, Nam S, Merriam E, and Dent EW (2008). Activity-dependent dynamic microtubule invasion of dendritic spines. J Neurosci 28, 13094–13105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jaworski J, Kapitein LC, Gouveia SM, Dortland BR, Wulf PS, Grigoriev I, Camera P, Spangler SA, Di Stefano P, Demmers J, et al. (2009). Dynamic microtubules regulate dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity. Neuron 61, 85–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kapitein LC, Yau KW, Gouveia SM, van der Zwan WA, Wulf PS, Keijzer N, Demmers J, Jaworski J, Akhmanova A, and Hoogenraad CC (2011). NMDA receptor activation suppresses microtubule growth and spine entry. J Neurosci 31, 8194–8209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McVicker DP, Awe AM, Richters KE, Wilson RL, Cowdrey DA, Hu X, Chapman ER, and Dent EW (2016). Transport of a kinesin-cargo pair along microtubules into dendritic spines undergoing synaptic plasticity. Nat Commun 7, 12741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Merriam EB, Millette M, Lumbard DC, Saengsawang W, Fothergill T, Hu X, Ferhat L, and Dent EW (2013). Synaptic regulation of microtubule dynamics in dendritic spines by calcium, F-actin, and drebrin. J Neurosci 33, 16471–16482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gray EG (1959). Axo-somatic and axo-dendritic synapses of the cerebral cortex: an electron microscope study. J Anat 93, 420–433. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gray EG (1975). Presynaptic microtubules and their association with synaptic vesicles. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 190, 367–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gray EG (1976). Problems of understanding the substructure of synapses. Prog Brain Res 45, 207–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gray EG (1978). Synaptic vesicles and microtubules in frog motor endplates. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 203, 219–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gray EG, Burgoyne RD, Westrum LE, Cumming R, and Barron J (1982). The enigma of microtubule coils in brain synaptosomes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 216, 385–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gray EG, Westrum LE, Burgoyne RD, and Barron J (1982). Synaptic organisation and neuron microtubule distribution. Cell Tissue Res 226, 579–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Westrum LE, and Gray EG (1977). Microtubules associated with postsynaptic ‘thickenings’. J Neurocytol 6, 505–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Westrum LE, Gray EG, Burgoyne RD, and Barron J (1983). Synaptic development and microtubule organization. Cell Tissue Res 231, 93–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Graffe M, Zenisek D, and Taraska JW (2015). A marginal band of microtubules transports and organizes mitochondria in retinal bipolar synaptic terminals. J Gen Physiol 146, 109–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pawson C, Eaton BA, and Davis GW (2008). Formin-Dependent Synaptic Growth: Evidence That Dlar Signals via Diaphanous to Modulate Synaptic Actin and Dynamic Pioneer Microtubules. Journal of Neuroscience 28, 11111–11123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Roos J, Hummel T, Ng N, Klambt C, and Davis GW (2000). Drosophila Futsch regulates synaptic microtubule organization and is necessary for synaptic growth. Neuron 26, 371–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Migh E, Gotz T, Foldi I, Szikora S, Gombos R, Darula Z, Medzihradszky KF, Maleth J, Hegyi P, Sigrist S, et al. (2018). Microtubule organization in presynaptic boutons relies on the formin DAAM. Development 145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guillaud L, Dimitrov D, and Takahashi T (2017). Presynaptic morphology and vesicular composition determine vesicle dynamics in mouse central synapses. Elife 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guedes-Dias P, Nirschl JJ, Abreu N, Tokito MK, Janke C, Magiera MM, and Holzbaur ELF (2019). Kinesin-3 Responds to Local Microtubule Dynamics to Target Synaptic Cargo Delivery to the Presynapse. Curr Biol 29, 268–282 e268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cunha-Ferreira I, Chazeau A, Buijs RR, Stucchi R, Will L, Pan X, Adolfs Y, van der Meer C, Wolthuis JC, Kahn OI, et al. (2018). The HAUS Complex Is a Key Regulator of Non-centrosomal Microtubule Organization during Neuronal Development. Cell Rep 24, 791–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sanchez-Huertas C, Freixo F, Viais R, Lacasa C, Soriano E, and Luders J (2016). Non-centrosomal nucleation mediated by augmin organizes microtubules in post-mitotic neurons and controls axonal microtubule polarity. Nat Commun 7, 12187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moughamian AJ, Osborn GE, Lazarus JE, Maday S, and Holzbaur EL (2013). Ordered recruitment of dynactin to the microtubule plus-end is required for efficient initiation of retrograde axonal transport. J Neurosci 33, 13190–13203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nirschl JJ, Magiera MM, Lazarus JE, Janke C, and Holzbaur EL (2016). alpha-Tubulin Tyrosination and CLIP-170 Phosphorylation Regulate the Initiation of Dynein-Driven Transport in Neurons. Cell Rep 14, 2637–2652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Okada Y, Yamazaki H, Sekine-Aizawa Y, and Hirokawa N (1995). The neuron-specific kinesin superfamily protein KIF1A is a unique monomeric motor for anterograde axonal transport of synaptic vesicle precursors. Cell 81, 769–780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamazaki H, Nakata T, Okada Y, and Hirokawa N (1995). KIF3A/B: a heterodimeric kinesin superfamily protein that works as a microtubule plus end-directed motor for membrane organelle transport. J Cell Biol 130, 1387–1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Klassen MP, Wu YE, Maeder CI, Nakae I, Cueva JG, Lehrman EK, Tada M, Gengyo-Ando K, Wang GJ, Goodman M, et al. (2010). An Arf-like small G protein, ARL-8, promotes the axonal transport of presynaptic cargoes by suppressing vesicle aggregation. Neuron 66, 710–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vukoja A, Rey U, Petzoldt AG, Ott C, Vollweiter D, Quentin C, Puchkov D, Reynolds E, Lehmann M, Hohensee S, et al. (2018). Presynaptic Biogenesis Requires Axonal Transport of Lysosome-Related Vesicles. Neuron 99, 1216–1232 e1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dana H, Sun Y, Mohar B, Hulse BK, Kerlin AM, Hasseman JP, Tsegaye G, Tsang A, Wong A, Patel R, et al. (2019). High-performance calcium sensors for imaging activity in neuronal populations and microcompartments. Nat Methods 16, 649–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nguyen MM, McCracken CJ, Milner ES, Goetschius DJ, Weiner AT, Long MK, Michael NL, Munro S, and Rolls MM (2014). Gamma-tubulin controls neuronal microtubule polarity independently of Golgi outposts. Mol Biol Cell 25, 2039–2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Basnet N, Nedozralova H, Crevenna AH, Bodakuntla S, Schlichthaerle T, Taschner M, Cardone G, Janke C, Jungmann R, Magiera MM, et al. (2018). Direct induction of microtubule branching by microtubule nucleation factor SSNA1. Nat Cell Biol 20, 1172–1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Maeder CI, San-Miguel A, Wu EY, Lu H, and Shen K (2014). In vivo neuron-wide analysis of synaptic vesicle precursor trafficking. Traffic 15, 273–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Darcy KJ, Staras K, Collinson LM, and Goda Y (2006). Constitutive sharing of recycling synaptic vesicles between presynaptic boutons. Nat Neurosci 9, 315–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fernandez-Alfonso T, and Ryan TA (2008). A heterogeneous “resting” pool of synaptic vesicles that is dynamically interchanged across boutons in mammalian CNS synapses. Brain Cell Biol 36, 87–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rizzoli SO (2014). Synaptic vesicle recycling: steps and principles. EMBO J 33, 788–822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Staras K, Branco T, Burden JJ, Pozo K, Darcy K, Marra V, Ratnayaka A, and Goda Y (2010). A vesicle superpool spans multiple presynaptic terminals in hippocampal neurons. Neuron 66, 37–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.McInnes J, Wierda K, Snellinx A, Bounti L, Wang YC, Stancu IC, Apostolo N, Gevaert K, Dewachter I, Spires-Jones TL, et al. (2018). Synaptogyrin-3 Mediates Presynaptic Dysfunction Induced by Tau. Neuron 97, 823–835 e828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhou L, McInnes J, Wierda K, Holt M, Herrmann AG, Jackson RJ, Wang YC, Swerts J, Beyens J, Miskiewicz K, et al. (2017). Tau association with synaptic vesicles causes presynaptic dysfunction. Nat Commun 8, 15295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sherwood NT, Sun Q, Xue M, Zhang B, and Zinn K (2004). Drosophila spastin regulates synaptic microtubule networks and is required for normal motor function. PLoS Biol 2, e429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Trotta N, Orso G, Rossetto MG, Daga A, and Broadie K (2004). The hereditary spastic paraplegia gene, spastin, regulates microtubule stability to modulate synaptic structure and function. Curr Biol 14, 1135–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bodaleo FJ, and Gonzalez-Billault C (2016). The Presynaptic Microtubule Cytoskeleton in Physiological and Pathological Conditions: Lessons from Drosophila Fragile X Syndrome and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias. Front Mol Neurosci 9, 60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lu R, Wang H, Liang Z, Ku L, O’Donnell W T, Li W, Warren ST, and Feng Y (2004). The fragile X protein controls microtubule-associated protein 1B translation and microtubule stability in brain neuron development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 15201–15206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang YQ, Bailey AM, Matthies HJ, Renden RB, Smith MA, Speese SD, Rubin GM, and Broadie K (2001). Drosophila fragile X-related gene regulates the MAP1B homolog Futsch to control synaptic structure and function. Cell 107, 591–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu J, Pasini S, Shelanski ML, and Greene LA (2014). Activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) modulates post-synaptic development and dendritic spine morphology. Front Cell Neurosci 8, 177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stepanova T, Smal I, van Haren J, Akinci U, Liu Z, Miedema M, Limpens R, van Ham M, van der Reijden M, Poot R, et al. (2010). History-dependent catastrophes regulate axonal microtubule behavior. Curr Biol 20, 1023–1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.dal Maschio M, Ghezzi D, Bony G, Alabastri A, Deidda G, Brondi M, Sato SS, Zaccaria RP, Di Fabrizio E, Ratto GM, et al. (2012). High-performance and site-directed in utero electroporation by a triple-electrode probe. Nat Commun 3, 960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3

Video S1. EB3-EGFP comets initiate at en passant boutons in acute hippocampal slices, related to Figure 1. Maximum intensity projection of a time-lapse showing EB3-EGFP comet motility relative to stable vGlut1-mCherry labeled boutons from an axon residing in the CA1 hippocampal region of an acute slice.

Download video file (312.6KB, avi)
4

Video S2. EB3-EGFP comets are induced at presynaptic boutons by bicucullinestimulated neuronal activity, related to Figure 1. Maximum intensity projection of a time-lapse showing EB3-EGFP comet motility relative to stable vGlut1-mCherry labeled boutons from an axon of a cultured hippocampal neuron pretreated with 50μM AP5 followed by a washout and incubation with 20μM bicuculline.

Download video file (299.4KB, avi)
5

Video S3. EB3-EGFP comets are induced at presynaptic boutons by BDNF, related to Figure 1. Maximum intensity projection of a time-lapse showing EB3-EGFP comet motility relative to stable vGlut1-mCherry labeled boutons from an axon of a cultured hippocampal neuron treated with 50ng/ml BDNF.

Download video file (552.8KB, avi)
6

Video S4. HAUS7 depletion induces retrograde EB3-EGFP comets at presynaptic boutons, related to Figure 2. Maximum intensity projection of a time-lapse showing EB3-EGFP comet motility relative to stable vGlut1-mCherry labeled boutons from axons of cultured hippocampal neurons infected with shNC control or shHAUS7 lentiviruses for 7d.

Download video file (1.6MB, avi)

Data Availability Statement

The published article includes all data generated or analyzed during this study.

RESOURCES