Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Jul 20;109(1):132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.072

Galectin-3 as a Predictor of Long-term Survival after Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

Devin M Parker 1, Sherry L Owens 1, Niveditta Ramkumar 1, Donald Likosky 2,3, Anthony W DiScipio 4, David J Malenka 4, Todd A MacKenzie 1, Jeremiah R Brown 1,5,6
PMCID: PMC6917892  NIHMSID: NIHMS1535867  PMID: 31336070

Abstract

Background:

Galectin-3 is a well-established biomarker of adverse clinical outcomes but its prognostic value for long-term survival after cardiac surgery is not well understood. Elevated levels of Galectin-3 have been found to be significantly associated with higher risk of death in both acute decompensated and chronic heart failure populations. Its prognostic value for long-term survival after cardiac surgery is not known.

Methods:

A sample of patients contributing to the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group Cardiac Surgery Registry from 2004–2007 were enrolled in a prospective biomarker cohort (N = 1,690). Preoperative Galectin 3 levels were measured and categorized by quartile. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models adjusting for variables in the STS ASCERT probability calculator to evaluate the association between elevated Galectin-3 levels and survival to 6 years.

Results:

Preoperative Galectin-3 levels ranged from 1.72 to 28.89 ng/mL (mean=8.96; median=8.06; interquartile range=5.42, 11.08). Crude survival decreased by increasing quartile. After adjustment, serum levels of Galectin-3 in the highest quartile of the cohort were associated with significantly decreased survival compared to the lowest quartile (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.40 – 3.54, p = 0.001). There was no decrease in survival for the middle quartiles (HR: 1.36; 95%CI: 0.87 – 2.12; p = 0.177).

Conclusions:

There is a significant association between elevated preoperative Gal-3 levels and risk of mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. An assessment of the relationship between preoperative serum biomarkers and long-term survival can be used for risk stratification or estimating postsurgical prognosis.

Classifications: Cardiovascular surgery, mortality, prediction, biomarkers, Galectin-3


Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States1, 2. Over 253,000 people undergo cardiac surgery to treat coronary artery and valve disease costing over $8 billion annually1, 3. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery suffer from a particularly high-risk for mortality. Most prediction models for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery are limited to in-hospital or 30-day endpoints. We applied a well-established long-term survival model using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Collaboration on the Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategy (ASCERT) Long-Term Survival Probability risk calculator4.

Galectin-3 is a member of the lectin family involved in numerous physiological and pathological processes, including inflammation and fibrosis, which are pivotal pathophysiological mechanisms in the development and progression of HF.58 An increase of Gal-3 stimulates the release of various mediators and promotes cardiac fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition and ventricular dysfunction.9, 10 Furthermore, the involvement of Gal-3 in the development of fibrosis has also been demonstrated in the heart, liver and kidney.11, 12 Gal-3 was also found to be significantly up-regulated in hypertrophied hearts of patients with aortic stenosis and in the plasma of patients with acute and chronic HF.1316

These observations suggest that circulating Gal-3 is useful in identifying patients at risk for developing a poor postoperative prognosis, however little is known about the clinical utility of Gal-3 as it relates to CABG and long-term survival. Identifying CABG patients who may benefit from additional intervention or altered postoperative management is of interest to both cardiothoracic surgeons and hospitals. The use of novel biomarkers could aid in patient risk stratification and estimating postoperative prognosis. We hypothesize that elevated levels of Gal-3 are significantly associated with worse long-term outcomes and short long-term survival. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between pre-and postoperative Gal3 levels and long-term survival among patients undergoing isolated CABG.

Patient and Methods

NNE Biomarker Study

The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group (NNECDSG)17, is a longitudinal cohort initiated in 1987 to prospectively study the management of patients with cardiovascular disease. The NNECDSG is a voluntary, regional consortium of clinicians, research scientists, and hospital administrators from eight medical centers in New Hampshire, Maine and Vermont. All hospitals in this consortium submit data on cases with validation of procedure numbers and mortality conducted every two years. Registry data includes patient characteristics, procedural indication, clinical variables and in-hospital outcomes. All institutional review boards for each contributing hospital reviewed and approved the data collection for the NNECDSG as well as the conduct of this study.

We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing isolated CABG into the NNE Biomarker Study from 2004 to 2007 (N = 1,690). Patients were excluded from the analysis if they died during the index admission (n=40) or if their recorded date of discharge occurred after their recorded date last known alive (n=2). We removed patients with missing biomarker data (n=130), leaving 1,560 in our final analysis. The Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at Dartmouth College (IRB) approved this study for both the prospective cohort with patient consent and the linkage of readmission and mortality events.

Primary Outcomes: Long-term Survival

The cohort was linked to state all-payer inpatient claims using name, gender, social security number, date of birth and residence at the time of surgery. Maine and Vermont completed links internally. We used probabilistic linking for New Hampshire all-payer inpatient claims. We achieved complete ascertainment for Vermont and Maine; five percent of New Hampshire patients were not matched in the inpatient claims. The primary outcome of this study was long-term survival after cardiac surgery from the index admission. All patients enrolled in the biomarker study were linked to the National Death Index to determine all-cause mortality.

Biomarker collection and measurement

Blood samples were preoperatively collected prior to incision at each participating site in a 10-mL serum tube from 2003–2007. Blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for 20 minutes to separate out the red blood cells, the tubes were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 20 minutes, and the sera stored at the respective medical centers below −80 degree Celsius until transportation on dry ice to the Laboratory for Clinical and Biomedical Research in Colchester, Vermont where they were stored at −80 degree Celsius until measurement. Frozen serum was analyzed at a central laboratory, at the same time for biomarker measurement. Markers were measured by Roche Diagnostics Elecsys 2010. Adjusted Galectin-3 values were calculated to correct for a reagent shift in the assays.

Statistical Analysis

Patient, clinical and procedural characteristics were compared using chi-square tests and continuous data were compared between groups using the student’s t-test or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests, were appropriate. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank techniques were used to conduct a time-to-event analysis. We right-censored our analyses at 6-years due to the lack of events after 6 years. Patients were stratified by pre-and postoperative biomarker levels by quartile. We elected to treat the biomarker levels as categorical rather than continuous variables due to the graded relationship of quartile categories and mortality incidence. Following Kaplan-Meier analysis, quartiles 2 and 3 were found to have similar survival and were therefore combined into one category.

Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to assess the relationship of pre-and-postoperative biomarker levels and long-term survival, using biomarker quartile cut points. Adjustment was carried out using the American College of Cardiology Foundation STS ASCERT Long-Term Survival Probability Calculator.4 This model corrects for age, sex, body surface area, preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, preoperative myocardial infarction, prior CABG, prior percutaneous intervention, smoking status, atrial fibrillation, unstable angina, history of congestive heart failure, ejection fraction, left main stenosis > 50%, hypertension, diabetes, vascular disease, COPD, preoperative serum creatinine, and emergent and urgent priority status. All analyses were conducted using Stata 13.1 (College Station, TX).

Results

Patient characteristics

Overall, 241 (15.5%) patients died within 6-years of cardiac surgery. Patient preoperative and operative characteristics and comorbidities are described in Table 1. Mean age was 65 ± 10 years, 79% were male. Preoperative mean Gal-3 plasma levels were 8.9 ± 5.4 ng/mL (IQR: 5.42 – 11.1). Postoperative mean Gal-3 levels were 10.2 ±13.4 ng/mL (IQR: 5.7 – 12.0).

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients by survival status after CABG or valve replacement in NNE.

Characteristics Died (n=241) Survived (n=1,319) Std. Diff. (d) p-value
Age, mean years (SD) 69.9 (10.2) 64.5 (9.9) 0.54 <0.001
Women 30% 22% 0.20 0.002
Body Mass Index <0.001
 < 18.5 kg/m2 2.2% 0.4% 0.16
 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 18% 17% 0.04
 25.0–29.9 kg/m2 41% 40% 0.02
 30.0–34.9 kg/m2 24% 28% 0.09
 ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 15% 15% 0.01
Preoperative IABP 6.7% 4.2% 0.11 0.071
Preoperative MI <0.001
 No 48% 57% 0.20
 < 24 hours 1.1% 1.9% 0.06
 > 24 hours, < 7 days 22% 18% 0.09
 > 7 days, < 365 days 13% 9.1% 0.14
 > 365 days 16% 14% 0.07
Prior CABG 4.2% 2.1% 0.12 0.037
Prior PCI 3.4% 3.7% 0.02 0.820
Smoker 25% 23% 0.07 0.318
Atrial Fibrillation 16% 5.6% 0.34 <0.001
Unstable angina 57% 54% 0.06 0.335
Congestive heart failure 29% 7.8% 0.57 <0.001
Ejection Fraction (SD) 49.7 (13.3) 54.6 (11.5) 0.39 <0.001
Left main, ≥ 50% stenosis 40% 33% 0.15 0.020
Hypertension 84% 80% 0.09 0.184
Diabetes 50% 36% 0.29 <0.001
Vascular Disease 42% 25% 0.39 <0.001
COPD 22% 12% 0.28 <0.001
Preoperative serum creatinine, mg/dL (SD) 1.32 (0.82) 1.13 (1.05) 0.18 0.007
Priority <0.001
 Non-urgent 24% 32 % 0.17
 Urgent 75% 66% 0.18
 Emergent 1.5% 2.0% 0.04
Received PRBC 65% 34% 0.65 <0.001
PRBC, units (SD) 3.12 (4.49) 0.95 (1.73) 0.64 <0.001
AKIN Network Stage 0.021
 No AKI 43% 68% 0.52
 AKIN 1 39% 29% 0.22
 AKIN 2 7.6% 2.0% 0.27
 AKIN 3 10% 9.4% 0.42
Low cardiac output 15.8% 4.6% 0.24 <0.001

AKI=acute kidney injury, AKIN=Acute Kidney Injury Network, BMI=body mass index (kg/m2), BSA=body surface area (m2), CABG=coronary artery bypass graft, CHF=congestive heart failure, COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, IABP=intra-operative balloon pump, MI=myocardial infarction, PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention, pRBC=packed red blood count.

Within our cohort, we observed a significant association with patients who displayed classic cardiovascular risk factors and risk of long-term mortality. These patients were older on average, had prior CABG, had atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure (CHF), decreased ejection fraction, more likely to be diabetic, have vascular disease, COPD, and received more PRBC units.

Univariate Analyses

In the univariate analyses, pre-and postoperative Gal-3 were significantly associated with long-term mortality after CABG surgery for those in the highest quartile (HR: 3.73, 95% CI: 2.43 – 5.73, p=<0.001; HR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.95 – 3.72, p=<0.001, respectively) (Table 2). The postoperative lower quartile did not demonstrate a significant relationship with elevated Gal-3 and increased hazard of long-term mortality.

Table 2.

Simple and adjusted effects of preoperative and postoperative serum biomarker levels on long-term survival.

Biomarker % Dead Unadjusted Adjusted
HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI p-value
Preoperative
Quartile 1 8.5% 1.00 - - 1.00 (ref) - -
Quartile 2–3 12% (ref) 1.14 – 2.70 0.010 1.36 0.87 – 2.12 0.177
Quartile 4 27% 1.76 2.43 – 5.73 <0.001 2.22 1.40 – 3.54 0.001
3.73
Postoperative
Quartile 1 7.8% 1.00 - - 1.00 (ref) - -
Quartile 2–3 13% (ref) 0.70 – 1.39 0.936 0.84 0.59 – 1.19 0.328
Quartile 4 29% 0.98 1.95 – 3.72 <0.001 1.66 1.16 – 2.37 0.005
2.70

Adjusted for STS ASCERT

*

HR= hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards model; CI= confidence interval

We observed a significant relationship between elevated levels of pre-and postoperative Gal-3 and long-term mortality for patients with low cardiac output after surgery. For those with pre-and postoperative Gal-3 levels in the highest quartile, low cardiac output patients incurred a 2-fold increase of long-term mortality (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.08 – 3.43; OR: 2.36; 95% Ci: 1.19 – 4.65, respectively). Patient characteristics by Gal-3 quartile are presented in Supplementary Table 1.

Adjusted analyses

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed serum levels of Galectin-3 in the highest quartile of the population measured preoperatively and postoperatively conferred increased risk of mortality (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.40 – 3.54, p = 0.001; HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.16 – 2.37, p = 0.005, respectively) (Table 2). Pre- or postoperative serum levels of Galectin-3 in quartile 2/3 were not significantly associated with long-term survival. Full adjusted Cox proportional hazard model analyses by preoperative and postoperative Gal-3 tercile are presented in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3.

Survival analyses

The median follow-up time was 8 years (IQR: 7.5 – 9.7) and the 6-year survival rate was 86%. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significant (p<0.001) difference across quartiles of pre- and postoperative biomarker levels (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1. Adjusted Kaplan Meier curves for survival by quartile categories of preoperative Galectin-3 biomarker levels.

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meir survival analysis demonstrated a significant (p<0.001) difference across quartiles of preoperative biomarker levels (quartile 1 = blue line; quartiles 2/3 = red line; quartile 4 = green line). Adjustment was carried out using the STS ASCERT long-term mortality model.

Figure 2. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves for survival by quartile categories of postoperative Galectin-3 biomarker levels.

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meir survival analysis demonstrated a significant (p<0.001) difference across quartiles of preoperative biomarker levels (quartile 1 = blue line; quartiles 2/3 = red line; quartile 4 = green line). Adjustment was carried out using the STS ASCERT long-term mortality model.

The incidence of 6-year mortality was 1.7 per 100 person-years. The rate increased across elevated preoperative Gal-3 levels (Q1: 0.91; Q2/3: 1.32; Q4: 3.61) and postoperative Gal-3 levels (Q1: 0.86; Q2/3: 1.48; Q4: 3.24).

Subgroup analyses: Ejection fraction < 40

For those with low ejection fraction (N=163), pre and postoperative Gal-3 quartiles confirmed a trend of increased risk of long-term mortality following CABG surgery. Patients with elevated levels of preoperative Gal-3 conferred increased risk of long-term mortality (log rank p= 0.015), but after adjustment, the relationship was not significant (HR: 1.89; 95 % CI: 0.94 – 3.82). Similarly, patients with elevated postoperative Gal-3 had significantly increased risk of mortality (log rank p=0.001) but after adjustment the association was not statistically significant (HR: 2.10; 95 % CI: 0.89 – 4.89).

Comment

There are limited clinical data on the relationship between plasma Gal-3 and CABG outcomes. Our findings demonstrate that higher levels of Gal-3, a member of the lectin family of proteins, are associated with increased risk of long-term mortality for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Previous studies have examined the prognostic value of Gal-3 in individuals with existing heart failure.18 Elevated levels of Gal-3 have also been shown to be strongly associated with kidney injury, a finding that has been corroborated by previous studies.2, 9, 1921 To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the association of Gal-3 with long-term mortality for patients undergoing isolated CABG.

In this observational study of regional data, we used a prospective cohort to assess the relationship of Gal-3 and long-term mortality for patients undergoing isolated CABG. We found that patients in the highest quartile of preoperative Gal-3 had over three-times the long-term mortality risk after CABG than patients in lower quartiles of the serum biomarker. Similarly, we found that patients in the highest quartile of postoperative Gal-3 had 66% greater risk of long-term mortality than those patients with lower levels of Gal-3 after surgery.

Our findings indicate that pre-and-postoperative Gal-3 values are associated with long-term mortality in cardiac surgery patients and could potentially be used as a tool to identify patients at higher risk of death before surgery and at discharge. This study highlights the importance of assessing the true value of emerging cardiac fibrosis biomarkers beyond clinical risk factors and natriuretic peptides, particularly in light of the newly obtained American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class II recommendation for determination of prognosis in chronic HF.22

Gal-3 is a well-established biomarker for cardiac fibrosis, ventricular dysfunction and poor prognosis in heart failure.23, 24 Gal-3 is a soluble beta-galactoside-binding protein secreted by activated macrophages. Its main action is to bind to and activate the fibroblasts that form collagen and scar tissue, leading to progressive cardiac fibrosis.25 Gal-3 represents a link between inflammation and fibrosis, as circulating levels have been found elevated in several human fibrotic conditions, including pancreatitis and renal failure. In the heart, Gal-3 is thought to augment fibrosis and modulate immune response, both pivotal processes in maladaptive cardiac remodeling.26

Several studies have shown that elevated concentrations of Gal-3 provide important prognostic information. Increasing evidence has implicated Gal-3 in the pathogenesis and progression of heart failure.27, 28 Studies have shown that circulating Gal-3 levels predict future events in patients with acute and chronic HF. Van Kimmenade et al found that an elevated Gal-3 level was the best independent predictor of 60-day mortality in patients with acute decompensated HF.16 The study by de Boer et al confirmed the value of Gal-3 as an independent prognostic marker.11 Patients with elevated levels of Gal-3 in the highest quartile had three times higher risk of HF hospitalization and/or death. In a pooled analysis, Meijers et al found a significant relationship between near term hospitalization and unplanned rehospitalization with elevated levels of Gal-3 in HF patients.29

Fibrosis is a fundamental component of the adverse structural modeling of myocardium present in the failing heart. There is previously reported limited benefit of Gal-3 observed in previous studies where remodeling and fibrosis was observed at an advanced stage, it is conceivable that Gal-3 could have a more prominent role in earlier stages of fibrosis pathobiology and ventricular remodeling.30, 31 Given that progressive cardiac fibrosis is a central aspect in the progression of cardiac dysfunction, as well as the primary substrate for lethal arrhythmias and sudden death, it is intuitive that a blood marker of cardiac fibrosis would be independently associated with cardiovascular mortality. This study shows that increased serum levels of Gal-3 were predictive of cardiovascular mortality.

Limitations

The NNE Biomarker Study was a large, multicenter, regional investigation that prospectively enrolled patients across multiple hospitals, ensuring the generalizability of its subsequent findings. Our data are from 2004 – 2007, when the prevalence of heart disease related deaths was slightly higher compared to current data (221.6 vs 168.5 age-adjusted deaths per 100,000 people).32 While age-adjusted mortality rates have declined in recent years, heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the United States.32

An important aspect of this study is that the NNE mortality model included only patient characteristics and history, comorbid conditions, and patient clinical status variables immediately available to clinicians before surgery. We have limited our predicting variables to those known prior to operation. Therefore the variables alone cannot provide a perfect prediction for all-cause mortality.

Conclusion

We report that unadjusted elevated pre-and postoperative Gal-3 values are significantly associated with increased risk of mortality after cardiac surgery. Our findings suggest that Gal-3 can be used as a biomarker in risk stratification and estimating postsurgical prognosis. Clinical application of pre- and postoperative Gal-3 is beneficial when evaluating operative care strategies, discharge protocols and follow-up care after cardiac surgery.

Supplementary Material

1

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Meeting presentation: American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2018; Chicago, IL; November 10 – 12, 2018

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, Ford E, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott M, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Nichol G, O’Donnell C, Roger V, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Stafford R, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong N, Wylie-Rosett J and Hong Y. Heart disease and stroke statistics−−2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009;119:480–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tweddell JS, Sleeper LA, Ohye RG, Williams IA, Mahony L, Pizarro C, Pemberton VL, Frommelt PC, Bradley SM, Cnota JF, Hirsch J, Kirshbom PM, Li JS, Pike N, Puchalski M, Ravishankar C, Jacobs JP, Laussen PC and McCrindle BW. Intermediate-term mortality and cardiac transplantation in infants with single-ventricle lesions: risk factors and their interaction with shunt type. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:152–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Health, United States, 2009: With Special Feature on Medical Technology. 2010. [PubMed]
  • 4.Lancaster TS, Schill MR, Greenberg JW, Ruaengsri C, Schuessler RB, Lawton JS, Maniar HS, Pasque MK, Moon MR, Damiano RJ Jr. and Melby SJ. Long-Term Survival Prediction for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Validation of the ASCERT Model Compared With The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:1336–1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG and Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, Jones RH, Ryan TJ, Bennett E, Culliford AT, Isom OW, Gold JP and Rose EA. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2174–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peterson ED, Coombs LP, DeLong ER, Haan CK and Ferguson TB. Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery. Jama. 2004;291:195–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, Cigarroa JE, Disesa VJ, Hiratzka LF, Hutter AM Jr., Jessen ME, Keeley EC, Lahey SJ, Lange RA, London MJ, Mack MJ, Patel MR, Puskas JD, Sabik JF, Selnes O, Shahian DM, Trost JC and Winniford MD. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124:e652–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Amin HZ, Amin LZ and Wijaya IP. Galectin-3: a novel biomarker for the prognosis of heart failure. Clujul medical (1957). 2017;90:129–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bansal N, Katz R, Seliger S, DeFilippi C, Sarnak MJ, Delaney JA, Christenson R, de Boer IH, Kestenbaum B, Robinson-Cohen C, Ix JH and Shlipak MG. Galectin-3 and Soluble ST2 and Kidney Function Decline in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67:994–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.de Boer RA, Voors AA, Muntendam P, van Gilst WH and van Veldhuisen DJ. Galectin-3: a novel mediator of heart failure development and progression. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:811–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lok DJ, Lok SI, Bruggink-Andre de la Porte PW, Badings E, Lipsic E, van Wijngaarden J, de Boer RA, van Veldhuisen DJ and van der Meer P. Galectin-3 is an independent marker for ventricular remodeling and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. Clinical research in cardiology: official journal of the German Cardiac Society. 2013;102:103–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sharma UC, Pokharel S, van Brakel TJ, van Berlo JH, Cleutjens JP, Schroen B, Andre S, Crijns HJ, Gabius HJ, Maessen J and Pinto YM. Galectin-3 marks activated macrophages in failure-prone hypertrophied hearts and contributes to cardiac dysfunction. Circulation. 2004;110:3121–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Milting H, Ellinghaus P, Seewald M, Cakar H, Bohms B, Kassner A, Korfer R, Klein M, Krahn T, Kruska L, El Banayosy A and Kramer F. Plasma biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis and remodeling in terminal heart failure patients supported by mechanical circulatory support devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27:589–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Henderson NC, Mackinnon AC, Farnworth SL, Kipari T, Haslett C, Iredale JP, Liu FT, Hughes J and Sethi T. Galectin-3 expression and secretion links macrophages to the promotion of renal fibrosis. The American journal of pathology. 2008;172:288–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van Kimmenade RR, Januzzi JL Jr., Ellinor PT, Sharma UC, Bakker JA, Low AF, Martinez A, Crijns HJ, MacRae CA, Menheere PP and Pinto YM. Utility of amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, galectin-3, and apelin for the evaluation of patients with acute heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1217–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Coffin LH, Morton JR, Maloney CT, Nowicki ER, Levy DG, Tryzelaar JF, Hernandez F and et al. Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Circulation. 1992;85:2110–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang TJ, Wollert KC, Larson MG, Coglianese E, McCabe EL, Cheng S, Ho JE, Fradley MG, Ghorbani A, Xanthakis V, Kempf T, Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vasan RS and Januzzi JL. Prognostic Utility of Novel Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Stress:The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2012;126:1596–1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ho JE, Yin X, Levy D, Vasan RS, Magnani JW, Ellinor PT, McManus DD, Lubitz SA, Larson MG and Benjamin EJ. Galectin 3 and incident atrial fibrillation in the community. Am Heart J. 2014;167:729–34.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Suarez G and Meyerrose G. Heart failure and galectin 3. Annals of translational medicine. 2014;2:86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kortekaas KA, Hoogslag GE, de Boer RA, Dokter MM, Versteegh MI, Braun J, Marsan NA, Verwey HF, Delgado V, Schalij MJ and Klautz RJ. Galectin-3 and left ventricular reverse remodelling after surgical mitral valve repair. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15:1011–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr., Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ and Wilkoff BL. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:e147–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bayes-Genis A, de Antonio M, Vila J, Penafiel J, Galan A, Barallat J, Zamora E, Urrutia A and Lupon J. Head-to-head comparison of 2 myocardial fibrosis biomarkers for long-term heart failure risk stratification: ST2 versus galectin-3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:158–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.de Boer RA, Yu L and van Veldhuisen DJ. Galectin-3 in cardiac remodeling and heart failure. Current heart failure reports. 2010;7:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Felker GM, Fiuzat M, Shaw LK, Clare R, Whellan DJ, Bettari L, Shirolkar SC, Donahue M, Kitzman DW, Zannad F, Pina IL and O’Connor CM. Galectin-3 in ambulatory patients with heart failure: results from the HF-ACTION study. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:72–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hrynchyshyn N, Jourdain P, Desnos M, Diebold B and Funck F. Galectin-3: a new biomarker for the diagnosis, analysis and prognosis of acute and chronic heart failure. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;106:541–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lainscak M, Coletta AP, Sherwi N and Cleland JG. Clinical trials update from the Heart Failure Society of America Meeting 2009: FAST, IMPROVE-HF, COACH galectin-3 substudy, HF-ACTION nuclear substudy, DAD-HF, and MARVEL-1. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:193–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lok DJ, Van Der Meer P, de la Porte PW, Lipsic E, Van Wijngaarden J, Hillege HL and van Veldhuisen DJ. Prognostic value of galectin-3, a novel marker of fibrosis, in patients with chronic heart failure: data from the DEAL-HF study. Clinical research in cardiology: official journal of the German Cardiac Society. 2010;99:323–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meijers WC, Januzzi JL, deFilippi C, Adourian AS, Shah SJ, van Veldhuisen DJ and de Boer RA. Elevated plasma galectin-3 is associated with near-term rehospitalization in heart failure: a pooled analysis of 3 clinical trials. Am Heart J. 2014;167:853–60.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McCullough PA, Olobatoke A and Vanhecke TE. Galectin-3: a novel blood test for the evaluation and management of patients with heart failure. Reviews in cardiovascular medicine. 2011;12:200–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Papaspyridonos M, McNeill E, de Bono JP, Smith A, Burnand KG, Channon KM and Greaves DR. Galectin-3 is an amplifier of inflammation in atherosclerotic plaque progression through macrophage activation and monocyte chemoattraction. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2008;28:433–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.National Center for Health S. Health, United States Health, United States, 2016: With Chartbook on Long-term Trends in Health Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES