Abstract
Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) have the potential to enhance tendon repair via paracrine regulation of the inflammatory response to injury. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are secreted by ASCs, have shown promise in mediating this process. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of ASC EVs on early tendon healing using a mouse Achilles tendon injury and repair model. EVs were isolated from the conditioned medium of naïve and interferon gamma-primed ASCs and applied to the repair site via a collagen sheet. Tendon healing was assessed in NF-κB-luciferase reporter mice up to 7 days after suture repair. As anticipated, repair site NF-κB activity increased greater than 2-fold following tendon repair. Treatment with EVs from primed but not naïve ASCs effectively suppressed the response. Accordingly, the pro-inflammatory genes Il1b and Ifng were both dramatically increased in repaired tendons, while primed, but not naïve ASC EVs attenuated the response. Compared with control repairs, primed ASC EVs further reduced the rate of post-repair tendon gap formation and rupture and facilitated collagen formation at the injury site. Additional experiments demonstrated that EVs target macrophages and that primed ASC EVs were most effective in blocking macrophage NF-κB activity. Collectively, the findings of this study demonstrate that primed ASC EVs, similar to ASCs, attenuate the early tendon inflammatory response after injury via modulation of the macrophage inflammatory response. Clinical significance: These findings introduce a new cell-free therapy, derived from stem cells, for tendon repair with the potential for improved therapeutic efficacy and safety.
Keywords: Extracellular vesicle, mesenchymal stem cell, exosome, tendon injury, inflammation
INTRODUCTION
Tendon and ligament injuries comprise 45% of musculoskeletal trauma in the United States.1,2 Tendon transections are debilitating as intense post-repair inflammatory responses coupled with inadequate regenerative processes impair tendon gliding and reduce repair site strength.3–5 Frequently encountered complications following tendon suture are the formation of adhesions and the development of repair site gap formation or rupture.3,6,7
Recently, a number of clinically relevant mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapies with the potential to improve the outcomes of tendon repair have emerged.3,7–12 MSCs are regulatory signaling cells capable of paracrine regulation of cells’ response to injury.13–16 Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), which represent a similar type of adult stem cell, have been found to shift the phenotypic response of infiltrating macrophages from a default pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to an anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative M2 phenotype, thereby facilitating tendon healing.10,11,17 While the underlying mechanisms remain elusive, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been identified as one of primary paracrine effectors of ASCs.18–21 EVs are cell-derived vesicles that mediate cell-cell communication by delivering various functional molecules (e.g., proteins, mRNAs, and microRNAs) to selective recipient cells.22–25 Although nearly all cells can produce EVs, the composition and function of EVs are cell-type specific. MSC EVs from several origins including adipose tissue have recently been reported to modulate the macrophage inflammatory response21,24,26,27 and the function of MSC EVs may be further enhanced by priming MSCs with such inflammatory cytokine as interferon γ (IFNγ).21,26 Therefore, EVs produced by ASCs may provide an alternative to ASCs as a new potent therapeutic agent for tendon injury.
ASC EVs possess many attractive properties as a potential therapeutic candidate for tendon-specific application. Compared with other tissues, such as bone marrow, adipose tissue is abundant in the adult and contains a relatively high percentage of colony-forming unit cells.28 While ASCs have shown great therapeutic potential for tendon repair, 10,11,29 safety concerns have hindered their clinical application (i.e., tumorigenicity and undesired spontaneous differentiation).30 As a cell-free agent, ASC EVs avoid the safety concerns. Notably, EVs possess a unique membrane structure, which can protect, carry, and deliver a variety of enriched functional molecules capable of modulating recipient cell functions.22–25 In this regard, EVs may also provide superior drug stability, target specificity, and delivery capacity/efficacy compared to soluble factors. Moreover, an improved understanding of the molecular basis of EV functions will allow further engineering of defined components within EVs to provide improved therapeutic efficacy and safety.
The goal of this study was to investigate the role of ASC-derived EVs in regulating tissue responses in the earliest phases of tendon healing in a clinically relevant mouse Achilles tendon injury and repair model. Our hypothesis was that EVs, as a primary effector of ASCs, will effectively attenuate the early tendon inflammatory response after injury and thereby facilitate tendon healing.
METHODS
Animals
All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved and overseen by the Washington University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. NF-κB-GFP-luciferase (NGL) transgenic reporter mice for nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and wild type FVB mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME).31 Scleraxis-GFP (ScxGFP) tendon reporter mice were provided by Dr. Ronen Schweitzer.32 Mice were given ad libitum access to food and water and housed communally at a room temperature of 20–23°C on a 12-hour light/dark cycle.
Cell culture and EV preparation
Mouse macrophages were derived from bone marrow of femurs and tibiae of adult NGL or FVB mice of both sexes and cultured in a macrophage culture medium containing 10% L929 cell conditioned medium (a source of macrophage colony stimulating factor), 100 unit/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Life Technologies, catalog # 26140–079) in Minimum Essential Medium, Alpha (α-MEM; Corning, Manassas, VA, catalog # 10–022-CV). After five days, adherent cells were harvested and used for subsequent studies.
Mouse ASCs were isolated from the stromal vascular fraction of subcutaneous fat of adult ScxGFP or NGL mice of both sexes and expanded in ASC Culture Medium containing 10% FBS, 100 unit/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin in α-MEM as detailed elsewhere.28
EVs were isolated from the conditioned medium of ASC culture. ASCs at passage 2 to 4 were primed with 100 ng/ml IFNγ (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) overnight. The medium was subsequently removed. After three washes with sterile Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS; Life Technologies), the cells were further cultured in an EV collection medium (2% EV-free FBS in α-MEM) for 48 hours. Conditioned medium from ASC culture (150 ml from approximately 2.5E+07 cells per isolation) with or without IFNγ pre-treatment was collected and centrifuged at 500 × g for 10 min and 10,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C to remove large vesicles. After passing through a 0.22 μm filter, the medium was further centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 90 min at 4°C. The resulting EV-free supernatant was collected as EV-free conditioned medium. The EV-containing precipitate was further washed and re-suspended in 70 μl DPBS. Some isolated ASC EVs were fluorescently labeled with PKH26 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The EV-free FBS was prepared by ultracentrifugation of FBS at 100,000 × g for 20 hours to remove EVs in the FBS.
Characterization of mouse ASCs and ASC-derived EVs
ASCs were assessed for their ability to form colony-forming units (CFUs) and by their surface marker expression with antibodies specific for MSC markers CD29 (BD Biosciences, clone 18/CD29), CD44 (eBiosciences, clone IM7), and CD90 (BD Biosciences, clone 5E10)33 as previously described.28
Isolated ASC EVs were negatively stained with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA) and viewed on a JEOL 1200EX transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA). The size and concentration of EVs was determined at ZenBio Inc. (Research Triangle Park, NC) using qNano Gold (Izon Science Ltd. Christchurch, New Zealand). EV protein concentrations were determined with a Thermo Scientific™ Micro BCA™ Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). EV marker expression was determined by Western blot with either rabbit anti-CD9 (EXOAB-CD9A-1; System Biosciences) or rabbit anti-CD63 (EXOAB-CD63A-1, System Biosciences) antibodies followed by HRP-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (System Biosciences).
In vitro study design
In vitro studies were conducted with EVs produced by IFNγ-primed and naïve mouse ASCs (iEVs and EVs). The impact of ASC EVs on the macrophage inflammatory response was evaluated in EV-macrophage co-culture. Macrophages were stimulated with the pro-inflammatory cytokine Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β). IL-1β was chosen because it was the most significantly induced pro-inflammatory cytokine detected in the mouse Achilles tendon after injury and repair. To assess the EV-specific effect, EV collection medium (Medium) and EV-free conditioned medium from naïve and primed ASC culture (CM and iCM) were used as controls. The macrophage inflammatory responses were assessed via the NF-κB-luciferase reporter expressed by the NGL mice for the NF-κB-responsive luciferase activity and luciferase mRNA expression. All results were obtained from at least three independent experiments.
Macrophage assays
NGL macrophages (30,000 cells/cm2) were pre-treated with either one of the following: Medium, CM, iCM, EV or iEV for 24 hours (N=3–4 /condition in duplicate). EVs and iEVs were applied at a dose corresponding to an EV donor and recipient cell ratio of 20:1. The dose was determined based on a previously published study.17 The pre-treated cells were washed three times with DPBS. Macrophage NF-κB activity was subsequently determined in cell lysates 6 hours after treatment with IL-1β (5 ng/ml; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI). The results were normalized by the protein concentrations of respective samples. Macrophage gene expression was assessed at 24 hours after IL-1β (10 ng/ml) treatment in cell lysates by a SYBR green-based quantitative RT-PCR.28
Achilles tendon injury and repair model
Achilles tendon 2/3 transection was conducted at the midpoint level between the calcaneal insertion and the musculotendinous junction of the right Achilles tendon. All transected tendons were repaired with a 2-strand modified Kessler technique with surface locking followed by a simple peripheral suture (8–0 Ethilon, Ethicon Inc; Fig. 2A).34 Following repair, mice were allowed free movement after recovery from anesthesia.
In vivo delivery and detection of ASC EVs
A thin collagen sheet was prepared as described previously.10 ASC EVs were loaded to the surface of the collagen sheet via their collagen binding properties.35 The EV-laden collagen sheet was cut into strips (2.5 mm × 10 mm × 0.2 mm) that contained 5~6E+09 EVs from approximately one-half million ASCs and was applied around the repair site (Fig. 2A). The EV dose was determined based on the ASC dose used previously.10 The distribution of PKH26-labeled ASC EVs in Achilles tendons was determined in 6-month old ScxGFP tendon reporter mice (N=2) 7 days after implantation by fluorescence microscopy.
In vivo study design
To assess the impact of ASC EVs on the early tendon healing response after injury, a total of 32 adult NGL mice of both sexes (3–4 months, weight 27±5 g) were used. After Achilles tendon partial transection and repair, the mice were randomly divided into three groups: (1) collagen sheet only (Repair, N=11), (2) collagen sheet loaded with EVs from naïve ASCs (+EV, N=11), and (3) collagen sheet loaded with EVs from IFNγ-primed ASCs (+iEV, N=10). NF-κB activity at the repair site was determined in live mice via bioluminescence imaging at 1 day before (Pre) and 1, 3, and 7 days after (D1, D3, and D7) repair and treatment (N=4/group for Repair and +EV group, N=6 for +iEV group). All mice were euthanized 7 days after repair. Repaired tendons were surgically exposed as shown in the right panel of Fig. 2A. The integrity of repaired tendons was first assessed under a dissecting microscope. Postoperative gap formation and rupture were defined as partial and complete loss of the continuity of the repaired tendons, respectively. The assessed tendons were then dissected out for either gene expression (N=7/group) or histological assessment (N=4, 3, and 3 for Repair, +EV, and +iEV group, respectively).
NF-κB-luciferase imaging in vivo
Mice were injected intraperitoneally with D-luciferin (150mg/kg in PBS; Gold Biotechnology, St. Louis, MO) and imaged 10 minutes after injection under isoflurane anesthesia (2% vaporized in O2) in an IVIS 50 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Images were acquired with Living Image 4.3.1 software (Xenogen Corp., Alameda, CA). Injury site total photon flux (photons/sec) was measured from software-defined contour region of interest (ROI) that covers the injury site using Living Image 2.6 software. The result was normalized by the total photon flux of matching ROI of contralateral uninjured limb and expressed as a ratio of pre-injury level.
Total RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA from cultured cells were isolated with TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies) and RNeasy Mini Spin Column (Qiagen Sciences, MD, USA) as previously described.28 Achilles tendons were pulverized with a Mikro-Dismembrator U (Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany) and extracted in TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies). Total RNAs were isolated via phase separation using a Phase Lock Gel (5 Prime GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) and purified with RNeasy MinElute® Spin Columns (Qiagen Sciences, Germantown, MD). 500 ng of isolated total RNAs were reversely transcribed into cDNAs using a SuperScript™ IV VILO™ Master Mix (Life Technologies). The relative abundances of genes of interest were determined by SYBR green real-time PCR using Qiagen (Table 1) or custom primers (Table 2). Ipo8 was used as an endogenous reference gene. Changes in tendon gene expression were determined by the comparative Ct method and shown as fold changes relative to the expression levels in contralateral intact tendons. For genes that were near the detection limit in intact tendons, the results were reported as relative mRNA abundance (2-∆Ct).
Table 1.
Gene symbol | Gene name | Assay number | Accession number | Amplicon (nt) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Col1a1 | collagen, type I, alpha 1 | QT00162204 | NM_007742 | 98 |
Col2a1 | collagen, type II, alpha 1 | QT01055523 | NM_001113515 | 60 |
Col3a1 | collagen, type III, alpha 1 | QT2331301 | NM_009930 | 73 |
Il1b | interleukin 1, beta | QT01048355 | NM_008361 | 150 |
Mmp3 | matrix metallopeptidase 3 | QT00107751 | NM_010809 | 146 |
Mmp13 | matrix metallopeptidase 13 | QT00111104 | NM_008607 | 96 |
Scx | scleraxis | QT00166271 | NM_198885 | 67 |
Sox9 | SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 9 | QT00163765 | NM_011448 | 124 |
Tnf | tumor necrosis factor | QT00104006 | NM_013693 | 112 |
Tnmd | tenomodulin | QT00126427 | NM_022322 | 100 |
Table 2.
Gene symbol | Accession # | Forward primer | Reverse primer | Amplicon (nt) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ifng | NM_008337.4 | atctggaggaactggcaaaa | ttcaagacttcaaagagtctgagg | 89 |
Ipo8 | NM_001081113.1 | cacattgtcgctcgtctctt | acctgttgaattcccactgc | 112 |
Il6 | NM_001314054.1 | gctaccaaactggatataatcagga | ccaggtagctatggtactccagaa | 77 |
Mmp1a | NM_032006 | tgtgtttcacaacggagacc | gcccaagttgtagtagttttcca | 73 |
Nos2 | NM_010927.4 | ctttgccacggacgagac | tcattgtactctgagggctgac | 66 |
Nf-kb_Luc | AP018660.1 | gcaggcagttctatgaggca | gaaatgtccgttcggttggc | 476 |
Achilles tendon histology
Achilles tendons were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, embedded in paraffin, sectioned coronally at 5 μm thickness, and stained with a pentachrome stain kit (American MasterTech, Lodi, CA) as described previously.29 Collagen in stained sections exhibits a bright red-orange color. The percentage of collagen-stained area in a 1.2 mm tendon fragment that covers the site of tendon injury was determined with the area analysis tool of Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Adobe Systems Incorporated).
Statistical analysis
All data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s or Dunn’s post-hoc tests (when appropriate) were performed to compare gene expression levels, macrophage activities, or histomorphometry results among groups; two-tailed paired Student’s t-tests were used to compare gene expression levels and EV size and yield between two groups; a two-way ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) multiple comparisons were used to compare the effects of treatment and time on NF-κB activity at the repair site. An “N−1” Chi-squared test was used to compare the post-operative complication rate between treated and control repair groups.36 The significance level was set at P<0.05.
RESULTS
Isolated ASC EVs exhibit the properties of exosome
Mouse ASCs exhibited a CFU frequency of approximately 1 in 300 and an average population doubling time of 1.68±0.74 days (N=5 isolations), similar to those reported in the literature.28 Immunostaining revealed that nearly all isolated cells expressed the MSC markers CD29, CD44, and CD90 (Fig. 1A). The ASCs with and without IFNγ priming yielded similar amounts of vesicles (1.61E+09 ± 1.81E+09 and 1.67E+09 ± 4.64E+08 particles/ml culture, respectively; N=3/group, P=0.995). The resulting iEVs and EVs were of similar size (mode diameter 108 ± 2 nm and 113 ± 3 nm) and were within the size range of exosomes.22 Transmission electron microscopy also showed that EVs and iEVs exhibited similar size and morphology (left and middle panels in Fig. 1B) and that the EV collection medium was free from EVs (right panel in Fig. 1B). Western blot further confirmed that ASC EVs expressed the exosome markers CD9 and CD63 (Fig. 1C), thus possessing the properties of exosome.
ASC EVs target infiltrating inflammatory cells at the site of tendon injury
Partial tendon transection and repair was generated at the right Achilles tendon of adult mice (Fig. 2A). Approximately 5~6E+09 EVs were applied to the injury surface via a collagen sheet (Fig. 2A). Intense fluorescent signals from PKH 26-labeled EVs were detected at the injury site along tendon fibers in ScxGFP tendon reporter mice 7 days after implantation (Fig. 2B). Most of EV positive signals were co-localized with DAPI positive and ScxGFP negative cells (arrow heads in Fig. 2C), indicating ASC EVs primarily target infiltrating inflammatory cells at the injury center.
Primed ASC EVs attenuate NF-κB activity at the site of tendon injury and repair
The effects of EVs and iEV on the repair site inflammatory response were assessed in the NGL NF-κB-luciferase reporter mice via live bioluminescence imaging (Fig. 3A).31 Results showed dramatic increases in NF-κB activity at the repair site of untreated tendons at 3 days (Fig. 3, P<0.001 vs. Pre) and 7 days (Fig. 3, P=0.042 vs. Pre) but not at 1 day (Fig. 3, P=0.460 vs. Pre) following repair. By contrast, iEV treatment led to an early and modest increase in NF-κB activity at 1 day after repair (Fig. 3, P=0.021 vs. Pre). This increase was retained at 3 days after repair (Fig. 3; P=0.034 and 0.317 vs. pre and day 1, respectively) and substantially reduced at 7 days after repair (Fig. 3; P=0.548, 0.011, and 0.021 vs. Pre, D1, and D3, respectively). Overall, there were significant reductions of NF-κB activity in iEV-treated tendons compared to untreated tendons at 3 days (Fig. 3, P=0.014) and 7 days (Fig. 3, P=0.006) after repair. EV treatment did not alter the NF-κB activity in repaired tendons compared to the control repair (Fig. 3; P= 0.521, 0.193 and 0.364 vs. D1, D3 and D7, respectively). The NF-κB activity in EV-treated tendons was over 2-fold that of iEV-treated tendons at 7 days after repair (Fig. 3, P=0.028 vs. +iEV).
Primed ASC EVs reduce inflammatory gene expression in repaired tendons
The effect of ASC EVs on the tendon inflammatory response was further assessed at the gene expression level in Achilles tendons 7 days after repair by quantitative RT-PCR. In accordance with NF-κB activation, the expression levels of examined inflammatory genes Ifng, Nos2, Tnf, and Il6 were all significantly increased after tendon injury and repair (Fig. 4A–4D; P=0.000, 0.001, 0.000, and 0.005 vs. paired intact tendons, respectively). Moreover, Il1b, which was barely detectable in intact tendons, became the most abundant inflammatory gene examined after tendon repair (Fig. 4E). Treatment with iEV but not EVs significantly reduced Il1b expression in repaired tendons (Fig. 4E, P=0.007 vs. Repair and 0.011 vs. +EV). Similarly, significant differences in Ifng expression were detected among the three repair groups (Fig. 4A; ^, P=0.045, one-way ANOVA) and iEVs but not EVs trended toward reducing Ifng expression after injury.
ASC iEVs facilitate tendon matrix gene expression after tendon injury
The expression levels of tendon matrix-related genes were also compared among the three repair groups 7 days after injury. While Col1a1 and Col3a1 expression were increased in tendons from all three groups (Fig. 5A), Mmp1, a primary collagenase, which was undetectable in intact tendons, was induced after injury (Fig. 5A). Notably, treatment with both iEVs and EVs significantly attenuated the Mmp1 expression (Fig. 5A; ^, P=0.007, one-way ANOVA; P=0.013 and 0.015, +EV and +iEV vs. Repair, respectively) and iEV but not EV treatment further trended toward increasing both Col1a1 and Col3a1 expression (Fig. 5A; P=0.057 and 0.092 for Col1a1 and Col3a1, respectively, by one-way ANOVA). The tenogenic genes Scx and Tnmd were also increased in tendons from all groups; whereas, no significant group differences were detected (Fig. 5B). Unexpectedly, the cartilage matrix gene Col2a1 was increased in iEV-treated tendons (Fig. 5C; P=0.002 and 0.013 vs. Repair and +EV, respectively); and iEVs and EVs also increased Sox9 expression (Fig. 5C; P=0.005 and 0.009, +iEV and +EV vs. Repair, respectively). Nevertheless, the resulting Col2a1 level in iEV-treated tendons (2-∆Ct: 3.47 ± 1.01) was less than 1% of the Col1a1 level (2-∆Ct: 398.34 ± 92.12). Moreover, tendon injury triggers substantial increases in the cartilage-degrading genes Mmp13 and Mmp3 expression in tendons from all three groups (Fig. 5C).
ASC iEVs reduce post-operative complications and facilitate anabolic tissue response after tendon injury
At the tissue level, iEV-treated tendons showed a much lower gap-rupture rate compared with untreated tendons (Fig. 6A; P=0.033 vs. Repair). Pentachrome staining on Achilles tendon sections revealed collagen in intact tendon in a bright red-orange color (Fig. 6C). The tendon is surrounded by a loose and fatty paratenon tissue (Fig. 6C, below a yellow dotted line). Tendon injury induced inflammatory cell infiltration and matrix deposition at the site of tendon injury (between the two dotted lines in Fig. 6D–6F) and within the adjacent paratenon (Fig. 6D–6F, below the yellow dotted lines). While we did not detect consistent histological differences in the cellularity and vascularity among tendons from the different repair groups, the iEV-treated tendons exhibited more collagen staining at the site of tendon injury than did untreated and EV-treated tendons (Fig. 6B, P<0.001 and P=0.004 vs. Repair and +EV, respectively; Fig. 6D–6F).
ASC iEVs are more effective than EVs in suppressing NF-κB activation in macrophages
Next, we asked if the above observed in vivo effects of ASC EVs resulted from their ability to modulate the macrophage inflammatory response. NGL macrophages were co-cultured with either EVs or iEVs pre-labeled with PKH26 for 24h. Live fluorescence imaging detected PKH26 signals in nearly all cells without apparent differences between EVs (Fig. 7A) and iEVs (Fig. 7B). Moreover, a comparison between NGL (Fig. 7A and 7B) and wild type FVB macrophages (Fig. 7C) showed that macrophages with and without the NGL transgene took EVs with similar efficacy and that the EVs taken by either NGL or FVB macrophages were commonly localized to the cell bodies and not the protrusions.
The effects of EVs and iEVs on IL-1β-induced NF-κB activity in NGL macrophage were determined via a luciferin/luciferase-based assay. As shown in Fig. 7D, both EVs and iEVs but not CM or iCM blocked the IL-1ß-induced NF-κB activity in macrophages (Fig. 7D; P=0.114, 0.276, 0.006 and 0.005, +CM, +iCM, +EV, and +iEV vs. Medium, respectively). Unexpectedly, while EVs were less effective than iEVs in vivo, the two treatments were equally effective in vitro. This difference may be due to a more extreme inflammatory environment present in vivo, which requires a more potent anti-inflammatory agent. To test this concept, we increased the concentration of IL-1β from 5 ng/ml to 10 ng/ml and further compared the effect between EVs and iEVs on the NF-κB-responsive luciferase transgene expression by the more sensitive quantitative real-time PCR. The result confirmed that, while both EV and iEV were effective in reducing IL-1β-induced NF-κB activity in macrophages (Fig. 7E; P=0.008 and P<0.0001, +EV and +iEV vs. Medium, respectively), iEVs were nearly three times more effective than EVs (P=0.004, +iEV vs. +EV).
DISCUSSION
Prior studies in our laboratory have shown that ASCs can shift the macrophage phenotypic response to tendon injury from a default pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to a pro-regenerative M2 phenotype.10,11,17 Consistently, the findings of this study revealed that EVs, secreted by inflammation-stimulated ASCs, can attenuate the tendon inflammatory response in the earliest stages of healing after acute tendon injury and repair. Specifically, ASC EVs attenuated NF-κB activity at the injury site and reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine Il1b and the major collagenase Mmp1 expression. The effects of ASC EVs were coupled with their ability to directly target macrophages and to inhibit macrophage NF-κB signaling. ASCs have been found to facilitate regenerative healing by promoting collagen synthesis within the repair site.11 Similarly, ASC EVs were found to facilitate collagen gene expression and matrix production in injured tendons and to reduce post-operative rupture/gap formation. Moreover, a side-by-side comparison between ASC-produced EVs and soluble factors demonstrated that the anti-inflammatory paracrine function of ASCs is primarily mediated by EVs. Collectively, our results support the concept that ASC EVs are a promising substitute for ASCs as a therapeutic agent for tendon injury.
While the detailed mechanisms by which ASC EVs facilitate early tendon healing remain to be determined, our results support the concept that the effect is at least partially due to the ability of ASC EVs to attenuate the macrophage inflammatory response. Specifically, this study revealed that ASC EVs primarily target infiltrating inflammatory cells at the site of tendon injury and subsequently reduce NF-κB activity and downstream Il1b expression in injured tendons. Our in vitro results further demonstrated that EVs can directly target macrophages and can block the inflammatory NF-κB signaling in these cells. Consistent with these findings, a recent study showed that MSC-derived EVs can drive macrophage differentiation toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype and that implantation of EV-educated M2 macrophages can promote early tendon healing.27 In addition to macrophages, this study found that some ASC EVs were co-localized with tenocytes near the injury center. Therefore, ASC EVs may also directly facilitate tendon cell activity and function during tendon healing.
Our findings revealed that EVs produced by IFNγ-primed ASCs are more effective than EVs produced by naïve ASCs in curbing the inflammatory response in isolated macrophages and in repaired tendons. These findings are supported by several independent reports indicating that inflammation-stimulated stem cell EVs possess enhanced immunosuppressive functions21,26, and improved therapeutic efficacy in treating inflammation-related conditions.24,37 The priming effect has been reported to be associated with selective enrichment of certain regulatory microRNA cargos in primed EVs, such as let-7b and miR-146a, which are capable of modulating the macrophage inflammatory response. 24,37 It remains to be determined if a similar mechanism contributes to the iEV effects discovered in this study. Additionally, priming may modify the cell and tissue selectivity and therefore the effects of EVs. While this study found that macrophages take EVs and iEVs with similar efficacy in culture, a future study will be necessary to assess the possibility in vivo. The observed functional plasticity of ASCs and the potential dynamics of EV cargos introduce an opportunity to harness EV functions by controlling the biochemical environments of ASCs and, more directly, by controlling the active components of EV cargos.
This study detected significant increases in the cartilage-related genes Col2a1 (16-fold) and Sox9 (4-fold) expression in iEV-treated tendons. While cartilage matrix formation is undesirable in normal tendon tissue, the increases noted after tendon injury and repair might be protective. This concept is supported by our observations that tendon injury triggered substantial increases in Mmp13 (764-fold) and Mmp3 (37-fold) expression and both MMP3 and MMP13 preferentially degrade type II collagen and proteoglycan.38,39 Type II collagen and proteoglycan are constituents of tendon extracellular matrices. Therefore, the Sox9 and Col2a1 increases caused by iEV that counteract the Mmp13 and Mmp3 increases after tendon injury may be beneficial for tendon healing. Consistently, at the tissue level, the iEV-treated tendons showed a substantially lower rupture/gap formation rate than did untreated tendons. Moreover, the pentachrome staining that illustrated proteoglycan and cartilage in a green-blue color at the calcaneus and Achilles tendon enthesis did not detect cartilage formation but did demonstrate a higher percentage of collagen at the midsubstance of all three iEV-treated tendons examined. The role of cartilage matrix formation during tendon repair will be investigated in a future study.
There are several potential limitations of this study. First, as this study focused on the impact of ASC EVs in the early stage of tendon healing, only one time point was investigated. It remains to be determined if the favorable effects of ASC EVs in this early stage of healing will lead to improved functional outcomes in the long term. Second, gene expression analysis in repaired tendons is not cell-type specific; only a selective group of genes was assessed; and changes in gene expression do not necessarily lead to changes in protein expression. Therefore, our results may not reveal the full spectrum of ASC EV function in tendon healing. Future RNA-sequencing and proteomics studies in isolated macrophages and tenocytes following ASC EV treatment will be helpful in addressing this issue. Third, the dose of IFNγ used to produce iEVs is based on a previous study focusing on the immunoregulatory function of ASCs.17 A dose-response relationship between IFNγ and the effect of iEVs on the macrophage inflammatory response needs to be further determined. Moreover, the active EV cargos and the underlying molecular mechanisms that contribute to the observed effects are yet to be identified.
In summary, this is the first in vivo study of ASC-derived extracellular vesicles in tendon healing. Our results establish the concept that ASC EVs, similar to ASCs, can attenuate the repair site inflammatory response and can facilitate tendon matrix regeneration in the earliest stage of tendon healing. These findings introduce a new opportunity for the biological treatment of tendon injury.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
HS is an inventor with a pending patent that covers the ASC EVs and collagen sheet used in this study. This study is partially supported by the NIH R01 AR062947 and the Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital. We thank the Washington University Musculoskeletal Research Center (NIH P30 AR057235), Molecular Imaging Center (NIH P50 CA094056), and Wandy Beatty for their respective histology, bioluminiscence imaging, and transmission electron microscopy services. We thank Dr. Stavros Thomopoulos for his helpful feedback during the development of the project and preparation of the manuscript and Dr. Phyllis Hanson for her input on EV biology and technologies.
REFERENCES
- 1.Butler DL, Juncosa N, Dressler MR. 2004. Functional efficacy of tendon repair processes. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 6: 303–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pennisi E Tending tender tendons. 2002. Science 295: 1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Linderman SW, Gelberman RH, Thomopoulos S, Shen H Cell and biologic-based treatment of flexor tendon injuries. 2016. Oper Tech Orthop 26: 206–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Manning CN, Havlioglu N, Knutsen E, et al. 2014. The early inflammatory response after flexor tendon healing: a gene expression and histological analysis. J Orthop Res 32: 645–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gelberman RH, Shen H, Kormpakis I, et al. 2016. Effect of adipose-derived stromal cells and BMP12 on intrasynovial tendon repair: A biomechanical, biochemical, and proteomics study. J Orthop Res 34: 630–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thomopoulos S, Parks WC, Rifkin DB, Derwin KA. 2015. Mechanisms of tendon injury and repair. J Orthop Res 33: 832–839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schneider M, Angele P, Järvinen TAH, Docheva D. 2018. Rescue plan for Achilles: Therapeutics steering the fate and functions of stem cells in tendon wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 129: 352–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leong DJ, Sun HB. 2016. Mesenchymal stem cells in tendon repair and regeneration: basic understanding and translational challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1383: 88–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Aktas E, Chamberlain CS, Saether EE, et al. 2017. Immune modulation with primed mesenchymal stem cells delivered via biodegradable scaffold to repair an Achilles tendon segmental defect. J Orthop Res 35: 269–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shen H, Kormpakis I, Havlioglu N, et al. 2016. The effect of mesenchymal stromal cell sheets on the inflammatory stage of flexor tendon healing. Stem Cell Res Ther 7: 144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gelberman RH, Linderman SW, Jayaram R, et al. 2017. Combined administration of ASCs and BMP-12 promotes an M2 macrophage phenotype and enhances tendon healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475: 2318–2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lipner J, Shen H, Cavinatto L, et al. 2015. In vivo evaluation of adipose-derived stromal cells delivered with a nanofiber scaffold for tendon-to-bone repair. Tissue Eng Part A 21: 2766–2774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Phinney DG, Prockop DJ. 2007. Concise review: mesenchymal stem/multipotent stromal cells: the state of transdifferentiation and modes of tissue repair—current views. Stem Cells 25: 2896–2902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gimble JM, Grayson W, Guilak F, et al. 2011. Adipose tissue as a stem cell source for musculoskeletal regeneration. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 3: 69–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kapur SK, Katz AJ. 2013. Review of the adipose derived stem cell secretome. Biochimie 95: 2222–2228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hofer HR, Tuan RS. 2016. Secreted trophic factors of mesenchymal stem cells support neurovascular and musculoskeletal therapies. Stem Cell Res Ther 7: 131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Manning CN, Martel C, Sakiyama-Elbert SE, et al. 2015. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells modulate tendon fibroblast responses to macrophage-induced inflammation in vitro. Stem Cell Res Ther 6: 74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang B, Yin Y, Lai RC, et al. 2014. Mesenchymal stem cells secrete immunologically active exosomes. Stem Cells Dev 23: 1233–1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lo Sicco C, Reverberi D, Balbi C, et al. 2017. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators of Anti-Inflammatory Effects: Endorsement of Macrophage Polarization. Stem Cells Transl Med 6: 1018–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Robbins PD, Morelli AE. 2014. Regulation of Immune Responses by Extracellular Vesicles. Nat Rev Immunol 14: 195–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Domenis R, Cifù A, Quaglia S, et al. 2018. Pro inflammatory stimuli enhance the immunosuppressive functions of adipose mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes. Sci Rep 8: 13325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yáñez-Mó M, Siljander PR, Andreu Z, et al. 2015. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J Extracell Vesicles 4: 27066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, et al. 2007. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol 9: 654–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ti D, Hao H, Tong C, et al. 2015. LPS-preconditioned mesenchymal stromal cells modify macrophage polarization for resolution of chronic inflammation via exosome-shuttled let-7b. J Transl Med 13: 308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Anderson JD, Johansson HJ, Graham CS, et al. 2016. Comprehensive Proteomic Analysis of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes Reveals Modulation of Angiogenesis via Nuclear Factor-KappaB Signaling. Stem Cells 34: 601–613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Harting MT, Srivastava AK, Zhaorigetu S, et al. 2018. Inflammation-Stimulated Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Attenuate Inflammation. Stem Cells 36: 79–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chamberlain CS, Clements AB, Kink JA, et al. 2019. Extracellular vesicle-educated macrophages promote early Achilles tendon healing. Stem Cells 37: 652–662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shen H, Gelberman RH, Silva MJ, et al. 2013. BMP12 induces tenogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stromal cells. PLoS One 8: e77613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shen H, Jayaram R, Yoneda S, et al. 2018. The effect of adipose-derived stem cell sheets and CTGF on early flexor tendon healing in a canine model. Sci Rep 8: 11078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Volarevic V, Markovic BS, Gazdic M, et al. 2018. Ethical and Safety Issues of Stem Cell-Based Therapy Int J Med Sci 15: 36–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Everhart MB, Han W, Sherrill TP, et al. 2006. Duration and intensity of NF-kappaB activity determine the severity of endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. J Immunol 176: 4995–5005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pryce BA; Brent AE; Murchison ND, et al. 2007. Generation of transgenic tendon reporters, ScxGFP and ScxAP, using regulatory elements of the scleraxis gene. Dev Dyn 236: 1677–1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, et al. 2006. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 8:315–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yoneda S, Okubo H, Linderman SW, et al. 2018. The effect of modified locking methods and suture materials on Zone II flexor tendon repair-An ex vivo study. PLoS One 13: e0205121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Narayanan R, Huang CC, Ravindran S. 2016. Hijacking the Cellular Mail: Exosome Mediated Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells Int 2016:3808674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Campbell I 2007. Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Stat Med 26: 3661–3675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Song Y, Dou H, Li X, et al. 2017. Exosomal miR-146a contributes to the enhanced therapeutic efficacy of interleukin-1β-primed mesenchymal stem cells against sepsis. Stem Cells 35: 1208–1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Klein T, Bischoff R. 2011. Physiology and pathophysiology of matrix metalloproteases. Amino Acids 4: 271–290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fosang AJ, Last K, Knäuper V, et al. 1996. Degradation of cartilage aggrecan by collagenase-3 (MMP-13). FEBS Lett 80: 17–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]