Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate if body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 is associated with risk of postoperative complications, receipt of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT), length of hospital stay (LOS), perioperative death, or hospital readmission rate following renal mass surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
After Institutional Review Board approval, comprehensive information was collected for patients treated with surgery for renal mass from 2000 to 2015 at one institution. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the association of BMI ≥ 40 among other putative risk factors for perioperative outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 1048 patients were treated surgically, including 115 (11%) with BMI > 40. Minimally invasive and open surgical approaches were used for 480 (45.8%) and 568 (54.2%) patients, respectively. Morbid obesity was not associated with risk of major complications, overall complications, receipt of PBT, LOS, hospital readmission rate, or perioperative death. Charlson comorbidity index was the only independent predictor of major complications following renal mass surgery, P = .0006, per point odds ratio 1.2 (95%C.I. 1.08–1.32). Surgical site infections (SSIs) were more common in patients with BMI ≥ 40 vs BMI < 40 (10.5% vs 4.8%, P = .01). Following multivariable analysis, BMI ≥ 40 was the only independent predictor of SSIs, odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.32–5.13; P = .006.
CONCLUSION
Morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) is an independent predictor of developing SSIs following renal mass surgery. Morbid obesity is not predictive of risk for major complications, receipt of PBT, hospital readmission, perioperative death, or LOS.
The World Health Organization defines the most severe form of obesity as class 3, morbid, or extreme obesity for patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40.1 These patients have the highest prevalence of comorbidities and a shortened life expectancy.2 When compared to patients defined as overweight (BMI 25–29.9) or mildly obese (BMI 30–34.9), morbidly obese patients are more likely to have serious health problems, including: hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, dyslipidemia, sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, liver disease, and respiratory dysfunction.3,4 Given the rapidly rising incidence of morbid obesity in the United States2,3 and the increased prevalence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) among obese patients,5,6 it is critical to consider how severe obesity affects perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing renal surgery.
Several studies have demonstrated that surgical procedures using general anesthesia are more technically difficult in morbidly obese patients,7 and potentially result in worse perioperative outcomes.8,9 Furthermore, extremely obese patients have a higher incidence of comorbidities, which are associated with an increased risk for postoperative complications following RCC surgery,10 but there are minimal data that specifically evaluate perioperative outcomes for extremely obese patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate if morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) is associated with increased risk of postoperative complications, receipt of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT), length of hospital stay (LOS), or hospital readmission rate following renal cancer surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
After Institutional Review Board approval, an institutional database identified patients treated with either radical or partial nephrectomy for renal mass from January 2000 until September 2015 at our institution. Comprehensive clinical and pathologic information was collected for each patient including Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) without adding points for age or urological cancer diagnosis, and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score as described previously.11 Tumor stage and pathologic definitions were assigned using the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition and 2013 International Society of Urological Pathology statement.12 Perioperative transfusions were defined as occurring within 30 days after surgery. Complications occurring within 90 days of surgery were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system.13
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of BMI ≥ 40 among other clinical and pathologic variables with perioperative complications. Significant variables following univariable analysis were used for multivariable analysis. Specific predictors of hospital readmission within 30 days postoperatively and LOS were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Spearman correlation coefficients, and a general linear model was used to perform multivariate analysis when appropriate. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant and the SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.
RESULTS
A total of 1048 patients underwent renal surgery from 2000 to 2015, including 115 (11.0%) patients with BMI ≥ 40. Overall median BMI was 29.5 (interquartile range 25.8–34.6). Baseline clinical and pathological characteristics for each of these groups are shown in Table 1. Morbidly obese patients were more likely to be younger (P = .003), have a diabetes diagnosis (P < .0001), use metformin (P = .001), have a flank incision (P = .03), and were less likely to have distant metastases at presentation (P = .02). The most common pathology was RCC in 894 (85.3%) followed by 132 (12.6%) benign renal neoplasms (angiomyolipoma, oncocytoma, benign cystic masses), and other malignant neoplasms in 22 (2.1%), including sarcomas, lymphoma, squamous cell cancer, and metastatic cancer from other sites.
Table 1.
Patient and disease characteristics
| All | BMI <40 | BMI ≥ 40 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 1048 | N = 933 | N = 115 | P Value | |
| Median age (IQR) | 59.2 (50.2–67.7) | 60 (50.6–68.4) | 56.5 (49.6–62.8) | .003 |
| Median BMI | 29.5 (25.8–34.6) | 28.6 (25.3–32.4) | 44.4 (41.3–49.7) | |
| Median CCI | 0 (0–2) | 0 (0–2) | 1 (0–2) | .53 |
| Diagnosis of diabetes | 181 (17.5) | 144 (15.7) | 37 (32.2) | <.0001 |
| Insulin use | 73 (11.3) | 60 (10.6) | 13 (16.7) | .11 |
| Metformin use | 65 (10.1) | 49 (8.7) | 16 (20.5) | .001 |
| Smoking history (%) | .59 | |||
| Never | 431 (44.5) | 382 (44.4) | 49 (45) | |
| Current | 175 (18.1) | 152 (17.7) | 23 (21.1) | |
| Prior history | 363 (37.5) | 326 (37.9) | 37 (33.9) | |
| 2000–2008 | 524 (50) | 468 (50.2) | 56 (48.7) | .77 |
| 2009–2015 | 524 (50) | 465 (49.8) | 59 (51.3) | |
| Approach | .19 | |||
| Laparoscopic or robotic | 480 (45.8) | 434 (46.5) | 46 (40.0) | |
| Open | 568 (54.2) | 499 (53.5) | 69 (60.0) | |
| Incision type | .03 | |||
| Flank | 300 (28.6) | 253 (27.1) | 47 (40.9) | |
| Subcostal | 104 (9.9) | 93 (10.0) | 11 (9.6) | |
| Midline | 94 (9.0) | 87 (9.3) | 7 (6.1) | |
| Chevron | 70 (6.7) | 66 (7.1) | 4 (3.5) | |
| Laparoscopic | 480 (45.8) | 434 (46.5) | 46 (40.0) | |
| Prior abdominal surgery | 506 (49.8) | 445 (49.4) | 61 (53.0) | .46 |
| Pathology | ||||
| Benign renal neoplasms | 132 (12.6) | 125 (13.4) | 7 (6.9) | .06 |
| Other malignancies | 22 (2.1) | 20 (2.1) | 2 (1.7) | |
| Renal cell carcinoma | 894 (85.3) | 788 (84.5) | 106 (92.2) | |
| Median nephrometry score | 9 (7–10) | 9 (7–10) | 9 (7–10) | .41 |
| Type of nephrectomy | .58 | |||
| Partial nephrectomy | 222 (24.8) | 198 (25.1) | 24 (22.6) | |
| Radical nephrectomy | 672 (75.2) | 590 (74.9) | 82 (77.4) | |
| T stage | .29 | |||
| T1 | 512 (57.4) | 452 (57.5) | 60 (56.6) | |
| T2 | 107 (12) | 90 (11.5) | 17 (16) | |
| T3 | 258 (28.9) | 229 (29.1) | 29 (27.4) | |
| T4 | 15 (1.7) | 15 (1.9) | 0 | |
| N1 | 46 (5.2) | 41 (5.2) | 5 (4.7) | .83 |
| M1 | 105 (11.7) | 100 (12.7) | 5 (4.7) | .02 |
| Venous thrombus | ||||
| None | 721 (80.8) | 631 (80.3) | 90 (84.9) | .47 |
| Renal vein | 101 (11.3) | 91 (11.6) | 10 (9.4) | |
| IVC < 2 cm | 16 (1.8) | 15 (1.9) | 1 (0.9) | |
| IVC > 2 cm | 29 (3.3) | 28 (3.6) | 1 (0.9) | |
| IVC below diaphragm | 12 (1.4) | 11 (1.4) | 1 (0.9) | |
| IVC above diaphragm | 13 (1.5) | 10 (1.3) | 3 (2.8) | |
BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; IQR, interquartile range; IVC, inferior vena cava.
Major Complications
A total of 76 patients (7.3%) experienced a major complication (≥Clavien 3) within 90 days of surgery. Cardiovascular and pulmonary complications accounted for the majority of major complications, occurring in 44 (59.5%) patients. In addition, infectious, gastrointestinal, hematologic, and genitourinary complications occurred in 8, 8, 7, and 9 patients, respectively. Urine leak requiring intervention occurred in 7 of 222 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy. Also, percentage is 3.2%.
Patients with BMI ≥ 40 were not more likely to experience major complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–1.44; P = .23) (Table 2). The only independent predictors of major complications were CCI (per point) (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07–1.31; P = .001) and incision type (P = .02). Nineteen (1.8%) patients died within the first 90 days following surgery. There was no difference in rate of perioperative mortality for patients with BMI ≥ 40 and BMI < 40 (3.6% vs 1.7%, P = .15).
Table 2.
Risk factors associated with major complications within 90 days of renal mass surgery
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P |
| Age | 1.02 | 1.00–1.04 | .02 | 1.01 | 0.99–1.04 | .21 |
| CCI | 1.24 | 1.12–1.36 | <.0001 | 1.18 | 1.07–1.31 | .001 |
| BMI ≥ 40 vs BMI < 40 | 0.57 | 0.22–1.44 | .23 | |||
| BMI ≥ 35 vs BMI < 35 | 0.76 | 0.42–1.39 | .38 | |||
| Pathology | ||||||
| Renal cell carcinoma | Ref | .10 | ||||
| Other | 0.49 | 0.21–1.14 | ||||
| Incision type | ||||||
| Flank | Ref | <.0001 | Ref | .02 | ||
| Subcostal | 1.74 | 0.80–3.80 | 1.28 | 0.56–2.92 | ||
| Midline | 1.85 | 0.83–4.14 | 1.60 | 0.70–3.63 | ||
| Chevron | 4.01 | 1.92–8.37 | 2.79 | 1.18–6.61 | ||
| Laparoscopic or robotic | 0.61 | 0.32–1.18 | 0.66 | 0.34–1.28 | ||
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Never | Ref | .34 | ||||
| Former smoker | 1.58 | 0.83–3.03 | ||||
| Current smoker | 1.35 | 0.78–2.33 | ||||
| Presence of tumor thrombus | 3.29 | 1.98–5.46 | <.0001 | 1.59 | 0.84–3.02 | .16 |
| Year of surgery | ||||||
| 2000–2008 vs 2009–2015 | 0.84 | 0.52–1.36 | .48 | |||
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; other abbreviations as in Table 1.
A separate multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate association with major complications for the 894 patients with RCC treated surgically. Putative risk factors that were analyzed included approach, radical vs partial nephrectomy, 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage, presence of venous thrombus, concurrent lymph node dissection, BMI, CCI, age, smoking status, and year of surgery. Independent predictors of major complications among surgically treated patients with RCC included presence of venous thrombus (OR 2.94, 95% CI1.72–5.01; P < .0001) and CCI (per point) (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08–1.32; P = .007).
Overall Complications Within the First 90 Days
Complications were identified in 246 (24.1%) patients during the 90 days following surgery. The most common complications were infectious (urinary tract infection, surgical site infection [SSI], Clostridium difficile colitis, etc.) in 103 (37.6%) patients; cardiovascular (myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, cerebrovascular accident, etc.) in 42(15.3%) patients; pulmonary (respiratory failure, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, etc.) in 42 (15.3%) patients; gastrointestinal (ileus, bowel obstruction, pancreatitis etc.) and hematologic (symptomatic hematoma, hemorrhage, venous thromboembolic events, pseudoaneurysm) in 23 (8.4%) patients; genitourinary (acute kidney injury, unplanned dialysis, urine leak, etc.) in 16 (5.8%) patients; and miscellaneous complications (allergic reactions, chronic pain, corneal abrasion, etc.) in 20 (8.1%) patients. Predictors of overall complications following surgery are shown in Table S1.
Initial analysis identified BMI ≥ 40 as a predictor of higher risk for overall complication (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.19–2.75; P = .006). However, SSIs were disproportionately represented in the group with BMI ≥ 40 when compared to patients with BMI < 40 (10.7% vs 4.2%, P = .003). If SSIs are subsequently excluded from the analysis of predictors of complications, BMI > 40 is not associated with overall complications following surgery. Predictors of overall complications excluding SSI are shown in Table 3. Independent predictors of any complication following renal cancer surgery included age (per year) (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.03), RCC vs other renal tumors (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.90; P = .02) and incision type (P = .0001).
Table 3.
Clinical and pathological factors associated with risk of any complication within 90 days of renal mass surgery, wound infections excluded
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P |
| Age | 1.02 | 1.01–1.03 | .001 | 1.02 | 1.00–1.03 | .02 |
| CCI | 1.10 | 1.03–1.19 | .007 | 1.04 | 0.97–1.13 | .28 |
| BMI ≥ 40 vs BMI < 40 | 1.30 | 0.82–2.07 | .27 | |||
| BMI ≥ 35 vs BMI < 35 | 1.06 | 0.74–1.52 | .75 | |||
| Approach | ||||||
| Open | Ref | |||||
| Laparoscopic or robotic | 0.45 | 0.33–0.62 | <.0001 | |||
| Pathology | ||||||
| Renal cell carcinoma | Ref | .002 | Ref | .02 | ||
| Other | 0.42 | 0.25–0.73 | 0.51 | 0.29–0.90 | ||
| Incision type | ||||||
| Flank | Ref | <.0001 | .0001 | |||
| Subcostal | 1.65 | 0.99–2.76 | 1.39 | 0.81–2.38 | ||
| Midline | 1.57 | 0.91–2.71 | 1.50 | 0.86–2.62 | ||
| Chevron | 2.71 | 1.55–4.74 | 2.39 | 1.26–4.56 | ||
| Laparoscopic or robotic | 0.62 | 0.42–0.91 | 0.60 | 0.40–0.89 | ||
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Never | Ref | .72 | ||||
| Former smoker | 1.06 | 0.68–1.65 | ||||
| Current smoker | 1.16 | 0.82–1.63 | ||||
| Presence of tumor thrombus | 2.23 | 1.54–3.23 | <.0001 | 1.06 | 0.66–1.68 | .82 |
| Year of surgery | ||||||
| 2000–2008 vs 2009–2015 | 1.04 | 0.76–1.41 | .82 | |||
SSIs
SSIs were identified in 50 (4.9%) patients overall. The only independent predictor of developing SSI was BMI ≥ 40 (OR2.74, 95% CI 1.39–5.42; P = .004). A total of 181 (17.5%) patients had a diagnosis of diabetes at the time of surgery. Post-operative wound infections were not associated with diabetes diagnosis (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.78–2.96, P = .22), insulin use (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.33–2.81, P = .95), or metformin use (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.56–3.98, P = .43). Overall, 16 (1.5%) patients developed an incisional hernia following renal mass surgery. Prior abdominal surgery was not associated with increased risk of developing SSI (P = .09). Risk of developing incisional hernia was associated with neither BMI > 40 or prior SSI.
Receipt of Blood Transfusion
PBT within 30 days following surgery was received by 186(17.8%) patients overall, and 98 (11.2%) for 875 patients without venous thrombus. Morbid obesity was not associated with increased risk of transfusion (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.68–1.81; P = .69). After multivariate analysis, the presence of venous tumor thrombus (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.52–3.93; P = .0002), CCI per point (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04–1.25; P = .004), and incision type (P < .0001) were associated with increased risk of receiving blood transfusion.
Length of Hospitalization and Readmission Rates
Median hospital LOS was 4 days (interquartile range 3–6). BMI ≥ 40 was not associated with longer LOS (P = .06). Independent predictors of increased LOS after multivariate analysis included age (P < .0001), incision type (P < .0001), presence of venous tumor thrombus (P < .0001), and CCI (P = .02). A total of 52 (5.1%) patients were re-admitted to the hospital within 30 days of surgical discharge. Morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) was not associated with higher readmission rates (P = .56). CCI per point was the only predictor of hospital readmission (OR 1.17, 95% CI1.04–1.31; P = .009).
Expanded Analysis of BMI Impact
In a separate analysis, BMI (per point) was evaluated as a continuous variable and was not associated with risk of major complications (P = .83) but was associated with SSI risk (P = .0002). A second additional analysis compared outcomes for patients with ideal body weight (BMI 20–24.9) to overweight (BMI 25–29.9), obese (BMI 30–39.9), and morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40) patients. There was no difference in risk of major complications among the 4 groups (P = .36). However, a sequential increase in SSI risk (P = .003) was demonstrated with increase in BMI: ideal BMI (referent), overweight BMI (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.5–4.8), obese BMI 30–39.9 (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1–9.2), and morbidly obese BMI (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.8–18.0).
DISCUSSION
Patients with morbid obesity may weigh 100 pounds or more over their ideal body weight and have a high incidence of serious health problems.3,4 Morbid obesity may increase the technical difficulty of surgery,14 the risk for SSIs,15 and perioperative complications.7,16 The current study has identified that BMI ≥ 40 is an independent predictor of risk for developing postoperative wound infections. Notably, patients with BMI ≥ 40 did not have higher rates of major complications, PBTs, hospital readmission, or longer hospitalization following surgery compared to patients with lower BMI. This study suggests that the presence of comorbidities and not obesity itself predicts the risk of major complications, and renal surgery should remain a standard treatment for well-selected patients regardless of obesity. Further studies should investigate strategies to decrease wound infection in extremely obese patients.
With the exception of SSIs, this study identified no difference in postoperative outcomes for patients with BMI ≥ 40. Prior studies of obese patients following renal surgery do not separately evaluate outcomes for the most obese patients, or contain only a few morbidly obese patients.17–21 Patients with BMI ≥ 40 comprised 18 of 1336(1.3%) and 28 of 250 (11.2%) in recent studies that specifically evaluate surgical outcomes of RCC and obesity.22,23 In the current study, there are 115 (11.0%) patients with BMI ≥ 40 with a renal mass treated surgically, although the statewide incidence of morbid obesity is only 2.8%.24 This relatively large cohort of morbidly obese patients allows for a better evaluation of perioperative outcomes, which is important, given the rising incidence of extreme obesity.
Several prior studies have reported outcomes following minimally invasive surgery in obese patients.18,19,23 In the current study, use of a laparoscopic or robotic approach was not independently associated with overall complications, major complications, wound complications, or hospital re-admission, although minimally invasive approaches were associated with decreased incidence of blood transfusion and shorter hospital stay after surgery. Charlson comorbidity index is a known predictor of complications following kidney surgery10 and was associated with higher risk of major complications, blood transfusion, and hospital readmission in the current series. Although comorbidities are reported as more common in morbidly obese patients,2–4 the median CCI was similar between BMI ≥ 40 patients and BMI < 40 cohorts in this study, which likely reflects selection of healthier patients for surgery in both cohorts. The results of these analyses suggest that worse outcomes are associated with presence of comorbidities and not extreme obesity itself, although surgery may be more technically challenging.
Significantly higher rates of SSIs were demonstrated for morbidly obese patients following renal surgery, and strategies to decrease wound infections in this patient population deserve further study. In nonurologic surgery, multiple studies have described an increased risk of SSI for morbidly obese patients; however, the mechanism underlying the increased risk remains unclear.8,25 The use of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to surgery is a well-established practice, with recent evidence suggesting that extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) may benefit certain high-risk patients. In a recent cohort study, obese patients following combined hysterectomy and panniculectomy who received EAP were significantly less likely to develop SSI vs standard preoperative antibiotics.26 However, EAP also increases the risk of C. difficile infection,27 and must be used with caution. Clinical trials have also investigated whether high concentration-inspired oxygen may decrease SSI by increasing incisional tissue oxygenation, but a recent meta-analysis demonstrated discouraging results.28 Prophylactic placement of subcutaneous drains at the time of surgery is also common in bariatric, colorectal, and gynecologic surgery. However, data demonstrating efficacy of drains to reduce SSI are limited,29–31 with a recent study suggesting that subcutaneous drains may reduce the risk of SSI in selected patients with subcutaneous fat thickness of >2 cm on axial imaging or for patients undergoing emergent operations.32
Limitations of this study include its retrospective analysis and biases associated with selection of patients for surgery. Multivariable analyses were used to consider effects of baseline differences between BMI ≥ 40 or <40 cohorts but there exists a possibility for unmeasured bias favoring selection of healthier patients for surgery. However, the disproportionate representation of morbidly obese patients in our cohort (371% of the regional incidence of morbid obesity) argues against favorable selection of only healthy obese patients. Finally, because our center has significant experience with care of extremely obese patients, it is possible that these findings may not be generalizable to a community hospital setting and morbidly obese patients should generally not be expected to have identical results to ideal weight patients given the increase in technical difficulty for surgery in these patients. Furthermore, high BMI patients may benefit from surgery at tertiary centers because of the availability of specialized bariatric equipment such as high weight capacity operating room tables, hospital beds, and computed tomography scanners, or larger rooms with more aggressive postsurgical physical therapy. In addition, anesthesia providers and nursing staff play critical roles in perioperative and postoperative care and should be experienced in specialized care of bariatric patients.
CONCLUSION
Morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) is an independent predictor of risk for developing postoperative SSIs following renal mass surgery. Well-selected morbidly obese patients do not have higher rates of major complications, PBTs, hospital read-mission, or longer length of hospitalization. Surgery for renal masses should be a standard treatment for well-selected patients regardless of obesity.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.
APPENDIX
Supplementary Data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.018.
References
- 1.Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:ixii, 1–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kitahara CM, Flint AJ, Berrington de Gonzalez A, et al. Association between class III obesity (BMI of 40–59 kg/m2) and mortality: a pooled analysis of 20 prospective studies. PLoS Med. 2014; 11:e1001673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sturm R, Hattori A. Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37:889–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Malnick SD, Knobler H. The medical complications of obesity. QJM. 2006;99:565–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Bodymass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371:569–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blute ML, Zorn K, Grimes M, et al. Extreme obesity does not predict poor cancer outcomes following surgery for renal cell cancer. BJU Int. 2015;doi: 10.1111/bju.13381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.King DR, Velmahos GC. Difficulties in managing the surgical patient who is morbidly obese. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:S478–S482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bamgbade OA, Rutter TW, Nafiu OO, Dorje P. Postoperative complications in obese and nonobese patients. World J Surg. 2007;31:556–560, discussion 561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Kelz RR, et al. Medical and financial risks associated with surgery in the elderly obese. Ann Surg. 2012;256:79–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tomaszewski JJ, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A, et al. Assessing the burden of complications after surgery for clinically localized kidney cancer by age and comorbidity status. Urology. 2014;83:843–849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182:844–853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Delahunt B, Egevad L, Montironi R, Srigley JR. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on renal neoplasia: rationale and organization. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:1463–1468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stewart SB, Freedland SJ. Influence of obesity on the incidence and treatment of genitourinary malignancies. Urol Oncol. 2011;29:476–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thelwall S, Harrington P, Sheridan E, Lamagni T. Impact of obesity on the risk of wound infection following surgery: results from a nationwide prospective multicentre cohort study in England. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:1008, e1–e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bamgbade OA, Rutter TW, Nafiu OO, Dorje P. Postoperative complications in obese and nonobese patients. World J Surg. 2007;31:556–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Choi Y, Park B, Jeong BC, et al. Body mass index and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a clinical-based cohort and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:625–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fugita OE, Chan DY, Roberts WW, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: outcomes and technical considerations. Urology. 2004;63:247–252, discussion 252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gong EM, Orvieto MA, Lyon MB, Lucioni A, Gerber GS, Shalhav AL. Analysis of impact of body mass index on outcomes of laparoscopic renal surgery. Urology. 2007;69:38–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parker AS, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Thiel DD, Leibovich BC, Blute ML. Greater body mass index is associated with better pathologic features and improved outcome among patients treated surgically for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2006;68:741–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rogde ÅJ, Gudbrandsdottir G, Hjelle KM, Sand KE, Bostad L, Beisland C. Obesity is associated with an improved cancer-specific survival, but an increased rate of postoperative complications after surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012;46:348–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Waalkes S, Merseburger AS, Kramer MW, et al. Obesity is associated with improved survival in patients with organ-confined clear-cell kidney cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21:1905–1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Isac WE, Autorino R, Hillyer SP, Hernandez AV, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH. The impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2012;110:E997–E1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Henkel DS, Remington PL, Athens JK, Gould JC. Trends in bariatric surgery for morbid obesity in Wisconsin: a 6-year follow-up. WMJ. 2010;109:21–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huttunen R, Syrjanen J. Obesity and the risk and outcome of infection. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37:333–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.El-Nashar SA, Diehl CL, Swanson CL, et al. Extended antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of surgical-site infections in morbidly obese women who undergo combined hysterectomy and medically indicated panniculectomy: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:306, e1–e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Calvert JK, Holt SK, Mossanen M, et al. Use and outcomes of extended antibiotic prophylaxis in urological cancer surgery. J Urol. 2014;192:425–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Patel SV, Coughlin SC, Malthaner RA. High-concentration oxygen and surgical site infections in abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis. Can J Surg. 2013;56:E82–E90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gates S, Anderson ER. Wound drainage for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(12):CD004549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Numata M, Godai T, Shirai J, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous passive drainage for the prevention of superficial surgical site infections in open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:353–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shaffer D, Benotti PN, Bothe A Jr, Jenkins RL, Blackburn GL. A prospective, randomized trial of abdominal wound drainage in gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg. 1987;206:134–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fujii T, Tabe Y, Yajima R, et al. Effects of subcutaneous drain for the prevention of incisional SSI in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1151–1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
