Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2019 Dec 12;7:821. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00821

Bodipy Derivatives as Triplet Photosensitizers and the Related Intersystem Crossing Mechanisms

Kepeng Chen 1,†, Yu Dong 1,†, Xiaoyu Zhao 1,2, Muhammad Imran 1, Geliang Tang 1, Jianzhang Zhao 1,2,*, Qingyun Liu 3,*
PMCID: PMC6920128  PMID: 31921760

Abstract

Recently varieties of Bodipy derivatives showing intersystem crossing (ISC) have been reported as triplet photosensitizers, and the application of these compounds in photocatalysis, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and photon upconversion are promising. In this review we summarized the recent development in the area of Bodipy-derived triplet photosensitizers and discussed the molecular structural factors that enhance the ISC ability. The compounds are introduced based on their ISC mechanisms, which include the heavy atom effect, exciton coupling, charge recombination (CR)-induced ISC, using a spin converter and radical enhanced ISC. Some transition metal complexes containing Bodipy chromophores are also discussed. The applications of these new triplet photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy, photocatalysis, and photon upconversion are briefly commented on. We believe the study of new triplet photosensitizers and the application of these novel materials in the abovementioned areas will be blooming.

Keywords: Bodipy, intersystem crossing, photocatalysis, triplet photosensitizers, upconversion

Introduction

Triplet Photosensitizers (PSs) are compounds showing strong absorption of UV or visible light, efficient intersystem crossing (ISC), appropriate excited state redox potential, and long triplet-state lifetimes. These compounds are widely used for photo-driven energy transfer or electron transfer processes, which are the fundamental photophysical processes in photocatalysis, such as catalytic H2 evolution by water splitting (DiSalle and Bernhard, 2011; Gärtner et al., 2011, 2012), photocatalytic redox synthetic organic reactions (Shi and Xia, 2012; Xuan and Xiao, 2012; Hari and König, 2013), photoreduction of CO2 (Sato et al., 2013), photodynamic therapy (PDT) (Awuah and You, 2012; Kamkaew et al., 2013; Stacey and Pope, 2013; Jiang et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017), photon upconversion (triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion) (Singh-Rachford and Castellano, 2010; Ceroni, 2011; Zhao et al., 2011; Monguzzi et al., 2012; Simon and Weder, 2012; Zhou et al., 2015), photovoltaics (Guo et al., 2006; Dai et al., 2012; Bittner et al., 2014; Cheema et al., 2014; Etzold et al., 2015), and photo-initiated polymerizations (Goessl et al., 2001; Ho et al., 2010; Rivard, 2012; Cengiz et al., 2017). It is highly desired to find a chromophore to develop a series of triplet PSs to meet these requirements. Concerning this aspect, Boron dipyrromethene (Bodipy) is of particular interest due to its robust photostability and feasible derivatization (Ulrich et al., 2008; Ziessel and Harriman, 2011; Lu et al., 2014; Miao et al., 2019).

The ISC process is electron spin forbidden, and a mechanism is thus required to enhance the electron spin flipping, which requires a magnetic torque. Recently, a variety of Bodipy-based triplet PSs have been reported, and the application of these novel triplet PSs in the abovementioned areas is promising. In this review, we have summarized the recent development of the Bodipy-derived triplet PSs, ranging from the molecular structure design to the applications of these materials.

Sn → Tm ISC is a non-radiative transition, during which the electron spin flips or rephrases. A magnetic torque acting on the electron spin is therefore required. The most commonly encountered mechanisms are the spin-orbital coupling (SOC) and hyperfine interaction. For the SOC, the orbital angular momentum interacts with the spin angular momentum (also known as the magnetic angular momentum interaction), and the typical examples are the heavy atom effect, the El Syed's rule (nπ* ↔ ππ* transition), the spin orbital charge transfer, etc. Hyperfine interaction refers to the magnetic coupling between the electron and the magnetic nucleus, which is responsible for the radical pair ISC (RP ISC) in electron donor/acceptor dyads. Other ISC mechanisms do exist; for instance, the exciton coupling and singlet fission. In the following sections we have introduced the exemplars of application of Bodipy derivatives as triplet photosensitizers (Lakshmi et al., 2015). The challenge in the designing of heavy atom-free triplet photosensitizers were also introduced.

Heavy Atom Effect in Bodipy Derivatives

Nagano et al. reported that the 2,6-diiodoBodipy (Supplementary Figure 1) showed the ISC ability (Yogo et al., 2005). The ISC was confirmed with the photosensitizing of singlet oxygen (confirmed with the near IR luminescence of 1O2), and the relative efficiency of 1O2 generation is up to 6-fold of that of Rose Bengle under the same conditions. The photostability of the diiodoBodipy is better than the Rose Bengle. Intracellular phototoxicity was also confirmed. However, the triplet-state lifetime of the diiodoBodipy was not reported.

Based on the feasible derivatization of the Bodipy framework, we prepared a library of iodinated Bodipy derivatives (Figure 1); the absorption wavelength ranged from 510 to 629 nm, and the T1 state energy level of the derivatives varied from 1.5 to 1.15 eV (based on TDDFT computations) (Wu et al., 2011). The visible light absorbing of these derivatives was strong (59,400–180,000 M−1 cm−1). With nanosecond transient absorption spectra of the diiodoBodipy derivatives, the triplet-state lifetimes of the compounds were determined to be in the range of 26–66 μs. It is worth mentioning that these apparent triplet-state lifetimes were shorter than the intrinsic triplet-state lifetimes as a result of the triplet-triplet-annihilation (TTA) self-quenching effect. Later, Zhao and Dick reported a kinetic model with the TTA effect that was considered to determine the intrinsic triplet-state lifetimes, and the triplet-state lifetime of the diiodoBodipy was up to 276 μs (Lou et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019b). To the best of our knowledge, this was the first report of the intrinsic triplet-state lifetime of Bodipy derivatives.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Mono- and DiiodoBodipy derivatives showing variable absorption wavelengths and efficient ISC.

Since these diiodoBodipy derivatives showed strong absorption of visible light, an efficient ISC, and a long-lived triplet state, we used these triplet PSs for TTA upconversion (Wu et al., 2011). For instance, upon 532 nm cw-laser excitation, strong upconverted blue emission of ca. 450 nm was observed with perylene as the triplet acceptor/emitter, and the upconversion quantum yields were up to 6% (Wu et al., 2011). Other excitation wavelengths can be also used for TTA upconversion with these compounds.

In Figure 1, the methyl groups at the 1,7-position of the Bodipy core restrict the rotation of the phenyl ring at the meso-position. Without the iodination and the methyl groups at the 1,7-positions, the rotation of the phenyl ring will induce the free rotor effect, and the fluorescence of the Bodipy core is significantly quenched. A fluorescence sensor for detection of the viscosity of the microenvironment has been developed based on this property because the rotation of the phenyl ring will be inhibited in a viscous solvent (Kuimova et al., 2008). With theoretical computation, it was proposed that the quenching of the fluorescence of the Bodipy core was not due to rotation of the phenyl ring at the meso-positions, but rather that it was the bending of the Bodipy core at the excited state that quenched the fluorescence (Suhina et al., 2017).

With the initial intention to develop a viscosity-sensitive triplet photosensitizer, we studied the triplet-state property of the diiodoBodipy without methyl groups at 1,7-position (8, 9 in Figure 2). Interestingly, we found that the triplet state in 8 was not quenched, as compared to that of 9, in both aspects of triplet-state lifetimes (126 μs for 8, 241 μs for 9) and ISC quantum yields (approximated with the O.D. values of the nanosecond transient absorption) (Lou et al., 2018). The non-quenched triplet state of 8 was also confirmed with the TTA upconversion with this triplet PS (upconversion quantum yield was up to 6.3%).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

DiiodoBodipy derivatives (8, 9), which are devoid of free rotor effect on the triplet states and dibromoAzaBodipy (10a-c), showing absorption at 650–690 nm.

With theoretical computation, we found that, with torsion of the molecule at excited state, there is a crossing for S1/S0 at the energy minimum on the S1 state energy curve. For T1 state, however, there is not such crossing point for the potential energy curves (Lou et al., 2018), which can be used to rationalize the un-quenched T1 state of 8 and the quenched S1 state of the same molecule. The electron spin-forbidden feature of the T1 → S0 may also play a role in the observation of the non-quenched T1 state of 8. These results indicated the triplet-state property was different from the singlet excited state property for the same molecule.

While the normal Bodipy showed absorption in the green range (ca. 500 nm), the azaBodipy showed much red-shifted absorption in the range of 680 nm. O'shea et al. prepared dibromoazaBodipy (10 in Figure 2), and the compounds showed strong absorption in the near IR spectral region (the molar absorption coefficients were up to 80,000 M−1 cm−1) (Gorman et al., 2004; Palma et al., 2009). The fluorescence quantum yields of the dibromoazaBodipy were low (1–10%). The ISC ability of the compounds were confirmed by singlet oxygen photosensitizing, and the PDT effect was studied with cancer cells (Gorman et al., 2004). However, the triplet-state lifetimes of the compounds were not reported.

Ramaiah et al. prepared a series of iodinated analogs (Figure 3; Adarsh et al., 2012), and the absorption wavelength and the absorptivity were similar to the brominated analogs. With nanosecond transient absorption spectra, the triplet-state lifetimes of the diiodoazaBodipys were determined as ca. 2 μs, and triplet-state quantum yields were determined as 70–80% (Adarsh et al., 2012). Besides the azaBodipy derivatives, the styryl Bodipy also showed absorption in the red spectral region (Deniz et al., 2008; Lu et al., 2014). We studied the triplet-state property of the 2,6-diiodobisstyrylBodipy; the triplet-state lifetime was determined as 1.8 μs, and the singlet oxygen quantum yield was determined as 69% (Huang et al., 2013b). Notably, the triplet-state lifetime was much shorter than the normal diiodoBodipy (ca. 270 μs). We proposed that the energy gap law alone is not the reason for the short triplet-state lifetimes (Liu and Zhao, 2012; Sun et al., 2013b; Yang et al., 2016). To the best of our knowledge, this was the first time that the triplet-state property of the styryl substituted Bodipy was studied. We also used the 2,6-diiodoBodipy as a novel photocatalyst for an Aza Henry reaction (oxidative coupling of benzylamine); the reaction was more efficient than the conventional photocatalysts, such as the Ru(bpy)3 or Ir(ppy)3 (Huang et al., 2013b). We attributed the efficient photocatalysis to the strong absorption of visible light by the diiodostyrylBodipy.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Di- and tetraiodoAzaBodipy showing absorption at 650–690 nm.

The heavy atom effect for enhancing spin–orbit coupling is a common mechanism to facilitate the ISC of Bodipy compounds (Supplementary Figure 2; Wu et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012; Nakashima et al., 2018). Furthermore, Eisenberg and MaCamant studied the ISC kinetics of the 2,6-dibromoBodipy and the 2,6-diiodoBodipy (Sabatini et al., 2011). Based on the decay of the stimulated emission (SE) band, the ISC time constants of the 2,6-dibromoBodipy and the 2,6-diiodoBodipy were determined as 1.3 ns and 127 ps, respectively. This result indicated that the iodine atom was more efficient in inducing ISC. It is worth mentioning that the heavy atoms should be attached to the π-conjugation framework of the Bodipy, not to the peripheral moieties, as otherwise the heavy atom effect-induced ISC would not be efficient (Singh-Rachford et al., 2008).

Transition Metal Complexes Containing Bodipy Moieties

Transient metal complexes normally show partially forbidden S0 → 1MLCT transition; as a result, the absorption in the visible range is normally weak. Moreover, because of the significant involvement of the transition metal in the transitions, the T1 state is actually strongly quenched, manifested by its short triplet-state lifetime (Williams, 2007; Wong and Yam, 2007). Incorporation of a visible light-harvesting chromophore in the transition metal complex will have at least two possible benefits: to strengthen the visible light harvesting and to prolong the triplet-state lifetimes. The achievement of these goals, however, is dependent on the molecular structure design.

Campagna and Ziessel et al. reported Ru(II) terpyridine complexes containing a Bodipy chromophore (Figure 4; Galletta et al., 2005). A population of the Bodipy-localized triplet state (lifetimes are 8 and 30 μs, respectively) were observed for both complexes. Phosphorescence of the 3*Bodipy was observed at 77 K. However, we hypothesized that the ISC, upon excitation of the Bodipy unit, was probably not efficient due to the large distance between the Ru(II) center and the Bodipy moiety. It should be noted that the triplet-state lifetime of the parent Ru(II) (terpyridine)2 was short (250 ps), and the long triplet-state lifetimes of 13 and 14 were due to the energy transfer and the localization of triplet state on the Bodipy part. This is a typical example for manipulation of the triplet-state property of transition metal complexes with ligand modification (McClenaghan et al., 2005; Campagna et al., 2007).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Ru(II) complex containing Bodipy appendants.

Inspired by the molecular structures in the literature (Nastasi et al., 2008), we theorized that directly linking the π-conjugation framework to a metal center may greatly enhance the ISC of the chromophore as this will ensure the excitation energy harvested by the complexes will be efficiently transformed into triplet-state energy (15 in Figure 5; Wu et al., 2012a). Complex 15 was based on a N∧C∧N Pt(II)–acetylide coordination profile, which showed high phosphorescence quantum yields (19%) (Tam et al., 2011). The absorption of 15 was redshifted (absorption maximum was at 574 nm), as compared to the free Bodipy ligands (absorption band was centered at 543 nm), indicating strong electronic interaction between the Pt(II) coordination center and the Bodipy chromophore. Room temperature near IR phosphorescence band centered at 770 nm was observed, and the phosphorescence quantum yield was up to 3.5%. The triplet-state lifetime was determined as 128 μs by nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (Wu et al., 2012a). To the best of our knowledge, this was the first report of the strong near-IR phosphorescence of Bodipy at room temperature. This property indicated the efficiency of the ISC. The complex was used as a triplet photosensitizer for TTA upconversion, and upconversion of the quantum yield up to 5.2% was observed.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

N∧C∧N Pt(II)–acetylide complex and Ir(III)(ppy)(bpy) complex contains Bodipy chromophore.

Bodipy chromophores were also attached to Ir(III) coordination frameworks. Castellano and Ziessel prepared complex 16, in which the Bodipy chromophore was attached to the Ir(III) coordination center via an ethynyl linker at the meso-phenyl moiety (16 in Figure 5; Rachford et al., 2010). The complex showed a strong absorption band centered at 501 nm, and it showed the same for the Bodipy ligand, indicating limited electronic interaction between the Ir(III) coordination center and the Bodipy chromophore at the ground state. This is also supported by the redox potentials of the complex and the free ligands. Nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy showed the Bodipy-localized triplet state with a lifetime of 25 μs. The residual fluorescence of the Bodipy ligand was observed for the complex, and a phosphorescence band centered at 730 nm was observed at 77 K.

We studied the effect of π-conjugated and non-conjugated linkers on the photophysical properties of the Ir(III) complexes (17, 18 in Figure 6; Sun et al., 2013a). The molecular structure of 17 was similar to complex 16. In complex 18, however, the π-conjugated framework of the Bodipy chromophore was connected to the Ir(III) coordination center, which was different from that in 17. Although 18 showed the same absorption wavelength as compared to the free ligand, room temperature phosphorescence at 742 nm was observed (phosphorescence quantum yield: 0.03%), although with the residual fluorescence of the Bodipy unit at 553 nm (yield 0.3%). We noted the residual fluorescence of the Bodipy unit in 17 was higher (1.8%), and no phosphorescence was observed for 17. These results indicated the ISC in 18 was more efficient than 17. This conclusion was supported by the singlet oxygen photosensitizing studies; for 18, the singlet oxygen quantum yield (ΦΔ) was 97%, whereas, for 17, the ΦΔ was 52%. These results demonstrated that the structure of the linker must be taken into account in order to ensure an efficient ISC.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Ir(III)(ppy)(bpy) complex (17, 18) contains Bodipy chromophores via conjugated and non-conjugated linkers and σ-Pt-BODIPY complexes (19–23) with the Bodipy carbon directly metalated.

The triplet-state lifetimes of 17 and 18 were determined as 23.7 and 87.2 μs, respectively. We used the photosensitizer for photocatalytic oxidation of 1,5-dihydroxylnaphthalene, and results showed that the Ir(III) complexes containing the Bodipy units were much more efficient than the conventional Ir(ppy)2bpy complex. The complexes were also used as triplet photosensitizers for TTA upconversion, with perylene as the triplet acceptor/emitter. The TTA upconversion efficiency with 18 was 2.8%, whereas it was 1.2% for 17. The parent complex Ir(ppy)2bpy showed an upconversion quantum yield of 0.3%. We expect that the transition metal complexes showing strong absorption of visible light and a long-lived triplet state will be promising for applications in photocatalysis (Sun et al., 2012, 2013b; Guo et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019a).

Winter et al. directly attached the Bodipy chromophore to the Pt (19-23 in Figure 6) without the ethyne linker, and thus the ISC was supposed to be maximized for these so-called σ-Pt-BODIPY complexes (Irmler and Winter, 2016, 2018; Irmler et al., 2019a,b). The photophysical properties, as well as the electrochemical properties, are substitution position dependent. Dual emission bands centered at 588 and 797 nm were observed for the complexes, with the phosphorescence quantum yield up to 0.364%. The singlet oxygen quantum yields were ca. 50% for the complexes with metalation at the 2- or 3-positions, and it reached 95% for the complex with metalation at the 8-position (Irmler and Winter, 2018). Complexes containing both Bodipy and pyrene ligands (23) were prepared (Irmler and Winter, 2016; Irmler et al., 2019a,b), and charge separation (CS) and energy transfer were observed with the complexes. The CT phosphorescence emission band was at 724 nm, and the singlet and triplet emissions of the Bodipy-localized excited state were at 470 and 635 nm, respectively. The phosphorescence lifetimes were up to 500 μs. Interestingly, the complexes with 8-metalation show blueshifted emission as compared to the complexes with metalation at 2-positions (Leen et al., 2012). The ISC mechanism of σ-Pt-BODIPY complexes is presented in Supplementary Figure 3.

Orthogonal Bodipy Dimers: the ISC Mechanism

Previously, some Bodipy dimers were reported to show the exciton coupling effect (Supplementary Figure 4; Bröring et al., 2008; Ventura et al., 2009), which requires specific orientation of the two chromophores (Kasha et al., 1965). These compounds have been revised recently, and readers are suggested to refer those review articles (Zhao et al., 2013, 2015). The manifestation of the exciton coupling is normally a significant splitting of the absorption band of the monomer chromophore in the dimers or dyads (Bröring et al., 2008; Ventura et al., 2009). In this case, one singlet state may share similar energy levels with a triplet state, and thus the ISC will be enhanced.

Recently, orthogonal Bodipy dimers were reported (dimers 24, 25, and 26 in Figure 7; Cakmak et al., 2011). In this case, there is no splitting of the absorption band, which is different from the exciton coupling effect. The absorption maxima of the compounds are close to the absorption of the monomer. The fluorescence quantum yields of dimers 24, 25, and 26 were 3, 31, and 49%, respectively. The singlet oxygen quantum yields of the compounds were 51, 46, and 21%, respectively. Phototoxicity was confirmed with cancer cells. However, the triplet-state property, such as the triplet-state lifetimes, were not studied. Later, Akkya and Dede et al. proposed that the ISC was due to a doubly excited state mechanism (Duman et al., 2012).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Orthogonal Bodipy dimers showing efficient ISC.

We prepared an orthogonal Bodipy dimer 27, and two hetero-Bodipy dimers, 28 and 29. The aim was to extend the absorption wavelength (Figure 8; Wu et al., 2013). Dimer 27 showed one major absorption band centered at 506 nm, indicating that the two subunits in 27 were identical. For 28 and 29, however, two absorption bands centered at 509 and 541 nm were observed, which indicated that the two parts were not identical. The fluorescence quantum yields of 27, 28, and 29 were determined as 2.2, 17.6, and 2.3%, respectively (in DCM). The ΦΔ values were 64 and 42% for 27 and 28; no singlet oxygen production was observed for 29. With nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy, we determined the triplet-state lifetime of 27 and 28 as 115.6 and 140.9 μs, respectively. Note these apparent triplet-state lifetimes were shorter than the intrinsic triplet-state lifetimes as a result of TTA quenching effect. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the triplet excited state of Bodipy dimers was reported. We proposed that the heavy atom-free triplet photosensitizers were superior, and that the triplet-state lifetime was long, which made it beneficial for intermolecular electron transfer or the charge transfer processes. Thus, we used the dimers as triplet photosensitizers for TTA upconversion, and perylene was used as triplet acceptor/emitter. The upconversion quantum yield was determined as 3.7%. This example demonstrated that the heavy atom-free triplet photosensitizer based on the Bodipy dimers were applicable to intermolecular triplet energy transfers like TTA upconversion.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Orthogonal Bodipy dimer 27 and heteroBodipy dimers 28 and 29 showing efficient ISC.

The ISC mechanisms of these orthogonal Bodipy dimers are controversial. Initially, it was proposed the doubly excited state was responsible for the ISC (Duman et al., 2012). Later, it was proposed that charge transfers between the two units are involved, and that the charge recombination induced the ISC. This was based on an observation of the charge transfer state with the femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (Epelde-Elezcano et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018). It was proposed that the spin–orbital charge-transfer ISC (SOCT-ISC) was responsible for the ISC. Recently, it was proposed the ISC of these orthogonal Bodipy dimers was due to singlet fission (Montero et al., 2018). However, the time-resolved electron paramagnetic resonance (TREPR) spectroscopy study of the dimers does not support this postulation because no quartet state was observed (the spin–spin interaction was as a result of the triplet–triplet pair) (Kandrashkin et al., 2019).

Moreover, the donor/acceptor dyads with large separation distances between the electron donor and acceptor have been studied for a long time. The radical pair ISC (RP ISC) was found to be responsible for the ISC (Wiederrecht et al., 2000; Dance et al., 2006; Kc et al., 2014). However, the synthesis of these electron donor/acceptor dyads is difficult because of the rigid and long linkers in these compounds. Interestingly, some electron donor/acceptor dyads with simple molecular structures were reported recently to show ISC ability; these compounds are promising candidates for heavy atom-free triplet photosensitizers.

Harriman and Ziessel reported a Bodipy derivative with pyridium moiety at the meso position (Figure 9). For the analog containing a neutral pyridyl moiety, the fluorescence quantum yield was high (78%) and the formation of triplet state was negligible (Harriman et al., 2007).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Bodipy derivative with pyridium electron acceptor unit.

For compound 30, however, the fluorescence quantum yield decreased to 0.5%, triplet-state formation upon photoexcitation was conformed with nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy, the ISC quantum yield was determined as 75%, and the triplet-state lifetime was determined as 2.0 ± 0.5 μs. Based on picosecond transient absorption spectroscopy, the charge separation process had a time constant of 5 ps, and the charge recombination (CR)-induced ISC had a time constant of 0.7 ns (Harriman et al., 2007). The ISC should belong to the SOCT-ISC mechanism (Supplementary Figure 5) of the compact electron donor/acceptor dyads; the electron donor and acceptor should adopt orthogonal geometry, and the angular momentum conservation would thus be satisfied for the ISC (van Willigen et al., 1996; Dance et al., 2008). Energy levels of the Bodipy dimers do not support the singlet fission mechanism (excitation energy is 2.44 eV, whereas the T1 state energy of the Bodipy chromophore is ca. 1.70 eV) (Rachford et al., 2010). It should be pointed out that some Bodipy dimers do not show any ISC (Liu et al., 2018), although the so-called symmetry-breaking charge transfer (SBCT) still occurs (Whited et al., 2012).

Charge Recombination-Induced ISC in Bodipy Derivatives

Charge recombination (CR)-induced ISC in electron donor/acceptor dyads with large separation distance between the electron donor and acceptor has been studied for a long time. Radical pair ISC (RP ISC) has been found to be responsible for the ISC (Wiederrecht et al., 2000; Dance et al., 2006; Kc et al., 2014). However, the synthesis of these electron donor/acceptor dyads is difficult because of the rigid and long linkers in these compounds. Interestingly, some electron donor/acceptor dyads with simple molecular structures were reported recently to show ISC ability; these compounds are promising candidates for heavy atom-free triplet photosensitizers (Filatov et al., 2017; Hou et al., 2019).

Filatov and Senge reported feasibly prepared Bodipy–anthryl electron donor/acceptor dyads, in which the anthryl was used as an electron donor (Figure 10; Filatov et al., 2017). The fluorescence of the Bodipy moiety in the dyads was quenched to a large extent, and the CS in both dyads was confirmed with femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. The singlet oxygen quantum yields of the two dyads were determined as 67 and 38%, respectively. Among other factors, the orthogonal geometry in the dyad was beneficial for the higher singlet oxygen quantum yields. For 31, the triplet-state lifetime was determined as 41 μs with nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. The same researchers prepared a series of analog Bodipy-derived electron donor/acceptor dyads. The dyads generally showed satisfactory SOCT-ISC (Filatov et al., 2018). Zhang also prepared Bodipy-based electron donor/acceptor dyads, and the SOCT-ISC was observed (Zhang and Feng, 2017; Zhang et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2019).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Bodipy derivative with anthryl moiety as electron donor.

We prepared a series of Bodipy–anthryl dyads, in which the anthryl and the Bodipy units adopted orthogonal geometry, but the dipole moments of the two subunits were either in parallel or perpendicular (Figure 10; Wang and Zhao, 2017; Wang et al., 2019b), which was different from the previous reports of the anthryl–Bodipy dyads (Filatov et al., 2017).

We found that, although the fluorescence of the Bodipy unit was all quenched in the dyads, the singlet oxygen quantum yield varied drastically. For 33 and 34, the singlet oxygen quantum yield can be up to 90%, whereas for 35 and 36, the singlet oxygen quantum yields were much lower (at most ca. 20% Figure 11). Delayed fluorescence was observed for the dyads (P-type, i.e., TTA mechanism). We observed a long triplet-state lifetime for the dyads (up to 82 μs). These dyads were used for TTA upconversion, and an upconversion quantum yield up to 15.8% was observed (Wang and Zhao, 2017). To the best of our knowledge, this was the first time that electron donor/acceptor dyads showing SOCT-ISC and strong absorption of visible light were used for TTA upconversion.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

Bodipy derivative with anthryl moiety as electron donor and the dipole moments of the subunits are with parallel or perpendicular.

Moreover, we used TREPR spectroscopy to study the electron spin polarization (ESP) of the triplet state of the dyads. The purpose of this kind of study was to study the ISC mechanisms, e.g., to discriminate the radical pair ISC and the SOCT-ISC mechanisms. We observed an ESP of (e, e, e, a, a, a) for 33 and 34, which was similar to that of 2,6-diiodoBodipy (Wang et al., 2019b). This finding was different from the previous reports that the ESP of the triplet state accessed with SOCT-ISC should be always different from the SO ISC (Dance et al., 2008). Interestingly, 35 and 36 showed an ESP of (a, e, a, e, a, e), which was different from that of 33 and 34. The ESP ruled out the RP ISC mechanism. Interestingly, for 34, three triplet states were simultaneously observed, i.e., the 3CT state, 3An state, and 3Bodipy states. It was proposed that the CR was inhibited to some extent at low temperatures. We have proposed that it is more convincing to use the potential energy curve of the torsion to study the molecular conformation rather than the single point optimization.

We also used phenothiazine as a strong electron donor to construct SOCT-ISC dyads based on Bodipy (37 and 38, Figure 12; Chen et al., 2017). PTZ had an oxidation potential of +0.3 V (vs. Fc/Fc+), which was more negative than anthryl (ca. +1.0 V, vs. Fc/Fc+). One of the effects of using a stronger electron donor was the decreasing of the CT state energy levels, which may lead to changes of the energy level match profile between the CT state and the LE triplet state.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Open in a new tab

Bodipy derivative with phenothiazine (PTZ) moiety as electron donor.

In other words, the solvent polarity dependency of the ISC quantum yields may change for 37 and 38, as compared to that fluorescence. This was observed for the Bodipy–anthryl dyads (Filatov et al., 2017). The fluorescence of the Bodipy moiety in 37 (2.7%) was weaker than 38 (7.2%). Efficient singlet oxygen photosensitizing was observed for 37 (67% in toluene, much weaker in other solvents). The singlet oxygen photosensitizing of 38 was weaker (24.6%). Note for the Bodipy–anthryl dyads, high singlet oxygen photosensitizing was observed in acetonitrile (Wang et al., 2019b). An apparent triplet-state lifetime of 116 μs was observed with nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. We used 38 as triplet photosensitizer for TTA upconversion, and an upconversion quantum yield of 3.2% was observed.

ISC of the C60-bodipy DYADS: C60 as the Electron Spin Converter for Achieving ISC

Fullerene C60 has been widely used as an electron acceptor in organic photovoltaics materials (Yamazaki et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2011; Izawa et al., 2011; Tamura et al., 2014). It was also used in electron transfer because of its small reorganization energy (Turro et al., 2009). However, we believe one of its photophysical properties has not been fully exploited, i.e., the efficient ISC (Arbogast et al., 1991). The ISC efficiency is close to a unit; however, C60 itself is not an ideal triplet photosensitizer because the absorption in the visible spectral region is very weak. We proposed that this drawback could be addressed by attaching a visible light-harvesting chromophore to C60. The energy transfer from the organic chromophore to the C60 would thus produce the S1 state of C60, then, via the ISC of the C60 unit, the triplet state would be populated. The final localization of the triplet state would be dependent on the relative triplet energy levels of the chromophore and the C60 unit. Moreover, charge separation cannot be excluded for the C60-Bodipy dyads, especially in highly polar solvents.

Ziessel and Harriman prepared a C60-Bodipy dyad (39 in Figure 13; Ziessel et al., 2009). The fluorescence of the Bodipy unit was strongly quenched in the dyad. Based on picosecond transient absorption as well as electrochemical studies, it was found the singlet energy transfer was dominant upon photoexcitation of the C60 unit in non-polar solvents. Finally, the triplet state on the C60 unit was populated. In polar solvent benzonitrile, the CT state contained lower energy than the 3*C60 state. The CT state had a lifetime of 430 ps. In DCM, the formation of the CT state was observed; the lifetime was 160 ps, the CR lead to the formation of the 3*C60 state and not the 3*Bodipy state (Ziessel et al., 2009). The triplet-state quantum yields of the dyad were not studied. The main photophysical processes is presented in Supplementary Figure 6.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Open in a new tab

Bodipy–C60 dyad derivative with Bodipy moiety as electron donor.

D'Souza and Ng et al. prepared a PTZ–AzaBodip—C60 triad (Shi et al., 2013; Bandi et al., 2015; Collini et al., 2017). Photoexcitation of the Bodipy unit lead to the formation of PTZ+•−azaBodipy−•-C60 and PTZ+•−azaBODIPY−C60-• CT states. The CR lead to the formation of the 3*AzaBodipy state. The ISC quantum yield was not reported.

Inspired by these studies, we prepared a Bodipy–C60 dyad (Figure 14), and the photophysical property was studied (Wu et al., 2012b). The absorption wavelength of the dyads can be easily changed by using different organic chromophores; 40 showed an absorption band at 515 nm, whereas 41 showed absorption at 590 nm. Note that the S1 state energy level of C60 moiety was 1.77 eV. Thus, singlet energy transfer from the Bodipy unit to the C60 unit is possible, although this is not a typical scenario for Förest resonance energy transfer (FRET), since the S0 → S1 transition of the C60 unit is very weak (Lakowicz, 1999).

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Open in a new tab

Bodipy–C60 dyads 40 and 41 as triplet photosensitizers.

The fluorescence of the Bodipy units in the dyads was strongly quenched, indicating either singlet energy transfer or electron transfer from the Bodipy units to the C60 unit. With nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy, an excited state absorption band centered at 720 nm was observed, which was the characteristic absorption of the 3C60* state. The triplet-state lifetime was determined as 33.3 μs (Wu et al., 2012b). Since the dyads showed strong absorption in the visible spectral region and long-lived triplet excited states, we used the dyads for TTA upconversion. The upconversion quantum yields were up to 2.9% (40) and 7.0% (41). We determined the singlet oxygen quantum yield of an analog of 40 as 81%, thus indicating the ISC of the C60-Bodipy dyads was efficient (Huang et al., 2013a). To the best of our knowledge, this was the first application of C60-organic chromophore dyads for TTA upconversion. Following this line, we prepared a C60-Bodipy–styrylBodipy triad, which showed broadband absorption in the visible spectral region, to enhance the photocatalytic efficiency with a white light source (Huang et al., 2013a). We also prepared C60-dyads containing the chromophore of perylenebisimide (Liu and Zhao, 2012), styrylBodipy (Huang et al., 2012b), and ethyne-linked Bodipy (Huang et al., 2012a; Yang et al., 2012); an efficient ISC was observed for the dyads. We proposed that these C60-organic chromophore dyads that showed strong absorption of visible light and a long-lived triplet state are promising triplet photosensitizers for PDT, photocatalysis, and photon upconversion.

Radical Enhanced ISC

It has been known that the fluorescence of organic chromophores can be quenched by stable radicals (Likhtenstein et al., 2007; Li et al., 2010; Yapici et al., 2012). With TREPR spectroscopy, it was shown that there existed a spin–spin interaction between the persistent radical and the chromophore (Corvaja et al., 1995; Ishii et al., 1996, 1999, 2001; Likhtenstein et al., 2007; Dyar et al., 2015). The overall spin of the dyad may facilitate the ISC of the chromophore (Dyar et al., 2015). However, this property was rarely used for designing visible light-harvesting triplet photosensitizers. One critical issue was to fine-tune the spin–spin interaction magnitude between the radical and the chromophore in order to attain efficient ISC and a long-lived triplet state at the same time. Strong spin–spin interactions will quench the triplet state of the chromophore (Dyar et al., 2015).

We prepared two Bodipy–TEMPO dyads (Figure 15), which contain different linkers (Wang et al., 2017). The purpose of varying the linker was to tune the electron spin–spin interaction in the dyads to achieve the goal to have efficient ISC and also a long-lived triplet state. The results showed that the fluorescence of the Bodipy unit was quenched in the dyads; the fluorescence quantum yield of 42 was 29%, and the fluorescence of 43 was 5%. With nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy, we confirmed the ISC and the formation of the 3*Bodipy state upon photoexcitation. The triplet-state lifetimes of the dyads were 190 and 62 μs, respectively. The singlet oxygen quantum yields of the dyads were determined as 14 and 56% for 42 and 43, respectively. These results show that the linker length in 43 is optimal to achieve both efficient ISC and a long-lived triplet state. With TREPR spectroscopy, we observed the quartet state in a frozen solution at 80 K, indicating that the spin–spin interaction between the radical and the chromophore. In a fluid solution at 185 K, we observed the electron spin polarization of the TEMPO changed from absorption to emission with a longer delay time after the laser flash. The initial absorptive signal was due to the radical-triplet pair mechanism having a doublet precursor, and the later emissive signal was due to RTPM having a triplet precursor. The Bodipy–TEMPO dyads were used for TTA upconversion, and the upconversion quantum yield for 43 was 6.7%, but it was much lower for 42 (0.2%). The radical enhanced ISC mechanism is presented in Supplementary Figure 7.

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Open in a new tab

Bodipy-TEMPO dyads showing radical enhanced ISC.

Conclusion

In summary, in recent years, varieties of Bodipy derivatives have been reported as having an intersystem crossing (ISC) ability, and the applications of these compounds in photocatalysis, photodynamic therapy, and photon upconversion are promising. One of the critical photophysical properties of the triplet photosensitizers is the efficient ISC ability. In this review article, we summarized the recent development in the area of Bodipy-derived triplet photosensitizers. The compounds have been introduced based on their ISC mechanisms, which include the heavy atom effect, exciton coupling, charge recombination induced ISC, using a spin converter, and radical enhanced ISC. Some transition metal complexes containing Bodipy chromophores are also introduced. The designing rationales of the molecular structures are discussed. We believe the research on the designing of new triplet photosensitizers and the application of these novel materials in the abovementioned areas will flourish.

Author Contributions

JZ conceived the topic of the review article and wrote most of the draft. QL took part in the writing and the discussion. KC, YD, XZ, MI, and GT wrote sections of the review and prepared the figures. All the authors made comments and suggestions for the writing of the review.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the NSFC (21673031, 21761142005, 21911530095, and 21421005) and the State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals (ZYTS201901) for financial support.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2019.00821/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (2.2MB, docx)

References

  1. Adarsh N., Shanmugasundaram M., Avirah R. R., Ramaiah D. (2012). Aza-BODIPY derivatives: enhanced quantum yields of triplet excited states and the generation of singlet oxygen and their role as facile sustainable photooxygenation catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 12655–12662. 10.1002/chem.201202438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arbogast J. W., Darmanyan A. P., Foote C. S., Diederich F. N., Whetten R. L., Rubin Y., et al. (1991). Photophysical properties of sixty atom carbon molecule (C60). J. Phys. Chem. 95, 11–12. 10.1021/j100154a006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Awuah S. G., You Y. (2012). Boron dipyrromethene (BODIPY)-based photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. RSC Adv. 2, 11169–11183. 10.1039/c2ra21404k [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandi V., Gobeze H. B., Lakshmi V., Ravikanth M., D'Souza F. (2015). Vectorial charge separation and selective triplet-state formation during charge recombination in a pyrrolyl-bridged BODIPY–fullerene dyad. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 8095–8102. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02712 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bittner E. R., Lankevich V., Gélinas S., Rao A., Ginger D. A., Friend R. H. (2014). How disorder controls the kinetics of triplet charge recombination in semiconducting organic polymer photovoltaics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 20321–20328. 10.1039/C4CP01776E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bröring M., Krüger R., Link S., Kleeberg C., Köhler S., Xie X., et al. (2008). Bis(BF2)-2,2′-bidipyrrins (bisBODIPYs): highly fluorescent BODIPY dimers with large stokes shifts. Chem. Eur. J. 14, 2976–2983. 10.1002/chem.200701912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cakmak Y., Kolemen S., Duman S., Dede Y., Dolen Y., Kilic B., et al. (2011). Designing excited states: theory-guided access to efficient photosensitizers for photodynamic action. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 11937–11941. 10.1002/anie.201105736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Campagna S., Puntoriero F., Nastasi F., Bergamini G., Balzani V. (2007). Photochemistry and photophysics of coordination compounds: ruthenium, in Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds I, eds Balzani V., Campagna S. (Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; ), 117–214. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cengiz N., Gevrek T. N., Sanyal R., Sanyal A. (2017). Orthogonal thiol–ene ‘click' reactions: a powerful combination for fabrication and functionalization of patterned hydrogels. Chem. Commun. 53, 8894–8897. 10.1039/C7CC02298K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ceroni P. (2011). Energy up-conversion by low-power excitation: new applications of an old concept. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 9560–9564. 10.1002/chem.201101102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheema H., Islam A., Han L., Gautam B., Younts R., Gundogdu K., et al. (2014). Influence of mono versus bis-electron-donor ancillary ligands in heteroleptic Ru(II) bipyridyl complexes on electron injection from the first excited singlet and triplet states in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 14228–14235. 10.1039/C4TA01942C [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen K., Yang W., Wang Z., Iagatti A., Bussotti L., Foggi P., et al. (2017). Triplet excited state of BODIPY accessed by charge recombination and its application in triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion. J. Phys. Chem. A. 121, 7550–7564. 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b07623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen T. L., Zhang Y., Smith P., Tamayo A., Liu Y., Ma B. (2011). Diketopyrrolopyrrole-containing oligothiophene-fullerene triads and their use in organic solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 3, 2275–2280. 10.1021/am200145t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen Y., Zhao J., Xie L., Guo H., Li Q. (2012). Thienyl-substituted bodipys with strong visible light-absorption and long-lived triplet excited states as organic triplet sensitizers for triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion. RSC Adv. 2, 3942–3953. 10.1039/c2ra01064j [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Collini M. A., Thomas M. B., Bandi V., Karr P. A., D'Souza F. (2017). Directly attached bisdonor-BF2 chelated azadipyrromethene-fullerene tetrads for promoting ground and excited state charge transfer. Chem. Eur. J. 23, 4450–4461. 10.1002/chem.201700200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Corvaja C., Maggini M., Prato M., Scorrano G., Venzin M. (1995). C60 derivative covalently linked to a nitroxide radical: time-resolved EPR evidence of electron spin polarization by intramolecular radical-triplet pair interaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 8857–8858. 10.1021/ja00139a022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dai F. R., Zhan H. M., Liu Q., Fu Y. Y., Li J. H., Wang Q. W., et al. (2012). Platinum(II)–bis(aryleneethynylene) complexes for solution-processible molecular bulk heterojunction solar cells. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 1502–1511. 10.1002/chem.201102598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dance Z. E., Mi Q., McCamant D. W., Ahrens M. J., Ratner M. A., Wasielewski M. R. (2006). Time-resolved EPR studies of photogenerated radical ion pairs separated by p-phenylene oligomers and of triplet states resulting from charge recombination. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 25163–25173. 10.1021/jp063690n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dance Z. E. X., Mickley S. M., Wilson T. M., Ricks A. B., Scott A. M., Ratner M. A., et al. (2008). Intersystem crossing mediated by photoinduced intramolecular charge transfer: julolidine–anthracene molecules with perpendicular π systems. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 4194–4201. 10.1021/jp800561g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Deniz E., Isbasar G. C., Bozdemir O. A., Yildirim L. T., Siemiarczuk A., Akkaya E. U. (2008). Bidirectional switching of near IR emitting boradiazaindacene fluorophores. Org. Lett. 10, 3401–3403. 10.1021/ol801062h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. DiSalle B. F., Bernhard S. (2011). Orchestrated photocatalytic water reduction using surface-adsorbing iridium photosensitizers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11819–11821. 10.1021/ja201514e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Duman S., Cakmak Y., Kolemen S., Akkaya E. U., Dede Y. (2012). Heavy atom free singlet oxygen generation: doubly substituted configurations dominate S1 states of bis-BODIPYs. J. Org. Chem. 77, 4516–4527. 10.1021/jo300051v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dyar S. M., Margulies E. A., Horwitz N. E., Brown K. E., Krzyaniak M. D., Wasielewski M. R. (2015). Photogenerated quartet state formation in a compact ring-fused perylene-nitroxide. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 13560–13569. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b02378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Epelde-Elezcano N., Palao E., Manzano H., Prieto-Castañeda A., Agarrabeitia A. R., Tabero A., et al. (2017). Rational design of advanced photosensitizers based on orthogonal BODIPY dimers to finely modulate singlet oxygen generation. Chem. Eur. J. 23, 4837–4848. 10.1002/chem.201605822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Etzold F., Howard I. A., Forler N., Melnyk A., Andrienko D., Hansen M. R., et al. (2015). Sub-ns triplet state formation by non-geminate recombination in PSBTBT:PC70BM and PCPDTBT:PC60BM organic solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1511–1522. 10.1039/C4EE03630A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Filatov M. A., Karuthedath S., Polestshuk P. M., Callaghan S., Flanagan K. J., Telitchko M., et al. (2018). Control of triplet state generation in heavy atom-free BODIPY–anthracene dyads by media polarity and structural factors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 8016–8031. 10.1039/C7CP08472B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Filatov M. A., Karuthedath S., Polestshuk P. M., Savoie H., Flanagan K. J., Sy C., et al. (2017). Generation of triplet excited states via photoinduced electron transfer in meso-anthra-BODIPY: fluorogenic response toward singlet oxygen in solution and in vitro. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6282–6285. 10.1021/jacs.7b00551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Galletta M., Campagna S., Quesada M., Ulrich G., Ziessel R. (2005). The elusive phosphorescence of pyrromethene–BF2 dyes revealed in new multicomponent species containing Ru(II)–terpyridine subunits. Chem. Commun. 4224. 10.1039/b507196h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gärtner F., Cozzula D., Losse S., Boddien A., Anilkumar G., Junge H., et al. (2011). Synthesis, characterisation and application of iridium(III) photosensitisers for catalytic water reduction. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 6998–7006. 10.1002/chem.201100235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gärtner F., Denurra S., Losse S., Neubauer A., Boddien A., Gopinathan A., et al. (2012). Synthesis and characterization of new iridium photosensitizers for catalytic hydrogen generation from water. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 3220–3225. 10.1002/chem.201103670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Goessl A., Bowen-Pope D. F., Hoffman A. S. (2001). Control of shape and size of vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro by plasma lithography. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 57, 15–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gorman A., Killoran J., O'Shea C., Kenna T., Gallagher W. M., O'Shea D. F. (2004). In vitro demonstration of the heavy-atom effect for photodynamic therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10619–10631. 10.1021/ja047649e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Guo F., Kim Y. G., Reynolds J. R., Schanze K. S. (2006). Platinum–acetylide polymer based solar cells: involvement of the triplet state for energy conversion. Chem. Commun. 1887–1889. 10.1039/B516086C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guo S., Chen K., Dong R., Zhang Z., Zhao J., Lu T. (2018). Robust and long-lived excited state Ru(II) polyimine photosensitizers boost hydrogen production. ACS Catalysis 8, 8659–8670. 10.1021/acscatal.8b02226 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hari D. P., König B. (2013). The photocatalyzed meerwein arylation: classic reaction of aryl diazonium salts in a new light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 4734–4743. 10.1002/anie.201210276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Harriman A., Mallon L. J., Ulrich G., Ziessel R. (2007). Rapid intersystem crossing in closely-spaced but orthogonal molecular dyads. ChemPhysChem 8, 1207–1214. 10.1002/cphc.200700060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ho K. M., Li W. Y., Wong C. H., Li P. (2010). Amphiphilic polymeric particles with core–shell nanostructures: emulsion-based syntheses and potential applications. Colloid Polym. Sci. 288, 1503–1523. 10.1007/s00396-010-2276-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hou Y., Zhang X., Chen K., Liu D., Wang Z., Liu Q., et al. (2019). Charge separation, charge recombination, long-lived charge transfer state formation and intersystem crossing in organic electron donor/acceptor dyads. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 12048–12074. 10.1039/C9TC04285G [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hu W., Liu M., Zhang X., Wang Y., Wang Y., Lan H., et al. (2019). Can BODIPY-electron acceptor conjugates act as heavy atom-free excited triplet state and singlet oxygen photosensitizers via photoinduced charge separation-charge recombination mechanism? J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 15944–15955. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02961 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang D., Zhao J., Wu W., Yi X., Yang P., Ma J. (2012a). Visible-light-harvesting triphenylamine ethynyl C60-BODIPY dyads as heavy-atom-free organic triplet photosensitizers for triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion. Asian J. Org. Chem. 1, 264–273. 10.1002/ajoc.201200062 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Huang L., Cui X., Therrien B., Zhao J. (2013a). Energy-funneling-based broadband visible-light-absorbing bodipy–C60 triads and tetrads as dual functional heavy-atom-free organic triplet photosensitizers for photocatalytic organic reactions. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 17472–17482. 10.1002/chem.201302492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Huang L., Yu X., Wu W., Zhao J. (2012b). Styryl bodipy-C60 dyads as efficient heavy-atom-free organic triplet photosensitizers. Org. Lett. 14, 2594–2597. 10.1021/ol3008843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Huang L., Zhao J., Guo S., Zhang C., Ma J. (2013b). Bodipy derivatives as organic triplet photosensitizers for aerobic photoorganocatalytic oxidative coupling of amines and photooxidation of dihydroxylnaphthalenes. J. Org. Chem. 78, 5627–5637. 10.1021/jo400769u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Irmler P., Gogesch F. S., Larsen C. B., Wenger O. S., Winter R. F. (2019a). Four different emissions from a Pt(Bodipy)(PEt3)2(S-Pyrene) dyad. Dalton Trans. 48, 1171–1174. 10.1039/C8DT04823A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Irmler P., Gogesch F. S., Mang A., Bodensteiner M., Larsen C. B., Wenger O. S., et al. (2019b). Directing energy transfer in Pt(bodipy)(mercaptopyrene) dyads. Dalton Trans. 48, 11690–11705. 10.1039/C9DT01737B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Irmler P., Winter R. F. (2016). Complexes trans-Pt(BODIPY)X(PEt3)2: excitation energy-dependent fluorescence and phosphorescence emissions, oxygen sensing and photocatalysis. Dalton Trans. 45, 10420–10434. 10.1039/C6DT01623E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Irmler P., Winter R. F. (2018). σ-Pt-BODIPY complexes with platinum attachment to carbon atoms C2 or C3: spectroscopic, structural, and (spectro)electrochemical studies and photocatalysis. Organometallics 37, 235–253. 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00806 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ishii K., Fujisawa J., Ohba Y., Yamauchi S. (1996). A time-resolved electron paramagnetic resonance study on the excited states of tetraphenylporphinatozinc(II) coordinated by p-pyridyl nitronyl nitroxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 13079–13080. 10.1021/ja961661s [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ishii K., Hirose Y., Fujitsuka H., Ito O., Kobayashi N. (2001). Time-resolved EPR, fluorescence, and transient absorption studies on phthalocyaninatosilicon covalently linked to one or two TEMPO radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 702–708. 10.1021/ja002780h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ishii K., Hirose Y., Kobayashi N. (1999). Electron spin polarizations of phthalocyaninatosilicon covalently linked to one TEMPO radical in the excited quartet and doublet ground states. J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 1986–1990. 10.1021/jp983624o [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Izawa S., Hashimoto K., Tajima K. (2011). Efficient charge generation and collection in organic solar cells based on low band gap dyad molecules. Chem. Commun. 47, 6365–6367. 10.1039/c1cc11387a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jiang X. J., Lau J. T., Wang Q., Ng D. K., Lo P. C. (2016). pH- and thiol-responsive BODIPY-based photosensitizers for targeted photodynamic therapy. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 8273–8281. 10.1002/chem.201600452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kamkaew A., Lim S. H., Lee H. B., Kiew L. V., Chung L. Y., Burgess K. (2013). BODIPY dyes in photodynamic therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 77–88. 10.1039/C2CS35216H [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kandrashkin Y. E., Wang Z., Sukhanov A. A., Hou Y., Zhang X., Liu Y., et al. (2019). Balance between triplet states in photoexcited orthogonal bodipy dimers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 4157–4163. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kasha M., Rawls H. R., Ashraf El-Bayoumi M. (1965). The exciton model in molecular spectroscopy. Pure Appl. Chem. 11, 371–392. 10.1351/pac196511030371 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kc C. B., Lim G. N., Nesterov V. N., Karr P. A., D'Souza F. (2014). Phenothiazine–BODIPY–fullerene triads as photosynthetic reaction center models: substitution and solvent polarity effects on photoinduced charge separation and recombination. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 17100–17112. 10.1002/chem.201404863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kuimova M. K., Yahioglu G., Levitt J. A., Suhling K. (2008). Molecular rotor measures viscosity of live cells via fluorescence lifetime imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6672–6673. 10.1021/ja800570d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lakowicz J. R. (1999). Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lakshmi V., Rao M. R., Ravikanth M. (2015). Halogenated boron-dipyrromethenes: synthesis, properties and applications. Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 2501–2517. 10.1039/C4OB02293A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Leen V., Yuan P., Wang L., Boens N., Dehaen W. (2012). Synthesis of meso-halogenated BODIPYs and access to meso-substituted analogues. Org. Lett. 14, 6150–6153. 10.1021/ol3028225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Li P., Xie T., Duan X., Yu F., Wang X., Tang B. (2010). A new highly selective and sensitive assay for fluorescence imaging of ·OH in living cells: effectively avoiding the interference of peroxynitrite. Chem. Eur. J. 16, 1834–1840. 10.1002/chem.200901514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Li X., Kolemen S., Yoon J., Akkaya E. U. (2017). Activatable photosensitizers: agents for selective photodynamic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27:1604053 10.1002/adfm.201604053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Likhtenstein G. I., Ishii K., Nakatsuji S. (2007). Dual chromophore-nitroxides: novel molecular probes, photochemical and photophysical models and magnetic materials. Photochem. Photobiol. 83, 871–881. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2007.00141.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Liu Y., Zhao J. (2012). Visible light-harvesting perylenebisimide–fullerene (C60) dyads with bidirectional “ping-pong” energy transfer as triplet photosensitizers for photooxidation of 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene. Chem. Commun. 48, 3751–3753. 10.1039/c2cc30345k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Liu Y., Zhao J., Iagatti A., Bussotti L., Foggi P., Castellucci E., et al. (2018). A revisit to the orthogonal bodipy dimers: experimental evidence for the symmetry breaking charge transfer-induced intersystem crossing. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 2502–2511. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10213 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lou Z., Hou Y., Chen K., Zhao J., Ji S., Zhong F., et al. (2018). Different quenching effect of intramolecular rotation on the singlet and triplet excited states of Bodipy. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 185–193. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10466 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lu H., Mack J., Yang Y., Shen Z. (2014). Structural modification strategies for the rational design of Red/NIR region BODIPYs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 4778–4823. 10.1039/C4CS00030G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. McClenaghan N. D., Leydet Y., Maubert B., Indelli M. T., Campagna S. (2005). Excited-state equilibration: a process leading to long-lived metal-to-ligand charge transfer luminescence in supramolecular systems. Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 1336–1350. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.12.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Miao W., Feng Y., Wu Q., Sheng W., Li M., Liu Q., et al. (2019). Phenanthro[b]-fused bodipys through tandem suzuki and oxidative aromatic couplings: synthesis and photophysical properties. J. Org. Chem. 84, 9693–9704. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Monguzzi A., Tubino R., Hoseinkhani S., Campione M., Meinardi F. (2012). Low power, non-coherent sensitized photon up-conversion: modeling and perspectives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 4322–4332. 10.1039/c2cp23900k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Montero R., Martínez-Martínez V., Longarte A., Epelde-Elezcano N., Palao E., Lamas I., et al. (2018). Singlet fission mediated photophysics of bodipy dimers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 641–646. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nakashima M., Iizuka K., Karasawa M., Ishii K., Kubo Y. (2018). Selenium-containing bodipy dyes as photosensitizers for triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion. J. Mater. Chem. C 6, 6208–6215. 10.1039/C8TC00944A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nastasi F., Puntoriero F., Campagna S., Diring S., Ziessel R. (2008). Photoinduced intercomponent processes in multichromophoric species made of Pt(II)-terpyridine-acetylide and dipyrromethene-BF2 subunits. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 3982–3986. 10.1039/b805972a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Palma A., Tasior M., Frimannsson D. O., Vu T. T., Méallet-Renault R., O'Shea D. F. (2009). New on-bead near-infrared fluorophores and fluorescent sensor constructs. Org. Lett. 11, 3638–3641. 10.1021/ol901413u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rachford A. A., Ziessel R., Bura T., Retailleau P., Castellano F. N. (2010). Boron dipyrromethene (Bodipy) phosphorescence revealed in [Ir(ppy)2(bpy-C=C-Bodipy)]+. Inorg. Chem. 49, 3730–3736. 10.1021/ic901996u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rivard E. (2012). Inorganic and organometallic polymers. Annu. Rep. Sect. A Inorgan. Chem. 108, 315–329. 10.1039/c2ic90001g [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sabatini R. P., McCormick T. M., Lazarides T., Wilson K. C., Eisenberg R., McCamant D. W. (2011). Intersystem crossing in halogenated Bodipy chromophores used for solar hydrogen production. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 223–227. 10.1021/jz101697y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sato S., Morikawa T., Kajino T., Ishitani O. (2013). A highly efficient mononuclear iridium complex photocatalyst for CO2 reduction under visible light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 988–992. 10.1002/anie.201206137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Shi L., Xia W. (2012). Photoredox functionalization of C–H bonds adjacent to a nitrogen atom. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7687–7697. 10.1039/c2cs35203f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Shi W. J., El-Khouly M. E., Ohkubo K., Fukuzumi S., Ng D. K. (2013). Photosynthetic antenna-reaction center mimicry with a covalently linked monostyryl boron-dipyrromethene–aza-boron-dipyrromethene–C60 triad. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 11332–11341. 10.1002/chem.201300318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Simon Y. C., Weder C. (2012). Low-power photon upconversion through triplet–triplet annihilation in polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 20817–20830. 10.1039/c2jm33654e [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Singh-Rachford T. N., Castellano F. N. (2010). Photon upconversion based on sensitized triplet–triplet annihilation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 2560–2573. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.01.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Singh-Rachford T. N., Haefele A., Ziessel R., Castellano F. N. (2008). Boron dipyrromethene chromophores: next generation triplet acceptors/annihilators for low power upconversion schemes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 16164–16165. 10.1021/ja807056a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Stacey O. J., Pope S. J. A. (2013). New avenues in the design and potential application of metal complexes for photodynamic therapy. RSC Adv. 3, 25550–25564. 10.1039/c3ra45219k [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Suhina T., Amirjalayer S., Woutersen S., Bonn D., Brouwer A. M. (2017). Ultrafast dynamics and solvent-dependent deactivation kinetics of BODIPY molecular rotors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 19998–20007. 10.1039/C7CP02037F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Sun J., Zhao J., Guo H., Wu W. (2012). Visible-light harvesting iridium complexes as singlet oxygen sensitizers for photooxidation of 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene. Chem. Commun. 48, 4169–4171. 10.1039/c2cc16690a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sun J., Zhong F., Yi X., Zhao J. (2013a). Efficient enhancement of the visible-light absorption of cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes triplet photosensitizers with Bodipy and applications in photooxidation and triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion. Inorg. Chem. 52, 6299–6310. 10.1021/ic302210b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sun J., Zhong F., Zhao J. (2013b). Observation of the long-lived triplet excited state of perylenebisimide (PBI) in C∧N cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes and application in photocatalytic oxidation. Dalton Trans. 42, 9595–9605. 10.1039/c3dt33036b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Tam A. Y., Tsang D. P., Chan M. Y., Zhu N., Yam V. W. (2011). A luminescent cyclometalated platinum(II) complex and its green organic light emitting device with high device performance. Chem. Commun. 47, 3383–3385. 10.1039/c0cc05538g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Tamura Y., Saeki H., Hashizume J., Okazaki Y., Kuzuhara D., Suzuki M., et al. (2014). Direct comparison of a covalently-linked dyad and a 1:1 mixture of tetrabenzoporphyrin and fullerene as organic photovoltaic materials. Chem. Commun. 50, 10379–10381. 10.1039/C4CC03801K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Turro N. J., Ramamurthy V., Scaiano J. C. (2009). Principles of Molecular Photochemistry: An Introduction. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ulrich G., Ziessel R., Harriman A. (2008). The chemistry of fluorescent bodipy dyes: versatility unsurpassed. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 1184–1201. 10.1002/anie.200702070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. van Willigen H., Jones G., Farahat M. S. (1996). Time-resolved EPR study of photoexcited triplet-state formation in electron-donor-substituted acridinium ions. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 3312–3316. 10.1021/jp953176+ [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Ventura B., Marconi G., Bröring M., Krüger R., Flamigni L. (2009). Bis(BF2)-2,2′-bidipyrrins, a class of BODIPY dyes with new spectroscopic and photophysical properties. New J. Chem. 33, 428–438. 10.1039/B813638F [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wang P., Guo S., Wang H., Chen K., Zhang N., Zhang Z., et al. (2019a). A broadband and strong visible-light-absorbing photosensitizer boosts hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun. 10:3155. 10.1038/s41467-019-11099-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wang Z., Sukhanov A. A., Toffoletti A., Sadiq F., Zhao J., Barbon A., et al. (2019b). Insights into the efficient intersystem crossing of Bodipy-anthracene compact dyads with steady-state and time-resolved optical/magnetic spectroscopies and observation of the delayed fluorescence. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 265–274. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10835 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wang Z., Zhao J. (2017). Bodipy–anthracene dyads as triplet photosensitizers: effect of chromophore orientation on triplet-state formation efficiency and application in triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion. Org. Lett. 19, 4492–4495. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang Z., Zhao J., Barbon A., Toffoletti A., Liu Y., An Y., et al. (2017). Radical-enhanced intersystem crossing in new bodipy derivatives and application for efficient triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 7831–7842. 10.1021/jacs.7b02063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Whited M. T., Patel N. M., Roberts S. T., Allen K., Djurovich P. I., Bradforth S. E., et al. (2012). Symmetry-breaking intramolecular charge transfer in the excited state of meso-linked BODIPY dyads. Chem. Commun. 48, 284–286. 10.1039/C1CC12260F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wiederrecht G. P., Svec W. A., Wasielewski M. R., Galili T., Levanon H. (2000). Novel mechanism for triplet state formation in short distance covalently linked radical ion pairs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 9715–9722. 10.1021/ja000662o [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Williams J. A. G. (2007). Photochemistry and photophysics of coordination compounds: platinum, in Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds II, eds Balzani V., Campagna S. (Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; ), 205–268. [Google Scholar]
  102. Wong K. M. C., Yam V. W. W. (2007). Luminescence platinum(II) terpyridyl complexes—from fundamental studies to sensory functions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 251, 2477–2488. 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.02.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wu W., Cui X., Zhao J. (2013). Hetero Bodipy-dimers as heavy atom-free triplet photosensitizers showing a long-lived triplet excited state for triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion. Chem. Commun. 49, 9009–9011. 10.1039/c3cc45470c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Wu W., Guo H., Wu W., Ji S., Zhao J. (2011). Organic triplet sensitizer library derived from a single chromophore (BODIPY) with long-lived triplet excited state for triplet-triplet annihilation based upconversion. J. Org. Chem. 76, 7056–7064. 10.1021/jo200990y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Wu W., Zhao J., Guo H., Sun J., Ji S., Wang Z. (2012a). Long-lived room-temperature near-IR phosphorescence of bodipy in a visible-light-harvesting N∧C∧N PtII-acetylide complex with a directly metalated BODIPY chromophore. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 1961–1968. 10.1002/chem.201102634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Wu W., Zhao J., Sun J., Guo S. (2012b). Light-harvesting fullerene dyads as organic triplet photosensitizers for triplet-triplet annihilation upconversions. J. Org. Chem. 77, 5305–5312. 10.1021/jo300613g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Xuan J., Xiao W. (2012). Visible-light photoredox catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 6828–6838. 10.1002/anie.201200223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Yamazaki T., Murata Y., Komatsu K., Furukawa K., Morita M., Maruyama N., et al. (2004). Synthesis and electrolytic polymerization of the ethylenedioxy-substituted terthiophene-fullerene dyad. Org. Lett. 6, 4865–4868. 10.1021/ol048081h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Yang P., Wu W., Zhao J., Huang D., Yi X. (2012). Using C60-bodipy dyads that show strong absorption of visible light and long-lived triplet excited states as organic triplet photosensitizers for triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 20273–20283. 10.1039/c2jm34353c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Yang W., Zhao J., Sonn C., Escudero D., Karatay A., Yaglioglu H. G., et al. (2016). Efficient intersystem crossing in heavy-atom-free perylenebisimide derivatives. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 10162–10175. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01584 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Yapici N. B., Jockusch S., Moscatelli A., Mandalapu S. R., Itagaki Y., Bates D. K., et al. (2012). New rhodamine nitroxide based fluorescent probes for intracellular hydroxyl radical identification in living cells. Org. Lett. 14, 50–53. 10.1021/ol202816m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Yogo T., Urano Y., Ishitsuka Y., Maniwa F., Nagano T. (2005). Highly efficient and photostable photosensitizer based on BODIPY chromophore. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 12162–12163. 10.1021/ja0528533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhang X. F., Feng N. (2017). Photoinduced electron transfer-based halogen-free photosensitizers: covalent meso-aryl (phenyl, naphthyl, anthryl, and pyrenyl) as electron donors to effectively induce the formation of the excited triplet state and singlet oxygen for BODIPY compounds. Chem. Asian J. 12, 2447–2456. 10.1002/asia.201700794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Zhang X. F., Yang X., Xu B. (2017). PET-based bisBODIPY photosensitizers for highly efficient excited triplet state and singlet oxygen generation: tuning photosensitizing ability by dihedral angles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 24792–24804. 10.1039/C7CP02645E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Zhao J., Ji S., Guo H. (2011). Triplet–triplet annihilation based upconversion: from triplet sensitizers and triplet acceptors to upconversion quantum yields. RSC Adv. 1, 937–950. 10.1039/c1ra00469g [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Zhao J., Wu W., Sun J., Guo S. (2013). Triplet photosensitizers: from molecular design to applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 5323–5351. 10.1039/c3cs35531d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Zhao J., Xu K., Yang W., Wang Z., Zhong F. (2015). The triplet excited state of Bodipy: formation, modulation and application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 8904–8939. 10.1039/C5CS00364D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Zhou J., Liu Q., Feng W., Sun Y., Li F. (2015). Upconversion luminescent materials: advances and applications. Chem. Rev. 115, 395–465. 10.1021/cr400478f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Ziessel R., Allen B. D., Rewinska D. B., Harriman A. (2009). Selective triplet-state formation during charge recombination in a fullerene/Bodipy molecular dyad (Bodipy = borondipyrromethene). Chem. Eur. J. 15, 7382–7393. 10.1002/chem.200900440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Ziessel R., Harriman A. (2011). Artificial light-harvesting antennae: electronic energy transfer by way of molecular funnels. Chem. Commun. 47, 611–631. 10.1039/C0CC02687E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (2.2MB, docx)

Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES