Abstract
Despite the decline in mortality rates over the last 20 years, cancer remains one of the leading causes of death in children worldwide. Early recognition and treatment for acute oncological emergencies are vital in preventing mortality and poor outcomes, such as irreversible end-organ damage and a compromised quality of life.
Imaging plays a pivotal and adjunctive role to clinical examination, and a high level of interpretative acumen by the radiologist can make the difference between life and death. In contrast to adults, the most accessible cross-sectional imaging tool in children typically involves ultrasound. The excellent soft tissue differentiation allows for careful delineation of malignant masses and along with colour Doppler imaging, thromboses and large haematomas can be easily identified. Neurological imaging, particularly in older children is an exception. Here, computed tomography (CT) is required for acute intracranial pathologies, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) providing more definitive results later.
This review is divided into a ‘body systems’ format covering a range of pathologies including neurological complications (brainstem herniation, hydrocephalus, spinal cord compression), thoracic complications (airway obstruction, superior vena cava syndrome, cardiac tamponade), intra-abdominal complications (bowel obstruction and perforation, hydronephrosis, abdominal compartment syndrome) and haematological-related emergencies (thrombosis, infection, massive haemorrhage). Within each subsection, we highlight pertinent clinical and imaging considerations.
The overall objective of this pictorial review is to illustrate how primary childhood malignancies may present with life-threatening complications, and emphasise the need for imminent patient management.
Keywords: Emergency, Neoplasms, Child, Radiology, Tumour
Key points
Paediatric cancers differ from adult malignancies in their type, prevalence and location and therefore knowledge of tumour behaviours is crucial in predicting acute complications.
Conventional radiography can be helpful in suspected bowel perforation, bowel obstruction or airway obstruction from mediastinal masses; however, ultrasound and CT are frequently more informative.
MR imaging, whilst excellent for characterising and staging a primary malignancy, has less of a role in the emergency scenario apart from in neurological emergencies, such as suspected spinal cord compression.
Background
Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death in children, after 1 year of age [1], despite the vast improvement in cancer treatment. Over the last 20 years, the overall 5-year survival rates now reach approximately 80% [2–4]. Nevertheless, increased awareness and rapid assessment of acute oncological-related emergencies could further reduce poor outcomes. Whilst paediatric malignancies are comparatively rarer than in the adult population, they are biologically very different and consist of differing tumour types which predispose to differing types of emergency presentation [5]. Many emergency physicians have little experience of paediatric oncological emergencies and may feel ill-equipped in such complex scenarios to understand the extent of the underlying medical and mechanical issues faced [6]. Given that imaging plays a pivotal role in these scenarios, the radiologist is in a privileged position whereby a high level of interpretative acumen can make the difference between life and death.
This pictorial review serves to illustrate the many facets and scenarios seen during emergency presentations of paediatric cancers. We outline the abnormalities and best imaging modalities for each scenario by body systems and include cases seen at presenting diagnosis, prior to curative surgical resection and unrelated to chemotoxic agents. Acute presentations relating to complications of treatment and infective diseases are not included, given their substantial coverage elsewhere in the literature [7–10].
Neurological emergencies
Raised intracranial pressure
Tumours of the central nervous system are the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in children [11], with the majority located in the infratentorium [12]. Both low- and high-grade tumours may cause acute hydrocephalus either from extrinsic compression or intraventricular extension of the tumour adjacent to the foramen of Monroe, cerebral aqueduct, fourth ventricle and outlet foramina [13]. The commonest low-grade tumour in the posterior fossa includes pilocytic astrocytomas whilst high-grade tumours are divided into ependymomas and embryonal tumours (such as medulloblastomas, atypical terato-rabdoid tumours (ATRT) and embryonal tumours with multi-layered rosettes (ETMR)) [12]. (Fig. 1a, b) In the emergency setting however, determining the tumour subtype is not the main goal, which should be directed towards identification and localisation of the mass, any adverse complications (e.g. hydrocephalus or haemorrhage) and aiding the neurologists and neurosurgeons in planning subsequent clinical interventions. This may include the insertion of an extraventricular drain (EVD) in the first instance, to help relieve the hydrocephalus, occasionally to drain haemorrhage and provide ongoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring [14]. One large case series of approximately 180 children found that an underlying cerebral neoplasm was the primary indication for an EVD in almost a third (32.2%) of cases, with astrocytomas accounting for 43.1% of all responsible tumours [13].
Presenting symptoms can be variable depending on age and commonly non-specific in nature. On the whole, intracranial malignancies have a subacute onset and commonly present with changes in mood, headache or intermittent seizures [15]. In rare instances, such as during a neurological emergency, a primary tumour or intracranial metastasis may present with symptoms of raised ICP and hydrocephalus due to obstruction (such as from a posterior fossa mass [12]) or overproduction (e.g. from choroid plexus papilloma) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In certain cases, the interval increase in perilesional oedema or intra-tumoural haemorrhage may be the precipitating event leading to the acute emergency [15]. Late clinical signs of a raised intracranial pressure may lead to the Cushing’s triad (reduced respiratory rate, bradycardia, systolic hypertension) as well as seizures.
Focal neurology and stroke-like symptoms are more likely from tumour haemorrhage or venous infarction from cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) which although rare, has been associated with childhood intracranial malignancies [17]. In one review by Sebire et al., 4% of children presenting with CVST had an underlying brain tumour at presentation, with the sagittal and transverse sinuses most commonly involved [18].
Imaging protocols for acute intracranial oncological pathologies are similar to those in children without suspected malignancies. Cranial ultrasound is a quick and accessible screening test in patients with patent fontanelles. Ventricular dilatation, a mass lesion or focally abnormal parenchymal echotexture in the context of stroke or haemorrhage, can be easily and quickly demonstrated. Colour Doppler can easily assess the superior sagittal sinus for thrombosis. Unenhanced computed tomography (CT) allows for rapid identification of intracranial shift, haemorrhage, oedema and hydrocephalus, and enhanced CT (in the form of CT venography) can be used to demonstrate deep sinus thrombosis or arterial compromise. Ultimately, neurosurgical consultation should be obtained, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) used for further lesion characterisation [19], particularly of posterior fossa masses which are better depicted with MR. Fortunately, brainstem herniation is a rare occurrence, but children presenting with these features should be imaged with the most definitive modality available, which in most cases will be MRI.
Cord compression and cauda equina syndrome
Acute spinal cord compression occurs in 3–5% of children with cancer at diagnosis [20], usually from external compression by a paravertebral tumour (Fig. 2), commonly presenting with back pain [21]. Prolonged compression can progress to irreversible neurological damage within hours [22].
Potential causative lesions commonly include neuroblastomas (with 5–15% of such cases having spinal canal involvement [23] at diagnosis) and less frequently soft tissue sarcomas (Ewing’s sarcoma or rhabdomyosarcoma), Hodgkin’s lymphoma and primary spinal cord tumours (such as ependymomas, astrocytomas and intraspinal chloromas in acute myeloid leukaemia).
Rarely, metastatic disease affecting the leptomeninges of the spine can occur. Whilst this heralds a poor outcome in adults, the prognosis in children is better, and early identification can allow for a more considerate and careful planning of chemotherapy and, rarely, adjuvant radiotherapy treatments. In recent years, improvements in survival have been shown with proton beam therapy [24] (Fig. 3).
In the above scenarios, plain radiographs of the spine are generally unhelpful. MRI imaging is the ideal modality and should include the entire neuraxis (the brain and whole spine), with sedation and analgesia occasionally required to allow for adequate patient positioning. Following the initial imaging of the brain, an additional dose of gadolinium contrast agent is not required—the dose provided for post-contrast brain imaging is normally sufficient for the spine given that both body areas are usually imaged within the same sitting, lasting less than 1hour in length [25].
Proptosis
Causes of proptosis include benign and malignant pathologies. Orbital cellulitis is often clinically apparent with CT being used to confirm post-septal extension. MRI examination through the orbits is often definitive for benign aetiologies, with orbital haemangiomas and pseudotumour having characteristic MR appearances [26]. The most common primary malignancy to present with proptosis is orbital rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and confers a high risk of blindness if diagnosis is delayed (Fig. 4) [27]. RMS accounts for 4% of all paediatric malignancies, with 10% occurring in the orbit, most frequently within the first decade. If the primary lesion is less than 5 cm and embryonal-type histologically, local staging with MRI is often sufficient. If larger than 5 cm or alveolar-type, full-body PET-CT should be performed [28]. Causes of orbital metastases include malignant rhabdoid tumour (MRT) (Fig. 5) which typically presents with rapidly progressive proptosis in infants [29, 30]. As such, MR imaging should include the orbits and neuraxis, as synchronous primary and secondary intracranial neoplasms are seen in 15% of cases [31]. In malignant rhaboid tumours, the kidney is the most frequent site of origin with metastases to the lungs being common. Therefore further work-up should also include imaging of these body systems.
Intra-thoracic emergencies
Airway compression and SVC syndrome
The smaller diameter and compressible nature of the trachea in children places them at increased risk of airway obstruction with anterior mediastinal masses. Common aetiologies include lymphoma, leukaemia and germ cell tumours. These tumours may also cause vessel compression [32] resulting in superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome. Thyroid tumours may also cause airway compression but they are rare in children (Fig. 6).
Common symptoms of airway obstruction include cough, stridor and dyspnoea [33], with poor correlation between the severity of symptoms and degree of airway obstruction [34]. Where SVC syndrome is present, children may present with cardiogenic shock from reduced venous return [35].
Plain chest radiographs identify mediastinal masses in 97% of cases, if present [36] and aid assessment of tracheal narrowing. CT or MR imaging will further characterise the mass but may not be practical where there is positional compromise to breathing. In such cases, imaging may need to be obtained with the patient in a semi-upright or prone position (Figs. 7 and 8).
Maintaining a calm presence, minimal child handling and obtaining a tissue diagnosis via the least invasive method possible is recommended [37]. General anaesthesia should only be used if absolutely necessary, with one study finding that those with a tracheal cross-sectional area of < 30% of normal (‘normal’ defined as widest tracheal diameter at the thoracic inlet, with lung apices visible on axial slice) or with the addition of bronchial compression being associated with a greater risk of intra and post-operative complications [38–41].
In the antenatal period, obstetric sonography may identify a potentially fatal airway obstruction from a large neck mass, commonly a cervical teratoma [42] (Fig. 9). Although this is unlikely to present as an acute emergency, careful planning and identification of the relationship between the tumour and adjacent airway and vascular anatomy is crucial. Antenatal MRI has recently been hailed as the most definitive imaging tool for these cases [43], allowing for surgical planning of an ‘ex-utero intrapartum treatment’ (‘EXIT’) of the baby, followed by definitive surgery to remove the tumour. Given the location and potential airway complications in such cases, successful long-term outcomes are usually achieved in just over half of cases [44].
Pleural effusion
Although malignancy is a rare cause, pleural effusion may be seen at diagnosis in 15% of children with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is a marker for poor therapeutic response and relapse. Suggested causes include venous obstruction from bulky disease, leading to a decreased venous return to the heart and reduced lymphatic drainage of the thoracic duct if the left brachiocephalic vein is involved [45]. Pleural effusions are readily demonstrated on chest radiography and pleural ultrasound, with the latter able to assess the complexity, and approximate size of the effusion. Furthermore, ultrasound may be used to identify an appropriate site for surgical drain placement or in image-guided percutaneous drainage [46].
Pericardial effusion and tamponade
Causes of pericardial effusion in paediatric oncology patients are myriad ranging from general medical causes of cardiac failure, side effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation [47] to malignant pericardial effusions. The latter is a rare complication associated with pericardial infiltration from leukaemia and lymphoma [48, 49], intrapericardial [50] or primary cardiac tumours [51] (Fig. 10). Urgent cardiology consultation with echocardiography and a view to proceeding to pericardiocentesis is essential.
Diaphragmatic splinting
Mass effect on the diaphragm from an intra-abdominal mass may cause splinting of the diaphragms, restricted self-ventilation and poor gaseous exchange. Causes can include gross hepatomegaly from primary hepatoblastoma or metastases in stage MS neuroblastomas which may require urgent intubation and ventilatory support (Fig. 11). Ascites associated with primary, typically non-capsulated masses is often a contributing factor, with some relief provided by immediate percutaneous drainage.
Abdominal emergencies
Abdominal compartment syndrome
Abdominal compartment syndrome is a potentially life-threatening complication carrying a mortality rate of up to 60% [52, 53]. The underlying mechanism is one where an increase in abdominal compartment volume exceeds the relative expansion capacity of the abdominal wall. This leads to inadequate end-organ perfusion, organ dysfunction and in extremis, organ failure. Splinting of the diaphragm and pulmonary atelectasis are often concomitant findings.
The diagnosis is clinical; however, by identifying venous compression, particularly IVC obstruction on either an abdominal ultrasound or portal venous phase, post-contrast CT study, the radiologist can help raise awareness [54]. Surgical referral is essential and emergency decompressive laparotomy may be required. Possible aetiologies include any cause of a rapid increase in abdominal contents such as large (bilateral) Wilms tumours [55], rapidly proliferating acute lymphoblastic leukaemic infiltrates [56], giant ovarian masses [57] (Fig. 12) and ascites [58].
Bowel obstruction
Bowel obstruction is frequently caused by intussusception. Whilst relatively common in healthy children with median age at presentation of 8 months [59], occurrence in children over 2 years of age should raise concerns for an underlying neoplastic lead point such as Burkitt’s lymphoma (where intussusception is the primary presentation in 18% of cases) [60] (Fig. 13). Ultrasound is the primary modality for identifying an intussusception and it may also demonstrate the lead point such as diffuse asymmetric bowel wall thickening, a tumour or lymphadenopathy. In such cases, hydrostatic or air enema reduction should be avoided as this is frequently unsuccessful and may have a higher likelihood of complication, such as bowel perforation.
Bowel perforation
Bowel perforation may occur secondary to bowel obstruction, intestinal tumour infiltration (Burkitt’s lymphoma commonly (Fig. 14) [61]) or after intensive radiation and chemotherapy. Imaging with an erect or cross table lateral chest or abdominal radiograph or abdominal ultrasound may reveal pneumoperitoneum.
Obstructive jaundice
Biliary rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare primary malignancy, but the most likely primary tumour to cause biliary tract obstruction, and can be accompanied by abdominal distension and hepatomegaly [62, 63]. Occasionally, it may be misinterpreted as a hepatic mass such as a hepatoblastoma, which can also present with jaundice [64] or as an undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma due to the shared histopathological similarities (although embryonal sarcomas rarely cause biliary obstruction [65]). Lymphadenopathy at the porta hepatis or a pancreatic head mass due to pancreatoblastoma may be large but, again, seldom cause biliary dilatation (Figs. 15 and 16).
The diagnosis of biliary RMS remains challenging and first-line imaging is primarily focussed on ultrasound identification of biliary dilatation, with location of a soft tissue mass, frequently within the common bile duct [66]. Further imaging with MRI and MRCP sequences help to identify the primary mass and potential hepatic metastases [67]. The majority of such lesions are initially treated with chemotherapy (given their chemosensitivity), surgical interventions may be required in cases of relapse or where hepatic transplantation is considered [68, 69].
Urinary tract obstruction
Pelvic masses such as rhabdomyosarcomas, neuroblastomas, sacrococcygeal teratomas and germ cell ovarian tumours in girls may present with distal ureteric obstruction and subsequent upper urinary tract dilatation (Fig. 17). Mass affect from enlarged lymph nodes in lymphoma may be seen in up to in 20% of cases. Finally, any large intra-renal mass may obstruct the urinary collecting system via invasion or mass effect. In the majority of cases, urinary tract obstruction resolves after treatment, with only a minority (13% [54]) requiring intervention. Ureteric stenting is preferred over percutaneous nephrostomy, due to the inherent lower risk of infection. Ultrasound is a reliable first-line modality for assessment of the urinary tract and pelvic masses, which can ultimately be further characterised with MRI.
Haematological and vascular emergencies
Venothromboembolism
Whilst a rare complication (with respect to adults), the incidence of thromboembolism (both deep venous thromboembolism and pulmonary emboli) in children with cancer is still higher than that seen within their healthy counterparts. One British study estimated the thrombosis risk at 1.52 per 1000 person-years for children with cancer (95% CI = 0.57–4.06) versus 0.06 per 1000 person-years (95% CI = 0.02–0.15) in children without cancer [hazard ratio of 28.3 (95% CI = 7.0–114.5)] [70]. Overall, it is more commonly associated with complications from therapy (i.e., indwelling central venous line, steroid or L-asparaginase treatment [71]). Primary malignancies causing increased hyperleucocytosis (e.g. in ALL), reduced mobility (e.g. soft tissue and bone sarcomas [72]) or associated with tumour thrombosis (4–8% of patients with Wilms tumours [34] (Fig. 18)) account for the remainder of cases.
Doppler ultrasound imaging of the extremities, including venous compression techniques should be adopted to identify suspected limb thromboembolism, whilst CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is suitable for suspected pulmonary emboli. Contrast-enhanced CT head for venous sinus thromboses have been discussed earlier in this article. At present, there are no specific guidelines for thromboprophylaxis treatment in children with cancer. It is therefore even more important for radiologists to be astute to the presence of potential thromboembolism in children.
Haemorrhage and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy
Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) is characterised by excessive activation of blood coagulation and consumption of clotting factors. It is found in children with disseminated metastases or secondary to AML [73], where it can cause early death [74]. DIC may also result from a consumptive coagulopathy (Kasabach-Merritt syndrome [75]) associated with vascular tumours such as Kaposiform haemangioendothelioma. Multiphase, intravenous contrast-enhanced CT imaging in the acute scenario can help to confirm the location of the acute haemorrhage for embolization, although treatment is largely supportive (Figs. 19 and 20).
Whilst a pre-contrast CT of the affected body part may be routinely acquired in adult radiology, this is generally avoided in paediatric imaging with only the arterial and portal venous phase imaging being sufficient [76].
Hypertension
End-organ damage or haemorrhagic stroke secondary to refractory hypertension may be the presenting feature of some paediatric malignancies. These can be biochemical in nature (such as from excessive catecholamine production in neuroblastomas or phaeochromocytomas) or from mass effect on the aorta or renal arteries (Fig. 21).
Whilst vascular compression from a mass may be investigated with ultrasound examination and spectral Doppler analysis, definitive characterisation with cross-sectional imaging and angiography should be performed for surgical planning and/or endovascular intervention.
Conclusions
Familiarity with life-threatening oncological emergencies is essential in contributing to the continued low rates of mortality and morbidity in children. Given that most children suffering from an acute complication may not initially present to a specialist centre, it is the responsibility for all general radiologists to have a basic awareness of such cases. In this article, we have provided an overview of the various ways in which oncological complications manifest and the main imaging considerations. Ultimately a multidisciplinary approach with good team communication and prompt action are all required to ensure the best imaging and treatment strategies going forward.
Abbreviations
- 3D
three dimensional
- ALL
Acute lymphoid leukaemia
- AML
Acute myeloid leukaemia
- CSF
Cerebrospinal fluid
- CT
Computed tomography
- CVST
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- DIC
Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy
- ETMR
Embryonal tumours with multi-layered rosettes
- ICP
Intracranial pressure
- MIP
Maximum intensity projection
- MPNST
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour
- MRCP
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MRT
Malignant rhabdoid tumour
- SVC
Superior vena cava
Authors’ contributions
KM and AS conceived of the manuscript concept and idea. SCS and FD obtained the images included in this educational review. SCS, TG, FD, AS and KM all contributed to the writing and editing of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
SCS is supported by a RCUK/UKRI Innovation Fellowship and Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Research Training Fellowship (Grant Ref: MR/R00218/1). This award is jointly funded by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR).
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Diamond CA. Rudolph's fundamentals of pediatrics. In: Rudolph AM, Kamei RK, editors. Rudolph’s fundamentals of pediatrics. Stanford: Appleton & Lange; 1998. pp. 491–510. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pritchard-Jones K, Hargrave D. Declining childhood and adolescent cancer mortality: great progress but still much to be done. Cancer. 2014;120:2388–2391. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Available via: https://seer.cancer.gov/ Accessed 31 Mar 2019
- 4.Nakata K, Ito Y, Magadi W, et al. Childhood cancer incidence and survival in Japan and England: a population-based study (1993-2010) Cancer Sci. 2018;109:422–434. doi: 10.1111/cas.13457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pritchard-Jones K, Pieters R, Reaman GH, et al. Sustaining innovation and improvement in the treatment of childhood cancer: lessons from high-income countries. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:e95–e103. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70010-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kaufmann J, Laschat M. Challenges of being prepared for pediatric emergencies. Prehosp Emerg Care Jun. 2019;19:1–2. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1626957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Nathan PC, Kaste SC. Imaging of acute and subacute toxicities of cancer therapy in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46:9–20. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3454-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shelmerdine Susan C., Chavhan Govind B., Babyn Paul S., Nathan Paul C., Kaste Sue C. Imaging of late complications of cancer therapy in children. Pediatric Radiology. 2016;47(3):254–266. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3708-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hudson MM, Ehrhardt MJ, Bhakta N, et al. Approach for classification and severity grading of long-term and late-onset health events among childhood Cancer survivors in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26:666–674. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Broglie Larisa, Fretham Caitrin, Al-Seraihy Amal, George Biju, Kurtzberg Joanne, Loren Alison, MacMillan Margaret, Martinez Caridad, Davies Stella M., Pasquini Marcelo C. Pulmonary Complications in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019;25(10):2024–2030. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Qaddoumi I, Sultan I, Gajjar A. Outcome and prognostic features in pediatric gliomas: a review of 6212 cases from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Cancer. 2009;115:5761–5770. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.D’Arco Felice, Khan Faraan, Mankad Kshitij, Ganau Mario, Caro-Dominguez Pablo, Bisdas Sotirios. Differential diagnosis of posterior fossa tumours in children: new insights. Pediatric Radiology. 2018;48(13):1955–1963. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4224-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Neilsen N, Pearce K, Limbacher E, Wallace DC (2007) Hydrocephalus. In: Cartwright C, Wallace D (eds) Nursing care of the pediatric neurosurgery patient. Springer, Berlin
- 14.Walker Corey T., Stone Jonathan J., Jacobson Max, Phillips Valerie, Silberstein Howard J. Indications for Pediatric External Ventricular Drain Placement and Risk Factors for Conversion to a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2012;48(6):342–347. doi: 10.1159/000353608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Prabhu Sanjay P., Young-Poussaint Tina. Pediatric Central Nervous System Emergencies. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 2010;20(4):663–683. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2010.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saigal G, Ezuddin NS, Vega G. Neurologic emergencies in pediatric patients including accidental and nonaccidental trauma. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018;28:453–470. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2018.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Okabe Tetsuhiko, Nozaki Taiki, Aida Noriko, Starkey Jay, Enokizono Mikako, Niwa Tetsu, Handa Atsuhiko, Numaguchi Yuji, Kurihara Yasuyuki. MR imaging findings in some rare neurological complications of paediatric cancer. Insights into Imaging. 2018;9(3):313–324. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0628-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sebire G, Tabarki B, Saunders DE, et al. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in children: risk factors, presentation, diagnosis and outcome. Brain. 2005;128:477–489. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wilne S, Collier J, Kennedy C, Koller K, Grundy R, Walker D. Presentation of childhood CNS tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:685–695. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70207-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Prusakowski MK, Cannone D. Pediatric oncologic emergencies. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2014;32:527–548. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2014.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Traylor KS, Kralik SF, Radhakrishnan R. Pediatric spine emergencies. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018;39:605–617. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Higdon ML, Higdon JA. Treatment of oncologic emergencies. Am Fam Physician. 2006;74:1873–1880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Trahair T, Sorrentino S, Russell SJ, et al. Spinal canal involvement in neuroblastoma. J Pediatr. 2017;188:294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ray GL, Buchsbaum JC, McMullen KP, et al. Definitive treatment of leptomeningeal spinal metastases in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:1839–1841. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Warren KE, Vezina G, Poussaint TY et al (2018) Response assessment in medulloblastoma and leptomeningeal seeding tumors: recommendations from the response assessment in pediatric Neuro-oncology committee. Neuro Oncol 20:13–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Kralik SF, Haider KM, Lobo RR, et al. Orbital infantile hemangioma and rhabdomyosarcoma in children: differentiation using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J AAPOS. 2018;22:27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tu Y, Jakobiec FA, Leung K, Freitag SK. Distinguishing benign from malignant circumscribed orbital tumors in children. Semin Opthalmol. 2018;33:116–125. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1353831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Karcioglu ZA, Hadjistilianou D, Rozans M, DeFrancesco S. Orbital rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Control. 2004;11:328–333. doi: 10.1177/107327480401100507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mulay K, Honavar SG. Primary, orbital, malignant extra-renal, non-cerebral rhabdoid tumour. Orbit. 2014;33:292–294. doi: 10.3109/01676830.2014.900088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Biswas A, Kumar R, Bakhshi S, Sen S, Sharma MC (2019) Multimodal management of congenital orbital malignant rhabdoid tumor: review of literature and report of a rare case. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001402 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Husain AN, Pysher TJ (2011) The kidney and lower urinary tract. In: Stocker JT, Dehner LP, Husain AN (eds) Stocker and Dehner's pediatric pathology. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 779–836
- 32.King RM, Telander RL, Smithson WA, et al. Primary mediastinal tumors in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17:512–520. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3468(82)80100-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seth R, Bhat AS. Management of common oncologic emergencies. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78:709–717. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0381-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Garey CL, Laituri CA, Valusek PA, St Peter SD, Snyder CL. Management of anterior mediastinal masses in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011;21(5):310–313. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1279745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Parish JM, Marschke RF Jr, Dines DE, Lee RE (1981) Etiologic considerations in superior vena cava syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 56:407–413 [PubMed]
- 36.Harris GJ, Harman PK, Trinkle JK, Grover FL. Standard biplane roentgenography is highly sensitive in documenting mediastinal masses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44:238–241. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)62061-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sola C, Choquet O, Prodhomme O, et al. Management of mediastinal syndromes in pediatrics: a new challenge of ultrasound guidance to avoid high-risk general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24:534–537. doi: 10.1111/pan.12300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shamberger Robert S., Holzman Robert S., Griscom N.Thorne, Tarbell Nancy J., Weinstein Howard J. CT quantitation of tracheal cross-sectional area as a guide to the surgical and anesthetic management of children with anterior mediastinal masses. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1991;26(2):138–142. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(91)90894-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hack HA, Wright NB, Wynn RF. The anaesthetic management of children with anterior mediastinal masses. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:837–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rath L, Gullahorn G, Connolly N, et al. Anterior mediastinal mass biopsy and resection: anesthetic techniques and perioperative concerns. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;16(4):235–242. doi: 10.1177/1089253212454336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pearson JK, Tan GM. Pediatric anterior mediastinal mass: a review article. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;19(3):248–254. doi: 10.1177/1089253215578931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hirose Shinjiro, Sydorak Roman M., Tsao Kuojen, Cauldwell Charles B., Newman Kurt D., Mychaliska George B., Albanese Craig T., Lee Hanmin, Farmer Diana L. Spectrum of intrapartum management strategies for giant fetal cervical teratoma. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2003;38(3):446–450. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ravelli Anna, Napolitano Marcello, Rustico Mariangela, Riccipetitoni Giovanna, Di Leo Giovanni, Righini Andrea, Sardanelli Francesco. Prenatal MRI of neck masses with special focus on the evaluation of foetal airway. La radiologia medica. 2019;124(9):917–925. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01049-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Masahata Kazunori, Soh Hideki, Tachibana Kazuya, Sasahara Jun, Hirose Masayuki, Yamanishi Tadashi, Ibuka Souji, Okuyama Hiroomi, Usui Noriaki. Clinical outcomes of ex utero intrapartum treatment for fetal airway obstruction. Pediatric Surgery International. 2019;35(8):835–843. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04494-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McCarten Kathleen M., Metzger Monika L., Drachtman Richard A., Pei Qinglin, Friedman Debra L., Schwartz Cindy L., Kelly Kara M. Significance of pleural effusion at diagnosis in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from Children’s Oncology Group protocol AHOD0031. Pediatric Radiology. 2018;48(12):1736–1744. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4197-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.de Lange Charlotte. Radiology in paediatric non-traumatic thoracic emergencies. Insights into Imaging. 2011;2(5):585–598. doi: 10.1007/s13244-011-0113-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Diamond M, Ruiz-Mesa C, Corrales-Medina FF, Tamariz LJ, Ziga E, Swaminathan S. Incidence and outcome of pericardial effusion in pediatric patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplant: a single-institution experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018;40(2):132–136. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Arya LS, Narain S, Thavaraj V, Saxena A, Bhargava M. Leukemic pericardial effusion causing cardiac tamponade. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002;38:282–284. doi: 10.1002/mpo.1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Spottswood SE, Goble MM, Massey GV, Ben-Ezra JM. Acute monoblastic leukemia presenting with pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade. Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24:494–495. doi: 10.1007/BF02015009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kumar IH, Shrote V, Kumar H. Anaesthetic management of a child presenting with intrapericardial teratoma compressing the airway and the heart. Ann Card Anaesth. 2009;12:63–66. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.45016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ashraf T, Day TG, Marek J, Hughes M, Giardini A. A triad: cardiac rhabdomyosarcoma, stroke and tamponade. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34:771–773. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0549-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Divarci E., Karapinar B., Yalaz M., Ergun O., Celik A. Incidence and prognosis of intraabdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2016;51(3):503–507. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Malbrain ML, Chiumello D, Pelosi P, et al. Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:822–829. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2169-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Alexander A, Weber B, Lorenzo A, et al. Hydronephrosis in children with abdominal and pelvic neoplasms: outcome and survival analysis of a single center pediatric oncology series. J Urol. 2011;186:1705–1709. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Weidner BC, Attori RJ, Patterson RF, Berkow RL, Cosper GH, Nakayama DK. Abdominal compartment syndrome after open biopsy for Wilms’ tumor. Am Surg. 2017;83:e360–e361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Terpe F, Siekmeyer M, Bierbach U, et al. Fulminant and fatal course of acute lymphoblastic leukemia due to lactic acidosis and suspected abdominal compartment syndrome. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2012;34:e80–e83. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e31822d4e8c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zavras N, Christianakis E, Ereikat K, Mpourikas D, Velaoras K, Alexandrou J. Intracranial hypertension secondary to abdominal compartment syndrome in a girl with giant ovarian cystic mass. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79:541–542. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0549-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Je BK, Kim HK, Horn PS. Abdominal compartment syndrome in children: clinical and imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212:655–664. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kaiser AD, Applegate KE, Ladd AP. Current success in the treatment of intussusception in children. Surgery. 2007;142:469–475. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gupta Himesh, Davidoff Andrew M., Pui Ching-Hon, Shochat Stephen J., Sandlund John T. Clinical implications and surgical management of intussusception in pediatric patients with Burkitt lymphoma. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2007;42(6):998–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Fallon SC, Redell MS, El-Bietar J, Lopez ME, Vasudevan SA, Brandt ML. Intestinal perforation after treatment of Burkitt's lymphoma: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:436–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kumar V, Chaudhary S, Kumar M, Gangopadhyay AN. Rhabdomyosarcoma of biliary tract- a diagnostic dilemma. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2012;3:314–316. doi: 10.1007/s13193-012-0186-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ruymann FB, Raney RB, Jr, Crist WM, Lawrence W, Jr, Lindberg RD, Soule EH. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the biliary tree in childhood. A report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Cancer. 1985;56:575–581. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850801)56:3<575::AID-CNCR2820560326>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gubernick JA, Rosenberg HK, Ilaslan H, Kessler A. US approach to jaundice in infants and children. Radiographics. 2000;20:173–195. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.1.g00ja25173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nicol Kathleen, Savell Van, Moore Julie, Teot Lisa, Spunt Sheri L., Qualman Stephen. Distinguishing Undifferentiated Embryonal Sarcoma of the Liver from Biliary Tract Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Children's Oncology Group Study. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology. 2007;10(2):89–97. doi: 10.2350/06-03-0068.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Perruccio K, Cecinati V, Scagnellato A, et al. Biliary tract rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the soft tissue sarcoma Committee of the Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica. Tumori. 2018;104(3):232–237. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.D. Malkan Alpin, Fernandez-Pineda Israel. The Evolution of Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Biliary Tract Rhabdomyosarcoma. Current Pediatric Reviews. 2016;12(3):190–198. doi: 10.2174/1573396312666160118104903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Huber J, Sovinz P, Freidl T, et al. Long term survival in two children with rhabdomyosarcoma of the biliary tract. Klin Padiatr. 2008;220(6):378–379. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1083792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shen CH, Dong KR, Tao YF, et al. Liver transplantation for biliary rhabdomyosarcoma with liver metastasis: report of one case. Transplant Proc. 2017;49(1):185–187. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Walker AJ, Grainge MJ, Card TR, et al. Venous thromboembolism in children with cancer – a population-based cohort study. Thromb res. Mar. 2014;133(3):340–344. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Pavor M, Halton J, Dietrich K, et al. Age at cancer diagnosis, non-O blood group and asparaginase therapy are independently associated with deep venous thrombosis in pediatric oncology patients: a risk model. Thromb Res. 2016;144:27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Athale U, Cox S, Siciliano S, Chan AK. Thromboembolism in children with sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49(2):171–176. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Uchiumi H, Matsushima T, Yamane A, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Int J Hematol. 2007;86:137–142. doi: 10.1532/IJH97.06173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Slats AM, Egeler RM, van der Does-van den Berg A, et al. Causes of death--other than progressive leukemia--in childhood acute lymphoblastic (ALL) and myeloid leukemia (AML): the Dutch childhood oncology group experience. Leukemia. 2005;19:537–544. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yuan SM, Shen WM, Chen HN, Hong ZJ, Jian HQ. Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon in Chinese children: report of 19 cases and brief review of literature. J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(6):10006–10010. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Nievelstein RAJ, van Dam IM, van der Molen AJ. Mulitidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40(8):1324–1344. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1714-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.