Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2019 Dec 3;4(25):21063–21071. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02411

Facile Fabrication of C–TiO2 Nanocomposites with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity for Degradation of Tetracycline

Shuaishuai Ma †, Jiandong Gu †, Yingxia Han †, Yuan Gao †, Yuqing Zong ‡, Zhaolian Ye †,*, Jinjuan Xue ‡,*
PMCID: PMC6921265  PMID: 31867498

Abstract

graphic file with name ao9b02411_0006.jpg

Visible-lightdriven C–TiO2 nanocomposites were prepared via a simple calcination and acid etching process. The C–TiO2 nanocomposites were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and high-resolution TEM. The results showed that TiO2 nanoparticles were combined with a porous carbon layer through surface C–O groups, which facilitates the strong interface interaction. The interface combination of nano-TiO2 and carbon material increases the specific surface area of nano-TiO2, widens the range of light response, and improves the efficiency of light-induced electron migration. The visible-light photocatalytic activity of the prepared photocatalyst was evaluated by the decomposition of tetracycline aqueous solution. Compared with that of pure TiO2, the photocatalytic activity of C–TiO2 nanocomposites was significantly improved. Furthermore, a possible photocatalytic mechanism was also tentatively proposed. This work can promote the development of active photocatalysts under solar light for the photodegradation of environmental pollutants.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, more and more attention has been paid to the widespread use and abuse of antibiotics, which may have adverse effects on human health, agriculture, and planting. In antibiotics, tetracycline (TC) is widely used in human medicine, agriculture, aquaculture, and other fields.1−3 However, 70–90% of TC is discharged from the body and ultimately exists in surface water, groundwater, and even drinking water.4,5 To solve these problems effectively, several techniques have been developed, such as absorption, photocatalysis, membrane separation, and electrolysis.6−10 Compared with the traditional technology, semiconductor-mediated photocatalysis has become a hot spot in the research of antibiotic residue treatment recently because it is a green and efficient technology.11,12 For the moment, multiple semiconductors have been researched, including TiO2, SnS2, Bi2O3, ZnO, V2O5, CeO2, and BiPO4.13−19 Among various photocatalysts, TiO2 is regarded as one of the most promising materials because of its stability, high activity, nontoxic nature, and biocompatibility.20 However, its photocatalytic application is still limited due to its wide band gap and high electron–hole recombination rate. Several tactics have been devoted to solve these problems, such as doping, deposition of metals, coupling with narrow band gap semiconductors, or carbonaceous materials as sensitizers.21−27 Especially note that carbonaceous materials with sp2-hybridized carbon atoms have been vastly studied due to their tremendous applications in many fields, such as catalyst supports, adsorbents, and electrode materials.12,28−32 Therefore, introduction of carbon reflects a simple strategy, which can reduce the band gap of TiO2 and coincide with the visible-light spectrum, thus enhancing the photoactivity of the obtained materials.33 Besides, the introduction of carbon can promote the charge transfer from the bulk of the TiO2 structure to the surface area of oxidation reaction and increase the conductivity of TiO2.34−36 In addition, compared with other hybrid materials, carbon can be prepared from environmentally friendly raw materials and has the advantages of stability and low cost.37−39 Moreover, organic pollutants are easily absorbed into carbon, which is a premise of pollutant decomposition.40 Up to now, several carbonaceous materials including graphene, carbon nanotubes, and carbon dots have been introduced into TiO2-based composite photocatalysts, which greatly improves their photocatalytic performance.41−43 Therefore, TiO2–C hybrid materials with a high specific surface area and high conductivity are expected to become photocatalyst with high activity.

In this study, we demonstrated a facile calcination approach and acid etching method to synthesize porous C–TiO2 nanocomposites using the mixture of TiO2, γ-Fe2O3, and starch as a precursor. Herein, porous carbon was used as a support to disperse TiO2 nanoparticles. In principle, the porous structure can improve the light-harvesting ability and the adsorption ability of reactants due to its large specific surface area and multiple scattering effect. TC was chosen as the targeted pollutant to determine the photocatalytic performance of the as-prepared porous C–TiO2 composite catalyst. Compared to that of pure TiO2, porous C–TiO2 hybrid revealed excellent TC degradation efficiencies. Furthermore, the stability of the porous C–TiO2 photocatalyst was investigated and a possible mechanism was proposed.

2. Results and Discussion

The structures of the pristine TiO2 and C–TiO2-2 samples were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectroscopy, and the results are shown in Figure 1a. All of the samples have similar pattern. The diffraction peaks correspond to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), and (116) planes of the tetragonal phase of anatase TiO2 (JCPDS 21-1272), but there are no peaks belonging to rutile phase; the diffraction peaks of carbon are not observed in the complex, which may be due to the low carbon content and relatively low diffraction intensity. The Raman spectra of C–TiO2 nanocomposites (Figure 1b) present the characteristic peaks of both anatase-TiO2 and carbon, among which the peaks at 144 (Eg(1)), 393 (B1g(1)), 512 (A1g + B1g(2)), and 633 cm–1 (Eg(2)) were attributed to the typical modes of anatase-TiO2,5 and the D-band and G-band of carbon at 1321 and 1583 cm–1 shifted a little to 1334 and 1599 cm–1 in C–TiO2 nanocomposites due to the interaction between TiO2 and carbon.39,44,45 In addition, the composition of the C–TiO2-2 and C−γ-Fe2O3/TiO2-2 nanocomposites was studied by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis (Figures 1c and S1). The peaks showed that the C–TiO2-2 product was only composed of Ti, O, and C elements.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) XRD and (b) Raman patterns of the pristine TiO2, carbon, and C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites. EDS (c) spectrum of C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites.

The morphological structure of the samples was examined with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). As shown in Figure 2a, carbon has a layered structure and is a thin sheet with irregular morphology. Figure 2b displays the irregular spheres of the TiO2 particles with diameters in the range of 5–10 nm. The size distribution profile of the TiO2 particles was described in detail through photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS; Figure S2), and the results confirm that the average distribution profile of the TiO2 NPs was 6 nm. For the C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites (Figure 2c), the TiO2 nanoparticles are found embedded in the carbon lamellar structure. A typical HRTEM image of C–TiO2-2 (Figure 2d) identified a crystal spacing of 0.35 nm, which was assigned to the (101) crystal plane of anatase TiO2. In addition, the PCS results in Figure S2 indicate that the average distribution profile of the C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites is also around 6 nm, which can be ascribed to the fact that the carbon layer can effectively prevent the agglomeration of TiO2 at high temperature.46

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Typical TEM images of (a) carbon, (b) pristine TiO2, and (c) C–TiO2-2 hybrid. HRTEM image (d) of C–TiO2-2 nanocomposite.

The full survey spectrum of Figure 3a indicates the presence of titanium (Ti 2p), carbon (C 1s), and oxygen (O 1s) in the C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites. In Figure 3b, the Ti 2p spectrum fitted to two peaks at 458.9 and 464.6 eV, which correspond to Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2 of TiO2,47 respectively. C 1s fine XPS spectra of C–TiO2-2 are shown in Figure 3c. The main C 1s peak for C–TiO2-2 was dominated by elemental carbon at 284.5 eV, attributed mainly to extensively delocalized alternant hydrocarbon; the two peaks at 286.2 and 288.6 eV were characteristic of C–O and C=O bonds of carbonate-like species because of oxidized carbon species, respectively.48 No peak of the Ti–C bond is found in both Ti 2p and C 1s spectra, which indicates that carbon does not exist as a dopant in TiO2.49 With respect to the XPS spectra of O 1s in Figure 3d, the O 1s signal was well fitted with three contributions. The four peaks of 530.0, 530.7, and 532.1 eV should be ascribed to Ti = O, C=O and C–OH, respectively.50 Valence band (VB)-XPS was obtained to further investigate the property of the band structure, which can probe the total density of state (DOS) distribution in the valence band. Figure S3 shows the valence band XPSs of TiO2 and C–TiO2-2. The figure indicates that the VB edge of TiO2 occurs at 2.74 eV and that of C–TiO2-2 shifts toward negative energy compared with TiO2, which is caused by the contribution of C 2p orbitals.51

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

XPS survey spectra (a), high-resolution XPS spectra of Ti 2p (b), C 1s (c), and O 1s (d) core level electrons of the C–TiO2-2 sample.

In Figure 4a, the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of the TiO2 sample exhibits a type IV hysteresis loop according to the IUPAC classifications, which indicates a mesoporous structure of the sample, and the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area was determined to be 77.9 m2·g–1. The pore size distribution of TiO2 calculated by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method and centered at approximately 28.6 nm (inset of Figure 4a) also confirmed such a microporous structure. The C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites exhibited a transitional isotherm from type I to type IV (Figure 4b), which means that micropores and mesopores coexist in the sample.52 In the range of P/P0 = 0.5–1.0, H3 type hysteresis loop was observed, which indicated that there were mesopores in the sample. The quantity of N2 adsorbed can be found in the low-pressure region, which further proves that there are abundant micropores, which is attributed to the voids between the deposited TiO2 nanopariticles. The surface area calculated using the BET method of C–TiO2-2 was 165.5 m2·g–1, which is much higher than that of TiO2 nanoparticles. Figure 4b inset illustrates the pore size distributions of C–TiO2-2 sample, with the pore center at 1–2 nm, and the micropore size dominating the distribution. This increaseded porosity is due to the interaction of synergy and combination, including the effect of sheet morphology and the CO/CO2 physical activation in situ induced from the carbonization of starch. There are some mesopores with pore size of 10–30 nm in the carbon skeleton, which may be related to the removal of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The remaining voids cause these mesopores to have additional porosity.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm and BJH pore size distribution plot (inset) of (a) TiO2 and (b) C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites.

To reveal the functions of carbon, UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) and photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the as-prepared samples were studied in detail. Figure 5a shows the UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the pristine TiO2, pure carbon, and C–TiO2-2 samples. As presented in Figure 5a, pristine TiO2 shows only the basic absorption band in the UV region but no more absorption in the visible region. Compared with pristine TiO2, the C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites have a wide range of light absorption capacity in the whole UV–vis region. This phenomenon might be attributed to two factors: (1) the narrow gap of sp2 carbon cluster embedded in carbon layers possesses excellent light absorption in the whole wavelength range and (2) the joint electronic system formed between TiO2 and carbon could give rise to synergistic properties.53 As depicted in Figure 5b, PL spectra are measured at room temperature using an excitation wavelength of 325 nm to study the recombination process of photoexcited electrons and holes. Apparently, pristine TiO2 exhibited a high electron–hole recombination intensity, while significant quenching of PL over C–TiO2-2 was also observed. The results indicated that the combination of TiO2 and carbon can effectively inhibit the recombination rate of photoinduced electrons and hole pairs, so as to produce more active photocatalytic species and improve the photocatalytic performance. In addition, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of TiO2 and C–TiO2-2 hybrid that is presented as Nyquist plots in Figure S4 attests that the addition of graphite carbon can significantly improve the conductivity of the original TiO2, so as to achieve a rapid interface electron transfer.54

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) UV–vis diffuse reflectance and (b) photoluminescence spectra of the as-prepared samples.

Figure 6a shows the change of the TC concentration with irradiation time in different samples. Before illumination, TC solution was adsorbed on different samples in dark. Obviously, the adsorption capacity of C–TiO2 samples is higher than that of pure TiO2, which might be ascribed to the graphitic carbon layer (sp2 bonding) and porous structure of C–TiO2 photocatalysts. The blank experiment demonstrated that the photodegradation of TC could be neglected without photocatalyst. With pure TiO2 as a catalyst, TC concentration decreased gradually after irradiation for 160 min at the rate of 30.4%. After coupling with carbon, the photocatalytic degradation performance of C–TiO2 samples was greatly improved. Under the same reaction conditions, the degradation rate of C–TiO2-2 samples reached 90.8% after irradiation for 160 min. However, with further increase of carbon content in C–TiO2 nanocomposites, the photocatalytic activity of C–TiO2 nanocomposites decreased rapidly, indicating that the appropriate carbon content is of great significance for the optimization of their photocatalytic activity. To obtain a deep insight into the photocatalytic process, the pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics was fitted according to the equation ln(C0/C) = kt (Figure 6b), where C0 is the initial concentration of the TC solution, C is the concentration of TC at time t, and the slope k is the apparent reaction rate constant. The values of the reaction rate constant (k) are estimated to be 0.00221 and 0.01258 min–1 for pristine TiO2 and C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites, respectively. The rate constant of C–TiO2-2 is up to 5.69-fold higher than that of the bare TiO2. The higher photocatalytic activity of C–TiO2-2 was because its two-dimensional porous carbon layer enhanced the light absorption region, inhibited the recombination rate of photoelectrons and holes, and enhanced TC adsorption through the π–π stacking.55−57 On the other hand, compared to pristine TiO2, C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites showed a lowered ζ-potential value at pH = 4.5 (Figure S5), which means a better dispersion of C–TiO2-2 hybrid compared to that of pristine TiO2 nanoparticles.58 Cyclic experiments of TC degradation in the presence of C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites were carried out to study the stability and reusability of the photocatalyst. As revealed in Figure 7, after five cycles of operation, the photodegradation efficiency of TC did not decrease significantly, which shows that the C–TiO2-2 photocatalyst has the advantages of high efficiency, reusability, and good stability and has potential practical application value in wastewater treatment.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Photocatalytic activities and (b) kinetics of the as-prepared samples for TC degradation under visible-light irradiation.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Recycling reaction of TC degradation using C–TiO2-2.

To elucidate the photodegradation pathway of TC in the presence of C–TiO2-2, the main intermediate products of TC transformation in the photodegradation process were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS). The mass spectra of TC after reacting for 60 min by C–TiO2-2 are displayed in Figure S6. As shown in Figure S6 and Table S1, TC is completely transformed to seven main photoproducts, which are designated as P1–P7 in the order of retention time. Combining with these detection results and references,59−61 degradation and removal process can be divided into three main pathways (Figure 8). The first pathway is the primary degradation by the addition of hydroxyl locating at C11a–C12 and C2–C3 double-bond of TC with the attack of the •OH radicals to generate the intermediate with m/z 475.3, which is further fragmented to the product P2 (m/z 396.9) via the deprivation of methyl from the tertiary amine and amide group. Meanwhile, TC was oxidized at position 11 to the corresponding ketone to form the product P3 (m/z 453.5), and then the amino group at position 1 was bi-demethylated due to the low bond energy of C–N. Subsequently, the dehydroxylation reaction occurred at position 2 and then product P4 (m/z 417.2) was produced. In addition, the deprotonated product P5 with m/z of 383.2 was generated via loss of N-dimethyl group due to the relatively low bond energy of C–N and the loss of the hydroxyl group. Subsequently, the protonated product P6 with m/z 340.3 was generated through the detachment of amide group from intermediate of m/z 383.2. The detachment of water molecule and hydroxyl group involved in the formation of protonated products P7 with m/z 306.3. Thus, it can be seen that TC is gradually decomposed to produce the corresponding degradation intermediates, which can then be converted into CO2, H2O, and other degradation products.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Removal pathway of TC over C–TiO2-2 sample.

Based on the above results and discussion, Figure 9 schematically proposes the possible mechanisms of the high photodegradation activity of C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites, including photogenerated electron–hole separation process and free radical formation process. First, the introduction of two-dimensional carbon sheets result in the C–TiO2-2 sample having a larger specific surface area, thus providing a more active reaction center. When the as-prepared C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites are irradiated with visible light, the photogenerated electrons were excited from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB) and then migrate into carbon layers due to the tight coupling of TiO2 nanoparticles, resulting in the effective separation of electrons and holes. The separated electrons can react with the adsorbed O2 to form •O2– for the photo-oxidation of the TC molecules.5 The remaining holes in TiO2 can also participate in the redox reactions by forming •OH radicals.62 Therefore, the photogenerated electrons and holes were efficiently separated, and the lifetime of the excited electrons and holes could be prolonged in the transfer process. In summary, the significant improvement of the photocatalytic activity of C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites is caused by the improvement of solar energy utilization, the enrichment and adsorption of pollutants, and the subsequent effective separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Illustration of the mechanism for the enhanced photocatalytic activity over C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites.

3. Conclusions

In summary, the C–TiO2 nanocomposites were successfully fabricated by a facile calcination approach and acid etching method. The experimental results showed that C–TiO2-2 nanocomposites exhibited superior visible-light photocatalytic activity for the degradation of TC, and the degradation rate was about 5.69 times higher than that of pristine TiO2. The significant improvement of photocatalytic activity is attributed to the increase of specific surface area, the enhancement of light harvesting ability, and the effective separation of photogenerated carriers. In all, the obtained C–TiO2-2 photocatalyst has potential application in solving the problems of worldwide environmental pollution and energy crisis by efficiently utilizing solar energy.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Reagents and Chemicals

Titanium dioxide (TiO2, 5–10 nm), γ-ferric oxide (γ-Fe2O3, 20 nm), and tetracycline (TC) were supplied by Aladdin (Shanghai, China) and used without further purification. Starch was obtained from Alibaba.

4.2. Preparation of Photocatalysts

As shown in Figure 10, porous C–TiO2 composites were fabricated via a facile calcination approach and acid etching method using starch as a carbon source; γ-Fe2O3 sphere acts as a graphitization catalyst precursor and a hard template. Typically, 2.0 g of starch was uniformly mixed with 0.2 g of γ-Fe2O3 and 4.0 g of TiO2 by a co-ground method. The resulting powder was then heated at a rate of 3 °C min–1 to reach a temperature of 800 °C and then kept at this temperature for another 2 h in a N2 atmosphere. The calcined product was washed with hot 3.0 M HCl solution and deionized water for several times to remove the iron species and other metal oxides or salts and dried at 60 °C to get the final C–TiO2 nanocomposites. By varying the amounts of starch, the obtained C–TiO2 samples were denoted as C–TiO2-1, C–TiO2-2, C–TiO2-3, and C–TiO2-5 with 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 g of starch added, respectively. For comparison, carbon was obtained directly from the carbonization of starch at 800 °C for 2 h.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Schematic illustration of the preparation processes of the porous C–TiO2 hybrids.

4.3. Characterization of Photocatalysts

X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed on a SmartLab XRD spectrometer (Rigaku) with Cu Kα radiation. Then, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to analyze the elements of the as-prepared sample. Raman spectra were collected using a DXR Raman microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., λexc = 532 nm). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were obtained with a JEM-2100 high-resolution transmission electron microscope. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement and XPS valance band (VB) spectra were performed on an ESCALAB 250Xi photoelectron spectroscope (Thermo Fisher Co.) equipped with a standard and monochromatic source (Al Kα). Particle size distribution test and surface ζ-potential of the prepared samples were carried out on a Malvern particle size analyzer (Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90). The nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms were measured at 77 K on an ASAP 2020 (Micromeritics). The analysis of intermediates was performed by a HPLC–MS system (Agilent 1290/6460, Triple Quad MS) equipped with a Zorbax XDB-C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm2, 3.5 μm). UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV–vis DRS) were recorded on a UV–vis spectrometer (UV-3650, Shimadzu) with an integrating sphere attachment. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were carried out on a CHI920 workstation. The PL spectra were measured at room temperature on a Shimadzu RF-5301 fluorescence spectrophotometer with a 325 nm excitation wavelength.

4.4. Photocatalytic Activity

The typical photocatalytic experiment was carried in a Pyrex reactor with reflux water at room temperature. The photocatalytic activities of the samples were evaluated by the degradation of TC under visible-light irradiation. In a typically photocatalytic test, of the photocatalyst (10 mg) was added to 50 mL of TC aqueous solution (10 mg L–1), and the suspension was magnetically stirred for 0.5 h in the dark to establish an absorption–desorption equilibrium before switching on the lamp. Samples were taken at preselected time intervals using a syringe and filtered through a 0.45 μm poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) syringe filter to remove particles. The quantitative determination of TC was analyzed by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu LC-20A). After TC photodegradation, the catalysts were filtrated and washed with water. Then, they were added to a photoreactor to be reused in another TC solution to perform the same photodegradation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21808019), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant Nos. BK20181048, BK20180958, and BK20181476), the Science and Technology Bureau of Changzhou (CJ20190074), the Science Foundation of Jiangsu University of Technology (KYY17001), the Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province (18KJB150014), and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (SJCX19_0738).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.9b02411.

  • EDS spectrum; photon correlation spectroscopy; VB XPS spectra; Nyquist plots; ζ-potential; mass spectra of the TC and intermediates; identified TC and its possible transformation products (PDF)

Author Contributions

§ S.M. and J.G. contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao9b02411_si_001.pdf (821.2KB, pdf)

References

  1. Luo B.; Xu D.; Li D.; Wu G.; Wu M.; Shi W.; Chen M. Fabrication of a Ag/Bi3TaO7 plasmonic photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity for degradation of tetracycline. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 17061–17069. 10.1021/acsami.5b03535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Luo Y.; Mao D.; Rysz M.; Zhou Q.; Zhang H.; Xu L.; Alvarez P. J. J. Trends in antibiotic resistance genes occurrence in the Haihe River, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7220–7225. 10.1021/es100233w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yuan F.; Hu C.; Hu X.; Wei D.; Chen Y.; Qu J. Photodegradation and toxicity changes of antibiotics in UV and UV/H2O2 process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 185, 1256–1263. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen M.; Jaffé R. Photo-and bio-reactivity patterns of dissolved organic matter from biomass and soil leachates and surface waters in a subtropical wetland. Water Res. 2014, 61, 181–190. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang S.; Xu J.; Hu J.; Cui C.; Liu H. Interfacial growth of TiO2-rGO composite by pickering emulsion for photocatalytic degradation. Langmuir 2017, 33, 5015–5024. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu Q.; Li Z.; Hong H. Adsorption of the quinolone antibiotic nalidixic acid onto montmorillonite and kaolinite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013, 74, 66–73. 10.1016/j.clay.2012.09.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Xu W. H.; Zhang G.; Wai O. W.; Zou S. C.; Li X. D. Transport and adsorption of antibiotics by marine sediments in a dynamic environment. J. Soils Sediments 2009, 9, 364–373. 10.1007/s11368-009-0091-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu X.; Gao X.; Lu Z.; Liu X.; Huo P.; Liu X.; Wu D.; Yan Y. Preparation and photodegradation properties of transition metal ion–poly-o-phenylenediamine/TiO2/fly-ash cenospheres by ion imprinting technology. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 14807–14813. 10.1039/c3ra00124e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yan X.; Wang X.; Gu W.; Wu M.; Yan Y.; Hu B.; Che G.; Han D.; Yang J.; Fan W.; Shi W. Single-crystalline AgIn (MoO4)2 nanosheets grafted Ag/AgBr composites with enhanced plasmonic photocatalytic activity for degradation of tetracycline under visible light. Appl. Catal., B 2015, 164, 297–304. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jiang D.; Xiao P.; Shao L.; Li D.; Chen M. RGO-promoted all-solid-state g-C3N4/BiVO4 Z-scheme heterostructure with enhanced photocatalytic activity toward the degradation of antibiotics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 8823–8832. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b01840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Y.; Park S. J. Bimetallic AuPd alloy nanoparticles deposited on MoO3 nanowires for enhanced visible-light driven trichloroethylene degradation. J. Catal. 2018, 361, 238–247. 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang Y.; Park S. J. Facile construction of MoO3@ZIF-8 core-shell nanorods for efficient photoreduction of aqueous Cr (VI). Appl. Catal., B 2019, 240, 92–101. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Loh L.; Briscoe J.; Dunn S. Chemical protection of ZnO nanorods at ultralow pH to form a hierarchical BiFeO3/ZnO core-shell structure. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 152–157. 10.1021/am505019p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kakuma Y.; Nosaka A. Y.; Nosaka Y. Difference in TiO2 photocatalytic mechanism between rutile and anatase studied by the detection of active oxygen and surface species in water. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 18691–18698. 10.1039/C5CP02004B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiang H.-Y.; Liu J.; Cheng K.; Sun W.; Lin J. Enhanced visible light photocatalysis of Bi2O3 upon fluorination. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 20029–20036. 10.1021/jp406834d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shanmugam M.; Alsalme A.; Alghamdi A.; Jayavel R. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of the graphene-V2O5 nanocomposite in the degradation of methylene blue dye under direct sunlight. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 14905–14911. 10.1021/acsami.5b02715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zeng M.; Li Y.; Mao M.; Bai J.; Ren L.; Zhao X. Synergetic effect between photocatalysis on TiO2 and thermocatalysis on CeO2 for gas-phase oxidation of benzene on TiO2/CeO2 nanocomposites. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3278–3286. 10.1021/acscatal.5b00292. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang Y.; Park S. J. Formation of hollow MoO3/SnS2 heterostructured nanotubes for efficient light-driven hydrogen peroxide production. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 20304–20312. 10.1039/C8TA08385A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang Y.; Park S. J. Au-pd bimetallic alloy nanoparticle-decorated BiPO4 nanorods for enhanced photocatalytic oxidation of trichloroethylene. J. Catal. 2017, 355, 1–10. 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang C.; Wu Y.; Lu J.; Zhao J.; Cui J.; Wu X.; Yan Y.; Huo P. Bioinspired synthesis of photocatalytic nanocomposite membranes based on synergy of Au-TiO2 and polydopamine for degradation of tetracycline under visible light. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 23687–23697. 10.1021/acsami.7b04902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin C. J.; Liou Y. H.; Zhang Y.; Chen C. L.; Dong C.-L.; Chen S.-Y.; Stucky G. D. Mesoporous Fe-doped TiO2 sub-microspheres with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light illumination. Appl. Catal., B 2012, 127, 175–181. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang J.; Mao B.; Gole J. L.; Burda C. Visible-light-driven reversible and switchable hydrophobic to hydrophilic nitrogen-doped titania surfaces: correlation with photocatalysis. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 2257–2261. 10.1039/c0nr00313a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. In S.; Orlov A.; Berg R.; García F.; Pedrosa-Jimenez S.; Tikhov M. S.; Wright D. S.; Lambert R. M. Effective visible light-activated B-doped and B, N-codoped TiO2 photocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13790–13791. 10.1021/ja0749237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sakthivel S.; Kisch H. Daylight photocatalysis by carbon-modified titanium dioxide. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4908–4911. 10.1002/anie.200351577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li G.-S.; Zhang D.-Q.; Yu J. C. A new visible-light photocatalyst: CdS quantum dots embedded mesoporous TiO2. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 7079–7085. 10.1021/es9011993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen C.; Cai W.; Long M.; Zhou B.; Wu Y.; Wu D.; Feng Y. Synthesis of visible-light responsive graphene oxide/TiO2 composites with p/n heterojunction. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 6425–6432. 10.1021/nn102130m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee S.; Lee Y.; Kim D. H.; Moon J. H. Carbon-deposited TiO2 3D inverse opal photocatalysts: visible-light photocatalytic activity and enhanced activity in a viscous solution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 12526–12532. 10.1021/am403820e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gong Y.; Li D.; Luo C.; Fu Q.; Pan C. Highly porous graphitic biomass carbon as advanced electrode materials for supercapacitors. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 4132–4140. 10.1039/C7GC01681F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. To J. W.; He J.; Mei J.; Haghpanah R.; Chen Z.; Kurosawa T.; Chen S.; Bae W.-G.; Pan L.; Tok J. B.-H.; et al. Hierarchical N-doped carbon as CO2 adsorbent with high CO2 selectivity from rationally designed polypyrrole precursor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1001–1009. 10.1021/jacs.5b11955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhuang Z.; Giles S. A.; Zheng J.; Jenness G. R.; Caratzoulas S.; Vlachos D. G.; Yan Y. Nickel supported on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as hydrogen oxidation reaction catalyst in alkaline electrolyte. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10141 10.1038/ncomms10141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang Y.; Park S. J. Stabilization of dispersed CuPd bimetallic alloy nanoparticles on ZIF-8 for photoreduction of Cr(VI) in aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 353–362. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang Y.; Park S. J. Incorporation of RuO2 into charcoal-derived carbon with controllable microporosity by CO2 activation for high-performance supercapacitor. Carbon 2017, 122, 287–297. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kwon H.; Mota F. M.; Chung K.; Jang Y. J.; Hyun J. K.; Lee J.; Kim D. H. Enhancing Solar Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity of Mesoporous Carbon-TiO2 Hybrid Films via Upconversion Coupling. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1310–1317. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03658. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Janus M.; Inagaki M.; Tryba B.; Toyoda M.; Morawski A. Carbon-modified TiO2 photocatalyst by ethanol carbonisation. Appl Catal., B 2006, 63, 272–276. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Xiao Q.; Ouyang L. Photocatalytic activity and hydroxyl radical formation of carbon-doped TiO2 nanocrystalline: effect of calcination temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 148, 248–253. 10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dong F.; Guo S.; Wang H.; Li X.; Wu Z. Enhancement of the visible light photocatalytic activity of C-doped TiO2 nanomaterials prepared by a green synthetic approach. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 13285–13292. 10.1021/jp111916q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Demir-Cakan R.; Baccile N.; Antonietti M.; Titirici M.-M. Carboxylate-rich carbonaceous materials via one-step hydrothermal carbonization of glucose in the presence of acrylic acid. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 484–490. 10.1021/cm802141h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Titirici M.-M.; Antonietti M. Chemistry and materials options of sustainable carbon materials made by hydrothermal carbonization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 103–116. 10.1039/B819318P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang J.; Vasei M.; Sang Y.; Liu H.; Claverie J. P. TiO2@carbon photocatalysts: the effect of carbon thickness on catalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 1903–1912. 10.1021/acsami.5b10025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hahn R.; Schmidt-Stein F.; Salonen J.; Thiemann S.; Song Y.; Kunze J.; Lehto V. P.; Schmuki P. Semimetallic TiO2 Nanotubes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7236–7239. 10.1002/anie.200902207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rajender G.; Kumar J.; Giri P. Interfacial charge transfer in oxygen deficient TiO2-graphene quantum dot hybrid and its influence on the enhanced visible light photocatalysis. Appl. Catal., B 2018, 224, 960–972. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zeng Y.; Chen D.; Chen T.; Cai M.; Zhang Q.; Xie Z.; Li R.; Xiao Z.; Liu G.; Lv W. Study on heterogeneous photocatalytic ozonation degradation of ciprofloxacin by TiO2/carbon dots: Kinetic, mechanism and pathway investigation. Chemosphere 2019, 227, 198–206. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Natarajan T. S.; Lee J. Y.; Bajaj H. C.; Jo W.-K.; Tayade R. J. Synthesis of multiwall carbon nanotubes/TiO2 nanotube composites with enhanced photocatalytic decomposition efficiency. Catal. Today 2017, 282, 13–23. 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.03.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Elizalde-González M. P.; García-Díaz E.; Sabinas-Hernández S. A. Novel preparation of carbon-TiO2 composites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 263, 73–83. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hu Y. S.; Demir-Cakan R.; Titirici M. M.; Müller J. O.; Schlögl R.; Antonietti M.; Maier J. Superior storage performance of a Si@SiOx/C nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1645–1649. 10.1002/anie.200704287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yan L.; Chen G.; Zhou M.; Luo H. M. Oxygen-deficient Niobium Oxide in Carbon Matrix as Anode for Lithium-Ion Battery. ECS Trans. 2015, 66, 277–283. 10.1149/06609.0277ecst. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang H.; Yuan X.; Wu Y.; Zeng G.; Dong H.; Chen X.; Leng L.; Wu Z.; Peng L. In situ synthesis of In2S3@ MIL-125 (Ti) core-shell microparticle for the removal of tetracycline from wastewater by integrated adsorption and visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Appl. Catal., B 2016, 186, 19–29. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sun X.; Li Y. Colloidal carbon spheres and their core/shell structures with noble-metal nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 597–601. 10.1002/anie.200352386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Irie H.; Watanabe Y.; Hashimoto K. Nitrogen-concentration dependence on photocatalytic activity of TiO2-xNx powders. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5483–5486. 10.1021/jp030133h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yu X.; Liu J.; Yu Y.; Zuo S.; Li B. Preparation and visible light photocatalytic activity of carbon quantum dots/TiO2 nanosheet composites. Carbon 2014, 68, 718–724. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lu Z.; Zeng L.; Song W.; Qin Z.; Zeng D.; Xie C. S. In situ synthesis of C-TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction nanocomposite as highly visible light active photocatalyst originated from effective interfacial charge transfer. Appl. Catal., B 2017, 202, 489–499. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Chang B.; Yin H.; Zhang X.; Zhang S.; Yang B. Chemical blowing strategy synthesis of nitrogen-rich porous graphitized carbon nanosheets: morphology, pore structure and supercapacitor application. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 312, 191–203. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhao L.; Chen X.; Wang X.; Zhang Y.; Wei W.; Sun Y.; Antonietti M.; Titirici M. M. One-step solvothermal synthesis of a carbon@TiO2 dyade structure effectively promoting visible-light photocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3317–3321. 10.1002/adma.201000660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tan L.; Pan L.; Cao C.; Wang B.; Li L. Nitrogen-doped carbon coated TiO2 nanocomposites as anode material to improve cycle life for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 253, 193–200. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zheng X.; Luo J.; Lv W.; Wang D. W.; Yang Q. H. Two-Dimensional Porous Carbon: Synthesis and Ion-Transport Properties. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 5388–5395. 10.1002/adma.201501452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Cao M.; Wang P.; Ao Y.; Wang C.; Hou J.; Qian J. Visible light activated photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by a magnetically separable composite photocatalyst: graphene oxide/magnetite/cerium-doped titania. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 467, 129–139. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Chang B.; Yin H.; Zhang X.; Zhang S.; Yang B. Chemical blowing strategy synthesis of nitrogen-rich porous graphitized carbon nanosheets: morphology, pore structure and supercapacitor application. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 312, 191–203. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Bahadur N. M.; Chowdhury F.; Obaidullah M.; Hossain M.; Rashid R.; Akter Y.; Furusawa T.; Sato M.; Suzuki N. Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic application of SiO2@TiO2 core-shell nanocomposite particles. J. Nanomater. 2019, 2019, 6368789 10.1155/2019/6368789. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Xu Y.; Lin D.; Liu X.; Luo Y.; Xue H.; Huang B.; Chen Q.; Qian Q. Electrospun BiOCl/Bi2Ti2O7 nanorod heterostructures with enhanced solar light efficiency in the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 2496–2504. 10.1002/cctc.201800100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hu X.; Sun Z.; Song J.; Zhang G.; Li C.; Zheng S. Synthesis of novel ternary heterogeneous BiOCl/TiO2/sepiolite composite with enhanced visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity towards tetracycline. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 533, 238–250. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Gao B.; Dong S.; Liu J.; Liu L.; Feng Q.; Tan N.; Liu T.; Bo L.; Wang L. Identification of intermediates and transformation pathways derived from photocatalytic degradation of five antibiotics on ZnIn2S4. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 304, 826–840. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Huang Y.; Kang S.; Yang Y.; Qin H.; Ni Z.; Yang S.; Li X. Facile synthesis of Bi/Bi2WO6 nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light. Appl. Catal., B 2016, 196, 89–99. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao9b02411_si_001.pdf (821.2KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES