Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC)-enriched storage medium on fresh osteochondral viability at 4°C. Our hypothesis was that the cell viability of chondrocytes obtained from human osteochondral tissue and stored at 4°C significantly improves in the presence of NAC.
Design
Controlled laboratory study. For this study, 8 samples of femoral condyle osteochondral tissue were obtained from patients undergoing total knee replacement. The samples were stored at either 4°C in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or at 3 different concentrations of NAC (NAC 1, 2, and 5 mM). Cell viability was analyzed at time 0 and 4 weeks by flow cytometry. The results of cell viability (median) were analyzed statistically using analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
The viability at time 0 was 95.5% ± 3.7%. At 4 weeks, the cell viability was 56.8% ± 20.1% in the control group (PBS), 83.8% ± 11.9% in the group stored with NAC 1 mM, 73.4% ± 13.6% in the group stored with NAC 2 mM, and 66.4% ± 27.7% in the group stored with NAC 5 mM. A statistically significant difference from the baseline viability (time 0) was observed in the PBS control group (P = 0.0018) but not in the other groups. A statistically significant difference was observed in the NAC 1 mM group compared with the PBS group (P = 0.0255).
Conclusion
The use of NAC at 1 mM concentration improves cell viability after 4 weeks of storage in chondrocytes obtained from human osteochondral tissue.
Keywords: osteochondral allografts, chondrocyte viability, storage medium, tissue banking
Introduction
Full-thickness chondral and osteochondral defects are common in active young patients.1 Because articular cartilage has a limited potential of regeneration, even minor injuries can lead to the development of progressive joint damage and global joint degeneration or osteoarthritis.2,3 This leads to high levels of disability and therefore high health care costs.4 Multiple alternatives have been described for the treatment of cartilage injuries such as subchondral drilling, microfracture, autologous and allogeneic osteochondral grafts, and autologous chondrocyte implantation, with variable results described in the literature.5-8
When one of the “first-line” treatments fails in a young patient, the use of fresh osteochondral allografts is an alternative to consider, particularly in those secondary to fractures and osteochondritis dissecans.9 Several studies have shown good results in the medium and long term.10-13 Davidson et al.,11 in one of the largest series of patients treated with osteochondral allografts, demonstrated a statistically significant difference in functional assessments and implanted tissue features compared to pre-operative status, with an average follow up of 40 months. Krych et al.12 observed in a study of 43 patients treated with this technique a return to sports rate of 88%, while the return to the same preinjury level was 79%.
Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation is based on mature hyaline cartilage transplantation at the site of the lesion, with viable chondrocytes that can withstand storage under hypothermic conditions. The advantages of this technique are as follows: (1) flexibility in adjusting the size of the graft to the size of the lesion, especially important in larger defects; (2) a blood supply and innervation are not required; (3) it does not generate a significant immune reaction in the host14; and (4) it does not cause donor site morbidity. Disadvantages include a low rate of donors in our country (Chile), limitations on tissue storage, time for use, and low risk of transmission of infectious disease.9
Several studies have evaluated the storage conditions of osteochondral allografts to extend the storage as long as possible while maintaining optimal cell viability.15-18 The storage time has not yet been well defined. The initial studies described that the time window between tissue procurement and transplantation should not exceed 48 hours, but more recent studies have extended this period to 14 to 28 days.9
Multiple alternatives to the storage medium have been described; saline solution and Ringer’s lactate solution are the most used.9 Apoptosis is the mechanism through which cell viability decreases during the obtaining, storage, and implantation of osteochondral allografts.19 There are different apoptosis-regulating pathways in chondrocytes, but the nitric oxide pathway is dominant in the apoptosis of articular cartilage.20 Moreover, it has been reported that N-acetylcysteine (NAC) prevents apoptosis and degenerative changes in animals.21 Gómez-Lechón et al.22 showed that NAC increases cell viability and decreases apoptosis activation in isolated hepatocytes for cell transplantation.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of NAC-enriched storage medium on fresh osteochondral viability at 4°C at 4 weeks. Our hypothesis was that the cell viability of chondrocytes obtained from human osteochondral tissue and stored at 4°C improves significantly in the presence of NAC.
Materials and Methods
Osteochondral Tissue Harvest
This study was approved by the institutional review board and ethics committee of our institution. The inclusion criteria were patients between 18 and 80 years old who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 18 or older than 80 years, a history of inflammatory arthritis, severe chondral damage in the posterior area of femoral condyles, and the rejection of informed consent.
Osteochondral tissue samples were obtained from 8 patients (5 females/3 males) between 51 and 80 years old (average 70 years) who underwent total knee arthroplasty at our center. Two patients were classified as Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 2, 4 were classified as KL grade 3, and 2 were classified as KL grade 4.
After performing posterior femoral cuts, the osteochondral tissue samples were placed in a sterile container in saline solution. The samples were transferred to the laboratory at room temperature within less than 2 hours for processing. Once in the laboratory, the samples were washed in 50 mL Falcon tubes with 30 mL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with gentamicin (200 µL/100 mL). Subsequently, the tissue was divided into 5 parts to assess the cell viability at time 0 (basal cell viability) and at 28 days in 3 concentrations of NAC (1 mM, 2 mM, and 5 mM; control group in PBS). During the 28 days of storage, the samples were maintained at 4°C.
Chondrocyte Viability
Cell viability was quantitatively assessed by flow cytometry. This methodology allows discrimination between vital and nonvital cells according to their ability to uptake fluorescent dyes.23 In each sample, the total thickness of the cartilage was separated from the subchondral bone and then mechanically divided into fragments of approximately 0.5 cm × 1 cm. An enzymatic disaggregation with 1 mg/mL of collagenase in PBS was performed for 12 hours. Subsequently, labeling was performed with SYTO BC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), which labels living cells, and propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St. Louis, MO, USA), which binds to the DNA of nonviable cells. For this, the samples were incubated in the dye solution in the dark for 20 minutes and then evaluated using flow cytometry. To quantify cell viability, the ratio between live cells (SYTO BC positive) and total cells (SYTO BC positive + propidium iodide positive) was determined.18
Statistical Analysis
Results of cell viability (mean ± standard deviation) were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test for paired samples. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Quantitative analysis of chondrocytes viability by flow cytometry for each NAC concentration and control group in PBS is presented in Figure 1 and Table 1 . Cell viability was shown to decrease significantly over time by comparing basal viability after 28 days of storage in PBS (95.5% ± 3.7% vs 56.8% ± 20.1%; P = 0.0018). Although the viability of chondrocytes stored at different concentrations of NAC at 28 days (NAC 1 mM 83.8% ± 11.9%, NAC 2 mM 73.4% ± 13.6%, and NAC 5 mM 66.4% ± 27.7%) was lower than the basal viability, these differences were not statistically significant (NAC 1 mM P = 0.0604, NAC 2 mM P = 0.0615, and NAC 5 mM P = 0.1886). When comparing cell viability at 28 days between the different media, it was observed that the media enriched with NAC had a higher percentage of vital cells than the nonenriched medium (PBS); this difference was statistically significant between the NAC 1 mM group and the PBS control group (83.8% ± 11.9% vs 56.8% ± 20.1%, P = 0.0255).
Figure 1.

Basal cell viability and at 4 weeks in NAC-enriched medium (1 mM, 2 mM, and 5 mM). The results correspond to the mean ± SD. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. *P = 0.0018. †P = 0.0255. NAC = N-acetylcysteine; PBS = phosphate-buffered saline.
Table 1.
Cell Viability Quantitatively Assessed by Flow Cytometry.
| Sample | Baseline |
4 weeks |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time 0 | PBS | NAC 1 mM | NAC 2 mM | NAC 5 mM | |
| 1 | 95 | 37 | 85 | 64 | 66 |
| 2 | 100 | 41 | 99 | 70 | 96 |
| 3 | 94 | 50 | 84 | 91 | 91 |
| 4 | 100 | 64 | 82 | 69 | 24 |
| 5 | 92 | 39 | 60 | 50 | 38 |
| 6 | 91 | 61 | 82 | 72 | 46 |
| 7 | 93 | 64 | 81 | 82 | 94 |
| 8 | 99 | 98 | 97 | 89 | 76 |
| Mean ± SD | 95.5 ± 3.7 | 56.8 ± 20.1 | 83.8 ± 11.9 | 73.4 ± 13.6 | 66.4 ± 27.7 |
NAC = N-acetylcysteine; PBS = phosphate-buffered saline.
When comparing cell viability between the groups stored in NAC-enriched medium, it was observed that cell viability presented an inversely proportional relationship to the concentration of NAC; however, the differences between groups were not statistically significant.
Discussion
Several studies have shown that after 14 days of storage, the cellular viability of osteochondral allografts significantly decreases, which could compromise treatment success.15,24,25 However, tissue banks currently require at least 2 weeks for the microbiological and serological graft analysis prior to its availability for use.26 For this reason, it is very relevant to generate information that allows an increase in the storage time of osteochondral allografts without compromising their vitality.
This study demonstrated that the use of an NAC-enriched medium maintains cell viability after 28 days of cold storage. Our results showed that chondrocyte viability decreases to 56.8% ± 20.1% after 28 days in the nonenriched medium. However, by storing the tissue in the presence of NAC, cell viability can be maintained up to 83.8% ± 11.9% after this time.
Several studies have evaluated the effects of storage on the viability of chondrocytes of osteochondral allografts. Ball et al.15 evaluated the storage of human osteochondral allografts in lactated Ringer’s solution and a conventional culture medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium [DMEM]) at different times. They observed that cell viability at 28 days in the lactated Ringer’s group was 29% ± 16%, a statistically significant decrease with respect to the same group that was stored for 7 days. However, by storing the tissue in DMEM, viability remained at 83% ± 10% at 28 days, which is comparable to our results. Moreover, other studies have evaluated the use of conventional culture media such as DMEM as an allograft storage medium, presenting cell viability at 28 days of close to 30% to 60%.27,28 A relevant factor in the maintenance of cell viability in these studies was the need to replace the culture medium every 2 to 3 days,15,29 which represents a disadvantage with respect to the medium evaluated in our study, which did not require any replacement, at least for 28 days. This could be explained by NAC’s blockade of the cellular signaling pathway of nitric oxide in the regulation of chondrocyte apoptosis,21 which could be maintained over time with a NAC concentration of 1 mM.
Although the ideal storage time for osteochondral allografts has not been specifically determined, a recent study showed that beyond storage time, cell viability more than 70% is associated with better clinical outcomes.25 In our study, this cellular viability was achieved at 28 days of storage in the medium enriched with NAC 1 mM and 2 mM.
There are some limitations to our study. First, the samples used corresponded to the cartilage of patients with osteoarthritis who underwent a total knee replacement. Although the cartilage samples used had a healthy macroscopic aspect, the underlying pathology of the patients could affect tissue properties. However, considering the results obtained, this would be in the most “unfavorable” scenario, because the chondrogenic potential is directly related to age.30 Another limitation of this study is that samples from the posterior segment of the femoral condyles were used, not the rest of the knee. It has been observed that the properties of the articular cartilage vary in different areas of the knee; thus, the effect of storage on the cellular viability of the chondrocytes could also be affected.31 However, given the difficulty in accessing other types of human osteochondral tissue samples, evaluations were made only in the posterior femoral condylar area. Finally, our study evaluated only the cellular viability of chondrocytes and no other biochemical or biomechanical characteristics of the tissue. This was because of the low cellularity of the cartilage; thus, the entire sample had to be processed for flow cytometry. Although it seems relevant to know the effect of storage on other tissue properties, cellular viability has been described as the most important factor in graft survival and clinical outcomes.25,32
This study demonstrated that the storage of fresh human osteochondral allografts in a NAC-enriched medium provides greater cellular viability than when stored in a basal medium (PBS). The clinical relevance of the study is that NAC increases the window of time for the use of fresh osteochondral allografts in patients with severe cartilage injuries.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments and Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research leading to these results has received partial funding from the Chilean Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology.
Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the local ethics committee (Study-ID:2013-01).
Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.
Trial Registration: Not applicable.
References
- 1. Arøen A, Løken S, Heir S, Alvik E, Ekeland A, Granlund OG, et al. Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(1):211-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Tare RS, Howard D, Pound JC, Roach HI, Oreffo ROC. Tissue engineering strategies for cartilage generation—micromass and three-dimensional cultures using human chondrocytes and a continuous cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;333(2):609-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mankin HJ. The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(3):460-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Le TK, Montejano LB, Cao Z, Zhao Y, Ang D. Healthcare costs associated with osteoarthritis in US patients. Pain Pract. 2012;12(8):633-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Redman SN, Oldfield SF, Archer CW. Current strategies for articular cartilage repair. Eur Cell Mater. 2005;9:23-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Risbud MV, Sittinger M. Tissue engineering: advances in in vitro cartilage generation. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20(8):351-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mobasheri A, Csaki C, Clutterbuck AL, Rahmanzadeh M, Shakibaei M. Mesenchymal stem cells in connective tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: applications in cartilage repair and osteoarthritis therapy. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24(3):347-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. LaPrade RF, Botker J, Herzog M, Agel J. Refrigerated osteoarticular allografts to treat articular cartilage defects of the femoral condyles. A prospective outcomes study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(4):805-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Görtz S, Bugbee WD. Allografts in articular cartilage repair. Instr Course Lect. 2007;56:469-80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gross AE, Kim W, Las Heras F, Backstein D, Safir O, Pritzker KP. Fresh osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects: long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(8):1863-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0282-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Davidson PA, Rivenburgh DW, Dawson PE, Rozin R. Clinical, histologic, and radiographic outcomes of distal femoral resurfacing with hypothermically stored osteoarticular allografts. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1082-90. doi: 10.1177/0363546507299529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Krych AJ, Robertson CM, Williams RJ, 3rd; Cartilage Study Group. Return to athletic activity after osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(5):1053-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546511435780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Assenmacher AT, Pareek A, Reardon PJ, Macalena JA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Long-term outcomes after osteochondral allograft: a systematic review at long-term follow-up of 12.3 years. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(10):2160-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Smith B, Sigal IR, Grande DA. Immunology and cartilage regeneration. Immunol Res. 2015;63(1-3):181-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ball ST, Amiel D, Williams SK, Tontz W, Chen AC, Sah RL, et al. The effects of storage on fresh human osteochondral allografts. Clin Orthop. 2004;(418):246-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Judas F, Rosa S, Teixeira L, Lopes C, Ferreira Mendes A. Chondrocyte viability in fresh and frozen large human osteochondral allografts: effect of cryoprotective agents. Transplant Proc. 2007;39(8):2531-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Teng MS, Yuen AS, Kim HT. Enhancing osteochondral allograft viability: effects of storage media composition. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(8):1804-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0302-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Williams RJ, 3rd, Dreese JC, Chen CT. Chondrocyte survival and material properties of hypothermically stored cartilage: an evaluation of tissue used for osteochondral allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(1):132-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kim HT, Teng MS, Dang AC. Chondrocyte apoptosis: implications for osteochondral allograft transplantation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(8):1819-25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0304-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Blanco FJ, Ochs RL, Schwarz H, Lotz M. Chondrocyte apoptosis induced by nitric oxide. Am J Pathol. 1995;146(1):75-85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Nakagawa S, Arai Y, Mazda O, Kishida T, Takahashi KA, Sakao K, et al. N-acetylcysteine prevents nitric oxide-induced chondrocyte apoptosis and cartilage degeneration in an experimental model of osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2010;28(2):156-63. doi: 10.1002/jor.20976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gómez-Lechón MJ, Lahoz A, Jiménez N, Bonora A, Castell JV, Donato MT. Evaluation of drug-metabolizing and functional competence of human hepatocytes incubated under hypothermia in different media for clinical infusion. Cell Transplant. 2008;17(8):887-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Haugland RP. Molecular probes: handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals. New York, NY: Elseiver; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Nuelle CW, Nuelle JAV, Cook JL, Stannard JP. Patient factors, donor age, and graft storage duration affect osteochondral allograft outcomes in knees with or without comorbidities. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(2):179-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cook JL, Stannard JP, Stoker AM, Bozynski CC, Kuroki K, Cook CR, et al. Importance of donor chondrocyte viability for osteochondral allografts. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(5):1260-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. US Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Biological Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry: screening and testing of human tissue intended for transplantation. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pennock A, Wagner F, Robertson C, Harwood F, Bugbee W, Amiel D. Prolonged storage of osteochondral allografts: does the addition of fetal bovine serum improve chondrocyte viability? J Knee Surg. 2006;19(4):265-72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Garrity JT, Stoker AM, Sims HJ, Cook JL. Improved osteochondral allograft preservation using serum-free media at body temperature. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(11):2542-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546512458575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Qi J, Hu Z, Song H, Chen B, Xie D, Zhou L, et al. Cartilage storage at 4°C with regular culture medium replacement benefits chondrocyte viability of osteochondral grafts in vitro. Cell Tissue Bank. 2016;17(3):473-9. doi: 10.1007/s10561-016-9556-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Adkisson HD, 4th, Martin JA, Amendola RL, Milliman C, Mauch KA, Katwal AB, et al. The potential of human allogeneic juvenile chondrocytes for restoration of articular cartilage. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(7):1324-33. doi: 10.1177/0363546510361950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rogers BA, Murphy CL, Cannon SR, Briggs TWR. Topographical variation in glycosaminoglycan content in human articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(12):1670-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B12.18132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bugbee WD, Pallante-Kichura AL, Görtz S, Amiel D, Sah R. Osteochondral allograft transplantation in cartilage repair: graft storage paradigm, translational models, and clinical applications. J Orthop Res. 2016;34(1):31-8. doi: 10.1002/jor.22998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
