Abstract
A Na2HPO4-catalyzed four-component reaction between a ketone, malononitrile, S8 and formamide has been realized for the first time. This reaction provides a concise approach to thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-amines, previously requiring 5 steps. The utility of this reaction was validated by preparing a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor and an inhibitor of the NRF2 pathway with excellent atom- and step-economy.
Keywords: atom economy; multi-component reaction; thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-amines; structural diversity
Graphical Abstract

Concise synthesis of thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-amines with improved atom economy, increased step economy, enhanced structural diversity and simplified purification has been realized.
Introduction
Thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-amines (TPAs) have been discovered to possess many important bioactivities, including inhibition of hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication[1], inhibition of kinases,[2] modulation of the NRF2 anti-oxidant response pathway,[3]and inhibition of human farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (hFPPS)[4] (Figure 1). Notably, GDC-0941 is currently being evaluated as an anticancer agent in a phase II clinical trial,[2a] while GDC-0980 and SNS-314 are both being tested as anticancer agents in phase I clinical trials[2b],[2c]. In light of the biological and pharmaceutical value of TPAs, the organic synthesis community has been interested in facile syntheses of these molecules. Currently, the reported synthesis of TPAs requires 5 steps starting with malononitrile and acetyltrimethylsilane (Scheme 1, top).[4] To develop a general, straightforward method of synthesizing TPAs, we designed a one-step synthesis using a four-component reaction between ketones, malononitrile, S8 and formamide based on the Gewald reaction (Scheme 1, bottom).[5] This design is expected to improve atom economy, [6] step economy,[7] structural diversity[8] and ease of purification.
Figure 1.

Bioactive molecules bearing a thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-amine core.
Scheme 1.

The previously reported route of TPA synthesis and the presently reported route.
Results and Discussion
To test our proposed atom-economical thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-amine synthesis, we started with 1 equivalent of acetophenone (1a), 1.5 equivalents of malononitrile (2), 1.1 equivalents of S8 (3) and 12 equivalents of formamide (4). We were surprised to find that by simply heating the reaction to 170°C, even in the absence of a catalyst, we could isolate the desired product 5a in 34% yield (Table 1, Entry 1). Next, we evaluated a panel of potential catalysts including L-proline/Et2NH, Na2CO3, Na2HPO4, K2CO3, and K3PO4 (Table 1, Entries 2–6), and found Na2HPO4 as the optimal catalyst giving 5a in 85% yield (Table 1, Entry 4). Compared to other catalysts tested, Na2HPO4 is the only one that could function as both a base and an acid, which is a possible reason for its superior catalytic effects. Using Na2HPO4 as the catalyst, we next explored solvent effects (Table 1, Entries 7–10). Water, tert-butanol, sec-butanol, and isopropanol all caused a decrease in the yield of 5a. This result indicated that the reactant formamide, 4, is also an excellent solvent for the reaction. Next, in order to optimize the efficiency of the reaction, we explored the minimum amount of 4 that could be used (Table 1, Entries 4, 11–13). With 4 eq. of 4, the yield of 5a was slightly lower, but when we investigated the substrate scope with 4 eq. of 4, we found many of the substrates gave a poor yield in these conditions. When the amount of 4 dropped to 2 eq., the yield of 5a decreased from 86% to 75%, and was further reduced to 62% if 1.5 eq. of 4 was used. Therefore, 12 eq. of 4 gives the highest yield and, importantly, the greatest substrate scope. We next explored time and temperature and found the yield increased to 91% and the reaction time could be decreased from 6 hours to 0.5 hour by increasing the temperature to 200°C (Table 1, Entry 14). Further, in the presence of 10 mol% triphenylphosphine as an additive, the yield of 5a further increased to 96% (Table 1, Entry 15). But with Ph3P and no Na2HPO4, the yield dropped to 55% (Table 1, Entry 16). The presence of Ph3P possibly prevents the dimerization of 5a.[9] Overall, we chose 20 mol% Na2HPO4 as catalyst, 10 mol% Ph3P, and 200°C for 0.5 h, as the standard conditions for a survey of the substrate scope.
Table 1.
Optimization of conditions of a four-component reaction between acetophenone 1a, malononitrile 2, S8 3, and formamide 4.[a]
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Catalyst | Eq. of 4 | Solvent | T/°C | % Yield[d] |
| 1 | None | 12 | - | 170 | 34 |
| 2 | L-proline/Et2NH | 12 | - | 170 | 61 |
| 3 | Na2CO3 | 12 | - | 170 | 35 |
| 4 | Na2HPO4 | 12 | - | 170 | 85 |
| 5 | K2CO3 | 12 | - | 170 | 52 |
| 6 | K3PO4 | 12 | - | 170 | 45 |
| 7 | Na2HPO4 | 12 | H2O | 170 | 10 |
| 8 | Na2HPO4 | 12 | t-BuOH | 170 | 45 |
| 9 | Na2HPO4 | 12 | s-BuOH | 170 | 41 |
| 10 | Na2HPO4 | 12 | i-PrOH | 170 | 32 |
| 11 | Na2HPO4 | 4 | - | 170 | 84 |
| 12 | Na2HPO4 | 2 | - | 170 | 75 |
| 13 | Na2HPO4 | 1.5 | - | 170 | 62 |
| 14[b] | Na2HPO4 | 12 | - | 200 | 91 |
| 15[b], [c] | Na2HPO4 | 12 | - | 200 | 96 |
| 16[b] | PPh3 | 12 | - | 200 | 55 |
1.0 eq. ketone (1a), 1.5 eq. malononitrile (2), 1.1 eq. S8 (3), 12.0 eq. formamide (4), and 20 mol% catalyst were used for 6 hours.
0.5 hour.
10 mol% Ph3P added.
Isolated yields.
After optimizing conditions, a set of aromatic moieties at the R1 position were evaluated. Electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) gave an 81% average yield (Scheme 2, 5b and 5c). Para-halide substituents gave an 85% average yield (Scheme 2, 5d-5g). Meta- and ortho-F substituents gave 85% and 82% yields, respectively. Electron-donating groups (EDG) offered desired products in 77% average yield (Scheme 2, 5j-5m). The structure of 5l was unambiguously assigned by X-ray crystallography (Figure 2; CCDC 1904050). Heterocyclic groups including furanyl and thiophenyl generated 5n and 5o in 62% and 65% yields, respectively.
Scheme 2.

Substrate scope of a four-component reaction of ketones 1, malononitrile 2, S8 3, and formamide 4.
Figure 2.

ORTEP diagram of 5I with atomic labeling scheme. Thermal ellipsoids at a 50 % probability level are shown. CCDC 1904050.
Next, we set R1 = Phenyl, and looked at the effect of changing the R2 group. Both phenyl and methyl groups had excellent compatibility in the reaction, providing 5p and 5q with 97% and 91% yields, respectively. Finally, an alkyl group at both R1 and R2 was tested, producing 5r in 87% yield. Generally, the reaction has broad ketone substrate scope.
Scalability of an organic reaction is one of the important features when it is used by medicinal chemists and chemical process scientists.[10] We were able to scale-up the reaction to 50 mmol, furnishing 9 grams of product 5a in 79% yield after a simple work-up and recrystallization (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.

Scalable four-component reaction of acetophenone 1a, malononitrile 2, S8 3 and formamide 4.
The practicality of the reaction was demonstrated by the rapid synthesis of the NRF2 regulator AEM1 and the multi-target kinase inhibitor (MTKI; Scheme 4). AEM1 could be obtained via a conventional N-alkylation of 5c with 74% overall yield in two steps from the readily available 1c. This is the first disclosure of the synthesis of AEM1. MTKI was synthesized with a 49% overall yield in 2 steps from the inexpensive para-nitro starting material, 1i. The quick access to intermediate 5i via the four-component reaction of 1i, 2, 3, and 4 makes this route an attractive alternative to the preparation the MTKI.
Scheme 4.

Total synthesis of AEM2 and MTKI using a Na2HPO4-catalyzed four-component reaction of ketones (1c or 1i), malononitrile (2), S8 (3) and formamide (4).
Finally, we propose a possible mechanism of the four-component reaction of ketones, malononitrile, S8 and formamide (Scheme 5). The reaction is initiated by Na2HPO4 extracting the proton of 2. Then the ketone is subjected to nucleophilic attack of activated 2, leading to the formation of intermediate A. The product of a Knoevenagel reaction[11], B, is generated through the elimination of A with the help of Na2HPO4. Subsequently, Na2HPO4 activated B opens the S8 ring through nucleophilic attack to yield intermediate C. Intermediate C undergoes intramolecular addition to the cyano group to form D. Then Na2HPO4-promoted aromatization of D leads to the formation of Gewald reaction product E.[12] Condensation of E and 4 produces intermediate F which undergoes intramolecular addition to the cyano group to give G. Finally, the Na2HPO4-catalyzed tautomerization of G gives the product 5.
Scheme 5.

Proposed mechanism of the Na2HPO4-catalyzed four-component reaction of ketone, malononitrile, S8 and formamide
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed a four-component reaction between ketones, malononitrile, S8 and formamide, to prepare TPAs in 62–97% yield. This reaction provides a facile synthesis of high value intermediates with excellent atom economy, short reaction times, high structural diversity, and facile purification. In addition, the reaction could be scaled up to a multi-gram scale that did not require chromatography for purification. To demonstrate the general applicability of our four-component reaction, the reaction was applied to prepare the NRF2 regulator AEM2 and MTKI in two steps with high overall yields. In the future, the invention of this reaction is expected to accelerate the synthesis of TPA-based molecules for both drug discovery efforts and process chemistry.
Experimental Section
General procedure for the preparation of compounds 5a-r.
To a 10 mL reaction vial, was added 1.0 mmol (1.0 eq.) ketone (1a-r), 1.5 mmol (1.5 eq.) malononitrile (2), 1.1 mmol (1.1 eq.) S8 (3), 12 mmol (12.0 eq.) formamide (4), 20 mol% Na2HPO4, and 10 mol% PPh3. The mixture was heated to 200°C in a sand bath for 0.5 hour. 1 was confirmed to be consumed by TLC analysis. Then 2 mL of water was poured into the reaction mixture after it cooled to 22°C. The resulting mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (EtOAc) 3 times (5 mL EtOAc per extraction). The organic layers were combined and washed with 15 mL water. Subsequently, the organic layer was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The crude product was obtained after removing the EtOAc with vacuum rotation. Further purification was performed with flash column chromatography to afford products 5a-r as solids.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grant ES023758 to E.C. and D.D.Z.
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document
References
- [1].Bassetto M, Leyssen P, Neyts J, Yerukhimovich MM, Frick DN, Brancale A Eur. J. Med. Chem 2016, 123, 31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].a) Nováková J, Talacko P, Novák P, Vališ K Cell, 2019, 8, 191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Makker V, Recio FO, Ma L, Matulonis UA, Lauchle JO, Parmar H, Gilbert HN, Ware JA, Zhu R, Lu S Cancer 2016, 122, 3519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Cheung CH, Sarvagalla S, Lee JY, Huang YC, M. S. Coumar Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat 2014, 24, 1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Bollong MJ, Yun H, Sherwood L, Woods AK, Lairson LL,; Schultz PG ACS Chem. Biol 2015, 10, 2193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].a) Leung C-Y, Langille AM, Mancuso J, Tsantrizos YS Bioorg. Med. Chem 2013, 21, 2229; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Abdelerazek FM, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 2006, 119, 271; [Google Scholar]; c) Lacbay CM, Waller DD, Park J, Palou MG, Vincent F, Huang XF, Ta V, Berghuis AM, Sebag M, Tsantrizos YS J. Med. Chem 2018, 61, 6904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].a) Ramón DJ, Yus M, Angew. Chem 2005,117, 1628; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2005, 44, 1602; [Google Scholar]; b) Ruijter E, Scheffelaar R, Orru RVA, Angew. Chem 2011,123, 6358; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2011, 50, 6234. [Google Scholar]; c) Dömling A, Wang W, Wang K, Chem. Rev 2012, 112, 3083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Guo X, Hu W Acc. Chem. Res, 2013, 46, 2427; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Shi T, Kaneko L, Sandino M, Busse R, Zhang M, Mason D, Machulis J, Ambrose AJ, Zhang DD, Chapman E ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng, 2019, 7, 1524; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Kavitha K, Srikrishna D, Dubey PK and Aparna P J. Sulfur Chem 2019, 40, 195; [Google Scholar]; g) Abaee MS, Hadizadeh A, Mojtahedi MM, Halvagar MR Tetrahedron Lett 2017, 58, 1408; [Google Scholar]; h) Thomas J, Jana S, Sonawane M, Fiey B, Balzarini J, Liekens S, Dhaen W Org. Biomol. Chem 2017, 15, 3892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Trost BM, Angew. Chem 1995, 107, 285; [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 1995, 34, 259. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Newhouse T, Baran PS, Hoffmann RW Chem. Soc. Rev, 2009, 38, 3010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].a) Burke MD, Schreiber SL, Angew. Chem 2004,116, 48; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2004, 43, 46. [Google Scholar]; b) Kim J, Jung J, Koo J, Cho W, Lee WS, Kim C, Park W, Park SB Nat. Commun 2016, 7, 13196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Jing CC, Ying D, Qian Y, Shi T, Zhao Y, Hu W Angew. Chem 2013, 125, 9459; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52, 9289. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Barnes DM, Haight AR, Hameury T, McLaughlin MA, Mei J, Tedrowy JS, Toma JDR Tetrahedron, 2006, 62, 11311. [Google Scholar]
- [10].Stadler A, Yousefi BH, Dallinger D, Walla P, Eycken EV, Kaval N, and Kappe CO Org. Proc. Res. Dev, 2003, 7, 707. [Google Scholar]
- [11].Yadav JS, Reddy BSS, Basak AK, Visali B, Narsaiah AV, Nagaiah K, Eur. J. Org. Chem, 2004, 546.
- [12].Wang K, Kim D, Dömling A J. Comb. Chem, 2010, 12, 111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

