Skip to main content
Microbial Biotechnology logoLink to Microbial Biotechnology
. 2018 Jun 21;13(1):107–117. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13289

Pseudomonas sp. ST4 produces variety of active compounds to interfere fungal sexual mating and hyphal growth

Shiyin Liu 1,2, Fei He 1,2, Nuoqiao Lin 1,2, Yumei Chen 1,2, Zhibin Liang 1,2, Lisheng Liao 1,2, Mingfa Lv 1,2, Yufan Chen 1,2, Shaohua Chen 1,2, Jianuan Zhou 1,2,, Lian‐Hui Zhang 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6922531  PMID: 29931737

Summary

Sexual mating of compatible sporida is essential for Sporisorium scitamineum to form dikaryotic mycelia and then cause infection on sugarcane. Our previous work identified a Pseudomonas sp. ST4 from a soil sample, which showed a promising biocontrol potential by inhibiting the mating of S. scitamineum sporida and hyphal growth. In this study, we set to isolate the active compounds from Pseudomonas sp. ST4 through solid fermentation. High‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation coupling with bioassay showed that Pseudomonas sp. ST4 produced a range of antimicrobial compounds. Two of the major components were purified following acetate extraction, silica gel and HPLC separation. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) analysis identified these active compounds are 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde and indole‐3‐carbaldehyde respectively. Further analysis showed that the former compound only inhibited the hyphal growth of the fungus at a concentration of 3 mM, while the latter interfered the fungal sexual mating at a concentration of 0.6 mM and affected hyphal growth at a concentration of 2 mM. Treatment of corn plants with 3 mM indole‐3‐carbaldehyde significantly inhibited corn smut infection, with a control rate up to 94%. Further analysis of the structure and activity relationship revealed that indole has a much stronger inhibitory activity against the fungal sexual mating than indole‐3‐carbaldehyde. The results from this study provide new agents for control and prevention of the sugarcane smut disease, and the active compounds could also be used to probe the molecular mechanisms of fungal sexual mating.


4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde and indole‐3‐carbaldehyde from Pseudomonas sp. ST4 were isolated and identified, the former of which inhibited hyphal growth of Sporisorium scitamineum at a concentration of 3 mM, and the latter of which interfered the fungal sexual mating at a concentration of 0.6 mM, and affected hyphal growth at a concentration of 2 mM and has a good control efficacy against sugarcane smut.

graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g025.jpg

Introduction

Sugarcane smut disease was first reported in Natal, South Africa, in 1877 (Mcmartin, 1945), and hereafter quickly spread to countries worldwide, such as Kenya, Nigeria, Mali, Tanzania, Mauritius and Rhodesia in Africa (Bock, 1964; Waller, 1967; Msechu and Keswani, 1982; Wada, 2003; Nzioki and Jamoza, 2006; Ong'Ala et al., 2016), Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Dominican, Jamaica, Louisiana, Hawaii, Colombia in America and also Australia in 1998 (Byther et al., 1973; Comstock and Heinz, 1977; Hoy et al., 1986; Victoria et al., 1990; Tirado‐Corbalá et al., 2015). In China, smut disease greatly influences sugarcane yield and could cause a huge direct economic loss up to five billion Chinese yuan every year (Shen et al., 2013). Currently, control of the smut disease is mainly relied on breeding of resistant sugarcane varieties, which is time‐consuming and restricted by availability of resistant parental varieties and emergence of new pathovars. In addition, a range of fungicides were also evaluated against the smut fungus (Olufolaji, 1993; Wada, 2003; Bhuiyan et al., 2012), but their associated environmental toxicity and quick emergency of fungicide resistance has become a public concern.

The pathogen of sugarcane smut is Sporisorium scitamineum, which was previously named as Ustilago scitaminea (Piepenbring et al., 2002) with a life cycle similar to those of the maize pathogens Ustilago maydis and Sporisorium reilianum (Schirawski et al., 2005, 2010; Kämper et al., 2006). As a heterothallic fungus, S. scitamineum produces basidiospores of two mating types. The basidiospores can grow and proliferate to generate more basidiospores through budding, which are unable to cause infections. The basidiospores could also mate with other basidiospores of different mating type to form dikaryons and then develop into hyphae, which are able to penetrate the bud scales of the sugarcane and cause smut disease (Croft and Braithwaite, 2006; Yan et al., 2016). Investigation of mating mechanism revealed the b locus as one of the important loci for fungal sexual mating process and pathogenesis (Kämper et al., 1995; Yan et al., 2016). Apparently, the fungal sexual mating is the key for the pathogenicity of S. scitamineum, which could be a promising target for design and developing new disease control and prevention strategies. In our previous study, we have isolated a Pseudomonas sp. ST4 from vegetable rhizosphere in Shantou city, Guangdong Province, China, which showed a potent inhibitory activity against the sexual mating of S. scitamineum without killing the fungal haploid cells (Liu et al., 2017). To understand the mechanism of biocontrol, we optimized the fermentation and chromatography conditions for isolation of the active compounds that inhibit the fungal sexual mating. Our results showed that Pseudomonas sp. ST4 produced diverse active compounds, some of which might inhibit both the sexual mating and the growth of hyphae, and some could only inhibit the sexual mating or the hyphal growth. The findings from this study provide useful clues and effective agents for the prevention and control of smut disease caused by S. scitamineum.

Results

Pseudomonas sp. ST4 produces diverse antimicrobial molecules

Pseudomonas sp. ST4 displayed a potent inhibitory activity on the sexual mating of S. scitamineum, and evidence suggests that the active components are small molecules diffusible in PDA agar medium (Liu et al., 2017). Thermal stability assay showed that Pseudomonas sp. ST4 metabolites lost the antimating activity against S. scitamineum haploid cell lines MAT‐1 and MAT‐2 after treatment at 100°C for 30 min (Fig. S1), and the bioactive compounds was soluble in hydrophobic ethyl acetate other than hydrophilic butanol (Fig. S2). For large scale purification, a total of 38.82 g ethyl acetate crude extract was obtained from 20 litres of Pseudomonas sp. ST4 spent PDA medium. The ethyl acetate crude extract were then separated in batches in a silica gel column with a Butch medium pressure filter. Four fractions were obtained based on the pattern similarity in the thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis (Fig. 1A). The mating inhibitory activity of these four fractions were tested, and the results showed that the most active fraction was ST4‐3 according to the distance of inhibition zone, which was followed by fractions ST4‐2 and ST4‐1, while no inhibitory activity could be detected in fraction ST4‐4. Despite the fraction ST4‐3 was the most active in the mating inhibition assay, we failed to obtain any pure compound with antimicrobial activity from this fraction owing to its polarity. Considering that fraction ST4‐2 had reasonable antimating activity with moderate polarity and relatively simpler molecular pattern according to TLC assay (Fig. 1), this fraction about 2000 mg solid mixture was selected for subsequent HPLC purification. The results of semi‐preparative reversed‐phase HPLC showed that fraction ST4‐2 contained at least over two dozens of molecules according to the UV absorption peaks at OD220 (Fig. 2A). Based on the HPLC profile, nine fractions were collected, including ST4‐2‐1 (0–8.6 min, 74.4 mg), ST4‐2‐2 (8.6–9.4 min, 18.6 mg), ST4‐2‐3 (9.4–10.0 min, 35.7 mg), ST4‐2‐4 (10.0–11.5 min, 6.6 mg), ST4‐2‐5 (11.5–18.6 min, 37.0 mg), ST4‐2‐6 (18.6–20.0 min, 9.1 mg), ST4‐2‐7 (20.0–23.4 min, 36.8 mg), ST4‐2‐8 (23.4–24.5 min, 6.9 mg), and ST4‐2‐9 (24.5–40.0 min, 307.5 mg) (Fig. 2A). Among them, both fractions ST4‐2‐6 and ST4‐2‐8 showed only a single peak with retention times at 19.241 and 23.590 min respectively (Fig. 2A), and a pure band on the TLC plate (Fig. 2B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Analyses of TLC and antimating activity of fractions ST4‐1 to ST4‐4.

A. After separation by silica gel column and medium pressure separator, 0.5 μl of each fraction (dissolved in MeOH in a concentration of 50 mg ml−1) was spotted on a aluminium plate using capillaries, which was developed by a solution of CHCl3/MeOH (9:1 v/v), and dyed by 10% C4H10O4S colour agent. Four fractions were obtained based on the pattern similarity in the thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis.

B. Mixture of MAT‐1 and MAT‐2 (0.5 μl of OD 600 ≈ 1.5) was spotted on PDA slices progressively and tablet (5 mm diameter) absorbed each fraction was placed on the end of the PDA slice for antimating bioassay. The bioassay plate was incubated at 28°C for 2 days until white hypha appeared on the MeOH control (CK). Results showed that the most active fraction was ST4‐3 according to the hyphal growth inhibition distance (in horizontal white line), which was followed by fractions ST4‐2 and ST4‐1, while no inhibitory activity could be detected in fraction ST4‐4.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Analyses of HPLC, TLC and antimating activity of fractions ST4‐2‐1 to ST4‐2‐9. (A) The UV absorbance (λ = 254 nm) profile of the HPLC fractions of the active components after silica gel column and medium pressure separation.

B. TLC analysis of each ST4‐2 fractions after HPLC separation.

C. Antimating bioassay of each ST4‐2 fractions. CK, no tablet absorbed in any ST4‐2 fraction was placed on the end of the PDA slice. Bioassay results showed that fractions ST4‐2‐4 and ST4‐2‐6 had strongest inhibitory activities against the hyphal growth, fraction ST4‐2‐7 restrained the sexual mating with little inhibitory activity on the hyphal growth, and fraction ST4‐2‐8 could inhibit both sexual mating and the hyphal growth.

Bioassay results showed that most HPLC fractions from ST4‐2 displayed antagonistic activity against the hyphal growth or sexual mating of S. scitamineum. Among them, Fractions ST4‐2‐4 and ST4‐2‐6 had strongest inhibitory activities against the hyphal growth with no colonies appeared near the fraction samples; fraction ST4‐2‐7 blocked the sexual mating with little inhibitory activity on the hyphal growth; whereas fraction ST4‐2‐8 inhibited both sexual mating and the hyphal growth (Fig. 2C).

Structural characterization of the compounds in fractions ST4‐2‐6 and ST4‐2‐8

Fractions ST4‐2‐6 and ST4‐2‐8, which appeared pure in HPLC and TLC analyses, were characterized by NMR and mass spectrometry. 1H and 13C NMR spectra revealed that Fraction ST4‐2‐6 contains a benzene ring, with a hydroxyl group at α site and an aldehyde group at δ site (Fig. S4A and B). LC‐MS analysis of the compound showed a molecular weight of 122.12, identical to that of 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde. HPLC analysis showed that the retention time of fraction ST4‐2‐6 was at 5.9 min, which was identical to that of the commercial 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde (Fig. 3A). The above data indicate that the single peak in fraction ST4‐2‐6 is 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

HPLC analysis of fractions ST4‐2‐6 (A) and ST4‐2‐8 (B).

A. The retention time of Fr. ST4‐2‐6 is 5.9 min (top), the same as that of the standard sample of 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde (bottom).

B. The retention time of Fr. ST4‐2‐8 is 8.255 min (top), the same as that of the standard sample of indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde (bottom).

For fraction ST4‐2‐8, 1H and 13C NMR spectra predicted a molecular formula of C9H7NO, containing a benzopyrrole ring with an aldehyde group at γ site (Fig. S4C and D). LC‐MS analysis showed that the compound has a molecular weight of 146.15. Together, the NMR and mass spectrometry data indicate that the compound in fraction ST4‐2‐8 is indole‐3‐carbaldehyde, which was further confirmed by HPLC analysis showing the same retention time at 8.255 min of fraction ST4‐2‐8 and commercial indole‐3‐carbaldehyde (Fig. 3B).

Indole‐3‐carbaldehyde inhibits the fungal sexual mating and fungal growth in a concentration‐dependent manner

The antimating and fungicidal activities of 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde and indole‐3‐carbaldehyde were determined using the mixture of S. scitamineum haploid cell lines. The bioassay results showed that at a final concentration of < 1 mM, 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde had no effect on the hyphal growth or sexual mating, at the concentration of 2 mM, the hyphal growth was retarded compared with that of the negative control, and at the concentration of 3 mM and above, the compound inhibited the fungal growth completely (Fig. 4A), indicating that 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde has no antimating activity. In contrast, indole‐3‐carbaldehyde was able to interfere the fungal mating in a concentration range from 0.5 mM to 1 mM and inhibit the fungal growth at 2 mM (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Inhibitory effects of 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde (top) and indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde (bottom) on the sexual mating and hyphal growth of S. scitamineum. CK, PDA medium supplemented with MeOH. Results showed that 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde has no antimating activity but can influence the hyphal growth at the concentration of 2 mM and above; indole‐3‐carbaldehyde can interfere the fungal mating ranging from 0.5 mM to 1 mM and inhibit the fungal growth at 2 mM.

Indole‐3‐carbaldehyde provides effective control on corn smut

Similar to the sugarcane pathogen S. scitamineum, Ustilago maydis, which is the causal agent of the corn smut disease, also requires a sexual mating process to develop from non‐pathogenic haploid cells to pathogenic diploid filaments. Importantly, Pseudomonas sp. ST4 also showed a strong inhibitory effect on the mating of the haploid cell lines Umn9 and Umn10 of U. maydis, and 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde and indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde displayed a similar inhibitory effect on the hyphal growth or sexual mating of U. maydis as against the sugarcane pathogen (Fig. S3). To test the disease control efficiency of 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde and indole‐3‐carbaldehyde, we used the corn seedlings infected with U. maydis instead of the sugarcane plants infected with S. scitamineum, as the disease cycle of the former is greatly shorter (about 20 days) than the latter (about 7–8 months). Results showed that all the seedlings treated with U. maydis developed disease symptoms rapidly with typical white deformed tumours grew at the infection sites, which progressively turned into black and even burst out from leaf sheaths (Fig. 5, Table 1). Treatment of U. maydis infected corn seedlings using Pseudomonas sp. ST4 slightly reduced the disease occurrence, with a disease incidence at about 89%. However, similar to the case of sugarcane trials (Liu et al., 2017), when Pseudomonas sp. ST4 grew and inoculated with 2% glucose, its biocontrol efficiency was greatly increased with a disease incidence reduced to only about 15% (Table 1). When treated with 3 mM 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde, all the seedlings showed disease symptoms but the tumours were smaller than the untreated control (Fig. 5). Significantly, indole‐3‐carbaldehyde has a high disease control efficiency, with < 6% of the seedlings showing small tumours at the infection sites when the compound was added at a final concentration of 3 mM (Table 1).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Control effects of Pseudomonas sp. ST4, 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde and indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde on corn smut disease. Every 20 seedlings were injected with 500 μl of inoculums of Umn9 and Umn10 mixture containing 3 mM 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde (A), Umn9 and Umn10 mixture containing 3 mM indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde (B), Pseudomonas sp. ST4 culture (OD 600 = 0.5) containing 2% glucose (C), Pseudomonas sp. ST4 culture (OD 600 = 0.5) (D), YEPS medium (E), and Umn9 and Umn10 cell mixture (F) respectively. All the seedlings were kept outdoor for 7–10 days, and disease incidence was measured. The trial was conducted twice. Results showed that 3 mM 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde has few disease control efficiency (A), and indole‐3‐carbaldehyde at the same concentration has a good efficiency on controlling smut disease occurrence (B).

Table 1.

Control efficiency of strain ST4 and its metabolites on corn smut disease

Corn smut
Treatment Seedling number (diseased/alla) Incidence (%) Control efficiencyb (%)
YEPS medium (negative control) 0/40 0.00
U. maydis (positive control) 40/40 100
ST4 + U. maydis 32/36 88.89 11.11
ST4 + U. maydis+2% glucose 6/39 15.38 84.62
U. maydis+3 mM 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde 40/40 100 0
U. maydis+3 mM indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde 2/36 5.56 94.44
a

The total number of seedlings for every treatment is 40; several seedlings were naturally dead before measurement, which were not calculated for data statistics.

b

Control efficiency (%) = (Incidencepositive control‐Incidencetreatment) ×100/Incidencepositive control.

Evaluation of the antimating activity of indole‐3‐carbaldehyde derivatives

Various derivatives containing indole group or carbaldehyde moiety were purchased, and their antimating activity against S. scitamineum were determined. Results showed that at a low concentration of 0.2 mM, indole displayed a promising activity in inhibition of the sexual mating of S. scitamineum, which is about threefold lower than the effective concentration of indole‐3‐carbaldehyde under the same assay conditions. Noticeably, indole did not affect sporida growth even at a high concentration up to 0.8 mM (Table 2). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of most derivatives is about 0.6 mM except indole‐4‐carbaldehyde (Table 2). For the derivatives with group substituted the carbaldehyde base at γ site, the more complicate the group, the weaker the inhibitory activity, and vice versa, the inhibitory activity of the reduced methanol base is stronger than that of the oxidized formic acid base. Substitution of the bases at other positions of indole group to indole 3‐carbaldehyde could increase the inhibitory effect against the hyphal growth.

Table 2.

Inhibitory effects of indole and its derivatives on S. scitamineum

0.2 mM 0.4 mM 0.6 mM 0.8 mM MIC (mM)
Structure Chemical density Mating Growth Mating Growth Mating Growth Mating Growth Mating Growth
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g006.jpg Indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde (+) (+) 0.6 3
Inline graphic; Indole (+) + + + 0.2 NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g008.jpg 1‐methylindole‐3‐carbaldehyde + + + + + 0.8 0.2
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g009.jpg 3‐cyanoindole (+) (+) (+) + + + + 0.4 0.2
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g010.jpg Indole‐3‐carboxylic acid (+) 0.8 NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g011.jpg 3‐methyl indole (+) + + + + 0.2 0.8
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g012.jpg 3‐indole acetonitrile (+) (+) NIA 0.6
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g013.jpg 3‐indole butyric acid (+) 0.8 NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g014.jpg 3‐indole methanol (+) + + + + 0.6 0.4
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g015.jpg Tryptamine NIA NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g016.jpg Indole‐4‐carbaldehyde NIA NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g017.jpg Indole‐2‐carbaldehyde (+) (+) 0.6 NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g018.jpg Indole‐5‐carbaldehyde (+) (+) (+) (+) 0.2 NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g019.jpg Indole‐6‐carbaldehyde + + 0.6 NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g020.jpg Indole‐7‐carbaldehyde + + + 0.4 NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g021.jpg 5‐chloroindole‐3‐carbaldehyde (+) + + + + + + 0.4 0.2
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g022.jpg 3,3′‐methylene indole (+) (+) (+) NIA 0.2
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g023.jpg Indole acetic acid NIA NIA
graphic file with name MBT2-13-107-g024.jpg Tryptophan NIA NIA

Data were recorded 3 days after incubation. Symbol: +, inhibition; (+), partial inhibition; −, no inhibition; NIA, no inhibitory activity even at the highest concentration used in this study.

Discussion

Antagonistic microbes usually produce inhibitory compounds or even enzymes to interfere with pathogen growth or signal transduction (Dong et al., 2004; Hayat et al., 2012). Our previous study has revealed that Pseudomonas sp. ST4 could produce active compounds to affect the hyphal growth and sexual mating of basidiospores of S. scitamineum (Liu et al., 2017). In this study, we purified two active compounds from the metabolites produced by Pseudomonas sp. ST4, which were identified respectively as 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde and indole‐3‐carbaldehyde using NMR and mass spectrometry. The former inhibited the fungal hyphal growth at a concentration of 3 mM, and the latter interfered with the sexual mating at a concentration from 0.6 mM and the fungal growth at 2 mM (Table 2, Fig. 4). Pot trial against corn smut disease showed that indole‐3‐carbaldehyde could significantly reduce the disease incidence with about 94% control efficiency (Fig. 5, Table 1). This promising results of indole‐3‐carbaldehyde in antimating and disease control prompted us to screen for its derivatives with higher potency than the compound. Results led to identify indole as the most effective compound against the sexual mating of S. scitamineum with a MIC of 0.2 mM without any visible effect on the hyphal growth (Table 2). The findings suggest that indole group is critical for the antimating activity. In contrast, the position of carbaldehyde base on indole group appeared not so important. Any substitution at 3 or 4 or 6 position of indole would cause a substantial reduction in inhibitory activity (Table 2). The information would be useful for further design and optimization of inhibitors and for developing molecular probes to investigate the molecular mechanisms of inhibition.

Indole is widely found in nature, with numerous derivatives, in which, tryptophan is one of the essential amino acids, and IAA is a plant hormone. In addition, indole has also been widely used as a precursor or lead compound in the development of antibiotics or fungicides. Indole derivatives were shown to have potent antifungal or antibacterial activities. For example, 5‐nitro‐3‐formylindole exhibited a strong inhibitory activity on the growth of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Chen et al., 2016). Trichoderma produces indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde that induces camalexin (3‐thiazol‐2′‐yl‐indole) accumulation in Arabidopsis to resist the infection of Botrytis cinerea (Contreras‐Cornejo et al., 2011). In this study, we found that a soil bacterium Pseudomonas sp. ST4 also produced indole‐3‐carbaldehyde, which inhibited the sexual mating of S. scitamineum and U. maydis. Identification of indole and indole‐3‐carbaldehyde as antimating inhibitors in this study further expands the list of the biological functions and potential applications of indole derivatives.

Among the various structural derivatives of indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde tested in this study, three compounds, i.e., indole, 3‐methyl indole and indole‐5‐carboxaldehyde, showed antimating activity at a low concentration of 0.2 mM (Table 2). Indole and indole‐5‐carboxaldehyde did not show any cell toxicity against the fungal growth even at a concentration of 0.8 mM, whereas the compound 3‐methyl indole shared a similar antimating activity spectrum as indole except the cell toxicity at 0.8 mM. The properties of low cell toxicity and strong antimating potency of indole are highly valuable for developing environmental friendly anti‐infection agents. The molecular mechanism with which indole interferes with the fungal sexual mating especially the b locus expression remains to be determined. In this context, it is interesting to note that indole was found to inhibit bacterial quorum sensing (QS) signal transmission by interfering with the folding of a QS regulator (Kim and Park, 2013).

In summary, the findings from this study provide a molecular base with which Pseudomonas sp. ST4 interferes with the sexual mating of fungal pathogens S. scitamineum and U. maydis. In addition, identification of indole as a key functional group may aid our efforts for further investigation of molecular mechanisms by which fungal pathogens modulating the process of sexual mating, and for further design and developing novel anti‐infection reagents. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that Pseudomonas sp. ST4 produced multiple antimating and fungicide‐like molecules, which suggests that much more efforts are required for fully exploration and deep mining of potentially important bioactive molecules and valuable genetic resources from this interesting bacterial organism.

Experimental procedures

Strains and culture conditions

Pseudomonas sp. ST4 (deposited in the China Center for Type Culture Collection, CCTCC No: M2015526) was grown in Luria–Bertani (LB; per litre contains 5 g yeast extract, 10 g peptone and 10 g NaCl) broth or on potato dextrose agar (PDA, per litre contains 200 g potato, 20 g glucose and 18 g agar) plates for bioassay of bacterial antagonistic activity against fungal mating (Liu et al., 2017), unless otherwise indicated. S. scitamineum haploid cell lines MAT‐1 and MAT‐2, and Ustilago maydis haploid cell lines Umn9 and Umn10, were grown and maintained in YEPS medium (per litre contains 10 g yeast extract, 20 g peptone and 20 g sucrose) at 28°C or on solid medium containing 1.8% (wt/vol) agar (Yan et al., 2016).

Thermal stability assessment of the Pseudomonas sp. ST4 active metabolites

Overnight bacterial culture of Pseudomonas sp. ST4 in LB broth was streaked in grid separated by 4 cm on PDA plates (13 × 13 cm) and incubated at 28°C for 48 h. Medium covered with ST4 cell lines was cut off and the remaining was collected and melted under 60°C, 20 ml of which was poured into a new petri dish (9 cm in diameter) for positive control. Another 20 ml was continuously melted under 100°C for 30 min and poured into another petri dish. After solidification, a mixture of S. scitamineum haploid cells MAT‐1 and MAT‐2 was spotted (0.5 μl of OD600 ≈ 1.5) on the plate. The mixture spotted on a fresh PDA plate was used as a negative control. All the plates were incubated at 28°C for 2 days until white hypha appeared on the negative control plate. The experiment was repeated in triplicates.

Extraction of the active compounds from strain ST4

Overnight Pseudomonas sp. ST4 culture was spread on PDA plates (13 × 13 cm) and incubated at 28°C for 48 h, and bacterial cells were wiped off using sterilized gauze. Medium agar was chopped into small pieces and extracted 3 times with 3 volumes of EtOAc/MeOH/C2H4O2 (80: 15: 5) mixture for 2 h with constant shaking. Supernatants were collected and pooled together, and the organic solvents were removed using a rotary evaporator. Residues were then extracted 3 times with 3 volumes of MeOH, and the aqueous and organic phases were collected separately. The organic phase was evaporated to dryness under 45°C and weighted, a small amount of which was taken and dissolved in MeOH at a final concentration of 50 mg ml−1 for detection of antimating activity. The aqueous phase was then extracted 3 times with 3 volumes of C4H10O and the aqueous and C4H10O phases were collected separately. The C4H10O phase was evaporated to dryness and weighted, and dissolved in MeOH at a final concentration of 50 mg ml−1 for detection of antimating activity.

Antimating activity bioassay

Haploid cell lines MAT‐1 and MAT‐2 were used for bioassay of the inhibitory activity of bacterial extracts or chemical compounds against the mating of the S. scitamineum. PDA plates were cut into separated slices (0.6 × 6 cm), and filter paper was cut into tablets of 6 × 6 mm in size and sterilized. A tablet was immersed into 100 μl of crude extract, and after drying, placed onto one end of the agar slice, and then, the mixture of cell lines MAT‐1 and MAT‐2 (0.5 μl of OD600 ≈ 1.5) was spotted on the slice at progressively further distances from the tablet. Tablet absorbed MeOH was assayed in the same way as a negative control. The plates were incubated at 28°C for 48 h until white hypha in the negative control grew to reach the edges of the slice. The bioassay was repeated for at least three times with triplicates.

Separation and purification of the active compounds from Pseudomonas sp. ST4

Five grams of Pseudomonas sp. ST4 EtOAc extract was dissolved completely in suitable amount of MeOH, which were then mixed with 10 g of 60–100 mesh silica gels, stirred completely and air‐dried to remove extra MeOH. After that, these sample containing silica gels were added to a column, which was then connected to the Claricep Flash Silica (CS) standard silica gel column (Agela) in a Butch medium pressure filter. The sample was separated using gradient eluents of CHCl3:MeOH at a ratio of 100:0, 99:1, 98:2, 95:5, 90:10, 80:20 and 0:100 for 10 min at each gradient respectively (18 psi, 30 ml min−1 flow rate), to give seven elute fractions, which were combined into four fractions (Fr. ST4‐1 to Fr. ST4‐4) based on the pattern similarity in the thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis (elution solvents, CHCl3:MeOH = 9:1; colour agent, 10% C4H10O4S) and the results of antimating bioassay. The collected fractions were evaporated to dryness and dissolved in MeOH at a final concentration of 50 mg ml−1 for bioassay of antimating activity as described above. Among the four fractions, Fr. ST4‐2 (732.8 mg) showed the strongest activity on inhibition of fungal mating. This fraction was thus further purified by semi‐preparative reversed‐phase HPLC by dissolving the residues in MeOH at a concentration of 100 mg ml−1. An aliquot of sample (100 μl) was injected, and eluted at a speed of 3 ml min−1 with a gradient solvent programme (CH3CN in H2O, 5–100%) for 30 min; then flushed with 100% CH3CN, followed by balancing the C18 semi‐preparative column (Phenomenex) for 5 min using 5% CH3CN. Elution peaks were monitored by a UV detector at OD220. Fractions were collected, vacuum dried, and dissolved in 5% MeOH for HPLC and TLC analysis, and for bioassay of antimating activity. The purified single peaks with antimating activity were vacuum dried and dissolved in MeOH or CD3OD for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry analyses.

NMR and HRESIMS analyses

The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were obtained at 600 MHz (Bruker Avance III 600). High‐resolution electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (HRESIMS) analysis was performed with a Bruker maXis impact.

Determination of antimating activity of purified compounds and synthetic chemicals

The pure compounds 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde, indole‐3‐carbaldehyde and other derivatives were purchased from a commercial company (Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology), and 100 mM of stock solutions was prepared in MeOH. Bioassay was conducted in a 24‐well plate with each well containing 1 ml PDA medium supplemented with a purified or purchased compound at various final concentrations as indicated. PDA medium supplemented with MeOH was used as a negative control. The mixture of MAT‐1 and MAT‐2 cells (0.5 μl at OD600 ≈ 1.5) was spotted onto the well after medium solidification. Plates were incubated at 28°C for 2 days until white hypha appeared on the negative control wells. The experiment was repeated for at least twice in triplicates.

Pot trial of chemicals and Pseudomonas sp. ST4 on control of corn smut disease

Corn seeds were soaked in water for 24 h and grown in pots for 14 days till seedlings reaching about 15 cm in height. The fresh cultures of the haploid cell lines Umn9 and Umn10 of U. maydis and Pseudomonas sp. ST4 were prepared by inoculation of corresponding fungal or bacterial cell in YEPS medium, respectively, and grown overnight. The fungal and bacterial inocula were prepared by diluting the corresponding overnight cultures with the same medium to OD600 = 1.0 and OD600 = 0.5 respectively. Inoculation of corn seedlings was performed following the method described previously (Yan et al., 2016). Briefly, corn seedlings were inoculated with 500 μl of Umn9 and Umn10 cell mixture; Umn9 and Umn10 mixture with 4‐hydroxybenzaldehyde (3 mM, final concentration); Umn9 and Umn10 mixture with indole‐3‐carbaldehyde (3 mM, final concentration), Pseudomonas sp. ST4 culture and Pseudomonas sp. ST4 culture supplemented with 2% glucose respectively. The seedlings were kept outdoor for about 10 days before measurement of the disease incidence. The trial was conducted twice, and each treatment contains 20 seedlings of similar height.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Supporting information

Fig. S1. Thermal stability of Pseudomonas sp. ST4 metabolites.

Fig. S2. Inhibitory effect of different crude extracts from strain ST4 on the sexual mating of MAT‐1 and MAT‐2.

Fig. S3. Bioassay with strain ST4 and its two active metabolic compounds on the sexual mating and hyphal growth of U. maydis.

Fig. S4. NMR analyses of fractions ST4‐2‐6 and ST4‐2‐8.

Data S1.Chromatogram of Fractions ST4‐1∼ST4‐3 with antifungal activity from C18 analytical column (Phenomenex) after the silica gel column separation.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Basic Research and Development Program (973 Program, grant number 2015CB150600). We thank Prof. Zide Jiang in South China Agricultural University to provide us fungal lines Umn9 and Umn10 of U. maydis. We also thank Dr. Meixin Yan for the technical guidance during corn inoculation.

Microbial Biotechnology (2020) 13(1), 107–117

Funding Information This work was supported by the National Basic Research and Development Program (973 Program, grant number 2015CB150600).

Contributor Information

Jianuan Zhou, Email: jianuanzhou@scau.edu.cn.

Lian‐Hui Zhang, Email: lhzhang01@scau.edu.cn.

References

  1. Bhuiyan, S.A. , Croft, B.J. , James, R.S. , and Cox, M.C. (2012) Laboratory and field evaluation of fungicides for the management of sugarcane smut caused by Sporisorium scitamineum in seedcane. Australas Plant Pathol 41: 591–599. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bock, K.R. (1964) Studies on sugar‐cane smut (Ustilago scitaminea) in Kenya. Trans Br Mycol Soc 47: 403–417. [Google Scholar]
  3. Byther, R.S. , Steiner, G.W. , Ladd, S.L. , and Heinz, D.J. (1973) Smut disease of sugarcane in Hawaii. Plant Dis Rep 57: 966–968. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, G.Q. , Che, Z.P. , Tian, Y.E. , Liu, S.M. , Xu, J.Q. , Cui, L.K. , et al (2016) Antifungal activities of substituted indole‐3‐carboxaldehyde derivatives. Modern Agrochem 15: 12–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Comstock, J.C. , and Heinz, D.J. (1977) New race of culmicolous smut of sugarcane in Hawaii. Sugarcane Pathologists Newsletter 19: 24–25. [Google Scholar]
  6. Contreras‐Cornejo, H.A. , Macías‐Rodríguez, L. , Beltrán‐Peña, E. , Herrera‐Estrella, A. , and López‐Bucio, J. (2011) Trichoderma‐induced plant immunity likely involves both hormonal‐ and camalexin‐dependent mechanisms in Arabidopsis thaliana and confers resistance against necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea . Plant Signal Behav 6: 1554–1563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Croft, B.J. , and Braithwaite, K.S. (2006) Management of an incursion of sugarcane smut in Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 35: 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong, Y.H. , Zhang, X.F. , Xu, J.L. , and Zhang, L.H. (2004) Insecticidal Bacillus thuringiensis silences Erwinia carotovora virulence by a new form of microbial antagonism – signal interference. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 954–960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayat, R. , Ahmed, I. and Sheirdil, R.A. (2012) An overview of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for sustainable agriculture In Crop Production for Agricultural Improvement. Ashraf M., Öztürk M., Ahmad M. S. A., and Aksoy A. (eds). New York, NY: Springer, pp. 557–579. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoy, J.W. , Hollier, C.A. , Fontenot, D.B. , and Grelen, L.B. (1986) Incidence of sugarcane smut in Louisiana and its effect on yield. Plant Dis 70: 59–60. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kämper, J. , Reichmann, M. , Romeis, T. , Bölker, M. , and Kahmann, R. (1995) Multiallelic recognition: nonself‐dependent dimerization of the bE and bW homeodomain proteins in Ustilago maydis . Cell 81: 73–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kämper, J. , Kahmann, R. , Bölker, M. , Ma, L.J. , Brefort, T. , Saville, B.J. , et al (2006) Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis . Nature 444: 97–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, J. , and Park, W. (2013) Indole inhibits bacterial quorum sensing signal transmission by interfering with quorum sensing regulator folding. Microbiology (United Kingdom) 159: 2616–2625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, S.Y. , Lin, N.Q. , Chen, Y.M. , Liang, Z.B. , Liao, L.S. , Lv, M.F. , et al (2017) Biocontrol of sugarcane smut disease by interference of fungal sexual mating and hyphal growth using a bacterial isolate. Front Microbiol 8: 778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mcmartin, A. (1945) Sugar‐cane smut: reappearance in Natal. South African Sugar Journal 29: 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  16. Msechu, Z.E. , and Keswani, C.L. (1982) Effect of sugar‐cane smut on yield and yield components of sugar‐cane varieties in Tanzania. Tropical Agriculture 3: 243–248. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nzioki, H.S. , and Jamoza, J.E. (2006) Assessment of yield loss due to sugarcane smut (Ustilago scitaminea) infection in Kenya. Biophys J 104: 394a. [Google Scholar]
  18. Olufolaji, D.B. (1993) Evaluation of some relatively new fungicides for smut control in sugar‐cane. Crop Prot 12: 293–295. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ong'Ala, J. , Mulianga, B. , Wawire, N. , Riungu, G. and Mwanga, D. (2016) Determinants of sugarcane smut prevalence in the Kenya Sugar Industry. Int J Agric Innov Res 1, 153–157. [Google Scholar]
  20. Piepenbring, M. , Stoll, M. , and Oberwinkler, F. (2002) The generic position of Ustilago maydis, Ustilago scitaminea, and Ustilago esculenta (Ustilaginales). Mycol Prog 1: 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schirawski, J. , Heinze, B. , Wagenknecht, M. , and Kahmann, R. (2005) Mating type loci of Sporisorium reilianum: novel pattern with three a and multiple b specificities. Eukaryot Cell 4: 1317–1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schirawski, J. , Mannhaupt, G. , Münch, K. , Brefort, T. , Schipper, K. , Doehlemann, G. , et al (2010) Pathogenicity determinants in smut fungi revealed by genome comparison. Science 330: 1546–1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shen, W.K. , Jiang, Z.D. , Deng, H.H. , and Liu, R. (2013) Research progress on sugarcane smut disease and Sporisorium scitamineum . Chin J Trop Crop 34: 2063–2068. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tirado‐Corbalá, R. , Anderson, R.G. , Wang, D. , and Ayars, J.E. (2015) Soil carbon and nitrogen stocks of different Hawaiian sugarcane cultivars. Agronomy 5: 239–261. [Google Scholar]
  25. Victoria, K.J.I. , Amaya, E.A. and Cassalett, D.C. (1990) Importance of sugar cane smut and control strategy in Colombia. Sugar Cane 1‐6.
  26. Wada, A.C. (2003) Control of sugarcane smut disease in Nigeria with fungicides. Crop Prot 22: 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  27. Waller, J.M. (1967) Varietal resistance to sugar cane smut in Kenya. East Afr Agricult For J 32, 399–403. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yan, M.X. , Zhu, G.N. , Lin, S.Y. , Xian, X.Y. , Chang, C.Q. , Xi, P.G. , et al (2016) The mating‐type locus b of the sugarcane smut Sporisorium scitamineum is essential for mating, filamentous growth and pathogenicity. Fungal Genet Biol 86: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1. Thermal stability of Pseudomonas sp. ST4 metabolites.

Fig. S2. Inhibitory effect of different crude extracts from strain ST4 on the sexual mating of MAT‐1 and MAT‐2.

Fig. S3. Bioassay with strain ST4 and its two active metabolic compounds on the sexual mating and hyphal growth of U. maydis.

Fig. S4. NMR analyses of fractions ST4‐2‐6 and ST4‐2‐8.

Data S1.Chromatogram of Fractions ST4‐1∼ST4‐3 with antifungal activity from C18 analytical column (Phenomenex) after the silica gel column separation.


Articles from Microbial Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES