Abstract
This study assessed the effects of two hormones, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), on ovulatory responses during different diestrous stages in lactating dairy cows. Estrous cycles of 21 cows were synchronized and were enrolled in stage 1 of the experiment. The cows were treated with a prostaglandin (PG) F2α analog either 9 to 10 days [mid-diestrus (MD) group] or 5.5 to 6.5 days [early-diestrus (ED) group] after synchronized ovulation (day 0 = first PGF2α administration). On day 2, the cows were administrated 250 μg GnRH or 3000 IU hCG. Ovulation was determined every 2 h from 24 to 36 h after GnRH or hCG administration, and then every 4 h up to 72 h until ovulation. Cows in stage 2 were administered these treatments in the reverse order. The results indicated that average ovulation times in cows treated with GnRH in the MD group (GnRH-MD group) and cows treated with GnRH in the ED group (GnRH-ED group) were 30.0 ± 1.0 h and 28.8 ± 0.4 h, respectively. However, ovulation times for cows treated with hCG in the MD group (hCG-MD group) and cows treated with hCG in the ED group (hCG-ED group) were 35.8 ± 4.6 h and 32.8 ± 2.2 h, respectively, and ovulation occurred significantly later in the hCG-treated groups than in the GnRH-treated groups. In summary, we found that hCG-induced ovulation occurred later than GnRH-induced ovulation regardless of different diestrous peroids; however, the two treatments did not differ in terms of percentage of ovulation.
Keywords: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), Ovulation time
Ovulation synchronization protocols, such as Ovsynch, comprise two doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and one dose of prostaglandin (PG) F2α [1]. The use of GnRH induces a luteinizing hormone (LH) surge [2], resulting in ovulation at 26 to 32 h [1], with most cows ovulating between 28 and 30 h following GnRH administration [3, 4].
By binding directly to LH receptors [5, 6], human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) can induce ovulation and can exert a luteotropic effect [7]. Additionally, unlike GnRH-induced ovulation by LH, which is affected by the negative feedback of systemic progesterone (P4) concentration [3, 8, 9], ovulation is induced by hCG independent of the pituitary gland. Some researchers have tried to overcome restricted pregnancy rates by using hCG. In studies that have utilized synchronization protocols, substitution of the first GnRH dose of Pre-Ovsynch [5] and Ovsynch [10], and the second GnRH dose of Ovsynch with hCG [11, 12] has been reported. Generally, administration of hCG is associated with an increase in the percentage of ovulation when compared with GnRH administration; however, similar percentages of ovulation were found when P4 concentration was lower than 1 ng/ml. Nevertheless, an improvement in synchronization and conception rates in cows was not observed following treatment with hCG. In contrast, researchers have speculated that increased P4 concentration after artificial insemination could improve conception rates. In most cows receiving hCG after insemination, the development of a second corpus luteum (CL) was achieved, which was accompanied by elevated P4 concentrations [13, 14]; however, improved conception rates in cows were observed in some [13, 15, 16] but not in all the trials [17, 18]. It has been reported that the interval between GnRH and artificial insemination influences pregnancy rate [19]; hence, we sought to determine the time of ovulation in cows after ovulation-inducing drug administration. To the best of our knowledge, earlier studies have focused on the percentage of ovulation after hCG treatment, disregarding the time interval between the hCG injection and occurrence of ovulation. Reducing the period between calving and the first insemination is important in the dairy industry. Our previous studies had focused on the practicability of the protocol (two low doses of PGF2α with or without GnRH) during mid-diestrus [4, 20]; however, the benefit of using this protocol during early-diestrus is still unclear.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of hCG on ovulatory responses during mid- and early-diestrus. We hypothesized that hCG-induced ovulation would occur earlier than GnRH-induced ovulation, but the percentage of ovulation would be similar regardless of the different diestrous periods.
Materials and Methods
Animals and management
This study, comprising about 60 Holstein cattle, was conducted on a dairy farm at the National Chung Hsing University (subtropical Taiwan) between August 2017 and April 2018. All the cows were housed in groups in free-stall barns with a slatted floor and equipped with free-stall bed mats, overhead fans, and a sprinkler system. Access to an outdoor shaded exercise yard was also available. Lactating dairy cows were fed with a total mixed ration (TMR) twice daily ad libitum. The diet (TMR) consisted of approximately 58% hay (Bermuda and alfalfa) and 42% concentrate (commercial milking cow concentrate, steam-flaked corn, and wheat bran), which was mixed with minerals (dicalcium phosphate and magnesium oxide) and vitamin E. Fresh water was provided ad libitum. All lactating dairy cows were milked twice daily, and the average daily milk yield was 25 kg per cow. During the experimental period, temperature and humidity were recorded at 0600 h, 1200 h, 1800 h, and 2400 h, and the thermal-humidity index (THI) was calculated. All the procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee for Biotechnology of the National Chung Hsing University (IACUC No. 106-058). The lactating dairy cows, between 50 and 70 days in milk (DIM) and with normal uterus involution and ovarian function was enrolled for this experiment. The parity of the cows ranged from 1 to 4, except for two cows that gave birth six and seven times, respectively [average parity: 2.9 ± 1.6 (mean ± SD)]. The body condition score (BCS) of the cows ranged from 2.5 to 3.25 based on a 5-point scale [21], and the average BCS was 3.03 ± 0.26.
Experimental design
A total of 21 lactating dairy cows were subjected to synchronization of the estrous cycle employing the modified Ovsynch-48 protocol, and the following experimental protocol was conducted on the animals after successful synchronization (Fig. 1). The modified Ovsynch-48 protocol involved administration of 250 μg GnRH (100 μg/ml Fertagyl/gonadorelin; Intervet Deutschland, Unterschleiβheim, Germany) intramuscularly (im) to cows having random estrous cycle; 7 days later, the cows received 375 μg of PGF2α (250 μg/ml Estrumate/cloprostenol sodium ; Intervet Deutschland), im (the time of first prostaglandin (PG) F2α injection during synchronization; SynPG). A second dose of PGF2α (250 μg) was administered after 24 h, and another dose of GnRH (250 μg) was administrated 48 h after the first dose of PGF2α (SynG2). If the cows were not synchronized, by presenting no signs of complete luteolysis/ovulation but were still between 50 and 70 DIM, the process of synchronization was repeated using a modified Ovsynch-48 protocol.
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of experimental procedures. Blood sampling (BS) for progesterone, luteinizing hormone, and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG); consecutive ultrasound (CU) examination to determine ovulation every 2 h from 24 to 36 h after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or hCG treatments, then every 4 h up to 72 h; 1st and 2nd prostaglandin (PG), administration of 375 μg and 250 μg cloprostenol, respectively. GnRH, 250 μg of gonadorelin; hCG, 3000 IU of hCG; Ovu,observed ovulation time; SynG2, the time of GnRH administration; SynPG, the time of first PGF2α injection during synchronization; U, ultrasonography for follicle and corpus luteum detection and measurements.
After successful synchronization, we first subdivided the cows in two groups: the mid-diestrus group (MD group; 9 to 10 days after ovulation) and the early-diestrus group (ED group; 5.5 to 6.5 days after ovulation). In the MD group, cows were enrolled in stage 1 (DIM: 76.6 ± 9.0) of the experimental protocol 9 to 10 days after ovulation of synchronization. The time of the first PGF2α administration was defined as day 0 of stage 1. On days 0 and 1, cows were treated with 375 and 250 μg PGF2α, respectively. On day 2, the cows were administered im with 250 μg GnRH (GnRH-MD group) or 3000 IU hCG (1,500 IU/ampule Pregnyl/chorionic gonadotrophin; N.V. Organon, Netherlands) (hCG-MD group). If both ovulation within 72 h after GnRH or hCG administration as well as complete luteolysis occurred, the cows were further enrolled in stage 2 of the experimental protocol. Cows with partial luteolysis or absence of ovulation were not assigned to the next stage. During 9 to 10 days after ovulation of stage 1, the treatment protocol in stage 1 was reversed for cows in stage 2 (DIM: 91.0 ± 9.6) —i.e., cows treated with GnRH in stage 1 were administered hCG in stage 2 and vice versa.
In the ED group, all procedures were essentially the same as those used in the MD group except that the cows were treated with the first dose of PGF2α between 5.5 and 6.5 days after ovulation of synchronization and stage 1. Cows treated with GnRH were allocated to the GnRH-ED group and the others to hCG-ED group. In stages 1 and 2, the average DIM in the ED group was 69.7 ± 4.2 and 80.1 ± 2.5, respectively.
Ultrasound examination for CL area, follicle diameter, and ovulation
Transrectal B-mode ultrasonography of the ovaries was performed using a portable scanner equipped with a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer (SonoSite Ultrasound System; SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) at SynPG, 24 h after the second GnRH injection of the synchronization stage, and once a day from days 0 to 3 of stages 1 and 2. The method used to measure the longitudinal and transverse axes of the CL and to calculate the remaining CL area has been described previously [4].
The follicle diameter was determined by calculating the average of its longitudinal and transverse axes. The maximum follicle diameters at 24 h after the second GnRH dose of the synchronization stage and on day 3 of stages 1 and 2 were used to quantify the preovulatory follicle diameters. Ovulation was identified by the disappearance of preovulatory follicles followed by the appearance of a new CL at the same site in the ovary. During synchronization, ovulation was determined at 24 h and 32 h after the administration of second GnRH dose. During stages 1 and 2, ovulation was verified every 2 h from 24 to 36 h after GnRH or hCG injections, and then every 4 h up to 72 h until ovulation occurred. The time of disappearance of the preovulatory follicles was defined as the ovulation time.
Blood sampling and hormone analysis
Blood samples were collected from the coccygeal vessels and immediately refrigerated. The samples were then centrifuged (1,300 × g, 10 min), and the serum was harvested and stored at –20ºC until the assay. Blood sampling for analysis of P4 concentrations was performed for all the cows at SynPG, at 24 h after the second dose of GnRH of the synchronization stage and on days 0 and 3 of stages 1 and 2. Serum P4 concentrations were measured using an enzyme immunoassay kit (Progesterone ELISA, Demeditec Diagnostics GmbH, Kiel, Germany), with a sensitivity of 0.045 ng/ml. The average intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6.42% and 6.63%, respectively.
During stages 1 and 2, blood samples for analysis of LH and hCG concentrations were taken before and at every 1 h from 1 to 6 h after GnRH or hCG injections (Fig. 1). Serum LH concentrations were determined using an ELISA sandwich assay kit (LH DETECT for bovines with tetramethylbenzidine substrate; ReproPharm Vet, Nouzilly, France) in all the cows, with a sensitivity of 0.1 ng/ml. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation for this assay were 2.5% and 6.0%, respectively. Serum hCG concentrations in 20 cows (GnRH-MD group = 4, hCG-MD group = 5, GnRH-ED group = 5, and hCG-ED group = 6) were estimated using an enzyme-linked fluorescent assay kit (VIDAS HCG, BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) on a MiniVidas automated analyzer (BioMérieux). The measurement range of this kit was 2 to 1500 mIU/ml, and the detection limit was 2 mIU/ml. The average intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variations were 5.2% and 5.6%, respectively.
Markers of complete luteolysis and successful synchronization
Complete luteolysis was identified by either a P4 concentration < 1 ng/ml or a remaining CL area < 50% at 24 h after the second dose of GnRH of the synchronization stage and on day 3 of the stages 1 and 2 [4]. Successful synchronization was defined using the following three criteria: 1) P4 concentration > 1 ng/ml with accompanying CL formation and at least one follicle with a diameter ≥ 8 mm at SynPG, 2) complete luteolysis at 24 h after the second dose of GnRH, and 3) ovulation of one or more follicles at 32 h after the second GnRH administration.
Milk production
Milk yield in each cow was recorded from days 0 to 3 of stages 1 and 2. Average milk production was calculated for each animal in stages 1 (29.3 ± 5.6 l/day) and 2 (28.4 ± 5.8 l/day).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the SAS software - version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Raleigh, NC, USA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. We considered 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10 as trends. Given the limited sample size and the non-normality of the distribution of the data, we performed group comparisons to test for differences in P4 concentration, remaining CL area, follicular diameter on day 0, preovulatory follicle diameter, ovulation time, DIM, BCS, parity, average THI, and average milk production using the Kruskal-Wallis test (in GnRH-MD, hCG-MD, GnRH-ED, and hCG-ED groups) or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (GnRH vs. hCG and MD vs. ED). In addition, a post-hoc test for the Kruskal-Wallis analysis was conducted as described in a previous study [22]. Differences in the percentages of complete luteolysis, overall percentages of ovulation, percentages of ovulation within 36 h of GnRH or hCG injection, and percentages of multiple ovulation (number of cows having more than one ovulated follicle/number of cows ovulating) were analyzed using the chi-square test and the Fisher’s exact test for comparison among four groups and between two groups, respectively. Differences in LH and hCG concentrations measured at various time points (seven time points from 0 to 6 h; using a within-subject design) among the four groups (GnRH-MD, hCG-MD, GnRH-ED, and hCG-ED groups; using a between-subject design) were determined using a repeated measures ANOVA, and the Bonferroni’s method was applied to perform multiple comparison.
Results
Synchronization
Synchronization was achieved for 24 estrous cycles from 21 cows. There were three cows that underwent the modified Ovsynch-48 protocol twice. The results of synchronization are shown in Table 1. Complete luteolysis could be identified in all the cows, and ovulation occurred in 20 synchronized cycles. The overall percentage of the synchronized cycles was 83.3% (20/24).
Table 1. Results of the synchronization.
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Number of CL at SynPG | 1.9 ± 1.1 |
| P4 at SynPG (ng/ml) | 7.27 ± 2.74 |
| P4 at 24 h after second GnRH (ng/ml) | 0.44 ± 0.11 |
| Remaining CL area at 24 h after second GnRH (%) | 37.0 ± 12.2 |
| Complete luteolysis (%) | 100.0 (24/24) |
| Preovulatory follicle diameter (mm) | 14.3 ± 2.8 |
| Ovulation (%) | 83.3 (20/24) |
| Multiple ovulation (%) | 15.0 (3/20) |
| Synchronization (%) | 83.3 (20/24) |
A total of 21 cows were synchronized for 24 estrous cycles. CL, corpus luteum; GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; P4, progesterone; SynPG, the time point of first prostaglandin F2α administration. Data are shown as mean ± SD.
Stages 1 and 2
Before initiating the stage 1 experiment, one cow was excluded because of acute mastitis. In this study, because the sample size in the stages 1 or 2 of each treatment group was too small (n = 3 to 5), a sequence effect (i.e., at stages 1 and 2) on the percentages of complete luteolysis and ovulation was tested. Statistical analysis showed no sequence effect on these parameters (data not shown). Therefore, all the data from stages 1 and 2 were grouped together, and the cows were reassigned to two groups: 1) the GnRH and hCG groups, or 2) the ED and MD groups. Accordingly, four groups, i.e., GnRH-ED, GnRH-MD, hCG-ED, and hCG-MD, were taken into account for further statistical analysis. In total, there were nine cows in the GnRH-MD group, nine in hCG-MD group, eight in GnRH-ED group, and eight in the hCG-ED group. No significant differences were found among the four groups with regard to parity, BCS, DIM, average THI, and average milk production.
Except for five cows detected with more than one CL, all the remaining animals had only one CL. On day 0, the P4 concentrations were higher in GnRH-MD than in the GnRH-ED and hCG-ED groups; however, no significant differences could be detected for P4 concentration on day 3 (Table 2). On average, the values of the remaining CL area in the GnRH-MD group from day 1 to 3 were lower than those in the GnRH-ED group. Although there was each one cow with partial luteolysis in the GnRH-ED and hCG-ED groups, the percentage of complete luteolysis was not statistically different among the four groups.
Table 2. Luteolytic and ovulatory parameters in the four groups after data from stages 1 and 2 were pooled together.
| Parameters | GnRH-MD | hCG-MD | GnRH-ED | hCG-ED | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 9) | (n = 9) | (n = 8) | (n = 8) | ||
| P4 on day 0 (ng/ml) | 8.14 ± 0.72 a | 7.96 ± 1.06 ab | 4.69 ± 0.77 b | 4.62 ± 0.62 b | 0.0037 |
| P4 on day 3 (ng/ml) | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 0.46 | 0.74 ± 0.27 | 0.5969 |
| Remaining CL area on day 1 (%) | 60.6 ± 2.7 b | 69.8 ± 4.9 ab | 82.4 ± 6.0 a | 73.4 ± 5.4 ab | 0.0222 |
| Remaining CL area on day 2 (%) | 44.6 ± 2.4 b | 49.4 ± 2.4 ab | 61.1 ± 5.0 a | 54.7 ± 3.5 ab | 0.0324 |
| Remaining CL area on day 3 (%) | 28.7 ± 1.1 b | 35.0 ± 3.3 ab | 43.4 ± 4.0 a | 41.6 ± 4.7 ab | 0.0127 |
| Complete luteolysis (%) | 100.0 (9/9) | 100.0 (9/9) | 87.5 (7/8) | 87.5 (7/8) | 0.4954 |
| Follicle diameter on day 0 (mm) | 16.4 ± 0.8 a | 15.1 ± 1.2 ab | 11.5 ± 1.2 b | 14.3 ± 0.6 ab | 0.0356 |
| Preovulatory follicle diameter (mm) | 17.1 ± 0.7 | 15.9 ± 1.1 | 15.0 ± 1.4 | 17.1 ± 1.0 | 0.3710 |
| Ovulation time (h) | 30.0 ± 1.0 ab | 35.8 ± 4.6 a | 28.8 ± 0.4 b | 32.8 ± 2.2 ab | 0.0285 |
| Ovulation (%) | 77.8 (7/9) | 88.9 (8/9) | 100.0 (8/8) | 100.0 (8/8) | 0.3061 |
| Ovulation within 36 h (%) | 77.8 (7/9) | 77.8 (7/9) | 100.0 (8/8) | 87.5 (7/8) | 0.5278 |
| Multiple ovulation (%) | 0.0 (0/7) | 12.5 (1/8) | 25.0 (2/8) | 12.5 (1/8) | 0.5558 |
CL, corpus luteum; P4, progesterone; GnRH-MD, treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the mid-diestrus group; GnRH-ED, treated with GnRH in the early-diestrus group; hCG-MD, treated with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the mid-diestrus group; hCG-ED, treated with hCG in the early-diestrus group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant difference between groups in the same row; Categorical and continuous data were tested by the chi-square test and the Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively.
Mean LH profiles throughout the sampling period were affected by different groups, time periods, and a group by time interaction (all P < 0.05). During hours 1 to 3, higher LH concentrations were found in the GnRH-MD and GnRH-ED groups than those in the other two groups. Peak LH concentrations occurred at 2 h after GnRH administration in the GnRH-MD and GnRH-ED groups; the concentrations then decreased until they returned the baseline at 5 h after treatment. With the exception of one cow in the hCG-ED group that showed a spontaneous LH surge and had a similar profile to that observed for the GnRH-MD and GnRH-ED groups, the LH concentration of the cows in the hCG-MD and hCG-ED groups remained at baseline levels (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations in lactating dairy cows receiving treatment in the GnRH-MD, hCG-MD, GnRH-ED, and hCG-ED groups. GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; GnRH-MD, treated with GnRH in the mid-diestrus group; GnRH-ED, treated with GnRH in the early-diestrus group; hCG-MD, treated with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the mid-diestrus group; hCG-ED, treated with hCG in the early-diestrus group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. The P values of different groups, time periods, and a group by time interaction were < 0.05.
Mean hCG profiles throughout the sampling period were affected by different groups, time periods, and a group by time interaction (all P < 0.05). Except for 0 and 1 h, the hCG concentrations were higher in the hCG-MD and hCG-ED groups than in the other two groups. The hCG concentrations between 0 and 6 h in the GnRH-MD and GnRH-ED groups were 2 mIU/ml below the detection limit. We observed an increase of the hCG concentration during the first three hours in the hCG-MD and hCG-ED groups, followed by a slight deceleration in the rate of increase (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) concentrations in lactating dairy cows receiving treatment in the GnRH-MD, hCG-MD, GnRH-ED, and hCG-ED groups. GnRH-MD, treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the mid-diestrus group; GnRH-ED, treated with GnRH in the early-diestrus group; hCG-MD, treated with hCG in the mid-diestrus group; hCG-ED, treated with hCG in the early-diestrus group; Data are shown as mean ± SEM. The P values of different groups, time periods, and a group by time interaction were < 0.05.
As shown in Table 3, all the cows ovulated between 28 and 32 h after GnRH administration (with the exception of one cow that ovulated at 34 h and two cows that did not ovulate). One cow, which was initially identified with partial luteolysis, ovulated at 28 h. However, ovulation occurred between 30 and 32 h in the majority of cows treated with hCG. Two cows were observed to ovulate at 34 h and 68 h, and one cow that did not ovulate in the hCG-MD group. In the hCG-ED group, one cow with a spontaneous LH surge ovulated at 28 h, and one cow ovulated at 48 h. In the cow showing partial luteolysis, ovulation occurred at 32 h. Overall, the occurrence of ovulation in the hCG-MD group was later than that in the GnRH-ED group (Table 2). Although we excluded data from the cows ovulating later than 36 h after GnRH or hCG administration, the ovulation time still tended to be different between these two groups (P = 0.06). The average follicle diameter on day 0 was smaller in the GnRH-ED group than in the GnRH-MD group; however, the mean values for preovulatory follicle diameters varied between 15 and 17 mm and were not different among the four groups. Furthermore, the overall percentage of ovulation and the percentage of ovulation within 36 h of treatment were not different among the groups. There was one cow in the hCG-MD group, two in GnRH-ED group, and one in hCG-ED group that showed multiple ovulation; however, the percentage of multiple ovulation was not different among groups.
Table 3. Time of ovulation after data from stages 1 and 2 were pooled together.
| Group | Ovulation time (h) after GnRH or hCG injection |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 28 | ≤ 30 | ≤ 32 | ≤ 34 | ≤ 36 | > 36 | no ovulation | |
| GnRH-MD (n = 9) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| hCG-MD (n = 9) | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GnRH-ED (n = 8) | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| hCG-ED (n = 8) | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; GnRH-MD, treated with GnRH in the mid-diestrus group; GnRH-ED, treated with GnRH in the early-diestrus group; hCG-MD, treated with hCG in the mid-diestrus group; hCG-ED, treated with hCG in the early-diestrus group; > 36: ovulation occurred between 40 h and 72 h.
Comparisons between the GnRH and hCG groups
With respect to luteolysis, there was no difference in P4 concentration or in the remaining CL area between the GnRH and hCG groups (Table 4). The percentage of complete luteolysis was 94.1% for both the groups. Regarding ovulatory responses, excluding ovulation time, there were no significant differences between the GnRH and hCG groups in terms of follicle diameter on day 0, preovulatory follicle diameter, the percentage of overall ovulation, the percentage of ovulation within 36 h, and the percentage of multiple ovulation. Collectively, ovulation in the GnRH group occurred earlier than in the hCG group. After excluding two cows that ovulated later than 36 h post-treatment, we observed that the period between GnRH injection and ovulation in the GnRH group was shorter than that in the hCG group (29.3 ± 0.5 h vs. 30.9 ± 0.4 h, P = 0.0240; mean ± SEM).
Table 4. Luteolytic and ovulatory parameters in the GnRH and hCG groups.
| Parameters | GnRH (n = 17) | hCG (n = 17) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| P4 on day 0 (ng/ml) | 6.52 ± 0.67 | 6.39 ± 0.74 | 0.7977 |
| P4 on day 3 (ng/ml) | 0.63 ± 0.21 | 0.61 ± 0.13 | 0.2431 |
| Remaining CL area on day 1 (%) | 70.8 ± 4.1 | 71.5 ± 3.5 | 0.6088 |
| Remaining CL area on day 2 (%) | 52.4 ± 3.3 | 51.9 ± 2.1 | 0.7846 |
| Remaining CL area on day 3 (%) | 35.6 ± 2.6 | 38.1 ± 2.9 | 0.4540 |
| Complete luteolysis (%) | 94.1 (16/17) | 94.1 (16/17) | 1.0000 |
| Follicle diameter on day 0 (mm) | 13.8 ± 0.9 | 14.7 ± 0.7 | 0.6729 |
| Preovulatory follicle diameter (mm) | 16.0 ± 0.8 | 16.5 ± 0.7 | 0.6296 |
| Ovulation time (h) | 29.3 ± 0.5 b | 34.3 ± 2.5 a | 0.0098 |
| Ovulation (%) | 88.2 (15/17) | 94.1 (16/17) | 1.0000 |
| Ovulation within 36 h (%) | 88.2 (15/17) | 82.4 (14/17) | 1.0000 |
| Multiple ovulation (%) | 13.3 (2/15) | 12.5 (2/16) | 1.0000 |
CL, corpus luteum; P4, progesterone; GnRH, cows treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone; hCG, cows treated with human chorionic gonadotropin. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant difference between groups in the same row; Categorical and continuous data were tested by the Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, respectively.
Comparisons between the MD and ED groups
We did not observe any significant differences in ovulatory responses between the MD and ED groups, except for differences in follicle diameters on day 0, which were significantly smaller in the ED group than in the MD group (Table 5). With respect to the CL, the P4 concentration in the MD group was higher on day 0 than in the ED group. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of P4 concentrations on day 3, the remaining CL area between days 1 and 3 were lower in the MD group than in the ED group. The percentages of complete luteolysis were 100% and 87.5% in the MD and ED groups, respectively; however, this difference was not statistically significant.
Table 5. Luteolytic and ovulatory parameters in the MD and ED groups.
| Parameters | MD (n = 18) | ED (n = 16) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| P4 on day 0 (ng/ml) | 8.05 ± 0.62 a | 4.66 ± 0.48 b | 0.0009 |
| P4 on day 3 (ng/ml) | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.81 ± 0.26 | 0.5500 |
| Remaining CL area on day 1 (%) | 65.2 ± 2.9 b | 77.9 ± 4.1 a | 0.0126 |
| Remaining CL area on day 2 (%) | 47.0 ± 1.8 b | 57.9 ± 3.1 a | 0.0126 |
| Remaining CL area on day 3 (%) | 31.8 ± 1.9 b | 42.5 ± 3.0 a | 0.0082 |
| Complete luteolysis (%) | 100 (18/18) | 87.5 (14/16) | 0.2139 |
| Follicle diameter on day 0 (mm) | 15.8 ± 0.7 a | 12.8 ± 0.8 b | 0.0208 |
| Preovulatory follicle diameter (mm) | 16.5 ± 0.6 | 16.0 ± 0.9 | 0.8927 |
| Ovulation (%) | 83.3 (15/18) | 100.0 (16/16) | 0.2299 |
| Ovulation within 36 h (%) | 77.8 (14/18) | 93.8 (15/16) | 0.3402 |
| Multiple ovulation (%) | 6.7 (1/15) | 18.8 (3/16) | 0.5996 |
CL, corpus luteum; P4, progesterone; MD, all cows treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the mid-diestrus; ED, all cows treated with GnRH or hCG in the early-diestrus. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant difference between groups in the same row; Categorical and continuous data were tested by the Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, respectively.
Discussion
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of hCG induction during mid- and early-diestrus on ovulatory responses in lactating dairy cows. Human chorionic gonadotropin acts directly on LH receptors and thus induces ovulation independent of the pituitary [6]; therefore, we hypothesized that ovulation after hCG administration may occur earlier than ovulation after GnRH administration. Contrary to our initial predictions, our results suggest that the hCG-induced ovulation time was 2 to 4 h later than GnRH-induced ovulation. Previous studies have reported an LH surge occurs 1 or 2 h after a GnRH pulse [23,24,25], and our findings were in line with these studies. Additionally, the ovulation time determined in our study had a number of similarities with that reported by Giordano et al. (2012) [3] and replicated our earlier data [4]. Other researchers have demonstrated that the serum concentration of hCG was above the baseline even at 66 h in cows treated with 3000 IU hCG (1000 IU iv and 2000 IU im) [26]. Another study reported that hCG concentration reaches a maximum at 4 h after intramuscular hCG administration (3300 IU), remains at plateau between 4 and 12 h, and decreases to baseline values at 72 h post-treatment [13]. In our study, we found that hCG concentrations were still increasing between 4 and 6 h after hCG injection, indicating that more time would be needed for the hCG to reach its peak concentration as compared to the time that GnRH-induced LH would take to reach its peak concentration to induce ovulation. Despite the fact that higher hCG concentrations may be achieved in a short period of time after intravenous administration, effects of different routes of administration (intravenous vs. intramuscular injection) on ovulation time should be explored.
As expected, the percentage of ovulation (including percentage of ovulation within 36 h) was not different among the groups receiving different treatments in this study. One report has indicated that the percentage of ovulation after hCG injection was significantly higher than that after GnRH administration in a high P4 environment; however, no difference in the percentage of ovulation was observed when the P4 concentration was below 1 ng/ml [5]. In this study, almost all the cows showed complete luteolysis that yielded similar percentages of ovulation when groups administered with different treatments were compared. In contrast, although no significant differences in the percentage of ovulation could be detected regarding the different diestrous periods, the percentage of ovulation was higher in the ED group than in the MD group. In this study, atretic follicles were observed in two non-ovulating cows in the GnRH-MD and hCG-MD groups, and in one cow that ovulated at 68 h, a preovulatory follicle developed into a cyst, followed by the formation of a new follicle on day 2. These results were in accordance with our previous findings showing that a few follicles in the mid-estrous cycle result in atresia or form cysts rather than ovulate after ovulation induction [4]. Moreover, fewer LH receptors in the granulosa cells have been shown in atretic follicles [27] or cysts [28] than in dominant follicles. Thus, we can speculate that non-ovulation of follicles in the mid-estrous cycle, which results in atresia or cyst-formation, may be due to an underlying loss of LH receptors.
No significant differences were detected in preovulatory follicle diameters among the four groups. Diameter of a preovulatory follicle is described to be in a range of 10–22 mm, and follicle size during the highest peak of ovulation is between 15–17 mm [29, 30]. In the current study, most of the preovulatory follicle diameters were higher than 10 mm (11–21 mm), with the exception of three follicles that were lower than 10 mm. The occurrence of three preovulatory follicles below 10 mm are likely to be related to two distinctive situations: 1) double ovulation occurred, with preovulatory follicles having smaller diameters (8.3 and 9.6 mm), 2) the expected preovulatory follicle turned into a cyst, and a new follicle formed on day 2 ovulated at 68 h after hCG administration. Although there was no effect of diestrous period on the diameters of preovulatory follicles, the size of dominant follicles in the MD group on day 0 was higher than that in the ED group in this study. Other studies have relied on only a single measurement to determine the preovulatory follicle size at the time of PGF2α treatment, a second dose of GnRH, or artificial insemination using the Ovsynch protocol [31,32,33]. However, we measured the size of follicles several times, i.e., once a day from day 0 to day 3. Given that the groups did not exhibit differences in their preovulatory follicle diameters, the dominant follicle diameter on day 0 in the MD group was bigger than that in the ED group. Thus, we speculate that the dominant follicle had a more potential to grow in the ED group rather than in the MD group.
Interestingly, we observed that one follicle in the GnRH-MD group with 17.6 × 14.0 mm diameter on day 3 was detected at 28 h after GnRH injection and subsequently disappeared at 30 h. However, since development of a CL was not detected 5 days later, it was identified as a case of anovulation. In addition to endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells, the CL is composed of large and small luteal cells [34], which are transformed from granulosa and theca cells, respectively [35]. Apoptosis of granulosa cells has been demonstrated when the follicles undergo atresia [36, 37]. From our observations, we can speculate that the follicle described above underwent a process of gradual atresia with apoptosis of the granulosa cells instead of being transformed into large luteal cells.
The percentages of complete luteolysis were 100% in both the GnRH-MD and hCG-MD groups, which is consistent with our previous findings [4, 20] and provides evidence once again towards the advantage of using two low doses of PGF2αfor the complete regression of mature CL. In this study, we found two cows with partial luteolysis as indicated by parameters, such as P4 concentration above 1 ng/ml and remaining CL area more than 50% in the ED group during stage 1. Valldecabres-Torres and co-workers (2012) showed that a single standard dose or double dose of PGF2α for CL aged 5.5 days resulted in 80% and 100% of complete luteolysis, respectively [38]. Considering a period of seven days between the first GnRH and PGF2α in the Ovsynch protocol [1] and 28 to 30 h ovulation time after GnRH administration [3], we expected to achieve a similar effect using two low doses of PGF2α. Although we achieved a high proportion (87.5%) of complete luteolysis in the ED group, partial luteolysis occurred in some animals, which were consequently excluded from the next stage of the experiment. To prevent partial luteolysis and non-ovulation, we suggest that the optimal interval from ovulation to the first PGF2α treatment should be designed to fall on any day between 6.5 and 9 days in further experiments having a similar design.
In summary, we provide evidence that hCG-induced ovulation occurred later than GnRH-induced ovulation, but the percentages of ovulation did not differ between hCG and GnRH treatment during mid- and early-diestrus. Even with high percentages of ovulation and complete luteolysis, risk of non-ovulation and partial luteolysis may exist when an ovulation protocol is started in the early and middle phases of diestrus, respectively.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the farm employees for technical assistance.
References
- 1.Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2alpha and GnRH. Theriogenology 1995; 44: 915–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Souza AH, Cunha AP, Silva EP, Gümen A, Ayres H, Guenther JN, Wiltbank MC. Comparison of gonadorelin products in lactating dairy cows: efficacy based on induction of ovulation of an accessory follicle and circulating luteinizing hormone profiles. Theriogenology 2009; 72: 271–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Giordano JO, Fricke PM, Guenther JN, Lopes G, Jr, Herlihy MM, Nascimento AB, Wiltbank MC. Effect of progesterone on magnitude of the luteinizing hormone surge induced by two different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 3781–3793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu TC, Chiang CF, Ho CT, Chan JP. Effect of GnRH on ovulatory response after luteolysis induced by two low doses of PGF2α in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2018; 105: 45–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Binversie JA, Pfeiffer KE, Larson JE. Modifying the double-Ovsynch protocol to include human chorionic gonadotropin to synchronize ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2012; 78: 2095–2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yavas Y, Johnson WH, Walton JS. Modification of follicular dynamics by exogenous FSH and progesterone, and the induction of ovulation using hCG in postpartum beef cows. Theriogenology 1999; 52: 949–963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.De Rensis F, López-Gatius F, García-Ispierto I, Techakumpu M. Clinical use of human chorionic gonadotropin in dairy cows: an update. Theriogenology 2010; 73: 1001–1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Atkins JA, Busch DC, Bader JF, Keisler DH, Patterson DJ, Lucy MC, Smith MF. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced ovulation and luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers: effect of day of the cycle. J Anim Sci 2008; 86: 83–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dias FC, Colazo MG, Kastelic JP, Mapletoft RJ, Adams GP, Singh J. Progesterone concentration, estradiol pretreatment, and dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone affect gonadotropin-releasing hormone-mediated luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2010; 39: 155–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Keskin A, Yilmazbas-Mecitoglu G, Gumen A, Karakaya E, Darici R, Okut H. Effect of hCG vs. GnRH at the beginning of the Ovsynch on first ovulation and conception rates in cyclic lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2010; 74: 602–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.De Rensis F, Bottarelli E, Battioni F, Capelli T, Techakumphu M, García-Ispierto I, López-Gatius F. Reproductive performance of dairy cows with ovarian cysts after synchronizing ovulation using GnRH or hCG during the warm or cool period of the year. Theriogenology 2008; 69: 481–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.De Rensis F, Valentini R, Gorrieri F, Bottarelli E, Lopez-Gatius F. Inducing ovulation with hCG improves the fertility of dairy cows during the warm season. Theriogenology 2008; 69: 1077–1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nascimento AB, Bender RW, Souza AH, Ayres H, Araujo RR, Guenther JN, Sartori R, Wiltbank MC. Effect of treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin on day 5 after timed artificial insemination on fertility of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 2873–2882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nascimento AB, Souza AH, Guenther JN, Costa FP, Sartori R, Wiltbank MC. Effects of treatment with human chorionic gonadotrophin or intravaginal progesterone-releasing device after AI on circulating progesterone concentrations in lactating dairy cows. Reprod Fertil Dev 2013; 25: 818–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stevenson JS, Portaluppi MA, Tenhouse DE, Lloyd A, Eborn DR, Kacuba S, DeJarnette JM. Interventions after artificial insemination: conception rates, pregnancy survival, and ovarian responses to gonadotropin-releasing hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin, and progesterone. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 331–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Santos JE, Thatcher WW, Pool L, Overton MW. Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on luteal function and reproductive performance of high-producing lactating Holstein dairy cows. J Anim Sci 2001; 79: 2881–2894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fischer-Tenhagen C, Thiele G, Heuwieser W, Tenhagen BA. Efficacy of a treatment with hCG 4 days after AI to reduce pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows after synchronized ovulation. Reprod Domest Anim 2010; 45: 468–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vasconcelos JL, Sá Filho OG, Justolin PL, Morelli P, Aragon FL, Veras MB, Soriano S. Effects of postbreeding gonadotropin treatments on conception rates of lactating dairy cows subjected to timed artificial insemination or embryo transfer in a tropical environment. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 223–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pursley JR, Silcox RW, Wiltbank MC. Effect of time of artificial insemination on pregnancy rates, calving rates, pregnancy loss, and gender ratio after synchronization of ovulation in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 2139–2144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu TC, Ho CY, Chan JP. Effect of two low doses of prostaglandin F2α on luteolysis in dairy cows. Acta Vet Hung 2017; 65: 105–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 68–78. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Elliott AC, Hynan LS. A SAS(®) macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal-Wallis analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2011; 102: 75–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Armengol-Gelonch R, Mallo JM, Ponté D, Jimenez A, Valenza A, Souza AH. Impact of phase of the estrous cycle and season on LH surge profile and fertility in dairy cows treated with different GnRH analogs (gonadorelin vs. buserelin). Theriogenology 2017; 91: 121–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Picard-Hagen N, Lhermie G, Florentin S, Merle D, Frein P, Gayrard V. Effect of gonadorelin, lecirelin, and buserelin on LH surge, ovulation, and progesterone in cattle. Theriogenology 2015; 84: 177–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stevenson JS, Pulley SL. Feedback effects of estradiol and progesterone on ovulation and fertility of dairy cows after gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced release of luteinizing hormone. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 3003–3015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schmitt EJ, Diaz T, Barros CM, de la Sota RL, Drost M, Fredriksson EW, Staples CR, Thorner R, Thatcher WW. Differential response of the luteal phase and fertility in cattle following ovulation of the first-wave follicle with human chorionic gonadotropin or an agonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J Anim Sci 1996; 74: 1074–1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xu Z, Garverick HA, Smith GW, Smith MF, Hamilton SA, Youngquist RS. Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in bovine follicles during the first follicular wave. Biol Reprod 1995; 53: 951–957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marelli BE, Diaz PU, Salvetti NR, Rey F, Ortega HH. mRNA expression pattern of gonadotropin receptors in bovine follicular cysts. Reprod Biol 2014; 14: 276–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Colazo MG, Behrouzi A, Ambrose DJ, Mapletoft RJ. Diameter of the ovulatory follicle at timed artificial insemination as a predictor of pregnancy status in lactating dairy cows subjected to GnRH-based protocols. Theriogenology 2015; 84: 377–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Giordano JO, Wiltbank MC, Fricke PM, Bas S, Pawlisch R, Guenther JN, Nascimento AB. Effect of increasing GnRH and PGF2α dose during Double-Ovsynch on ovulatory response, luteal regression, and fertility of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2013; 80: 773–783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bisinotto RS, Chebel RC, Santos JE. Follicular wave of the ovulatory follicle and not cyclic status influences fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93: 3578–3587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pereira MH, Wiltbank MC, Barbosa LF, Costa WM, Jr, Carvalho MA, Vasconcelos JL. Effect of adding a gonadotropin-releasing-hormone treatment at the beginning and a second prostaglandin F2α treatment at the end of an estradiol-based protocol for timed artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows during cool or hot seasons of the year. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 947–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pulley SL, Keisler DH, Stevenson JS. Concentrations of luteinizing hormone and ovulatory responses in dairy cows before timed artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 6188–6201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Miyamoto A, Shirasuna K, Sasahara K. Local regulation of corpus luteum development and regression in the cow: Impact of angiogenic and vasoactive factors. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2009; 37: 159–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Niswender GD, Juengel JL, Silva PJ, Rollyson MK, McIntush EW. Mechanisms controlling the function and life span of the corpus luteum. Physiol Rev 2000; 80: 1–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Carou MC, Cruzans PR, Maruri A, Stockert JC, Lombardo DM. Apoptosis in ovarian granulosa cells of cattle: morphological features and clearance by homologous phagocytosis. Acta Histochem 2015; 117: 92–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hussein MR. Apoptosis in the ovary: molecular mechanisms. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11: 162–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Valldecabres-Torres X, García-Roselló E, García-Muñoz A, Cuervo-Arango J. Effects of d-cloprostenol dose and corpus luteum age on ovulation, luteal function, and morphology in nonlactating dairy cows with early corpora lutea. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 4389–4395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]