Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 21.
Published in final edited form as: NMR Biomed. 2009 Feb;22(2):158–164. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1294

Effect of phosphate electrolyte buffer on the dynamics of water in tendon and cartilage

ShaoKuan Zheng a, Yang Xia a,*
PMCID: PMC6925598  NIHMSID: NIHMS1063243  PMID: 18720450

Abstract

A number of NMR spectroscopic and microscopic MRI (μMRI) techniques were used to study proton dynamics in canine tendon and articular cartilage immersed in normal saline solution (NaCl solution) and high-concentration phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution. In a proton CPMG experiment on tendons, the T2 relaxation of the tissue was found to be anisotropic and had two populations. When immersed in saline, the T2 values were short and their relative populations were anisotropic. When immersed in PBS, the T2 values increased and their relative populations became isotropic. These phenomena, also verified by proton double-quantum-filtered (DQF) NMR spectroscopy, were interpreted as the catalyzing effect of phosphate ions on proton exchange between water molecules. In the experiment on articular cartilage, the immersion of cartilage–bone blocks in PBS resulted in a significant reduction in the laminar appearance of cartilage on MRI (the magic angle effect). The quantitative T2 anisotropy by μMRI at 13 μm pixel resolution and DQF NMR spectroscopy confirmed the substantial effect of PBS on the water dynamics in cartilage tissue blocks. This preliminary study has two important implications. For in vitro cartilage research, this work confirms the importance of the salt solution in which the specimen is stored – not all salts have the same effect on the measurable quantities in NMR and MRI. For in vivo cartilage diagnosis, especially using whole-body MRI scanners, this work suggests the possibility of using a suitable electrolyte as a novel contrast agent to assess the ultrastructural changes in cartilage due to tissue degradation.

Keywords: cartilage, phosphate, magic angle, T2 relaxation, anisotropy, microscopic MRI, double-quantum filtered spectroscopy

INTRODUCTION

Several NMR and MRI properties of connective tissues (e.g. tendon and articular cartilage) are known to be anisotropic (i.e. depend on the orientation of the specimen in the polarizing magnetic field B0) (1,2). As early as 1962, Berendsen (3) reported that the proton NMR signal had an isotropic central peak and an angular-dependent doublet in a partially dehydrated tendon. In a fresh bovine tendon, Krasnosselskaia et al. (4) measured the orientational dependence of the free induction decay of proton signals and showed that the dipolar coupling was responsible for a sixfold variation in the signal intensity with the specimen orientations between that parallel with the external magnetic field and the one at the magic angle. These anisotropic phenomena in tendons have been attributed to the direct dipolar interaction between intramolecular water protons in the fibrillose specimens (513).

Compared with the morphological structure of tendon, which is densely packed bundles of type-I collagen fibers, the morphological structure of articular cartilage is much more complex. In particular, non-calcified cartilage has a depth-dependent structure of type-II collagen fibrils, where the tissue is commonly divided into three structural zones across its thickness (depth). Starting from the surface, these three structural zones are: (I) the superficial (tangential) zone, where the collagen fibrils are parallel to the surface;(II) the transitional (intermediate) zone, where the collagen fibrils are mostly randomly oriented; and (III) the radial (deep) zone, where the collagen fibrils are oriented perpendicular to the surface (14,15). This depth-dependent fibril structure of articular cartilage results in a laminar appearance in the intensity images from MRI, the so-called magic angle effect in MRI of cartilage (2,1626). The experimental fact (2) that the anisotropic characteristics of T2 relaxation in articular cartilage quantitatively follow the geometric factor in the dipolar spin Hamiltonian, (3cos2θ − 1), promotes the idea that T2 anisotropy in cartilage is mainly influenced by the dipolar interaction between the water protons and the collagen fibril network (2,18,22,25).

NMR/MRI study of relaxation anisotropy in tendon and cartilage is important because it provides a quantitative mechanism for monitoring the structure and macromolecular characteristics of the tissue. This approach has been used to study rehabilitation of ruptured tendons (12,27) and early changes in the tissue due to osteoarthritis (28,29). To filter out the large isotropic signal, Navon and his colleagues have been using multiple-quantum-filtered techniques to obtain NMR signal that is exclusively from macromolecules experiencing anisotropic motion (27,3244). As the laminar appearance of cartilage in MRI is mainly due to the non-vanishing intramolecular dipolar interaction, which may complicate the clinical interpretation of the images, several dipolar refocusing schemes (e.g. solid echo and spin lock) have been proposed to eliminate the dipolar interaction and to reduce the laminar appearance of cartilage in clinical MRI (30,31).

Berendsen and Migchelsen (45,46) in the 1960s made the interesting observation that the addition of certain salts that contain proton-donating or proton-accepting ions to hydrated collagen influences the proton NMR spectra in the same way as raising the temperature. This phenomenon was explained by the fact that these salts increase the rate of proton exchange between the water molecules, thus limiting the average lifetime of proton pairs (6,7). The purpose of this preliminary study is therefore twofold: (a) to investigate the influence of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on the dynamics of water molecules in tendons and cartilage through T2 relaxation and proton double-quantum-filtered (DQF) NMR spectroscopy, and (b) to investigate this effect on the laminar appearance of articular cartilage in MRI.

EXPERIMENTAL

Solutions of normal saline and PBS

All solutions of normal saline and PBS used in our experiments were prepared in our laboratory. A solution of normal saline is simply 0.9% NaCl in deionized water. A solution of PBS was prepared as follows. First, 276 g sodium phosphate monobasic (monohydrate) was added to deionized water. The volume of the phosphate buffer was then brought to 1 liter after adjustment of the pH to 7.3 with NaOH. Then 9 g NaCl was added to 50 mL of the phosphate buffer and diluted to 1 liter with deionized water. The final PBS solution contained a phosphate concentration of 100 mM and a sodium concentration of 150 mM, and had a pH corresponding to physiological pH (~7.4).

Tendon and cartilage samples

Fresh Achilles tendons and humeral heads were harvested within 4 h of death from dogs sacrificed for unrelated cardiovascular research. The dogs were 1–2 years old and musculoskeletally healthy. The tendons were immersed in saline solution and frozen at −80°C until used. Before the NMR measurement was taken, a tendon was thawed at 4°C in saline or the PBS solution for 2 days for stabilization. Then the surface of the specimen was wiped dry and the specimen was sealed in a 5 mm NMR tube with Fluorinert FC-77 (3M Co., St Paul, MN, USA). Three pieces of tendon (from three different animals) were used in this investigation. For cartilage samples, tissue slices of 1.75 mm thickness were cut from the humeral head using a table diamond saw. Three or four cartilage–bone plugs were cut from each slice, and the plugs, all with relatively flat surface, were used in the experiments. A total of five cartilage specimens (from three dogs) were used in this study. Before the NMR or MRI experiment, the cartilage–bone plugs were bathed in saline or PBS and kept at −20°C until used. All cartilage–bone samples were sealed in NMR tubes with an internal diameter of 2.34 mm (Wilmad Glass, Buena, NJ, USA) for NMR and MRI experiments.

NMR spectroscopy and microscopic MRI (μMRI)

NMR spectroscopic and μMRI experiments were performed at room temperature on a Bruker Avance II 300 NMR spectrometer equipped with a 7T/89 mm-wide vertical-bore superconducting magnet and micro-imaging accessory (Bruker Instruments, Billerica, MA, USA). A Bruker 5 mm birdcage coil with rotation device was used for the tendon experiments, where the long axis of the tendon sample was varied in the magnetic field. A home-made 3 mm solenoid coil was used for cartilage–bone experiments, where the orientation of the collagen fibrils in the deep zone of the cartilage block with respect to the static magnetic field can be adjusted (26).

Proton DQF spectroscopic signals were acquired using the following pulse sequence (3739):

90ϕ1°τ2180ϕ2°τ290ϕ1°t190ϕ3°(acquisition) (1)

A set of phase cycles with φ1 = 0, 1, 2, 3; φ2 = 1, 2, 3, 0; φ3 = 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, and φreceiver = 0, 2, 0, 2, 3, 1, 3,1, 2, 0, 2, 0, 1, 3, 1, 3 was used in the DQF experiments. Other critical parameters were: TR = 5 s;16 dummy scans; τ = 400 μs; t1 = 4 μs; a 90° radiofrequency excitation pulse of 5 μs and 7.75 μs for cartilage and tendon samples in solenoid and birdcage coils, respectively.

Spectroscopic measurements of T2 relaxation were performed using a standard CPMG pulse sequence:

90°(τ180°τ)n(acquisition) (2)

A τ value of 500 μs was used in the spectroscopic experiments to avoid the spin-locking effect (47). Only even echoes were used in the experiments, where the last number of echoes was 820. The 90° radiofrequency excitation pulse had a duration of 7.95 μs, the TR was 5 s, and the number of dummy scans was 4. As tendons have at least two populations of water molecules – free water, which has a long T2 relaxation (tens of milliseconds), and bound water, which has a short T2 relaxation (a few milliseconds) (1,813) – the T2 decay curves of proton signals in tendon were fitted by a double-exponential function:

S(t)=A[Pa×exp(t/T2a)+(1Pa)×exp(t/T2b)]+B (3)

where A is the overall signal intensity, B accounts for any offset of the signal, and Pa is the population of one component (T2a).

Quantitative T2-imaging experiments were performed using a magnetization-prepared T2-imaging sequence (2), with a TE of 8.6 ms in the imaging segment (TEi). The TE of the leading contrast segment (TEc) had five increments (0.002, 4, 10, 30, 60 ms) for cartilage in saline at 0° relative to B0, four increments (0.002, 20, 50, 100 ms) for cartilage in saline at the magic angle (~55°) and the cartilage sample in PBS at both 0° and 55°. The TR of the imaging experiment was 2 s. The T2 relaxation time in imaging was calculated by fitting the data on a pixel-by-pixel basis with a single exponential equation. The in-plain pixel resolution, which was across the depth of the cartilage tissue, was 13.0 μm, and the slice thickness was 1 mm.

RESULTS

Tendon in saline and PBS

The spectroscopic results for the tendon from the proton CPMG experiments were fitted with the double-exponential function (eqn 3) and are shown in Fig. 1, where the R values of the exponential fitting were better than 0.998. Four distinguishable features were found. Firstly, the T2 values of water from the tendon immersed in PBS were longer than those from the tendon immersed in saline at all orientations from 0° to 90° relative to the main magnetic field B0. The range of the average T2 values in tendon was 4.6–11.4 ms when immersed in saline, and 10.2–25.2 ms when immersed in PBS. Secondly, both the long and short T2 components were orientational-dependent, no matter whether the tendon was immersed in saline or PBS. Thirdly, the longest T2 values occurred when the specimen was oriented at the magic angle (~55°) to B0. Finally, the two T2 populations in the tendon in saline were strongly anisotropic, whereas in the tendon in PBS they were isotropic.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The double-exponential fitting of proton spectroscopic results from tendon. (a) and (b) are the results for tendon immersed in saline, and (c) and (d) are the results for tendon immersed in PBS. The average of two T2 relaxation times (T2Ave) was calculated using 1/T2Ave = Pa/T2a + (1 − Pa)/T2b.

Figure 2 shows the DQF spectroscopic signals for a tendon specimen immersed in saline and PBS, where the splitting and intensity of the 1H DQF signal are clearly anisotropic. At the 0° orientation where the long axis of the tendon specimen was parallel with B0 (spectrum 1), the dipolar splitting was ~690 Hz for the tendon immersed in saline (a), which agrees with the result in the literature (37). The same splitting was reduced to ~150Hz when the specimen was immersed in PBS (b). In addition, the intensity of the DQF signal for the tendon in PBS at 0° became less than one-twentieth of that in saline. At the 55° orientation (spectrum 4), the smallest 1H dipolar splitting and the weakest 1H dipolar DQF intensity were found for the tendons in both solutions. The dipolar splitting at 55° was ~ 125 Hz for the tendon in saline, and appeared to contain multiple peaks (from 80 Hz to 200 Hz) for the tendon in PBS. The intensity of the dipolar signal for the tendon in PBS at 55° was only about one-fiftieth of that in saline. The full width of the dipolar splitting and the half-height of the dipolar signal are plotted in Fig. 3, which summarizes the trends observed in these orientational-dependent DQF signals.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The DQF signals for tendon samples immersed in saline (a) and PBS (b). The labels 1–6 indicate the orientation of the specimens at 0° (parallel with B0), 17°, 34°, 55° (the magic angle), 74°, and 90°, respectively. The amplitudes of the signals in (b) were increased by 20 times.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The full width (a) and half-height (b) of the proton DQF signals, measured from the signals in Fig. 2. The splitting for tendon in PBS was not measured because the splitting was small and the signal was noisy, as seen in Fig. 2b.

Cartilage in saline and PBS

As the collagen organization in articular cartilage is more complex than that in tendons, μMRI was used to investigate the effect of PBS on the anisotropy of T2 relaxation in different structural zones of cartilage at 0° and the magic angle at 13 μm pixel resolution. Figure 4 shows the proton intensity and T2 images of a cartilage–bone specimen immersed in saline and PBS at ~0° and 55°. The reduction in the laminar appearance of cartilage in MR images when the specimen is immersed in PBS is clear. The one-dimensional profiles of T2 relaxation in cartilage from these images are shown in Fig. 5. Whereas the T2 profiles for cartilage in saline clearly show the well-documented characteristics of a depth-dependent anisotropy (2,22,26), the anisotropy of the T2 profiles for cartilage in PBS appears much weaker. In addition, the T2 values for the tissue in PBS were reduced.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The proton intensity images and T2 images of a cartilage–bone specimen immersed in saline and PBS, at ~0° and 55°, respectively. The proton images were acquired with the shortest T2 contrast (TEc = 0.002 ms and TEi = 8.6 ms). All T2 images were displayed using the maximum and minimum of 60 and 0 ms, respectively.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The T2 profiles of articular cartilage extracted from the two-dimensional images shown in Fig. 4. The weakening of T2 anisotropy when the tissue is immersed in PBS is clear.

The proton DQF spectroscopic method was also used to study the cartilage specimens at 0° and 55°. The results are shown in Fig. 6. Although the tissue block was immersed in either saline or PBS, the protons in the solutions made no contribution to the DQF signal because of their isotropic motions. The DQF signal came exclusively from the residual dipolar coupling, originating from the macromolecules in the tissue that were experiencing anisotropic motions. It is clear from this figure that a strong proton DQF spectrum with a splitting of 120 Hz can only be observed when the specimen is immersed in saline at the 0° orientation. The elimination of the DQF signal for tissue in saline at 55° verifies the prevailing influence of the dipolar coupling, which is minimized at the magic angle. The disappearance of the DQF signals for cartilage in PBS at 0°clearly illustrates the influence of phosphate ions in the PBS solution. The fact that a strong proton DQF signal can only be observed when the sample is immersed in saline at 0° offers vital confirmation that the observed signal in cartilage is from the intended DQF mechanism which is exclusively from anisotropic molecular motion, and not from any leakage of normal (single-quantum) NMR signal. Work investigating other issues that might affect the dynamics of water in tendon and cartilage (e.g. the effects of pH and the concentration of ions) is being performed in our laboratory.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Proton DQF spectroscopic results from cartilage–bone blocks, in saline (a,b) and PBS (c,d).

DISCUSSION

The T2 relaxation in NMR/MRI of tendons and articular cartilage is known to be strongly anisotropic (1,2,810,12,13,1820,22,2426) because of the non-zero averaging of the dipolar interaction between the molecules in the tissues. This non-zero averaging originates from the organized structures of macromolecules at the morphological scales in these tissues, which results in a motional anisotropy in the dynamics of water protons. For articular cartilage, as the tissue has multiple histological zones across its thin depth (thickness), the T2 anisotropy also becomes depth-dependent (2). At the magic angle, minimization of the dipolar interaction restores the T2 relaxation to approximately isotropic, which results in loss of the laminar appearance of articular cartilage in MRI (25).

The physical origin of the proton DQF signal in connective tissues is similar to that of T2 anisotropy, also coming from the residual dipolar interaction associated with the anisotropic averaging of the molecular motions. The proton DQF signal, however, is more sensitive to the degree of molecular orders in biological tissue because it comes exclusively from molecules experiencing anisotropic motion and has no contribution from the large pool of molecules experiencing isotropic motion. In contrast, the anisotropic signal of T2 relaxation in cartilage contains multiple components, both isotropic and anisotropic. Spectroscopic studies of collagen fibrils have found the DQF signal and the splitting of the NMR spectra to be temperature-sensitive (3,6,7,911,45), which has been ascribed to proton exchange between water molecules, the rate of which is increased at increasing temperature.

In the 1960s, Berendsen and Migchelsen (45,46) noticed that the addition to hydrated collagen of certain salts that contain proton-donating or proton-accepting ions can influence the proton NMR spectra in the same way as raising the temperature or increasing the water content. This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that the average lifetime of proton pairs can become limited with the increase in the rate of proton exchange between the water molecules (6,7). Berendsen and Migchelsen (45,46) also found that salts that stabilize native conformations and have hydrogen-bonding properties can increase the exchange rate between water molecules; phosphate and ammonium ions are the most effective and to a lesser extent sulfate ions, but salts such as NaCl do not exert such an effect.

Therefore, our experimental results must be evaluated on the basis of the difference in water dynamics in the specimens when they are immersed in different salt solutions. The mechanism of proton exchange in normal water has been proposed by Meiboom (48)

H2O+H3O+k1H3O++H2O (4)
H2O+OHk2OH+H2O (5)

where k1 and k2 are the rate constants of proton exchanges. For the mechanism of proton exchange in aqueous solution of phosphate buffer, Luz and Meiboom (49) suggested a series of proton transfer reactions between the buffer components through one or more water molecules. Of these reactions, the most efficient was:

H2PO4+H2O+HPO42kHPO42+H2O+H2PO4 (6)

The second-order rate constant k in eqn (6) was found to be 1.45 × 109 mol−1 ·l· s−1 at 25°. It is obvious that H2PO4 and HPO42 act as proton-donating and proton-accepting groups, respectively, for indirect proton exchange in this phosphate buffer solution.

These proton exchange mechanisms can be used to explain our results qualitatively as follows. In vivo or when immersed in saline, there are approximately two populations of water molecules in tendon and cartilage: bound water and free water. The former has a longer time scale in the anisotropic reorientation that the later polulation, both contribute to the final signal in the experiments. The direct proton exchange between the two populations of water molecules must be slow for the tendon sample, which results in the observation of approximately two T2 components. In contrast, when the tissue is immersed in PBS, the phosphate ions can work as a bridge for proton exchange between bound or free water molecules or even between bound and free water molecules, which results in the increase in the T2 value of water in tendon and cartilage.

Although the effect of phosphate ions on the dynamics of water is similar in both tendons and cartilage, small differences between the two tissues can be observed from this study. For instance, a residual dipolar interaction can be seen clearly in the DQF NMR signal in tendons immersed in PBS (Fig. 2b), but the same is not the case for cartilage in PBS (Fig. 6c,d). We think that this difference is caused by the difference in water concentration and ultrastructure of these two tissues: water only occupies about 10% of the wet weight in tendons compared with ~70% in cartilage. So the dipolar interaction in cartilage is weaker than in tendon. In addition, because of the tightly bound collagen fibers in tendons, it is possible that some of the bound water cannot be accessed by the ions in PBS, which results in insufficient exchange between this subpopulation of protons through phosphate ions. In this case, immersion in PBS has no significant effect on this population of water molecules, and, as a result, the DQF NMR signal can still be clearly observed, as seen in Fig. 2. A similar result was found in a previous study (6), in which the protons that give rise to the center line in the H2O collagen spectra below 100% relative humidity did not exchange with H2O or D2O. The authors pointed out that these protons might come from the OH groups on the collagen that are shielded from contact with water.

Finally, Fig. 1 shows that both the value and population of the short and long T2 components were anisotropic when the tendon was immersed in saline, but the population of T2 values became isotropic when the tendon was in PBS. Similar results have been reported (10,12) for fresh tendon not immersed in saline or PBS. Peto and Gillis (10) explained this phenomenon as the influence of cross-relaxation which moves the orientation-dependence of the relaxation times towards the initial values of the decay modes. Takamiya et al. (12) assumed that the magic angle effect had obscured the distinction between the bound and free water fractions. Although we can cautiously ascribe this phenomenon to the proton exchange between bound and free water, a deeper understanding clearly awaits further investigation.

We would like to emphasize that the results in this report were obtained from specimens that were immersed in PBS with a phosphate concentration of 100 mM. We show in this study that phosphate ions at this concentration have strong effects on the dynamics of water molecules in tendons and cartilage. Further study of the concentration-dependence may provide further insights into the mechanism that governs the water dynamics of biological tissues.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that documents the effect of an electrolyte buffer (limited to a high concentration of phosphate ions in this report) on the dynamics of water molecules in articular cartilage observed using microscopic imaging. The μMRI result and spectroscopic NMR results show clearly that the phosphate ion has strong effects on the dynamics of water molecules in tendons and cartilage. When immersed in the PBS solution, the effect of T2 anisotropy in articular cartilage was greatly reduced and the laminar structure almost disappeared. This result has two significant implications. First, in in vitro cartilage studies, it is important to choose the soaking/preservation solution carefully. Some of the ions in the salt solution may have vital effects on the water dynamics of the tissue. Second, in in vivo cartilage studies and clinical diagnosis, if a suitable electrolyte that has strong effects on proton exchange can be found, manipulation of the laminar appearance of cartilage in clinical MRI could become a new image contrast approach for monitoring ultrastructural changes in cartilage degradation due to osteoarthritis and other joint diseases.

Acknowledgements

Y.X. is grateful to the National Institutes of Health for an R01 grant (AR 45172). We are indebted to Dr A. Bidthanapally (Department of Physics, Oakland University) for preparing the solutions used in this study, Mr F. Badar (Department of Physics, Oakland University) for writing a T2 calculation program in MatLab, and Drs C. Les and H. Sabbah (Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA) for providing the canine specimens.

Abbreviations used:

μMRI

microscopic MRI

DQF

double-quantum-filtered

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

REFERENCES

  • 1.Henkelman RM, Stanisz GJ, Kim JK, Bronskill MJ. Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32: 592–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xia Y Relaxation anisotropy in cartilage by NMR microscopy (μMRI) at 14 μm resolution. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 941–949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berendsen HJ. Nuclear magnetic resonance study of collagen hydration. J Chem Phys 1962; 36: 3297–3305. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krasnosselskaia LV, Fullerton GD, Dodd SJ, Cameron IL. Water in tendon: orientational analysis of the free induction decay. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 280–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ramachandran GN, Chandrasekharan R. Interchain hydrogen bonds via bound water molecules in the collagen triple helix. Biopolymers 1968; 6: 1649–1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dehl RE, Hoeve CA. Broad-line NMR study of H2O and D2O in collagen fibers. J Chem Phys 1969; 50: 3245–3251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Migchelsen C, Berendsen HJC. Proton exchange and molecular orientation of water in hydrated collagen fibers. An NMR study of H2O and D2O. J Chem Phys 1973; 59: 296–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fullerton GD, Cameron IL, Ord VA. Orientation of tendons in the magnetic field and its effect on T2 relaxation times. Radiology 1985; 155: 433–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peto S, Gillis P, Henri VP. Structure and dynamics of water in tendon from NMR relaxation measurements. Biophys J 1990; 57: 71–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peto S, Gillis P. Fiber-to-field angle dependence of proton nuclear magnetic relaxation in collagen. Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8: 705–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eliav U, Navon G. A study of dipolar interactions and dynamic processes of water molecules in tendon by 1H and 2H homonuclear and heteronuclear multiple-quantum-filtered NMR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 1999; 137: 295–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Takamiya H, Kusaka Y, Seo Y, Noguchi M, Ikoma K, Morimoto T, Hirasawa Y. Characteristics of proton NMR T2 relaxation of water in the normal and regenerating tendon. Jpn J Physiol 2000; 50: 569–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fullerton GD, Rahal A. Collagen structure: the molecular source of the tendon magic angle effect. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 345–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Muir H, Bullough P, Maroudas A. The distribution of collagen in human articular cartilage with some of its physiological implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1970; 52: 554–563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jeffery AK, Blunn GW, Archer CW, Bentley G. Three-dimensional collagen architecture in bovine articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surgery Br 1991; 73: 795–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hayes CW, Sawyer RW, Conway WF. Patellar cartilage lesions: in-vitro detection and staging with MR imaging and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1990; 176: 479–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Modl JM, Sether LA, Haughton VM, Kneeland JB. Articular cartilage correlation of histologic zones with signal intensity at MR Imaging. Radiology 1991; 18: 853–855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rubenstein JD, Kim JK, Morava-Protzner I, Stanchev PL, Henkelman RM. Effects of collagen orientation on MR imaging characteristics of bovine articular cartilage. Radiology 1993; 188: 219–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Erickson SJ, Prost RW, Timins ME. The “magic angle” effect: background physics and clinical relevance. Radiology 1993; 188: 23–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hayes CW, Parellada JA. The magic angle effect in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 8: 51–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Watson PJ, Carpenter TA, Hall LD, Tyler JA. Cartilage swelling and loss in a spontaneous model of osteoarthritis visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996; 4: 197–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xia Y, Farquhar T, Burton-Wurster N, Lust G. Origin of cartilage laminae in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 887–894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Waldschmidt JG, Rilling RJ, Kajdacsy-Balla AA, Boynton MD, Erickson SJ. In vitro and in vivo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: zonal anatomy, imaging pitfalls, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics 1997; 17: 1387–1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wacker FK, Bolze X, Felsenberg D, Wolf KJ. Orientation-dependent changes in MR signal intensity of articular cartilage: a manifestation of the “magic angle” effect. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27: 306–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xia Y Magic angle effect in MRI of articular cartilage: a review. Invest Radiol 2000; 35: 602–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xia Y, Moody J, Alhadlaq H. Orientational dependence of T2 relaxation in articular cartilage: a microscopic MRI (μMRI) study. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 460–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Seo Y, Ikoma K,Takamiya H, Kusaka Y,Tsoref L, Eliav U, Shinar H, Navon G. 1H double-quantum-filtered MR imaging as a new tool for assessment of healing of the ruptured Achilles tendon. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 884–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, Zarlingo M, Feller JF, Bost FW, Belzer JP, Wischer TK, Genant HK. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 1073–1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alhadlaq H, Xia Y, Moody JB, Matyas J. Detecting structural changes in early experimental osteoarthritis of tibial cartilage by microscopic MRI and polarized light microscopy. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 709–717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shinar H, Eliav U, Keinan-Adamsky K, Navon G. The effect of refocusing the dipolar interaction on the measured T2 of articular cartilage. Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 2002. (Honolulu). p 64. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Akella SV, Regatte RR, Wheaton AJ, Borthakur A, Reddy R. Reduction of residual dipolar interaction in cartilage by spin-lock technique. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 1103–1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eliav U, Shinar H, Navon G. The formation of a second-rank tensor in sodium-23 double-quantum-filtered NMR as an indicator for order in a biological tissue. J Magn Reson 1992; 98: 223–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shinar H, Knubovets T, Eliav U, Navon G. Sodium interaction with ordered structures in mammalian red blood cells detected by Na-23 double quantum NMR. Biophys J 1993; 64: 1273–1279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Eliav U, Navon G. Analysis of double-quantum-filtered NMR spectra of 23Na in biological tissues. Equine Vet J 1994; 26: 29–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sharf Y, Eliav U, Shinar H, Navon G. Detection of anisotropy in cartilage using double-quantum-filtered NMR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson B 1995; 107: 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tsoref L, Shinar H, Seo Y, Eliav U, Navon G. Proton double-quantum filtered MRI: a new method for imaging ordered tissues. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 720–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tsoref L, Shinar H, Navon G. Observation of a 1H double quantum filtered signal of water in biological tissues. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 11–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tsoref L, Eliav U, Seo Y, Shinar H, Navon G. Slice-selective proton double quantum filtered MRI of joint connective tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 336–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Aletras AH, Tsoref L, Navon G. In vivo (1)H double quantum filtered MRI of the human wrist and ankle. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 640–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eliav U, Navon G. Multiple quantum filtered NMR studies of the interaction between collagen and water in the tendon. J Am Chem Soc 2002; 124: 3125–3132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shinar H, Seo Y, Ikoma K, Kusaka Y, Eliav U, Navon G. Mapping the fiber orientation in articular cartilage at rest and under pressure studied by 2H double quantum filtered MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 322–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fechete R, Demco DE, Blumich B, Eliav U, Navon G. Anisotropy of collagen fiber orientation in sheep tendon by 1H double-quantum-filtered NMR signals. J Magn Reson 2003; 162: 166–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Eliav U, Keinan-Adamsky K, Navon G. A new method for suppressing the central transition in I = 3/2 NMR spectra with a demonstration for 23Na in bovine articular cartilage. J Magn Reson 2003; 165: 276–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Keinan-Adamsky K, Shinar H, Navon G. Multinuclear NMR and MRI studies of the maturation of pig articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 532–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Berendsen HJC, Migchelsen C. Hydration structure of fibrous macromolecules. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1965; 125: 365–379. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Berendsen HJ, Migchelsen C. Hydration structure of collagen and influence of salts. Fed Proc 1966; 25: 998–1002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Santyr GE, Henkelman RM, Bronskill MJ. Variation in measured transverse relaxation in tissue resulting from spin locking with the CPMG sequence. J Magn Reson 1988; 79: 28–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Meiboom S Nuclear magnetic resonance study of the proton transfer in water. J Chem Phys 1961; 34: 375–388. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Luz Z, Meiboom S. Rate and mechanism of proton exchange in aqueous solutions of phosphate buffer. J Am Chem Soc 1964; 86: 4764–4766. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES