Abstract
A general protocol for the hydroacylation of styrenes from aliphatic carboxylic acids is reported. These reactions proceed via β-scission of a phophoranyl radical that is accessed by photoredox catalysis, followed by addition of the resulting acyl radical to the styrenyl olefin. We show that phosphine tunability is critical for efficient intermolecular coupling due to competitive quenching of the photocatalyst by the olefin. Primary, secondary, and structurally rigid tertiary carboxylic acids all generate valuable unsymmetrical dialkyl ketones.
Graphical Abstract

Aliphatic ketones are versatile synthetic intermediates and common functional groups found in natural products and pharmaceuticals.1 As a result, the development of mild and general methods for the construction of complex aliphatic ketones is important. Hydroacylation of olefins is one such strategy, as it affords ketones from abundant and structurally diverse feedstocks (Figure 1A). For example, transition metal-catalyzed hydroacylation of olefins with aldehydes has been extensively studied.2 Nevertheless, the propensity of aliphatic aldehydes to undergo decarbonylation has limited the development of intermolecular hydroacylations. Successful examples are most often restricted to the use of aldehydes bearing coordinating functional groups or require the use of high pressures of carbon monoxide to ensure ketone formation.3
Figure 1.
Hydroacylation of olefins with aliphatic carboxylic acids
The addition of acyl radicals to a C–C double bond provides an alternative strategy for joining carbonyl and olefin substrates.4 Hydrogen atom abstraction from aldehydes can furnish acyl radicals that undergo alkene addition. When an aldehyde possesses multiple weak C–H bonds and a highly reactive hydrogen atom abstractor is used, competitive abstractions may occur leading to complex reaction mixtures.4c,5 Additionally, the propensity of aldehydes to undergo autoxidation limits their synthetic utility.6 To overcome this issue, researchers have developed hydroacylation reactions with carbonyl substrates that access acyl radicals via alternative mechanisms, such as singleelectron transfer or direct excitation (Figure 1B).4c-i For example, hydroacylations have recently been developed that couple olefins with acyl silanes4c or α-keto acids,4d-f which undergo oxidative fragmentation to acyl radicals under photoredox catalysis. Activation of acyl derivatives via visible light fragmentation pathways have also been reported.4g-I
While the aforementioned methodologies enable the synthesis of ketones, the substrates for these reactions are often derived from carboxylic acids in multistep synthetic sequences. As a result, the functional group tolerance and step- and redox economy of the hydroacylation reactions are compromised (Figure 1B).7 Given the stability and wide availability of aliphatic carboxylic acids, their direct use for the generation of aliphatic ketones represents an attractive area for development. While the synthesis of ketones from carboxylic acids via cross-coupling has been reported,8 these reactions use a pre-functionalized coupling partner. The hydroacylation of olefins directly with carboxylic acids has been far less developed, with seminal studies from Buchwald and Wang that are branch selective.9
With the Rovis group, we recently reported the C–OH activation of carboxylic acids using phosphines and photoredox catalysis (Figure 1C).10 This work demonstrated that nucleophilic trapping of a phosphine radical cation could be leveraged to release acyl radicals via β-scission from a proposed phosphoranyl radical.11 We showed that the acyl radical intermediate could be trapped with a hydrogen atom to afford aldehydes or trapped with a small subset of intramolecular π-systems to access cyclized products. Given the mild reaction conditions and the success of the intramolecular alkene trapping, we envisioned that translation of this strategy to an intermolecular hydroacylation would deliver a linear-selective synthesis of valuable unsymmetrical dialkyl ketones directly from carboxylic acid and olefin feedstocks. Recent work by Zhu and coworkers demonstrated the feasibility of this concept using triphenyl phosphine (PPh3) and aromatic carboxylic acids.12 However, no reactivity was observed with aliphatic carboxylic acids.
Our initial attempts to effect the intermolecular hydroacylation between hydrocinnamic acid 1 and 1,1-diphenyl ethylene 2 sought to use the same phosphines that we had previously reported for the reduction of acids to aldehydes.10 However, both PPh3 and ethyl diphenyl phosphinite (P(OEt)Ph2) delivered less than 10% yield of product 3 under our previously optimized conditions, and optimization of standard reaction parameters failed to deliver significant improvements with these phosphines (See SI). Since the primary difference between our previous study and this work was the presence of alkene, we reasoned that electron or energy transfer to the alkene was inhibiting formation of the phosphine radical cation, which was leading to poor reactivity.13 Indeed, emission quenching experiments of the reaction components demonstrated that diphenyl ethylene quenched the excited state of the photocatalyst over two times faster than PPh3 or P(OEt)Ph2 (Figure 2A). Thus, we hypothesized that to achieve productive reactivity, we would need to use more electron-rich phosphines with lower oxidation potentials that could outcompete electron or energy transfer to the alkene (Figure S1).14 A qualitative trend between yield and electron transfer rate for different phosphines was observed under optimized conditions, providing support for this proposal (Figure 2B).15 Ultimately, commercially available dimethyl phenyl phosphine accomplished the intermolecular coupling in 81% 1H-NMR yield in 24 h.16 Control studies confirmed that phosphine, light, and photocatalyst were all necessary reaction components for reactivity (Table S9).
Figure 2.
(A) Emission quenching plot of [Ir(dF-Me-ppy)2dtbppy]PF6 with diphenyl ethylene and phosphines. (dF-Me-ppy) = 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-5-methyl pyridine; dtbbpy = 4,4′-ditert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine. DPE = diphenyl ethylene. (B) Reactivity studies with different phosphines. a1H-NMR yield determined using 1-fluoronaphthalene as external standard. KSV = Kqτ0 ; Kq = bimolecular quenching rate constant, τ0 = excited state lifetime in the absence of quencher. See reference 16 for information on Blue LEDs.
With optimized reaction conditions,17 the scope of this hydroacylation protocol was explored with commercially available carboxylic acids (Figure 3A). A variety of electron-deficient and electron-rich substituted hydrocinnamic acids were competent substrates (4 – 9). Of note are hydrocinnamic acids 4 and 6, since traditional methods for ketone generation, such as the use of excess Grignard reagent, would afford poor chemoselectivity due to the pendant nitrile and ester.18 Various heteroaromatic carboxylic acids were also tolerated. Oxazole 10, indole 11, thiophene 12, and pyrazole 23 underwent hydroacylation in moderate to good yield. Acetic acid, which is produced annually on a multimillion-ton scale,19 delivered the hydroacylated product in 76% yield. The hydroacylation with acetic acid was easily scaled to a 10 mmol scale, which afforded the ketone product in 48% yield under solvent-free conditions. Simple aliphatic carboxylic acids (14 – 17) showed high reactivity. Primary acids containing distal internal alkenes like oleic acid 18 and citronellic acid 20 were coupled in good yield. Biotin 21 and an aspartic acid derivative 22 were tolerated in the reaction, highlighting the potential for the use of this methodology in late-stage functionalization or bioconjugation chemistry. Additionally, secondary carboxylic acids were also amenable to hydroacylation. Three to six-membered ring carboxylic acids were coupled in good yield without suffering decarboxylation (27 – 30). However, depressed yields were observed with tertiary carboxylic acids (Figure S2), due to decarboxylation and competitive addition of the resulting alkyl radical into diphenyl ethylene.20 Nonetheless, structurally rigid tertiary carboxylic acids such as adamantane and norbornane derivatives (31 and 32) provided the ketone product in good yield.
Figure 3.
aReactions run with 2.4 equivalents of PMe2Ph and without Ph2S2. bReactions run with 2.4 equivalents of PMe2Ph and at 0.33 M in MeCN. cReactions run at 0.25 M in MeCN. dReactions run with 2.4 equivalents of PMe2Ph, in 0.25 M DMA, on a 0.25 mmol scale with 6 equivalents of alkene. e 1H-NMR yield determined using 1-fluoronaphthalene as external standard. f The reaction was run neat.
In addition to the carboxylic acid scope, various substituted styrene acceptors were explored (Figure 3B). Both electron-deficient and electron-rich diphenyl ethylene derivatives underwent hydroacylation efficiently (33 and 34). Comparable reactivity was observed using halogenated a-methyl styrene derivatives (38 and 39), which provide a handle for further functionalization of the product. Although lower yielding, more sterically demanding alkene 35 was coupled in 48% yield. Reactivity was restored using the less sterically hindered cyclic alkene 36, which furnished the ketone product in 66% yield. A current limitation is that electron-rich and neutral unsubstituted styrenes provide only moderate yield (30–40%) of the hydroacylation products under optimized reaction conditions (Figure S3).
Mechanistically, upon acyl radical addition into the olefin, hydrogen atom transfer or a reduction-protonation sequence could result in the formation of the product. In our report on the reduction of carboxylic acids to aldehydes, we proposed that hydrogen atom transfer to the acyl radical furnished product. In Zhu and coworkers’ aromatic acid hydroacylation, they suggest a reduction-protonation mechanism is operative. To probe these two pathways, we subjected acetic acid and 1,1-diphenyl ethylene to the standard reaction conditions in acetonitrile-d3 (Figure 4A). No deuterium incorporation was observed revealing that hydrogen atom transfer from solvent does not take place. The use of acetic acid-d1 under the standard reaction conditions, on the other hand, showed 33% D-incorporation over 24 hours. Deuterium incorporation into the enolizable C–H bonds of the product was also detected, indicating that isotope exchange by a polar mechanism likely decreases the efficiency of D incorporation at the methine site (See SI). Indeed, after 25 minutes, 86% D-incorporation at the methine position was observed. These findings are consistent with either a reduction-protonation sequence or hydrogen atom transfer from thiophenol. However, in the absence of diphenyl disulfide, deuterium incorporation was also observed at similar levels; taken together, these results suggest that a reduction-protonation sequence is most likely operative both in the presence and absence of diphenyl disulfide.21
Figure 4.
(A) Deuterium labeling experiments. Deuterium incorporation was determined by quantitative 13C-NMR. Yield of product was determined using 1-fluoronaphthalene as external standard. (B) Proposed mechanism of the hydroacylation of aliphatic acids with alkenes using phosphines.
These experiments and the emission quenching studies presented at the outset lend support for the mechanism proposed in Figure 4B. Initial visible light excitation of [Ir(dF-Me-ppy)2dtbppy]PF6 (41) enables a long-lived excited state 42 that can serve as a one electron oxidant (*E1/2 (III/II) = +0.97 V vs SCE in MeCN) for dimethyl phenyl phosphine (Ep = +0.89 V vs SCE in MeCN), generating phosphine radical cation 43.22 Nucleophilic trapping of the radical cation with the deprotonated carboxylic acid results in formation of a phosphoranyl radical 44, followed by β–scission to generate an acyl radical. Addition into an alkene results in formation of aliphatic radical 45, which is reduced to the anion with the reduced form of the photocatalyst (46).23 Subsequent proton transfer from 47 results in product formation.12,24
In summary, a mild methodology for the hydroacylation of styrenyl olefins with carboxylic acids has been developed. Aliphatic acyl radicals are accessed from a phosphoranyl radical that is generated directly from a phosphine and a carboxylic acid. Key to the success of this reaction was tuning the phosphine for efficient electron transfer, which enabled hydroacylation with a diverse selection of aliphatic acids to afford valuable dialkyl ketone products.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank the MacMillan lab (Princeton University) for access to their Photoreactors and Lotus Separations for assistance with a purification. Financial support for this project was provided by NIGMS R35 GM126986.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.
Experimental procedures, optimization data, characterization data, and mechanistic data (PDF)
REFERENCES
- (1).Kvaerno L; Carreira EM Classics in Stereoselective Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons: Germany, Weinheim, 2009. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fischbach MA; Walsh CT Chem. Rev 2006, 106, 3468–3496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Prasad PK; Reddi RN; Arumugam S Org. Biomol. Chem 2018, 16, 9334–9348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).For recent reviews:(a) Willis MC Chem. Rev 2010, 110, 725–748.(b) Willis MC Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II. 2014, 4, 961–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).(a) (b) (c) For select examples:Leung JC; Krische MJ Chem. Sci 2012, 3, 2202–2209.Young JP; Park JW; Jun CH Acc. Chem. Res 2008, 41, 222,–234.Murphy SK; Bruch A; Dong VM Chem. Sci 2015, 6, 174–180. [Google Scholar]; (d) (e) Tsuji Y, Yoshii S, Ohsumi T, Kondo T and Watanabe Y, J. Organomet. Chem 1987, 331, 379–385.Kondo T, Akazome M, Tsuji Y and Watanabe Y, J. Org. Chem 1990, 55, 1286–1291. [Google Scholar]
- (4).(a) Caronna T; Minisci F Chem. Rev 1973, 1, 263–318. [Google Scholar]; (b) Raviola C; Protti S; Ravelli D; Fagnoni M Green Chem. 2019, 21, 748–764. [Google Scholar]; (c) Capaldo L; Riccardi R; Ravelli D; Fagnoni M ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 304–309. [Google Scholar]; (d) Chu L; Lipshultz JM; MacMillan DWC Angew. Chem, Int. Ed 2015, 54, 7929–7933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zhao JJ; Zhang HH; Shen X; Yu S Org. Lett 2019, 21, 913–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Morack T; Mück-Lichtenfeld C; Gilmour R Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2019, 58, 1208–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Goti G; Bieszczad B; Vega-Peñaloza A; Melchiorre P Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2019, 58, 1213–1217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Ociepa M; Baka O; Narodowiec J; Gryko D Adv. Synth. Catal 2017, 359, 3560–3565. [Google Scholar]; (i) Fan X; Lei T; Chen B; Tung CH; Wu LZ Org. Lett 2019, 21, 4153–4158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).For an example of a cross-coupling reaction that proceeds by HAT with aldehydes with particularly high chemoselectivity, see: Zhang X; MacMillan DWC J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 11353–11356.28780856 [Google Scholar]
- (6).Vanoye L; Favre-Réguillon A; Aloui A; Philippe R; De Bellefon C RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 18931–18937. [Google Scholar]
- (7).Burns NZ; Baran PS; Hoffmann RW Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2009, 48, 2854–2867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).For recent examples, see: Ni S; Padial NM; Kingston C; Vantourout JC; Schmitt DC; Edwards JT; Kruszyk MM; Merchant RR; Mykhailiuk PK; Sanchez BB; Yang S; Perry MA; Gallego GM; Mousseau JJ; Collins MR; Cherney RJ; Lebed PS; Chen JS; Qin T; Baran PS J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 6726–6739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang J; Cary BP; Beyer PD; Gellman SH; Weix DJ Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2019, 58, 12081–12085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Amani J; Molander GA Org. Lett 2017, 19, 3612–3615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).(a) Zhou Y; Bandar JS; Buchwald SL J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 8126–8129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) He J; Song P; Xu X; Zhu S; Wang Y ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 3253–3259. [Google Scholar]
- (10).Stache EE; Ertel AB; Rovis T; Doyle AG ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11134–11139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).(a) Marque S; Tordo P Curr. Chem 2005, 250, 43. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bentrude WG; Hansen ER; Khan WA; Min TB; Rogers PE J. Am. Chem. Soc 1973, 95, 2286–2293. [Google Scholar]
- (12).Zhang M; Xie J; Zhu C Nat. Commun 2018, 9, 3517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Lu Z; Yoon TP Angew. Chemie, Int. Ed 2012, 51, 10329–10332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Budnikova YG, Kargin YM Russian Journal of General Chemistry 2001, 71, 1393–1421. [Google Scholar]
- (15).A similar trend between yield and electron transfer rate was also observed with 2-(trifluoromethyl) styrene (KSV = 268). Notably, an increase in yield was observed with 2-(trifluoromethyl) styrene relative to diphenyl ethylene for triphenyl phosphine and ethyl diphenyl phosphinite, which is consistent with the competitive quenching proposal. See Table S10.
- (16).While Kessils provide similar reactivity under optimized conditions (Scale: 0.2 mmol – 64% 1H-NMR Yield), a photoreactor was used to provide a standardized light and temperature reaction set up. For optical properties of the photoreactor see: Le C; Wismer MK; Shi Z-C; Zhang R; Conway DV; Li G; Vachal P; Davies IW; MacMillan DW Acs. Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 647–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).The products from hydroacylation with nonpolar aliphatic acids were easier to isolate when the reactions were conducted in the absence of diphenyl disulfide. In these cases, additional phosphine was added to compensate for the slightly reduced yield.
- (18).Ahn Yoonmo; Cohen T Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 203–206. [Google Scholar]
- (19).Le Berre C; Serp P; Kalck P; Torrence GP Acetic Acid Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry [Online]; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.; Posted March 26, 2014. Doi: 10.1002/14356007.a01_045.pub3 (accessed Oct. 7, 2019). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Decarbonylation may also be operative. For a general review on decarboxylative transformations with carboxylic acids, see: Schwarz J; König B Green Chem. 2018, 20,323–361. [Google Scholar]
- (21).The excited state of the photocatalyst is not quenched by diphenyl disulfide (See SI). Therefore, one possibility is that the reduction of diphenyl disulfide is competitive with the reduction of alkyl radical G, which leads to competitive hydrogen atom transfer from solvent to furnish product.
- (22).(a) Lowry MS; Goldsmith JI; Slinker JD; Rohl R; Pascal RA; Malliaras GG; Bernhard S Chem. Mater 2005, 17, 5712–5719. (b)Ep = 0.89 V vs SCE in MeCN for dimethyl phenyl phosphine. [Google Scholar]
- (23).Houmam A; Wayner DDM Acta Chemica Scandinavica 1998, 52, 377–384. [Google Scholar]
- (24).A reduction protonation mechanism was also proposed in the activation of oximes with phosphines. Xia PJ; Ye ZP; Hu YZ; Song D; Xiang HY; Chen XQ; Yang H Org. Lett 2019, 21, 2658–2662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




