Abstract
Despite universal susceptibility to β-lactams, resistance to second-line antimicrobials (e.g. erythromycin) is increasingly common among group A Streptococcus (GAS). To better understand the frequency of regional GAS antimicrobial resistance, we screened a previously described GAS strain collection from Houston, TX, USA, for resistance to commonly used antimicrobials. A total of 100/929 (10.8 %) showed resistance to at least one antimicrobial. Tetracycline resistance was identified in 52 (5.6 %) GAS strains. The cumulative frequency of erythromycin and clindamycin resistance [macrolide (M) and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin (MLS) phenotypes] was greatest among invasive GAS strains (9.9 %) compared to that of strains derived from any other infection type (5.9 %, P=0.045). We identified emm types 11, 75, 77 and 92 as the only emm types with high (e.g. >50 %) within-emm type resistance and contributing to the majority (24/26; 92 %) of erythromycin/clindamycin resistance in invasive GAS. High-frequency resistance emm types were also significantly overrepresented in invasive GAS strains as indicated by invasive index. We performed whole-genome sequencing to define genetic elements associated with resistance among emm types 11, 75, 77 and 92. Diverse mobile elements contributed to GAS resistance including transposons, integrative conjugative elements, prophage and a plasmid. Phylogenetic analysis suggests recent clonal emergence of emm92 GAS strains. Our findings indicate that less frequently encountered GAS emm types disproportionately contribute to resistance phenotypes, are defined by diverse mobile genetic elements and may favour invasive disease.
Keywords: group A Streptococcus, invasive, skin and soft tissue, pharyngitis, antimicrobial resistance, emm type
Data Summary
All raw genome sequences generated in this study are publicly available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under BioProject accession number PRJNA494557. Comparative phylogenomics analysis was conducted using publicly available data from the NCBI under BioProject numbers PRJNA395240 and PRJEB13551, as described in Methods, and the data are listed in Data Bibliography. The programs used to analyse raw sequence reads, for polymorphism discovery, and whole-genome sequence based phylogenies are available for download as described in the Supplementary Material. The CLC Genomics Workbench is available for purchase at www.qiagenbioinformatics.com
Impact Statement.
Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a human pathogen responsible for a wide range of diseases. GAS strains are universally susceptible to penicillin, with no history of resistance to this class of antibiotics. However, use of second-line agents such as macrolides (e.g. erythromycin) has increased dramatically for relatively benign conditions, such as pharyngitis. Concomitantly, resistance to second-line antimicrobials in GAS has increased to the point that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention considers macrolide resistance in GAS a ‘concerning level’ threat. We sought to examine the frequency of antimicrobial resistance among paediatric GAS strains collected in Houston, TX, USA. While overall frequency of antimicrobial resistance was low (10 %), we observed a significant association between antimicrobial resistance for any class of antibiotic and invasive disease. Despite constituting only 7 % of the GAS strain population, GAS strains of emm types 11, 75, 77 and 92 were responsible for the majority of observed resistance. Whole-genome sequencing of resistant strains revealed that a variety of mobile genetic elements contributed to the observed antimicrobial-resistance phenotypes. Our findings of a correlation between high-frequency antimicrobial resistance encoded in mobile genetic elements and GAS invasive disease warrant continued surveillance, and further investigation of the relationship between antimicrobial resistance and strain virulence in GAS.
Introduction
Streptococcus pyogenes (group A Streptococcus ; GAS) is a ubiquitous, obligate, human pathogen capable of causing a wide range of diseases. Most frequently, GAS is responsible for relatively benign diseases, such as pharyngitis or superficial skin infections. However, a small subset of so-called ‘benign’ disease manifestations may develop into more severe, life-threatening diseases, such as toxic shock syndrome and necrotizing fasciitis. Invasive disease occurs at a rate of 3–5 cases/100 000 population in the USA, and displays a bimodal age distribution with peaks in the young (<5 years) and elderly (>65 years) [1]. In addition to disease, GAS may also be carried in the throat in the absence of symptoms and such asymptomatic carriage is most common in children aged 5–15 years [2].
Despite the use of penicillin in humans for over 75 years, GAS strains continue to be universally susceptible to it and, thus, penicillin and penicillin-based antimicrobials remain the recommended therapy for infections caused by GAS. However, in cases of penicillin allergy, second-line antimicrobials such as macrolides (e.g. erythromycin and azithromycin), lincosamides (e.g. clindamycin) and tetracyclines are effective therapies [3]. Due to the high frequency of asymptomatic carriage in children, when eradication of the carrier state is desired, second-line agents have proven to be more effective [3]. Use of macrolides and clindamycin has become more common in many paediatric settings as empiric therapy for skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) and respiratory infection, and may contribute to increased resistance [4, 5]. The potential for increased second-line agent resistance in GAS has led to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to identify macrolide-resistant GAS as a potential emerging threat [6].
With respect to antimicrobial-resistance mechanisms, GAS strains share similar traits to other streptococci and staphylococci, including mobile genetic elements that confer resistance. Perhaps most common among them are transposons, specifically Tn916, that may carry resistance genes for tetracyclines, macrolides and aminoglycosides [7]. In addition to transposons, GAS may carry prophage, integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) and plasmids that possess any number of antimicrobial-resistance factors [8]. Few studies have examined the mobile elements in diverse GAS strains derived from comprehensive surveillance on a local or national level.
We previously described the molecular epidemiology of GAS disease in children in the Houston, TX, metropolitan area (USA) over the course of 4 years (July 2013–2017) [9]. In that study, 930 GAS isolates were identified by convenience sampling of Texas Children’s Hospital (Houston, TX, USA) patients with a GAS-positive culture result. In this study, we screened those GAS isolates for resistance to common antimicrobials used in paediatrics to better understand the frequency of resistance, association of resistance phenotypes to GAS emm and disease types, and genetic elements associated with resistance.
Methods
Description of the GAS strain collection in Houston, TX
The description of the 930 GAS isolates, disease definitions and methods, including molecular typing, have been previously published [9]. Isolates were collected under a protocol approved by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Texas Health Sciences Center (Houston, USA). One isolate was not tested for antimicrobial susceptibility due to non-viability. Very briefly, GAS strains were collected from leftover patient samples with a GAS-positive culture result by the clinical microbiology laboratory at the Texas Children’s Hospital from July 1 2013 to June 30 2017. Strains were emm typed and assigned a disease category of invasive (n=263), SSTI (n=235) or pharyngeal (n=431), excluding isolates recovered from asymptomatic cases as previously described [9].
Bacterial growth and susceptibility testing
GAS strains were grown using trypticase soy agar supplemented with 5 % sheep blood (SBA), in Todd–Hewitt broth supplemented with 0.2 % yeast extract (THY) or on THY agar. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol was followed for antimicrobial disc diffusion susceptibility testing [10]. Strains were grown on BD BBL Mueller–Hinton agar with 5 % sheep blood at 37 °C supplemented with 5 % CO2. Zones of inhibition were measured using digital callipers following a minimum of 18 h of growth. Interpretations (susceptible, intermediate or resistant) were made using CLSI breakpoints for β-haemolytic streptococci [10]. Antimicrobial discs (BD Sensi-Disc; ThermoFisher) included chloramphenicol (30 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), penicillin (10 U) and tetracycline (30 µg). Clindamycin and erythromycin discs were placed adjacent to each other to identify inducible resistance to clindamycin (D-test). Resistance phenotypes to erythromycin, clindamycin and tetracycline were confirmed using an Etest (bioMérieux). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to aminoglycosides (streptomycin, kanamycin and gentamicin) were determined in emm11 and emm92 strains using broth microdilution or an Etest. For broth microdilution, strains were grown to an OD600 1.0 in THY broth, diluted 1 : 50 in fresh THY broth, serially diluted with the desired antimicrobial in a 96-well plate, and growth monitored using a BioTek Synergy H1 plate reader. Strains were prepared for Etest as described above for disc diffusion.
Bacterial DNA extraction, library preparation, whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics
GAS strains of emm11 (n=11), emm75 (n=17), emm77 (n=22) and emm92 (n=11) were grown on SBA and inspected for purity prior to DNA extraction. DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen) with modifications for Gram-positive bacteria as we have previously described [11]. DNA quantity and quality were measured using a NanoDrop instrument and Qubit. Short-read sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina Nextera flex sequencing kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions and 300 bp paired-end sequence obtained using an Illumina MiSeq instrument. Long-read sequencing libraries were prepared using the Oxford Nanopore rapid barcoding kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions and sequence obtained using an Oxford Nanopore GridION instrument. Complete genome assembly was performed using both long- and short-read sequences for TSPY155 (emm11), TSPY208 (emm75), TSPY165 (emm77), TSPY453 (emm77) and TSPY556 (emm92). Details of bioinformatic methods used for genome assembly, polymorphism discovery and phylogenetics are provided in the Supplementary Material.
Comparison to publicly available GAS genome sequences
Large collections of GAS genome sequences are available through the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Specifically, beginning in 2015, the CDC Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs) programme began sequencing all GAS invasive isolates [12]. Currently, over 5000 invasive GAS isolates have been sequenced spanning the years 2015–2017 and are publicly available (BioProject accession number PRJNA395240). Available data include 1454 GAS strains from 2015 [12] and 3843 GAS strains from 2016 to 2017 (unpublished). Further, whole-genome sequences for over 500 GAS isolates were deposited by Public Health England (PHE) in 2014 as part of a study to investigate an increase in scarlet fever (BioProject accession number PRJEB13551) [13]. Together, the two datasets (ABCs and PHE) provide temporally matched and geographically diverse GAS strains for comparison to our study population in Houston, TX, USA. A summary of the available GAS strain sequences (including those sequenced in the current study) is provided in Tables S1–S3, (available with the online version of this article).
Statistics
Invasive indices for individual emm types were calculated by dividing the frequency of occurrence in invasive disease by the frequency of occurrence in pharyngeal disease. A resistance ratio was calculated by dividing the observed frequency of resistance to any antimicrobial within a single emm type by the frequency of resistance in the reference population. For example, to calculate the resistance ratio for emm12 GAS, we divided the observed rate of resistance (any antimicrobial) within emm12 (5/145) by the expected rate of resistance within the total population (100/929). Comparisons in the frequency of antimicrobial resistance between disease types were performed using Fisher’s exact test. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare invasive indices and resistance ratios between high- and low-frequency resistant groups. All calculations were performed in GraphPad/Prism v 8. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant for all statistical tests.
Sequence data availability
All short- and long-read sequencing data has been deposited at the NCBI under BioProject accession number PRJNA494557. Complete genome sequence is available at the NCBI for TSPY155 (CP032699), TSPY165 (CP033336), TSPY208 (CP033335), TSPY453 (CP033337) and TSPY556 (CP032700 and CP032701).
Results
High rates of antimicrobial resistance associated with particular emm and disease types
We identified a total of 100 (10.8 %) GAS strains with resistance to at least one antimicrobial. A summary of the observed resistance phenotypes is given in Table 1. All GAS strains showed susceptibility to penicillin (data not shown). Tetracycline resistance was observed in 52 GAS strains (5.6 %). Using a combination of disc diffusion and MICs, we categorized resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin as M (macrolide resistance only), cMLS (constitutive resistance to macrolides and lincosamides) or iMLS (resistance to macrolide and inducible resistance to clindamycin) phenotypes. A total of 65 (7.0 %) GAS strains were identified with M/MLS (macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin) phenotypes with iMLS accounting for the majority (39/65, 60 %) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Resistance phenotype |
INV (%) [n=263] |
SSTI (%) [n=235] |
PHG (%) [n=431] |
Total (%) [n=929] |
---|---|---|---|---|
M/MLS M cMLS iMLS |
26 (9.9)* 6 (2.3) 8 (3.0) 12 (4.6) |
22 (9.4) – 4 (1.7) 18 (7.7) |
17 (3.9)† 6 (1.4) 2 (0.5) 9 (2.1) |
65 (7.0) 12 (1.3) 14 (1.5) 39 (4.2) |
TE |
15 (5.7) |
20 (8.3)* |
17 (3.9)† |
52 (5.6) |
TOTAL‡ |
33 (12.5)* |
34 (14.5)* |
33 (7.7)† |
100 (10.8) |
*P<0.05 (Fisher’s exact test) compared to pharyngitis.
†P<0.05 (Fisher’s exact test) compared to combined non-pharyngeal (invasive+SSTI).
‡Total includes 6 GAS isolates with resistance to chloramphenicol (n=5) and levofloxacin (n=1).
cMLS, Constitutive MLS; iMLS, inducible MLS; INV, invasive; M, macrolide; MLS, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin; PHG, pharyngeal; TE, tetracycline.
We discovered unique relationships when examining the frequency of any antimicrobial resistance within emm types. Among emm types with at least 10 observations, we found that emm types 11, 75, 77 and 92 had high-frequency (e.g. >50 %) within-emm type resistance (Fig. 1a, Table S4). Collectively, the four emm types showed >85 % resistance to at least one antimicrobial but constituted<7 % of the GAS strain population – an eightfold greater frequency (i.e. resistance ratio, see Methods) than expected compared to all other emm types (P=0.003). The observed significance was not due to a single resistance phenotype among the high-resistance emm types but, rather, to both tetracycline (1.1 versus 72.1 %, P<0.0001) and M/MLS (2.1 versus 49.2 %, P<0.0001) resistance phenotypes (Table S4).
Using GAS disease type definitions established in our original molecular epidemiology study [9], we compared the frequency of resistance phenotypes between GAS strains derived from invasive infection, SSTI and pharyngeal infection. We observed a significantly higher frequency of any resistance phenotype in non-pharyngeal (i.e. invasive and SSTI) strains (67/498, 13.5 %; Table 1) compared to pharyngeal-derived GAS (33/431, 7.7 %, P=0.0042). The significantly higher frequency of resistance in non-pharyngeal GAS strains was retained when comparing tetracycline resistance (7.0 versus 3.9 %, P=0.045) and for M/MLS (9.6 versus 3.9 %, P=0.0007). Moreover, GAS emm types 11, 75, 77 and 92 accounted for the majority of strains with any resistance phenotype in the invasive group (24/33, 72.7 %) (Tables 1 and Table S4). Given that emm types 11, 75, 77 and 92 showed high within-emm type resistance rates and accounted for the majority of MLS resistance among invasive strains, we next postulated that the high-frequency resistant emm types were more prevalent in invasive compared to pharyngeal disease. The GAS invasive index is defined as the frequency of emm type occurrence in invasive disease divided by the frequency of the same emm type in pharyngeal disease derived from the same population over a similar time period and is considered an indicator of the invasive potential of a GAS emm type. Surprisingly, we observed a direct relationship between the frequency of any antimicrobial resistance and invasive index (Fig. 1b). Additionally, we calculated cumulative invasive indices and resistance ratios (see Methods) and compared high- and low-frequency resistant emm types. We observed a significantly greater invasive index (2.70 versus 0.96, P=0.03) and resistance ratio (8.07 versus 0.26, P=0.003) in high-frequency compared to low-frequency resistant emm types, respectively (Table S4, Fig. 1b). These data suggest overrepresentation of high-frequency resistance strains in invasive disease compared to low-resistance emm types.
Whole-genome sequencing of high-frequency resistant GAS emm types reveals distinct differences and similarities in mobile genetic element content
We sought to better understand the genes and mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance in emm types with high-frequency resistance (emm11, emm75, emm77 and emm92). Using both long- and short-read genome sequences (see Methods), we sequenced to completion representative genomes of each high-frequency resistant emm type (Table S5). Whole-genome sequence (short-read only) was obtained from the remaining emm11 (n=10), emm75 (n=16), emm77 (n=21) and emm92 (n=10) GAS isolates for comparison to their respective completed, reference genome. In addition to our local GAS strain collection, we compared genome sequences from temporally matched GAS emm types from the CDC ABCs [12] and PHE, UK [13] (see Tables S1–S3 and Methods).
e mm11 GAS strains are defined by the presence of Tn916 and Tn916-like elements
Tetracycline resistance, tet(M), was most common among emm11 GAS strains in Houston, TX, occurring in 82 % (Table 2) of isolates. Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance conferred by erm(B) was present in 7/11 (63.6 %) isolates. In contrast, a cluster of 21 strains from the CDC collection contained the erm(A) gene, but did not include any strains from Houston (Fig. S1). GAS emm11 strains were not identified in the 2014 PHE, UK collection. Three Houston isolates contained a gene for aminoglycoside resistance [aph(3')-III] resulting in high-level resistance to kanamycin, but susceptibility to streptomycin and gentamicin (Table S6). All resistance genes were found on Tn916 or the closely related Tn6002 or Tn6003 (Fig. 2a, Table 2). Comparing our isolates to the geographically diverse GAS collection from the CDC, we found high conservation of Tn6002 and Tn6003 mobile elements (Table 2, Fig. S1). It has been previously noted that spontaneous excision of the macrolide-aminoglycoside-streptothricin (MAS) element from Tn6003 may result in the formation of Tn6002 (Fig. 2a), potentially contributing to the variable aminoglycoside resistance identified in both the Houston and CDC collections [14].
Table 2.
emm |
MGE |
Resistance genes* |
Strain count (%) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Houston |
CDC/UK |
|||
11 |
Tn916 Tn6002 Tn6003 |
tet(M) tet(M), erm(B) tet(M), erm(B), aph(3')-III |
2 (18.2) 4 (36.4) 3 (27.3) |
2 (1.0) 58 (29.1) 79 (39.7) |
75 |
M75.2/ϕ1207.3† Tn916 |
mef(A), msr(D) tet(M) |
8 (42.1) 2 (10.5) |
12 (12.7) 9 (9.6)‡ |
77 |
Tn916 ICESpyM77.1 ICESpyM77.2 |
tet(M) tet(O) tet(O), erm(A) |
3 (13.6) 12 (54.5) 7 (31.8) |
28 (14.4) 57 (29.2) 72 (36.9)§ |
92 |
ICESpyM92 pRW35|| |
tet(M), ant (6) -Ia, aph(3′)-III erm(T) |
11 (100) 11 (100) |
233 (98.3) 228 (96.2) |
*Resistance genes defined by the presence in the Houston, TX, collection.
†High identity (>99 %) of M75.2 to ϕ1207.3 [15].
‡No UK emm75 GAS strains contained resistance elements. All nine CDC GAS isolates possessed Tn6002.
§Does not include 23 CDC GAS strains with erm(T)/tet(M) genotype.
||Presence of ICESpyM92 and plasmid pRW35 [17] not mutually exclusive.
mobile genetic element (MGE); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); United Kingdom (UK)
Macrolide resistance in Houston emm75 GAS is attributable to prophage 1207.3
Resistance to erythromycin in emm75 GAS from Houston was attributable to the presence of mef(A)/msr(D) in eight (47.1 %) strains (Table 2). Whole-genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of emm75 GAS from Houston (n=17), CDC (n=88) and PHE, UK (n=17) collections revealed two clusters, consisting of distinct multilocus sequence types (STs), and each with variable resistance phenotypes/genotypes (Fig. S2). GAS strains from Houston were found in both clusters, but were most frequent in the cluster with macrolide resistance due to mef(A)/msr(D) carried on Tn1207.1 that is embedded within a prophage. The prophage (M75.2) is identical to that previously described conferring macrolide resistance in GAS (ϕ1207.3; Fig. 2b) [15]. Distinctly, UK emm75 GAS isolates clustered together and lacked any identifiable resistance genes. A small cluster (n=9) of CDC emm75 strains contained erm(B) and tet(M), presumably due to Tn6002.
ICEs are the predominant resistance-carrying mobile elements among emm77
The most common mobile genetic elements identified were ICEs among emm77 and emm92 GAS. Phylogenetic analysis of the emm77 GAS isolates across all compared collections showed three clusters with distinct STs (Fig. S3). The primary cluster (ST63) was defined by the presence of a tet(O)- or tet(O)/erm(A)-containing ICEs (ICESpyM77.1 and ICESpyM77.2, respectively) and included the majority (19/22) of the Houston emm77 GAS strains (Figs 2c and S3, Table 2). The remaining clusters consisted of two separate and distinct multilocus STs (ST133 and ST399) defined by the presence of Tn916-like elements differing from the ICE-containing emm77 (ST63). Interestingly, a single Houston erm(A)-positive emm77 GAS strain (TSPY453) showed constitutive resistance (cMLS) to clindamycin (Table S7). Mutations in the nucleotide sequence encoding the leader peptide immediately upstream of erm(A) are known to alter resistance phenotypes in GAS and other organisms [16]. We compared the upstream sequences of erm(A) in the seven Houston emm77 strains and discovered two single nucleotide changes in TSPY453 that may alter erm(A) transcription, yielding the observed phenotype (Fig. S4).
e mm92 GAS strains appear to be highly clonal in the USA suggesting recent emergence
The Houston emm92 GAS strains displayed uniform resistance phenotypes and represent one of the only GAS emm types to be consistently associated with a plasmid [17]. The ICE identified in emm92 (Fig. 2d) carried tetracycline resistance [tet(M)] and showed highest similarity to an ICE in NGAS322 (emm114) [18]. However, in contrast to the NGAS322 ICE, the ICE identified in emm92 carried genes predicted to impart high-level aminoglycoside resistance [ant(6)-Ia and aph(3′)-III]. We performed MIC determinations to several aminoglycosides and confirmed high-level resistance in the Houston emm92 GAS strains (Table S6). Resistance to erythromycin and inducible resistance to clindamycin (iMLS phenotype) is the result of erm(T) carried on a previously described plasmid (pRW35) [17]. Importantly, the ICE conferring tetracycline and aminoglycoside resistance and the plasmid conferring the iMLS resistance phenotype appear to be highly conserved among emm92 strains in the USA (Table 2).
Whole-genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of Houston and CDC ABCs emm92 GAS strains (none were identified in the 2014 UK study) [13, 12] revealed a highly clonal population belonging to the same ST that differed by a mean of only 20 SNPs, including several clusters of phylogenetically indistinguishable isolates from the reference (TSPY556) (Fig. 3). The majority (10/11) of the Houston emm92 GAS isolates cluster very closely to the reference, differing by a mean of only 10 SNPs (range 3–17 SNPs) from TSPY556. Apart from a cluster of three isolates (Fig. 3), all emm92 GAS strains contained identical mobile elements (e.g. ICE, plasmid and prophage).
Discussion
Our study is one of the first to show a relationship between antimicrobial resistance and disease phenotype in GAS. Resistance to second-line antimicrobials has been identified as an emerging threat in the treatment of the diverse infections caused by GAS [6]. Multiple studies have described resistance patterns within single GAS emm types or clusters of infections, but few have examined associations between antimicrobial resistance and GAS disease types. Our data indicate that a small number of emm types disproportionately contribute to the overall antimicrobial resistance in our Houston GAS strain population. In addition, we show that emm types with high-frequency resistance are overrepresented among invasive compared to pharyngeal strains. Our findings were made possible through comprehensive disease surveillance (invasive, SSTI and pharyngeal), and emphasizes the need for continued and expanded surveillance in our and other communities. While the described emm types may not be highly prevalent, the high rates of antimicrobial resistance associated with the potential for enhanced virulence should cause concern among clinicians.
The rate of resistance to any antimicrobial (10.8 %) we observed is less than that in larger, nationwide studies conducted by the CDC ABCs (22.6 %) [12]. Higher antimicrobial-resistance frequencies have been reported, but tend to be limited to single emm types within a given community or locale. We observed macrolide resistance in 7 % of our GAS isolates. A large, multi-centre study examining pharyngeal GAS strains over a 3 year period (2000–2003) showed modest (4.1 %) resistance to macrolides [19] – similar to the rate of resistance observed in Houston pharyngeal strains (3.9 %). In 2015, nearly 14 % of the CDC ABCs invasive collection showed macrolide resistance [12], which may reflect differences in disease (invasive versus pharyngeal), but the two studies were performed on different populations and at different points in time. Examination of GAS macrolide resistance in the USA between 2002 and 2003 showed 6.8 % resistance [20], and included pharyngeal and non-pharyngeal sources as in our study. However, over 85 % of the isolates were defined as ‘throat’ and the study was unable to identify significant differences in the rate of macrolide resistance between pharyngeal and non-pharyngeal sources [20].
Our study does not provide direct evidence of enhanced virulence, but suggests an association between high-frequency resistance emm types and invasive disease. The effect on virulence of acquired antimicrobial resistance in bacteria is an area of profound interest in infectious diseases. Perhaps the best described associations between virulence and antimicrobial resistance are related to the acquisition of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec) that confers resistance to β-lactam antimicrobials in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) strains demonstrate high virulence in animal models and tend to carry SCCmec types IV or V [21]. In contrast, the presence of a larger SCCmec type in hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) strains results in reduced virulence in mice [22], but is likely dependent upon strain background [21]. Importantly, the presence of SCCmec is critical to determining appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Likewise, increased prevalence of MLS resistance phenotypes in GAS emm types associated with invasive disease may alter recommended adjunctive therapy with clindamycin for severe invasive disease (e.g. toxic shock syndrome).
Among the high-frequency resistant GAS emm types described in the Houston collection, we observed a disproportionate number in invasive disease compared to pharyngeal. Moreover, emm11 and emm92 GAS isolates demonstrate high-frequency resistance to multiple antimicrobials including macrolides, tetracyclines and aminoglycosides. We confirmed high-frequency resistance in emm11 and emm92 GAS strains by comparing to the geographically disparate strains captured by the CDC ABCs. Most striking was that emm92 GAS strains collectively showed >98 % resistance in Houston and the CDC ABCs. Phylogenetic analysis of 250 emm92 GAS strains showed a very high degree of relatedness and suggests a recent emergence, although emm92 GAS strains have been described as early as 1992 in New Zealand [23] and 1997 in the USA [24]. Inasmuch as tetracycline resistance has been postulated to contribute to the emergence of pathogenic strains of group B Streptococcus [25, 26], it is tempting to speculate that the presence of the antimicrobial-resistance-containing elements in emm11 and emm92 GAS strains may contribute to their disease potential.
The high invasive indices of resistant emm types raises the question of how these strains are transmitted within the human population. Examination of our original study [9] showed that all emm11 strains were derived from non-pharyngeal abscesses (e.g. lymph node), with the exception of two cases of pharyngeal space abscesses. Likewise, emm92 strains originated from abscess (lymph node) or cellulitis, with only two cases derived from pharyngeal space abscesses. Our findings are reminiscent of the Canadian emm59 epidemic that resulted in increased invasive disease, but was an unusual cause of pharyngitis [27]. It is possible that spread/transmission of emm11 and emm92 GAS strains occurs via direct skin-to-skin contact, as suggested for emm59. However, it is also possible that they are transmitted asymptomatically through pharyngeal spread. Moreover, as has been suggested for erm(A)-carrying emm94 GAS [28] (pattern E), it is possible that the high frequency of resistance observed is due to increased transmissibility compared to susceptible strains of the same emm type. Currently, our dataset does not include carriage surveillance and further research is needed to directly address such scenarios.
Fundamental differences in GAS strain biology apart from invasiveness may account for differences in resistance frequency between emm types. GAS serotypes can be grouped based on genetic markers associated with emm genes and tissue tropism and include pharyngeal (pattern A–C), skin (pattern D) and generalists or no specificity (pattern E) strains [29]. It is intriguing that all highly resistant emm types (11, 75, 77 and 92) in our study belong to pattern E. It is possible that gene content unique to pattern E GAS strains (e.g. serum opacity factor, SOF) contributes to the higher frequency of antimicrobial resistance including a more ready acquisition of mobile genetic elements compared to pattern A–C strains. Additional investigation is needed into the association of emm pattern and antimicrobial resistance and any relationship into the emergence of resistance and potential contributions to virulence.
Our study has several limitations. We used disc diffusion to screen for antimicrobial resistance and performed MIC determinations (via Etest) on a subset of strains and antimicrobials. Thus, it is possible that MIC determinations (via broth microdilution or Etest) on all strains with all antimicrobials may identify more subtle phenotypes and alter our findings. However, we observed near 100 % resistance genotype–phenotype concordance in sequenced strains, indicating a high degree of accuracy in our screening method. We observed relatively small numbers of emm11, emm75, emm77 and emm92 GAS strains over a limited timespan (4 years), increasing the chance of type II error. We partially mitigated the effect of low numbers by including analyses of publicly available and temporally matched GAS strain sequences from the CDC ABCs collection and the UK. Finally, we sequenced only a subset of GAS emm types and it is undoubtedly likely that additional genetic elements associated with GAS antimicrobial resistance are circulating within our strain population.
Overall, our study provides important insight into relationships between GAS emm type, disease type and antimicrobial resistance. Our findings that specific emm types display high-frequency resistance and may disproportionately contribute to invasive disease warrant continued surveillance and deeper investigative studies into antimicrobial resistance–strain virulence relationships in GAS.
Data bibliography
1. Chalker V, Jironkin A, Coelho J, Al-Shahib A, Platt S et al. Genome analysis following a national increase in Scarlet Fever in England 2014. BioProject number PRJEB13551.
2. Chochua S, Metcalf BJ, Li Z, Rivers J, Mathis S, et al. Population and Whole Genome Sequence Based Characterization of Invasive Group A Streptococci Recovered in the United States during 2015. BioProject accession# PRJNA395240.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under grant numbers R01-AI125216 and R21-AI142126.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Bernard Beall and Sopio Chochua at the CDC for information regarding the ABCs GAS strains used in this study.
Author contributions
M. A. S., O. R. M., B. S., B. H., L. A. V., Z. A. and A. R. F. designed and performed experiments. M. A. S., O. R. M. and A. R. F. analysed data. M. A. S. and A. R. F. wrote and edited the manuscript. O. R. M., B. S., L. A. V. and B. H. edited the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical statement
GAS isolates collected from the Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston, TX, USA, were collected under a protocol approved by Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston and the Institutional Review Board at Baylor College of Medicine.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ABCs, Active Bacterial Core Surveillance; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; GAS, group A Streptococcus; ICE, integrative conjugative element; MGE, mobile genetic element; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MLS, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin; MRSA, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; SCCmec, staphylococcal cassette chromosome; SSTI, skin and soft tissue infection; ST, sequence type.
The NCBI BioProject accession number for all short- and long-read sequencing data is PRJNA494557. Accession numbers for complete and annotated genomes are as follows: TSPY155 (CP032699), TSPY165 (CP033336), TSPY208 (CP033335), TSPY453 (CP033337) and TSPY556 (CP032700 and CP032701).
All supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. Seven supplementary tables and four supplementary figures are available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Nelson GE, Pondo T, Toews K-A, Farley MM, Lindegren ML, et al. Epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcal infections in the United States, 2005–2012. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:478–486. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shaikh N, Leonard E, Martin JM. Prevalence of streptococcal pharyngitis and streptococcal carriage in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e557–e564. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, Long SS, editors. Red Book. 29th edn. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gagliotti C, Nobilio L, Milandri M, Moro ML, for the Emilia-Romagna Antibiotic Resistance Study Group Macrolide prescriptions and erythromycin resistance of Streptococcus pyogenes . Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1153–1156. doi: 10.1086/501460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Papenburg J, Fontela PS, Freitas RR, Burstein B. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchiolitis in US emergency departments, 2007-2015. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019 doi: 10.1093/jpids/piy131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.CDC Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Roberts AP, Mullany P. Tn 916 -like genetic elements: a diverse group of modular mobile elements conferring antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35:856–871. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beres SB, Musser JM. Contribution of exogenous genetic elements to the group A Streptococcus metagenome. PLoS One. 2007;2:e800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Flores AR, McNeil JC, Shah B, Van Beneden C, Shelburne SA. Capsule-negative emm types are an increasing cause of pediatric group A streptococcal infections at a large pediatric hospital in Texas. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019;8:244–250. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piy053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. 13th edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Flores AR, Luna RA, Runge JK, Shelburne SA, Baker CJ. Cluster of fatal group A streptococcal emm87 infections in a single family: molecular basis for invasion and transmission. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:1648–1652. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chochua S, Metcalf BJ, Li Z, Rivers J, Mathis S, et al. Population and whole genome sequence based characterization of invasive group A streptococci recovered in the United States during 2015. MBio. 2017;8:e01422-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01422-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chalker V, Jironkin A, Coelho J, Al-Shahib A, Platt S, et al. Genome analysis following a national increase in scarlet fever in England 2014. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:224. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3603-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Palmieri C, Mingoia M, Massidda O, Giovanetti E, Varaldo PE. Streptococcus pneumoniae transposon Tn1545/Tn6003 changes to Tn6002 due to spontaneous excision in circular form of the erm(B)- and aphA3-containing macrolide-aminoglycoside-streptothricin (MAS) element. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:5994–5997. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01487-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Iannelli F, Santagati M, Santoro F, Oggioni MR, Stefani S, et al. Nucleotide sequence of conjugative prophage Φ1207.3 (formerly Tn1207.3) carrying the mef(A)/msr(D) genes for efflux resistance to macrolides in Streptococcus pyogenes . Front Microbiol. 2014;5:687. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Malhotra-Kumar S, Mazzariol A, Van Heirstraeten L, Lammens C, de Rijk P, et al. Unusual resistance patterns in macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes harbouring erm(A) . J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:42–46. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Woodbury RL, Klammer KA, Xiong Y, Bailiff T, Glennen A, et al. Plasmid-borne erm(T) from invasive, macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1140–1143. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01352-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Athey TBT, Teatero S, Sieswerda LE, Gubbay JB, Marchand-Austin A, et al. High incidence of invasive group A Streptococcus disease caused by strains of uncommon emm types in Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:83–92. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02201-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tanz RR, Shulman ST, Shortridge VD, Kabat W, Kabat K, et al. Community-based surveillance in the United States of macrolide-resistant pediatric pharyngeal group A streptococci during 3 respiratory disease seasons. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1794–1801. doi: 10.1086/426025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Beekmann SE, Miller NJ, Miller AL, et al. Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in the United States, 2002-2003. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:599–608. doi: 10.1086/432473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cameron DR, Howden BP, Peleg AY. The interface between antibiotic resistance and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus and its impact upon clinical outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:576–582. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaito C, Saito Y, Nagano G, Ikuo M, Omae Y, et al. Transcription and translation products of the cytolysin gene psm-mec on the mobile genetic element SCCmec regulate Staphylococcus aureus virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001267. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Relf WA, Martin DR, Sriprakash KS. Identification of sequence types among the M-nontypeable group A streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:3190–3194. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3190-3194.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Beall B, Facklam R, Hoenes T, Schwartz B. Survey of emm gene sequences and T-antigen types from systemic Streptococcus pyogenes infection isolates collected in San Francisco, California; Atlanta, Georgia; and Connecticut in 1994 and 1995. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:1231–1235. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.5.1231-1235.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Da Cunha V, Davies MR, Douarre P-E, Rosinski-Chupin I, Margarit I, et al. Streptococcus agalactiae clones infecting humans were selected and fixed through the extensive use of tetracycline. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4544. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Flores AR, Galloway-Peña J, Sahasrabhojane P, Saldaña M, Yao H, et al. Sequence type 1 group B Streptococcus, an emerging cause of invasive disease in adults, evolves by small genetic changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:6431–6436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504725112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fittipaldi N, Beres SB, Olsen RJ, Kapur V, Shea PR, et al. Full-genome dissection of an epidemic of severe invasive disease caused by a hypervirulent, recently emerged clone of group A Streptococcus . Am J Pathol. 2012;180:1522–1534. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Willems RJL, Hanage WP, Bessen DE, Feil EJ. Population biology of gram-positive pathogens: high-risk clones for dissemination of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35:872–900. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00284.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bessen DE, Sotir CM, Readdy TL, Hollingshead SK. Genetic correlates of throat and skin isolates of group A streptococci. J Infect Dis. 1996;173:896–900. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.4.896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.