Skip to main content
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases logoLink to Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases
. 2019 Sep 30;13(3):259–267.

Effect of D-Allethrin Aerosol and Coil to the Mortality of Mosquitoes

Sayono Sayono 1,*, Puji Lestari Mudawamah 1, Wulandari Meikawati 1, Didik Sumanto 1
PMCID: PMC6928380  PMID: 31879666

Abstract

Background:

Commercial insecticides were widely used by communities to control the mosquito population in their houses. D-allethrin is one of insecticide ingredients widely distributed in two different concentrations namely 0.15% of aerosol and 0.3% of coil formulations. We aimed to understand the mortality of indoor mosquitoes after being exposed to d-allethrin 0.15% (aerosol) and 0.3% (coil) formulations.

Methods:

This quasi-experiment study applied the posttest-only comparison group design. The aerosol and coil d-allethrin were used to expose the wild mosquitoes in twelve dormitory bedrooms of SMKN Jawa Tengah, a vocational high school belonging to Central Java Provincial Government, on March 2017. The compounds were exposed for 60 min to each bedroom with four-week interval for both of formulations. The knockdown mosquitoes were collected into a plastic cup and delivered to the laboratory for 24h holding, morphologically species identification and mortality recording. History of insecticide use in the dormitory was recorded by an interview with one student in each bedroom. Data were statistically analyzed with independent sample t-test and Mann-Whitney.

Results:

As many as 57 knockdown mosquitoes belonging to three species were obtained namely Culex fuscocephala, Cx. quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti with mortality rate of 50.88% after 24h holding. Knockdown and mortality of mosquitoes were significantly different based on d-allethrin formulations. D-allethrin concentrations were not effective for controlling Culex mosquitoes but effective for Ae. aegypti.

Conclusion:

Further efficacy of d-allethrin 0.15% aerosol to eradicate Ae. aegypti is necessary to be conducted in supporting the Dengue vector control.

Keywords: D-alletrin, Insecticide, Culex fuscocephala, Culex quinquefasciatus, Aedes aegypti

Introduction

Mosquitoes play an important role as vector of several kinds of diseases. The different species of mosquito could transmit different disease agents, although some species can transmit a number of pathogens (1, 2). Aedes mosquitoes have been known as vector of dengue, Chikungunya and Zika viruses (3) as well as Filarial parasites in certain condition (4). Culex mosquitoes can transmit Japanese encephalitis virus and filarial worms, while Anopheles transmits malaria and filarial worms. Armigeres spp. and Mansonia spp. also transmit filarial worms (1, 2).

Some mosquito species are found in residential environments with different abundance. Eight mosquito species were reported from six habitats in Thailand with the order of relative abundance were Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. vishnui, Cx. gelidus, Ae. aegypti, Mansonia spp., Anopheles spp., and Cx. bitaeniorhynchus, respectively (5). Nine mosquito species were found in urban settlement, in Nigeria namely Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. annulioris, Anopheles gambiae, An. funestus, An. rhodesiensis, An. arabiensis and Ae. aegypti. Three mosquito species showed the highest relative abundance i.e., Cx. quinquefasciatus (50.24%), Anopheles spp. (26.5%), and Ae. aegypti (0.2%) (6). In Mojokerto, East Java Province, Indonesia, five mosquito species were found in settlements namely Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus, Ae. laniger, Cx. bitaeniorhynchus and Cx. quinquefasciatus (7). Aedes aegypti is the dominant species in urban settlements (7) and the Dengue endemic areas (8), while Cx. quinquefasciatus is the dominant species in rural area (7).

Urban people in the Dengue endemic areas often used insecticide to repel and against mosquito exposure with several formulations such as repellent, aerosol, mosquito coil and electric mat. The most common of insecticide compounds are d-allethrin, prallethrin, transfluthrin, and diethyl toluamide (DEET) (9, 10). Commercial insecticides usually applied by community with ignored the written instruction (11). This unstandardized practice can cause a negative impact such as mortality of non-target organisms, environmental pollution, and the emergence of insect vectors resistance (12).

The resistance of mosquito vectors to pyrethroid insecticide class has been reported from several countries. Aedes aegypti is resistant to several pyrethroid compounds in Vietnam (13), Martinique (14), and Indonesia (15, 16). Anopheles barbirostris was resistant to some insecticide compounds namely lambda-cyhalothrin 0.05% and etofenprox 0.5% and tolerant to bendiocarb 0.1% (17). The resistance of Cx. quinquefasciatus to pyrethroid was reported from Japan and China that indicated by a genetic mutation (18). This species was reported resistant to permethrin, deltamethrin, and bendiocarb in Benin, Nigeria (19). Permethrin resistant of Cx. quinquefasciatus also reported from Central Java, Indonesia (20), and Mansonia is tolerant to pyrethroid insecticide (21). Cx. pipiens is reported resistant to four of insecticide classes namely pyrethroid, organochlorine, carbamate, and organophosphate in Iran (22).

Household insecticides circulating in Indonesia mostly contain pyrethroid compounds in either single or combination formulations, including d-allethrin. These insecticides are often used in the dense population settlement with uncontrolled doses. Susceptibility of mosquitoes to the compounds is necessary evaluated. We aimed to understand the susceptibility of mosquitoes to d-allethrin 0.15% aerosol and 0.3 % coil compounds in an urban settlement.

Materials and Methods

Study site

This quasi-experimental study was conducted in twelve of sixteen bedrooms at the dormitory of SMKN (Vocational High School) Jawa Tengah on March 2017. Each of the 4×6 square meter bedrooms contains six beds and represents the densely populated settlement. The two of d-allethrin formulations were applied at the twelve of bedrooms sequentially.

Application of d-allethrin aerosol and coil insecticide

The d-allethrin aerosol insecticide was applied in the morning when the bedrooms are empty. Clothes and snacks were moved out from bedrooms. All of ventilation, windows, door, and holes in the rooms were closed. Temperature and humidity of each room were measured by hygrometer and recorded. Each bedroom was divided into two sections and six quadrant direction for spraying of aerosol insecticide (Fig. 1). Six sprayings were done in each bedroom for five seconds according to the directions based on the previous study (23) with modifications. All of the bedrooms were closed for 60min after the aerosol insecticide was sprayed. The volume of sprayed liquid is equalized by measuring the weight of the insecticide bottle before and after it is sprayed.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Direction of insecticide spraying. The bedroom was divided into six spraying directions that indicated by the rows

The d-allethrin mosquito coil formulation was obtained from the market and applied four weeks following application of the aerosol formulation based on the previous study with modifications (24). A mosquito coil was burned on the tip and placed for 60min in the center of each bedroom. Application of those different insecticide formulations was done in the equal condition of bedrooms.

Laboratory works

The knockdown mosquitoes from each bedroom were collected in the plastic cups and labeled by name of the bedroom and delivered to Epidemiology Laboratory, Faculty of Public Health of Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang for twenty-four-hour holding. Each cup was placed in different mosquito cage. Temperature and humidity of the recovery room were maintained at the 27±2 Celsius degree and 80±10%. The ten percent of sugar solution was placed in each mosquito cage for feeding the live mosquitoes. Mortality of mosquito was calculated based on species. Mosquito identification used the arthropod identification key of Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit (25).

Data analysis

The relative abundance, exposure frequency and dominance rate of mosquitoes were calculated based on the formulas below (26):

Relativeabundance=numberofmosquitoofaspeciesTotalmosquitospecies×100%
Exposurefrequency=numberofmosquitoofaspeciesTotalofmosquitocatching
Dominancerate=relativeabundance×frequency

The different of knockdown and mortality of mosquitoes were analyzed based on d-allethrin formulation. History of insecticide use in the dormitory was showed in a frequency table.

Ethical approval

Protocol of this study was approved by Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine of Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Informed consent and research permission were obtained from dormitory management.

Results

Knockdown and mortality of mosquitoes

As many as 57 knockdown mosquitoes were obtained from this study, and mortality of mosquito was 50.88%. Majority of the knockdown (94.44%), dead (96.43%) and alive (92.31%) mosquito were obtained from the d-allethrin aerosol exposed-group, and contrast conditions were found in the mosquito coil exposed-group. A number of the knockdown, dead and alive mosquitoes were significantly different based on the d-allethrin formulations (Table 1).

Table 1.

Knockdown, dead and alive mosquitoes based on the insecticide (d-allethrin-0.15% compound) formulations

Insecticide formulation Mosquito conditions

Knockdown Dead Alive
Aerosol
Number 57 29 28
Minimum 1 1 0
Maximum 13 7 6
Mean 4.50 2.33 2.17
Standard deviation 3.26 1.92 1.75
Mosquito coil
Number 3 1 2
Minimum 0 0 0
Maximum 2 1 2
Mean 0.25 0.08 0.17
Standard deviation 0.62 0.29 0.58
P-value 0.01 0.02 0.01

The higher number of mosquitoes was obtained from the aerosol formulation rather than mosquito coil indicating the faster effect of this formulation

Morphological identification

Results of morphological identification of mosquito were found three species. Two species belong to Culex genus and one species belongs to Aedes genus, namely Cx. fuscocephala, Cx. quinquefasciatus and Ae. aegypti. Mention order of the three mosquito species also represents the order of relative abundance, exposure frequency and dominance rate (Tables 2, 3).

Table 2.

Abundance, frequency, and dominance rate of mosquito species

Spices Number of mosquitoes Relative abundance (%) Frequency Dominance rate
Culex fuscochepala 41 71.93 0.45 32.96
Culex quinqueasciatus 15 26.31 0.29 7.67
Aedes aegypti 1 1.75 0.4 0.07

Three mosquitoes species were found in the dormitory with the high abundance of the Culex genera

Table 3.

Knockdown, dead, alive and mortality of mosquitoes based on the species and d-allethrin formulations

Species Insecticide formulation Knockdown Dead alive Mortality (%)
Culex fuscochepala Aerosol 41 20 21 48.78
Mosquito coil 0 0 0 0.00
Culex quinquefasciatus Aerosol 12 7 5 58.33
Mosquito coil 3 1 2 33.33
Aedes aegypti Aerosol 1 1 0 100.00
Mosquito coil 0 0 0 0.00
Total 57 29 28 50.88

Mortality of mosquitoes after exposed with d-allethrin 0.15% and 0.30% insecticide compounds were very low. This condition indicated that Culex mosquitoes were resistant to these concentrations

History of Commercial Insecticide Use

Results of interview with respondent of each bedroom showed that majority of dormitory inhabitants used insecticide to expel the mosquitoes almost every day, mainly the repellent. The d-allethrin compound was also used among inhabitants (Table 4). Fogging or residual spraying was not used in this dormitory.

Table 4.

Information about insecticide use among students at the boarding school

Variables f %
Commercial insecticide use
1. Yes 10 83,3
2. No 2 16,7
Insecticide formulation
1. Aerosol 1 10,0
2. Electric mat 3 30,0
3. Repellent (lotion) 6 60,0
Insecticide compounds
1. Diethyltoluamid 12.5% 4 40,0
2. Diethyltoluamid 13% 1 10,0
3. Diethyltoluamid 15% 1 10,0
4. D-aletrin 0.15% and Praletrin 0.2% 2 20,0
5. Praletrin 13.16g/l 2 20,0
Frequency of insecticide use in a week
1. 1–3 times 4 40,0
2. 4–5 times 2 20,0
3. 6–7 times 4 40,0

Majority of inhabitants at the dormitory use insecticide, mainly in repellent formulation with DEET compound, although the daily use is under 50% of students. Forty percent of inhabitants used pyrethroid compounds

Discussion

This result showed that d-allethrin aerosol formulation can eradicate and kill more mosquitoes rather than the coil formulation, although this compound indicated effective result for Aedes mosquitoes only. This finding required further investigation to obtain sufficient evidence of Ae. aegypti susceptibility to d-allethrin. Using the aerosol formulation allowed that the droplets of insecticide will effectively contact with the mosquito’s body, and inhale via respiratory system of mosquitoes (27).

The mortality rate of mosquitoes in this study indicated the low efficacy of d-allethrin 0.15% to the mosquito population in the dormitory rooms. This result matched with the facts that majority of dormitory residents use commercial insecticide for preventing mosquito attack with high frequency, mainly repellant, electric mat, and aerosol formulation. Those insecticide formulations also contain the d-allethrin 0.15% compound (Table 4). High frequency of household insecticide use will correlate with insecticide resistance among Culex mosquitoes (28). Resistance of mosquitoes to d-allethrin compounds is similar to the previous report from Malaysia and Indonesia that the mosquito coil containing d-allethrin 0.2% compound resulted in the low mortality rate (24, 29, 30), but different from the reports of aerosol insecticide application containing d-allethrin and d-trans allethrin from Thailand that showed mortality rate of mosquitoes were 96% (31) and 90% (32), respectively. Although distinctly different with the findings in Thailand, results of this study correspond to similar finding in Central Java Province that Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes in endemic areas of Lymphatic filariasis have been resistant to the pyrethroid compound, in particular, permethrin 0.75% (20). In Iran Cx. pipiens Linn. was resistant to some pyrethroid compounds and other insecticide classes (22). Permethrin and d-allethrin derived from the same class of insecticide, pyrethroid. This insecticide class has target site the voltage-gated sodium channel gene (33). The different types of pyrethroid compounds will have a similar effect to disrupt the voltage-gated sodium channel gene (34) and cause the genetic mutation of codon 1014 of the gene that indicated by substitution of amino acid leucine to phenylalanine or serine (35).

Although the dormitory is located in the Dengue endemic of urban residential, there is only a few the Aedes mosquito found. This phenomenon is caused that the dormitory is surrounded by a two-meter high wall fence, and there was no puddle of clean water as a place for microhabitat of this species. This wall can prevent the entrance of mosquito into the dormitory areas. The female Ae. aegypti use the opened clean water of the domestic containers in laying their eggs rather than natural water containers such as leaf midrib, tree hole or bamboo stems (36).

Culex is the dominant mosquito genus in this settlement. This result is in accordance with the findings in Thailand (5) and Nigeria (6), but different from the findings in Mojokerto, Indonesia where the results of larval surveys in various breeding places in the urban settlement obtained the dominant mosquitoes are Ae. aegypti (7). Aedes aegypti was the dominant mosquito species in the Dengue endemic areas (8). In this case, the dormitory is located in an urban environment with dense building and surrounded the sewers with stagnant water. This condition provides a good habitat for breeding site of Culex mosquitoes. Theoretically, the favorite habitat of this species is stagnant of water surface such as hoof-prints, rain pools, irrigation channels, discarded tubes, ditch, sewer, and ponds (37, 38).

Other studies on the abundance of mosquitoes in the educational environment were reported from Thailand (39), Sabah, Malaysia (40), Makassar, Indonesia (41) that the dominant mosquito is the genus Culex, similar to the dormitory of this study although Cx. quniquefasciatus is not dominant species (42, 43). The further investigation is needed to analyze the wild mosquito susceptibility to d-allethrin compound by using the laboratory strain of mosquito as the control group, and the causation between environmental profiles, kinds of breeding site and insecticide use to the abundance and dominance of mosquito species, and the occurrence of diseases.

Conclusion

There were three mosquito species found in the bedrooms of SMKN Jawa Tengah belonging to two genera namely Culex and Aedes. Exposure of d-allethrin 0.15% in space spray formulation caused higher knockdown and dead mosquito rather than d-allethrin 0.3% in mosquito coil formulation. Overall, the mortality rate of mosquito reached 50.88% which indicated a resistant status to this insecticide compound, except Ae. aegypti. Further investigation is needed to determine Ae. aegypti abundance at the dormitory and resistant status of Culex mosquito to another insecticide compounds.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank for SMKN Jawa Tengah (Vocational High School of Central Java Government) given the research permission.

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Sarwar M. (2015) Insect-Borne Disease Transmitted by Some Important Vectors of Class Insecta Hurtling Public Health. Int J Bioinform Biomed Enggin. 1(3): 311–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Singh N, Shukla S, Gupta V, Tandia N, Singh P. (2015) Mosquito borne zoonotics disease. Livest Sci. 6: 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leta S, Beyene TJ, Clercq EMD, Amenu K, Kraemer MUG, Revie CW. (2018) Global risk mapping for major diseases transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Int J Infect Dis. 67: 25–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gleave K, Cook D, Taylor MJ, Reimer LJ. (2016) Filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity. Sci Rep. 6: 36319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thongsripong P, Green A, Kittayapong P, Kapan D, Wilcox B, Bennet S. (2013) Mosquito Vector Diversity Across Habitats in Central Thailand Endemics for Dengue and Other Arthropod-Borne Disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 7(10): e2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Micheal C. (2014) Abundance of Indoor Resting Mosquito Populations And Plasmodium FalciparumInfection of Anopheles Spp In Settlements Around The Zaria Dam, Zaria, Kaduna State. Nigeria: Department of Biological Science Faculty of Science, Ahmadu Bello University; Available at: https://bit.ly/2Ylwmce. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Islamiyah M, Leksono SA, Gama PZ. (2013) Mosquitoes distribution and composition in Mojokerto region (in Indonesian: Distribusi dan Komposisi Nyamuk di Wilayah Mojokerto). Jurnal Biotropika. 1(2): 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sayono S, Nurullita U, Sumanto D, Handoyo W. (2017) Altitudinal Distribution of Aedes Indices during dry season in the Dengue endemic area of Central Java, Indonesia. Ann Parasitol. 63(3): 213–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hendri J, Kusnandar AJ, Astuti EP. (2016) Identification of the bioactive compound and the use of antimosquito insecticide as well as the Dengue vector resistance to organophosphate in the three Dengue endemic cities in Banten Province (in Indonesian: Identifikasi Jenis Bahan Aktif dan Penggunaan Insektisida Antinyamuk serta Kerentanan Vektor DBD terhadap Organofosfat pada Tiga Kota Endemis DBD di Provinsi Banten). Aspirator. 8(2): 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Prasetyowati H, Astuti EP, Ruliansyah A. (2016) Household insecticide use in controlling Aedes aegypti population in the Dengue endemic areas, East Jakarta (in Indoensian: Penggunaan Insektisida Rumah Tangga dalam Pengendalian Populasi Aedes aegypti di Daerah Endemis Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD) di Jakarta Timur). Aspirator. 8(1): 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Titiek Siti Yuliani TS, Triwidodo H, Mudikdjo K, Panjaitan NK, Manuwoto S. (2011) Pesticide use behavior: case study of residential pest control in urban settlement Jakarta (in Indonesian: Penggunaan Pestisida: Studi Kasus Pengendalian Hama Permukiman di Permukiman Perkotaan DKI Jakarta). Forum Pascasarjana. 34(23): 195–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sanchez-Bayo F, Tennekes HA, Goka K. Impact of Systemic Insecticides on Organisms and Ecosystems. In: Insecticides-Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies. Intech Open. https://www.intechopen.com/books/insecticides-development-of-safer-and-more-effective-technologies/impact-of-systemic-insecticides-on-organisms-and-ecosystems
  • 13.Doung TT, Dung NV, Chinh VD, Trung HD. (2016) Mapping Insecticide Resistance in Dengue Vectors in the Northern Vietnam 2010–2013. Vector Biol J. 1(1): 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marcombe S, Poupardin R, Mathieu RB, Pocquet N, Riaz MA, David JP, Se'lior S, Darriet F, Reynaud S, Ye'bakima A, Corbel V, Chandre F. (2012) Insecticide Resistance in the Dengue Vector Aedes aegypti from Martinique: Distribution, Mechanisms and Relations with Environmental Factors. PLoS One. 7(2): e30989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ikawati B, Sunaryo, Widiastuti D. (2015) Map of Aedes aegypti (Linn.) susceptibility status to Cypermethrin and Malathion insecticide in Central Java. (in Indonesian: Peta Status Kerentanan Aedes aegypti (Linn.) Terhadap Insektisida Cypermethrin Dan Malathion Di Jawa Tengah). Aspirator. 7(1): 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sayono S, Hidayati APN, Fahri S, Sumanto D, Dharmana E, Hadisaputro S, Asih PBS, Syafruddin D. (2016) Distribution of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel (Nav) Alleles among the Aedes aegypti Populations In Central Java Province and Its Association with Resistance to Pyrethroid Insecticides. PLoS One. 11(3): e0150577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mustafa H, Jastal J, Gunawan G, Risti R. (2016) Susceptibility status determination of Anopheles barbirostris mosquitoes to Bendiocarb, Etofenprox, dan Lambda-cyhalothrin insecticides in Tojo Una-una districts, Central Sulawesi. (in Indonesian: Penentuan Status Kerentanan Nyamuk Anopheles barbirostris terhadap Insektisida Bendiocarb, Etofenprox, dan Lamb-dacyhalothrin di Kabupaten Tojo Una-una, Sulawesi Tengah). Media Libtangkes. 26 (2): 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scott JG, Yoshimizu MH, Kasai S. (2014) Pyrethroid resistance in Culex pipiens mosquitoes. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 120: 68–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yadouléton A, Badirou K, Agbanrin R, Jöst H, Attolou R, Srinivasan R, Padonou G, Akogbeto M. (2015) Insecticide Resistance Status in Culex quinquefasciatus in Benin. Parasit Vectors. 8: 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chakim I, Sayono S, Astuti R. (2017) High Levels of Resistance in A Culex quinquefasciatus Population to the Insecticide Permethrin in Filariasis Endemic Areas in Central Java. Makara J Sci. 21(4): 149–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Agossa FR, Gnanguenon V, Anagonou R, Azondekon R, Aizoun N, Sovi A, Oke-Agbo F, Sezonlin M, Akogbeto MC. (2015) Impact of Insecticide Resistance on the Effectiveness of Pyrethroid-Based Malaria Vectors Control Tools in Benin: Decreased Toxicity and Repellent Effect. PLoS One. 10(12): e0145207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ghorbani F, Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Abai MR, Nikoobar H, Enayati AA. (2018) High Resistance of Vector of West Nile Virus, Culex pipiens Linnaeus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Different Insecticides Recommended by WHO in Northern Iran. J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 12(1): 24–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Khadri MS, Kwok KL, Noor MI, Lee HL. (2009) Efficacy of commercial household insecticide aerosol sprays against Aedes aegypti (Linn.) under simulated field conditions. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 40(6): 1226–1234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chin AC, Chen CD, Low VL, Lee HL, Azidah AA, Lau KW, Sofian-Azirun M. (2017) Comparative efficacy of commercial mosquito coils against Aedes aegypti (diptera: Culicidae) in Malaysia: a nationwide report. J Econ Entomol. 110(5): 2247–2251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit Arthropod Identification Keys. Available at: http://www.wrbu.org/aors/northcom_Keys.html
  • 26.Astuti EP, Ipa M, Wahono T, Riandi U. (2012) Density of filariasis vector-suspected mosquitoes in Panumbangan village-Ciamis District, Jalaksana village-Kuningan District, and Batukuwung village-Serang District. (In Indonesian: Kepadatan Nyamuk Tersangka Vektor Filariasis di Desa Panumbangan, Kabupaten Ciamis, Desa Jalaksana Kabupaten Kuningan dan Batukuwung Kabupaten Serang). Jurnal Ekologi Kesehatan. 11(4): 342–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pemba D, Kadangwe C. (2012) Mosquito Control Aerosols' Efficacy Based on Pyrethroids Constituents. In: Insecticides-Advances in Integrated Pest Management. Edited by Dr Farzana Perveen. ISBN: 978-953-307-780-2, InTech, Available at: https://bit.ly/340MJMR.
  • 28.Kudom AA, Mensah BA, Nunoo J. (2013) Assessment of anti-mosquito measures in households and resistance status of Culex species in urban areas in southern Ghana: Implications for the sustainability of ITN use. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 6(11): 859–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen CD, Chin AC, Lau KW, Low VL, Lee HL, Lee PKY, Azidah AA, Sofian-Azirun M. (2018) Bioefficacy Evaluation of Commercial Mosquito Coils Containing Metofluthrin, d-Allethrin, d-Trans Allethrin, and Prallethrin Against Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Malaysia. J Med Entomol. 55(6): 1651–1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Amelia-Yap ZH, Chen CD, Sofian-Azirun M, Lau KW, Suana IW, Harmonis, Syahputra E, Razak A, Low VL. (2018) Efficacy of Mosquito Coils: Cross-resistance to Pyrethroids in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) From Indonesia. J Econ Entomol. 111(6): 2854–2860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.El-garja FMA, Avicora SW, Wajidia MFF, Jaalb Z. (2015) Comparative efficacy of Spatial Repellents Containing D-allethrin and D-trans Allethrin Against The Major Dengue Vector Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus). Asian Biomed. 9(3): 313–320. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mulla MS, Thavara U, Tawatsin A, Kong-Ngamsuk W, Chompoosri J. (2001) Mosquito Burden and Impact on the Poor: Measures and Costs for Personal Protection in some Communities in Thailand. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 17(3): 153–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Davies TGE, Field LM, Usherwood PNR, Williamson MS. (2007) DDT, Pyrethrins, Pyrethroids and Insect Sodium Channel. IUBMB Life. 59(3): 151–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Soderlaund DM. (2012) Molecular Mechanisms of Pyrethroid Insecticide Neurotoxicity: Recent Advances. Arch Toxicol. 86(2): 165–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen L, Zhong D, Zhang D, Shi L, Zhou G, Gong M, Zhou H, Sun Y, Ma L, He J, Hong S, Zhou D, Xiong C, Chen C, Zou P, Zhu C, Yan G. (2010) Molecular Ecology of Pyrethroid Knockdown Resistance in Culex pipiens pallens Mosquitoes. PLoS One. 5(7): e11681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Day JF. (2016) Mosquito Oviposition Behavior and Vector Control. Insects. 7(4): E65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Azari-Hamidian S. (2007) Larval Habitat Characteristics of Mosquitoes of the Genus Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Guilan Province, Iran. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 1(1): 9–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Farjana T, Ahmmed MS, Khanom TF, Alam N, Begum N. (2015) Surveillance of Mosquitoes Larva at Selected Areas of Mymensingh District in Bangladesh. Bangl J Vet Med. 13(1): 79–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Alam N, Farjana T, Khanom TF, Labony SS, Islam KR, Ahmmed S, Modal MMH. (2015) Prevalence of mosquitoes (diptera: culicidae) in and around Bangladesh Agricultural University campus of Mymensingh in Bangladesh. Progressive Agriculture. 26: 60–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hassan N, Dawood MM. (2016) Diversity and Abundance of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Universiti Malaysia Sabah Campus, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Serangga. 21(2): 79–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Karmila M, Syahribulan S, Wahid I. (2016) Diversity of mosquito species around the campus of Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar. (In Indonesian: Keanekaragaman Jenis Nyamuk Di Sekitar Kampus Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar). Available at: https://bit.ly/2Ylwmce
  • 42.Chen CD, Lee HL, Stella-Wong SP, Lau KW, Sofian-Azirun M. (2009) Container survey of mosquito breeding sites in a university campus in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Dengue Bull. 33: 187–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Naz R, Maryam A, Shabnam S. (2014) Population Dynamics of Mosquitoes in Various Breeding Habitats at University of Peshawar Campus, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa Pakistan. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2(2): 189–195. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES