Skip to main content
Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research logoLink to Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
. 2019 Dec 18;25:9712–9720. doi: 10.12659/MSM.917356

Effect of Periodontitis and Toothbrushing Frequency on Obesity Onset: A Cohort Study

Toyoko Morita 1,2,A,C,D,E,F,G, Yoji Yamazaki 1,A,C,D,E,F,G, Misae Seto 3,B, Takashi Yamamoto 1,A,G, Kumiko Nakai 2,4,D,F,G, Hideki Tanaka 2,4,D,F,G, Manami Ozaki 2,4,F,G, Ryosuke Koshi 2,D,F, Masao Maeno 5,A,D,E, Takayuki Kawato 2,4,A,D,E,F,G,
PMCID: PMC6930697  PMID: 31852008

Abstract

Background

The interplay between obesity and periodontitis has been widely examined. While obesity was reported as a risk factor for periodontitis, the inverse relationship is still little explored. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether periodontitis and toothbrushing frequency affect the onset of obesity.

Material/Methods

This cohort study included 1619 employees of a business enterprise headquartered in Tokyo, who in 2002 and 2006 underwent in prescribed annual health checks, both general and dental-specific, and who were not obese in 2002 (body mass index <25). The response variable was obesity (or absence) at 4 years, while the explanatory variables were presence/absence of periodontal pockets and toothbrushing frequency in 2002; their relationships were examined by multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

Subjects with periodontal pockets ≥4 mm showed a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) for onset of obesity at 4 years than those without periodontal pockets [OR: 1.59, 95% CI (confidence interval): 1.08–2.35, p<0.05]. Similarly, subjects who brushed their teeth ≥3 times/day had a significantly lower obesity OR than those who brushed ≤1 time/day (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28–0.85, p<0.01).

Conclusions

The presence of periodontal pockets and toothbrushing frequency are significantly associated with the onset of obesity. Periodontal pockets ≥4 mm are associated with increased risk of obesity, while frequent toothbrushing (≥3 times/day) appears to reduce the risk of obesity.

MeSH Keywords: Chronic Periodontitis; Cohort Studies; Obesity, Abdominal; Toothbrushing

Background

Obesity is a worldwide health problem and is not specific to developed nations [1]. In 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated the worldwide population of obese adults at roughly 600 million and forecast a further increase due to increased intake of high-calorie foods and sedentary lifestyles [2]. Obesity is a major risk factor for many diseases that markedly reduce the quality of life, such as type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, arteriosclerosis, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and sleep-disordered breathing [1]. These diseases are highly prevalent in middle-aged adults, who comprise the majority of the working population [3,4]. Therefore, prevention of obesity is also important from a socioeconomic perspective.

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that is known to negatively affect the systemic health status. The relationship between obesity and periodontal disease has been examined in several cross-sectional studies [58] and was reported in their systematic reviews and meta-analyses [911]. In addition, several cohort studies have shown that obesity actually affects the onset of periodontal disease [1215]. However, few epidemiological studies have determined the effects of periodontal disease on the development of obesity; the only such study on this topic followed children from childhood to adolescence [12]. However, as both periodontal disease and obesity become more prevalent with age [3,6], there is also a clear need to evaluate this impact in adults.

Toothbrushing is the most basic method to prevent periodontal disease [16]. A systematic review and meta-analyses reported that good oral hygiene as measured by the amount of plaque accumulation and good oral healthcare habits as evident by toothbrushing frequency or visits to a dental hygienist/dentist decreased the risk of periodontitis [17]. Toothbrushing practices have recently been reported to affect the onset of diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia [18], as well as metabolic syndrome [19]. Despite the fact that obesity is the main cause of metabolic syndrome [20], very few studies have examined the possible relationship between toothbrushing practices and obesity. Apart from a cross-sectional study using the results of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [21], assessing the relationship between toothbrushing frequency and obesity, there have been few longitudinal studies.

We have previously reported that periodontitis increases the risk of developing metabolic syndrome in a longitudinal cohort study from which we excluded not only obese individuals, but also individuals with hypertension, hyperglycemia, or dyslipidemia [22]. Therefore, in the present study, we examined whether periodontitis and toothbrushing frequency affect the development of obesity in non-obese individuals, including those with hypertension, hyperglycemia, or dyslipidemia.

Material and Methods

Study population

The present study was conducted with the approval of the Nihon University School of Dentistry Institutional Review Board (approval number: 2007-7). After the study aim and protocol were fully explained, the participants provided informed consent.

Initially, the study population comprised 2373 employees of a business headquartered in Tokyo who, in 2002, underwent prescribed annual health checks, both general and dental-specific, conducted voluntarily by a health insurance association. Although 99.9% of employees underwent the general health check, only 82.8% underwent the dental health check; thus, only those were considered. The analysis set was then narrowed down to those employees who also underwent both health checks in 2006 (2078 employees), and who were not obese in 2002 [final set of 1619 employees: 1286 men and 333 women; mean age of 39.7 years (age range, 20–56 years)]. In this study, obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥25 [20]. Figure 1 shows the flow chart for the selection of the study population.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart for selection of the study population. BMI, body mass index: BMI ≥25, obese; BMI <25, not obese.

Periodontitis examination

Periodontitis was evaluated and classified according to the World Health Organization’s Community Periodontal Index (CPI) [23]. With the oversight of a dentist, a dental hygienist examined 10 index teeth in the 6 sextants; the highest CPI code attributed to that sample was recorded as the subject’s CPI. Based on the results obtained in the initial examination in 2002, the subjects were divided into 2 subgroups: CPI 0–2 (absence of periodontal pockets) and CPI 3–4 (presence of periodontal pockets ≥4 mm).

General examination

BMI was calculated from each individual’s height and body weight. Blood pressure was measured in a seated position with an automated sphygmomanometer. Blood was collected from a vein in the arm, with the subjects having fasted from 9 p.m. the previous night, and the levels of triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose were determined. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mmHg. Dyslipidemia was defined as a triglyceride level ≥150 mg/dL and/or an HDL cholesterol level <40 mg/dL. A fasting blood glucose ≥110 mg/dL was defined as hyperglycemia.

Self-administered questionnaire

Toothbrushing and other aspects of lifestyle were examined with a self-administered questionnaire during annual general health checks. Toothbrushing practices were examined in terms of daily frequency (i.e., how many times the subjects brushed their teeth daily). Accordingly, the subjects were divided into subgroups of once or less daily (≤1 time/day), twice daily (2 times/day), or 3 or more times daily (≥3 times/day). Smoking habits and ability to maintain a healthy body weight were examined with the following respective questions, “Do you smoke?” and “Are you making an effort to maintain a healthy body weight?”; the subjects were then divided based on their “yes” or “no” answers.

Statistical analysis

Subjects’ baseline characteristics were compared using Pearson’s χ2 test based on presence/absence of periodontal pockets and daily toothbrushing frequency. The relationships of obesity at 4 years with presence/absence of periodontal pockets and daily toothbrushing frequency at baseline and/or 4 years were analyzed using forced entry multiple logistic regression (adjusted for hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, smoking habits, ability to maintain a healthy body weight, age, and sex) to determine the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical analyses were performed using JMP (ver. 13.0; SAS Institute, Tokyo, Japan) with the level of statistical significance set at <5% (p<0.05).

Results

Subjects’ baseline characteristics

At baseline, in 2002, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia were present in 25.3% (n=410), 16.0% (n=260), and 4.6% (n=75), respectively, of the 1619 non-obese subjects included in this study; all of the above conditions were significantly more prevalent among subjects with periodontal pockets than among those without them. A total of 36.1% (n=584) of subjects responded that they smoke and 28.5% (n=461) responded that they do not make efforts to maintain a healthy body weight. Smoking was significantly more common among subjects with periodontal pockets than among subjects without, but the presence of periodontal pockets was not significantly different between subjects who maintained a healthy body weight and those who did not (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of study population in relation to the presence of periodontal pockets at baseline.

Variables Without pockets (n=1,190) With pockets (n=429) P value
N % N %
Hypertension
 No 932 78.3 277 64.6 <0.001
 Yes 258 21.7 152 35.4
Dyslipidemia
 No 1,027 86.3 332 77.4 <0.001
 Yes 163 13.7 97 22.6
Hyperglycemia
 No 1,152 96.8 392 91.4 <0.001
 Yes 38 3.2 37 8.6
Smoking habit
 No 809 68.0 226 52.7 <0.001
 Yes 381 32.0 203 47.3
Making an effort to maintain a healthy body weight
 No 344 28.9 117 27.3 0.520
 Yes 846 71.1 312 72.7
Age
 <40year 745 62.6 135 31.5 <0.001
 ≥40year 445 37.4 294 68.5
Gender
 Male 898 75.5 388 90.4 <0.001
 Female 292 24.5 41 9.6
Toothbrushing frequency
 ≤1 time/day 88 7.4 59 13.8
 2 times/day 435 36.6 200 46.6 <0.001
 ≥3 times/day 667 56.1 170 39.6

Daily toothbrushing frequency was once or less for 9.1% of subjects (n=147), twice for 39.2% (n=635), and 3 or more times for 51.7% (n=837). These percentages of toothbrushing frequencies significantly differed according to the presence or absence of periodontal pockets (Table 1).

Compared to subjects without periodontal pockets, the group of subjects with periodontal pockets included significantly higher percentages of men and people aged ≥40 years (Table 1). In comparisons involving daily toothbrushing frequency, significant differences were observed for all items studied (Table 2).

Table 2.

Characteristics of study population in relation to the frequencies of toothbrushing at baseline.

Variables The frequencies of toothbrushing P value
≤1 time/day (n=147) 2 times/day (n=635) ≥3 times/day (n=837)
N % N % N %
Hypertension
 No 95 64.6 462 72.8 652 77.9 0.001
 Yes 52 35.4 173 27.2 185 22.1
Dyslipidemia
 No 107 72.8 511 80.5 741 88.5 <0.001
 Yes 40 27.2 124 19.5 96 11.5
Hyperglycemia
 No 129 87.8 597 94 818 97.7 <0.001
 Yes 18 12.2 38 6 19 2.3
Smoking habit
 No 68 46.3 353 55.6 614 73.4 <0.001
 Yes 79 53.7 282 44.1 223 26.6
Making an effort to maintain a healthy body weight
 No 57 38.8 187 29.5 217 25.9 0.005
 Yes 90 61.2 448 70.6 620 74.1
Age
 <40year 50 34.0 341 54.7 489 58.4 <0.001
 ≥40year 97 66.0 294 46.3 348 41.6
Gender
 Male 144 98.0 574 90.4 568 67.9 <0.001
 Female 3 2.0 61 9.6 269 16.6

Effects of periodontal pockets presence and toothbrushing frequency at baseline on obesity onset

At baseline, in 2002, none of the 1619 subjects were obese; 4 years later in 2006, 140 subjects (corresponding to 8.6%) had developed obesity (BMI ≥25). None of the subjects had a BMI ≥30 in 2006. The group of subjects with periodontal pockets (CPI 3–4) showed a significantly higher OR for onset of obesity at 4 years than the group of subjects without periodontal pockets (CPI 0–2) (1.59, 95% CI: 1.08–2.35, p<0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Relationship between obesity in 2006 and periodontal pockets and toothbrushing frequency in 2002.

Condition in 2002 Number of subjects in 2006 (n, %) Adjusted OR (95%CI)
Non-obesity (n=1,479, 91.4%) Obesity (n=140, 8.6%)
Periodontal pockets
 Without pocket 1,103 (92.7) 87 (7.3) 1
 With pocket 376 (87.6) 53 (12.4) 1.59 (1.08–2.35)*
Toothbrushing frequency
 ≤1 time/day 123 (83.7) 24 (16.3) 1
 2 times/day 574 (90.4) 61 (9.6) 0.62 (0.37–1.06)
 ≥3 times/day 782 (93.4) 55 (6.6) 0.49 (0.28–0.85)**
Hypertension
 No 1,114 (92.1) 95 (7.9) 1
 Yes 365 (89.0) 45 (11.0) 1.18 (0.79–1.77)
Dyslipidemia
 No 1,250 (92.0) 109 (8.0) 1
 Yes 229 (88.1) 31 (11.9) 1.22 (0.78–1.91)
Hyperglycemia
 No 1,411 (91.4) 133 (8.6) 1
 Yes 68 (90.7) 7 (9.3) 0.75 (0.32–1.73)
Smoking habit
 No 947 (91.5) 88 (8.5) 1
 Yes 532 (91.1) 52 (8.9) 0.76 (0.52–1.12)
Making an effort to maintain a healthy body weight
 No 396 (85.9) 65 (14.1) 1
 Yes 1,083 (93.5) 75 (6.5) 0.44 (0.30–0.62)**
Age
 <40year 812 (92.3) 68 (7.7) 1
 ≥40year 667 (90.3) 72 (9.7) 1.01 (0.68–1.48)
Gender
 Male 1,159 (90.1) 127 (9.9) 1
 Female 320 (96.1) 13 (3.9) 0.48 (0.26–0.89)*
*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01.

Confounders: hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, smoking habit, making an effort to maintain a healthy body weight, age, and gender. OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval.

For the group of subjects who brushed their teeth ≥3 times/day or who brushed 2 times/day, the ORs for onset of obesity at 4 years were 0.49 (95% CI: 0.28–0.85, p<0.01) or 0.62 (95% CI: 0.37–1.06, p=0.08), respectively, in relation to the group of subjects who brushed ≤1 time/day. Thus, the OR was significantly lower for subjects with toothbrushing frequency ≥3 times/day (Table 3).

Participants who made an effort to maintain a healthy body weight showed significantly lower OR (0.44, 95% CI: 0.30–0.62, p<0.01) for onset of obesity at 4 years than the group who did not. The ORs for onset of obesity were significantly lower in females than in males (0.48, 95% CI: 0.26–0.89, p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the OR for onset of obesity relative to hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, smoking, and age at baseline (Table 3).

Changes in the presence of periodontal pockets at baseline and at 4 years and its effects on obesity onset

Among the 1190 subjects without periodontal pockets at baseline, 1006 subjects (84.5%) remained without periodontal pockets at 4 years and 184 (15.5%) developed periodontal pockets. Among the 429 subjects with periodontal pockets at baseline, 216 (50.3%) still had periodontal pockets, and 213 (49.7%) were without periodontal pockets. The group with periodontal pockets at both baseline and 4 years had a significantly higher OR for the onset of obesity at 4 years than the group without periodontal pockets at both baseline and 4 years (2.22, 95% CI: 1.34–3.68, p<0.01) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Relationship between obesity in 2006 and the change in periodontal pockets.

Condition in 2002 and 2006 Number of subjects in 2006 (n, %) Adjusted OR (95%CI)
Non-obesity Obesity
(n=1,479, 91.4%) (n=140, 8.6%)
Periodontal pockets
 Without pocket at both times 934 (92.8) 72 (7.2) 1
 With pocket only in 2006 169 (91.9) 15 (8.1) 0.95 (0.52–1.75)
 With pocket only in 2002 196 (90.7) 20 (9.3) 1.12 (0.65–1.95)
 With pocket at both times 180 (84.5) 33 (15.5) 2.22 (1.34–3.68)**
**

p<0.01.

Confounders: hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, smoking habit, making an effort to maintain a healthy body weight, toothbrushing frequency, age, and gender. OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval.

Discussion

In this cohort study, we showed that periodontitis and toothbrushing frequency may have an effect on the onset of obesity. This study can increase our knowledge of the events related to development of obesity, and improve our understanding of how dental health care may influence this clinical condition.

One of the most widely used indices of obesity is BMI. While the WHO defines obesity as BMI ≥30, in this study, as all the participants were Japanese, a BMI ≥25 was considered obese as per the guidelines of the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity, which is based on studies that have reported that BMI ≥25 in the Japanese population are associated with increased prevalence of glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension [20,24]. The incidence of obesity in 4 years of follow-up was 8.6% and there was no subject with BMI ≥30 by the end of the study period. The mean age of the participants was 40 years and consisted mostly of men. This incidence was largely consistent with that reported in previous studies [25,26]. In fact, in the Japan Public Health Center Study, a multipurpose cohort study, the incidence of obesity (BMI ≥25) in a 10-year follow-up period was 12.5%, 9.1%, and 7% among men aged 40–44, 50–54, and 60–64 years, respectively; the prevalence of obesity decreased with age and was slightly lower among women than among men [25]. Additionally, a large-scale study among Japanese reported that from age 50 years onwards, the prevalence of obesity decreased among men but increased among women; consequently, from age 60 years onwards, obesity becomes more prevalent among women [26].

Previous studies have found a relationship between obesity and periodontal disease [911]. Li et al. [12], who studied a group of subjects aged 12–18 years, reported that obesity at age 15 years was associated with periodontal diseases at age 18 years; however, there was no significant association between periodontal diseases at age 12 or 15 years and obesity at age 15 or 18 years. Nonetheless, in previous studies that we conducted with subjects negative for all indicators of metabolic syndrome, including obesity [22,27], we observed a significant association between the cumulative duration of having periodontal disease and obesity 9 years later [22], although a significant association between periodontal disease at baseline and onset of obesity in a 4-year follow-up period was not observed [27]. In the present study, we examined subjects who were not obese at baseline (although the baseline blood pressure, blood glucose, and lipid values exceeded the reference values in some subjects), and we observed a significant association between periodontitis (having periodontal pockets) at baseline and the onset of obesity after 4 years, when adjustments for confounders including hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, smoking status, ability to maintain a healthy body weight, age, and sex were made. These findings suggest that periodontitis in adulthood increases the risk of future obesity. To determine the change in the status of periodontitis after 4 years, we divided the subjects into 4 groups based on the presence of periodontal pockets at baseline and/or 4 years later, and investigated its association with the onset of obesity. The multiple logistic analysis revealed that the group of participants with periodontal pockets at both the baseline and 4 years later showed a significantly higher OR (2.22, p<0.01) for onset of obesity than in the group of subjects without periodontal pockets at both the baseline and 4 years later. These results suggest that periodontitis as a risk factor for obesity is a modifiable factor, and the risk of obesity may be elevated in people with untreated periodontitis. Still, multiple logistic regression analysis did not show an association of baseline hypertension, hyperglycemia, or dyslipidemia with the onset of obesity in the 4-year follow-up period.

In contrast, we observed an inverse relationship between toothbrushing frequency at baseline and the onset of obesity 4 years later: subjects with a high toothbrushing frequency (i.e., good toothbrushing practice) were considered to have a low risk of becoming obese. Other studies have also reported a relationship between these parameters, including a cross-sectional study using the results of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [21]. However, to the best of our knowledge, our study is the first longitudinal study to demonstrate this. It was reported that brushing teeth as frequently as ≥3 times/day is associated with a low risk of developing diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia [18], and metabolic syndrome [19]. Our findings are in agreement with these studies, as the onset of obesity underlies these metabolic abnormalities.

Toothbrushing effectively reduces the levels of oral bacteria and gingivitis [28]. Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease caused by persistent infection by periodontopathic bacteria, and which often progresses without subjective symptoms. In a 4-year cohort study involving working adults, Yamazaki et al. [29] reported that subjects who brushed their teeth frequently (≥3 times/day) had a low risk of developing periodontal pockets. In contrast, patients with periodontitis are known to have elevated blood levels of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6 [30,31]. Additionally, periodontal disease is considered a chronic disease that spreads mildly, but systemically [32,33]. In an in vitro study, stimulation of adipocytes with CRP and inflammatory cytokines led to enhanced differentiation of adipocytes and elevated production of maturation-promoting proteinases such as matrix metalloproteinases [34]. Furthermore, induced experimental periodontitis in rats resulted in elevated levels of the monocyte chemotactic factor (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) in serum and lipids in the liver [35]. Therefore, considering these epidemiological, in vitro, and animal data, our results suggest that good toothbrushing practices are effective in preventing periodontitis and, consequently, in reducing the risk of developing obesity.

Exercise and dietary habits are major determinants of obesity and can affect its onset as confounding factors [1]; however, we adjusted for lifestyle habits related to caloric intake and expenditure, which were determined by asking subjects whether they were maintaining a healthy body weight in the multiple logistic regression analysis. This analysis revealed that there is a significant association between the onset of obesity and a positive response to the question, “Are you making an effort to maintain a healthy body weight?” (Table 3). Even when dividing subjects into 4 groups based on the answer to this question at baseline and 4 years later (“yes” at both baseline and 4 years, “yes” at baseline only, “yes” at 4 years only, and “no” at both times), multiple logistic analysis still indicated that the group who answered yes at both times and the group who answered yes at 4 years only had significantly lower ORs (0.14 for yes at both times and 0.27 for yes at 4 years only, p<0.01) for the onset of obesity than the group who answered no at both times (data not shown). These findings might indicate that this item of the questionnaire reflected regular exercise habits or dietary habit, but these habits were not directly examined in this study. Moreover, these findings also indicate that the main cause of obesity is recent excess calorie intake, which is largely caused by inadequate healthy lifestyle habits.

The present study has some limitations. We used BMI, but obesity can be assessed in several other ways, such as waist and hip circumferences, and subcutaneous fat thickness [3,12]. These indicators aid in estimating central obesity, which is more closely linked to metabolic syndrome than BMI is [20]. Moreover, we evaluated periodontitis based on CPI, which only evaluates index teeth and can potentially underestimate the degree of periodontitis. The question about smoking in this study also did not clarify the duration or the frequency of smoking. These limitations were mainly because we used the results of regular medical health checkups, which are designed and conducted specifically to help working adults to manage their health. Therefore, further understanding of the causal relationship between periodontitis/toothbrushing frequency and the onset of obesity may require not only cohort studies, using methods that enable a greater characterization of subjects’ obesity, lifestyle, and periodontitis status, but also interventional studies.

Conclusions

The presence/absence of periodontal pockets and toothbrushing frequency were found to be significantly associated with the onset of obesity. Our findings suggest that periodontal pockets ≥4 mm might increase the risk of obesity, while frequent toothbrushing might reduce its risk.

Footnotes

Source of support: This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (grant no. 17K12022) from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science, by the Sato and the Uemura Funds, and by the Dental Research Center of Nihon University School of Dentistry

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000;404(6778):635–43. doi: 10.1038/35007508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19·2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1377–96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30054-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hu H, Nakagawa T, Okazaki H, et al. Cumulative risk of type 2 diabetes in a working population: The Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study. J Epidemiol. 2018;28(11):465–69. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Veronesi G, Borchini R, Landsbergis P, et al. Cardiovascular disease prevention at the workplace: Assessing the prognostic value of lifestyle risk factors and job-related conditions. Int J Public Health. 2018;63(6):723–32. doi: 10.1007/s00038-018-1118-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saito T, Shimazaki Y, Koga T, et al. Relationship between upper body obesity and periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2001;80(7):1631–36. doi: 10.1177/00220345010800070701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wood N, Johnson RB, Streckfus CF. Comparison of body composition and periodontal disease using nutritional assessment techniques: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(4):321–27. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saxlin T, Ylöstalo P, Suominen-Taipale L, et al. Association between periodontal infection and obesity: results of the Health 2000 Survey. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(3):236–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01677.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim EJ, Jin BH, Bae KH. Periodontitis and obesity: A study of the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Periodontol. 2011;82(4):533–42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chaffee BW, Weston SJ. Association between chronic periodontal disease and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2010;81(12):1708–24. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martinez-Herrera M, Silvestre-Rangil J, Silvestre FJ. Association between obesity and periodontal disease. A systematic review of epidemiological studies and controlled clinical trials. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22(6):e708–15. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nascimento GG, Leite FR, Correa MB, et al. Does periodontal treatment have an effect on clinical and immunological parameters of periodontal disease in obese subjects? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(4):639–47. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1678-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li LW, Wong HM, McGrath CP. Longitudinal association between obesity and periodontal diseases among secondary school students in Hong Kong: A prospective cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0659-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morita I, Okamoto Y, Yoshii S, et al. Five-year incidence of periodontal disease is related to body mass index. J Dent Res. 2011;90(2):199–202. doi: 10.1177/0022034510382548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jimenez M, Hu FB, Marino M, et al. Prospective associations between measures of adiposity and periodontal disease. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012;20(8):1718–25. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gorman A, Kaye EK, Apovian C, et al. Overweight and obesity predict time to periodontal disease progression in men. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(2):107–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01824.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van der Weijden F, Slot DE. Oral hygiene in the prevention of periodontal diseases: The evidence. Periodontol 2000. 2011;55(1):104–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lertpimonchai A, Rattanasiri S, Arj-Ong Vallibhakara S, et al. The association between oral hygiene and periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Dent J. 2017;67:332–43. doi: 10.1111/idj.12317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuwabara M, Motoki Y, Sato H, et al. Low frequency of toothbrushing practices is an independent risk factor for diabetes mellitus in male and dyslipidemia in female: A large-scale, 5-year cohort study in Japan. J Cardiol. 2017;70(2):107–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tanaka A, Takeuchi K, Furuta M, et al. Relationship of toothbrushing to metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(5):538–47. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Matsuzawa Y. Metabolic syndrome – Definition and diagnostic criteria in Japan. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2005;12(6):301. doi: 10.5551/jat.12.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Park JB, Nam GE, Han K, et al. Obesity in relation to oral health behaviors: An analysis of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2010. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(5):3093–100. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Morita T, Yamazaki Y, Fujiharu C, et al. Association between the duration of periodontitis and increased cardiometabolic risk factors: A 9-year cohort study. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2016;14(10):475–82. doi: 10.1089/met.2016.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G, et al. Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN) Int Dent J. 1982;32(3):281–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aizawa Y, Kamimura N, Watanabe H, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors are really linked in the metabolic syndrome: this phenomenon suggests clustering rather than coincidence. Int J Cardiol. 2006;109(2):213–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Matsushita Y, Takahashi Y, Mizoue T, et al. Overweight and obesity trends among Japanese adults: A 10-year follow-up of the JPHC Study. Int J Obes. 2008;32(12):1861–67. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kuzuya M, Ando F, Iguchi A, Shimokata H. Age-specific change of prevalence of metabolic syndrome: longitudinal observation of large Japanese cohort. Atherosclerosis. 2007;191(2):305–12. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Morita T, Yamazaki Y, Mita A, et al. A cohort study on the association between periodontal disease and the development of metabolic syndrome. J Periodontol. 2010;81(4):512–19. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Theilade E, Wright WH, Jensen SB, Löe H. Experimental gingivitis in man. II. A longitudinal clinical bacteriological investigation. J Periodont Res. 1966;1:1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1966.tb01842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamazaki Y, Morita T, Fujiharu C, et al. [The association between oral health behavior and development of periodontal pocket – A cohort analysis using data from Japanese adults with routine dental checkups in occupational settings]. J Dent Health. 2018;68(1):21–27. [in Japanese] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Saito T, Murakami M, Shimazaki Y, et al. Association between alveolar bone loss and elevated serum C-reactive protein in Japanese men. J Periodontol. 2003;74(12):1741–46. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Loos BG, Craandijk J, Hoek FJ, et al. Elevation of systemic markers related to cardiovascular diseases in the peripheral blood of periodontitis patients. J Periodontol. 2000;71(10):1528–34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.10.1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nishimura F, Soga Y, Iwamoto Y, et al. Periodontal disease as part of the insulin resistance syndrome in diabetic patients. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2005;7(1):16–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Slade GD, Ghezzi EM, Heiss G, et al. Relationship between periodontal disease and C-reactive protein among adults in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(10):1172–79. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.10.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nakai K, Tanaka H, Yamanaka K, et al. Effects of C-reactive protein on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors via Fcγ receptors on 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(5):484–93. doi: 10.7150/ijms.18059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tanaka H, Nakai K, Murakami F, et al. Ligature-induced periodontitis increased insulin resistance and triglyceride levels in Wistar rats. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2017;26(3):261–67. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES