Abstract
Brugada syndrome is a channelopathy characterized on ECG by coved ST‐segment elevation (≥2 mm) in the right precordial leads and is associated with an increased risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The term Brugada phenocopy is proposed to describe conditions that induce Brugada‐like ECG manifestations in patients without true Brugada syndrome. An extensive review of the literature identified case reports that were classified according to their suspected etiological mechanism. Future directions to learn more about these intriguing cases is discussed.
Keywords: Brugada syndrome, Brugada‐like ECG pattern, Brugada‐like ECG findings, Brugada syndrome mimicry
Brugada syndrome is a putative channelopathy characterized on ECG by a coved ST‐segment elevation (≥2 mm) and subsequent inverted T wave in a minimum of two right precordial leads (Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern). It is associated with a propensity for malignant ventricular arrhythmias leading to sudden cardiac death in the absence of structural heart disease. The syndrome has been linked to over 80 mutations in the SCN5A gene and demonstrates an autosomal dominant mode of transmission. 1
The distinct Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern is dynamic and can often be concealed. Unmasking of the ECG signature can be accomplished by sodium channel blockers and febrile states. 1 In addition, some drugs and conditions can induce a Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern in the absence of true congenital Brugada syndrome, representing a discrete clinical entity with a different pathophysiology. 1
Presently, the terminology used in the literature to describe Brugada Type‐1 ECG patterns induced in patients without Brugada syndrome is diverse and variable, including acquired forms of Brugada syndrome, Brugada‐like ECG patterns, Brugada‐like ECG findings, Brugada‐like ECG ST‐segment abnormalities, and Brugada syndrome mimicry. The lack of consensus throughout the literature is confusing and creates uncertainty when differentiating between congenital Brugada syndrome,unmasked Brugada syndrome, and an induced Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern in the absence of the true condition. It would be advantageous to unify the nomenclature under a single, reasonable descriptor. Riera et al. introduced the term “Brugada phenocopy” to describe an acquired Brugada‐like ECG pattern in the setting of propofol infusion syndrome. 2 As discussed by Riera, the term phenocopy describes “an environmental condition that imitates one produced by a gene” and serves as a reasonable, succinct description of acquired Brugada‐like manifestations. 3
Although there has been advancement in our understanding of true Brugada syndrome, there is currently limited discussion in the literature of the underlying mechanisms by which Brugada phenocopies develop.
The objective of this study is to review all published cases of Brugada phenocopies and classify them according to their pathogenesis. To understand how different mechanisms can produce a Brugada pattern in the absence of the genetic mutation, we will briefly discuss the current theories that explain the ECG manifestations and arrhythmogenesis of true Brugada syndrome.
CURRENT THEORIES EXPLAINING TRUE BRUGADA ECG MANIFESTATIONS
Depolarization Theory
The depolarization theory hypothesizes that the ST‐segment elevation is caused by the conduction delay in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), and the ventricular arrhythmia associated with the Brugada syndrome is induced by the abnormal current created by the delayed depolarization of the RVOT. 4 , 5 , 6 This model is based on the mechanism explaining ST‐segment elevation in regional transmural ischemia, where large potential difference between ischemic and nonischemic regions create current that reflects as ST‐segment elevation. 7 The delayed depolarization of the RVOT with respect to the other RV action potentials creates a potential difference between the right ventricle and the RVOT. The membrane potential of the RVOT is more negative than that of the RV during the hatch phase action potential. Hence, the intercellular current flows toward the RVOT, and the extracellular current travels away from the RVOT, forming a closed circuit. At the RVOT, the current conducts from the RVOT intercellular space to the extracellular space, traveling toward the ECG electrode positioned over the RVOT (V2IC3). The current is reflected as the elevated ST segment on V2IC3. Similarly, another current traveling between the RVOT and the RV is formed at the end of the action potential given that now the RVOT becomes more positive than the RV; the later current travels in the opposite direction of earlier current and is reflected as the negative T wave seen on V2IC3. Similar to regional transmural ischemia, ventricular tachyarrhythmias seen in Brugada syndrome patients is believed to originate from the border zone between early and delayed depolarizations. 7 Delayed conduction is presumably caused by discrete structural abnormalities in the RV wall, preferentially in the RVOT. Strong evidence for this substrate is provided by recent epicardial mapping studies in 10 severely symptomatic patients, demonstrating fractionated potentials during 200–300 ms after the QRS complex. Substrate ablation resulted in resolution of the ST‐segment elevation and associated arrhythmias. 8 Further evidence from body surface maps (BSM) indicating heterogeneity of depolarization activity in the RVOT supports the depolarization theory. 5 Epicardial electrograms recorded at the conus branch of the right coronary artery also indicated abnormality in the RVOT in some of the patients with Brugada syndrome, providing support for the depolarization theory. 6
Repolarization Theory
The repolarization theory was founded on experimental data from studies using canine coronary‐perfused right ventricular wedge preparations. According to this theory, a reduced inward sodium current and prominent outward current leads to the accentuation of the action potential notch in the right ventricular epicardium relative to the endocardium. 4 This produces a transmural voltage gradient, which manifests electrocardiographically as the characteristic ST‐segment elevation seen in Brugada syndrome. At the end of phase 1, certain epicardial sites undergo all‐or‐none repolarization, losing their action potential dome and resulting in the development of a local epicardial dispersion of repolarization. This heterogeneous repolarization environment leads to phase 2 reentry and coupled extrasystoles when action potential domes migrate from sites where they are present to sites where they were lost. A transmural dispersion of repolarization and extended refractory period are also generated, which presents the opportunity for the phase 2 reentry extrasystoles to trigger polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. 4
Cardiac Neural Crest Cell Theory
Elizari et al. 9 proposed that the Brugada syndrome phenotype may be explained by abnormal expression of neural crest cells in the development of myocardial structures, primarily the RVOT. They hypothesize that the RVOT and its nearby structures have different embryologic origins than the rest of the heart and consequently possess different physiological, anatomical, and clinical characteristics. As well, the RVOT is identified as a vulnerable region of the heart based on the observation that conditions and drugs, which typically exhibit diffuse and uniform depolarization and/or repolarization changes have the greatest effect in the RVOT. The neural crest cell theory is built upon the idea that the Brugada syndrome manifestations are due to two underlying electrophysiologic mechanisms: heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization, which follows the concepts of the repolarization theory outlined earlier, and abnormal conduction slowing in the RVOT. 9
The cardiac neural crest is vital in the morphogenesis of the RVOT and its neighboring structures. An essential molecule in the regulation of neural crest development is connexin 43 (Cx43), which is a gap junction protein that contributes to neural crest cell migration and the propagation properties of the cardiac impulse. Gap junctional communication facilitated by Cx43 has been linked to the differentiation of neural crest cells into cardiac myocytes. Consequently, improper gap junctional communication in the RVOT leads to errors in cardiac neural crest cell expression, which may result in tissue remodeling and altered gap junctional channel configuration. These abnormal changes in the myocardium provide a possible explanation for the repolarization heterogeneities contributing to the Brugada syndrome phenotype. In addition, the transmural and regional heterogenic Cx43 distribution resulting from tissue remodeling can cause the conduction slowing and late action of the RVOT that underlies Brugada syndrome manifestations. 9
THE BRUGADA PHENOCOPY CONCEPT
Of importance in understanding the concept of Brugada phenocopies, is distinguishing between these entities and cases of unmasked congenital Brugada syndrome. In the latter case, concealed or latent ECG manifestations are unmasked by certain agents and conditions in the presence of true Brugada syndrome. The defining feature of a Brugada phenocopy is the absence of true Brugada syndrome despite the presence of characteristic Brugada Type‐1 ECG findings.
In accordance with the previously discussed repolarization theory, the characteristic ST‐segment elevation seen in Brugada phenocopies can be explained by a transmural gradient that arises from an accentuated Ito‐mediated action potential notch and a loss of the AP dome in the epicardium but not the endocardium. The loss of the AP dome can result from a disruption in the homeostasis of active inward and outward currents at the end of phase 1 of the AP. 10 Specifically, any mechanism that increases outward currents (i.e., Ito, adenosine triphosphate‐sensitive potassium current [IK‐ATP], delayed rectifier potassium current [IKs,IKr]) or decreases outwards currents (i.e., ICa‐L, fast INa) will result in the characteristic ST‐segment elevation seen in the Brugada Type‐1 ECG. 10 This provides a possible explanation of the general, underlying pathogenesis of the diverse forms of Brugada phenocopies.
UNMASKING TRUE BRUGADA SYNDROME BY FEVER IS DIFFERENT FROM BRUGADA PHENOCOPY
The relationship between febrile states and the Brugada syndrome is a particularly interesting phenomenon that deserves elaboration. There are numerous published cases of fever unmasking or accentuating the ECG manifestations of Brugada syndrome which are occasionally accompanied by ventricular arrhythmias. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30
Upon review, all these cases demonstrated the normalization of Brugada ECG findings with resolution of the fever and no family history of sudden death. In only one case did the patient report a history of syncope, which involved several episodes associated with a past febrile episode. The results of drug provocation testing upon defervescence were mixed: some cases reports elicited a Brugada ECG pattern 12 , 13 , 19 , 23 whereas the remainder described negative findings or did not indicate whether the test was completed.
A possible mechanism by which fever unmasks true Brugada syndrome can be explained by temperature‐sensitive SCN5A mutations. Using mammalian cell lines, Dumaine et al. demonstrated that Thr1620Met missense mutations on the SCN5A gene are temperature dependent, resulting in dysfunction at elevated temperatures due to the accelerated decay of inward sodium currents (INa). 29 Consequently, febrile states may exacerbate the mutant sodium channels, leading to an accentuation or unmasking of ECG manifestations and an increased risk of malignant arrhythmias in patients with Brugada syndrome. In addition, Keller et al. discovered a novel SCN5A mutation (F1344S) in a patient with Brugada syndrome and fever‐induced ventricular fibrillation. 30 The authors presented evidence that sodium channel dysfunction coupled with a febrile state can lead to a shift in activation that is sufficient to produce Brugada ECG manifestations. 30
The positive and negative predictive values of the sodium channel blockage test using flecainide among SCN5A‐positive patients and their family members were 96% and 36% respectively. 31 Given such a low negative predictive value, negative sodium blocker test results for fever‐induced Brugada syndrome patients may not be sufficient to classify these cases as Brugada phenocopies.
The unmasking of concealed Brugada syndrome during febrile states may increase the risk of life‐threatening cardiac arrhythmias. 27
Juntila et al. reported that the induction of a Brugada ECG pattern during acute events, including fever, can lead to the development of malignant arrhythmias even in the absence of a SCN5A mutation. 32 Prompt recognition and treatment with antipyretics is indicated and may be lifesaving.
UNMASKING TRUE BRUGADA SYNDROME BY SODIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS IS DIFFERENT FROM BRUGADA PHENOCOPY
Of the three types of Brugada ECG patterns, only the Type‐1 manifestations are considered to be a positive diagnostic sign of Brugada syndrome. Type‐2 and 3 ECG are not considered diagnostic on their own, however, conversion of either of these ECG patterns to a Type‐1 ECG via the administration of a sodium channel blocker is considered to be diagnostic for Brugada syndrome. 1 Currently, there are four sodium channel blockers used to unmask a Brugada Type‐1 ECG in a patient suspected to have Brugada syndrome: two class 1A antiarrhythmic agents, ajmaline and procainamide, and two class 1C antiarrhythmic agents, flecainide and pilsicainide. 1 , 33 In addition, propafenone is another class 1C antiarrhymthic agent that can unmask Type‐1 ECG manifestations through sodium channel blocking effects but is not used for diagnostic purposes. All five of these antiarrhythmic agents have been associated with malignant arrhythmias. 33
Following the organizational scheme outlined by Postema et al. (http://www.brugadadrugs.org), 33 there are two broad categories of agents that can unmask a Brugada Type‐1 ECG: (1) agents that have a clear association with malignant arrhythmias, and (2) agents without a clear risk of inducing arrhythmias. 33 These categories will arbitrarily be referred to as Group 1 and 2 drugs, respectively.
Group 1 is composed of tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, clomipramine, desipramine, and nortriptyline), antipsychotic agents (loxapine and trifluoperazine), lithium, bupivacaine, propofol, acetylcholine, alcohol, cocaine, and ergonovine. 33 Akin to the antiarrhythmic agents previously described, nearly all these substances induce a Type‐1 ECG by augmenting ST‐segment elevation in leads V1–V3 via sodium channel blockade. 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 Given the mechanistic similarity to the diagnostic agents that unmask true Brugada syndrome, it would suggest that Group 1 drugs also function to unmask rather than mimic Brugada syndrome. Consequently, the Group 1 drugs for the most part cannot be considered Brugada phenocopies.
There are a few exceptions. Acetylcholine, ergonovine, and alcohol act on sites other than sodium channels to induce a Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern. 34 , 35 Acetylcholine and ergonovine have been reported to decrease inward calcium channels, accentuating the action potential notch and leading to ST‐segment elevation and ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome. 34 Similarly, alcohol has been shown to inhibit calcium channels as well. 35 There are at least two documented cases of alcohol associated with Brugada ECG manifestations. The first case involved a patient diagnosed with Brugada syndrome who developed a sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia from alcohol provocation. 36 It is uncertain whether or not the alcohol had a role in unmasking or accentuating ST‐segment elevation, so this case may be outside the scope of our current discussion. The other case was of a patient who presented with both alcohol and fluoxetine intoxication. Fluoxetine has been shown to induce a Type‐1 ECG as well, so it is difficult to determine whether the ECG changes were due to alcohol or fluoxetine in this case. 44 Noda et al. report that acetylcholine and ergonovine are capable of augmenting ST‐segment elevation in patients with Brugada syndrome, however, there is yet to be reports of either substance acting as a Brugada phenocopy. 34 It is evident that additional investigation is required to discern exactly how acetylcholine, ergonovine, and alcohol relate to Brugada syndrome and/or Brugada phenocopies.
The Group 2 drugs include antiarrhythmic drugs (amiodarone, cibenzoline, disopyramide, lidocaine, verapamil, and propranolol), psychotropic drugs (carbamazepine, cyamemazine, dosulepine, doxepin, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, imipramine, maprotiline, paroxetine, perphenazine, phenytoin, and thioridazine), analgesics/ anesthetics (ketamine and tramadol), dimenhydrinate, diphenhydramine, edrophonium, indapamide, metoclopramide, and terfenadine. 33 All Group 2 drugs are all either confirmed or believed to possess sodium channel blocking effects. 33 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 There are also a number of antianginal drugs that may be associated with a Type‐1 ECG, 1 , 33 however, given the current lack of evidence on the existence and nature of this relationship, the issue was not explored in this article. As well, not yet included on the “Brugada drugs” Website is a case of cannabis intoxication eliciting a Brugada‐like ECG pattern. Not unlike the majority of agents associated with the Type‐1 ECG, Daccarett et al. speculate that the manifestations are due to the sodium channel blocking effects of cannabis. 71 As a result, a Brugada Type‐1 ECG associated with the Group 2 drugs and cannabis suggests that they are cases of unmasked Brugada syndrome rather than Brugada phenocopy.
NEW PROPOSAL FOR A CLASSIFICATION OF BRUGADA PHENOCOPIES
Methods
Search Strategy
A literature review was performed on the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R) from 1947 to January Week 4 2011, EMBASE from 1980 to February Week 1 2011 and PubMed (March Week 1, 2011).
On all of the databases, the “Brugada Syndrome” MeSH heading search results were combined with key word search results for “Brugada‐like,”“mimicking Brugada,”“induced Brugada syndrome,”“Brugada type,”“Brugada sign,”“Brugada‐pattern,” and “acquired Brugada,” The combined search results were initially reviewed by two reviewers (MR, TN). Case reports were selected according to the inclusion criteria described below and ambiguous cases were reviewed by an expert electrophysiologist (AB) until consensus was reached.
In addition, the references of the included papers were reviewed for any outstanding case reports that were missed in the initial search.
Inclusion Criteria
-
1
The case report is published.
-
2
The case describes a patient with a Brugada ECG pattern (Type‐1, 2, or 3) that is confirmed by an ECG tracing included in the article.
-
3
The patient described in the case does not have true Brugada syndrome, which is determined by an assessment of low clinical probability (symptoms, past medical history, family history), genetic testing, and/or provocative testing with flecainide, ajmaline, or procainamide or other sodium channel blockers.
Exclusion Criteria
-
1
The case is an example of the unmasking of an underlying true (or possible) Brugada syndrome.
-
2
The Brugada ECG pattern is likely due to the administration of flecainide, ajmaline or procainamide. These drugs are commonly used in provocative testing as a means of diagnosing true Brugada syndrome. Cases associated with other drugs, which their mechanism of action is blocking sodium channels are listed separately in section “unmasking Brugada syndrome.”
RESULTS
Thirty‐one cases were identified as meeting our inclusion criteria. 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 To confirm these cases as manifestations of Brugada phenocopies, we first sought to assess the clinical probability that the patients had true Brugada syndrome. A patient was thought to have a low clinical probability of having true Brugada syndrome if they had a negative sodium channel blocker challenge test result, a lack of family history of syncope or sudden death, no previous history of syncope or cardiac arrhythmia, and was afebrile. Some cases fell under multiple categories and in those instances we assigned classification based on the most probable or dominant mechanism thought to induce the Brugada ECG pattern.
Five general categories were devised based on the underlying mechanism and are as follows: metabolic conditions, mechanical compression, ischemia, myocardial/pericardial diseases, and miscellaneous (Table 1).
Table 1.
Category | Number of Individuals (Number of Case Reports) | Mean Age (Range) | Male: Female | ECG Type | Presence of Structural Heart Disease | Case Report References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Metabolic conditions | 14(14) | 51.9 ± 17.8 | 13:1 | 13 Type‐I | 0 Y | 72–85 |
(28–89) | 5 Type‐II | 14 N | ||||
4 Variable | ||||||
Mechanical compression | 6(5) | 45.7 ± 18.5 | 3:3 | 6 Type‐I | 3 Y | 86–90 |
(19–66) | 0 Type‐II | 3 N | ||||
0 Variable | ||||||
Ischemia | 4(4) | 60.0 ± 6.7 | 2:2 | 4 Type‐I | 91–94 | |
(55–68) | 1 Type‐II | 1 Y | ||||
1 Variable | 3 N | |||||
Myocardial & | 8(6) | 46.2 ± 13.9 | 5:3 | 5 Type‐I | 2 Y | 95–100 |
pericardial disease | (28–72) | 4 Type‐II | 6 N | |||
2 Variable | ||||||
Miscellaneous | 2(2) | 22.5 ± 0.7 | 1:1 | 2 Type‐I | 1 Y | 101–102 |
(22–23) | 1 Type‐II | 1 N | ||||
1 Variable |
Mean age is reported with ± standard deviation. ECG Type = presence of more than one type of Brugada ECG pattern.
Fourteen cases were included in the metabolic condition category. 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 Thirteen patients showed Brugada Type‐1 ECG and five showed Type‐2 ECG. Four of the patients’ ECG switched between a Brugada Type‐1 and a Type‐2 ECG pattern (i.e., had both). No case reported the presence of structural heart disease. The male to female ratio in this category was 13:1. The mean age was 51.9 ± 17.8 with a range of 28–89 years old. Fourteen cases were further categorized into three sub‐categories: hypothermia, electrolyte disturbance, and hypothyroidism (Table 2).
Table 2.
Categories | First Author (Publish year) | Descriptor | Age/Gender | EKG type | Structural Heart Disease | Note | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electrolyte disturbance | Irani (2010) 74 | Hyperkalemia | 46/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Cocaine use | ECG normalization after resolution of hyperkalemia |
Kovacic (2004) 76 | Acidosis, Hyponatremia Hyperkalemia | 38/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Polyuria, polydipsia | Normalization of ECG after treatment | |
Kurisu (2009) 77 | Hyperkalemia | 89/M | Type‐1 & 2 | Nonreported | Pancreatitis treatment with mesilate | Normalization of ECG after treatment | |
Kutsuzawa (2001) 78 | Hypokalemia | 53/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Hypokalemia | Normalization of ECG after treatment, ICD implants | |
Mehta (2009) 79 | Hypercalcemia | 62/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Rhabdomyolysis caused hypercalcemia | Normalization of ECG after treatment | |
Mok (2008) 80 | Hypokalemia Hyponatremia | 64/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Indapamide | Normalization of ECG after treatment | |
Ortega‐Carnicer (2002) 81 | Hyperkalemia | 34/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Diazepam and phenytoin administered | Normalization of ECG after hemodyalisis | |
Tamene (2010) 83 | Hyponatremia | 63/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Metoprolol, hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril, valproic acid and oral hypoglycemic | Normalization of ECG after serium sodium correction | |
Tanawuttiwat (2010) 84 | Hyperkalemia | 47/F | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Jaundice, leukocytosis, hepatitis with cirrhosis, thiamine and empiric antibiotics, renal failiure, respiratory distress | Died during treatment, no ventricular fibrillation or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia was noted | |
Electrolyte disturbance | Tsai (2010) 85 | Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis with hypokalemia | 51/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Low potassium, hypothyroidism, | Brugada ECG resolved after resolution of hypokalemia and hyper glycemia. |
Hypothermia | Ansari (2003) 72 | Hypothermia | 29/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Diabetes mellitus. | Normalization of ECG after regaining of temperature |
Bonnemeier (2008) 73 | Hypothermia | 28/M | Type‐2 | Nonreported | Severe hypothermia, | Normalization of ECG after regaining of temperature | |
Ortega‐Carnicer (2008) 82 | Hypothermia | 78/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | COPD | Normalization of ECG after regaining of temperature, patient died four weeks later from multiorganic failure | |
Hypo‐thyroidism | Khalil (2010) 75 | Adrenal insufficiency | 47/M | Type‐1 & 2 | Nonreported | Primary adrenal insufficiency, hyperkalemic | Normalization of ECG after steroid supplementation |
Descriptor = the primary condition that is believed to cause Brugada ECG pattern; M = male; F = female; Note = any medication taken or clinical condition that the patient presented; Outcome = resolution of Brugada ECG and patient mortality and morbidity, if available.
We identified five publications of Brugada phenocopies induced by mechanical compression 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 (Table 3). Six patients were described in the five publications and all patients developed a Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern. The cases were further categorized into the subcategory extracardiac mechanical compression. The male to female ratio was 1:1. Two Japanese patients had pectus excavatum, 86 and one Japanese patient had right ventricular hypertrophy. 87 Other publications did not report any structural heart disease. The mean age of this category was 45.7 ± 18.5 with the age range of 19–66 years old.
Table 3.
First Author (Publish Year) | Descriptor | Age/Gender | EKG type | Structural Heart Disease | Note | Outcome | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extracardiac | Kataoka | Pectus excavatum | 19/M | Type‐1 | – | A patient (30/M) | Not reported |
mechanical compression | (2002) 86 | 30/M | Type‐1 | showed confirmed reduced RV motion | |||
Nakazato (2003) 87 | Anterior mediastinal mass lesion | 52/F | Type‐1 | Right ventricular hypertrophy | Fever/ compression of RVOT | Gradual normalization of ECG after improvement of inflammatory markers | |
Sasaki (2010) 88 | Reconstructive operation for esophageal cancer | 63/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Compression of Anterior RV | Gradual normalization of ECG after treatment. | |
Tarin (1999) 89 | Mediastinal tumor | 66/F | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Amiodarone, Confirmed tumor displaced RVOT | 6 month follow‐up showed ECG without Brugada ECG | |
Tomcsanyi (2002) 90 | Hemopericardium | 44/F | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Tumor (organized hemopericardium) compressing the RV | Normal ECG after the removal of tumor |
Descriptor = primary condition that is believed to cause BRUGADA ECG pattern; M = male; F = female; Note = any medication taken or clinical condition that the patient presented; Outcome = resolution of Brugada ECG and patient mortality and morbidity, if available.
Four cases were identified as ischemia‐induced Brugada phenocopies. 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 All four patients had Brugada Type‐1 ECG, and one patient had an ECG that varied between Brugada Type‐1 and 2 ECG pattern. The male to female ratio was 1:1. The mean age was 60.0 ± 6.7 with the age range of 55–68 years old. One patient described by Eggebrecht et al. had left ventricular hypertrophy with reduced RV function and was resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation. 91 The cases were further categorized into two subcategories: right coronary and left coronary artery involvement (Table 4).
Table 4.
Categories | First Author (Publish Year) | Descriptor | Age/Gender | EKG type | Structural Heart Disease | Note | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Right coronary | Eggebrecht (2009) 91 | Isolated right ventricular infarction | 55/F | Type‐1 | Left ventricular hypertrophy with reduced RV function | Resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation | Not reported |
Nakazato (2000) 92 | Inferior myocardial infarction | 58/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Stenosis in the proximal segment of the right coronary artery | Not reported | |
Left coronary artery | Itoh (1999) 93 | Vasospastic angina | 68/M | Type‐1 | Nonreported | Intercostals neuralgia, orthostatic hypotension, ST‐segment exaggeration after procainamide administration | No syncope, dizziness, chest pain recurred during a follow‐up period of 13 months |
Tomcsanyi (2003) 94 | Acute myocardial infarction | 59/F | Type‐1 & 2 | Nonreported | Raised cardiac marker | Not reported |
Descriptor = the primary condition that is believed to cause Brugada ECG pattern; M = male; F = female; Note = any medication taken or clinical condition that the patient presented; Outcome = resolution of Brugada ECG and patient mortality and morbidity, if available.
The last category is Brugada phenocopies induced by myocardial and/or pericardial disease. This category includes six publications, describing nine patients. 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 Six patients showed Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern whereas four had Type‐2. Two patients had the ECG pattern switch between Type‐1 and 2. Bramos et al. described a patient that had concentric hypertrophy. 95 Nayyar et al. described a patient with biventricular severe global systolic dysfunction. 97 The myocardial and pericardial cases were further categorized into the following four subcategories: acute myocarditis, chronic myocarditis, acute pericarditis, and myotonic dystrophy. The male to female ratio was 2:1. The mean age of this category was 46.2 ± 13.9 with the age range of 28–72 years old (Table 5).
Table 5.
Categories | First Author (Publish Year) | Descriptor of Condition | Age/Gender | EKG type | Structural Heart Disease | Note | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acute myocarditis | Bramos (2009) 95 | Cardiac amyloidosis | 72/F | Type‐1 | Concentric hypertrophy | Narrow complex tachycardia was present | Normalization of ECG after 1 day |
Kim (2008) 96 | Hematologic disease leading to acute myocarditis | 42/M 46/M | Type‐1 Type‐1 &2 | Nonreported | Increase WBC count | Patient 1, ECG normalized after 2 months Patient 2 eventually died | |
Nayyar (2009) 97 | Myocarditis | 56/F | Type‐1 | Biventricular severe global systolic dysfunctions | Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning | Died on third day of admission from acute renal shutdown. | |
Chronic myocarditis | Brito (2010) 98 | Chagas disease cardiomyopathy | 56/F | Type‐1 & 2 | Nonreported | Syncope, palpitation, apical left ventricular aneurysm | Not reported |
Acute pericarditis | Ozeke (2006) 99 | Pericarditis | 28/M 36/M | Type‐2 | Nonreported | Both patients were afebrile, no prescription drug noted. | ECG normalized after treatment ibuprofen |
Myotonic dystrophy | Rudnik‐Schoneborn (2010) 100 | Myotonic dystrophy | 49/M | Type‐2 | Nonreported | Metformin, myotonic dystrophy confirmed by genetic testing | Not reported |
Descriptor = the primary condition that is believed to cause Brugada ECG pattern; M = male; F = female; Note = any medication taken or clinical condition that the patient presented; Outcome = resolution of Brugada ECG and patient mortality and morbidity, if available.
The last two publications, we identified as Brugada phenocopies, do not belong in any of the categories described above and so were classified as miscellaneous. One case presented Ebstein's anomaly. 101 This patient was a 23‐year‐old female who developed a Brugada Type‐1 ECG. The second case was a presentation of a Brugada phenocopy related to external electrocution. 102 The patient was a 22‐year‐old male who showed both Brugada Type‐1 and 2 ECG patterns (Table 6).
Table 6.
Categories | First Author (Publish Year) | Descriptor | Age/Gender | EKG type | Structural Heart Disease | Note | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tricuspid valve defect | Kaiser (2010) 101 | Ebstein's anomaly | 23/F | Type‐1 | Tricuspid valve defect | Left posterior fascicular block, right bundle branch block | Not reported |
External electrocution | Rangaraj (2009) 102 | Accidental electric burn | 22/M | Type‐1 & 2 | Nonreported | Persistent early repolarization, RBBB | ECG normalized over time |
Descriptor = the primary condition that is believed to cause Brugada ECG pattern; M = male; F = female; Note = any medication taken or clinical condition that the patient presented; Outcome = resolution of Brugada ECG and patient mortality and morbidity, if available.
DISCUSSION
Metabolic Conditions
Of the fourteen cases categorized as Brugada phenocopies induced by a metabolic condition, eleven cases were suspected to be a result of an electrolyte disturbance. The patients described in these cases had underlying conditions, such as hypokalemia, 78 , 80 , 85 hyperkalemia, 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 81 , 84 hyponatremia, 76 , 80 , 83 and hypercalcemia. 79 It has been speculated that electrolyte disturbances, such as hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and hypocalcemia, can amplify the transient outward current (Ito) mediated action potential notch and lead to the subsequent loss of the AP dome in the epicardium of the RVOT, which gives rise to a transmural voltage gradient and consequently produces the Brugada ECG pattern. 103
Hyperkalemia is thought to reproduce the Brugada sign by decreasing the resting membrane potential, which inactivates the cardiac sodium channels. 103 , 104 The level of the inactivation varies across the cardiac tissue, showing more pronounced inactivation in the anteroseptal region. 103 The inactivation of sodium channels leads to an imbalance between inward sodium current and outward potassium current, resulting in a predominantly outward potassium current. This outward current is most pronounced in the right ventricle and is more active in the epicardial cells than in the endocardium and M cells. 104 Based on the ionic mechanisms underlying Brugada syndrome proposed by Antzelevitch, 105 dominance of Ito may lead to the loss of the action potential dome in the right ventricular epicardium resulting in the Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern. Hyperkalemia, a common electrolyte disturbance in adrenal insufficiency, is believed to have induced the Brugada syndrome phenocopy. 76 It is worth noting that Littmann et al. showed a significant difference in the ECG manifestation between the hyperkalemic‐induced Brugada ECG pattern and the true Brugada ECG pattern. 103 The differences include wide complex rhythm or wide complex tachycardia without visible P waves and abnormal axis deviation notably seen in hyperkalemic‐induced Brugada phenocopy patients. 103 Whether this difference is also seen in other Brugada phenocopies induced by electrolyte disturbances is worth investigating.
Hypokalemia is also known to accentuate the Brugada ECG pattern by enhancing the Ito. 106 Whether hypocalcemia can also augment the Ito is unknown. Our review found only one case report of hypercalcemia‐induced Brugada phenocopy, 79 in which the authors did not speculate on the mechanism underlying the Brugada ECG manifestations. Hyponatremia is believed to reduce INa current due to a diminished ionic gradient, leaving the Ito unopposed which may cause a loss of the action potential dome in the right ventricular epicardium. 80 It is worth to note that individual case reports may favor the depolarization or the repolarization theory, however; we may prefer to leave both hypotheses open.
The remaining three cases were hypothermia‐induced Brugada phenocopies. 72 , 73 , 82 In all these cases, the Brugada ECG pattern resolved after normalization of body temperature. Ortega‐Carnicer et al. hypothesized that hypothermia causes a total loss of the epicardial action potential dome leading to coved ST‐segment elevation. 82 It has been previously demonstrated in vivo canine model that cooling the epicardium of the RVOT resulted in a reproducible generation of a Brugada‐like ECG pattern. 106 Furthermore, increased transmural dispersion and increased ventricular arrhythmogenesis were observed in canine models, raising the question that perhaps the high fatality rate in hypothermic patients can be, in part, attributed to cardiac arrhythmia linked to sodium channel dysfunction. This is only speculative, giving the fact that hypothermia induces repolarization changes that could be considered proarrhythmogenic by itself.
Ischemia
There is a limited number of Brugada phenocopy cases associated with ischemia currently in the literature, and the current understanding of the association between the two conditions is poor. We identified four case reports as ischemia‐related Brugada phenocopies. 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 Two of the cases were associated with right coronary artery as the culprit vessel, and the other two were linked to the left coronary artery. Out of the four cases, one case reported left ventricular hypertrophy with reduced RV function, 91 whereas the other three showed no structural heart disease. No family history of sudden cardiac death was reported and the clinical presentation suggested that the cases were true Brugada syndrome. Itoh et al. reported a case of coronary spasm accompanied by Brugada ECG pattern but suspected that the case was coincidental. 93 The other three cases were related to myocardial infarction, but there were no explanations offered as to how ischemia and Brugada ECG pattern may be related. 91 , 92 , 94
Mechanical Compression
Several cases reported mechanical compression as the main inducer of a Brugada phenocopy. A general trend is that the Brugada ECG normalizes after the source of mechanical compression is relieved. Tarin et al. reported the first case of compression‐induced Brugada phenocopy 89 in which the compression of the RVOT by a mediastinal tumor led to the Brugada‐like ECG pattern. The normalization of the ECG abnormalities after the removal of the tumor suggests that the mechanical compression was the cause. Nakazato et al. reported a similar case of a mass lesion compressing the RVOT and inducing the Brugada ECG. Once again the ECG normalized after the compression was relieved by antibiotic treatment. However, inflammation could have also played a role. 87 In addition, Kataoka et al. reported cases of Brugada ECG pattern related to pectus excavatum and suspected that long term mechanical injury to the right ventricular free led to the development of the Brugada phenocopy. 86
Myocardial and Pericardial Disease
Chagas’ disease is acquired from a parasitic infection by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi that can result in a form of chronic myocarditis. The majority of cases in North America have arisen from individuals who contracted the infection whereas in endemic areas outside the continent. 107 A historical paper from the Rosenbaum's team in the early ‘80s reported up to 7% of ST‐segment changes after the administration of ajmaline. 108 Some of these changes resemble the Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern. Since then, several reports suggested that in some patients with Chagas’ disease; a Brugada Type‐1 ECG can be found. 3 Brito et al. reported a case of a woman with a long‐time diagnosis of Chagas’ disease presenting with syncopal episodes and was found to have a Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern upon further investigation. 98 The authors speculate the ECG findings are due to the pathological changes associated with Chagas’ disease, particularly in the right ventricle (dromotropic disorders). The previously discussed depolarization theory attributes the Brugada ECG manifestations to conduction delays and depolarization abnormalities in the RVOT. In addition, although the Brugada syndrome has been defined as a condition without structural cardiac defects, there has been increasing evidence that these patients may have concealed structural abnormalities particularly in the region of the right ventricle. 98 , 109 Specifically, Takagi et al. found abnormalities in the right ventricle using electron beam computed tomography in patients with Brugada syndrome. 109
Myotonic dystrophy Type‐2 is a genetic condition that exhibits an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance and affects multiple organ systems, frequently including the heart. 100 A recent paper by Rudnik‐Schoneborn et al. describes two cases of myotonic dystrophy Type‐2 associated with a Brugada‐like ECG pattern. 100 The first involves a recent presentation of myotonic dystrophy in a patient that also had several near syncopal episodes. Genetic testing showed a missense mutation in the SCN5A gene and the patient's uncle died suddenly at 61 years old. The second is a chronic case of myotonic dystrophy in which the patient had two episodes of near syncope and induction of a Brugada Type‐2 ECG pattern upon ajmaline provocation, but was negative for SCN5A gene mutations and reported no family history for sudden cardiac death. Although Rudnik‐Schoneborn et al. addressed that these cases could represent a rare association of myotonic dystrophy and Brugada syndrome (particularly in the second case), they also proposed that myotonic dystrophy Type‐2 may behave as a Brugada phenocopy. This idea is supported by a French study that examined 500 cases of myotonic dystrophy Type‐1 and found that the incidence of Brugada‐like ECG pattern in this study sample was 80 times the incidence in the normal population. 110 The mechanism by which myotonic dystrophy may present as a Brugada phenocopy is still unclear and requires further investigation.
In addition, two cases of acute myocarditis leading to Brugada phenocopy were reported by Kim et al. 96 The first case presented with myocarditis due to hypereosinophilic syndrome, whereas the second was due to acute lymphoblastic leukemia with myocardial involvement. The authors speculated that the ECG manifestations may be due to isolated myocardial injury or infiltrative malignant cells leading to ischemia, localized conduction delay or spatial heterogeneity of refractoriness. 96
Bramos et al. documented the first case of a cardiac amyloidosis inducing an intermittent Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern. 95 Cardiac amyloidosis is an infiltrative disease that involves the deposition of protein fibrils in the myocardium, which can result in abnormalities in cardiac structure and conduction. In this case, the patient had experienced short episodes of presyncope in the past but no episodes of syncope and no family history of sudden cardiac death. Further investigations were denied by the patient so neither genetic testing or provocation testing were completed. The structural abnormalities that can result from cardiac amyloidosis include ventricular wall thickening, atrial enlargement, diastolic dysfunction, wall echogenicity and strain of myocardial contractile function. Defects can also arise with the conduction system and include prolongation of the infra‐His conduction times and H–V interval, which have been shown to be predictors of sudden cardiac death. 95 Although it is not completely clear how cardiac amyloidosis may precipitate a Brugada phenocopy, it would appear that the ECG changes can be attributed to the conduction and structural (particularly in the right ventricle) abnormalities of the disease.
There is also evidence of pericardial disease presenting as a Brugada phenocopy. Ozeke et al. reported on two separate cases of acute pericarditis presenting with an associated Brugada Type‐2 ECG pattern. 99 Currently, there is insufficient information in the literature to discern the mechanism by which acute pericarditis might induce Brugada phenocopies.
Miscellaneous
In our review of the literature, we encountered two cases of Brugada phenocopies that did not fit into the mechanistic categorization scheme outlined above, leading to the creation of a miscellaneous section.
The first case is a nonoperated Ebstein's anomaly inducing a Brugada ECG pattern. Also noted on the patient's ECG were signs of left posterior fascicular block (LPFB) associated with right bundle branch block (RBBB). The ECG manifestations are attributed to the activation of the left ventricular anterolateral wall and delayed activation of the left ventricular posteroinferior wall due to the LPFB. 101
In the second case, a young man presented with trauma sustained from an electrical burn injury associated with an ECG exhibiting a Brugada Type‐1 ECG pattern in lead V1 and a Type‐2 in lead V2. 102 His past medical history was unremarkable and there was no family history of syncope or sudden death. Because the ECG manifestations resolved spontaneously after 24 hours and his family members were found to have normal ECG recordings, no provocative testing or further investigations were pursued. Rangaraj et al. speculated that the Brugada phenocopy may have been caused by electrical injury to the myocardium resulting in spatial dispersion of repolarization. 102
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE BRUGADA PHENOCOPY CASE REPORT PUBLICATION
Having reviewed the case reports currently published on Brugada phenocopies, we would like to propose a few recommendations to ensure future case reports present a clear clinical picture that is distinct from the true Brugada syndrome (Table 7). Firstly, it is essential to include a 12‐lead ECG tracing with emphasis on the right precordial leads V1–V3. The ECG manifestations are a defining feature of the Brugada syndrome and Brugada phenocopies and thus a clear ECG tracing of reasonable quality is required. The inclusion of additional leads is desirable and highly recommendable. 111 Secondly, it is paramount to comment on the presence of a past medical history of syncope and a family history of sudden death or syncope, which can be of help in differentiating between true Brugada syndrome and Brugada phenocopies. Including whether or not provocative testing, genetic testing, and ECG tracings of immediate family members were recorded is also important in helping to rule out true Brugada syndrome. Finally, it would be beneficial to report whether the Brugada ECG pattern resolved after the treatment of the underlying cause; otherwise it is difficult to classify them as a Brugada phenocopy, because we cannot know whether the underlying condition was truly behind the Brugada ECG manifestation. It is important to document the resolution of the Brugada ECG to infer a direct association between the “environmental factor” and the Brugada ECG pattern.
Table 7.
Manifested Brugada Syndrome | Concealed Brugada Syndrome | Brugada Phenocopy | |
---|---|---|---|
ECG | Spontaneous ST‐segment elevation in one or more precordial leads, V1–3. | Normal ECG, ST‐segment elevation in precordial lead, V1–3 only when exposed to unmasking agents. | Normal ECG, Brugada Type‐1 or 2 ECG pattern induced by exposure to pathological conditions or drugs that are not known to be unmasking agent. |
Resolution of ECG | Spontaneous Brugada ECG persists | Brugada Type‐1 or 2 ECG pattern resolves once unmasking agent is withdrawn. | Brugada Type‐1 or 2 ECG pattern resolves once underlying condition is treated. |
Family history | Often associated with a family history of syncope and/or sudden death | Often associated with a family history of syncope and/or sudden death | Unlikely to have a family history of syncope or sudden death |
Patient outcome | Increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death | Increased risk of Cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death | Unknown |
In addition, it would be good practice for authors to comment on patient outcomes to further the investigation on whether there is a correlation between Brugada phenocopies and malignant cardiac arrhythmia.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the extensive and variable terminology currently in use to describe a Brugada‐like ECG pattern in the absence of true Brugada syndrome, our first objective was to propose the adoption of the term Brugada phenocopy, coined by Riera et al., to prevent confusion.
Given the growing collection of Brugada phenocopy cases, we believe our classification scheme based on etiological mechanism will provide much needed organization to current and future reports alike. From our examination, it would appear that most Brugada phenocopies may occur in relation to cardiac sodium channel blocking effects or cardiac structural abnormalities, particularly those affecting the right ventricle. We acknowledge that there is a need for further investigation on this topic to better understand each mechanism, but we hope to have provided an adequate starting framework for further discussion.
REFERENCES
- 1. Antzelevitch C, Brugada P, Borggrefe M, et al. Brugada syndrome: Report of the second consensus conference: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the European Heart Rhythm Association. Circulation 2005;111:659–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Riera ARP, Uchida AH, Schapachnik E, et al. Propofol infusion syndrome and Brugada syndrome electrocardiographic phenocopy. Cardiol J 2010;17:130–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Arce M, Riera ARP, Femenia F, et al. Brugada electrocardiographic phenocopy in a patient with chronic Chagasic cardiomyopathy. Cardiol J 2010;17:525–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wilde AA, Postema PG, DiDiego JM, et al. The pathophysiological mechanism underlying Brugada syndrome depolarization versus repolarization. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2010;49:543–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hisamatsu K, Kusano KF, Morita H, et al. Relationships between depolarization abnormality and repolarization abnormality in patients with Brugada Syndrome: Using body surface signal‐averaged electrocardiography and body surface maps. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004;15:870–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Nagase S, Kusano KF, Morita H, et al. Epicardial electrogram of the right ventricular outflow tract in patients with the Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1992–1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Janse MJ, Kleber AG. Electrophysiological changes and ventricular arrhythmias in the early phase of regional myocardial ischemia. Circ Res 1981;49:1069–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nademanee K, Veerakul G, Chandanamattha P, et al. Prevention of ventricular fibrillation episodes in Brugada syndrome by catheter ablation over the anterior right ventricular outflow tract epicardium. Circulation 2011;123:1270–1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Elizari MV, Levi R, Acunzo RS, et al. Abnormal expression of cardiac neural crest cells in heart development: A different hypothesis for the etiopathogenesis of Brugada syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:359–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Shimizu W. Acquired forms of the Brugada syndrome. J Electrocardiol 2005;38:22–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Abusin S. Brugada ECG pattern precipitated by acute pneumonia: A case report. Cases J 2009;2:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gavrielatos G, Letsas KP, Pappas LK, et al. Brugada electrocardiographic pattern induced during febrile state with marked leukocytosis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:135–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kalra S, Iskandar SB, Duggal S, et al. Fever‐induced ST‐segment elevation with a Brugada syndrome type electrocardiogram. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:82–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Karakitso D, Patrianakos A, Poularas J, et al. Brugada‐like electrocardiographic pattern unmasked by fever in a critical care patient. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006;50:1038–1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kusaka K, Yamakawa J, Kawaura K, et al. Brugada‐like electrocardiographic changes during influenza infection. J Int Med Res 2003;31:244–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Makaryus JN, Verbsky J, Schwartz S, et al. Fever associated with gastrointestinal shigellosis unmasks probable Brugada syndrome. Case Report Med 2009;492031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ott P, Freund NS. Brugada‐pattern EKG in a febrile patient. J Emerg Med 2007;33:281–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ozben B, Caymaz O, Erdogan O. Fever‐induced precordial ST‐segment elevation in a young man. Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi 2010;38:35–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ozeke O, Aras D, Geyik B, et al. Brugada‐type electrocardiographic pattern induced by fever. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2005;5:146–148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Patanè S, Marte F. Revelation of Brugada electrocardiographic pattern during a febrile state associated with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2010;144:e1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Porres JM, Brugada J, Urbistondo V, et al. Fever unmasking the Brugada syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:1646–1648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Saura D, Garcia‐Alberola A, Carrillo P, et al. Brugada‐like electrocardiographic pattern induced by fever. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:856–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Siniorakis E, Arvanitakis S, Psatheris G, et al. Recurrence of fever‐related Brugada pattern and right ventricular functional correlates. Int J Cardiol 2010;148:370–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Suzuki T, Kohsaka S. Brugada‐type electrocardiographic changes in a febrile patient of African descent. Am J Med Sci 2006;332:97–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Tsarouhas K, Papalexis P, Kafantaris I, et al. Electrocardiographic findings compatible with Brugada syndrome in a patient with febrile respiratory infection. Hippokratia 2010;14:221–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Unlu M, Bengi F, Amasyali B, et al. Brugada‐like electrocardiographic changes induced by fever. EMJ 2007; 24:e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Amin AS, Meregalli PG, Bardai A, et al. Fever increases the risk of cardiac arrest in the Brugada syndrome. Ann Int Medicine 2008;149:216–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Baranchuk A, Simpson CS. Brugada syndrome coinciding with fever and pandemic (H1N1) influenza. CMAJ 2011;183:582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Dumaine R, Towbin JA, Brugada P, et al. Ionic mechanisms responsible for the electrocardiographic phenotype of the Brugada syndrome are temperature dependent. Circ Res 1999;85:803–809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Keller DI, Rougier JS, Kucera JP, et al. Brugada syndrome and fever: Genetic and molecular characterization of patients carrying SCN5A mutations. Cardiovasc Res 2005;67:510–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Meregalli P, Ruijter J, Hofman N, et al. Diagnostic value of flecainide testing in unmasking SCN5A‐related Brugada syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17: 857–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Junttila MJ, Gonzalez M, Lizotte E, et al. Induced Brugada‐type electrocardiogram, a sign for imminent malignant arrhythmias. Circulation 2008;117:1890–1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Postema PG, Wolpert C, Amin AS, et al. Drugs and Brugada syndrome patients: Review of the literature, recommendations and an up‐to‐date website (http://www.brugadadrugs.org). Heart Rhythm 2009;6:1335–1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Noda T, Shimizu W, Taguchi A, et al. ST‐segment elevation and ventricular fibrillation without coronary spasm by intracoronary injection of acetylcholine and/or ergonovine maleate in patients with Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1841–1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Habuchi Y, Furukawa T, Tanaka H, et al. Ethanol inhibition of Ca2+ and Na +currents in the guinea‐pig heart. Eur J Pharmcol 1995;292:143–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Shimada M, Miyazaki T, Miyoshi S, et al. Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in a patient with Brugada syndrome. Jpn Circ J 1996;60:364–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Akhtar M, Goldschlager NF. Brugada electrocardiographic pattern due to tricyclic antidepressant overdose. J Electrocardiol 2006;39:336–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bebarta VS, Waksman JC. Amitriptyline‐induced Brugada pattern fails to respond to sodium bicarbonate. Clin Toxicol 2007;45:186–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bebarta VS, Summers S. Brugada electrocardiographic pattern induced by cocaine toxicity. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:827–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bolognesi R, Tsialtas D, Vasini P, et al. Abnormal ventricular repolarization mimicking myocardial infarction after heterocyclic antidepressant overdose. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:242–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Palaniswamy C, Selvaraj DR, Chugh T, et al. Brugada electrocardiographic pattern induced by amitriptyline overdose. Am J Ther 2010;17:529–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Roberts‐Thomson KC, Teo KS, Young GD. Drug‐induced Brugada syndrome with ST‐T wave alternans and long QT. Intern Med J 2007;37:199–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Rouleau F, Asfar P, Boulet S, et al. Transient ST segment elevation in right precordial leads induced by psychotropic drugs: Relationship to the Brugada syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12:61–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Goldgran‐Toledano D, Sideris G, Kevorkian JP. Overdose of cyclic antidepressants and the Brugada syndrome. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1591–1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Babaliaros VC, Hurst JW. Tricyclic antidepressants and the Brugada syndrome: An example of Brugada waves appearing after the administration of desipramine. Clin Cardiol 2002;25:395–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Chow BJ, Gollob M, Birnie D. Brugada syndrome precipitated by a tricyclic antidepressant. Heart 2005;91:651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sheikh M, Kanjwal K, Kasmani R, et al. Simultaneous ST‐segment elevation in inferior and precordial leads following ingestion of a lethal dose of desipramine: A novel Brugada‐like EKG pattern. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2010;28:35–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Tada H, Sticherling C, Oral H, Morady F. Brugada syndrome mimicked by tricyclic antidepressants overdose. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12:275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Pirotte MJ, Mueller JG, Poprawski T. A case report of Brugada‐type electrocardiographic changes in a patient taking lithium. Am J Emerg Med 2008;26:e1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Wright D, Salehian O. Brugada‐type electrocardiographic changes induced by long‐term lithium use. Circulation 2010;122:e418–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Phillips N, Priestley M, Denniss AR, et al. Brugada‐type electrocardiographic pattern induced by epidural bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 2003;97:264–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Vernooy K, Delhaas T, Cremer Ol, et al. Electrocardiographic changes predicting sudden death in propofol‐related infusion syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:131–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Riezzo I, Centini F, Neri M, et al. Brugada‐like EKG pattern and myocardial effects in a chronic propofol abuser. Clin Toxicol 2009;47:358–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Weiner JB, Haddad EV, Raj SR. Recovery following propofol‐associated Brugada electrocardiogram. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010;33:e39–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Littmann L, Monroe MH, Svenson RH. Brugada‐type electrocardiographic pattern induced by cocaine. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:845–849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Ortega‐Carnicer J, Bertos‐Polo J, Gutierrez‐Tirado C. Aborted sudden death, transient Brugada pattern, and wide QRS dysrrhythmias after massive cocaine ingestion. J Electrocariol 2001;34:345–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Robertson KE, Martin TN, Rae AP. Brugada‐pattern ECG and cardiac arrest in cocaine toxicity: Reading between the white lines. Heart 2010;96:643–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Chinushi M, Tagawa M, Izumi D, et al. Pilsicainide‐induced ST segment depression in two patients with variant forms of Brugada‐type electrocardiographic abnormalities. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009;32:811–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Paul G, Yusuf S, Sharma S. Unmasking of the Brugada syndrome phenotype during the acute phase of amiodarone infusion. Circulation 2006;114:e489–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Al Aloul B, Adabag AS, Houghland MA, et al. Brugada pattern electrocardiogram associated with supratherapeutic phenytoin levels and the risk of sudden death. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:713–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Stirnimann G, Severine P, Abriel H, et al. Brugada syndrome ECG provoked by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine. Europace 2010;12:282–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Sawhney V, Thomas G, Webster P, et al. Resolution of Brugada‐pattern ECG after withdrawal of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine. Heart 2010;96:1165–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Kiran HS, Ravikumar YS, Jayasheelan MR, et al. Brugada like pattern in ECG with drug overdose. J Assoc Physicians India 2010;58:120–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Meert A, Vermeersch N, Beckers R, et al. Brugada‐like ECG pattern induced by tricyclic antidepressants. Eur J Emerg Med 2010;17:325–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Copetti R, Proclemer A, Pillinini PP. Brugada‐like ECG abnormalities during thioridazine overdose. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005;59:608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Rollin A, Maury P, Guilbeau‐Frugier C, et al. Transient ST elevation after ketamine intoxication: A new cause of acquired Brugada ECG pattern. J Card Elect 2010;22:91–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Cole JB, Sattiraju S, Bilden EF, et al. Isolated Tramadol overdose associated with Brugada ECG pattern. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010. Oct 7 [E‐pub ahead of print], doi: 10.1111/j.1540–8159.2010.02924.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Sharma AN, Hexdall AH, Chang EK, et al. Diphenhydramine‐induced wide complex dysrthythmia responds to treatment with sodium bicarbonate. Am J Emerg Med 2003;21:212–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Levine M, Lovecchio F. Diphenhydramine‐induced Brugada pattern. Resuscitation 2010;81:503–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Lopez‐Barbeito B, Llis M, Delgado V, et al. Diphenhydramine overdose and Brugada sign. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:730–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Daccarett M, Freih M, Machado C. Acute cannabis intoxication mimicking Brugada‐like ST segment abnormalities. Int J Cardiol 2007;119:235–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Ansari E, Cook JR. Profound hypothermia mimicking a Brugada type ECG. J Electrocardiol 2003;36:257–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Bonnemeier H, Mauser W, Schunkert H. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Brugada‐like ECG pattern in severe hypothermia. Circulation 2008;118:977–978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Irani F, Kasmani R, Kanjwal Y. Hyperkalemia and cocaine induced dynamic Brugada‐type electrocardiogram. Eur J Emerg Med 2009;17:113–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Khalil Y, Siddique SM, Hoang NT. A Brugada‐pattern electrocardiogram and adrenal insufficiency. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:849–851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Kovacic JC, Kuchar DL. Brugada pattern electrocardiographic changes associated with profound electrolyte disturbance. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:1020–1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Kurisu S, Inoue I, Kawagoe T. Brugada‐like electrocardiographic pattern due to hyperkalemia. Clin Cardiol 2009;32:E23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kutsuzawa D, Arimoto T, Watanabe T, et al. Persistent abnormal value of late potential in Brugada syndrome associated with hypokalemia. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2011;16:104–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Mehta S, Parameswaran AC, Greenspan A, et al. Hypercalcemia due to rhabdomyolysis mimicking Brugada syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009;32:e14–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Mok N, Tong C, Yuen H. Concomitant‐acquired long QT and Brugada syndromes associated with indapamide‐induced hypokalemia and hyponatremia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008;31:772–775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Ortega‐Carnicer J, Benezet J, Ruiz‐Lorenzo F, et al. Transient Brugada‐type electrocardiographic abnormalities in renal failure reversed by dialysis. Resuscitation 2002;55:215–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Ortega‐Carnicer J, Benezet J, Calderon‐Jimenez P, et al. Hypothermia‐induced Brugada‐like electrocardiogram pattern. J Electrocardiol 2008;41:690–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Tamene A, Sattiraju S, Wang K, et al. Brugada‐like electrocardiography pattern induced by severe hyponatraemia. Europace 2010;12:905–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Tanawuttiwat T, Harindhanavudhi T, Bhan A, et al. Hyperkalemia‐induced Brugada pattern: An unusual manifestation. J Cardiovasc Med 2010;11:285–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Tsai CF, Wu DJ, Lin MC, et al. A Brugada‐pattern electrocardiogram and thyrotoxic periodic paralysis. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:848–849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Kataoka H. Electrocardiographic patterns of the Brugada Syndrome in 2 young patients with pectus excavatum. J Electrocardiol 2002;35:169–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Nakazato Y, Ohmura T, Shimada I, et al. Brugada‐like precordial ST elevation on ECG by anterior mediastinal infective mass lesion. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2003;3:184. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Sasaki A, Nakazato Y. Brugada‐like electrocardiogram detected after reconstructive operation for oesophageal cancer. Europace 2010;12:1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Tarin N, Farre J, Rubio JM, et al. Brugada‐like electrocardiographic pattern in a patient with a mediastinal tumor. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999;22:1264–1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Tomcsanyi J, Simor T, Papp L. Haemopericardium and Brugada‐like ECG pattern in rheumatoid arthritis. Heart 2002;87:234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Eggebrecht H, Wieneke H, Erbel R. Image of the month. Brugada‐like ECG pattern in a patient with isolated right ventricular infarction. Herz 2009;34:327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Nakazato Y, Kurata T, Yamaguchi H. ST segment elevation in the precordial leads mimicking Brugada syndrome. Heart 2000;83:216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Itoh E, Suzuki K, Tanabe Y. A case of vasospastic angina presenting Brugada‐type ECG abnormalities. Jpn Circ J 1999;63:493–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Tomcsanyi J, Zsoldos A, Bozsik B. Brugada‐like acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2003;89:1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Bramos D, Koutras K, Kollias G, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis and Brugada‐like ECG pattern. Int J Cardiol 2009;145:249–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Kim YH, Lim HE, Kim SH, et al. Brugada‐like ST‐segment abnormalities associated with myocardial involvement of hematologic diseases. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008;31:761–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Nayyar S, Nair M. Brugada pattern in toxic myocarditis due to severe aluminum phosphide poisoning. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009;32:e16–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Brito MR, Miranda CES, Rabelo W, et al. Type 1 electrocardiographic Brugada pattern in a woman with Chagas disease: A case report. Europace 2010;12:1345–1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Ozeke O, Selcuk MT, Topaloglu S, et al. Brugada‐like early repolarisation pattern associated with acute pericarditis. EMJ 2006;23:e64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Rudnik‐Schoneborn S, Schaupp M, Lindner A, et al. Brugada‐like cardiac disease in myotonic dystrophy type 2: Report of two unrelated patients. Eur J Neurol 2010;18:191–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Kaiser E, Pastore CA, Moffa PJ. Ebstein's anomaly with Brugada‐like electrocardiogram pattern: a critical view. Cardiology 2010;17:415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Rangaraj R, Moorthy N, Patil SS, et al. Brugada‐type electrocardiographic pattern induced by electrocution. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2009;9:56–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Littmann L, Monoroe MH, Taylor L III, et al. The hyperkalemic Brugada sign. J Electrocardiol 2007;40:53–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the Brugada syndrome and other mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis associated with ST‐Segment elevation. Circulation 1999;100:1660–1666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Antzelevitch C. The Brugada syndrome. Diagnostic criteria and cellular mechanisms. Eur Heart J 2001;22:356–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Nishida K, Fujiki A, Mizumaki K, et al. Canine model of Brugada syndrome using regional epicardial cooling of the right ventricular outflow tract. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004;15:936–941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Baranchuk A, Rosas F, Morillo CA. Enfermedad de Chagas en países desarrollados: mito o realidad (Chagas’ disease in developed countries: myth or reality) In Rosas F, Vanegas D, Cabrales M. (eds): Enfermedad de Chagas, Bogotá, Sociedad Colombiana de Cardiología. Bogota, Colombia, Sociedad Española de Cardiologia, 2007, pp. 217–219. [Google Scholar]
- 108. Chiale PA, Przybylski J, Laiño RA, et al. Electrocardiographic changes evoked by ajmaline in chronic Chagas’ disease without manifest myocarditis. Am J Cardiol 1982;49:14–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Takagi M, Aihara N, Kuribayashi S, et al. Localized right ventricular morphological abnormalities detected by electron‐beam computed tomography represent arrhythmogenic substrates in patients with the Brugada syndrome. Eur Heart J 2001;22:1032–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Wahbi K, Fressart V, Bécane HM, et al. High prevalence of Brugada syndrome in patients with Steinert's disease. Medgen 2009;21:423. [Google Scholar]
- 111. Teijeiro R, Garro HA, Acunzo RS, et al. Recording of high V1‐V3 precordial leads may be essential to the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome during the ajmaline test. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2006;11:153–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]