Abstract
Background
Atypical right bundle branch block (RBBB) may present with an rS pattern and notched S wave in lead V1. The notched S wave may represent slowed conduction or delayed activation of the right ventricular conduction system or ventricular myocardium.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the QRS patterns in accessory right precordial leads (from V3R to V5R) in 15 adults/senior individuals with notched S wave in lead V1.
Results
In the right accessory precordial leads, 13 showed triphasic QRS pattern with final R′ wave in their QRS complexes. This QRS pattern in association with notched S wave in lead V1 is suggestive of the presence of RBBB (incomplete or complete).
Conclusions
A notched S wave in lead V1 and in the right precordial accessory leads associated with a final R′ wave suggests the possibility of concealed RBBB (incomplete or complete).
Keywords: notched S wave in V1, right bundle branch block, right precordial accessory leads
INTRODUCTION
A notched S wave in lead V1 and other leads signifies conduction delay (depolarization phenomena) and is observed in several structural heart diseases, such as myocardial infarction, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D), and other cardiomyopathies.1, 2, 3
Right bundle branch block (RBBB) may present an rS pattern with notched S wave in lead V1 (atypical RBBB).4 However, RBBB is often seen in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and as a transient phenomenon in acute pulmonary embolism (APE).5, 6, 7 In the context of ACS, the presence of new RBBB provides prognostic information.7 In the presence of massive APE, the transient appearance of incomplete (IRBBB) or complete (CRBBB) RBBB is caused by right ventricular strain and a conduction delay in the stretched myocardium or the peripheral conduction system. Right ventricular strain is diagnosed in the presence of one or more of the following electrocardiogram (ECG) findings: complete or incomplete RBBB, S1Q3T3, and negative T wave in V1‐V4. The right ventricular strain pattern on the ECG is associated with adverse short‐term outcome and adds incremental prognostic value to echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with APE and normal blood pressure.8 In the general population, CRBBB is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and all‐cause mortality.9 Therefore, it is important to identify RBBB from cases with notched S wave in lead V1. Genuine IRBBB may be present in the absence of structural heart disease. A triphasic rSr′ and a narrow (between 90 and 110 ms) QRS complex in the absence of true IRBBB is eventually recorded particularly in lead V1 when a precordial electrode is placed higher than or to the right of the standard position. In these cases the duration of the final r′ wave is less than 20 ms.10 This pseudo IRBBB pattern is frequent in children, adolescents, and young adults (<40 years of age), asthenic habitus, underweight body mass index, and in subject with skeletal abnormalities with a decrease in the anteroposterior diameter of the chest (pectus excavatum and straight back syndrome).
In most subjects exhibiting this pattern, the right bundle branch does not appear to be involved in any pathological processes. When the QRS duration is normal, the rSr′ pattern in the right precordial leads is most often normal, and the terminal deflection represents normal terminal depolarization of the crista supraventricularis, proximal septum, and base of the heart.11
We retrospectively searched for ECGs from subjects with a notched S wave in lead V1, in whom leads V3R to V5R had been recorded. The aim of this study is to present the findings in leads V3R to V5R in these subjects.
METHODS
From January 2009 to February 2013, 15 subjects (9 men) from the Shiyan Taihe Hospital were included in the study. Their ECG showed a notched S wave in lead V1 and leads V3R to V5R were recorded.
We used the following criteria for CRBBB:12
QRS duration ≥120 ms.
Right precordial leads (V3R, V1, V2) with rsr′, rSR′, or rsR′ patterns and occasionally a wide and notched R wave.
Prolonged ventricular activation time “R peak time” in V1 ≥ 50 ms and normal in V5‐V6.
QR or Qr pattern in lead aVR with wide final R wave followed by a negative T wave.
Widened final S waves (≥40 ms) in the leads exploring the left ventricle: I, aVL, V5, and V6.
Ventricular repolarization (ST/T) with opposite direction to the terminal deflection of the QRS complex, consequently, a negative T wave with ST depression may be seen in V1 and sometimes in V2.
IRBBB is a somewhat ambiguous term due to the wide variation observed in QRS configuration and duration as well as the numerous clinical conditions. In the present manuscript we considered IRBBB criteria to be fulfilled when QRS duration was between 100 and 110 ms (<120 ms) in this adult and senior's series, because when the QRS duration is ≤100 ms, the IRBBB pattern is difficult to distinguish from that of normal variant. The morphological criteria were the same as for CRBBB. Additionally, we included patients with these previous characteristics and rS pattern in lead V1, when there was a notched S wave and the QRS duration was ≥100 ms and <120 ms.
Exclusion Criteria
We considered as exclusion criteria all the clinical‐biotypological and electrocardiographic characteristics with potential to simulate IRBBB or CRBBB.
-
Clinical biotype
Children, adolescents, and young adults (<40 years of age).
Asthenic habitus.
Body mass index <18.5 kg/m2.
Subjects with skeletal abnormalities with decrease in the anteroposterior diameter of the chest (pectus excavatum and straight back syndrome).
-
Electrocardiographic
QRS duration < 100 ms;
Presence of Tapia and Proudfit criteria:13 amplitude of initial r < 0.8 mV, amplitude of r′ < 0.06 mV, R/S ratio < 1.0, because the presence of these criteria suggest normality in conduction (normal variant).
RESULTS
The ECGs of subjects 1–10 and 12–15 are presented in Figures 1 and 2, and subject 11 is separately presented in Figure 3. Demographic and clinical data of the subjects included are listed in Table 1. In none of the subjects 1–10 and 12–15, criteria for CRBBB or IRBBB were fulfilled in leads V1 or V2. The criteria for triphasic rsr′, rSR′, or rsR′ patterns in V1‐V2 for CRBBB were fulfilled in leads V3R to V5R, but not in the standard 12 leads, in subjects 1 and 10. Our criteria for IRBBB were fulfilled in all of the V3R to V5R leads in subjects 4, 7, and 15, in leads V4R to V5R in subjects 5, 8, and 13, in lead V3R in subject 3 (the only right chest lead recorded) and in lead V5R in subjects 2, 12, and 14. In subjects 6 and 9, also the V3R to V5R leads showed notched S wave, but not CRBBB or IRBBB. In subject 1 there was accompanying left anterior fascicular block (LAFB). Subjects 3, 4, and 5 had an S wave in lead I, a Q wave and inverted T wave in lead III as a consequence of right ventricular strain causing S1Q3T3‐pattern according to the McGinn‐White criteria.14
Figure 1.

Standard 12 leads electrocardiograms of subjects 1–10 and 12–15 with notched S wave in lead V1.
Figure 2.

Lead V1 and accessory right precordial leads (V3R to V5R) of subjects 1–10 and 12–15 with notched S wave in lead V1.
Figure 3.

Electrocardiograms of case 11 with notched S wave in lead V1.
Table 1.
Demographic and Clinical Data of Included Subjects
| Age | Abnormal Parameters | Leads with IRBBB | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | (years) | Sex | Diagnosis | on Echocardiography | or CRBBB |
| 1 | 68 | M | Old anterior MI, CHF | LAD 35 mm, LVEDD 59 mm, anterior septal and apical hypokinesia, RVEDD 30 mm, RVSP 35 mmHg, LVEF 48% | V3R, V4R, V5R |
| 2 | 58 | F | None | Normal heart structure | V5R |
| 3 | 56 | F | APE | RVEDD 35 mm, RVSP 38 mmHg | V3R |
| 4 | 42 | F | APE | RVEDD 38 mm, RVSP 40 mmHg | V3R, V4R, V5R |
| 5 | 58 | F | APE | RVEDD 40 mm, RVSP 45 mmHg | V4R, V5R |
| 6 | 54 | M | APE | RVEDD 42 mm, RVSP 30 mmHg | None, notched S wave |
| 7 | 63 | M | HTN | LAD 32 mm, LVEDD 52 mm, RVSP 32 mmHg | V3R, V4R, V5R |
| 8 | 42 | M | HTN, CRF | LAD 32 mm, LVEDD 52 mm, RVSP 32 mmHg | V4R, V5R |
| 9 | 52 | M | CAD, old MI | LAD 35 mm | None, notched S wave |
| 10 | 46 | M | None | Normal heart structure | V3R, V4R, V5R |
| 11 | 78 | M | HTN, CAD, CHF | LAD 38 mm, LVEDD 58 mm, RVEDD 34 mm, RVSP 45 mmHg | V3R, V4R, V5R |
| 12 | 59 | F | HTN | LAD 33 mm | V5R |
| 13 | 55 | M | COPD | Normal heart structure | V4R, V5R |
| 14 | 57 | F | APE | RAD 44 mm, RVEDD 34 mm, RVSP 83 mmHg | V5R |
| 15 | 62 | M | HTN | LAD 34 mm | V3R, V4R, V5R |
IRBBB = incomplete right bundle branch block; CRBBB = complete right bundle branch block; MI = myocardial infarction; APE = acute pulmonary embolism; CRF = chronic renal failure; CAD = coronary artery disease; CHF = chronic heart failure; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LAD = left atrial diameter; LVEDD = left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter; RVEDD = right ventricular end‐diastolic diameter; RVSP = right ventricular systolic pressure; LVEF = left ventricle ejection fraction; RAD = right atrial diameter; HTN = hypertension.
Subject 11 was a 78‐year‐old male with coronary artery disease, hypertension, and chronic heart failure. The ECG showed a notched S wave in lead V1, while leads V3R to V5R revealed IRBBB (QRS duration 100 ms) in beats 1 and 3, while IRBBB (QRS duration 110 ms) was evident in leads V1 and V3R to V5R in beats of 2 and 4 (Fig. 2A). In the same ECG recording (Fig. 2B), IRBBB (QRS duration 110 ms) was evident in lead V1 in beats 1, 2, and 4, while beat 3 shows a wider QRS duration (130 ms) after an atrial premature beat indicating CRBBB, possibly related to aberrant conduction.
DISCUSSION
In this small series of subjects with notched S wave in lead V1, a terminal R′ wave in the right precordial accessory leads was a frequent finding, suggesting the possibility of hidden RBBB (incomplete or complete).
Camerini and Davies10 studied 50 subjects with an age range of 10–75 years without symptoms of cardiovascular or pulmonary disease. They found secondary R waves in 84% of the subjects in one or more of the V3R to V5R leads. Accordingly, they considered secondary R waves as a normal finding in accessory right chest leads when the QRS duration was less than 100 ms. In our adult (and senior) series, only 3 out of 15 had no known cardiovascular disease or APE.
The left anterior superior fascicle is adjacent to the right bundle branch. LAFB and RBBB thus commonly coexist. Newly acquired RBBB with concomitant LAFB in patients with acute myocardial infarction are frequently caused by occlusion of left main coronary artery or proximal left anterior descending artery before the first septal perforator branch and may portend a poor prognosis.5, 7,15 Sometimes LAFB may partially conceal the diagnosis of RBBB causing absence of characteristic final S waves of RBBB in left leads I, aVL, and in some cases in V5‐V6. The absence of final S waves in I and aVL and left precordial leads is called standard and precordial masquerading RBBB, respectively.16, 17 This phenomenon occurs in the presence of concomitant high degree of LAFB associated with RBBB, left ventricular hypertrophy and/or left ventricular free wall LV focal block caused by myocardial fibrosis or necrosis. LAFB may eventually obscure the characteristic triphasic QRS pattern of RBBB in the right precordial leads; in such cases the RBBB is totally missed.16 In cases of intermittent LAFB, the dromotropic disturbance can conceal the pattern of RBBB in the right precordial leads. LAFB can not only obscure the diagnosis of RBBB, but may also conceal high voltage associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in the left precordial leads. Additionally, the secondary T‐wave changes induced by LAFB in the inferior leads and from V3 to V6 reverse the deep negative T waves. Our subject 1 is an example of a notched S wave in lead V1 in CRBBB. The so‐called precordial “masquerading” RBBB is usually found in the context of high‐degree LAFB with concomitant severe left ventricular enlargement and/or fibrotic block in the anterolateral wall of the left ventricle, and also signifies the presence of a severe underlying heart disease.17 However, the ECG findings in our subject 10 seems to indicate that the precordial “masquerading” RBBB can also be found in the general population and may present as notched S wave in lead V1.
Subjects 3 to 6 and 14 were all diagnosed with APE. Possibly IRBBB was uncovered by recording leads V3R to V5R in subjects 3, 4, 5, and 14, while only notched S wave was found in subject 6. These findings seem to indicate that notched S wave in lead V1 is a common phenomenon in APE, although there may be different underlying mechanisms.6 IRBBB revealed by leads V3R to V5R in subjects 3, 4, 5, and 14 associated with APE, probably results from right ventricular strain, because they had elevated right ventricular systolic pressure (see Table 1).
The normal terminal activation of the QRS complex in lead V1 in RBBB is directed to the right and anteriorly. The QRS complex configuration in RBBB may be influenced by the position of the ventricular septum, the size and possible structural disease in the ventricles, the position of the recording electrode, the insertion point of the right bundle branch, the degree of RBBB, etc. If the terminal portion of the QRS complex in RBBB is directed more posteriorly, RBBB may present a notched S wave in lead V1, while the typical bundle branch pattern is evident from leads V3R to V5R.
According to Schamroth et al.,4 a diminution of the S‐wave amplitude in lead V2 reflects the early development of RBBB. Further progression leads to slurring or notching of the upstroke of the S wave in lead V2, followed by the development of an R′ deflection. With further progression, the R′ deflection becomes increasingly taller until the advent of CRBBB, which is characterized by a very tall R′ deflection. In another study by Smith and Ray,18 progression in the severity of pulmonary arterial obstruction in patients with APE is closely correlated with the appearance of a notched S wave and R/S ratio regression, followed by the RSR′ pattern and, finally, by CRBBB in the right precordial leads. We found three different measures of QRS duration indicating IRBBB or CRBBB in one of our subjects (#11). With the increase of QRS duration, the QRS morphology in lead V1 changed: first a notched S wave (QRS 100 ms), second an rSR′ pattern (QRS 110 ms) indicating IRBBB and finally a taller R′ wave (QRS 130 ms) indicating CRBBB. Our findings indicate that a notched S wave associated with narrow QRS duration (<120 ms) in lead V1 may be an early sign of future CRBBB.
It should be pointed out that the so‐called IRBBB based on QRS duration less than 120 ms and abnormal final R′ wave in the precordial accessory leads with rightward orientation is speculative, mainly because RBBB represents pathological changes in the right bundle branch, not only morphological changes in ECG.
LIMITATIONS
The following are limitations of our study: the retrospective nature of the collection of the data, the small number of patients included in the sample, and the inexistence of electrophysiological, histopathological, and vectorcardiographic confirmation of final conduction delay in the basal right ventricular territory.
CONCLUSIONS
The presence of a notched S wave in lead V1 associated with a final R′ wave in the right precordial accessory leads suggests the possibility of hidden RBBB (incomplete or complete). Our results suggests that a notched S wave in lead V1 is an indication to record accessory right chest leads (V3R to V5R) as they may provide clinically important information. Further studies are needed to verify the results.
All authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
REFERENCES
- 1. Carey MG, Luisi AJ Jr, Baldwa S, et al. The Selvester QRS Score is more accurate than Q waves and fragmented QRS complexes using the Mason‐Likar configuration in estimating infarct volume in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Electrocardiol 2010;43:318–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Marcus FI, Zareba W. The electrocardiogram in right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. How can the electrocardiogram assist in understanding the pathologic and functional changes of the heart in this disease? J Electrocardiol 2009;42:136.e1–136.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Das MK, Khan B, Jacob S, et al. Significance of a fragmented QRS complex versus a Q wave in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2006;113:2495–2501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Schamroth L, Myburgh DP, Schamroth CL. The early signs of right bundle branch block. Chest 1985;87:180–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Widimsky P, Rohác F, Stásek J, et al. Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: Should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy? Eur Heart J 2012;33:86–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kukla P, Długopolski R, Krupa E, et al. Electrocardiography and prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Cardiol J 2011;18:648–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Fiol M, Carrillo A, Rodríguez A, et al. Electrocardiographic changes of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction in patients with complete occlusion of the left main trunk without collateral circulation: Differential diagnosis and clinical considerations. J Electrocardiol 2012;45:487–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Vanni S, Polidori G, Vergara R, et al. Prognostic value of ECG among patients with acute pulmonary embolism and normal blood pressure. Am J Med 2009;122:257–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bussink BE, Holst AG, Jespersen L, et al. Right bundle branch block: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in the general population: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Heart J 2013;34:138–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Camerini F, Davies LG. Secondary R waves in right chest leads. Br Heart J 1955;17:28–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Chou's Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric, Sixth Edition, Chapter 5: Right Bundle Branch Block. Saunders Elsevier, 2008, pp. 95–107. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part III. Intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:976–981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Tapia FA, Proudfit WL, Secondary R waves in right precordial leads in normal persons and in patients with cardiac disease. Circulation 1960;21:28–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. McGinn S, White PD. Acute cor pulmonale resulting from pulmonary embolism. JAMA 1935;104:1473–1480. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhong‐qun Z. Two electrocardiographic patterns in patients with sudden complete occlusion of the left main trunk without collateral circulation. J Electrocardiol 2013;46:69–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Elizari MV, Acunzo RS, Ferreiro M. Hemiblocks revisited. Circulation 2007;115:1154–1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Elizari MV, Baranchuk A, Chiale PA. Masquerading bundle branch block: a variety of right bundle branch block with left anterior fascicular block. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2013;11:69–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Smith M, Ray CT. Electrocardiographic signs of early right ventricular enlargement in acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 1970;58:205–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
