Abstract
The selective activation of strong sp3 C–H bonds at mild conditions is a key step in many biological and synthetic transformations, and an unsolved challenge for synthetic chemists. In nature, soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) is one representative example of nonheme dinuclear iron-dependent enzymes that activate strong sp3 C–H bonds by a high-valent diiron(IV) intermediate Q. To date, synthetic model complexes of sMMO-Q have shown limited abilities to oxidize strong C–H bonds. In this work, we generated a high-valent CoIII,IV2(μ-O)2 complex 3 supported by a tetradentate TPA ligand via one-electron oxidation of its CoIII2(μ-O)2 precursor 2. Characterization of 2 and 3 using X-ray absorption spectroscopy and DFT calculations showed that both species possess a diamond core structure with a short Co•••Co distance of 2.78 Å. Furthermore, 3 is an EPR active species showing an S = 1/2 signal with clear hyperfine splittings originated from the coupling of the 59Co nuclear spin with the electronic spin. Importantly, 3 is a highly reactive oxidant for sp3 C–H bonds, and an oxygenation reagent. 3 has the highest rate constant (1.5 M−1 s−1 at −60 °C) for oxidizing 9,10-dihydroanthracene (DHA) compared to diamond core complexes of other first-row transition metals including Mn, Fe and Cu reported previously. Specifically, 3 is about 4–5 orders of magnitude more reactive than the diiron analogs FeIII,IV2(μ-O)2 and FeIV2(μ-O)2 supported by TPA and related ligands. These findings shed light on future development of more reactive approaches for C–H bond activation by bio-inspired dicobalt complexes.
Graphical Abstract

Introduction.
The activation of carbon-hydrogen (C–H) bonds is the first step of functionalizing inert hydrocarbons. This transformation is a key step in many biological and synthetic processes.1–7 Nature offers highly efficient and selective solutions for carrying out aliphatic C–H bond functionalization using metalloenzymes that employ earth-abundant transition metals such as iron and copper in the active sites.8 One representative example is soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO), a nonheme dinuclear iron-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the hydroxylation of the strong C–H bond of methane (bond dissociation energy BDE = 105 kcal/mol) using O2 as the oxidant.9–10 The catalytic cycle of sMMO has been extensively studied over decades, and features a high-valent bis-μ-oxo FeIV2(μ-O)2 “diamond core” intermediate called Q as the active oxidant for C–H bond activation. Spectroscopic characterization of sMMO-Q has revealed that the FeIV2(μ-O)2 diamond core has a short Fe•••Fe distance of 2.46 Å,11 with both Fe centers in a high spin (S = 2) state.12–13 Lipscomb and co-workers have further provided confirmative evidence using resonance Raman spectroscopy for the structural assignment of sMMO-Q.14 However, recent work by DeBeer et al. employing high-energy-resolution fluorescence detected X-ray absorption spectroscopy (HERFD XAS) argued that sMMO-Q possesses an open core structure with an Fe•••Fe distance of ~3.4 Å based on HERFD XAS data.15–16 On the other hand, synthetic high-valent model complexes of sMMO-Q have been reported. A number of dinuclear μ-oxo and bis-μ-oxo manganese,17–20 iron9,21–22 and copper23–24 complexes exhibited C–H bond cleavage and O–O bond formation activities. However, only one of them, a (μ-oxo)diiron(IV) complex supported by an anionic pentadentate N4O ligand, is capable of activating strong sp3 C–H bonds such as those in cyclohexane (BDE = 99.3 kcal/mol).21
In contrast, the high-valent diamond core chemistry of cobalt has been much less investigated, likely due to the difficulty of generating high-valent oxocobalt(IV) species for characterization.25–26 There is evidence showing that high-valent oxocobalt(IV) species are involved in a number of water oxidation27–28 and C–H bond cleavage reactions.29 To date, six CoIII2(μ-O)2 complexes supported by tridentate or bidentate ligands have been structurally characterized.30–35 However, no higher-valent derivative is available. In the present study, we report an unprecedented high-valent CoIII,IV2(μ-O)2 complex (3) supported by a tetradentate tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA) ligand (Scheme 1). This species can be generated by one-electron oxidation of its CoIII2(μ-O)2 precursor (2). Characterization of 3 using combined spectroscopic and computational approaches confirmed that it has a diamond core structure with a short Co•••Co distance of 2.78 Å. More importantly, 3 is highly reactive and activates C–H bonds at a rate constant that is 3–5 orders of magnitude higher than its diiron and dimanganese analogs measured at higher temperatures.
Scheme 1.
Schematic illustration for the synthesis of 2 and 3.
Results and discussion.
Generation and characterization of 2.
Instead of first making the dihydroxo-bridged dicobalt(II) precursor CoII2(μ-OH)2 described by Hikichi et al.,36 we hypothesized that the direct reaction of a mononuclear cobalt(II)-Cl species [(TPA)CoII-Cl]+ (1)37 with H2O2 in the presence of base could afford the diamond core complex [(TPA)CoIII(μ-O) CoIII(TPA)]2+2 (2) according to Eq.1.
| (1) |
Indeed, the reaction of 1 directly with 0.5 eq. H2O2 at −40 °C in the presence of 1 eq. tetrabutylammonium hydroxide as the base produced a new brown species 2 (Figure 1 red). 2 exhibits an intense absorption at 460 nm (ε = 4700 M−1 cm−1) and a weak shoulder at ~600 nm. No reaction was observed between 1 and H2O2 alone. The stoichiometry between 1, H2O2, and OH− was determined to be 2:1:2 by a titration experiment (Figure S1). The addition of excess H2O2 or OH− did not cause 2 to be formed in a higher yield. The formation of 2 could be carried out in a variety of solvents including acetonitrile (MeCN), methanol (MeOH) and dichloromethane (DCM). 2 is relatively stable at −40 °C and below (t1/2 = ~4 hours at −40 °C), and undergoes fast thermal decay at higher temperatures. Above −20 °C, 2 is formed at much reduced yields. 2 has a much lower thermal stability compared to the μ-hydroxo, μ −1,2-peroxo-bridged dicobalt(III) species of the same TPA ligand, whose single crystals can be obtained at room temperature.38–39 The optical features of 2 are distinct from those reported for CoIII2(μ-OH)2, CoIII (μ-OH)(μ-OO)CoIII and mononuclear cobalt(III)-peroxo species CoIII(O2).38,40–45 In contrast, the intensity of the 460 nm absorption resembles those of the CoIII2(μ-O)230–31,35 and NiIII2(μ-O)246–47 complexes reported previously, which was assigned to an oxo-to-metal charge transfer transition.
Figure 1.
Optical spectra of 1 (black), 2 (red) and 3 (blue) obtained in methanol at −60 °C. Inset: time trace of the absorption at 480 nm during the formation of 3.
The characterization of 2 using high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) shows a primary signal at m/z = 884.1755 (Figure S2). The mass and the isotope distribution pattern correspond to [CoIII2(TPA)2 (O)2 (CF3COO)(CH3CN)]+. When the formation of 2 was carried out using 18O labeled H2O2, the ESI-MS signal was observed at m/z 888.2312. This upshift of four mass units clearly indicates that the oxygen atoms from H2O2 are incorporated into the molecular formula of 2. Complex 2 is EPR silent, consistent with the assignment of two d6 Co(III) centers (Figure S3). In contrast, the mononuclear precursor 1 exhibited an EPR signal typical of d7 S = 3/2 Co(II).48–49 The lack of any residual Co(II) signal in the spectrum of 2 indicates that the conversion of 1 to 2 is complete. Furthermore, characterization of 2 using 1H NMR spectroscopy at −55 °C in methanol confirmed that 2 is a diamagnetic species (Figure S4). Interestingly, we observed two sets of signals assignable to pyridine aromatic protons with the integration ratio of 2:1. This is clear evidence that the three pyridines of each TPA ligand are in two different environments---likely two are trans- to each other and the third one is trans to a bridging oxo ligand, a pattern that resembles that of the CoIII2(μ-OH)2 species supported by the same TPA ligand.40 Quantification by integrating the aromatic proton signals using 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid (DSS) as the internal standard showed that the formation of 2 is quantitative (> 90%).
Generation and characterization of 3.
To obtain a high-valent derivative of 2, we employed a one-electron chemical oxidant CeIV (in the form of (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6, CAN).50 The introduction of 2-to 3-fold excess of CAN into the methanol solution of 2 at −60 °C and below afforded a new, transient species 3 with an intense absorption maximum at 480 nm (Figure 1 blue). 3 was formed from 2 within seconds (Figure 1, inset), much faster than the formation of 2 from 1 at −40 °C. 3 is less stable than 2 and decomposes even at −60 °C (t1/2 = ~90 s at −60 °C), indicating that 3 is likely a higher-valent species. Furthermore, 3 is much less stable than the superoxo-bridged dicobalt(III) species of the TPA ligand, which can be obtained by one-electron oxidation of the peroxo-dicobalt(III) precursor and characterized at room temperature.38–39 3 can be reduced back to 2 using ferrocene (Figure S5) and acetylferrocene (E = 0.27 V), but not diacetylferrocene (E = 0.49 V). The one-electron redox potential of 3 was thus estimated to fall in the range of 0.27–0.49 V vs. ferrocene.
3 is an EPR active species, showing a broad X-band (9.65 GHz) EPR signal at g = 2.13, 2.03 and 1.99 measured at 16 K, which is indicative of an S = 1/2 system (Figure 2 blue). The quantification of this S = 1/2 signal revealed that 3 was formed in a typical yield of ~70–80% from 2. Based on the EPR spin quantification, the molar extinction coefficient of the 480 nm band is estimated to be ~15,000 M−1 cm−1. We performed careful control experiments to exclude possible interference from CAN and its one-electron reduced species (both are EPR silent). Due to the broadness of this EPR signal, the hyperfine splitting originated from the coupling of the 59Co nuclear spin (I = 7/2, natural abundance 100%) with the electronic spin cannot be established by the X-band data. We further measured S-band (3.5 GHz) spectra on the sample containing 3, which clearly demonstrated the existence of 59Co hyperfine coupling (Figure 2 purple). The hyperfine splitting centered at g = 2.13 is consistent with a pattern involving two 59Co nuclei with almost identical A values having a magnitude ~70 MHz (Figure S6). A spectral simulation including two identical 59Co nuclei is the best solution to account for both X-band and S-band data (see Figure 3 for the simulation parameters, and Figures S6 and S7 for more discussions on the spectral simulations). The relatively small g anisotropy (gmax – gmin = 0.14) and the small A(59Co) tensor suggest that the spin density may not be predominantly localized on a single Co center. Similar observations have been reported for a [Co(III)3Co(IV)O4] species with a complete spin delocalization on the cluster.51 In addition, several reported μ-superoxo-dicobalt(III) species have also exhibited an broad S = 1/2 EPR signal at cryogenic temperatures similar to the one observed for 3.38–39,45,52–54 Interestingly, these μ-superoxo-dicobalt(III) species have much higher thermal stability than 3 that allows them to be characterized even at room temperature, under which their EPR spectra exhibit much better resolved hyperfine structures.39,55 Although EPR alone is unable to distinguish between bis-μ-oxo dicobalt(III,IV) and μ-superoxo-dicobalt(III) species, combined evidence obtained from X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, and oxygen exchange and C–H bond cleavage reactivities supports that 3 is a mixed-valent CoIII,IV2(μ-O)2 diamond core species having a spin-delocalized electronic ground state (vide infra).
Figure 2.
X-band (blue) and S-band (purple) EPR spectra of 3 recorded at 16 K. The spectra are aligned against g = 2 marker. The spectral simulations for the corresponding EPR signal are shown in black underneath the experimental spectra. The simulation parameters for 3 are g = [2.13, 2.02, 1.99], σg = [0.01, 0.008, 0.008], A(59Co) = [75, 35, 18] MHz, with Euler angle [α, β, γ] = [0, 20°, 0], line width = 0.7 mT. The measurement conditions: microwave frequency, 9.64 GHz (X-band) and 3.5 GHz (S-band); microwave power, 20 μW (X-band) and 300 μW (S-band); modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation amplitude, 1 mT (X-band) and 0.5 mT (S-band).
Figure 3.
(A) Normalized XANES spectra of 1 (solid line), 2 (dotted line) and 3 (dashed line). The inset depicts an expansion of the pre-edge. (B-C) Representative best fits (bolded entries in Tables S1 and S2) to k3-weighted EXAFS data of 2 (panel B), and 3 (panel C). Experimental data is shown as a dotted line, while the best fit is shown as a solid line.
Characterization of 2 and 3 by XAS.
In light of the thermal instability of both 2 and 3 precluding the growth of suitable single crystals for X-ray crystallography, we turned to cobalt K-edge XAS on frozen solution samples of 2 and 3 for insights into their geometric and electronic structures. To provide further evidence for the progressive oxidation of 1 to 2 and 3, we first evaluated their cobalt K-edge X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES) properties. The XANES spectrum of 2 shows a significant blue shift relative to that of 1, as evidenced by a +0.9 eV shift of pre-edge energy, and +2.8 eV shift for edge energy (Table 1, Figures 3A and S8), indicating an increase of the Co oxidation state in 2 relative to 1. Further, after correcting for the yield in the frozen solution samples of 3 (based on quantification of its EPR signal) by normalizing the spectrum after taking a scaled difference of 2 from 3, the edge energy of 3 is blue-shifted by ~+0.6 eV compared to that of 2 (7720.2 eV for 2 and 7720.8 eV for 3; see Table 1, Figures 3A and S9) while the pre-edge peak energy (7710.2 eV for both) is invariant (Figure S8). This is consistent with a partial increase of Zeff from 2 to 3. We note that a small blue shift of the edge energy, without any change in pre-edge peak energy, was similarly observed for Co4O4 clusters.56–57 The pre-edge area of the 7710.2 eV feature is 6.7(2) and 9.0(4) units for 2 and 3, respectively. There is an additional pre-edge feature at ~7713 eV that gains intensity upon oxidation of 2 (1.7 units) to 3 (5.9 units). The weak intensities of the 1s→3d pre-edge features of complexes 2 and 3 are consistent with Oh symmetry.58–60 For octahedral low-spin Co(III) centers, the only allowed excited electron configuration is (t2g)6(eg)1, producing a Eg state.57–58 This is responsible for the pre-edge feature at 7710 eV for complex 2. The pre-edge spectrum of mixed-valent complex 3 is expected to be an average of those of its spectroscopically resolved low-spin cobalt(III) and cobalt(IV) centers, as the XAS core-hole lifetime is orders of magnitude shorter than the intramolecular electron transfer rates for class III mixed valent complexes.57–58,61 For octahedral low-spin Co(IV) centers, the pre-edge peak originates from 1T1, 3T1, and 1T2 excited states of the (t2g)5 (eg)1 electron configuration;57–58 a transition to the 1A1 excited state from the (t2g)6(eg)0 electron configuration is expected to produce a lower-energy shoulder, which is not well resolved in the XANES spectrum of complex 3 with mixed-valent Co(III)(μ-O)2Co(IV) core. There is a shoulder on the rising edge at ~7713 eV that gains intensity upon oxidation of 2 (1.7 units) to 3 (5.9 units). Similar features at a relative position of 3~5 eV above the pre-edge peak were observed in K3[Fe(III)(CN)6] (octahedral low-spin d5 system),61 K3[Co(III)(CN)6] (octahedral low-spin d6 system),60 several Co(III)-peroxo complexes supported by macrocyclic N4 ligands (distorted octahedral low-spin d6 system),62 and cobalt(III) intermediates of B12 enzymes and model compounds supported by dimethylglyoxime ligands with various axial donors (distorted octahedral low-spin d6 system with or without Co–C bonds);59 these features were attributed to charge transfer transitions into predominantly ligand-based orbitals and/or 1s-to-4p transitions with shakedown contributions. Such features were also reported for MCoO2 (M = Li, Ag, Eu, and La)63 and Co4O4 cubanes,57 and were assigned to transitions to orbitals with significant M/M coupling interactions mediated by the oxo bridges.64 In addition, the 3T2 transition of the excited (t2g)5(eg)1 electron configuration for the Co(IV) center of complex 3 could also contribute to the broad 7713 eV feature.57–58
Table 1.
Summary of spectroscopic parameters for cobalt species 1, 2 and 3.
| Complex | λmax, nm (ε, M−1 cm−1) | Spin State | g1, g2, g3 | Pre-edge peak | Rising-edge shoulder | Edge energy (eV) | Co•••Co (Å) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E (eV) | Area | E (eV) | Area | ||||||
| 1 | 490 (250) 615 (150) |
3/2 | 7.13, 3.03, 2.06a | 7709.3(1) | 10.7(4) | 7713.9(2) | 10.1(15) | 7717.4 | NA |
| 2 | 460 (4,700) | 0 | NA | 7710.2(1) | 6.7(2) | 7713.1(1) | 1.7(5) | 7720.2 | 2.78d 2.784e |
| 3 | 480 (15,000) | 1/2 | 2.14, 2.02, 1.98 | 7710.2(1) | 8.4(3)b 9.0(4)c |
7713.4(1) | 4.9(16)b 5.9(19)c |
7720.5b 7720.8c |
2.78d 2.769e |
effect g values from ms = +/− 1/2 levels of an S = 3/2 spin state.
from fittings of the raw data. Pre-edge areas are multiplied by100 for convenience.
from fittings after correction for the formation yield determined by EPR of the corresponding species.
from EXAFS analysis.
from geometry optimized calculation.
Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) characterization of 2 and 3 provided further structural insights. The k3χ(k) EXAFS of 2 and 3 have highly analogous oscillation patterns, which is mirrored by the very similar appearance of the EXAFS Fourier transforms for these two species (Figures 3B, C). Both observations suggest that the coordination environment around the cobalt centers does not alter appreciably upon the oxidation of 2 to 3. Indeed, the first coordination shell of 2 and 3 are both best fit by 5 N/O scatterers surrounding the cobalt center at an average distance of 1.91–1.92 Å, accounting for nitrogen donors from the TPA ligand as well as oxo donors. Attempts to split this shell into two subshells of NTPA and Ooxo donors yielded poorer quality fits, as evidenced by higher reduced χ2 and R-factor values. As shown in the DFT geometry-optimized structures (vide infra), the NTPA and Ooxo subshells are separated by less than the EXAFS resolution of 0.13 Å for our k range of 2.0–14.0 Å−1. Therefore, the shorter Ooxo sub-shell is not resolved from the NTPA scatterers.
The second coordination sphere for both complexes is best modeled with a combination of long range carbon scatterers and a Co•••Co vector, with the best structural solution for both complexes (i.e. Fit 17 for 2 in Table S1 and Fit 18 for 3 in Table S2) including a cobalt scatterer at a short distance of 2.78 Å away from the absorbing cobalt. Fits excluding this cobalt scatterer and comprising only first-shell N/O scatterers and one or two shells of second sphere C atoms yielded sizably worsened fit quality. The improvement of fit quality by introducing the cobalt scatterer is also observed in the Fourier transform spectrum (Figures S10 and S11). Such a short Co•••Co distance has previously been reported for the crystal structures of CoIII2(μ-O)2 complexes (2.67–2.74 Å)30–35 and other high-valent M2(μ-O)2 complexes with a diamond-core structure (Table S3), and is also confirmed in our DFT geometry optimization (vide infra). Notably for both complexes, we did not observe significant features at path-lengths longer than 3 Å in the Fourier transform characteristic of peroxo-bridged core structures such as CoIII(μ-OH)(μ-OO)CoIII and CuII(μ-η2:η2(O2))CuII where the M•••M separation is significantly longer (Table S3). Taken together, the characterizations of 2 and 3 by EXAFS support their structural assignment as the Co2(μ-O)2 diamond core complexes.
DFT calculations of 2 and 3.
We then turned to DFT optimization of the structures of 2 and 3 (Figures S12 and 4, respectively; also see Table S4) to substantiate our spectroscopic observations. Geometry optimization at the BP86/6–31G(D) level provided low-spin ground states for 2 and 3, i.e. singlet and doublet, respectively. For each species calculated, an optimized structure with a symmetric Co2(μ-O)2 diamond core and coordinatively saturated cobalt centers was successfully obtained. Two structural isomers differing in the relative position of two tertiary amine nitrogen atoms (i.e. cis- vs. trans-, see Figures 4, S12 and Scheme S1) were optimized. For both 2 and 3, the trans model was found to be 31.1 kJ/mol and 27.4 kJ/mol lower in energy than the cis-model, respectively. In addition to symmetric Co2(μ-O)2 structures, we also optimized open-core and asymmetric Co2(μ-O)2 structures (Scheme S1). However, all of these alternative structures of 2 and 3 are energetically less stable than the symmetric trans-Co2(μ-O)2 counterparts. Notably, spin density on the two Co atoms was distributed equally in complex 3 (Figures 5 and S13, Table S5), which implies that 3 is a valence-delocalized system in agreement with the simulation of the EPR data. The Co•••Co distances in the DFT-optimized trans structure of 2 and 3 are 2.78 Å and 2.77 Å, respectively, consistent with those determined by EXAFS analysis (Table 1). Furthermore, the average distances of Co–NTPA/Ooxo bonds for the trans structures of complexes 2 and 3 are 1.92 Ǻ and 1.91 Ǻ (Table S6), respectively, in excellent agreement with EXAFS analysis for the first coordination shell. The average distances of Co–Ooxo bonds of DFT geometry optimized trans structures 2 and 3 are 1.86 Ǻ and 1.83 Ǻ, respectively. These Co–Ooxo distances are consistent with those of several Co4O4 cubane complexes with six-coordinated cobalt sites (values are from X-ray crystallography and DFT calculations),57,65 and are slightly longer than those of diamond core Co2O2 crystal structures with cobalt centers of lower coordination numbers (1.78–1.83 Ǻ).30–35 Furthermore, these geometry-optimized structures clearly showed that the six pyridines are in two distinct local environments with a ratio of 2:1, which is experimentally observed in our 1H NMR results obtained for 2 (vide supra, Figure S4). Similar results were obtained using other commonly used DFT functionals M06-L, B3LYP* (15% HF), and B3LYP (Table S7).
Figure 4.
BP86/6–31G(D) optimized symmetric diamond core structures for 3 in the trans- (panel A) and cis- (panel B) configuration. Cobalt: pink, oxygen: red, nitrogen: blue, carbon: gray, hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
Figure 5.
Spin density plot of 3 [BP86/6–31G(D)+PCM(CH3OH)].
C–H bond cleavage reactivity of 3.
With the spectroscopic characterization of the mixed-valent CoIII,IV2(μ-O)2 diamond core 3 in hand, we sought to investigate its ability to cleave aliphatic C–H bonds. Similar reactivity has yet to be described for superoxo-bridged dicobalt(III) species. We first selected 9,10-dihydroanthracene (DHA, BDE = 78 kcal/mol) as a diagnostic substrate. As shown in Figure S14, the introduction of 8 mM DHA into a freshly prepared solution of 3 at −60 °C in 2:1 methanol/DCM mixed-solvent caused the complete disappearance of its absorption maximum at 480 nm within less than 2 minutes. The kinetic trace could be well fitted using a first-order model to obtain the pseudo-first-order rate constant (kobs) of 0.019 s−1. Furthermore, the second-order rate constant k2 of 1.5(1) M−1 s−1 for DHA oxidation could be extracted from the slope of a linear correlation between kobs and the substrate concentration. When deuterated DHA-d4 was used as the substrate, a slower reaction with k2 = 0.25(1) M−1 s−1 was observed, yielding a H/D kinetic isotope effect (KIE) of 6.0 (Figure S15). The large KIE value indicates that the cleavage of an aliphatic C–H bond of DHA by 3 through hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) is the rate-determining step. We further measured the DHA oxidation rate constants in a temperature range of −55 °C to −70 °C, and obtained the activation parameters (ΔH≠ = 9.0(1) kcal/mol and ΔS≠ = −14.8(2) cal/(mol ● K)) by Eyring analysis (Figure S16). The small activation energy is consistent with the fast rate of DHA oxidation even at cryogenic temperatures.
Quantification of the oxidation product(s) of DHA by GC-MS indicated the formation of primarily anthraquinone (19% yield) and trace amount of anthrone and anthracene, accounting for ~80% of the oxidizing equivalents used (Table S8). We carried out careful control experiments to exclude possible interference from the excess amount of CAN present in the reaction solution. This observation shows that 3 is a two-electron oxidant. Furthermore, the yield of anthraquinone is independent of the amount of O2 present in the reaction solution, suggesting that anthraquinone is not the product of a radical auto oxidation by O2. No ligand oxidation product was found, presumably due to geometric constraints of the ligand backbone and the unlikehood of the intermolecular process between two oxidant molecules. After the reaction, a new cobalt species that is distinct from 2 was formed (Figure S12). Given that 3 is a two-electron oxidant, we hypothesized that this new species is a dicobalt(II,III) complex. The characterization of this species will be described elsewhere.
We investigated the reaction of 3 with other hydrocarbons whose C–H bond strength varies in a range of 78–87 kcal/mol. As anticipated, the k2 value decreases as the C–H bond being cleaved becomes stronger (Figure S17). The benzylic C–H bond of ethylbenzene (BDE = 87 kcal/mol) is the strongest one that 3 can cleave, with a rate of 0.025(2) M−1 s−1 at −60 °C. Product analysis showed the formation of acetophenone as the only product at the yield of 15%, accounting for ~43% (after correcting for the formation yield of 3) of the oxidizing equivalents available for 3. The oxidizing equivalents unaccounted for may be due to the self-decay of 3, which has first-order rate constant of ~0.008 s−1. Furthermore, a H/D KIE of 8.8 and 7.8 was determined for the oxidation of fluorene and ethylbenzene (Figures S18 and S19), respectively, clearly indicating that 3 cleaves the C–H bond of these substrates via a HAT process. For this group of substrates studied, the logarithm of k2’ (k2’ = k2/number of equivalent hydrogen), when normalized on a per hydrogen basis, correlated linearly with the strength of the C–H bond being cleaved with a slope of −0.17 (Figure 6). The analysis of product formation for these substrates showed that ketone was the primary product (Table S7). In some cases alcohol and desaturated products were also formed but in much smaller yields.
Figure 6.
Plot of log k2’ as a function of the C–H bond strength for substrate oxidation by 3 in methanol at −60 °C (red), FeIII,IV2(μ-O)2 with 1 M H2O at −30 °C (black) and CuIII2(μ-O)2 at −70 °C (blue). The lines represent the best linear fittings.
3 is thus an oxygenation reagent for C–H bonds. The rate-determining HAT process from the substrate likely generates a CoIII2(μ-O)(μ-OH) species and a carbon centered radical. The rebound of the hydroxyl group back to the carbon radical then yields the hydroxylated C–OH product (Scheme 2). The over-oxidation of the alcohol product must occur by another molecule of 3 to generate the ketone product observed in product analysis. Our observation that the product distribution and yield are independent of the presence of O2 in the reaction media indicates that the rebound of the hydroxyl group to the carbon radical must be fast so that the carbon radical does not escape from the radical cage to be trapped by O2.
Scheme 2.
Proposed mechanism for C–H bond oxygenation by complex 3.
We further studied the exchange kinetics of the oxo ligands in complexes 2 and 3 with added H218O in methanol at −60 °C in order to understand this fundamental reactivity of bis-μ-oxo complexes.66–67 In these experiments, H218O was either added to the solution of 2, allowing oxygen exchange to occur for a period of incubation time followed by rapid conversion of 2 to 3, or introduced directly to the solution of 3 for oxygen exchange. The addition of water does not affect the formation yield of 3. We then employed ethylbenzene as a substrate probe to react with 3, and monitored the incorporation of 18O isotope in the oxidation product acetophenone by GC-MS. Complex 2 has sufficient lifetime at −60 °C that allows us to vary the incubation time up to 4 hours after the addition of H218O. In contrast, complex 3 is too short-lived for a similar set of incubation time dependence studies.
As shown in Figure 7A, the incorporation of 18O isotope in acetophenone was found to be 17% when 0.3 M H218O was added to the solution of 2 without any incubation time. The fraction of 18O acetophenone increases when increasing the incubation time of the solution of 2 after the same amount of H218O was added (Figure 7A), up to 35% at the maximum tested incubation time of 4 hours. This slight dependence of the 18O incorporation as a function of the incubation time indicates that oxygen exchange on complex 2 is in fact slow (within hours), consistent with the kinetic inertness of low-spin Co(III) centers.68 Furthermore, the fraction of 18O acetophenone increases as a function of the concentration of H218O added to the solution of 2 with a fixed incubation time (2 hours, Figure 7B). At the maximum H218O concentration tested (3 M, almost the saturation concentration in methanol at −60 °C), we observed ~50% 18O incorporation in acetophenone. In addition, we performed a set of control experiments by adding H218O directly to the solution of 3 followed by immediate ethylbenzene oxidation (without any incubation time). For the two H218O concentrations tested (red data points in Figure 7B), comparable 18O acetophenone contents were obtained compared to the set of studies in which H218O was added to complex 2 with a 2-hour incubation time (black data points in Figure 7B). This observation suggests that oxygen exchange proceeds much faster on 3 than on 2.
Figure 7.
Plots of the 18O incorporation percentage in acetophenone as a function of (A) incubation time after 0.3 M H 218O was added to 3 mM 2, and (B) the concentration of H 218O introduced to either 3 mM 2 with a 2-hour incubation time (black squares) or 3 mM 3 with no incubation time (red squares). Other conditions: in methanol at −60 °C.
These data thus provide strong support for the structural assignment of 2 and 3 as having the bis-μ-oxo diamond cores, since the oxygen exchange of H218O with peroxo- and superoxo-bridged dinuclear species is highly unlikely. Furthermore, the incorporation of 18O isotope into the reaction product of ethylbenzene is a clear demonstration that the oxygen in acetophenone is from the diamond core complex 3. This observation is consistent with the rebound mechanism (Scheme 2) proposed for C–H bond oxygenation reactions.
Our results clearly revealed that the CoIII,IV2(μ-O)2 diamond core 3 is a highly reactive oxidant towards C–H bonds. The BDE plots shown in Figure 6 comparing C–H bond cleavage reactivities of 3 with FeIII,IV2(μ-O)2 (in the presence of 1 M H2O)22 and CuIII2(μ-O)2 (in an equilibrium with a CuII2(μ-η2:η2-O2) species)23 showed that 3 is up to two orders of magnitude more reactive than the other two diamond core species. The slope of the linear fitting for 3 (−0.17) is less steep than those of FeIII,IV2(μ-O)2 and CuIII2(μ-O)2 species (~−0.3), indicating that the rate constants of 3 are less sensitive to the C–H bond strength of the substrates than the other two species.
Specifically, 3 has the highest reaction rate for DHA oxidation (1.5 M−1 s−1 at −60 °C) compared to diamond core complexes of other first-row transition metals including Mn,17 Fe69 and Cu23 reported previously at a variety of temperatures (see also Table S9 and references therein). 3 is about 3 orders of magnitude more reactive than the di-manganese species MnIII,IV2(μ-O)2 (1.2 × 10−3 M−1 s−1 at 32 °C),17 and is about 4–5 orders of magnitude more reactive than the diiron analogs FeIII,IV2(μ-O)2 and FeIV2 (μ-O)2 supported by TPA and related ligands (10−4–10−5 M−1 s−1 at −30 °C).69 Furthermore, 3 oxidizes ethylbenzene at a rate of 0.025(2) M−1 s−1 at −60 °C, which is about two orders of magnitude faster than that of FeIII,IV2(μ-O)2 at −30 °C in the presence of 1 M H2O (2 × 10−4 M−1 s−1).22 Surprisingly, the redox potential of 3 (0.27–0.49 V) is comparable or even lower than those of these two high-valent diiron counterparts.69 Therefore, other factors such as the pKa of the bridging oxo ligands and the activation energy of cleaving a C–H bond likely contribute to the high reactivity of 3. On the other hand, 3 is unable to cleave C–H bonds stronger than 87 kcal/mol. This thermodynamic limit likely reflects the strength of the CoIIIO–H bond formed after the HAT step. Our ongoing investigations aim to measure these thermodynamic values in order to better understand the reactivity of 3.
In addition, the DHA oxidation rate of 3 is at least 7-fold higher than those measured at higher temperatures of two mononuclear oxocobalt(IV) species recently described.25–26 In fact, the DHA oxidation rate is only about one order of magnitude slower than the one measured for the open core species HO-FeIII-O-FeIV=O (28 M−1 s−1).70 It is thus conceivable that further development of this high-valent dicobalt-oxo system could lead to the generation of even more reactive species for sp3 C–H bond activation.
Conclusion.
In conclusion, we have generated an unprecedented high-valent dicobalt(III,IV) complex CoIII,IV2(μ-O)2 3 by one-electron oxidation of its CoIII2(μ-O)2 precursor 2. Characterization of 3 by spectroscopic and computational methods including EPR, XAS and DFT revealed that 3 has an S =1/2 ground state and a bis-μ-oxo diamond core structure (preferably in a trans configuration) with a short Co•••Co distance. The bridging oxo ligands of 3 are exchangeable with H218O. 3 is able to cleave C–H bonds having bond strength up to 87 kcal/mol, affording fast kinetic rate constants and the oxygenated products. These features (spectroscopy, stability and reactivity) are distinct from those of the peroxo- and superoxo-bridged dicobalt(III) complexes supported by the same TPA ligand recently reported by other groups.38–39 Interestingly, the rate constant for DHA oxidation by 3 is 4–5 orders of magnitude higher than those determined for the diiron analogs, despite the fact that 3 has a moderate redox potential that is comparable to those of the diiron species. These interesting findings shed light on better understanding of the high-valent diamond core chemistry for cobalt and inspire future development of more effective approaches for C–H bond activation by bio-inspired dicobalt complexes.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Support of this work was provided by the Center for Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics CoBRE (Grant NIGMS P20GM103546) and the University of Montana (Y.L. and D.W.). F.L., M.R.T. and S.H. are supported by New Mexico State University start-up funding. Y.G. acknowledges the support from NSF (CHE-1654060). We thank Mr. Ruixi Fan at CMU for assisting with EPR measurements. E.R.F. was supported by NIH P30-EB-009998. Use of beamline 7-3 at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory) was made possible by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 and support of the SSRL Structural Molecular Biology Program by the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research as well as the NIH. The computational studies were supported by the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), project number TG-CHE170004.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
Experimental methods, computational details, Figures S1–S19, Table S1–S22, Scheme S1.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
REFERENCES
- (1).Yang X; Wu T; Phipps RJ; Toste FD Advances in Catalytic Enantioselective Fluorination, Mono-, Di-, and Trifluoromethylation, and Trifluoromethylthiolation Reactions. Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 826–870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Furuya T; Kamlet AS; Ritter T Catalysis for Fluorination and Trifluoromethylation. Nature 2011, 473, 470–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Purser S; Moore PR; Swallow S; Gouverneur V Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev 2008, 37, 320–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Miller PW; Long NJ; Vilar R; Gee AD Synthesis of 11C, 18F, 15O, and 13N Radiolabels for Positron Emission Tomography. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2008, 47, 8998–9033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Ametamey SM; Honer M; Schubiger PA Molecular Imaging with PET. Chem. Rev 2008, 108, 1501–1516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Brase S; Gil C; Knepper K; Zimmermann V Organic Azides: An Exploding Diversity of a Unique Class of Compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2005, 44, 5188–5240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Thirumurugan P; Matosiuk D; Jozwiak K Click Chemistry for Drug Development and Diverse Chemical-Biology Applications. Chem. Rev 2013, 113, 4905–4979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Huang X; Groves JT Beyond Ferryl-mediated Hydroxylation: 40 Years of the Rebound Mechanism and C–H Activation. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 2017, 22, 185–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Jasniewski AJ; Que L Jr. Dioxygen Activation by Non-heme Diiron Enzymes: Diverse Dioxygen Adducts, High-Valent Intermediates, and Related Model Complexes. Chem. Rev 2018, 118, 2554–2592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Wallar BJ; Lipscomb JD Dioxygen Activation by Enzymes Containing Binuclear Non-Heme Iron Clusters. Chem. Rev 1996, 96, 2625–2657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Shu L; Nesheim JC; Kauffmann K; Münck E; Lipscomb JD; Que L Jr. An FeIV2O2 Diamond Core Structure for the Key Intermediate Q of Methane Monooxygenase. Science 1997, 275, 515–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Liu KE; Wang D; Huynh BH; Edmondson DE; Salifoglou A; Lippard SJ Spectroscopic Detection of Intermediates in the Reaction of Dioxygen with the Reduced Methane Monooxygenase Hydroxylase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 7465–7466. [Google Scholar]
- (13).Lee S-K; Fox BG; Froland WA; Lipscomb JD; Münck E A Transient Intermediate of the Methane Monooxygenase Catalytic Cycle Containing an FeIVFeIV Cluster. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1993, 115, 6450–6451. [Google Scholar]
- (14).Banerjee R; Proshlyakov Y; Lipscomb JD; Proshlyakov DA Structure of the Key Species in the Enzymatic Oxidation of Methane to Methanol. Nature 2015, 518, 431–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Castillo RG; Banerjee R; Allpress CJ; Rohde GT; Bill E; Que L Jr.; Lipscomb JD; DeBeer S High-Energy-Resolution Fluorescence-Detected X-ray Absorption of the Q Intermediate of Soluble Methane Monooxygenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 18024–18033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Cutsail GE III.; Banerjee R; Zhou A; Que L Jr.; Lipscomb JD; DeBeer S. High-Resolution Extended X‑ray Absorption Fine Structure Analysis Provides Evidence for a Longer Fe···Fe Distance in the Q Intermediate of Methane Monooxygenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 16807–16820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Larsen AS; Wang K; Lockwood MA; Rice GL; Won T-J; Lovell S; Sadılek M; Turecek F; Mayer JM Hydrocarbon Oxidation by Bis-μ-oxo Manganese Dimers: Electron Transfer, Hydride Transfer, and Hydrogen Atom Transfer Mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2002, 124, 10112–10123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Wang K; Mayer JM Oxidation of Hydrocarbons by [(phen)2Mn(μ-O)2Mn(phen)2]3+ via Hydrogen Atom Abstraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1997, 119, 1470–1471. [Google Scholar]
- (19).Das S; Incarvito CD; Crabtree RH; Brudvig GW Molecular Recognition in the Selective Oxygenation of Saturated C–H Bonds by a Dimanganese Catalyst. Science 2006, 312, 1941–1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Young KJ; Brennan BJ; Tagore R; Brudvig GW Photosynthetic Water Oxidation: Insights from Manganese Model Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res 2015, 48, 567–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Wang D; Farquhar ER; Stubna A; Münck E; Que L Jr. A Diiron(IV) Complex that Cleaves Strong C–H and O–H Bonds. Nat. Chem 2009, 1, 145–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Xue G; Pokutsa A; Que L Jr. Substrate-Triggered Activation of a Synthetic [Fe2(μ-O)2] Diamond Core for C–H Bond Cleavage. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 16657–16667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Matsumoto T; Ohkubo K; Honda K; Yazawa A; Furutachi H; Fujinami S; Fukuzumi S; Suzuki M Aliphatic C–H Bond Activation Initiated by a (μ-η2:η2-Peroxo)dicopper(II) Complex in Comparison with Cumylperoxyl Radical. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009. 131, 9258–9267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Elwell CE; Gagnon NL; Neisen BD; Dhar D; Spaeth AD; Yee GM; Tolman WB Copper-Oxygen Complexes Revisited: Structures, Spectroscopy, and Reactivity. Chem. Rev 2017, 117 2059–2107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Wang B; Lee Y-M; Tcho W-Y; Tussupbayev S; Kim S-T; Kim Y; Seo MS; Cho K-B; Dede Y; Keegan BC; Ogura T; Kim SH; Ohta T; Baik M-H; Ray K; Shearer J; Nam W Synthesis and Reactivity of a Mononuclear Non-haem Cobalt(IV)-oxo Complex. Nat. Commun 2017, 8, 14839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Hong S; Pfaff FF; Kwon E; Wang Y; Seo M-S; Bill E; Ray K; Nam W Spectroscopic Capture and Reactivity of a Low-Spin Cobalt(IV)-Oxo Complex Stabilized by Binding Redox-Inactive Metal Ions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 10403–10407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Surendranath Y; Kanan MW; Nocera DG Mechanistic Studies of the Oxygen Evolution Reaction by a Cobalt-phosphate Catalyst at Neutral pH. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 16501–16509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Nguyen AI; Ziegler MS; Oña-Burgos P; Sturzbecher-Hohne M; Kim W; Bellone DE; Tilley TD Mechanistic Investigations of Water Oxidation by a Molecular Cobalt Oxide Analogue: Evidence for a Highly Oxidized Intermediate and Exclusive Terminal Oxo Participation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 12865–12872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Ray K; Heims F; Pfaff FF Terminal Oxo and Imido Transition-Metal Complexes of Groups 9–11. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem 2013, 3784–3807. [Google Scholar]
- (30).Hikichi S; Yoshizawa M; Sasakura Y; Komatsuzaki H; Moro-oka Y; Akita M Structural Characterization and Intramolecular Aliphatic C-H Oxidation Ability of MIII(μ-O)2 MIII Complexes of Ni and Co with the Hydrotris-(3,5-dialkyl-4-X-pyrazolyl)borate Ligands TpMe2,X (X = Me, H, Br) and TpiPr2. Chem. Eur. J 2001, 7, 5011–5028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Larsen PL; Parolin TJ; Powell DR; Hendrich MP; Borovik AS Hydrogen Bonds around M(μ-O)2M Rhombs: Stabilizing a {CoIII(μ-O)2CoIII} Complex at Room Temperature. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2003, 42, 85–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Dai X; Kapoor P; Warren TH [Me2NN]Co(η6-toluene): O=O, N=N, and O=N Bond Cleavage Provides β-Diketiminato Cobalt μ-Oxo and Imido Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 4798–4799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Zhao P; Lei H; Ni C; Guo J-D; Kamali S; Fettinger JC; Grandjean F; Long GJ; Nagase S; Power PP Quasi-Three-Coordinate Iron and Cobalt Terphenoxide Complexes {AriPr8OM(μ-O)}2 (AriPr8 = C6H‑2,6-(C6H2‑2,4,6‑iPr3)2‑3,5‑iPr2; M = Fe or Co) with M(III)2(μ-O)2 Core Structures and the Peroxide Dimer of 2‑Oxepinoxy Relevant to Benzene Oxidation. Inorg. Chem 2015, 54, 8914–8922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).DeRosha DE; Mercado BQ; Lukat-Rodgers G; Rodgers KR; Holland PL Enhancement of C–H Oxidizing Ability in Co–O2 Complexes through an Isolated Heterobimetallic Oxo Intermediate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 3211–3215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Engelmann X; Yao S; Farquhar ER; Szilvμsi T; Kuhlmann U; Hildebrandt P; Driess M; Ray K A New Domain of Reactivity for High-Valent Dinuclear [M(μ-O)2M’] Complexes in Oxidation Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 297–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Hikichi S; Yoshizawa M; Sasakura Y; Akita M; Moro-oka Y First Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Dinuclear M(III) Bis(μ-oxo) Complexes of Nickel and Cobalt with Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate Ligand. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1998, 120, 10567–10568. [Google Scholar]
- (37).Chan SL-F; Lam TL; Yang C; Lai J; Cao B; Zhou Z; Zhu Q Cobalt(II) Tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine Complexes [Co(TPA)X]+ Bearing Coordinating Anion (X = Cl, Br, I and NCS): Synthesis and Application for Carbon Dioxide Reduction. Polyhedron 2017, 125, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
- (38).Wang H-Y; Mijangos E; Ott S; Thapper A Water Oxidation Catalyzed by a Dinuclear Cobalt–Polypyridine Complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 14499–14502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Kotani H; Hong D; Satonaka K; Ishizuka T; Kojima T Mechanistic Insight into Dioxygen Evolution from Diastereomeric m-Peroxo Dinuclear Co(III) Complexes Based on Stoichiometric Electron-Transfer Oxidation. Inorg. Chem 2019, 58, 3676–3682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Ishizuka T; Watanabe A; Kotani H; Hong D; Satonaka K; Wada T; Shiota Y; Yoshizawa K; Ohara K; Yamaguchi K; Kato S; Fukuzumi S; Kojima T Homogeneous Photocatalytic Water Oxidation with a Dinuclear CoIII–Pyridylmethylamine Complex. Inorg. Chem 2016, 55, 1154–1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Meloon DR; Harris GM Preparation, Structure, and Interconversion Kinetics of Mono- and Binuclear Aquo(nitrilotriacetato)cobaltate(III) Complexes. Inorg. Chem 1977, 16, 434–437. [Google Scholar]
- (42).Cho J; Sarangi R; Kang HY; Lee JY; Kubo M; Ogura T; Solomon EI; Nam W Synthesis, Structural, and Spectroscopic Characterization and Reactivities of Mononuclear Cobalt(III)-Peroxo Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 16977–16986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Hu X; Castro-Rodriguez I; Meyer K Dioxygen Activation by a Low-Valent Cobalt Complex Employing a Flexible Tripodal N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligand. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 13464–13473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Rahman AFMM; Jackson WG; Willis AC The First Sideways-Bonded Peroxo Complex for a Tetraaminecobalt(III) Species. Inorg. Chem 2004, 43, 7558–7560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Rigsby ML; Mandal S; Nam W; Spencer LC; Llobet A; Stahl SS Cobalt Analogs of Ru-based Water Oxidation Catalysts: Overcoming Thermodynamic Instability and Kinetic Lability to Achieve Electrocatalytic O2 Evolution. Chem. Sci 2012, 3, 3058–3062. [Google Scholar]
- (46).Shiren K; Ogo S; Fujinami S; Hayashi H; Suzuki M; Uehara A; Watanabe Y; Moro-oka Y Synthesis, Structures, and Properties of Bis(μ-oxo)nickel(III) and Bis(μ-superoxo)nickel(II) Complexes: An Unusual Conversion of a NiIII2(μ-O)2 Core into a NiII2(μ-OO)2 Core by H2O2 and Oxygenation of Ligand. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2000, 122, 254–262. [Google Scholar]
- (47).Itoh S; Bandoh H; Nakagawa M; Nagatomo S; Kitagawa T; Karlin KD; Fukuzumi S Formation, Characterization, and Reactivity of Bis(μ-oxo)dinickel(III) Complexes Supported by A Series of Bis[2-(2-pyridyl)ethyl]amine Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2001, 123, 11168–11178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).McAlpin JG; Surendranath Y; Dinca M; Stich TA; Stoian SA; Casey WH; Nocera DG; Britt RD EPR Evidence for Co(IV) Species Produced During Water Oxidation at Neutral pH. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 6882–6883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Wang D; Groves JT Efficient Water Oxidation Catalyzed by Homogeneous Cationic Cobalt Porphyrins: Critical Roles for the Buffer Base. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 15579–15584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Connelly NG; Geiger WE Chemical Redox Agents for Organometallic Chemistry. Chem. Rev 1996, 96, 877–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).McAlpin JG; Stich TA; Ohlin CA; Surendranath Y; Nocera DG; Casey WH; Britt RD Electronic Structure Description of a [Co(III)3Co(IV)O4] Cluster: A Model for the Paramagnetic Intermediate in Cobalt-Catalyzed Water Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 15444–15452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Cho YI; Joseph DM; Rose MJ “Criss-Crossed” Dinucleating Behavior of an N4 Schiff Base Ligand: Formation of a μ‑OH,μ‑O2 Dicobalt(III) Core via O2 Activation. Inorg. Chem 2013, 52, 13298–13300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Stich TA; McAlpin JG; Wall RM; Rigsby ML; Britt RD Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Characterization of Dioxygen-Bridged Cobalt Dimers with Relevance to Water Oxidation. Inorg. Chem 2016, 55, 12728–12736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Sykes AG; Well JA In Progress in Inorganic Chemistry; Edwards, J. O, Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- (55).Schrauzer GN; Lee LP Cobaloximes(II) and Vitamin B12r as Oxygen Carriers. Evidence for Monomeric and Dimeric Peroxides and Superoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1970, 92, 1551–1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (56).Brodsky CN; Hadt RG; Hayes D; Reinhart BJ; Li N; Chen LX; Nocera DG In situ Characterization of Cofacial Co(IV) Centers in Co4O4 Cubane: Modeling the High-valent Active Site in Oxygen-evolving Catalysts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3855–3860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Hadt RG; Hayes D; Brodsky CN; Ullman AM; Casa DM; Upton MH; Nocera DG; Chen LX X‐ray Spectroscopic Characterization of Co(IV) and Metal–Metal Interactions in Co4O4: Electronic Structure Contributions to the Formation of High-Valent States Relevant to the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 11017–11030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).Westre TE; Kennepohl P; DeWitt JG; Hedman B; Hodgson KO; Solomon EI A Multiplet Analysis of Fe K-Edge 1s -> 3d Pre-Edge Features of Iron Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1997, 119, 6297–6314. [Google Scholar]
- (59).Chance MR In Chemistry and Biochemistry of B12; Banerjee R.; Wiley: New York, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- (60).Sano M XANES Study at the Co K Absorption Edge in a Series of Cobalt(III) Complexes. Inorg. Chem 1988, 27, 4249–4253. [Google Scholar]
- (61).DeBeer George S; Petrenko T; Neese F Prediction of Iron K-Edge Absorption Spectra Using Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 12936–12943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (62).Sarangi R; Cho J; Nam W; Solomon EI XAS and DFT Investigation of Mononuclear Cobalt(III) Peroxo Complexes: Electronic Control of the Geometric Structure in CoO2 versus NiO2 Systems. Inorg. Chem 2011, 50, 614–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (63).de Groot FMF; Vankó G; Glatzel P The 1s X-ray Absorption Pre-edge Structures in Transition Metal Oxides. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21, 104207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (64).Vankó G; de Groot FMF; Huotari S; Cava RJ; Lorenz T; Reuther M Intersite 4p-3d Hybridization in Cobalt Oxides: A Resonant x-Ray Emission Spectroscopy Study. ArXiv.org e-Print Arch., Condens. Matter 2008, arXiv:082.2744v2741.[cond-mat.strel]. [Google Scholar]
- (65).Chakrabarty R; Bora SJ; Das BK Synthesis, Structure, Spectral and Electrochemical Properties, and Catalytic Use of Cobalt(III)-Oxo Cubane Clusters. Inorg. Chem 2007, 46, 9450–9462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (66).Tagore R; Crabtree RH; Brudvig GW Distinct Mechanisms of Bridging-Oxo Exchange in Di-μ-O Dimanganese Complexes with and without Water-Binding Sites: Implications for Water Binding in the O2-Evolving Complex of Photosystem II. Inorg. Chem 2007, 46, 2193–2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (67).Tagore R; Chen H; Crabtree RH; Brudvig GW Determination of μ-Oxo Exchange Rates in Di-μ-Oxo Dimanganese Complexes by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128, 9457–9465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (68).Lippard SJ; Berg JM In Principles of Bioinorganic Chemistry; University Science Books: Mill Valley, California, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- (69).Xue G; Wang D; De Hont R; Fiedler AT; Shan X; Münck E; Que L Jr. A Synthetic Precedent for the [FeIV2(μ-O)2] Diamond Core Proposed for Methane Monooxygenase Intermediate Q. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20713–20718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (70).Xue G; Hont RD; Münck E; Que L Jr. Million-fold Activation of the [Fe2(μ-O)2] Diamond Core for C–H Bond Cleavage. Nat. Chem 2010, 2, 400–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









