Abstract
Using MDA-MB-231 cells as a model of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its metastatic sub-cell lines that preferentially metastasize to lung, bone or brain, we found that the mRNA and protein levels of fibronectin (FN) are increased in MDA-MB-231 cells and its lung metastatic derivative, when cultivated in three-dimensional (3D) suspension cultures. The increase of FN expression in 3D was dependent on p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) because it was prevented by treatment of cells with SB203580, an inhibitor of p38MAPK. The up-regulated FN was converted into fibrils, and it enhanced cell spreading when cells cultured in 3D were transferred to two-dimensional (2D) culture. The arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) peptides and siRNAs targeting of integrin β-5 inhibited spreading of cells regardless of the presence of FN on 2D culture dishes. In addition, the levels of phosphorylated Src were found to be increased in 3D and the treatment of cells with SU6656, an inhibitor of Src, decreased the rate of cell spreading on FN. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that increased cellular FN in 3D suspension culture facilitates cancer cell attachment and spreading via integrin β-5 and Src, suggesting that the increased FN promotes initial attachment of cancer cells to secondary organs after circulation during metastasis.
Subject terms: Breast cancer, Extracellular matrix
Introduction
Although conventional 2D culture systems have provided many insights into cell biology and therapeutic treatment of cancer, the development of new culture systems to better mimic in vivo situations provides additional insights into cancer cell behavior. Comprehensive and systematic studies have illuminated distinctively different gene expression and signaling cascades profiles between cells cultured in 2D and in 3D cell culture systems and it is thought that 3D culture better reflects the physiological behavior of cells1–4.
Cells grown in 3D culture exhibit adaptive characteristics to the environment, different from those of cells grown in 2D culture. When cells are cultured on 2D surfaces, cells display large focal adhesions in which more than 100 different proteins including integrins can assemble and communicate bi-directionally with extracellular matrix (ECM)5. Thus, cells adhered on 2D surfaces induce intracellular signaling through focal adhesions. In addition, signals from inside cells can determine migration speed, persistence, and directionality by influences on focal adhesion dynamics. In contrast to cells cultured in 2D, cells grown in 3D soft matrix possess smaller focal adhesions that diffuse not only in the basal part, but also across the surface of the cells6,7. To efficiently negotiate in 3D conditions, the cell using protrusive dynamic rather than regulating the size of focal adhesion binds to, moves on, and releases the accessible ECM fibrils surrounding the cell.
As cancer progression develops, tumor cells undergo metastasis which consists of multiple steps including invasion through tissues via penetration of the basement membrane, intravasation to the circulatory system to move through the blood or lymph, and extravasation from the circulation system, followed by colonization in the second organ as a new niche8. During this process, tumor cells in the circulatory system inevitably remain detached from the scaffolding structures of tissue. The environment of the circulatory system is unfavorable for circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to be viable and to initiate metastasis, since the CTCs can be attacked by immune cells and Reactive Oxygen Species, and large focal adhesions providing appropriate survival signal are absent in them9. Nonetheless, some cancer cells survive in the vascular system and successfully metastasize to secondary organs.
Triple negative breast cancer is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer characterized by lack of expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) and accounts for more than 10% of all breast cancers10,11. Because the majority of TNBC cells do not possess a specific target, it is relatively difficult to find an effectively available treatment, and generally has an adverse prognosis with a high risk of recurrence and metastasis and resistance to conventional therapy. MDA-MB-231 cells, a model TNBC cell line, were injected into immunodeficient mice, and the cells showing organ-specific metastasis to lung, bone, or brain were classified12,13. Through the in vivo study of microarray and functional genomics, a number of genes mediating lung metastasis of MDA-MB-231 cells were identified.
In the present study, we used 2D and 3D culture systems to study cellular behaviors that might facilitate metastasis. We identified that FN is highly up-regulated in MDA-MB-231 (herein referred to as parental) and its lung metastatic derivative (herein referred to as LM2), but not in bone and brain metastatic derivatives, when they are specifically cultured in 3D suspension condition. Considering that FN, which is a marker of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and a crucial component of ECM, is not expressed in normal adult breast tissues and its expression is up-regulated during breast cancer development14,15, we investigated the role of increased cellular FN in 3D suspension cultures when cells encounter 2D surfaces. We found that increased cellular expression of FN in 3D conditions facilitates cancer cell attachment and spreading via integrin β-5 and Src, suggesting that increased FN promotes initial attachment of cancer cells to secondary organ after circulation during metastasis.
Results
Fibronectin expression is increased in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-231 LM2 in 3D suspension culture
To investigate changes induced by different culture conditions, a TNBC cell line, MDA-MB-231 cells (herein referred to as parental) and its derivatives that prefer to metastasize to lung (LM2), bone (BoM2), or brain (BrM2) were cultured in 3D ultra-low attachment plates or 2D plates for 48 hours. Interestingly, in 3D suspension culture, all four cell lines spontaneously formed floating cell spheroids that did not die, despite losing the contact surface. To identify changed expressions in EMT marker proteins between cells cultured in 2D versus 3D conditions, western blot analysis was performed using lysates of cells grown under each condition (Fig. S1A). Whereas parental and LM2 cells exhibited increases of FN expression in 3D suspension cultures, BoM2 and BrM2 did not show detectable changes in FN expression (Fig. 1A). In addition, MCF7, a non-metastatic breast tumor cell line, were examined for the change in FN expression according to culture condition. And the results showed that there was not a significant difference of fibronectin between MCF7 cells cultured in 2D and in 3D (Fig. S1B).
To determine if the increased FN proteins of parental and LM2 cells were from transcription of FN1 gene, we conducted polymerase chain reaction with messenger RNAs (mRNAs) extracted from the two kinds of cells and it was found that both cells produced markedly increased amounts of mRNAs as well as proteins in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 1B,C). Additionally, in order to determine if the increase in the expression changes of FN is reversible, we transferred parental and LM2 cells to 2D culture dishes after incubating them in 3D for 48 hours. In both cell lines, the amounts of proteins and mRNAs of FN gradually decreased with the passage of time (Fig. 1D,E). Taken together, we concluded that FN expression in parental and LM2 cells is up-regulated only when the cells are cultured in 3D suspension condition.
The relation between fibronectin and breast cancer based on gene-set analysis
With the results of up-regulation of FN in 3D culture, we analyzed the expression of FN in different breast cancer subtypes taking advantages of GOBO online tool (http://co.bmc.lu.se/gobo/)16. Interestingly, 101 cases displaying highly expressed FN in tumor tissue show a decreased pattern of distant metastasis free 5-years survival (DMSF) rate among 320 ER-negative breast cancer samples (Fig. 1F). When the data is analyzed depending on cell types, it revealed that a significantly higher expression of FN is identified in the basal B cancer cell group17, which is a group containing TNBC and that TNBC cell lines showed higher mean of FN expression compared to HER2-positive and/or hormone receptor-positive cell lines (Fig. 1G,H). The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer dataset was additionally analyzed, using UCSC cancer genomic browser (http://genome-cancer.ucsc.edu/)18 (Fig. S2). We identified that about 120 samples were classified as TNBCs among 1247 breast cancer tissues samples, and approximately 15~20% of them exhibited high expression of FN even though its expression pattern is not generally distinguished as a specific characteristic.
These results from two different data analysis tools based on Gene Expression Omnibus public repositories and TCGA dataset, respectively, are complementary for the result of our in vitro experiments that only parental and LM2 cells showed highly up-regulated FN in 3D although all 4 cell lines exhibited low levels of FN expression on 2D culture dishes. Furthermore, these results might be one explanation for highly expressed FN in only some TNBC patients.
Fibronectin expression is regulated by p38 MAP kinase in 3D
It was reported in a previous study that FN in MDA-MB-231 cells is increased by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling via p38MAPK pathway, and p38MAPK is involved in the regulation of gene transcription and translation19,20. Based on this information, we investigated the role of p38 MAPK on FN expression in 3D suspension culture. Although TGF-β signaling is not active, it was found that the phosphorylation level of p38MAPK was increased in 3D suspension culture (Fig. 2A). Also, MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MAPKAPK2), a downstream protein regulated by p38 MAPK showed increased phosphorylation when cells were cultured in 3D suspension condition21 (Fig. 2A). To identify the influence of p38 MAPK on FN synthesis, MDA-MB-231 parental and LM2 cells cultured in 3D were treated with the p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB203580. Decreased expression of FN in both cell lines was observed in a dose-dependent manner in cells treated with SB203580, while the formation of cell spheroids was hardly affected by SB203580 at 10 μM (Figs. 2B,C and S3).
The increased availability of fibronectin in 3D suspension culture facilitates fibrillogenesis and cell spreading when cells attach on 2D surface
Cellular FN that is synthesized by cells and secreted into the interstitial space of tissues first exists as a soluble dimer and undergoes fibrillogenesis to be formed as ECM fibril22–24. Thus, we investigated whether FN present inside cells and the interstitial space of cell spheres serves as a component of ECM after being converted to fibrils when cells encounter 2D surfaces. To separate the FN assembled into high molecular weight fibrils, the cells were spread onto 2D culture dishes after incubation for 48 hours in 2D attached or 3D suspended state, and cell lysates were harvested using deoxycholate (DOC) by which fibrillated FN is insoluble25. While the cells transferred from 2D to 2D did not accumulate DOC-insoluble FNs after being transferred, more DOC-insoluble FNs were detected in the pellet of from-3D-to-2D samples in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 3A).
To determine the role of cellular FN in 3D culture, two different kinds of siRNAs targeting FN gene (FN1) were used to knock-down the mRNA of FN1 (Fig. 3B). When comparing FN1 siRNA transfected cells with non-targeting siRNA control group, it was observed that knocking-down of FN reduces secreted ECM FN on the surface of culture glasses (Fig. 3D). Also, in both cell lines, loss of FN led to decreased spreading of cell bodies for two hours after being transferred to 2D from 3D suspension culture (Fig. 3C).
MDA-MB-231 parental and LM2 cells moved from 3D to 2D culture glasses were immunolabled to test whether FN secreted from the cell grown in 3D was converted into the fibers. Paxillin, which is known to localize at focal adhesions was co-stained in order to analyze cell-attachment surface and to identify if FN fibers were formed as the cells adhered on the surface. In accordance with the increase of DOC-insoluble FN, it appeared that the FN fibers were formed by both of the cell lines, although LM2 cells showed smaller FN fibers than MDA-MB-231 parental cells (Fig. 3E).
Increased fibronectin in 3D facilitates adhesion on 2D surfaces and a HUVEC monolayer
To determine if the different cell spreading patterns are due to the presence of FN fibers, the cells grown in 3D were spread on uncoated coverslips or coverslips coated with FN-IV. In all four cell lines, increased rate of cell adhesion to 2D were observed on FN-coated culture glasses elucidating that fibronectin is effective promoter for attachment of cells grown in 3D (Figs. 4A–D, S4A–C). Also, the relative areas covered with the transferred cells were higher in control group than in FN1 siRNA-transfected group on uncoated culture glasses, whereas differences in attachment rates was not significant on FN-IV-coated plates (Fig. 4A–D). Therefore, these results suggest that the cells cultivated in 3D suspension condition that have high availability of FN facilitates binding of cells to attachable surfaces by being converted into ECM fibrils.
Metastasis is a step-wise process including extravasation during which cancer cells are required to escape from the circulatory system to secondary organs through efficient adhesion and penetration of a vascular vessel. We investigated the influence of the 3D-specific increase of FN on cell adhesion to human umbilical vein endodermal cells (HUVECs) since we hypothesized that enhanced FN availability of cancer cells in 3D contributes to metastasis by increasing cell adhesion to a second niche. MDA-MB-231 parental cells and LM2 cells were transferred from 3D culture on pre-cultured HUVEC monolayer. Depletion of FN reduced the cell adhesion rate onto HUVECs for 2 hours in both cell lines (Fig. 4E–G). Thus, this result suggests that the increase of FN in tumor cells has a role in cell adhesion on blood vessels during metastasis.
Increase of fibronectin in 3D facilitates cell-attachment from 3D to 2D via collaboration with integrin β-5
FN monomers contain many interaction sites for different types of integrin heterodimers26. The RGD motif, the triple amino acids (Arg-Gly-Asp) sequence present within many ECM proteins, was originally identified as being located within a FN molecule27. This small peptide found in FN interacts effectively with various integrin heterodimers including α5β1, αvβ3 and αvβ528,29 To examine whether the differences in cell attachment were due to the RGD region of FN, cells harvested from 3D plate were incubated in media containing RGD peptides prior to being transferred to 2D. Reduced attachment of cells was observed by the treatment of RGD peptides, showing that RGD peptides effectively interfere with the binding process of cells (Fig. 5A,B).
We next examined the effects of three different integrin β isoforms (integrin β-1, β-3, and β-5) using corresponding siRNAs because it has been reported that integrin αvβ3, α5β1, and α5β1 display the most, second and third affinity values to RGD peptides, respectively28. In addition, we found that these three integrin β isoforms were increased in MDA-MB-231 parental and LM2 cells cultured in 3D (Fig. 5C). Depletion of integrin β-5 deceased attachment of the cells grown in 3D onto FN-coated culture glasses, suggesting that the increased FN in 3D facilitates cell adhesions via interaction with integrin β-5 (Fig. 5E,F).
Additionally, we did double knocking-down of each type of integrin heterodimers; α5β1, αvβ3 and αvβ5, using siRNAs to identify whether αvβ5 heterodimers are crucial for cell adhesions on FN (Fig. 5G). Silencing of αvβ5 heterodimers caused significant reduction of the adhesion on FN in parental cells, and downregulation of three different integrin heterodimers influenced on the adhesion rate of LM2 cells (Fig. 5H,I). Remarkably, downregulation of integrin αvβ5 showed the most reduction of cell adhesion on FN-coated culture glasses in both cell lines.
Src family kinase is required for cell attachment from 3D to 2D
Cells cultured in 3D environments exhibit different architecture and signaling networks compared with cells grown in 2D. MDA-MB-231 parental and the organ-specific metastatic derivatives also exhibit changes in phosphorylation levels of signaling proteins in 3D compared to 2D. While PI3K/AKT pathway, JNK pathway, TGF-β pathway, and Ras-Erk pathway were down-regulated, Src family kinase (SFK) showed higher phosphorylation levels in 3D suspension culture (Fig. 2A and 6A). The levels of phosphorylated SFK gradually decreased when cells were re-cultivated in 2D following 3D suspension culture for 48 hours (Fig. 6B).
SFK is a key regulator for focal adhesion formation30, and it was reported that the loss of function mutant in Src disrupted proper focal adhesion formation and migratory behavior of cells. We investigated the role of Src using the SFK inhibitor, SU6656, on 2D-attachment of cells which had been cultured in 3D. The treatment of cells with SU6656 inhibited cell spreading on 2D surface, leaving the cells round in shape without noticeable adherent structures (Fig. 6C). In addition, the rate of cell attachment was also reduced by SU6656 on uncoated or FN-coated culture glasses, except for parental cells treated with FN siRNA on uncoated condition, suggesting that Src activity is more crucial for attachment of parental cells to FN fibrils (Fig. 6D–G). Thus, it appears that the activity of SFKs are required for cells to spread and form protrusions on 2D surfaces when they are transferred from 3D even though there are large amounts of FN in cell spheroids.
Down-regulated fibronectin of MDA-MB-231 parental cells causes decreased collective migration of cell-monolayers derived from 3D cellular aggregates
To further investigate the influence of increased FN on cell migration when cells were moved from 3D to 2D attachable surfaces, the cellular aggregates formed in ultra-low attachment round bottom plates were transferred to 2D culture-plates (Figs. 7 and S5). LM2 cells and BrM2 cells were excluded from the aggregate transferring experiment because they did not form compact cellular aggregates and they dispersed when being transferred. Also, it is worth noting that LM2 cells form only few multicellular tumor spheroids through comparative study on spheroid formation31. After being transferred from ultra-low attachment round bottom plates, parental or BoM2 cellular monolayers on 2D plates were derived from cell aggregates, and the area of cell migration at 24 hour was subtracted from the area of cell migration at 48 hour, and the net migration area for 24 hours were measured and compared (Fig. 7B). As expected, coating the plate with FN facilitated parental and BoM2 cell migration on 2D surfaces from the aggregates formed in 3D (Figs. 7C and S6A,B), confirming a crucial role of FN. Given that BoM2 did not display the increase of FN in 3D condition, depletion of FN using siRNAs was applied to only parental cells and reduced migration from the 3D cell aggregates was observed (Fig. 7C,D). This reduction was rescued when the parental spheroids were transferred onto FN-coated culture plate. Taken together, these results lead to the conclusion that increased FN in 3D suspension condition promotes MDA-MB-231 cell migration on 2D.
Discussion
Recently, the use of conventional 2D culture systems has been replaced by advanced culture systems that better mimic the in vivo environment. Using 3D culture systems, it is possible to gain new insights to bring a better understanding of diverse biological phenomena, such as in development and tumor progression. Here, we undertook a study using 3D culture conditions in a TNBC cell line and identified a potential role of FN in breast cancer metastasis. We observed that 3D suspension culture conditions resulted in the increase of FN expression, activation of different signaling pathways and cellular behaviors associated with metastasis.
We discovered that the mRNA and protein of FN were increased when cells are cultured in 3D with MDA-MB-231 parental and its lung specific metastatic sub-line, LM2 (Fig. 1). Although it has previously been shown that FN is increased in 3D suspension culture in studies using fibroblasts, which is a mesenchymal cell, our experimental results showed that the TNBC cells derived from epithelium do not express FN under normal 2D conditions, but they do when cultured in 3D32. Results of a systemic analysis of data on human breast cancer patient samples support a role of FN in breast cancer progression. Based on two different data sets, it was confirmed that the mean value of FN expression of TNBCs is higher, compared to HER2 positive or hormone receptor positive breast cancers. Also, FN overexpression is correlated with a poor 5-year survival rate in patients with TNBCs. MDA-MB-231 and three organotropic metastasis sublines used in the present study exhibit low expression of FN in 2D culture. By contrast, parental and LM2 cells showed up-regulated FN expression in 3D suspension culture. Interestingly, only 15 to 20% of TNBC patients display overexpression of FN1 mRNA (Fig. S1). Taken together, our observation of the changes in FN expression determined by culture system might be one possible explanation for this phenomenon related to FN1 expression in TNBC patients.
Cells grown in 3D suspension condition showed a gradual decrease in FN when cells were transferred to 2D (Fig. 1). Interestingly, we could not find specific data on the relationship between FN expression and metastasis to specific organs through analysis of databases. It is possible that their FN expression underwent a change through Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition (MET) during the colonization at new sites because human breast cancer samples were acquired from tumor attached to primary or metastatic sites as a solid form33. Thus, data obtained from patient samples and our in vitro experimental results may not contradict each other. In this respect, our experimental result is reminiscent of observation that mesenchymal positive CTC clusters which are tagged by probes for FN1 transcripts account for much more portion than epithelial positive CTC clusters from a study using human blood samples34. It was also reported that a junction protein called plakoglobin plays an important role in oligo-CTC cluster formation, oligo-CTC clusters showed high propensity to metastasize to lung than single CTCs in mice, and that the stability of FN1 mRNA is regulated by plakoglobin15,35,36. Also, tenascin C, an ECM protein known to interact with FN enhances invasiveness and outgrowth of lung micrometastases of MDA-MB-231-LM2 cells in mice15,37–39. Therefore, two observations that MDA-MB-231 parental and lung metastatic MDA-MB-231 cells spontaneously form spheroids by themselves and that FN is up-regulated in 3D suggest FN plays an important role during the circulation of tumor cells.
Although it was found that FN increased in 3D in MDA-MB-231 parental and LM2 cells, E-cadherin was also up-regulated in 3D. One possible explanation is cancer cells might survive in the circulation system using strengthened cell-cell interaction through E-cadherin and this interaction could promote collective migration on attachable surfaces following exit from the circulation. Thus, the role of increased E-cadherin in 3D should be further studied.
We found that FN expression is dependent on the activity of increased p38 MAPK in 3D because the treatment of cells with SB203580 inhibited the expression of FN and activity of MAPKAPK (Fig. 2). This is in agreement with the previous research demonstrating that p38 MAPK activity mediated by TGF-β increases FN expression in MDA-MB-231 cells19. However, different from previous studies, our experimental results showed that the 3D culture environment itself could increase the expression of FN without additional stimuli such as TGB- β to activate p38 MAPK. Since 3D suspension environment does not provide appropriate survival signals such as focal adhesions on 2D, it appears that cells in 3D activate p38MAPK by different mechanisms to increase adaptability that still wait to be elucidated.
Silencing of endogenous FN1 expression using siRNAs reduced the proportion of cells adhering and spreading to the culture glass and HUVEC monolayer in both parental and LM2 cells, suggesting that the increased expression of FN in 3D provides a favorable environment for cells to quickly and efficiently bind to blood vessels (Fig. 4). In addition, we found that this attachment is also mediated through integrin -5 (Fig. 5). However, it is still necessary to further investigate if integrin β-5 is involved in either binding to FN fibrils or fibrillogenesis. There are two possibilities to explain the role of integrin -5. First, integrin -5 only functions as an interacting partner to FN fibrils because reduced cell spreading by integrin -5 silencing was not rescued on FN coated plates. Another possibility is that integrin β-5 is also involved in the conversion of soluble FN to ECM fibrils because cells transferred from 3D suspension culture showed a decrease in the rate of spreading on uncoated-culture glasses in the case of integrin β-5 silencing. This reduced binding to uncoated-culture glasses might be due to failure to assemble FN fibrils or due to reduced binding to the formed FN fibrils.
We found that the phosphorylation levels of intracellular signaling proteins Smad, AKT, ERK, and JNK are reduced, but SFK is increased in 3D. We also showed that the activity of SFK is necessary for cells to adhere to FN fibrils (Fig. 6). Given that Src plays an important role in the regulation of size and dynamics of focal adhesions of migrating cells and that enhanced activation and genetic mutation of Src promote oncogenesis30,40–42, there is a possibility that up-regulated FN, SFK, and integrins contribute not only to survival in the 3D environment in the circulation but also to the adaptation when cells come in contact with new sites as metastatic organs.
Efforts have been made to clarify the characteristics of metastatic cells showing a tendency to metastasize to specific organs. However, there are data for and against the ‘soil and seed’ hypothesis, because all other metastatic organs, other than the primary source, do not already provide a hospitable environment for metastatic cancer cells. Alternatively, the ‘seed bringing their own soil’ hypothesis is that the circulating metastatic cells deliver the factors necessary for their own adaptation to survive at the new niche as disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and the evidence supporting this has gradually accumulated43. It was reported that CTC clusters traveling in the body vessels have better metastatic efficiency than single CTCs since CTC clusters can take diverse strategies for successful metastasis, such as protecting themselves from immune cell’s attacks and containing necessary survival factors such as TGF-β and PDGF in CTC clusters44. And our results showed that MDA-MB-231 parental and LM2 cells are able to generate their own structurally supportive components by themselves and to maintain up-regulated integrin signaling for dissemination, although our experimental 3D culture condition has limitations to exactly mimic in vivo microemboli containing stromal cells, cytokines, and other additive components as well as tumor cells. Thus, this could be supportive evidence for the latter hypothesis i.e., the seed bringing its own soil. It was demonstrated that DTCs derived from breast cancer cell secrete collagen crosslinking enzyme LOX and PLOD2, thereby amplifying focal adhesion signaling mediated by integrin by stiffening ECM45,46. Considering these biological findings, the activation mechanism of genes involved in the formation of FN fibril when TNBC cells are transferred from 3D to 2D should provide further insights into the role of FN in metastasis.
Methods
Reagents and antibodies
Reagents. DMSO (Sigma, D8401), SB203580 (Calbiocam, 559389), SU6656 (Sigma, S9692), and RGD peptides (Sigma, A8052).
Antibodies. Fibronectin (BD Biosciences, 610077), α-tubulin(Sigma, T5168), β-actin (Sigma, A5441), integrin β-1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4706), integrin β-3(D7X3P) (Cell Signaling Technology, 13166), integrin β-4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-514426), integrin β-5 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-5402), integrin α-5 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4705), integrin α-v (Cell Signaling Technology, 4711) ERK1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-94), p-ERK(T202/Y204) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9101), AKT (Cell Signaling Technology, 9272), p-AKT(S473) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9271), SAPK/JNK (Cell Signaling Technology, 9258), p-SAPK/JNK(T183/Y185) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9251), Smad2/3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 3102), Src (Cell Signaling Technology, 2110), p-Src(Y416) (Cell Signaling Technology, 2101), p38MAPK (Cell Signaling Technology, 9211), p-p38MAPK (Cell Signaling Technology, 9212), MAPKAPK2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 3042), p-MAPKAPK2(Thr334) (Cell Signaling Technology, 3007), and), p-paxillin (Y118) (Cell Signaling Technology, 2541).
Cell culture
MDA-MB-231 parental cells, LM2 cells, BoM2 cells, and BrM2 cells were provided as a generous gift from Dr. Joan Massague. These cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium high glucose (Welgene, South Korea) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (JR Scientific, Woodland, CA, USA), 100U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin with L-glutamine (Welgene). For 3D culture, cells were incubated in ultra-low attachment surface, flat bottom plate (Corning). Human Umbilical Vein Cells (HUVECs) (Science cell, USA) were provided as a generous gift from Dr. Miyoung Kim. HUVECs were cultivated in Endothelial Cell Growth Basal Medium-2 (Lonza, USA) supplemented with EGMTM-2 MV Microvascular Endothelial SingleQuotsTM Kit (Lonza, USA) on 0.1% gelatin (Welgene, South Korea) coated culture plates or glasses. All cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.
Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
Total messenger RNAs were extracted from cells using RiboEx (Geneall, South Korea) and Hybrid-RTM extraction kit (Geneall, South Korea) according to manufacturer’s instruction. The concentration of total mRNA was measured by Nonodrop spectrometer (Thermoscinetific). Generation of first strand cDNA from total mRNA and amplification of this cDNA strand were reacted together using Prime ScriptTM one step RT-PCR kit Ver2 (TAKARA, Japan) and PCR machine (Bio-rad, Richmond, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Differently expressed PCR products were separated by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Specific primer sequences are as followed: FN1 fwd, 5′-AAACTGCAAACTCCGTCACC-3′; FN1 rev, 5′-AGACAGAGGGACCCAACTTG-3′ GAPDH fwd, 5′-GTCAGTGGTGGACCTGACCT-3′; GAPDH rev, 5′-AGGGGAGATTCAGTGTGGTG-3′
Small-interfering RNA knockdown
Cells were seeded into 60 mm plate at ~30% confluent for serial transfection. After incubation for 24 hours, cells were primarily transfected with siRNAs against FN1 (Bioneer, South Korea), ITGB1 (Bioneer, South Korea), ITGB3 (Bioneer, South Korea), ITGB5 (Bioneer, South Korea), ITGA5 (Bioneer, South Korea), ITGVA (Bioneer, South Korea), or negative control siRNA (Bioneer, South Korea) using Lipofectamine RNAi Max (Invitrogen, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocols. Primarily transfected cells incubated for 48 hour at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator at 5%. Additionally, cells were secondly transfected with siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAi Max and incubated for additional 48 hours before indicated experiments.
Adhesion assay
Cells were collected after incubation for 48 hours in a 3D culture plate by centrifugation at 300 × g for 5 minutes. After used culture media were removed by aspiration, cells were resuspended with serum-free DMEM and agitated for 30 minutes in an incubator at 37 °C. 1 × 105 Cells were replated on 2D culture glasses in 24-well plate and incubated for 2 and a half hours at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator at 5%. To coat the glasses with fibronectin (0.001%), fibronectin-IV was purchased from Sigma (Sigma, F0895). After unattached cells were removed by aspiration, cells on culture glasses were co-fixed and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in 4% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 10 minutes, and stained with phalloidin conjugated with Oregon green (Invitrogen, USA) for 30 min at RT. 4,6-Diamidino-2-pheylindile (DAPI) (1 μg/ml) was incubated for 5 minutes. Prolong gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen, USA) was used for mounting coverslips. Cell fluorescence was observed with ZEISS Observer Z1 microscope with Apotome 2. Image acquisition and processing were performed with AxioVision 4.8. Cell attached area was measured by ZEISS AxioVision4.8AutoMeasure module (Zeiss, Germany).
For cell adhesion assay on HUVEC monolayer, 5 × 104 HUVECs were seeded and cultured on gelatin coated culture glasses for 48 hours. MDA-MB-231 parental and LM2 cells were stained with CellTracker TMgreen 5-Chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA) (Invitrogen, USA) in serum-free media for 30 minutes. Resuspended MDA-MB-231 parental cells or LM2 cells were re-plated on HUVEC monolayer and cultured for 2 hours at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator at 5% and followed by fixation with 4% formaldehyde. Fixed co-cultivated cells were stained with DAPI.
DOC fraction
Deoxycholate fraction of fibronectin was conducted according to the previously published protocol25. Briefly, cells attached on 2D surface or collected from 3D culture plate were washed with ice-cold PBS, followed by being lysed with DOC buffer (2% Deoxycholate, 0.02 M Tris-HCl,pH 8.8, 2 mM PMSF, 2 mM NaF, 2 mM Na7VO4, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche), protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma)). Lysis was carried out by passing the lysate through a 23-gauge syringe needle more than ten times, followed by incubation on rotor wheel for 30 minutes at 4 °C. The lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, the supernatants were transferred to other tubes as the soluble fraction. Pellets were washed briefly with DOC buffer and the used buffer was discarded, remaining pellet was designated as the insoluble fraction. The insoluble fraction was resuspended by 2× laemmli sample buffer (0.25 M Tis-HCl, 20% glycerol, 4% Sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.004% Bromophenol blue, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche), protease inhibitor cocktail (sigma)). The soluble fraction was mixed with 2× laemmli sample buffer and used for the internal comparison of ratio among samples.
3D cellular aggregates formation and aggregates migration assay
Cells were cultured in 96-well ultra-low attachment round bottom plates (Corning) at concentration of 5,000cells/well. The plates containing cells were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min to form aggregates. The aggregates were allowed to grow in serum containing media for 48 hours at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator at 5%. Then the cell-aggregates were transferred to culture plates or fibronectin coated culture plates in which serum containing media is present and the aggregates were cultured for 48 hours for analysis.
Immunoblotting
Whole cell lysates were extracted by laemmli 2× sample buffer containing a cocktail of phosphatase inhibitor, PhosStop (Roche) and protease inhibitors. The total lysate of proteins separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to 0.2 μm nitrocellulose membranes for immunoblotting, the nitrocellulose membrane was incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and goat-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch), and bovine anti-goat IgG-HRP (Santa Cruz Biothechnology) were used as secondary antibodies. To visualize the proteins, peroxidase substrate (Thermo Scientific) was applied for enhanced chemiluminescence. Chemi-DOC MP image system (Bio-Rad, USA) was used to capture image.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were collected by centrifugation (Gyrogen 1236MG) for 5 minutes at 300 × g from 3D culture plates after 48 hr incubation. Collected cells were incubated for 30 minutes in a shaking incubator at 100 rpm at 37 °C and re-plated on 2D culture plate. Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 10 minutes followed by permeabilization with 1% DOC for 10 minutes or not, and incubated with primary antibodies for 30 minutes, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies for 30 minutes at RT. DAPI (1 μg/ml) was incubated for 5 minutes. Prolong gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen, USA) was used for mounting coverslips. Cell fluorescence was observed with ZEISS Observer Z1 microscope with Apotome 2. Image acquisition and processing were performed with AxioVision 4.8.
Data mining
GOBO (http://co.bmc.lu.se/gobo/) and UCSC (http://genome-cancer.ucsc.edu/) cancer genomic browser online tools were used to evaluate the expression level of FN1 in different subtypes of breast cancer.
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed three or more individual experiments. For all parametric data, an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to evaluate difference between groups.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Joan Massague for kindly providing MDA-MB-231 parental, LM2, BoM2, and BrM2 cells and Dr. Miyoung Kim for generously providing HUVECs. This work was financially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education Science and Technology (2018R1A2A2A05021262).
Author contributions
Hwa-Jeong Park performed most of the experiments and statistical analyses and participated in the study design and writing the draft manuscript. David M. Helfman is the principal investigator for this project and participated in the study design and writing the draft manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary files).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-56276-3.
References
- 1.Dolznig H, et al. Modeling colon adenocarcinomas in vitro a 3D co-culture system induces cancer-relevant pathways upon tumor cell and stromal fibroblast interaction. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:487–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ekert Jason E., Johnson Kjell, Strake Brandy, Pardinas Jose, Jarantow Stephen, Perkinson Robert, Colter David C. Three-Dimensional Lung Tumor Microenvironment Modulates Therapeutic Compound Responsiveness In Vitro – Implication for Drug Development. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e92248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pickl M, Ries CH. Comparison of 3D and 2D tumor models reveals enhanced HER2 activation in 3D associated with an increased response to trastuzumab. Oncogene. 2009;28:461–8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Luca Anna C., Mersch Sabrina, Deenen René, Schmidt Stephan, Messner Isabelle, Schäfer Karl-Ludwig, Baldus Stephan E., Huckenbeck Wolfgang, Piekorz Roland P., Knoefel Wolfram T., Krieg Andreas, Stoecklein Nikolas H. Impact of the 3D Microenvironment on Phenotype, Gene Expression, and EGFR Inhibition of Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e59689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sastry SK, Burridge K. Focal adhesions: a nexus for intracellular signaling and cytoskeletal dynamics. Exp Cell Res. 2000;261:25–36. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.5043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cukierman E, et al. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science. 2001;294:1708–12. doi: 10.1126/science.1064829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fraley SI, et al. A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:598–604. doi: 10.1038/ncb2062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Valastyan S, Weinberg RA. Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell. 2011;147:275–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fidler IJ. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:453–8. doi: 10.1038/nrc1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schneider BP, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: risk factors to potential targets. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:8010–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1938–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1001389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cailleau R, Olive M, Cruciger QV. Long-term human breast carcinoma cell lines of metastatic origin: preliminary characterization. In Vitro. 1978;14:911–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02616120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Minn AJ, et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature. 2005;436:518–24. doi: 10.1038/nature03799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li CL, et al. Fibronectin induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells via activation of calpain. Oncol Lett. 2017;13:3889–3895. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.5896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ioachim E, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of extracellular matrix components tenascin, fibronectin, collagen type IV and laminin in breast cancer: their prognostic value and role in tumour invasion and progression. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:2362–70. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00210-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ringnér Markus, Fredlund Erik, Häkkinen Jari, Borg Åke, Staaf Johan. GOBO: Gene Expression-Based Outcome for Breast Cancer Online. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e17911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Neve RM, et al. A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:515–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goldman Mary, Craft Brian, Swatloski Teresa, Cline Melissa, Morozova Olena, Diekhans Mark, Haussler David, Zhu Jingchun. The UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser: update 2015. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;43(D1):D812–D817. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Limoge M, et al. Tumor p38MAPK signaling enhances breast carcinoma vascularization and growth by promoting expression and deposition of pro-tumorigenic factors. Oncotarget. 2017;8:61969–61981. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ono K, Han J. The p38 signal transduction pathway: activation and function. Cell Signal. 2000;12:1–13. doi: 10.1016/S0898-6568(99)00071-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Han Q, et al. Rac1-MKK3-p38-MAPKAPK2 pathway promotes urokinase plasminogen activator mRNA stability in invasive breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:48379–85. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209542200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vakonakis I, et al. Interdomain association in fibronectin: insight into cryptic sites and fibrillogenesis. EMBO J. 2007;26:2575–83. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Aguirre KM, McCormick RJ, Schwarzbauer JE. Fibronectin self-association is mediated by complementary sites within the amino-terminal one-third of the molecule. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:27863–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ugarova TP, et al. Conformational transitions in the cell binding domain of fibronectin. Biochemistry. 1995;34:4457–66. doi: 10.1021/bi00013a039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sechler JL, Takada Y, Schwarzbauer JE. Altered rate of fibronectin matrix assembly by deletion of the first type III repeats. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:573–83. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.To WS, Midwood KS. Plasma and cellular fibronectin: distinct and independent functions during tissue repair. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2011;4:21. doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-4-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Main AL, et al. The three-dimensional structure of the tenth type III module of fibronectin: an insight into RGD-mediated interactions. Cell. 1992;71:671–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90600-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kapp TG, et al. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Activity and Selectivity Profile of Ligands for RGD-binding Integrins. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39805. doi: 10.1038/srep39805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Plow EF, et al. Ligand binding to integrins. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:21785–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R000003200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li L, Okura M, Imamoto A. Focal adhesions require catalytic activity of Src family kinases to mediate integrin-matrix adhesion. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:1203–17. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.4.1203-1217.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gencoglu MF, et al. Comparative Study of Multicellular Tumor Spheroid Formation Methods and Implications for Drug Screening. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4:410–420. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Salmenpera P, et al. Formation and activation of fibroblast spheroids depend on fibronectin-integrin interaction. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:3444–52. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brabletz T. To differentiate or not–routes towards metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:425–36. doi: 10.1038/nrc3265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yu M, et al. Circulating breast tumor cells exhibit dynamic changes in epithelial and mesenchymal composition. Science. 2013;339:580–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1228522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Aceto N, et al. Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis. Cell. 2014;158:1110–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Todorovic V, et al. Plakoglobin regulates cell motility through Rho- and fibronectin-dependent Src signaling. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:3576–86. doi: 10.1242/jcs.070391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Oskarsson T, et al. Breast cancer cells produce tenascin C as a metastatic niche component to colonize the lungs. Nat Med. 2011;17:867–74. doi: 10.1038/nm.2379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kii I, et al. Incorporation of tenascin-C into the extracellular matrix by periostin underlies an extracellular meshwork architecture. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:2028–39. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.051961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gocheva V, et al. Quantitative proteomics identify Tenascin-C as a promoter of lung cancer progression and contributor to a signature prognostic of patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E5625–E5634. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707054114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fincham VJ, Frame MC. The catalytic activity of Src is dispensable for translocation to focal adhesions but controls the turnover of these structures during cell motility. EMBO J. 1998;17:81–92. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Reynolds AB, et al. Activation of the oncogenic potential of the avian cellular src protein by specific structural alteration of the carboxy terminus. EMBO J. 1987;6:2359–64. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02512.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kmiecik TE, Shalloway D. Activation and suppression of pp60c-src transforming ability by mutation of its primary sites of tyrosine phosphorylation. Cell. 1987;49:65–73. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90756-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Massague J, Obenauf AC. Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature. 2016;529:298–306. doi: 10.1038/nature17038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hong Y, Fang F, Zhang Q. Circulating tumor cell clusters: What we know and what we expect (Review) Int J Oncol. 2016;49:2206–2216. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Erler JT, et al. Lysyl oxidase is essential for hypoxia-induced metastasis. Nature. 2006;440:1222–6. doi: 10.1038/nature04695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gilkes DM, et al. Procollagen lysyl hydroxylase 2 is essential for hypoxia-induced breast cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer Res. 2013;11:456–66. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary files).